Query not giving the correct result

select Project_id, contractno
from elf_transactions
where(rtrim(contractno),rtrim(project_id)) not in
(select rtrim(contractno),rtrim(projectid)
from contract_proj
where report_month='1-May-2007' )
when I m firing this query, it is not giving correct result to me, it also select the recorts which are matches in both the table
i want to fine out those contract, with projectid which are not in contract_proj table
Please help me in this regard

CREATE TABLE ELF_TRANSACTIONS
VENDOR_ORDER_REF VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
BT_SUB_CON_REF VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
PR_NO VARCHAR2(15 BYTE),
PO_NO VARCHAR2(15 BYTE),
PR_PO_DESCR VARCHAR2(200 BYTE),
ONE_IT_PROG VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
BT_DEL_MANAGER_NAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
DELIVERY_TYPE VARCHAR2(5 BYTE),
ACTUAL_DEP_DATE DATE,
ASSOC_ASG_BR_QUE VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
PRE_AVG_P1_P2_INC_CNT NUMBER(3),
POST_P1_P2_INC NUMBER(3),
PERC_GROWTH_POST_REL NUMBER(3),
VENDOR_DEL_MANAGER VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
REPORT_MONTH DATE,
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(200 BYTE),
PROJECT_ID VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
CONTRACTNO VARCHAR2(15 BYTE),
CONTRACT_TYPE NVARCHAR2(15),
IDUNO VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
STATUS VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
DESCRIPTIONCODEDELIVERABLE VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
UNIQUEID VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
LOCK_RECORD CHAR(1 BYTE),
VERIFIED CHAR(1 BYTE),
VERIFIED_BY VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
BT_VERIFIED CHAR(1 BYTE),
BT_VERIFIED_BY VARCHAR2(40 BYTE)
CREATE TABLE CONTRACT_PROJ
CONTRACTNO VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
PROJECTID VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
IDUNO VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
CH_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
CHNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
GH_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
GHNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
PM_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
PMNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
SPM_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
SPMNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
PRJ_MONTH DATE,
BT_CONTRACT CHAR(1 BYTE)
REPORT_MONTH     COMMENTS     PROJECT_ID     CONTRACTNO     CONTRACT_TYPE     IDUNO     STATUS     DESCRIPTIONCODEDELIVERABLE     UNIQUEID
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1287     TML007452               OPEN     Delivery of CRs DM CD and NSI     N/A
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1280     TML007452               OPEN     Delivery of CRs H&W OOR and WLTO     N/A
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1231     TML007452               OPEN     Delivery of CRs H&W OOR WLTO
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1097     TML007679               OPEN     High Level Roadmap for Global Services and Wholesale with Feasibility study into BTR access to Switc     N/A
06/01/2007 00:00:00          405     TML007942               OPEN     RTRCC DEVELOPMENT -Q107
06/01/2007 00:00:00          405     TML007919               OPEN     WLR3 DEVELOPMENT-Q107
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1170     TML008439               OPEN     R-510
CONTRACTNO     PROJECTID     IDUNO     CH_EMPID     CHNAME     GH_EMPID     GHNAME     PM_EMPID     PMNAME     SPM_EMPID     SPMNAME     PRJ_MONTH     BT_CONTRACT
MBT003060     176     BT06     8694     Soman Sameer Surendra     1054     Bhadti Shripad Shivram     1054     Bhadti Shripad Shivram     1420     Rao Darbhamulla Kameswara     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT003842     1156     BT12     19992     Kalle Ajit Ashutosh     1539     Padgaonkar Shailesh Vishwanath     13948     Khunte Milind Vasant     16426     Kulkarni Vinay     05/01/2007 00:00:00     Y
MBT004677     458     BT09     20275     Mundassery George     5044     Kamalapurkar Leena Shrinivas     12849     Dave Ajay Yogeshchandra     2017     KIRKIRE SONAL MADHUKAR     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004695     362     BT13     20276     Ghosh Sankar     2624     Avachat Jagdish Vasantrao     13592     Pal Sudipta     2624     Avachat Jagdish Vasantrao     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004826     VITRIA     BT09     20275     Mundassery George     26099     Saha Debendra Kumar     28134     Hinge Anand Sharad     12777     Karandikar Sumedh Vidyadhar     05/01/2007 00:00:00     Y
MBT004924     1027     BT03     1451     Tillu Ashirwad     15693     Devaraj Daniel G     6867     Jadhav Satyajit Ramesh     15693     Devaraj Daniel G     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004927     1025     BT05     4436     Kelkar Subhash Manohar     20379     Gore Sujeet Narayan     13704     Vignesh Chandrasekaran     4347     BIJNORI REHANA GULAMWARIS     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004927     1092     BT05     4436     Kelkar Subhash Manohar     15094     Jain Jitendra     13350     Bokil Shripad Raghunath     9511     Markande Balchandra Narayan     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004927     1213     BT09     20275     Mundassery George     19996     Vege Sridhar     16401     Sibgathulla Mohammed     19996     Vege Sridhar     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N

