Reconciliation Ledger AND Co Code Validation

Hi there,
We are on SAP ECC6.0 with New GL and Doc Splitting Activated.
1. I want to know whether Reconciliation Ledger is still needed to be activated. I feel not, because New GL with Doc Splitting should take care to ensure that FI and CO are always in Sync.
2. I also want to know whether Co Code Validation must be activated at Controlling Area so that the CO Objects of one Co Code do not get accidentally posted on another.
The main concern is that once it is set or activated (and the docs posted) we cannot Revert it back by Unchecking.
As per current Business needs, there is no need to have such postings where in the Books of Co Code A the Internal Order of B Co Code is used.
Please Help
Thanks
Bob

Hi,
If you are on ECC6 and the necessary configuration for realtime integration between CO and FI has been configured, then you do not need the Reconcilliation Ledger and you can disable it in the controlling area.
If your organisation has multiple company codes and it is possible that there can be transactions between these company codes that have CO implications then I would recommend that you leave the "Co Code Validation" unchecked. For example if you enable it, you cannot raise a PO in CoCd A against a cost assignment object in CoCd B. My recommendation is to leave it unchecked until you have clear requirements.
Regards,
Kenneth

Similar Messages

Business place and section code validation error

while posting in f-58 clearing special g.l bill of exchange system is giving me an error that bussiness palce and section code is mandatory.

Hi
There is a validation rule which has been created for Account Type K or based on posting Keys. You can see the same in Transaction Code GGB0
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Business Place and Section Code - Validation

Dear All,
While posting a document through Tr Codes FB60/F-43/MIRO, Business Place and Section Code should be Mandatory fields, the system should not move forward to other screen untill and unless, entire this fields.
Provide me the Validation steps with Screen Shots in GGB0 and OB28.
please give me some solution as to :
1. How to make mandatory OR
2. How can i assign a default value, so that End Users do not miss it out any time
Thanks
Anil

Hi Anil,
Hi:
Go to GGB0...
In prerequisites
BKPF-TCODE 'FB01' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '1000' AND BSEG-KOART = 'K'
please note in t code you can write any-other t code you are using for posting.
Check
BSEG-BUPLA = 'XXX' AND BSEG-SECCO = 'YYY'
Message
Error message to be assigned with type E
Assign validation created in OB28
Thanks
Muthu

FI- Reconciliation ledger

Hi,
I would like to know what is meant by Reconciliation Ledger and How we can create Reconciliation Ledger in the SAP - Retail

Hi Ravi,
You can use reconciliation postings to transfer cross-company code; cross-business area or cross-functional area postings made in CO that are relevant to FI, and to automatically create reconciliation postings there. You can make these reconciliation ledger postings at any time
In the information system, you can compare the account balances between CO and FI for a particular period using reconciliation reports. In these reports, the system displays a difference for a reconciliation posting made outside of the period. The cost flow overview report is more suitable for checking reconciliation between CO and FI. To ensure that all reconciliation postings are transferred, you should only execute reconciliation at period-end, after closing all CO postings. If you execute reconciliation more than once, the SAP R/3 System only updates difference values since the last reconciliation run.
You can give me your personal Id, I can send you the documentation on step by step to be done in Reconciliation ledger.
Regards
Sridhar

Validation of business place and section code in fb60? (India)

Hi gurus!
I am facing the following problem:
My India Customer wants me to create a validation to make business place and section code mandatory in fb60. I have read on many threads about this. Business place and section codes lies in the header in fb60 but when looking at tables they belong to segment level.
I have created the validation but could not find business place (BUPLA) and section code (SECCO) on document header so I had to put the validation on line item level. The problem is that when I register an invoice in fb60 the validation creates an error message on line item level (where I have not filled in section code and business place) and not on document header level (where I actually have filled in the parametres). Therefore I cannot post the document now even though I have filled in everything. So how do I solve this?
Many thanks in advance!
Br Åsa

Hi,
If i understand correctly, you need only validate the vendor line item. The FB60 "Document Header" is actually the document header PLUS the vendor line item.
In Your prerequisite add BSEG-KOART = 'K'
This way only Vendor line items will get checked.
Kind regards

Register User and code validation Images

Hello,
I am programming regiester user page and i nedd to add a image with show a code validation aleatorie, but i dont know how to do this.
Please help me.

Hi
I don't know where the information for that field is from
Validation 1.
IF T.CODE ; VA01 or VA02 and User id isXXXXX ( REAL group),then check ZZSO_SORT = REAL (hard code value)
Validation 2.
IF T.CODE ; VA01 or VA02 and User id isXXXXX ( VIRTUAL group),then check ZZSO_SORT = VIRTUAL (hard code value)
The field VBAK-ZZSO_SORT can be filled programatically by the user-exit USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK (include MV45AFZZ):
FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK.
IF T180-AKTYP = 'H' OR                                    "---->VA01
     T180-AKTYP = 'V'.                                      "---->VA02
    IF SY-UNAME = <......>.
      VBAK-ZZSO_SORT = 'REAL'.
    ENDIF.
    IF SY-UNAME = <......>.
      VBAK-ZZSO_SORT = 'VIRTUAL'.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    "USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK
Otherwise it needs to know who/what inserts the value of VBAK-ZZSO_SORT in order to decide where the control has to be placed.
Max

Validation Check for business place and section code.

