Machine authentication with MAR and ACS - revisited

I'm wondering if anyone else has overcame the issue I'm about to describe.
The scenario:
We are happily using ACS 4.1 to authenticate wireless PEAP clients to an external Windows AD database.
We do have machine authentication via PEAP enabled, but at this time we are not using Machine Access Restrictions as part of the external database authentication configuration.
The clients (we care about) are using the native XP ZWC supplicant and are configured to "authenticate as machine when available".
The passed authentications log does successfully show the machines authenticating.
The challege:
We only want to permit users on our PEAP protected WLAN if the machine they are using has an account in the domain (and they are a Windows XP box - the currents standard corporate image).
In a testing lab, we enable Machine Access Restrictions, with the access mapped to "No Access" if there is no machine auth, or if machine auth fails. If a machine is shut down and boots fresh, or if the logged on user chooses to logoff while on that WLAN - we see the Windows box sends its machine authentication. As I understand it - a windows XP box will only attempt to authenticate as a machine when a user logs off, or upon initial boot.
In our environment (and I'm sure many others) - if a user comes into the office and docks their laptop and is attached to the wired LAN and boots or logs on - the machine maybe authenticating - but it is authenticating directly to the AD as our wired LAN is not using 802.1x or ACS radius.
So the user maybe logged on and working on the network - and then choose to undock which activates the wireless.
The problem then - the machine does NOT attempt to authenticate as a machine and only processes the user credentials - which get passed onto ACS vial the WLC - and when MAR is enabled with the No Access mapping for no machine auth - the user auth obviously fails.
Has anyone seen / over come this ?
Our goal is to enforce that only standard XP imaged machines get on the wireless PEAP network (where the configuration is maintained by GPO).

Here's the only thing I could find on extending the schema (I'm not a schema expert):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms676900%28VS.85%29.aspx
If all of your clients are Windows machines, it's easier to stick with PEAP for machine auth, user auth, or both. However, your RADIUS (ACS) server should have a certificate that the clients trust. You can configure the clients to ignore the RADIUS server cert, but then your clients will trust any network that looks/works like yours. Get a cert/certs for your RADIUS server(s).
You can have PEAP and EAP-TLS configured on your ACS server without causing problems for your PEAP clients (be aware that most of my experience is with 4.1/4.2. Earlier versions may not work the same way). Your comment about what you're testing is confusing me. Let's say you have (only) PEAP configured for machine auth on both the client and the ACS server (no user auth is configured on the client, or in ACS). Your client will offer it's machine account AD credentials to the ACS server in order to authenticate to the network. Those credentials will be validated against AD by your ACS server, and then the machine will get an IP address and connect to your network. Once your machine is on the network, and a user tries to log on, then the user's AD credentials will be validated against AD (without any involvement of ACS). You should not need PEAP and EAP-TLS together. Both are used for the same purpose: 802.1X authentication for network access. PEAP only uses AD to validate machine credentials (or user credentials), because you configured your ACS server to use AD as a user database for validating 802.1X credentials. You could just have easily used PEAP on the client side, but told ACS to an LDAP connection to a Linux box with a user/machine database. Validating credentials for network access (802.1X) is not the same thing as authenticating to AD for server/printer/email/whatever access. I wish I could explain this better...

Similar Messages

Machine authentication with Windows 7

Version: ISE 1.2p12
Hello,
I'm doing user and machine authentication with ISE.
I use a first authorization rule to authenticate the machine against the AD. If it's part computers of the domain.
Then I use an authorization rule to check if the user's group in AD with the credential he used to open the session + "Network Access:WasMachineAuthenticated = True"
Things seems to be working and I see my switch port is "Authz Success" but shortly after the Windows 7 machine is behaving like 802.1X authentication fails. The little computer on the bottom right has a cross on it.
If I disable and enable again the network card of that windows machine it works.
Does any one of you have an idea about this problem ? something to tweak on Windows 7 like timers...
Thank you