Similar Messages

Case condition is not giving the correct result in Union query

Hello PL/SQL Gurus,
I am using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production version
I have a table in following format -
drop table TT2;
create table TT2(FeeDate,Clerk,ClrComm,ExComm,TagComm) as select
20120102,'Mathews',25,56,245 from dual union all select
20120102,'Lika',0,56,245 from dual union all select
20120102,'Ram',0,0,245 from dual union all select
20120102,'Angilo',NULL,NULL,245 from dual union all select
20120102,'Nikki',225,NULL,245 from dual union all select
20120103,'Ram',NULL,556,2345 from dual union all select
20120103,'Lika',NULL,NULL,245 from dual union all select
20120103,'Mathews',25,56,245 from dual;DML Used -
SELECT FEEDATE,CLERK,SUM(ClrComm) ClrComm,null ExComm,null TagComm,sum(case when ClrComm>0 then ClrComm end) Comm
from tt2
group by FEEDATE,CLERK
UNION
SELECT FEEDATE,CLERK,null ClrComm,sum(ExComm) ExComm,null TagComm,sum(case when ExComm>0 then ExComm end) Comm
from tt2
group by FEEDATE,CLERK
UNION
SELECT FEEDATE,CLERK,null ClrComm,null ExComm,sum(TagComm) TagComm,sum(case when ClrComm=0 or ClrComm is NULL and ExComm=0 or ExComm is NULL then TagComm end) Comm
from tt2
group by FEEDATE,CLERKResult Output -
FEEDATE CLERK      CLRCOMM     EXCOMM    TAGCOMM       COMM
20120102 Angilo                               245        245
20120102 Angilo
20120102 Lika             0
20120102 Lika                       56                    56
20120102 Lika                                 245        245
20120102 Mathews         25                               25
20120102 Mathews                    56                    56
20120102 Mathews                              245
20120102 Ram            225                              225
20120102 Ram                         0
20120102 Ram                                  490        490
FEEDATE CLERK      CLRCOMM     EXCOMM    TAGCOMM       COMM
20120103 Lika                                 245        245
20120103 Lika
20120103 Mathews         25                               25
20120103 Mathews                    56                    56
20120103 Mathews                              245
20120103 Ram                       556                   556
20120103 Ram                                 2345
20120103 Ram
Output expected -
FEEDATE          CLERK     CLRCOMM     EXCOMM     TAGCOMM     Comm
20120102     Mathews     25     56     245     81
20120102     Lika     0     56     245     56
20120102     Ram     0     0     245     245
20120102     Angilo               245     245
20120102     Nikki     225          245     225
20120103     Ram          556     2345     556
20120103     Lika               245     245
20120103     Mathews     25     56     245     81I sincerely thanks to all of you for your effort in advance.

This way:
select feedate, clerk, clrcomm, excomm, tagcomm,
       sum(decode(nvl(clrcomm, 0) + nvl(excomm, 0), 0, tagcomm, nvl(clrcomm, 0) + nvl(excomm, 0))) over (partition by feedate, clerk) comm
from tt2
order by feedate, clerk;
FEEDATE                CLERK   CLRCOMM                EXCOMM                 TAGCOMM                COMM
20120102               Angilo                                                245                    245
20120102               Lika    0                      56                     245                    56
20120102               Mathews 25                     56                     245                    81
20120102               Nikki   225                                           245                    225
20120102               Ram     0                      0                      245                    245
20120103               Lika                                                  245                    245
20120103               Mathews 25                     56                     245                    81
20120103               Ram                            556                    2345                   556
8 rows selected

TABLE(CAST()) function not returning the correct results in few scenarios.

I am using TABLE(CAST()) operation in PL/SQL and it is returning me no data.
Here is what I have done:
1.     Created Record type
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE target_rec AS OBJECT
target__id          NUMBER(10),
target_entity_id NUMBER(10),
dd           CHAR(3),
fd           CHAR(3),
code      NUMBER(10),
target_pct      NUMBER,
template_nm VARCHAR2(50),
p_symbol      VARCHAR2(10),
pm_init          VARCHAR2(3),
target_name     VARCHAR2(20),
targe_type     VARCHAR2(30),
target_caption     VARCHAR2(30),
sort_order      NUMBER (4)
2.     Created Table type
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE target_arr AS TABLE OF target_rec
3.     Created Stored procedure which accepts parameter of type target_arr and runs the Table(Cast()) function on it.
     Following is the simplified form of my procedure.
     PROCEDURE get_target_weights
     p_in_template_target IN target_arr,
     p_out_count          OUT NUMBER,
     IS
     BEGIN
          SELECT count(*) into p_out_count
     FROM TABLE(CAST(p_in_template_target AS                     target_arr)) arr;
     END;
I am calling get_target_weights from my java code and passing p_in_template_target with 10140 records.
Scenario 1: If target_pct in the last record is 0, p_out_count returned from the procedure is 0.
Scenario 2: If target_pct in the last record is any other value(say 0.01), p_out_count returned from the procedure is 10140.
Please help me understand why the Table(Cast()) is not returning the correct results in Scenario 1. Also adding or deleting any record from the test data returns the correct results (i.e. if keep target_pct in the last record as 0 but add or delete any record).
Let me know how can I attach the test data I am using to help you debugging as I don’t see any Attach file button on Post Message screen on the forum.

