Method BUS2012 - Release not executing in the workflow

hi all!
I hope you can help me out with the following:
I have created a workflow to release a PO. The approver will see a decision task with Approve and Decline. When he approves the PO, the workflow should release the PO in the background with the method BUS2012.RELEASE. The strange thing is when I test this method in SWO1, for my instance (my PO) and method Relase, I only have to enter the release code and I get the perfect returns (RELSTATUSNEW and RELINDICATORNEW).
When I have this task in my testworkflow (with only the RELEASE task) it get into ERROR with the following message Release outside field of responsibility W5 105.
I have searched within the OSS notes but nothing found, so I hope you can help me out!
Hope to hear from you soon!
Best regards,
Raj

Hi Rick,
There is no error in the workflow... Yes the workflow is completing...
Whenever the user Rejects the PR, the flow is not passing through the 'REJECTION_START' branch instead of that its going into the 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED' branch... This is the problem i am facing...
Why the 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED' event is called instead of 'REJECTION_START'...
Thanks,
Srikag
Edited by: SRIKAG on Nov 4, 2011 10:29 PM
Edited by: SRIKAG on Nov 4, 2011 10:34 PM

Similar Messages

SBL-DAT-00320: The specialized method 'Start' is not supported in the imple

Hi.
I have a problem. I can´t enter to siebel eCustomer for CME, looking for in the logs I found this message "The specialized method 'Start' is not supported in the implementation". I think this is because there is a workflow that is wrong.
also, there are lovs that don´t have values, or the query don't find datas.
Please, I need help.
Siebel eCustomer 8.1.3
novice

Hi everyone
I have the answer
We did some personalization rules, and this rules was wrong, so we desactivate and that was the solution.

I recieve the following error when running an executable ("This VI is not Executable. The full development version of Labview is required to fix the errors"

I recieve the following error when trying to build and run a labview executable. I am able to build the executable but when trying to run the executable, a pop up window comes up asking the user to select a dll. (please see screen shot attached). Once the DLL is selected, I get the error that This VI is not Executable. The full development version of Labview is required to fix the errors. (please see screen shot attached). I have also attached a snapshot of the project window.
I have the professional development system
I can run the main VI
all the required DLL's are in the dependencies section of the project window.
I am trying to find the root cause of this error but to no avail. can anyone give me a clue to what i am missing here. Any suggestions on where i should look to find the problem ?
Thanks in advance to all labview users for your help
Attachments:
project window.PNG ‏36 KB

other PNG
Attachments:
Broken Arrow on EXE.PNG ‏179 KB

Document in Process but not found in the workflow

Hi,
we have a document entered in purchasing and still in process but it is not found in the workflow, then it can't be approved by users.
help please, thanks.

You can try in test instance it first;
Run this script for your PO number, it will change the status from In Process to incomplete or Required reapproval,
then the PO need to be approved again, and you will be able to see it in the workflow
UPDATE apps.po_headers_all SET authorization_status = decode(approved_date, NULL, 'INCOMPLETE',
'REQUIRES REAPPROVAL'), wf_item_type = NULL, wf_item_key = NULL, approved_flag = decode(approved_date, NULL, 'N', 'R')
WHERE po_header_id= -Po header ID-
Hope it work

Forward button not appearing in the workflow inbox

Hi All,
We have an issue where a user says that the forward button is not appearing in the workflow inbox . This is happening only for one user. Is there an way through which we can add the forward button?
Regards
Archana

Hi Archana,
If Basis have confirmed that the user has the authorization, then the user should be able to forward tasks.
Right click on a task in the inbox, it should allow the user to forward the task.
If the user does not have the authorization, then a message will appear that user does not have authorization to forward tasks.
Immediately after that take a screen shot of SU53, which will show you why task forwarding is not possible.
Regards
Srinivas

The VI is not executable. The full development version...

