Out of the box execution plan for Payables EBS 11.5.10

Has anyone else experienced performance issues with the out of the box execution plan for the Payables subject area for Oracle EBS 11.5.10? Our incremental ETL for this particular subject area is taking 8+ hours. I understand that there are several factors involved with performance and that there are a lot of AP transactions, but this is ridiculous for a nightly incremental ETL job.
In particular it is the SDE_ORA_APTransactionFact_Payment task that is taking forever. This query appears to have extremely high cost (see explain plan below). Has anyone been successful in rewriting or changing this query?
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 586,953 Bytes: 16,550 Cardinality: 50
            13 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 586,953 Bytes: 16,550 Cardinality: 50
                        10 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 586,952 Bytes: 15,800 Cardinality: 50
                                    7 HASH JOIN Cost: 468,320 Bytes: 11,693,526 Cardinality: 59,358
                                                5 HASH JOIN Cost: 429,964 Bytes: 9,200,490 Cardinality: 59,358
                                                            3 HASH JOIN Cost: 366,009 Bytes: 7,740,544 Cardinality: 60,473
                                                                        1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AP.AP_AE_LINES_ALL Cost: 273,240 Bytes: 15,212,604 Cardinality: 230,494
                                                                        2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AP.AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS_ALL Cost: 45,211 Bytes: 715,512,860 Cardinality: 11,540,530
                                                            4 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AP.AP_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALL Cost: 39,003 Bytes: 309,648,420 Cardinality: 11,468,460
                                                6 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AP.AP_CHECKS_ALL Cost: 28,675 Bytes: 130,126,920 Cardinality: 3,098,260
                                    9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AP.AP_INVOICES_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 119 Cardinality: 1
                                                8 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AP.AP_INVOICES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                        12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 15 Cardinality: 1
                                    11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_HEADERS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1

Hi Srini, All,
Thanks for the reply.
The payables documentation (i.e. User Guide) discusses about options that could be used in implementing EFT. However, if possible, we would like suggestions on what would be the better ways to implement EFT (US bank) using either XML or text formats. We would also prefer not using e-commerce gateway or EDI.
Thanks in advance.
MM

Similar Messages

Any "out of the box working" distro for W500

I'm interested in finding out whether anyone got any distro to work "out of the box" including graphics and wireless on a W500.
Mint 6.0 and Mandriva 2009 were a no-go in this respect.
I know they can be tweaked, but have a very specific reason for not wanting to tweak them on this occasion.
Any real-life experience and pointers (even in the respect of "I've tried this one and it didn't work") will be highly appreciated.
Cheers,
George
In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
Collecting dust: T60
Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

I can't say for sure but I don't think I had to do anything but disable switchable graphics to get Open Suse 11.1 to work "out-of-the-box" on my w500 (btw I use the intel-graphics).
Couldn't get the integrated 3G-modem (Ericsson F3507G) to work though until I had booted into Windows and installed the latest drivers and used it in Windows. Now that works just fine as well.
Haven't even tried to get the fingerprint-reader to work, since I don't use it.

Is it possible to change out of the box Callout content for already existing library using some javascript API ?

Is it possible to change out of the box Callout content (change DOM elements) for already existing library using some javascript API?
API ?

Hi,
We can use CSS and jQuery to achieve it.
Please add the following code into the Content Editor Web Part.
<style type="text/css">
.js-callout-content{
display:none;
.js-callout-mainElement span{
display:none;
.js-callout-mainElement{
border-width:0px;
</style>
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.10.2.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function () {
$("a[title='Open Menu']").click(function(){
setTimeout(function(){
$(".js-callout-body .js-callout-bodySection").eq(0).html("<span>Test</span>");
$(".js-callout-mainElement span").show();
$(".js-callout-content").show();
$(".js-callout-mainElement").css("border-width","1px");
},1000);
</script>
Result:
Best Regards
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

What's the best out-of-the-box web interface for a SQL DB?