I am not able to reproduce this problem with a small data set. I can only reproduce with the data having 10140 records.
I am not sure if this is the memory issue as adding a new record also solves the problem.
This should not be the error because of wrong way of filling the records in java as for testing purpose I just saved the records which I am sending from java in a table. I updated the stored procedure as well to read the data from the table and then perform TABLE(CAST()) operation. I am still getting 0 as the output for scenario 1 mentioned in my last mail.
Here is what I have updated:
1.     Created the table target_table
CREATE Table target_table
target_id          NUMBER(10),
target_entity_id NUMBER(10),
dd           CHAR(3),
fd           CHAR(3),
code      NUMBER(10),
target_pct      NUMBER,
template_nm VARCHAR2(50),
p_symbol      VARCHAR2(10),
pm_init          VARCHAR2(3),
target_name     VARCHAR2(20),
target_type     VARCHAR2(30),
target_caption     VARCHAR2(30),
sort_order      NUMBER (4)
2.     Inserted data into the table : The script has around 10140 rows. Pls let me know how can I send it to you
3.     Updated procedure to read data from table and stored into variable of type target_arr. Run Table(cast()) operation on target_arr and get the count
PROCEDURE test_target_weights
IS
     v_target_rec target_table%ROWTYPE;
     CURSOR wt_cursor IS
     Select * from target_table;
     v_count NUMBER := 1;
     v_target_arr cws_target_arr:= target_arr ();
     v_target_arr_rec target_rec;
     v_rec_count NUMBER;
     BEGIN
     OPEN wt_cursor;
     loop
          fetch wt_cursor into v_target_rec; -- fetch data from table into local           record.
          exit when wt_cursor%notfound;
          --move data into target_arr
          v_target_arr_rec :=                     cws_curr_pair_entity_wt_rec(v_target_rec target_id,v_target_rec. target_entity_id,
                    v_target_rec.dd,v_target_rec.fd,v_target_rec.code,v_target_rec.target_pct,
     v_target_rec.template_nm,v_target_rec.p_symbol,v_target_rec.pm_init,v_target_rec.template_name,
     v_target_rec.template_type,v_target_rec.template_caption,v_target_rec.sort_order);
          v_target_arr.extend();
          v_target_arr(v_count) := v_target_arr_rec;
          v_count := v_count + 1;
     end loop;
     close wt_cursor;
     -- run table cast on target_arr
     SELECT count(*) into v_rec_count
     FROM TABLE(CAST(v_target_arr AS target_arr)) arr;
     DBMS_OUTPUT.enable;
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('p_out_count ' || v_rec_count);
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('v_count ' || v_count);
END;
Output is
p_out_count 0
v_count 10140
Expected output
p_out_count 10140
v_count 10140

Date difference is not showing the correct result for date interval

Hi Expert,
                I've created two formula variable one for PO date and another for GR date
while i am taking the date difference of GR and PO date for single PO date selection
it showing me correct result , but while i am taking the date interval for PO date it not
showing the correct result.
eg: PO date: 01.01.2010   for a particular PO and Gr date is suppose 03.01.2010, 06.01.2010
      it showing the result 2 and 5.
But if i am taking date interval for PO date:
eg: 01.01.2010 - 31.01.2010
PO date: 10.01.2010 and GR date are suppose 15.01.2010, 22.01.2010 and 30.01.2010
it showing me 14, 21 and 29
Thanks and Regards
Lalit Kumar

Hi Expert,
                Through replacement path.
Thanks and Regards
Lalit Kumar