"The VI is not executable. The full development version of LabVIEW is required to fix the errors." That is the error I've been dealing with all day. Actually it is repeated 3 to 4 times in the error message, seen when first launching the EXE. Also of note is that the run-arrow is broken. This is in an EXE that was developed well before version 2013, but I recently upgraded it to 2013 to hopefully fix some random LVRT crashes. There is obviously no issue running the code on my development machine, only once it's deployed.
The good news is I've been able to solve the problem (mostly). My EXE now runs without the errors. I found that the problem wasn't actually in the EXE.
We have a separate project with no files, but in the build specification we have the LabVIEW 2013 Run-Time Engine, as well as NI-VISA for serial support. We then bundle the deployment in a self-extracting RAR and it does its business. In the past this has worked just fine, but with LV2013, it seems that there is a component missing from the deployment.
I found that if I download the Run-Time Engine directly from NI.com and run it, the only things I need to install are the Run-Time Engine, and the DEPLOYABLE LICENSE. If I do this, my EXE runs great, but with the custom installer, it is not included for some reason!
Putting aside the fact that I don't know why the Deployable License package is needed (we aren't connecting to remote panels), I can't seem to modify my custom installer to install the Deployable License. There are versions for LabVIEW 2009 and 2011 SP1 in the Additional Installers list, but I don't see 2013.
Can anyone explain why this is??? For now I will just distribute the 257MB Run-Time Engine and the NI-VISA installers separately I guess. But I'd really like to get back to a single, simple package to install all the prerequisites we need. HELP!

iannicholson wrote:
Yes, but then every installer I build will contain the runtime engine. That gets very large very quick. So I have an installer for JUST the runtime engine and VISA runtime.
Just remove them from the "Additional Installers" tab of the Installer dialog.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Result handler of a remote call not executed till the other remote calls get result

I have 3 remote calls in sequence.
Say RemoteCall1, RemoteCall2 and RemoteCall3. RemoteCall1 takes the least time say 5 seconds to get results. RemoteCall2 also 5 seconds and RemoteCall3 takes 30 seconds. But the resulthandler for RemoteCall1 does not execute till the RemoteCall3 gets results from server. Any fixes to call resulthander for RemoteCall1 as soon as it gets result without waiting for RemoteCall3 results.
by the way I am usindg Robotlegs framework and AsyncToken.

Don’t make remoteCall3 until you get the results from remoteCall2, etc. That’s the only way I know to guarantee order.
Fllash queues up all remote calls until the end of the frame and sends them all at once, although a network monitor should show that the go out in the order you made the calls.
Similarly, Flash processes all available results at the end of a frame. Results are asynchronous, but if all three results arrive in the same frame, they will all get deserialized. And, the server may not be guaranteed to return results in the order requested, especially if different servers are handling the individual calls.
I’m not sure if your time to get results is gated by server response or Flash processing the results. I suspect it is the latter. You also have the option of changing the resultFormat to get something that doesn’t need processing like XML and process it later.

Please help suggestions for solving built-only compiler error: 'The VI is not executable. The full development version of LabView is required tofix this error.'

We have develoepd a software tool and build it on regular basis. It currently runs error free when compiled in the editor, but when we built it and run the executable stand alone we get the error.
'The VI is not executable. The full development version of LabView is required tofix this error.' plus a broeken error.
This menas an compiler error that is not present in the editor but in the stand alone version. We tried to identify errors as suggested in several posts in this forum, but so far unsuccesfull.
As the editor and its compiler do not see the error and are running fine and the stand alone version just syas 'find the error in the editor' in this case LabView is of no help.
Can anyone suggest a sensible or 'good practice ' way of searching for the source of this error?
Our project comprises hundreds of Vis over several libraries.
Thanks,
Chris

