Problem with user exit EXIT_SAPLIEDI_001 for Inbound Idocs in replacing G/L

Hello all,
I am currently facing an issue where my IDOC where exit EXIT_SAPLIEDI_001 is not appearing to work properly.
Basically I am using the FM that processes the inbound idoc (IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_FI) to post an accounting document. We needed a solution where we need to substitute one of the G/L Accounts.
The current process in our SAP system is that we are creating a billing document which automatically generates the output type (running: program rsnasted subroutine edi_processing) to create and process the inbound idoc.
So I discovered FM EXIT_SAPLIEDI_001 which exports company code and G/L Account back does this.
In this exit, Since I needed to get data from the IDOC, I used the logic ASSIGN: ('(SAPLIEDI)IDOC_DATA[]') TO <fs_edidd> to get the DATA Records for further processing.
During the development and testing phase in the Sandbox system this works.
However when we moved this to production we encountered a situation where the G/L account was not being substituted so were assuming EXIT_SAPLIEDI_001 is not working properly. However when I reprocess this in production either by running the idoc with errors RBDMANI2 or BD87 the IDOC is properly posted and the G/L Account is substituted as well as if I try to repeat the output type of the billing document. So there are instances when in the actual business scenario it does not work except when I reprocess it.
I was wondering if there are any ideas why this could have happened?
Oh ... I also noticed when we transported the objects of the exit. When I try to double click the subroutine I made inside the exit it said the object does not exist. I had to generate the function group of FM EXIT_SAPLIEDI_001 in SE80 in production for it to reflect. I was wondering if this could have caused the issue.
Well I hope to hear from you.
Regards
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 6, 2011 1:03 PM

Hi,
Check in t.code CMOD whether project is active or not (Activate the Project)
BR,
Vijay

Similar Messages

MRP Run with User Exit key for Follow up material

Dear Gurus,
I want to run MRP only for followup materials by using User exit key. For example i have a material X(with discontinued Indicator as 1) and it's follow material is Y.
So we have a user exit key as ZFL, with coding as shown below. Now when i run MD01 with user exit key ZFL and parametre as 1, it only runs MRP for material X and not for material Y. What else we need to do so that when i run MD01 with user exit key ZFL, it shoudl consider both X and Y.
WHEN 'ZFL'.
DATA : BEGIN OF ITAB5 OCCURS 0,
KZAUS LIKE MT61D-KZAUS,
END OF ITAB5.
TRANSLATE USER_PAR TO UPPER CASE.
SPLIT USER_PAR AT ',' INTO TABLE ITAB5.
IF ITAB5[] IS INITIAL.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
CLEAR: NO_PLANNING, STOP_PLANNING.
READ TABLE ITAB5 WITH KEY KZAUS = MT61D-KZAUS.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
NO_PLANNING = 'X'.
ENDIF.

Hi Kumar,
You can use either MRP Type, MRP Controller, MRP Group in this user exit to control the MRP run. For these set of Materials you have to assign any of same value or at least differentiate these material from other material. Then only you can control the MRP by using this user exit even though if you use different MRP Group and MRP Controller. In User Exit, you may have to add your dependent material's MRP Group/MRP Controller. Make sure that these set of materials are different than all other materials.
If you don't have any plan to run MRP for other materials then as per Ajit suggestion you make that material's MRP type as "ND". But, in your business case they may want to activate the MRP for all the material not now but may be latter.
Thanks

User Exit / Badi after (inbound idoc) database commit

Hello Folks,
I want to know the User Exit/Badi that can be used after inbound idoc gets posted, as i want to use perform on commit statement.
Thanks & Regards,
Nishanth Kumar

Hi Sengupta,
Usually there are no user-exits after COMMIT.
What you need to do is register a call which will be executed after COMMIT, from one of the available user-exits.
To do this, SAP provides 2 methods:
1. PERFORM xxx ON COMMIT
2. Function Module with attribute "Update Module"
Check ABAP keyword help for more information for PERFORM xxx ON COMMIT.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/34/8e72cc6df74873e10000009b38f9b8/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/34/8e72cc6df74873e10000009b38f9b8/frameset.htm</a>
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sumant.
PS: Reward points if this is helpful.