Hi Mika. My comments below:
a) You told me that MAR ("Network Access:WasMachineAuthenticated = True") has some drawbacks. When hibernation is used it can cause problems since the MAC address could have been removed from the cache when the user un-hibernate its computer. Then why not increasing the MAR cache to a value of 7 days then ? Regarding the roaming between wire and wireless it's a problem indeed.
NS: I don't believe that the MAR cache would be affected by a machine hibernating or going to sleep. There are some dot1x related bug fixes that Massimo outlined in his first pos that you should look into. But yes, you can increase the MAR timer to a value that fits your environent
b) You suggest to use one authorization rule for the device which should be part of the AD and one authorization rule for the user with the extra result "IdentityAccessRestricted = False". By the was, are we really talking about authorization rules here ? I will try this but it's difficult for me to imagine how it would really work.
NS: Perhaps there is some confusion here but let me try to explain this again. The "IdentityAccessRestricted" is a check that can be done against a machine or a user account in AD. It is an optional attribute and you don't have to have it. I use it so I can prevent terminated users from gaining access to the network by simply disabling their AD account. Again, that account can be either for a "user" or for a "machine"
z) One question I was asking myself for a long time. All of us want to do machine+user authentication but Windows write Machine OR User Authentication. This "OR" is very confusing.
NS: At the moment, the only way you can accomplish a true machine+user authentication is to use the Cisco AnyConnect supplicant. The process is also known as "EAP-Chaining" and/or "EAP-TEAP." In fact there is an official RFC (RFC 7170 - See link below). Now the question is when and if Microsoft, Apple, Linux, etc will start supporting it:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7170
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

Machine Authentication with PEAP on Wireless with ISE1.2

Hi All,
We are facing issues while doing machine authentication in ISE1.2 with wireless PEAP authentication. Without machine authentication normal PEAP works very fine but as soon as we enable machine authentication and create policy for machine authentication and in user authentication policy we put condition "was machine authenticated" then it works for some machine properly but does not work for other machines. Its totally random behaviour sometime it stopped working for machines which were authenticated before.
I just want to know if I m missing some configuration or its a bug in ISE. Can some body share step by step configuration for machine authentication with PEAP.
Really It would be a great help.
Thanks
Ninja

Did you Apply service pactch 4?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

ACS 5.3, EAP-TLS Machine Authentication with Active Directory

I have ACS 5.3. I am testing EAP-TLS Machine Authentication using Active Directory as an external Identity Store. II was testing and everything was going fine until I did some failure testing.
My problem: I deleted my computer account out of Active Directory and tried to authenticate my wireless laptop and it still worked when it should have failed.
Here is some of the output of the ACS log. You can see that the computer could not be found in AD and this was returned to the ACS. However, ACS still went ahead and authenticated the computer successfully.
Evaluating Identity Policy
15006 Matched Default Rule
22037 Authentication Passed
22023 Proceed to attribute retrieval
24433 Looking up machine/host in Active Directory - LAB-PC-PB.VITS.attcst.sbc.com
24437 Machine not found in Active Directory
22016 Identity sequence completed iterating the IDStores
Evaluating Group Mapping Policy
12506 EAP-TLS authentication succeeded
11503 Prepared EAP-Success
Evaluating Exception Authorization Policy
15042 No rule was matched
Evaluating Authorization Policy
15006 Matched Default Rule
15016 Selected Authorization Profile - Permit Access
22065 Max sessions policy passed
22064 New accounting session created in Session cache
11002 Returned RADIUS Access-Accept
I was assuming that if the computer was not found, the Identity Policy would fail, so I did not configure any authorization policy. Do I need an authorization policy to tell the ACS to fail the authentication if the machine cannot be found in AD? If I need an authorization policy, how do I configure it?
Note: In my Identity Store Sequence, I did enable the option:
For Attribute Retrieval only:
If internal user/host not found or disabled then exit sequence and treat as "User Not Found"
but this only seems to work for internal identity stores (at least based on my testing)
Under my Access Policy Identity tab, I configured the following Advanced features:
Advanced Options
If authentication failed
RejectDropContinue
If user not found
RejectDropContinue
If process failed
RejectDropContinue
And that didn't do anything either.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