Function used in SQL query not showing the desired results

I have created a function that gives me the client id but when i am using the function in the query its not giving me any result i.e. 0 rows but if I execute the function sepreatly and put the result of that function in the qurey it is giving me the desired result please have a look on the following and please reply with you expert opinion:
FUNCTION CODE:
create or replace function j2
(usid in varchar2)
return varchar2
is
cidn_in varchar2(4000) := '';
ls_sep varchar2(1) := ',';
cursor predicate_cidn
is
select
logical_schema_id
from
CLIENT_REGISTRY cr,
MEMBER_ROLE_CLIENT_ASSIGNMENT mrca,
MEMBER m
where
mrca.base_client_id = cr.base_client_id and
mrca.member_id = m.member_id and
cr.schema_in_use_in = '1' and
m.active_status_id = 'A' and
upper(mrca.member_id) = upper(usid);
BEGIN
for GET_CIDN in predicate_cidn
loop
cidn_in := cidn_in || ls_sep || '''' || GET_CIDN.logical_schema_id || '''';
end loop;
cidn_in := substr(cidn_in, 2);
cidn_in := '('||cidn_in||')';
--dbms_output.put_line(cidn_in);
return cidn_in;
END ;
SQL> select j2('qaa@adp') from dual;
J2('QAA@ADP')
('BASE18','SDK1TEST','SEETHA1CONFIG','BASE09','KAREN2','SIVACONFIG','BASE19','SD
K1CTEST','VASU1','KAREN5','EVENTS1CTEST','SDK1','ADA1CONFIG','BASE10','VRB1CONFI
G','CRU2CONFIG','BASE20','SIVATEST','PCOMCONFIG','KP1CONFIG','KAREN4CONFIG','EVE
NTS1TEST','SUZ3CONFIG','DONG2CONFIG','ED2CONFIG','SIVACTEST','APDCONFIG','EVENTS
1CONFIG','ESSCONFIG','SIVA','SDK2CONFIG','ED3CONFIG','RAJ4CONFIG','CBRCONFIG','N
AMRATA2CONFIG','EMIL1','NAMRATA1CONFIG','SDK2CTEST','BVT2CONFIG','MURUGAN1CONFIG
','COB1CONFIG','GABY1TEST','CHR1CONFIG','ED4CONFIG','USE1CONFIG','SDK2TEST','DEM
O1CONFIG','BERNIE1CONFIG','XA1','CAR2TEST','SDK2','ED5CONFIG','PAY1TEST','PAYXCO
NFIG','KP1TEST','SEAN1CONFIG','CAR2CTEST','VASU1CONFIG','SEAN2CONFIG','KP1CTEST'
,'MAU1CONFIG','CONWCONFIG','PAN1CONFIG','MERAJ2','PRA3CONFIG','SEAN5CONFIG','KP1
','PRA4CONFIG','CAR2CONFIG','PRA2CONFIG','SEAN6CONFIG','PRA3TEST','RPT','GABY1CT
EST','SDK3CONFIG','PRA2TEST','SEAN9CONFIG','CAR2','LV1CONFIG','PRA3CTEST','DONG1
CONFIG','TE1CONFIG','MERAJ2CONFIG','VIV1CONFIG','GABY1','SEAN2','PRA2CTEST','PRA
3','RPTCONFIG','PRA4CTEST','SEAN3','MITA1CONFIG','PRA2','RPTCTEST','PCOM1CONFIG'
,'SS2CONFIG','PAY1CONFIG','SEAN7','ANNCONFIG','BASE11','BASE02','LV2CONFIG','RPT
TEST','IMPECONFIG','SUR1CONFIG','SREEK2CONFIG','BASE03','SRINU3CONFIG','BDCONFIG
','JAY1CONFIG','AMMAN1','PRA1TEST','WPGCONFIG','BASE12','MP5CONFIG','MERAJ1','SR
INU2CONFIG','XA1CONFIG','RAJ1CONFIG','WPGCTEST','BASE04','CHRIS','RAJSCONFIG','P
ANKAJ','BASE13','WPGTEST','RAJ3CONFIG','WPG','BASE14','VASU2CONFIG','SRINU1CONFI
G','BASE05','PRA4TEST','VASU1TEST','PRA5CONFIG','NISH1CONFIG','CHRISCONFIG','SDK
3TEST','RAJ3TEST','KP2CONFIG','BASE06','DEFPCONFIG','NISH2CONFIG','CHRISCTEST','
WPSCONFIG','VASU2TEST','BASE15','GABY1CONFIG','PRA5TEST','MITA2CONFIG','BASE07',
'VASU1CTEST','KP2TEST','VASU2CTEST','LAURA3CONFIG','BASE16','CHRISTEST','WPSTEST
','VASU2','KP2CTEST','EVENTS1','BASE17','RAJ2CONFIG','WPSCTEST','BASE08','SREEK1
CONFIG','ADVE','PRA4','SDK1CONFIG','KP2','KAREN1','CRU1CONFIG','WPS')
Now if i put the results (cut and paste )in the query it gives me the results
SQL> select count(*) from baseclient.address_detail where cidn in ('BASE18','SDK1TEST','SEETHA1CONFIG','BASE09','KAREN2','SIVACONFIG','BASE19','SD
2 K1CTEST','VASU1','KAREN5','EVENTS1CTEST','SDK1','ADA1CONFIG','BASE10','VRB1CONFI
3 G','CRU2CONFIG','BASE20','SIVATEST','PCOMCONFIG','KP1CONFIG','KAREN4CONFIG','EVE
4 NTS1TEST','SUZ3CONFIG','DONG2CONFIG','ED2CONFIG','SIVACTEST','APDCONFIG','EVENTS
5 1CONFIG','ESSCONFIG','SIVA','SDK2CONFIG','ED3CONFIG','RAJ4CONFIG','CBRCONFIG','N
6 AMRATA2CONFIG','EMIL1','NAMRATA1CONFIG','SDK2CTEST','BVT2CONFIG','MURUGAN1CONFIG
7 ','COB1CONFIG','GABY1TEST','CHR1CONFIG','ED4CONFIG','USE1CONFIG','SDK2TEST','DEM
O1CONFIG','BERNIE1CONFIG','XA1','CAR2TEST','SDK2','ED5CONFIG','PAY1TEST','PAYXCO
8 9 NFIG','KP1TEST','SEAN1CONFIG','CAR2CTEST','VASU1CONFIG','SEAN2CONFIG','KP1CTEST'
10 ,'MAU1CONFIG','CONWCONFIG','PAN1CONFIG','MERAJ2','PRA3CONFIG','SEAN5CONFIG','KP1
11 ','PRA4CONFIG','CAR2CONFIG','PRA2CONFIG','SEAN6CONFIG','PRA3TEST','RPT','GABY1CT
12 EST','SDK3CONFIG','PRA2TEST','SEAN9CONFIG','CAR2','LV1CONFIG','PRA3CTEST','DONG1
13 CONFIG','TE1CONFIG','MERAJ2CONFIG','VIV1CONFIG','GABY1','SEAN2','PRA2CTEST','PRA
14 3','RPTCONFIG','PRA4CTEST','SEAN3','MITA1CONFIG','PRA2','RPTCTEST','PCOM1CONFIG'
15 ,'SS2CONFIG','PAY1CONFIG','SEAN7','ANNCONFIG','BASE11','BASE02','LV2CONFIG','RPT
16 TEST','IMPECONFIG','SUR1CONFIG','SREEK2CONFIG','BASE03','SRINU3CONFIG','BDCONFIG
17 ','JAY1CONFIG','AMMAN1','PRA1TEST','WPGCONFIG','BASE12','MP5CONFIG','MERAJ1','SR
18 INU2CONFIG','XA1CONFIG','RAJ1CONFIG','WPGCTEST','BASE04','CHRIS','RAJSCONFIG','P
19 ANKAJ','BASE13','WPGTEST','RAJ3CONFIG','WPG','BASE14','VASU2CONFIG','SRINU1CONFI
20 G','BASE05','PRA4TEST','VASU1TEST','PRA5CONFIG','NISH1CONFIG','CHRISCONFIG','SDK
21 3TEST','RAJ3TEST','KP2CONFIG','BASE06','DEFPCONFIG','NISH2CONFIG','CHRISCTEST','
22 WPSCONFIG','VASU2TEST','BASE15','GABY1CONFIG','PRA5TEST','MITA2CONFIG','BASE07',
23 'VASU1CTEST','KP2TEST','VASU2CTEST','LAURA3CONFIG','BASE16','CHRISTEST','WPSTEST
24 ','VASU2','KP2CTEST','EVENTS1','BASE17','RAJ2CONFIG','WPSCTEST','BASE08','SREEK1
25 CONFIG','ADVE','PRA4','SDK1CONFIG','KP2','KAREN1','CRU1CONFIG','WPS');
COUNT(*)
228
BUT if I user the function it gives me no results
0 rows selected and its taking a loon time to reurn