I'm developing a Java web application that will be backed by an Oracle database. Users would like a simple web interface that allows them to accomplish what they could with SQL queries without knowing SQL. The basic operations would be:
* displaying a database table in a table format
* downloading the table as a text or Excel file
* customizing the columns in a table display
* displaying a query result set in a table format
* constructing a query using drop-down menus
I'd probably want to program in a simplified UI for a few common queries.
This really looks like functionality someone should have invented before me. Question: what is the right tool for me to be using? I'm surprised I haven't found something by searching.
It looks like I could just directly write JSP, but I think something else might be simpler. I think related functionality exists in Spring, but I didn't find exactly what I'm looking for, and Spring brings a lot of other stuff also. Nothing in my application is more complicated than this, so I'd be happy to keep things simple.
How would you write this?
Edited by: 1010007 on Jun 5, 2013 7:22 AM

Welcome to the forum!
>
I'm developing a Java web application that will be backed by an Oracle database. Users would like a simple web interface that allows them to accomplish what they could with SQL queries without knowing SQL. The basic operations would be:
* displaying a database table in a table format
* downloading the table as a text or Excel file
* customizing the columns in a table display
* displaying a query result set in a table format
* constructing a query using drop-down menus
I'd probably want to program in a simplified UI for a few common queries.
This really looks like functionality someone should have invented before me. Question: what is the right tool for me to be using? I'm surprised I haven't found something by searching.
It looks like I could just directly write JSP, but I think something else might be simpler. I think related functionality exists in Spring, but I didn't find exactly what I'm looking for, and Spring brings a lot of other stuff also. Nothing in my application is more complicated than this, so I'd be happy to keep things simple.
How would you write this?
>
I wouldn't write it. I would just use Oracle's FREE Apex application which does all of that and more and is fully supported even on Oracle's FREE Express edition data database.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/apex/overview/index.html
>
About Application Express
Oracle Application Express (Oracle APEX), formerly called HTML DB, is a fully supported "no-cost" option of the Oracle Database. Oracle Application Express is certified against all editions of the Oracle Database 10.2.0.3 and above, including Oracle Database 10g Express Edition (Oracle XE).
Oracle Application Express installs as part of the seed database installation with Oracle Database 11g.
>
The feature page (http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=4600:6:0) describes some of the major features of Apex
>
Browser Based
Using only a Web browser and limited programming experience you can develop data centric applications in minutes. Browser-based development enables you to develop applications on most computers using only a modern Web browser.
Rapid Application Development (RAD)
Use simple wizards and declarative programming to create powerful reporting and data entry applications. You can create applications from spreadsheet uploads, or on existing database tables and views. Oracle Application Express includes SQL Workshop to create and manage the database objects that support your application.
Application Express Components
Application Builder - Database Applications
Application developers use wizards to declaratively assemble applications organized in pages. Page content is organized into regions. Regions can contain text, custom PL/SQL, reports, charts, maps, calendars, web service references or forms. Forms are made up of fields (called items) which can be selected from the multitude of built-in types (such as text fields, text areas, radio groups, select lists, check boxes, date pickers, and popup list of values) or a developer can create their own types using plug-in support. Table update functionality is built-in and PL/SQL can be used to process data. Session state (or application context) is transparently managed and the user interface presentation is separated from the application logic so that the look and feel of an application can be changed simply by selected a different theme.
Application Builder - Websheets
Using Websheet Applications, end users can manage structured and unstructured data without developer assistance. Page sections contain unstructured data and are edited using a WYSIWYG editor. Reports provide access to database data by writing SQL. Data Grids can manage structured data without writing SQL. Adding columns, renaming column, and validations are defined using runtime dialogs. Each page and row of data grid data can be annotated with files, tags, notes, and links. Pages can contain sections as well as reports and data grids and all can be linked together providing navigation. All information is searchable and completely controlled by the end-user.
SQL Workshop
The SQL Workshop provides tools that enable you to view and manage database objects. Object Browser enables you to use a tree control to view object properties and create new objects. The SQL Command tool enables you to enter ad-hoc SQL. Query Builder enables you to create join queries using drag and drop. SQL Scripts enables you to store and run scripts. The Data Workshop enables you to load and unload text, DML, and spreadsheet data.
RESTful Services
RESTful Services allow for the declarative specification of RESTful services mapped to SQL and PL/SQL.
Team Development
Team Development helps manage the life-cycle of an application's development. It provides tracking and management of application features, to do entries, bugs, and end user feedback. Team Development is tightly integrated with the Oracle Application Express Application Builder. For example, edit page lists open feedback, bugs, and to do's.
Administration
Each Oracle Application Express workspace is a separate application development environment that is fully insulated from other workspaces. The administration component provides workspace management, including services (available schemas, space requests, and preferences), users (both developers and end-users), and workspace activity (page views, login attempts, and developer activity). Access is limited to Oracle Application Express developers who have workspace administration privileges.