Problem with User-exit

Hi,
I implemented userexit 'EXIT_SAPLEINM_001' for IDOC purpose . When i use Tr.code WE15 this userexit will be exectued. This is working fine in development server.
The problem is with quality server. When WE15 is executed, the control is stopping at CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '001'. But the control is not going into the INCLUDE program of the exit.
The user-exit is already in active state (checked in CMOD).
What could be the problem?
Points will be rewarded.
Thank you.
Ramesh

Hi Satish,
i tried doing this and also tried on different systems. Still the same problem.
actually i implemented 2 use exits. One is not working (as specified previously) but the other is working fine. Its allowing the control to enter into the include program. what could be the problem for the first one.
Thank you.
Ramesh

Numeric value variable problem with user exit

Dear experts,
I've created a variable (numeric value, user exit) and I want to get the value of variable from an user exit.
Actually, I want to convert "0calyear" to a number to be albe to calculate (multiplying, dividing etc).
If there is a possible solution only in FOX, the solution will be the best. However I couldn't find anything.
So, the next solution I am trying is user-exit. But I am in stuck here.
The problem is that I have no idea whether the numeric value variable has any sturcture like other variables(char. value) or not. If yes, what structure it has?
I know, the characterisc value variables have the structure as blow,
 ls_varsel-chanm =
 ls_varsel-seqno =
 ls_varsel-sign =
 ls_varsel-opt =
 ls_varsel-low =
I've tried several times with the same way like above, but it doesn't work when I call the variable in "BPS0" or "UPSPL".
How can I solve it? Please let me know.
I am using SEM_BW 4.00.
Many Thanks.
Bruce

Hi Ravi,
Sorry, there's a correction. var2 is used for getting the first month of the year selected by the user in var1. If the user doesn't enter a value for var1, then var2 should take first month of current year from var1 which has by default last month of current year (populated in i_step1 from sy-datum). The user can select the value of var1 according to his requirement. Then var 2 should get first month of the year selected. That's why I'm using two exit variables.
It works fine during the initial run of the query. But when the user clicks on the variable button in the toolbar and executes the query, var1 is not being displayed and an error message No value could be determined for var2 is shown. All other variables used in the query are displayed except var1.
Krzys, Is the option Can be changed in Query Navigation available for Exit variables. I'll check that and get back to you.
Boujema, Thanks for the OSS note.
Thanks
Hari

Problem with User exits when using custom fm

Hi everybody,
I am processing an IDoc using fm IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM. Nos I had to copy this to Z_...
And this fm has a sun-routine that calls User-exits. When I am using the standard fm, the UEs are being checked for active and executing the logic in the UE. But when I am processing IDoc using Z_...fm, the system is checking if the UEs are active. Its also active and now the cursor is coming to CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '014'. But here when I press F5 in Debug, the cursor moves to the next statement after this function call without executing the user- exits. I dont know why its not executing the UE.
Is there any setting that I need to make?
thanks in advance
kris

Hi Vamsi,
User exits are specific to the object they are included in. So when you have a "CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '011'" in IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM and when you have "CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '011'" in your Z function module, they are two different things.
The purpose of a user exit is that you can include your logic in there within the limits defined by the object and without repairing the system. If you copied it, then you don't need the user exit anymore, as that copied object is your custom object and you can incorporate anything you want within main source code itself. If you really thing you should have that user exit, then double click on the call function statement, the system will ask if you want to create the function module, say yes and proceed with the creation.
But I don't see any reason why you will copy a standard IDOC function module(while you could have used a user exit in there) and still want to use the user exit functionality. Once you copied, it is your object and you don't need a user exit to insert code into your own object.
Hope this is clear.
Srinivas

Problem with User Exit parameter in MD01

I have done the coding for user exit in MD01. But the exit is not being triggered even when the exit key is specified in the selection screen of the transaction.
I need to control the material being planned and restrict it to type ROH only.
Please help me... I need to do this fast

Hi Sultana,
The user exit key is stored in table T450U. But the user exit parameter is not stored. Instead, it is entered in the selection screen of MD01.
Also, You can check the following Transaction codes if they help you to solve yor problem:
MD20 - Create planning file entry
MD21 - Display planning file entry
MDAB - Set up planning file entry in background
MDRE - Check planning file entry
Hope it helps.