Can try the following. Define an attribute to be retrieved from Active Directory and that exists for all objects. When defining the attribute it can be given a default value. Assign a default value which is a value that will never be returned for a real machine entry (eg "DEFAULTVALUE") and give it a "Policy Condition Name"
Then can make a rule in the authorization policy such as
If "Policy Condition Name" equals "DEFAULTVALUE" then "DenyAccess"

Apple macosx machine authentication with ISE using EAP-TLS

Hello,
On a ongoing setup we are using eap-tls authentication with account validation against AD. We have our own CA (microsoft based). ISE version 1.2.1 patch 1.
With windows machines all is working well. We are using computer authentication only.
Now the problem is that we wish to do the same with MAC OSX machines.
We are using casper software suite and are able to push certificates into macosx, and are doing machine authentication.
in ISE the certificate authentication profile is being set to look at the subject alternative name - DNS name of the machines. Whenever we set it to the UPN (hostname$) windows accounts are not found in ad.
When MAC OSX authenticate as machines (they have a computer account in AD) they present themselves with RADIUS-Username = hostname$ instead of host/hostname.
The consequence is that by lacking the host/, ISE considers that this is a user authentication, instead of a computer one, and when it sets off to find the account, it searches in User class instead of Computer - which obviously returns no results.
Is anybody aware of any way to force MAC OSX to present a host/hostname RADIUS-Username when authenticating?
Any similar experiences of authenticating MAC OSX with ISE and machine/computer authentication are welcome.
Thanks
Gustavo Novais

Additional information from the above question.
I have the following setup;
ACS 3.2(3) built 11 appliance
-Cisco AP1200 wireless access point
-Novell NDS to be used as an external database
-Windows 2003 enterprise with standalone Certificate Authorithy Services Installed
-Windows XP SP2 Client
My Goal is to use Windows XP Native Wlan Utility to connect to AP using EAP-TLS authentication against Novell NDS.
Tried to connect using Cisco compatible wlaN utility and authenticate using EAP-GTC against Novell NDS for for users, it works fine and perfectly.
When connecting using EAP-TLS, I am getting an error from ACS failed attempt "Auth type Not supported by External DB". But in the ACS documentation says that it supports EAP-TLS. How true is this? Is there anybody have the same problem? Do I need to upgrade my ACS? What should I do? What other authentication type could be used to utilize native WinXP Wlan Utility?
Please help...
Thanks

Machine authentication by certificate and windows domain checking

Hi,
We intend to deploy machine?s certificate authentication for wifi users.
We want to check certificate validity of the machine, and also that the machine is included on the windows domain.
We intend to use EAP-TLS :
- One CA server.
- each machine (laptop) retrieves its own certificate from GPO or SMS
- the public certificate of the CA is pushed on the ACS as well as on each of the machine (laptop)
- ACS version is the appliance one
- one ACS remote agent installed on the A.D.
- when a user intends to log on the wifi network :
- the server (ACS appliance) sends its certificate to the client. This client checks the certificate thanks to the CA server certificate he already trusts, results : the client also trusts the ACS?s certificate signed by the CA server .
- the client sends its certificate to the server (ACS appliance). This ACS checks the certificate thanks to the CA server certificate he already trusts, results : the ACS also trusts the client?s certificate signed by the CA server but the ACS also checks that this certificate isn?t revocated (the ACS checks this thanks to the CA server CRL ? certificate revocation list).
Am I right about these previous points ?
And then my question is : is it possible to check that the machine is also included in the windows domain ?
That is, is it possible for the ACS to retrieve the needed field (perhaps CN ?? certificate type "host/....") and then perform an authentication request to the A.D. (active directory) thanks to the ACS remote agent ? We want to perform only machine authentication, not user authentication.
Thanks in advance for your attention.
Best Regards,
Arnaud