How to capture the execution plan for a query

HI All,
Can anyone please help me in finding out the command to capture the execution plan for a query.
Execution plan for select * from EMP where <Condtions>
it is getting executed successfully but i need to get the proper execution plan for the same.
Thanks

971830 wrote:
i want to know where execution plan gets generated??
in PMON of server process or in shared pool??
i know that optimixer create execution plan..It is stored in Library Cache (present inside Shared Pool ).
select * from v$sql_plan;An absolute beautiful white paper :
Refer this -- www.sagelogix.com/sagelogix/SearchResults/SAGE015052
Also -- http://www.toadworld.com/KNOWLEDGE/KnowledgeXpertforOracle/tabid/648/TopicID/XPVSP/Default.aspx
HTH
Ranit B.

Different execution plan for same query but for different condition value

Hi All,
I'm facing a strange situation where same query for different condition not working.
1--
Select top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock)
where feecode ='OW4'
2--
Select top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock)
where feecode ='BTE'
1st query is returning result easily but 2nd query is taking too long. Column
feecode has already Non-clustered index and Clustered index is also available for another col RevenueSID.
I was surprised when checked the query execution plan for both the above queries which is quite different (as per attached below). Can anyone suggest me the reason behind it.
And solution for the same. One more thing that data for feecode BTE is inserting through different source instead of others feecode and table contains more than 300 million rows.

When I speak with people inside Microsoft who work with the optimizer, the refuse to accept the work "bug" when a query produces the correct result, but with a suboptimal plan. They prefer to use the word "limitation".
The limitation here is that when the optimizer compares two plans, it only looks at the estimated cost. As far as I know, it does not perform any analysis from the perspective "what if the statistics are wrong"? They do provide the hint OPTIMIZE
FOR UNKNOWN, but that does not work then there is a constant as in this case.
The optimizer will surely distinguish between TOP 10 and TOP 10000000. With the latter, you have all reason to expect a Clustered Index Scan no matter which value you search for - unless you pick a value for which the histogram indicates that there are no
rows.
Interesting enough, I was able to reproduce the situation in my Northgale database, which is an inflated version of Northwind, and where statistics should be accurate.
SELECT TOP 10 * FROM Orders WHERE EmployeeID = 8
results in a CI scan, and so does also EmployeeID = 7, and even 5. There are only 2292 rows out of a total of 344305 rows. If I try EmployeeID 808 for which there are 1797, the optimizer goes for the index seek.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Out of the box approval workflow suddenly failed on start (retrying)

SharePoint 2010. I've been using out of the box approval workflow for several month now. I did some minor changes to it, like to who and when emails should be send, but that's all.
Then out of a sudden it stopped working. New request status is "Failed on start (retrying)". Sometimes (!) status is "In Progress", but no tasks are created. In both cases there is nothing on workflow history and error report is also empty
(it even cause an error "Report contains no data").
I'm sure that I didn't change anything in a workflow. The only think that I changed was an InfoPath form, but I only added there field "Created By", so I would see in calendar later who created this request. I couldn't see how this might affect workflow
process.
I'm confused as I don't even know where to start searching for the solution. Why this might happen? Any ideas are very welcome!

In my list I have a multiple choice field which is not required. When it was
blank my workflow was failing on start! This field was not involved in a workflow directly, I included it only in the email to approver. When I deleted it from an email everything was fine.