Problem with User exit variable

We're using an user exit variable (var2) for YTD calculation (For getting the first month of current year). It gets value from another exit variable (var1) which has by default value last month of current year(populated in I_step1 from sy-datum). If the user wants he can change the default value of var1. It works fine when the query is executed the first time. But if the user calls the variable screen again, the variable screen does not show var1 in the popup and the user gets an error message that no value could be determined for var2. How can this issue be resolved or is there any other method to satisfy this requirement.
Your help would be appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks & Regards
Hari

Hi Ravi,
Sorry, there's a correction. var2 is used for getting the first month of the year selected by the user in var1. If the user doesn't enter a value for var1, then var2 should take first month of current year from var1 which has by default last month of current year (populated in i_step1 from sy-datum). The user can select the value of var1 according to his requirement. Then var 2 should get first month of the year selected. That's why I'm using two exit variables.
It works fine during the initial run of the query. But when the user clicks on the variable button in the toolbar and executes the query, var1 is not being displayed and an error message No value could be determined for var2 is shown. All other variables used in the query are displayed except var1.
Krzys, Is the option Can be changed in Query Navigation available for Exit variables. I'll check that and get back to you.
Boujema, Thanks for the OSS note.
Thanks
Hari

Problem with user exit MBCF0002 EXIT_SAPMM07M_001

MBCF0002 Customer function exit: Segment text in material doc. item
EXIT_SAPMM07M_001
Issue: When the above user exit is activated (even without additions of custom coding), the MB31 item level free text field is not recorded upon saving. Without the user exit activated, the free text can be saved.
1) Go to MB31.
Enter movement type 101 and order number. Press enter.
2) Enter quantity and click on "adopt + Details" button.
3) Enter free text in the further information text field. Click Save.
4) Display the material document but the entered free text is missing and not recorded.

Hi tildveryn,
Are you from Amtek? I was working on the similar message previously.
Please refer to the KBA:
https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3135313835393226
Hope it helps.

Problem with User exit for Purchase Order creation/change

Hi Everyone,
I have a requirement where I have to implement an enhancement for the standard transaction(ME21N/ME22N). I need to modify a particular field of the item table (EKPO) based on a few comparisons from the header values (After save of PO). I am using the enhancement MM06E005 and its corresponding exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_013. While debugging I notice that the value is getting changed; but as soon as the control comes out of the FM, the change is not being reflected. Hoping to find a solution for this.
Thanks & Regards,
Indudhar P.G

Hi Guys,
Now I am using the BADI "ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST". But the control is not stopping at the method even though I set a breakpoint. It just saves the PO after I click save. Is this because my document type of PO is Stock Transfer Order. Can I use this BADI for STO's? and moreover how do I process each item line in this method. Does "ls_mepoitem = im_item->get_data( ).
" fetch all the item lines?
Thanks and Regards,
Indudhar P.G

User Exits BALE for inbound and DE_EIOUT without function

Hello,
we have implemented patches in our R3-system and now
the data-exchange of the fields 'parh1 - 5' of the cp is not yet done. We have implemented note620399 for processing additional fields from R3 to crm and backward.
I've checked tables TBE24/34, they are okay.
When I change a cp in R3, I get a flow in outboundqueue,
but the changes will not be made in crm.
Is there a possibility how I can see if the problem is in r3 or crm ?
Best regards
Gerd

Hello,
I've deregistered Outqueue in order to debug the luw, but it is very difficult to find some data.
There is no communicationproblem between r3 and crm, it works fine. I think the error must be in r3-system.
When we upgraded our system last year to ECC5.0 we had the same problem, then oss made some changes in
'FUNCTION: Z_SAMPLE_FCTMODULE_DE_EIOUT' , then it worked again. Now support does not support again, because of customer area, although the same was implemented by sap.
I've checked the function above, and when I change an additional field of a cp, the function is called and data is written into it. But now I don't know how I can see if the luw is correct or not.
Best regards
Gerd