Hi Prem,
Thanks for these inputs.
I've passed the logs details to full, performed other tests and retrieved the package.cab.
I've started investigating the 2 log files you pointed.
First, we can see that the requests reach the ACS, so that's a good point.
Then, I'm not sure how to understand the messages.
In the auth.log, we can see the message "no profile match". I guess it is about network access profile. For my purpose (machine authentication by certificate), I don't think Network Access Profiles to be mandatory to be configured.
But I'm not sure this NAP problem to be the root cause of my problem.
And when no NAP is matched, then the default action should accept.
We can see the correct name of the machine (host/...). We can see that he's trying to authenticate this machine "against CSDB". Then we have several lines with "status -2046" but I can't understand what the problem is.
I don't know what CSDB is.
I've configured external user database: for this, I've configured windows database with Remote Agent. The domain is retrieved and added in the domain list. And EAP-TLS machine authentication is enabled.
I copy below an extract of the auth.log.
I also attach parts of auth.log and RDS.log.
If you have any ideas or advices ?
Thanks in advance for your attention.
Best Regards,
Arnaud
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 S 5100 16860 Listening for new TCP connection ------------
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 I 0143 16704 [PDE]: PolicyMgr::CreateContext: new context id=1
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 I 0143 16704 [PDE]: PdeAttributeSet::addAttribute: User-Name=host/nomadev2001.lab.fr
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 I 0143 16704 [PDE]: PolicyMgr::SelectService: context id=1; no profile was matched - using default (0)
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 I 0143 1880 [PDE]: PolicyMgr::Process: request type=5; context id=1; applied default profiles (0) - do nothing
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 I 5388 1880 Attempting authentication for Unknown User 'host/nomadev2001.lab.fr'
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 I 1645 1880 pvAuthenticateUser: authenticate 'host/nomadev2001.lab.fr' against CSDB
AUTH 04/07/2007 12:25:41 I 5081 1880 Done RQ1026, client 50, status -2046

802.1x PEAP Machine Authentication with MS Active Directory

802.1x PEAP Machine and User Authentication with MS Active Directory:
I have a simple pilot-text environment, with
- Microsoft XP Client,
- Cisco 2960 Switch,
- ACS Solution Engine (4.1.4)
- MS Active Directory on Win 2003 Server
The Remote Agent (at 4.1.4) is on the same server as the MS AD.
User Authentication works correctly, but Machine Authentication fails.
Failed machine authenticaton is reported in the "Failed Attempts" log of the ACS SE.
The Remote Agent shows an error:
See Attachment.
Without Port-Security the XP workstation is able to log on to the domain.
Many thanks for any indication.
Regards,
Stephan Imhof

Is host/TestClientMan.Test.local the name of the machine? What does the AAA tell for you the reason it fails?

Configuring Basic Authentication with Username and password on BizTalk Schema Service

Hi,
I have published my schema as a webservice with WCF-BASICHTTP adapter in IIS 8.0.
I wanted to have a Basic Authentication(User name and password restriction).
I made the Receive location with Security mode as Transport and Transport Client Crediential Type as Basic.
I also set the Service in IIS with Basic Authentication only enabled.
But I don't know how to provide a UserName and Password Authentication.
Please provide your suggestions
Regards, Vignesh S

Hi,
Try & go through the below MSDN link as it explains configuring WCF BasicHttp adapter very well.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb246064(v=bts.80).aspx
HTH,
Sumit
Sumit Verma - MCTS BizTalk 2006/2010 - Please indicate "Mark as Answer" or "Mark as Helpful" if this post has answered the question