Execution plans for a Query

Hi,
       As per documentation i learnt, For Every SQL statement i.e Executed , it will generate 23 Executions plan for a single query. The Runtime Engine will choose the Best Execution plan for Fetch Operation.
    In which Data dictionary view , do i have to check all those 23 Executions plans..
Thanks

startup wrote:
Hi,
       As per documentation i learnt, For Every SQL statement i.e Executed , it will generate 23 Executions plan for a single query. The Runtime Engine will choose the Best Execution plan for Fetch Operation.
    In which Data dictionary view , do i have to check all those 23 Executions plans..
Thanks
please post URL to document that says 23 Execute Plans are generated.

Multiple Executions Plans for the same SQL statement

Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.
Below is the awrsqrpt's output for your reference.
WORKLOAD REPOSITORY SQL Report
Snapshot Period Summary
DB Name         DB Id    Instance     Inst Num Release     RAC Host
TESTDB          2157605839 TESTDB1               1 10.2.0.3.0 YES testhost1
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:     32541 11-Oct-08 21:00:13       248     141.1
End Snap:     32542 11-Oct-08 21:15:06       245     143.4
   Elapsed:               14.88 (mins)
   DB Time:               12.18 (mins)
SQL Summary                            DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
                Elapsed
   SQL Id      Time (ms)
51szt7b736bmg     25,131
Module: SQL*Plus
UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL,
0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND TEST_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE
TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )
SQL ID: 51szt7b736bmg                  DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> 1st Capture and Last Capture Snap IDs
   refer to Snapshot IDs witin the snapshot range
-> UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(AC...
    Plan Hash           Total Elapsed                 1st Capture   Last Capture
#   Value                    Time(ms)    Executions       Snap ID        Snap ID
1   2960830398                 25,131             1         32542          32542
2   3834848140                      0             0         32542          32542
Plan 1(PHV: 2960830398)
Plan Statistics                        DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
   into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name                                Statement   Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms)                            25,131       25,130.7     3.4
CPU Time (ms)                                23,270       23,270.2     3.9
Executions                                        1            N/A     N/A
Buffer Gets                               2,626,166    2,626,166.0    14.6
Disk Reads                                      305          305.0     0.3
Parse Calls                                       1            1.0     0.0
Rows                                        371,735      371,735.0     N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms)                         564            N/A     N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms)                            0            N/A     N/A
Application Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Invalidations                                     0            N/A     N/A
Version Count                                     2            N/A     N/A
Sharable Mem(KB)                                 26            N/A     N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation                    | Name            | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |                 |       |       | 1110 (100)|          |
|   1 | UPDATE                      | TEST            |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL          | TEST            |   116K| 2740K| 1110   (2)| 00:00:14 |
|   3 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT            |     1 |    26 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACCT_DT_ACC_IDX |     1 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Plan 2(PHV: 3834848140)
Plan Statistics                        DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
   into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name                                Statement   Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms)                                 0            N/A     0.0
CPU Time (ms)                                     0            N/A     0.0
Executions                                        0            N/A     N/A
Buffer Gets                                       0            N/A     0.0
Disk Reads                                        0            N/A     0.0
Parse Calls                                       0            N/A     0.0
Rows                                              0            N/A     N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms)                           0            N/A     N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms)                            0            N/A     N/A
Application Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Invalidations                                     0            N/A     N/A
Version Count                                     2            N/A     N/A
Sharable Mem(KB)                                 26            N/A     N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation                    | Name         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |              |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|   1 | UPDATE                      | TEST         |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TEST         |     1 |    28 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | TEST_DT_IND |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT         |     1 |    26 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | INDX_ACCT_DT |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Full SQL Text
SQL ID       SQL Text
51szt7b736bm UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL, 0) +
              NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL, 0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND PB
             RN_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )Your input is highly appreciated.
Thanks for taking your time in answering my question.
Regards