Hi Gurus
Please provide me the prequisite check for creating a validation check for business place and section code.
Regards,
Vikas Malhotra

Hii..
Goto T.Code Ob28 write the following validation.
Prerequisite
BKPF-BUKRS = 'XXXX' AND BSEG-KOART = 'K' AND
BSEG-QSSKZ = 'XX' AND BSEG-BSCHL <> '35' AND
BSEG-BSCHL <> '25'
Check
BSEG-BUPLA = 'XXXX' AND BSEG-SECCO = 'XXXX'
Message
Message number ZFI 002
Regards,
Aakash

LEDGER and cin

What is meant by subledger account and pending ledger?
what is condition type , where we use in ?

Definition of General Ledger and Sub Ledgers in SAP
u2022 The general ledger is a list of account balances for a specific company. It is used to support legal financial statements and other statutory reports.
u2022 All accounting transactions to a company are recorded in the General Ledger; then, if applicable, P&L transactions are posted through to Controlling module.
u2022 Where it is not practical to list all accounts of a specific category in the GL, e.g., customers, they are totalled and rolled up into one account (reconciliation account). The list of customer accounts (AR) is a sub ledger of the general ledger. Other sub ledgers are vendors (AP), fixed assets, material stock balances, work orders and capital projects.
u2022 Transactions posted to sub ledgers are automatically rolled up into the General Ledger reconciliation
accounts
u2022 Transactions posted to sub ledgers are automatically rolled up into the General Ledger reconciliation
accounts
Sub Ledgeru2014Accounts Payable , Accounts Receiveable & Asset Accounting
General Ledger- A/P Reconcilation Accountinmg , A/R Reconciliation accounring, Asset reconciliation accounting
Condition Types
Price elements are represented in the SAP system byg condition types. Price elements can be, for example, prices, surcharges, discounts, taxes or, freight, and are stored in the system in condition records.
We can, for example, define whether a discount is calculated as a percentage or a fixed amount using the condition type.
We specify an access sequence in every condition type. Thus, we define which fields the SAP system checks when searching for a valid condition record.
u2022     The pricing procedure groups all condition types together which the SAP system is to automatically take into account during pricing for a business transaction
u2022     Remember that we can only specify manually in a document those condition types which are contained in the pricing procedure.
u2022     We can change the outcome of pricing in the sales document manually. We can limit options for changing a condition type in this IMG step.
u2022     If we define wer own condition types, the key should start with the letter Z since SAP reserves these letters for that purpose in the standard system.
u2022     Do not change the condition types which are contained in the standard SAP R/3 System.
Actions
1. Check to what extent we can use the condition types contained in the standard SAP R/3 System.
2. Create new condition types by copying a similar conditions type and changing it according to wer requirements. One reason for creating a new condition type is we may require a calculation rule for a discount which is not avaialable in the standard system.
Specify an alphanumeric key which can have up to 4 digits, and a textual description.

FI & Co Reconciliation ledger issues

Hi,
Could you pl explain me Reconciliation between FI Books & Co books . what are the Configure setting required along with path . where we will see the Reconciliation ledger .
Regards
SAPCO

RECONCILIATION LEDGER EXAMPLE 1
When you need to drill back from the FI G/L to find which cost center was
Posted to on an expense account, the reconciliation ledger is accessed.
The need to have a CO to FI reconciliation process is a result of cross company
Code, cross-business area, or cross functional area activity that may occur in
the CO module. Order settlement or confirmation, cost center assessment, or
other internal CO movement may initiate these postings. When costs moved
internally within CO, the FI G/L is not updated because of CO use of secondary
Cost elements to facilitate the postings.
The first two steps in reconciliation ledger configuration are to activate the
Ledger within the controlling area and assign a document type. If you have an
Existing controlling area that does not have the reconciliation ledger activated,
Activate the reconciliation ledger.
Controlling  Overhead Cost Controlling  Cost and Revenue Element
Accounting  Reconciliation Ledger  Activate Reconciliation Ledger (KALA)
RECONCILIATION LEDGER EXAMPLE 2
A good receipt posting of Rs.100 has occurred on internal order 1, which is
Assigned to company code 1. One hundred percent of the value of internal order No.1 is settled to internal order 2, which is assigned to company code 2. A Settlement Cost element is used for the settlement posting. When an order
Settlement is run, internal order 1 is credited with Rs.100 and internal order 2
Is debited with Rs.100. The balances of internal order 1 and internal order 2
Are 0 and Rs.100, respectively. However, the balances of company code 1
And 2 remain as they were prior to settlement. The reason: settlement activity
Was internal to CO. No FI update occurred.
To place the FI company codes back in balance, the CO-FI reconciliation posting transaction should be run. The resulting FI postings would credit
Company code 1 for Rs.100 and debit company code 2 for Rs.100. The internal
CO activity will now have been accounted for in FI and company codes are now in balance.
Regards,
Ravi