Dynamic VLAN assignment with WLC and ACS for

Currently, using our autonomous APs and ACS, our users get separate VLANs per building based on their security level (students or staff). Basically, the student VLAN in one building is different from that of the student VLANs in other buildings on campus. Currently, we do this by filling the Tunnel-Private-Group-ID IETF RADIUS attribute with the VLAN name. This all works because each individual AP can map VLAN names to different VLANs like this:
dot11 vlan-name STUDENT vlan 2903
dot11 vlan-name FACSTAF vlan 2905
As we are working on our WiSM deployment, we see that the document below shows how to do the dynamic VLAN assignment on our WLAN controllers:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9bd1.shtml
However, we haven't figured out if it's possible to still provide our users with different VLANs for each building they're in.
With the instructions above, it looks like ACS uses a Cisco RADIUS Attribute to indicate the Air-Interface-Name, mapping an ACS/AD group to a single WLC interface which can only have one VLAN/subnet associated with it.
Does anybody know if what we're trying to accomplish is possible, or if we're really stuck with only one VLAN/subnet per mapped ACS group?

We only have the one WiSM for all of campus, so it's handling everything. This Cisco docs do indicate how to put differnet users in different Vlans, but we don't currently see a way to also put them in different subnets per building.
This being the case, any suggestions on how best to handle more than a Class C subnet's worth of users? Should we just subnet larger than Class C, or is there a more elegant way of handling this?

WD World Edition 1TB as a Time Machine drive with Mac and XP?

I plan on buying a WD World Edition 1TB to use as my Time Machine drive over wireless netowrk at home for my 320GB MBP.
My wife has a Windows XP PC so I would like to partition the 1TB into maybe 600MB for me and 400MB for her.
First of all, will this type of partition work with TM and also, what format should the WD Drive be? I have installed MacFuse and NTFS-3G on my MBP.
Any info from someone who does something simalr would be greatly appreciated.
Dave

That sounds fine.
So in theory, the WD comes with no partitions so I could set the whole thing up on the XP machine and set the partition sizes, then go the Mac, connect to the partition I've set aside for myself and select it, at which point the Mac will format it to HFS and start backing up?
You say the Mac is oblivious to partitions so what would stop it formatting the entire drive to HFS?
Ideally I'd like to get the WD software to backup the XP machine to the XP partition and TM to backup the Mac to the HFS partition. Do you know if this is likely to work? Hopefuilly someone with this drive will be able to answer as well.
Thanks for your help so far

ACS 5.3 Radius authentication with ASA and DACL

Hi,
I am trying to do Radius authentication on the ACS 5.3 for VPN access (cisco client) using a downloadable ACL with AD identity
Clients are connecting to an ASA 5510 with image asa843-K8.bin
I followed the configuration example on the Cisco site, but I am having some problems
First : AD identity is not triggered, I put a profile :
Status
Name
Conditions
Results
Hit Count
NDG:Location
Time And Date
AD1:memberOf
Authorization Profiles
1
TestVPNDACL
-ANY-
-ANY-
equals Network Admin
TEST DACL
0
But if I am getting no hits on it, Default Access is being used (Permit Access)
So I tried putting the DACL in the default profile, but when connecting I am immediately disconnected.
I can see the DACL/ASA being authenticated in the ACS log but no success
I am using my user which is member of the Network Admin Group.
Am I missing something?
Any help greatly appreciated!
Wim

Hello Stephen,
As per the IP Pools feature, the ACS 5.x does not include such functionality. It is not on the ACS 5.x roadmap either as the recommended scenario would be to use a dedicated DHCP server.
ACS 4.x included that functionality, however, it was not the best solution as the ACS returned the IP Address value as a RADIUS Attribute instead of acting as a real DCHP server.
As per the IMEI and MISDN I am assuming you are referring to International Mobile Equipment Identity and Mobile Subscriber ISDN. Correct me if I am wrong.
In that case it seems that the ACS 5.x should be able to Allow or Deny access based on Radius Attribute 30 (Called-Station-Id) and 31 (Calling-Station-Id).
In that case you might want to use the End-Station Filters feature and use it as the condition for the Rule. The End-Station Filter feature uses CLI/DNIS where CLI is Radius Attribute 31 and DNIS is Attribute 30.
I am assuming a Generic Username will be embedded on the devices request. In that case you will define which end-user devices will be granted access based on the above attributes.
Here is a snapshot of the section:

