Manual depreciation and Planned but not posted depreciation forwarded

HI Expert,
We would like to request for Product Enhancement for Fixed Asset Module due to the inconsistency in the computation for the following:
u2022     The planned and un-posted depreciation is already considered as confirm transaction when they compute for the accumulated depreciation to be forwarded next year (as well as net book value beg for next year)
u2022     But as for the no of months (remaining life) u2013 it will only consider the no of posted months when they compute for remaining life of the asset
The current feature of SAP affecting our enhancement request is as follows
1) Manual depreciation is currently validates manual depreciation based on Planned depreciation instead of Posted depreciation
2) Remaining life computation for next year depreciation is based on posted transaction only
3) When user wants to fully depreciate the asset, we cannot post depreciation based on remaining un-posted depreciation using manual depreciation
Based on this feature we want to request for the following enhancement
1) For the remaining un-posted depreciation (especially if the previous year is already close), we should be able to choose which month we want to post the un-posted depreciation
2) Since the remaining life computation is based on posted depreciation only, 1) the validation and 2) the net book value forwarded next year should also be based on posted depreciation
We have a sample computation based on current feature VS the suggested computation for SAP. Is there any way for us to import the file here at the forum? We will wait for your advice
Regards,
Amy

Dear Kyriakos,
is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
Hope this helps,
Markus

Similar Messages

  • Depreciation planned but not posted.

    Hi all,
    There is the following case.
    In asset explorer there is planned depreciation which is not posted for prior year. I want to erase this planned depreciation (is incorrect) in prior year without affecting G/L. Could you please advise?
    If this is to be made with ABSO and specific transaction type, could you please tell me setup of the transaction type?
    Best Regards,
    Kyriakos

    Dear Kyriakos,
    is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
    If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
    If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
    Hope this helps,
    Markus

  • Parallel depreciation area 02 is not posted

    Dear Friends,
    I am getting the below error while posting un-planned depreciation
    "Parallel depreciation area 02 is not posted
    Message no. AA565
    Diagnosis
    The asset to be posted does not manage parallel depreciation area 02, or transaction type  that you are using is limited to certain depreciation areas, and does not contain depreciation area 02. This is incorrect.
    System Response
    Posting is rejected.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and the transaction type."
    I have checked all the relevant settings which might cause the above error, but, in vain.
    Parallel currencies for the Co.Code are configured:
    1st locl cur: INR; Type: 10 - Company code currency
    2nd locl cur: EUR; Type: 30 - Group currency
    3rd locl cur: USD; Type: 40 - Hard currency
    Transfer of dep terms, transfer of APC values & Identical terms for depreciation areas are seemed to be correct. config screen prints attached below.
    Still unable to trace out the root cause of this error.
    Kindly provide your inputs to solve this.
    Thanks,
    Kesav

    Hi Vivek,
    Thanks for your response.
    Parallel depreciation areas were deactivated earlier. I have activated them now. I also have inserted parallel dep areas through AFBN as they were missing in the assets.
    After the above changes, system allowed me to post unplanned depreciation.
    Regards,
    Kesav

  • Parallel depreciation area 99 is not posted

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to post a manual write up via AB01 with T.Type 700 and it is giving a below error message. Both are using different COD. Please advise
    Thank you
    Any solutions
    Regards
    Bali
    Parallel depreciation area 99 is not posted
    Message no. AA565
    Diagnosis
    The asset to be posted does not manage parallel depreciation area 99, or transaction type  that you are using is limited to certain depreciation areas, and does not contain depreciation area 99. This is incorrect.
    System Response
    Posting is rejected.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and the transaction type.
    Edited by: Bali1972 on May 23, 2008 3:32 PM

    this t. ype do work in COD USD but not in USD2. Please advise what are i am missing here
    Regards
    Bali
    I checked the answer provide by yourself and
    1) your first reply - it look exactly same as you advise
    2) Also check the T.code OAXE and maintain the t.type 700 to dep area 99
         The T. Type 700 is assigned to COD GBP2 and only 01 is there with display selection.
    When I try to assigned Dep area 99 and error popped stated Transaction type 600: parallel depreciation area 98 is missing
    Please advise
    Regards
    Bali
    Edited by: Bali1972 on May 27, 2008 5:17 PM

  • Fixed asset Write up Error. ABZU(Parallel depreciation area 32 is not poste

    Hi Sap Gurus,
          I am running into an error when trying to post a write up via "ABZU". Here is the error message "Parallel depreciation area 32 is not posted". Message no. AA565.
    Diagnosis
    The asset to be posted does not manage parallel depreciation area 32, or transaction type  that you are using is limited to certain depreciation areas, and does not contain depreciation area 32. This is incorrect.
    System Response
    Posting is rejected.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and the transaction type.
    I tried "Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas" in t-code:OAXE for derpeciation area 01 and 32 but still i am getting the same error. I am using ttype:700. When i look into derpeciation tab in asset master record i have depreciation area 32 is there. Is there any configuration piece i am missing. We are using area 32 as IFRS in group which is copy of 01.
    Any help will be appreciate.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Babu