This appears to be a duplicate of the question in this thread
Re: VPD issue Need Assistance ASAP
where I wrote
"Your function returns a single string that happens to have a bunch of commas and quotes in it. An IN list generally requires a list of strings, which your function doesn't return.
You could rewrite the function to be a pipelined table function and then do
select count(*)
from baseclient.address_detail
where cidn in (SELECT cidn
FROM TABLE(<<your pipelined table function>>))
However, I would expect it to be easier not to wrap all this into a function and just have your IN clause be the logic in your predicate_cidn cursor.
Justin
"

Ldapsearch does not return the correct result

We are using the Netscape Directory server 4.12. We try to use the Radiator Radius server to query the Directory server for authentication.
When we use the filter:
uid=itkychan
to query if the user is in the Directory, it returns the correct result.
However, we would like to query if the username is in a specified group, e.g. tss_ns_grp, in the Directory, we try to use the following command:
#./ldapsearch -b "o=The xxx University,c=HK" -h hkpu19
"(&(cn=tss_ns_grp)(|(&(objectclass=groupofuniquenames)(uniquemember=uid=itkychan))(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=itkychan))))"
but no result is returned.
itkychan is a member of the group tss_ns_grp. The following is a portion of the LDIF file:
dn: cn=tss_ns_grp, o=The xxx University, c=HK
objectclass: top
objectclass: groupOfUniqueNames
objectclass: mailGroup
cn: tss_ns_grp
mail: [email protected]
mailhost: abcd.xxxu.edu.hk
uniquemember: cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uid=itkychan, ou=xxxu_ITS, o=The xxx University, c=HK
uniquemember: cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uid=itjcheng, ou=polyu_ITS, o=The xxx University, c=HK
uniquemember: .....

You will have to use the full DN for the member and uniquemember e.g.
(...(uniquemember=cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uid=itkychan, ou=xxxu_ITS, o=The xxx University, c=HK)...)

Query with outer join not dispalying the correct results

Hi All,
I am having a table which has a column called status it can either be null or has the code which comes from the lookup b.When I use this query
select b.menaing from a
where a.status=b'lookup_code(+)
AND b.lookup_type='MTH_BUSINESS_FUNCTION'
AND b.LANGUAGE = USERENV('LANG')
then I don't get the rows from table a, where status is null
and if I use the condition:
select b.menaing from a
where ((a.status IS NULL) OR
(a.status=b.lookup_code
AND b.lookup_type='MTH_BUSINESS_FUNCTION'
AND b.LANGUAGE = USERENV('LANG') ))
then I get many extra rows.Can soemone please tell me hwo to achieve this(My query should display the menaing if status column is blank then it should dispaly blank otherwise after joining iwth the lookup table it should display meaning)

Hi Prazy,
using nvl also didn't solve my problem.Actually my problem is I am having a table a in which I have a column called satus, status has the values like A or I .I have one lookup called MTH_BUYSINESS_FUNCTION in which for lookup_code A I have menaing as Active and for lookup_code I meaning is Inactive.Now in table a for sttaus I have two values one A and one null Now I want to write sql which displayes the meaning for column staus.Result should be Active and null .If I am uisng 1 query which I gave u I am not able to get the 2nd row in my output.If I use 2nd query then I get duplicate rows.
Thanks ,
Amrit