AD Machine Authentication with Cisco ISE problem

Hi Experts,
I am new with ISE, I have configured ISE & Domain computers for PEAP authentication. initially machine gets authenticated and then starts going MAB.
Authentication policy:
Allowed protocol = PEAP & TLS
Authorization Policy:
Condition for computer to be checked in external identity store (AD) = Permit access
Condition for users to be checked in external identity store (AD) plus WasMachineAuthenticated = permit access
All of the above policies do match and download the ACL from ISE but computer starts to mab authentication again...
Switchport configuration:
===============================================
ip access-list extended ACL-DEFAULT
remark Allow DHCP
permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps
remark Allow DNS
permit udp any any eq domain
permit ip any host (AD)
permit icmp any any
permit ip any host (ISE-1)
permit ip any host (ISE-2)
permit udp any host (CUCM-1) eq tftp
permit udp any host (CUCM-2)eq tftp
deny ip any any
===============================================
switchport config
===============================================
Switchport Access vlan 10
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 20
ip access-group ACL-DEFAULT in
authentication open
authentication event fail action next-method
authentication event server dead action authorize vlan 1
authentication event server alive action reinitialize
authentication host-mode multi-domain
authentication order dot1x mab
authentication priority dot1x mab
authentication port-control auto
authentication periodic
authentication timer reauthenticate server
authentication timer inactivity 180
authentication violation restrict
mab
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 100
====================================================
One more problem about the "authentication open" and default ACL. Once the authentication succeeds and per user is ACL pushed though ISE to the switch. The default ACL still blocks communication on this switchprort.
Your help will highly appreciated.
Regards,

You need to watch the switch during an authentication, see if the machine is passing authentication and the user may be failing authentication causing the switch to fail to mab. If your switch configuration is on auth failure continue to next method, then this makes sense. The question is why is the user failing auth but the machine is passing, could be something in the policy. Make sure your AD setup has machine authentciation checked or it may not tie the machine and user auth together and the user may be failing because ISE can't make that relationship so the machinewasauth=true is not beeing matched. Easy way to check is remove that rule from your policy and see if the same thing happens.
I've also seen this happen when clients want to use EAP-TLS on the wired, machines passes auth, then the user logs into a machine for the first time. The user auth kicks off before the user gets a cert and fails auth with a null certificate, since this is a auth failure the switchport kicks over to MAB.
I don't think wasmachineauth=true is that great, I prefer to use EAP-FASTv2 using Cisco Anyconnect NAM with eap-chaining. This is great because you can do two part authentication. EAP-FAST outer with EAP-TLS inner for the machine auth, and MSCHAPv2 for the inner of the user auth. You get your EAP-TLS auth for the machine and don't have to worry about a user logging into a machine for the first time and switching to MAB because the user doesn't have a cert yet. I also do my rule to say if machine pass and user fail, then workstaion policy, if machine and user pass then corp policy.

802.1x Authentication with Windows and MAC

Hello Team;
I have one SSID configured with 802.1x . The clients with Mac machines can directly join to the network by just entering the AD usrename and password. For the windows machines we need to do some configuration in the clients machines to work with the SSID.
Could you please clarify ? Whether the windows machines will just work like the Mac or the preconfiguration is mandatory to work windows with 802.1x.