    Hi,
    There are the following reasons:                                                                               
    1) The wrong transaction type is being used.  Please verify that  you are using transaction type in the 700 series for your write-up.     
    2) The transaction type is restricted to certain depreciation areas.   In transaction OAXE the transaction type can be restricted to post  only to certain areas.  If the asset manages a parallel area you  have to extend the posting to include the parallel area.                 
    3) The asset was created before you introduced parallel currencies and  does not manage the parallel area.  In this case, the parallel  area must be created on the asset or the values need to be  transferred to a new asset that manages the parallel area.                       
    4) Transacion types 600 and 601 can only be used for assets that have a  calculation key in their depreciation area that allows no automatic  calculation (for example depr key MANU).  The unplanned transaction types however can be used with assets that  allow automatic calculation.                                                     
    You also need to verify that there are entries in Table ANLB for the  asset in question for the depreciation area. 
    5) Your company code uses parallel currencies (currency types 10-co.code  currency, 50-Index based currency, 30-Group currency...for example).  The assets created in this company code must have the depreciation areas for parallel currencies active. You can only do this in activating the depreciation areas with  parallel currencies for all the asset classes used in this company code.                                                                            
    Check transaction OAYZ to make sure the areas are activated for all  asset classes in the co.code.  If not, you will need to       activate these areas and ensure the asset has all areas assigned.                
    regards Bernhard

  • Parallel depreciation area 04 is not posted.(Assets)

    Hi All,
    I have found below mentioned error at the time of Advance knocking off.(F-54)
    Parallel depreciation area 04 is not posted.
    I have found below mentioned error at the time of Advance knocking off.
    The error message number :AA565
    The Asset to be posted does  not manage parallel depreciation area 04,or transaction type that you are using is limited to certain depreciation areas and does not contain depreciation area 04. This is incorrect.
    Please help out for this issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ram

    Hi Ram
    With regards to the issue, if you have activated the use of parallel currencies, all assets created in this company code must have the depreciation areas for parallel currencies active. You can only do this by activating the depreciation areas with parallel currencies for all the asset classes used in this company code. Check transaction OAYZ to make sure the areas are activated for all asset classes in the co.code . If not, you will need to activate these areas and ensure the asset has
    all areas assigned.
    Another reason why the error message appeared could be the asset was created before you introduced parallel currencies and does not manage the parallel area. In this case, the parallel area must be created on the asset or the values need to be transferred to new asset that manages the parallel area.
    I hope this information helps.
    Best regards
    George

  • Error: Parallel depreciation area 31 is not posted

    Hi experts,
    Hi have customized 5 depreciation areas:
    01 book depreciation in local currency
    30 deferred balance sheet in local currency (for different useful life)
    31 deferred balance sheet in group currency
    32 book depreciation in group currency
    60 derived depreciation area
    I specified that 30 will get values from 01; 31 will get from 30; 32 will get from 01; plus one derived for 01 and 30 difference.
    Then when I entered asset values in F-02 using transaction type 100, I get this error. Please help. Thank you.
    Parallel depreciation area 31 is not posted
    Message no. AA565
    Diagnosis
    The asset to be posted does not manage parallel depreciation area 31, or transaction type  that you are using is limited to certain depreciation areas, and does not contain depreciation area 31. This is incorrect.
    System Response
    Posting is rejected.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and the transaction type.

    Hi John.
    In "Specify use of Parallel Currency" setup your currencies type/Valuation view.
    In Currency Type/Valuation View, against area 31 maintain it for 31 (Group Currency Group Valuation) and against area 40 maintain 40 (Hard Currency). Transfer of Deprecation terms setup from Deprecation
    area “01”.  Setup like below.
    Now go to below
    Maintain your currency as per requirement and see if changes are updated as per above configuration (I mean valuation id is "01" for your depreciation area, try to execute your transaction and let me know if it’s working.
    After that go to define depreciation area and see if your depreciation area setting for 01, 31 and 40 is same. Please try to check in Sandbox first.
    Please mark it as correct if your problem resolves, so it would be useful for other as well.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sudhir Harale

  • 'Parallel Depreciation Area 41 is not posted'u200F

    I am trying to run the inflation program (TS J1AI), the problem is that I need the inflation area for the parallel currency (41) take the inflation information in parallel currency. When I run the batch the system shows me this message 'Parallel Depreciation Area 41 is not posted' Error: NA AA565'.
    My question is if it is possible to see the inflation in the parallel currency inflation area or this area is created only for tecnical reason?? if it is possible... how can I do it??
    Thanks,
    Cecilia

    Solved

  • What is the Impact of just parking invoice doc's, but not posting...