Oracle Lover3 wrote:
Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.If you're using bind variables and you've histograms on your columns which can be created by default in 10g due to the "SIZE AUTO" default "method_opt" parameter of DBMS_STATS.GATHER__STATS it is quite normal that you get different execution plans for the same SQL statement. Depending on the values passed when the statement is hard parsed (this feature is called "bind variable peeking" and enabled by default since 9i) an execution plan is determined and re-used for all further executions of the same "shared" SQL statement.
If now your statement ages out of the shared pool or is invalidated due to some DDL or statistics gathering activity it will be re-parsed and again the values passed in that particular moment will determine the execution plan. If you have skewed data distribution and a histogram in place that reflects that skewness you might get different execution plans depending on the actual values used.
Since this "flip-flop" behaviour can sometimes be counter-productive if you're unlucky and the values used to hard parse the statement leading to a plan that is unsuitable for the majority of values used afterwards, 11g introduced the "adaptive" cursor sharing that attempts to detect such a situation and can automatically re-evaluate the execution plan of the statement.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Image capture for web-browsers out-of-the-box -- really no hopes?

Hi all,
I planned to extend user's interface for my web2.0 app with a webcam. It looks for me like JMF is the only framework, which promises a multiplatform usage for web-surfers. Therefore, I tried some JMF code and some JMF samples already. However it looks for me now like one should rather forget about the installers providing an "out-of-the-box webcam support ready for housewives". I'd wish i am wrong.
Would you believe one can really make a simple installer enabling browsers like firefox, ie, safari and opera to upload a webcam snapshot by a single mouse click?
Thank you for your hints and comments,
have a nice day,
Valery.

hi cat2014,
Welcome to the forums and sorry to hear about your sound trouble.
To check what's going on, can you provide these additional info:
1. What's the model of your lenovo unit (eg. Y50-70)
2. When you play a music file (ie. iTunes or YouTube), is the volume fluctuating but there's no sound comming from the built-in speakers?
- Link to picture
If the speakers are enabled and the volume is fluctuating, this means that the sound adapter is okay and there's most likely a problem with the speakers. To check, try to:
a. Use an earphone or an external speaker and observe if you can hear a sound
b. Press the Windows Key +X and choose Device Manager. On the Device Manager window, navigate to Sound, video and game controllers and uninstall the sound adapter (ensure that you delete the device driver). When finished, do a scan for hardware changes. Windows will now use a generic sound driver and observe if you can how hear a sound from the built-in speakers
Let me know how it goes.
Regards
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

After the in place upgrade from SharePoint server 2007 to 2010, the out of the box approval workflow does not prompt for additional information after check in of a major version.

I think it has to do with the interaction between Word, InfoPath, IIS, and /or SharePoint, but I cannot put my finger on it. Maybe client integration or authentication settings? I have looked at it in wireshark
and have not seen anything glaring.
Steps to reproduce the (working) behavior:
Set up a document library in SharePoint 2010.
Under versioning settings, make the following changes:
Set Require Content Approval for submitted Items to Yes
Select Create Major and Minor (draft) versions
Set require checkout to Yes
Create an out of the box “approval” workflow with the following settings:
Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item.
I then create a new document. Save it. check it in. it is now version 0.1.
I then open it again. check it out. Make a change. Close and save it.
Check it in.
Publish major version:
At this point a screen is presented to me to enter workflow parameters. This screen comes up in Enterprise 2013 and MOSS 2007, but not the migrated version of 2010:
This is what I need help with. It should come up in 2010. To fix it in 2013, I had to change the IIS bindings to only have 1 entry for a port. I did this for 2010 and it did not work.
Any help or ideas is very appreciated. Thanks very much in advance.

Hi Chris,
According to your description, my understanding is that the approval workflow cannot work when the workflow was set to start to approve publishing a major version of an item after upgrading to SharePoint 2010.
I recommend to check the approval workflow in Workflow settings of the corresponding library to see if the Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item is checked.
For test, I recommend to create a new OOB approval workflow and set it to start to approve publishing a major version of an item in the same library to see if the workflow can work.
Thanks
Victoria
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Clean Install VS Time Machine for "out of the box" performance