Thanks Craig for all your suggestions.
We seem to have located the problem in a new vi just added to the package causing conflicts by using the same vi names as other vis already present in the package. Excluding this vi removed the error.
It seems related to a conflict by having two vis with the same name, which was mentioned by LabView and interactively resolved when running the main vi from the editor. When successfully building the main vi the builder did not mention this conflict and reported a successful build, but when trying to run the executable it gave the cryptic error. The error caused us problems because there was no hint for the cause, just the suggestion to solve this in the editor, while at the same time in the editor the VI was running fine.
We will post about this in detail after we have positively proven that this actually was the case.
The .net version issue was already checked.
Performance was the same on all machines we tested on including the dev machine.
Debugging was tried nut did not help as the vi could not run (broken arrow). We assumed that debugging only helps in running faulty functioning vi''s. We did not check for broken arrows in sub-vis (after connecting), that could have helped, although our application has hundreds of our own vis.
In relation to your remark:
'Are you using many classes? Have you verified that the proper access scopes are set for functions calling those vis?'
Could you elaborate on setting access scopes. We were not aware of this option in LabView, although we realize this is a basic element of the underlying c code.
Ragrds,
Chris

Method in WF not executing..

Hi, Can anyone tell me whether to include Delegated Object (ZDISCON) or Standard Object(DISCONNECT) in the activity step type of my Workflow (WS9000009).
The issue is:
The reciever is being called while trying to create a event in SWUE. But the Function module inside the ZDISCON is not executing.
BEGIN_METHOD CREATE CHANGING CONTAINER.
DATA:
   DISCONNECTIONREASON LIKE EDISCDOC-DISCREASON,
   REFERENCEOBJECT TYPE SWC_OBJECT,
   REFOBJTYPE      LIKE EDISCDOC-REFOBJTYPE,
   REFOBJKEY       LIKE EDISCDOC-REFOBJKEY,
   ETYPE           LIKE REGEN-EXIT_TYPE,
   WEDISCDOC       LIKE EDISCDOC,
   setexitreturn   LIKE regen-kennzx.
   SWC_GET_ELEMENT CONTAINER 'DisconnectionReason' DISCONNECTIONR
   IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
     EXIT_RETURN '0002' 'DisconnectionReason' SPACE SPACE SPACE.
   ENDIF.
   SWC_GET_ELEMENT CONTAINER 'ReferenceObject' REFERENCEOBJECT.
CALL FUNCTION 'ISU_S_DISCDOC_CREATE'
     EXPORTING
           X_DISCREASON   = DISCONNECTIONREASON
          X_REFOBJTYPE   = REFOBJTYPE
          X_REFOBJKEY    = REFOBJKEY
          X_UPD_ONLINE   = 'X'
     IMPORTING
         Y_EXIT_TYPE    = ETYPE
          Y_NEW_EDISCDOC = WEDISCDOC.
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_SEND_MAIL'
   EXPORTING
     DISCNO        = WEDISCDOC-DISCNO.
ENDMETHOD.

Hi,
If you Delegate the Custom BO to Std. BO, you can use the std. BO then custom BO methods will automatically come.
The reciever is being called while trying to create a event in SWUE. But the
Function module inside the ZDISCON is not executing.
This happen because Delegation is not correct.
Refer this [Link1|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/JQD1Aw ] & [Link2|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/8YBVAw ] for delegation.
Regards,
Surjith

BOR BUS2012 released not working

hi people
I have a problem in a workflow. The initiating event of the workflow is when a PO is released. I've tried the BOR BUS2012 released but the workflow does not start when I release the PO. The workflow is active and should work. Can anyone help me?
best regards

Thank you very much for replying.
Now it is working.
Previously BUS2012 is triggering twice. To stop this I deleted change document from SWEC. After that it is working fine. I donu2019t what happened suddenly it is not triggering for single time also. Now again I created a change document. Now it is triggering. Why it is behaving like this I unable to understand.
But my problem is solved.

How to use the method for field-exit to trigger the workflow?

Dear all,
     I want the workflow to trigger , when ever the check box for DELIVERY COMPLETED is checked in ME22N .
     I have developed a method in SE18 for the corresponding field and defined function module SWE_EVENT_CREATE with BOR bus2012 and event CHANGED.
    Now how to use this method to make my workflow to trigger?Shall I create an event in delegated bus2012 and can I call this method?
Thanks and regards,
S.Suresh

Hi
You want to place your method which is defined for particular filed.right?
For that you can go for BADI. First you check whether any badi is getting called form that tcode ME22N. Then to place your method, implement that BADI. So whenever that BADI is getting called, it will call your event. Through Event workflow will be getting triggered.
Regards,
Hemalatha.