    I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
    1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
    2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
    3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
    4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
    Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
    Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.

    Hi,
    'the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose' and 'In future if we are planning to use any reporting from service provider', in this case of cause there will be a problem.
    But, what Service provider going to do with Parked doc? In future if they're going to post it?I mean if they are have accounts payable why they don't post it?

  • Applet, Netscape and Opera but not IE, encore

    I've got the following trivial applet that runs under Netscape and Opera, but not under IE. It's also at www.MartinRinehart.com as the ColorChooser choice. There's a half dozen Dukes from previous posts, and my sincere gratitude for anyone who can tell me what I need to do so IE doesn't say "Load: class CCApplet not found."
    import java.awt.BorderLayout;
    import java.awt.Button;
    import java.awt.Label;
    public class CCApplet extends java.applet.Applet {
         public void start() {
              Label l = new Label( "CCApplet!" );
              setLayout( new BorderLayout() );
              add( l, BorderLayout.NORTH );
              add( new Button("South"), BorderLayout.SOUTH );
    } // end of class CCAppletThe .class is in the same directory as the .html. Putting it in a .jar doesn't seem to matter. My IE runs other applets from the web, but not the ones I write. Thanks in advance.

    The applet runs for me in IE with 1.5.0_02, XP Pro (current updates), with class and html files in same directory.
    Check that everything in IE's Java Plug-in is valid and correct. Check IE's Internet Options.
    What JVM version are you wanting the applet to be able to run with? What does this statement mean? "...most visitors can use without knowing what a JRE is."
    To get greatest compatibility, use code that conforms to the 1.1 API, compile to that target version, possibly use the old 1.1 libraries, and then test each jvm. (BTW - Swing has limited compatibility - it isn't MS compatible, and wasn't [Sun] standard until jvm version 1.2.)

  • Page is working ok in chrome and IE but not working in firefox. jquery problem i guess

    http://184.170.251.149/raschet-shkafa-kupe
    this page is working correctly in chrome and IE but not working in firefox, i cant click and of the dropdown menus(ДСП, доличество дверей). it was working perfectly prior firefox 18. can you please fix the compatibility problem ?

    I was referring to the second page in my above post.
    I disabled JavaScript as a test after loading the page with JavaScript enabled and that worked.<br />
    I also get the selects to open if I right-click instead of left-click the select.<br />
    That way the select get selected (shows a focus ring) and after that left-clicking works as well .
    This assumes that JavaScript is monitoring the left-click, but that script no longer works properly.
    A good place to ask advice about web development is at the MozillaZine "Web Development/Standards Evangelism" forum.
    *http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=25
    The helpers at that forum are more knowledgeable about web development issues.<br>
    You need to register at the MozillaZine forum site in order to post at that forum.

  • Excise Invoices Captured but not posted.

    Hi,
    How can I see the list of all excise invoices that are captured but not posted. Also list of excise invoices that are cancelled.
    Regards
    Ayyallas

    Hi Ayyallas,
    Have you tried transaction J2IUN and using the button "Display pending invoice".
    You might also be able to see this in table J_1IEXCHDR with field STATUS.
    Hope this helps,
    Adam.

  • The calendar typeface is so dim, I can barely read it. Name of days and date, but not the items I put in. Apple says they have no fix. Anyone else have this problem? Any solutions?

    The calendar typeface is so dim, I can barely read it. Name of days and date, but not the items I put in. Apple says they have no fix. Anyone else have this problem? Any solutions?

    I agree and I found your post because I did a google search ical typeface dim.
    If I find anything out, I will post back here.

  • Sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted

    Hi,
    I run TBB1 - posted business transactions - all transactions posted
    when i run the tbb4 for product type 51a i got the following error
    sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
    Please see the image

    Hello, Krishna.
    You haven't posted flow types 1150.
    Please go to your transaction, select "Cash flow" tab, Choose layout "106 Posting view", select flow type 1150 (one from your first screenshot above - use flow type and date) and check "Posting status" field - what's inside (please, provide screenshot)?
    NA T2104
    Short Text
    Flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
    Diagnosis
    The corresponding flow is due before the accrual/deferral key date, but has not yet been posted; this may result in the incorrect amount of expenses or revenues being displayed in financial accounting.
    System Response
    The flow is treated by the accrual/deferral function as if were already posted, i.e. the related expenses or revenues are accrued/deferred, where appropriate.
    Procedure
    Post the flow to correct the amounts of expenses or revenues shown in financial accounting.

  • HT4753 would number automatically save an .xlsx file I opened and modified but not saved? I've lost a file with many edits...

    would number automatically save an .xlsx file I opened and modified but not saved? I've lost a file with many edits...

    kearly - thanks a million for posting both the question & the reply! I just unchecked that little box by accident, & couldn't figure out for the life of me how to fix it. Thanks again!!

Maybe you are looking for