The Same Excel Functions Not Giving the Same Result in Numbers

I'm been using Excel for years and now that I've made the switch to Mac, I thought I should probably utilise the iWork suite of software and get rid of Microsoft once and for all.
Whilst I love the user-friendliness, there are so many small things that Apple to appear to have overlooked which keeps me hanging on to Microsoft Office just a little, but I digress.
OK, So I have one sheet in Numbers with the following data.
I am trying I need to search Column A for the TLDs in Column C, if they exist output the correct renewal price from Column D in Column B
e.g. A2 contains .net so B2 should have 12.50 in it.
A
B
C
D
1
Domain Name
Renewal Price 1
TLDs
Renewal Price 2
2
test.net
.com
5.00
3
test.co.uk
.co.uk
10.00
4
test.com
.net
12.50
So... can someone please explain to me why the same functions which exist in Numbers and Excel (VLOOKUP / LOOKUP / SEARCH) do not work in Numbers as they do in Excel? If there is a valid reason, fine, I'll accept that, but how do I acheive the above?
The formula which WORKS in B2 in Excel but NOT in Numbers is:
=VLOOKUP(LOOKUP(32768,SEARCH(C$2:C$4,A2),C$2:C$4),$C$2:$E$4,2,FALSE)
Thanks in advance.

So... can someone please explain to me why the same functions which exist in Numbers and Excel (VLOOKUP / LOOKUP / SEARCH) do not work in Numbers as they do in Excel? If there is a valid reason, fine, I'll accept that, but how do I acheive the above?
That's a form of "array function" (searching a "table array"). Numbers can't do array functions the way Excel can.
Here's one way to achieve the same goal in Numbers:
The formula in B2, copied down:
=VLOOKUP(RIGHT(A2,LEN(A2)−SEARCH(".",A2)+1),Prices::$A:$B,2,FALSE)
SG

Name attribute not giving the desired result in form tag

Hi,
I am using struts and the name attribute in form tag is not giving me the desired reuslt. The code is
<html:form name="loginActionForm" type="source.form.LoginActionForm" action="/login.do" method="post">
</html:form>
when I am trying to use the name in javascript then I am getting an error
"document.loginActionForm " is null or not an object.Where am I going wrong?

I did so but the name I have used in the form tag is the same as what i have used in javascript.I dont think that it is a javascript error and it must be some mistake I made in the form tag.Also one more thing is it necessary to use the type attribute if you use the name attribute.

HttpServletRequest.getHeaders("accept") does not return the correct results

I noticed that when I use the invoke the HttpServletRequest.getHeaders("accept") method I do not get the result that I am expecting.
For instance, if the browser passes over the following accept header:
"text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,/;q=0.8"
When i invoke the getHeaders() method, instead of it returning me a single value with the string that was passed over, it returns me 4 separate entries. It looks like Iplanet is parsing the header value and breaking it up by commas.
When I run the same code in TomCat, it returns the single comma separated string as I would expect.
Is there anything to keep Iplanet from breaking apart the header value?
I am running Oracle iPlanet Web Server 7.0.15 B04/19/2012 21:52
Thanks In Advance,
Marty
Edited by: MartyJones2 on Aug 30, 2012 2:44 PM

You will have to use the full DN for the member and uniquemember e.g.
(...(uniquemember=cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uid=itkychan, ou=xxxu_ITS, o=The xxx University, c=HK)...)

Why is my zero order hold not giving the expected result?

I am trying to replicate the functionality of the Discrete Order Hold Function so that I can use it without having to have a ''Control and Simulation Loop''. The attachment desiredresult.vi shows an example of the Discrete Order Hold Function inside the ''Control and Simulation Loop''. The other attachment (zeroorderholdquestion.vi) shows my attempt at achieving the same result. I multiplied the while loop index by the sampling period to get the array index for the resampled y-output. I based this on my understanding of the formula for Discrete Order Hold given under http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371894G-01/lvsim/sim_dzoh/#details.
However, I am having difficulty getting the frequency of the waveforms before and after resampling to match up. (See attachment for clarity on what I mean by this). Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong?
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
zeroorderholdquestion.vi ‏207 KB
desiredresult.vi ‏244 KB

here i wrote something maybe similar to simulate a multi channel, mux, sample and hold with cross talk
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/How-can-I-create-and-sample-and-hold-circuit-in-Labview/m-p/2407256#...
If samplerate and hold time have a clean ratio you just need the decimate vi
another simple version:
Greetings from Germany
Henrik
LV since v3.1
“ground” is a convenient fantasy
'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'