Approval status not captured in the workflow...

Hi,
In my 4 tier approval workflow, I have a user decision loop , before which a user decision step is there for approve or reject.
There are two paths under user decision, one says when reject or approve and another says till last layer which then leads to container operation to collect the next level of agent.
Under when reject or approve step, there is a condition step that checks if user has approved or rejected.
Now I need to store in a custom table status R if rejected , status A if approved.
So I have added 2 steps under each path (approve and reject), but it so happens that when the first tier agent rejects it, the status gets recorded in the custom table but when he approves it , A status is not updated.
If the first agent approves and second one (final) approves only then A is updated.
I want the status to be recorded like this
agent1     Submitted for approval
This should change to agent 1    approved and then another entry should be added in the custom table with submitted for approval for agent 2.
My code is in a custom class and it looks fine as it wors for submitted for approval as well for reject. But not for Approved. Container objects in both reject and approve are same except that I pass A or R.
What can be wrong ??
thnks

HI
First let me give a breif explanation about how and where the result of the decision step is captured.
While creating a decision step in the workflow you would be giving some texts for each outcome, let say in your case you said that For both approve and reject you are using one branch (Assume that id of this branch is 0001) now the other branch is for reading the next level agent (0002) so now when you click on the first button then the Decision workitem standard container element WIRESULT will be populated with 0001 and let say if you clcik on the second button to read the next level approver then WIRESULT will be populated with 0002..
    Here your design is conflicting ( Assuming that what I said above is what you have implemented) Instead what you can try to do is Just have two outcome in the decision step as 1. Approve(0001) 2. Reject (0002) , now two braches will be coming out of decision step , now getting the next level agent keep it in a different background task, by creating a separate BOR method. Insert this task in both the branches.....
The remaining activities what ever you are perfoming to update the table you do it normally... as you did
Regards
Pavan
Edited by: Pavan Bhamidipati on Dec 7, 2010 11:05 AM

Method Implementation does not exist in the SWO1.

Hi,
If the definition of the method in the business object does not exist in the Business Object, where all the places the system will try to find & execute the code. For ex: we have a method(custom method) in the YBUSXXXX business object. But when we double click the method , we get the screen where we have 3 tabs, General/Result Type/ABAP tabs. In the ABAP tab, the radio button 'Other' was selected. I did not find the code for this method. If the code does not fins here, where system will find dynamically & excute that code. & how can I see that code? Pls help.
Thanks,
Pandu
Moderator message : Duplicate post locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Oct 5, 2011 9:43 AM

See the below link
The work book does not exist in the document store
Regs
Gopi
Assign points if it is useful

Maintenance Plan - Tasks are not executing in the order they were created

I've created a new maintenance plan to perform differential backups but the tasks I created don't necessarily seem to execute in order all the time. These are the tasks and order assigned when I created the plan using the Maintenance Plan Wizard:
Back Up Database (Differential)
Clean Up History
Maintenance Clean Up Task
Here's the deal...When it executes in the order they were created (above), all my old backups are deleted successfully. However, there have been instances where, for example, the Maintenance Clean Up task executes before the
Clean up History task. When this happens, only one of my backup files is deleted successfully but not the second (I have two .bak files needing to be removed). Furthermore, I noticed that the backup that wasn't deleted when it should
have gets deleted at the next increment when new backups are created.
Again, this does not happen when the tasks run in the sequence shown above. Only one old backup gets deleted (instead of two) when one of the above item is out of sequence. Strange behavior to say the least.
Any feedback on this will be appreciated!

If you do not set up precedence constraints it runs all tasks at the same time.
Please see "8. To define a workflow between tasks:"
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh710041.aspx

Verifying the Workflow Configuration - does not appear for the workflow services.

hi!
the services for the workflow services is not in windows service, I´ve installed workflow manager and correctly configured, service bus correctly configured etc
verify

Which self Service function you are using to change the assignment ?
Their are two API to update asg values. Try to apply user hook on both of them and retry ur scenario.

Method BUS2012 - Release not executing in the workflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for