Hello Sreejith,
As per your query i can suggest you the following steps-
No, the preconfiguration is not mandatory to work windows with 802.1x.To enable 802.1x authntication on wireless follow the steps-
1.Open Manage Wireless Networks by clicking the Start button , clicking Control Panel, clicking Network and Internet, clicking Network and Sharing Center, and then, in the left pane, clicking Manage wireless networks.
2.Right-click the network that you want to enable 802.1X authentication for, and then click Properties.
3.Click the Security tab, and then, in the Security Type list, click 802.1X.
4.In the Encryption Type list, click the encryption type you want to use.
On wireless networks, 802.1X can be used with Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) or Wi‑Fi Protected Access (WPA) encryption.
5.In the Choose a network authentication method list, click the method you want to use.
To configure additional settings, click Settings.
Hope this will help you.

Radius 802.1x authentication with computer AND users.

Hi !
I don't know if what I trying to do is possible so please excuse me if this sounds silly :)
I have a Cisco Wireless lan manager where I've configure 2 differents SSID's : COMPANY and COMPANY_mobiles.
What I want is to create a policy to restrict the access to the COMPANY SSID to only my company laptops with authenticaded users (both groups exists in the AD).
Therefore I created a new policy with the following conditons :
- NAS Port Type : Wireless
- Client IPv4 Address : <my cisco ip>
- Called Station ID : ^AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF:COMPANY$
- Users Groups : EUROPE\MY_USER_GROUP
- Machine Groups : EUROPE\Domain Computers
When trying to connect a notebook on windows 7 to that COMPANY ssid, I'm beeing rejected with the following error :
User:
    Security ID:            EUROPE\HOSTNAME$
    Account Name:            host/HOSTNAME.my.server.com
    Account Domain:            EUROPE
    Fully Qualified Account Name:    EUROPE\HOSTNAME$
Authentication Details:
    Connection Request Policy Name:    Secure Wireless Connections
    Network Policy Name:        Connections to other access servers
    Authentication Provider:        Windows
    Authentication Server:       My.radius.server.com
    Authentication Type:        EAP
    EAP Type:            -
    Account Session Identifier:        -
    Logging Results:            Accounting information was written to the local log file.
    Reason Code:            65
    Reason:                The Network Access Permission setting in the dial-in properties of the user account in Active Directory is set to Deny access to the user. To change the Network
Access Permission setting to either Allow access or Control access through NPS Network Policy, obtain the properties of the user account in Active Directory Users and Computers, click the Dial-in tab, and change Network Access Permission.
It therefore seems that it doesn't match my network policy and falls bacj to the default one.
If I remove the user rule, and let the computer rule : Connection OK
If I remove the computer rule, and let the user rule : Connection OK
but if I put both, i can't connect :s
Can someone help me with this issue ?
Thanks a lot !
Geoffrey

Hi Geoffrey,
I would like to know if
EAP-TLS wireless authentication has been used since it uses user and computer certificates to authenticate wireless access clients.
Please try to use NPS wizard to configure 802.1x wireless connection,
and
you will find that it
creates new connection request policy and network policy. Network policy NAS Port type will be "Wireless -Other OR Wireless -IEEE 802.11".If
you
need filter by user and computer account, the log should show both authenticate user and machine account name.
EAP-TLS-based Authenticated Wireless Access Design
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd348478(WS.10).aspx
Regards, Rick Tan

AAA with CatOS and ACS (shell command autorization set)

Hi,
I have an ACS that authenticates and authorizes IOS devices.
I use "shell command autorization set" to authorize some commands for some groups.
Is it possible to do so with CatOS?
For example, I'd like that the groupe FULL can access all command and the group LOW can onmy access "sho" commands?
Regards,
ROMS

Console> (enable) set tacacs server [IP] [primary]
set tacacs key [key]
set tacacs attempts [number] (optional)
set localuser user [user] password [password] privilege 15
set authentication login local enable
set authentication login tacacs enable [all | console | http | telnet] [primary]
set authorization exec enable tacacs+ [deny | none] [console | telnet | both]
set authorization commands enable [config | all] tacacs+ [deny | none] [console |telnet | both]
regards,
~JG

Machine authentication with MAR and ACS - revisited

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for