Query: Not getting the desired result. Please help

QL> select * from ecev;
entity_Tag
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
SQL> select * from dg;
DIGP_TAG CEPT_TAG
600 1
700 1
800 1
900 1
100 1
200 1
500 1
75 2
SQL> select * from enow;
ENTITY_CODE ENTITY_TAG DIGP_TAG TARGET_DA CEPT_TAG
EXT 7           600      26-MAY-07 1
EXT 8           700      26-MAY-07 1
EXT 9           800      26-MAY-07 1
EXT 10           800      22-APR-76 1
EXT 1           100      20-OCT-06 1
EXT 2           200      20-OCT-06 1
EXT 3           500      20-OCT-06 1
EXT 4           100      20-OCT-06 1
EXT 5           100      20-OCT-06 1
EXT 6           80      20-OCT-06 1
EXT 1           75           2
SQL> select * from tk;
TK_TAG DIGP_TAG NARRATIVE DUE_DATE CEPT_TAG
35 90 raj 27-MAY-07               1
36 900 kkd 27-MAY-07               1
37 100 kim 28-MAY-07               1
30 100 ram 23-MAY-07               1
31 100 kish 23-MAY-07               1
32 200 mar 23-MAY-07               1
33 100 gy 23-MAY-07               1
34 100 mm 27-MAY-07               1
8 rows selected.
For the following query
1 select
2 d.ecev_tag ecev_tag,
3 a.digp_tag entity_owner ,
4 c.digp_tag task_owner,
5 c.tk_tag task_tag,
6 c.narrative
7 from enow a,
8 entl b,
9 tk c,
10 ecev d
11 where ( a.DIGP_TAG=100 or c.digp_tag=100)
12 and a.entity_tag=b.entity_tag(+)
13 and b.tk_tag=c.tk_tag(+)
14* and a.entity_tag=d.entity_tag
SQL> select * from entl;
TK_TAG ENTITY_TAG
35 5
36 10
30 1
31 1
32 2
33 3
34 3
Result:
I get
entity_tag ENTITY_OWNER TASK_OWNER TASK_TAG NARRATIVE
5 100 90 35 raj          row1
1 100 100 30 ram          row2
1 75 100 30 ram          row3 1 100 100 31 kish          row4
1 75 100 31 kish          row5 3 500 100 33 gy          row6
3 500 100 34 mm          row7
4 100                              row8
Row1: yes, since entity_tag 5 is owned by digp_tag 100 (enow)
Row2: yes, since entity_tag 1 is owned by digp_tag 100 (enow)
Row3: NO, since entity_tag 1 is owned by digp_tag 75, which in turn is in cept_tag 2, since the passed digp_tag is 100 and it just belongs to cept_tag 1 we should not be getting this row.
Row4: Yes, since tk_tag 31 is owned by digp_tag 100 (tk)
Row5 NO, since entity_tag 1 is owned by digp_tag 75, which in turn is in cept_tag 2 since the passed digp_tag is 100 and it just belongs to cept_tag 1 we should not be getting this row.
Row6: Yes, since tk_tag 33 is owned by digp_tag 100 (enow)
Row7: Yes, since tk_tag 34 is owned by digp_tag 100(enow)
Row8: Yes, since entity_tag 4 is owned by 100(enow
I guess i have to join dg.cept_tag and a.cept_tag, but it is not working.....
Can somebody understand this and help...
Thanks
Ram

QL> select * from ecev;
entity_Tag
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
SQL> select * from dg;
DIGP_TAG CEPT_TAG
600 1
700 1
800 1
900 1
100 1
200 1
500 1
75 2
SQL> select * from enow;
ENTITY_CODE ENTITY_TAG DIGP_TAG
TARGET_DA CEPT_TAG
EXT 7
          600      26-MAY-07 1
8           700
     26-MAY-07 1
EXT 9
          800      26-MAY-07 1
10           800
     22-APR-76 1
EXT 1
          100      20-OCT-06 1
2           200
     20-OCT-06 1
EXT 3
          500      20-OCT-06 1
4           100
     20-OCT-06 1
EXT 5
          100      20-OCT-06 1
6           80
     20-OCT-06 1
EXT 1
          75           2
L> select * from tk;
TK_TAG DIGP_TAG NARRATIVE DUE_DATE
CEPT_TAG
35 90 raj 27-MAY-07               1
36 900 kkd 27-MAY-07               1
37 100 kim 28-MAY-07               1
30 100 ram 23-MAY-07               1
31 100 kish 23-MAY-07               1
32 200 mar 23-MAY-07               1
33 100 gy 23-MAY-07               1
34 100 mm 27-MAY-07               1
8 rows selected.
For the following query
1 select
2 d.ecev_tag ecev_tag,
3 a.digp_tag entity_owner ,
4 c.digp_tag task_owner,
5 c.tk_tag task_tag,
6 c.narrative
7 from enow a,
8 entl b,
9 tk c,
10 ecev d
11 where ( a.DIGP_TAG=100 or c.digp_tag=100)
12 and a.entity_tag=b.entity_tag(+)
13 and b.tk_tag=c.tk_tag(+)
14* and a.entity_tag=d.entity_tag
SQL> select * from entl;
TK_TAG ENTITY_TAG
35 5
36 10
30 1
31 1
32 2
33 3
34 3
sult:
I get
entity_tag ENTITY_OWNER TASK_OWNER TASK_TAG
NARRATIVE
5 100 90
35 raj          row1
100 100 30
ram          row2
75 100
30 ram          row31 100 100
31 kish          row4
75 100
31 kish          row5
3 500 100
33 gy          row6
500 100 34
mm          row7
100                              row8
1: yes, since entity_tag 5 is owned by digp_tag 100
(enow)
Row2: yes, since entity_tag 1 is owned by digp_tag
100 (enow)
Row3: NO, since entity_tag 1 is owned by digp_tag 75,
which in turn is in cept_tag 2, since the passed
digp_tag is 100 and it just belongs to cept_tag 1 we
should not be getting this row.
Row4: Yes, since tk_tag 31 is owned by digp_tag 100
(tk)
Row5 NO, since entity_tag 1 is owned by digp_tag 75,
which in turn is in cept_tag 2 since the passed
digp_tag is 100 and it just belongs to cept_tag 1 we
should not be getting this row.
Row6: Yes, since tk_tag 33 is owned by digp_tag 100
(enow)
Row7: Yes, since tk_tag 34 is owned by digp_tag
100(enow)
Row8: Yes, since entity_tag 4 is owned by 100(enow
I guess i have to join dg.cept_tag and a.cept_tag,
but it is not working.....
Can somebody understand this and help...
Thanks
Ram
Result:
I get
entity_tag ENTITY_OWNER TASK_OWNER TASK_TAG NARRATIVE
5 100 90 35 raj     row1
1 100 100 30 ram     row2
1 75 100 30 ram     row3
1 100 100 31 kish     row4
1 75 100 31 kish     row5
3 500 100 33 gy     row6
3 500 100 34 mm     row7
4 100                    row8