User exit for inbound idoc

could anyone please tell the user exit for inbound idoc : ACC_POSTING_GL01

I thnk the inbound idoc name is ACC_GL_POSTING01. User Exit for this is EXIT_SAPLACC4_001.
*****Reward points if useful
Regards,
Kiran Bobbala

Problem with HU during creation of Inbound Delivery using IDoc

Hi,
When I am creating Delivery manually and perform Packing, Handling Unit information is stored in VEKP and VEPO tables.
But when I am processing through IDoc, after passing data to Handling Unit Segments E1EDL37 (Handling unit header), E1EDL39 (Control Segment for Handling Units), E1EDL44 (IDoc: Handling Unit Item - Delivery), It is creating delivery successfully but Handling Unit information is not getting stored in VEKP, VEPO tables.
Tried most of the notes 912470, 678464, 682506 and all of them say "You use the Idoc DESADV to create inbound delivery with packing data. The delivery is created, Idoc gets status 52 but the Handling Units (HUs) are missing. This is due to a program error. In case the IDoc contains segments to create HUs (E1EDL37), the IDoc processing should end in error status (51) as long as no packing data could be created.".
Need your advice whether we have to maintain any customizing for this or how to proceed with it.
Thanks in advance,
Murali.

IDocs and BAPIs sometimes behave differently than transactions. You might need to add a user exit specifically for IDoc processing. Otherwise send a message to SAP and have them look at it.

Please help me with user-exits or baids for TCode : FOE2 & FOE1

Hi Experts
Please help me with user-exits or baids for TCode : FOE2 & FOE1.
I found these but not picking values from VIMI01,VIOB03 and VIOB41.
User-exits
FVCH0001                                CH-specific enhancements: Esp. POR
ISRE0001                                Determine bank procedure account no.
ISRE0002                                IPD reporting data retrieval
Business Add-in
FVD_HANDLE_FORMULA                      Processing of Condition Formulas

Hi,
ASk your basis regarding the CI_CSKB table active issue, and first of all i dont see any table with the name CI_CSKB.
And check this exit-COOMKS03 whether it works for your screen exits.
Cheers!!
VEnk@
Edited by: Venkat Reddy on Nov 4, 2008 5:59 PM

Request for info. on USER EXIT/BADI for FB60

Hi,
This is with reference to FB60 user exit/badi for with holding tax.I want to use the customized table for withholding tax.
]Please guide some alternative solution rather than user exit and badi.
I dont think the following user exit and badi are used for withholding tax.
I done some analysies.I didnt find any user exit/badi related to withholding tax.I found the following
F050S001 FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Edit user-defined IDoc segment
F050S002 FIDCC1: Change IDoc/do not send
F050S003 FIDCC2: Change IDoc/do not send
F050S004 FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Change outbound IDoc/do not send
F050S005 FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc: Change FI document
F050S006 FI Outgoing IDoc: Reset Clearing in FI Document
F050S007 FIDCCH Outbound: Influence on IDoc for Document Change
F180A001 Balance Sheet Adjustment
FARC0002 Additional Checks for Archiving MM Vendor Master Data
FEDI0001 Function Exits for EDI in FI
RFAVIS01 Customer Exit for Changing Payment Advice Segment Text
RFEPOS00 Line item display: Checking of selection conditions
RFKORIEX Automatic correspondence
SAPLF051 Workflow for FI (pre-capture, release for payment)
Badi
FQST_CALC_COUNTRY,FQST_CIN_WITHITEM are related with withholding tax and they are for country specific such as India.
Every expert answer will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance
Cra

Try Business Transaction Events. Transaction code BERP.
Regards,
Zoltá

Problem with user exit EXIT_SAPLIEDI_001 for Inbound Idocs in replacing G/L

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for