Reconciliation Ledger

Hi All,
What is the T-code for Reconciliation ledger. What is the use of it and how to run the reports in it?
Thanks

Hi,
The T.Code for Reconciliation Ledger is KALC in 4.7v.
Refer to sap best pratices
help.sap.com/bp_iasifrsv1470/BBlibrary/Documentation/I63_BPP_EN_DE.doc
Please let me know if you need more information.
Assign points if useful.
Regards
Sridhar M

When I run the Reconciliation ledger KALC in the doc not update cost centre

Hi
I have done assessment and distribution in month ending. This distribution did in 2 company codes cost centers. it was successfully posted & updated in 2nd company code cost center.
Then I ran the Reconciliation ledger in KALC month end. I was also successfully document posted in G/L account.
But Cost centre was not updated or not picking in the document.
Please give me suggestion .
Thanks
Indu

Dear Indu,
KALC will not update specific CO objects. The intention of the reconcilliation ledger is to reconcile CO internal postings with Financial Accounting. The necessity for reconciliation arises from the fact that, depending on controlling area / company code relationship and customizing, any CO posting can either be:
u2022     Cross company code
u2022     Cross business area
u2022     Cross functional area
or a combination of the above mentioned. For these CO internal postings there will be no corresponding FI documents with the result that CO and FI do not reconcile on company code/business area or functional area level. The reconciliation ledger adjusts this by creating the relevant FI documents. I hope this clarifies the issue.
Regards
Karl

Trnsaction Code OASV and Transaction Code OAMK

Hi friends,
I have a doubt.
Transaction Code OASV is for loading the GL balances for Assets. (giving effect in GL Books)
Transaction Code OAMK is for setting and Resetting the reconciliation account.
Question:
1) Whether do I need to reset the Reconcilaition account in transaction Code OAMK, before posting in transaction code OASV?
2) If I Credit the Accumulated Depreciation & Debit the Initial Upload in transaction Code OASV, whether this accumulated depreciation will cause probllem, when system posts the depreciation through transaction Code AFAB?
Please can you educate me, Thank you in Advance
Thank You & Kindest Regrads
Srikaanth

Dear Srikaanth,
1) No, you don't have to do it. OASV will allow you to post to FA reconciliation accounts.
2) No. it won't. This is the way to reconcile the FI-AA sub-ledger and FI-GL. After OASV check the asset history sheet as of the takeover date.
Regards,
Milen.

Currency reconciliation ledger

Hi there,
i am running a COPA assessment cycle from a GBP company code into a EUR company code.
We have reconciliation ledger active between these two company codes. When executing the reconciliation ledger posting, the GBP amount on the sender side is converted into Euro. On the receiver side the amount of course is posted in Euro. The latter conversion into Euro i can understand as it is based on the M rate we use in the CO area.
However the conversion from GBP into Euro on the sender side happens with a totally wrong rate (not M) and i cant figure out where SAP pulls this from. Is the rate taken for cross company code cycles or for reconciliation ledger postings something to customize and if so, where?
Thanks
Kai

Kai
What is the controlling area currency? And what do you mean by
"When executing the reconciliation ledger posting, the GBP amount on the sender side is converted into Euro. On the receiver side the amount of course is posted in Euro. The latter conversion into Euro i can understand as it is based on the M rate we use in the CO area."
On sending side, GBP will be TC (transaction currency) and LC (local currency).
On receving side, GBP will be TC and EUR will be LC.
So conversion from GBP to EUR in receiving compnay will take place at ex rate specified in configuration of (plan) version 0.
Not sure if this replies. if not, send more details with the accounting entries etc so i can check

Difference between AP PO Reconciliation Report and GL

I have followed the following - R12 Accrual Balance Mismatch Between Accrual Reconciliation Report and GL - Troubleshooting (Doc ID 1107953.1)
My SLA and GL Balances match as per the doc.
However I have a difference of around 3 million in the AP PO Reconciliation Report and the General ledger.
Any ideas to find the cause of the difference is welcomed.
Thanks

Are you still investigating this issue?
If yes, please submit the Accrual load run program with to-date as of the period-end of reconciliation with GL.
Then, reconcile again.
Regards

Cross company code validation in CO Area

Dear All Experts,
I am having one query regarding cross company code validation in CO area. I have ticked Cross company code validation in controlling area, and it is working perfect.
we have total 11 company codes. 10 for US & 1 for Canada. Say 1001 to 1010 US company codes & Canda it is 1101.
The requirement is :-
Now client wants to post cross company code transaction within these 10 US company codes and it should not throw an error ( Ideally which is giving right now ). It should give error only when posting to US company code transaction and Canada Cost Center or Internal Order.
Can we restrict the company code for cross posting validation ? OR Can selected company codes set for validation indicator ?
Experts guidance will be great on this.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Dear,
Murali.
Thanks for your reply.
As you said :- Validation check applies for all the company codes which are assigned to your controlling area.
Means simply we can not apply this option to selective company codes, Right ?
Once it is ticked it is applicable to all company codes.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Reconciliation Ledger AND Co Code Validation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for