Logical column not diplaying the correct results

Hi,
I am trying to display the %iBOTS failed and in my situation all have failed so i should get a value of 100%, but i am getting a value of 1 always even if i change the *100 to *600 menas it is not multiplying, below i is the formula used:
CASE WHEN "iBOTs Reporting".""."XXX_SCH_OWNER"."FACT_NQ_INSTANCE"."STATUS" = 2 THEN "iBOTs Reporting".""."XXX_SCH_OWNER"."FACT_NQ_INSTANCE"."INSTANCE_ID" END / "iBOTs Reporting".""."XXX_SCH_OWNER"."FACT_NQ_INSTANCE"."INSTANCE_ID" * 100
Any idea where i am going wrong.
Rgds
Raja

Hi,
It did not help, i believe as the aggregation method is count is not able to do the multiplication, i i remove the count it is doing the multiplication with the actual instance number, why is it not able to do a divide and multiply if count is applied, what is thw workaround.
Rgds,
Raja

NOT IN operator giving the wrong results

DB version:10gR2
Why is NOT IN giving the wrong results. Isn't NOT EXISTS operator a flawless alternative to NOT IN?
create table my_table1 (col1 number);
insert into my_table1 values (1);
insert into my_table1 values (2);
commit;
create table my_table2 ( col1 number);
insert into my_table2 values (1);
commit;
select * from my_Table1;
       COL1
          1
          2
select * from my_table2;
       COL2
          1
--correct result
SELECT * FROM my_table1 t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS
(SELECT * FROM my_table2 t2 WHERE t1.col1 = t2.col1)
       COL1
          2
---correct result using IN
SELECT * FROM my_table1 t1 where col1 not in (select col1 FROM my_table2 t2);
       COL1
          2
Inserting a NULL to my_Table2
Now the query using NOT IN is returning wrong results.
insert into my_table2 values (null);
commit;
SELECT * FROM my_table1 t1 where col1 not in (select col1 FROM my_table2 t2);
no rows selected
Query using NOT EXISTS is still giving the right results.
SELECT * FROM my_table1 t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS
   (SELECT * FROM my_table2 t2 WHERE t1.col1 = t2.col1);
       COL1
          2

ScottsTiger wrote:
can i use NOT EXISTS(with a proper Co-related subquery) as a safe alternative to NOT IN?Depends on your data and what you need to achieve.
Personally I avoid using NOT EXISTS or NOT IN if I can really help it.
My preferred method is to outer join the tables together and then remove any resultant rows where a value exists and I didn't want one. ;)

Query does not retrieves the correct values

Hi,
pls look into the code.
clear: wf_etenr,
         vbep.
To get the Scheduled Loading date and Scheduled Arrival Date.
    SELECT MAX( etenr ) FROM vbep INTO wf_etenr
                        WHERE vbeln = tvbdpl-vgbel
                        AND   posnr = wl_posnr.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      clear vbep.
      SELECT SINGLE * FROM vbep         "R02
             WHERE vbeln = tvbdpl-vgbel "R02
              AND posnr = tvbdpl-vgpos "R02
              AND etenr = wf_etenr.
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
when i see the values at dictionary level using the same wher conditions are mismatching with the query excution result in the program.
here in the second query ( SELECT SINGLE * ) it giving the wrong results .
if i compare the results at table level ,some of the field values are missing after excuting the above second query.
pls can any one give me ur suggestion on this !
rgds
sanjay reddy

Hi,
are these the same?
wl_posnr and tvbdpl-vgpos
try
SELECT SINGLE * FROM vbep
WHERE vbeln = tvbdpl-vgbel
AND posnr = wl_posnr
AND etenr = wf_etenr.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
to make somewhat consistent querys.
regards
Message was edited by: Zlatko
        Zlatko Stracenski

Query not giving the correct result

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for