Hi all ^^
Just under a year a go I made the leap of PC to Mac and have never looked back, im super happy with my Mac however I have been experiancing a decrease in performance since Ive been using it, back when I was using a PC I clean installed the OS once a year and then proceeded to add my files back, thus restoring my PC to full performance.
Ive been reading around these forums looking at Time Machine backups, hoping to see 'how much' gets restored when you perform a recovery from time machine, and from what I have read is that everything gets restored. So my question is purely for some advice and clarification
"If I want to restore my Macbook to its "out of the box" performance, Is it viable for me to use a Time Machine back up?"
if not
"If Time Machine Back ups wont help restoring performance, Would it be possible to Clean Install and then extract purely the Files from my TM Back up?" I read another user had issues, the Mac recognised the files belonged to another mac and he couldent use them.
So I wont waffle on any furthur, but im looking for the easist way to clean install or restore performance to my Mac, a long term solution I can use each year
Please and Thank you
Em

Thankyou for your answer
Im quite a clean freak when it comes to my PC, I keep my desktop bare, things I dont use remain unloaded.etc
I think as I am without a Defrag or Disk Clean up tool I feel abit helpless to maintain optimal standards. I not very experianced with the in's and out's of computers but all I really want on my Mac are my Files, Applications and the OS, nothing more.
I appreciate your time and experiance, so ild ask instead: In your experiance is it worth performing a clean install? I have hadly any junk on my Mac, and from the tone of your post you beleive a program such as MacKeeper would be sufficent?
Futhurmore a clean install once a year isnt worth it? I depend alot on what people have told me, so I may have fallen victim to a rumour :S

Why is my mac so slow i have cleansed and cleaned it is a 2010 mac mini i5 but it runs like a 20 year old pc i have only had it for a few months and it was straight out of the box

why is my mac so slow i have cleansed and cleaned it is a 2010 mac mini i5 but it runs like a 20 year old pc i have only had it for a few months and it was straight out of the box

I'm thinking that you have a > Mac mini (Mid 2011) - Technical Specifications because the 2010 model's only have Core 2 Duo processors and the 2011 had the first i5 processor.
2 GB of RAM is the minimum requirement for Mountain Lion, but it's hardly enough to really enjoy doing anything else.
see > Memory and Free Installation Guides for Apple Mac Mini
Plus I don't have any problems running Mountain Lion and a load of App's on my 2010 Mac Mini with 8GB of RAM.

Out of the box porlets for Content Management with BEA Portal

I am looking at BEA Portal for a simple Intranet site with some basic content management system capabilities. I would like to implement this without the use of a third party tool and wanted to know if there are any open source or out of the box BEA portlets/web-apps with basic CMS capabilities beyond what has been shown in the Portal tutorials around CMS. From doing the tutorials, I have learned how to manage content, and how to build a site from scratch to access the content using the <cm:> tags. However, without additional third party products such as Documentum or Interwoven, is there any free BEA/open source portlets to:
- Configure exposure of this content in a runtime framework? (ie content manager can expose new content from the repository by a configurable admin GUI, place where this content is on the page)
- Allow for a simple approval workflow where content that gets added to the repository by user A has to be approved by user B before automatically exposing?
Interested to know if custom portal type development is the only way to do these kind of simple functions, or third party product.

Hi,
Did you have a chance to look into WebLogic Portal 8.1 SP3? Check out the new Library Services features, which includes versioning and simple approval:
http://e-docs.bea.com/wlp/docs81/adminportal/help/CM_MAN_LifecycleOV.html
We also provide a few ootb portlets that allow users to interact with the CM system. Let us know if you have additional questions.
Best Regards,
--alex

Are there Apple translated (i18n) resource files ("out-of-the-box") for Objective C? In the SDK?

Hello, experts:
From previous experience, I know that both Adobe and Oracle provide some "out-of-the-box" translations for their respective UI language. I'm new to Apple development and Objective C and looking to determine if any such localization support is provided by Apple for Objective C. Hint: Thinking it might be either included in the SDK or downloadable but I could not find any such information. Does Apple provide any translated resources?
Thank you in advance for your help.

To follow up on Tom's advice, if you go directly to the downloads directory:
https://developer.apple.com/internationalization/downloads/
There are resource files meant to be used by the old AppleGlot that provide a lot of Apple's translations.

Out of the box execution plan for Payables EBS 11.5.10

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for