Sales BOM Split Valuation Routine

Hi,
I do have Sales BOM, I do have split valuation in place. How to Standard cost a Material which has only Sales BOM and do not have a routine etc. In procurement alternative, what are the necessary entries I have to make, if this is to be costed.?
Kindly clarify.
Ashok

Hi
IMG > Controlling > Prod Cost Contr > Cost Obj Contr > Prod cost by sales order > Control of sales order related > Req Classes & req Type
In Req class - You have fields like Costing ID, Costing method, etc which would determine whether SO cost estimate is to be run or not
Also, you have field VALUATION in req class - which specifies whether to valuate the inventory based on SO cost estimate or not
The Link is Account Assignment Category assigned to Req class; req Class to Req Type AND
Req Type is either assigned to SD item category OR to PP MRP Group / Strategy group
Hope this helps
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Component in BOM with Split Valuation

Hi all,
Can anyone tell me how to assign component in BOM for which split valuation is activated.
Example:
Material ABC has two source 1) Domestic and 2) Import
Now for production material ABC is used in following ratio:
Domestic 10 kg
Imported 5 kg
Now as stock of material having valuation split will be handled individually i.e. domestic stock and imported stock, how it is to be differentiated in BOM?
Thanks and regards

Hi,
What kind of differentiation you are looking for?
If the stocks (of Domestic and Imported Product) are maintained at different storage locations, you can give two line items (with same material code) in the BOM.
Now in the item details for components, you can specify the respective storage locations. Then while GI the system would pick accordingly.
Hope that helps.
regards,
Rohit.

Split valuation SAP Retail POS Aggregated sales

Hello,
Using IDoc WPUUMS01, I'm trying to upload aggregated sales into my SAP Retail system.
We are using split valuation for Retail (normal stock and promotional stock).
The error that keeps coming on is: Enter valuation type (100000017)
being (100000017) the material number
The same error happens when I put the action (promotion) number or not in the IDoc.
The logistic team has already made a goods receipt for both normal stock (RNORMAL) and promotional stock (RAKTION), for the same plant wich I'm testing with.
I've read from help.sap that if the action code (promotion code) it's entered in the IDoc, SAP should recognize that and when posting the material document it should take the goods from the promotional stock (RAKTION) and if not (enter the action code) then SAP would take the goods from the normal stock.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/085012470311d1894a0000e8323352/content.htm]
Is this process automatic? should we do something else? Please let me know if there's any further customizing we should consider
Kind regards,
F.Chavez

Hi ,
Just want to understand from you that Ru posting the goods movement from the WPUUMS or ru processing the Goodsmovement separately from WPUWBW?
Base rule for split valuation is when ever a goods movement happens,system will demand Valuation type ((normal stock (RNORMAL) and promotional stock (RAKTION)) whatever may be the type of movements.
it is like Goods movements against Article/Site/Storage location/Valuation type.
Incase of receipts we can control this at item level(delivery tab).
Incase of issues(Sales-GM251) system will check for the valuation type.
Please check the inbound idocs are having the content of valuation type .ISR should get aggregated details based on Valuation type.
Regards,
Ramakrishna Nuthalapati

Split valuation type pick up in MRP run according to BOM

Dear experts,
We are starting to use split valuation scenario. Initially we have customize split valuation as standard i.e.
1) Creation of valuation type
2) Creation of valuation category
3) Assignment of cat. and type.
4) Local definition.
5) Assignment of valuation category in material.
6) Extend material with valuation type.
What i have customized and tested is working fine. Recently our user have a requirement that, valuation type field should be available in BOM for their clear understanding. Accordingly we have enhance the BOM screen and added valuation type to be choose by user during BOM creation. exit used PCSD0002.
Now here is issue.-
I have parent X and its child Y with valuation type SKF, BOSCH and NRB. I have fixed/specify valuation type BOSCH in BOM. If we run MRP for the parent, system should have to create purchase requisition for child with only specified valuation type in BOM i.e. with BOSCH in this case.
Note - We cant use default proc. valuation type in customization as customer requirement is frequently changes also user specified that, system must have to select valuation type specified in BOM and create proposals accordingly both for PIR and dependent requirement.
Please suggest.
With best regards,
Manish K. Bachate

Hi
You would be very much able to valuate both the stocks separately with what I have recommended
But, with what you are doing, you wont be able to... Reason being, once you release std cost for the externally procured item, say, 5 USD... It will keep on valuating the item at 5 USD only.. Any price other than 5 invoiced by the vendor would hit the Price diff account OR you will have to revise your std cost every time the vendor changes his price
Ideal way would be to keep price control V in the valuation type "External Proc"... With this, you dont need to release std cost for it and also it would valuate the stock at whatever price supplied by the vendor.. Whether 5 or 6 USD
> To summarize, what I am recommending is this
> 1. Your material in this case will have 3 accounting view... [One parent view and One view for IN HOUSE and one for "External Proc"
> 2. Parent view will have Price control V, IN HOUSE will have S and External Proc has V
> 3. In IMG settings for split valuation, earmark IN HOUSE for internal proc and External Proc for purchase
With this
1. Your IN HOUSE stock will be valuated at std cost released by CK24
2. Your External Proc stock will be valuated at the price supplied by the vendor
Hope this helps!!
Regards
Ajay M

3rd Part Dropship Scenario with Sales BOM

Hi
We have a 3rd Party Dropshipment scenario with Sales BOM with susequent Debit
Characteristics of Sales BOM
Sales BOM is created
Header Material is Valuated but non-inventorised (Accounting and costing view should exist)
Component Material is Valuated and inventorised
In Sales order, Pricing is done at the header material not at the components level
During Billing we get the COGS for the header material (cost coming from VPRS)
No VPRS exist at component level instead we have copy of VPRS just to capture the value in COPA for our reporting
Process
1. Sales Order created with Sales BOM exploded in sales order.
2. At the Item level Purchase requisition is created.
3. PR for the components is converted to PO
4. Vendor Delivers the components to Customer.
5. Statistical GR done in our system.
6. Invoicing is done in MIRO
7. We directly do the Billing. Billing is created at header level. Revenue and COGS is reported at Header level only.
We are stuck when we are doing the Subsequent Debit (can be for any unplanned cost). For Susequent Debit we are not able to report differential COPA at header level.
Normally whenever you do subsequent debit in case of 3rd party dropship for normal material, COPA document automatically attached to Billing. This is happening because of the behaviour of VPRS condition type. In our case VPRS only exists at header level and not at component level but replenishment is for components. Subsequent debit is also happening at component level. We need it to be reported at header level.
We need some solution to this.
Please advise
Regards
Neeraj
Edited by: NEERAJ BHARDWAJ on Dec 2, 2011 5:12 AM

Hi Raj,
Please clarified your requirement here, you mention that you wanted to valuated COGS at actual cost of PO? That sound more like actual costing here and what is the reason for this requirement?
Is this MTO with variant configuration?
If this is MTO with VC, Yes - we do cost Sales Order and here is the brief steps:-
Price Control S
a) Sales Order Creation - Normally when you save this will be costed and marked automatically. Note that condition type EK02 will represent the cost here
b) Run MRP based on Sales Order requirement which resulting planned orders, PR, etc
c) Convert PR-PO, Planned Order -> Production Order
d) Confirmations, GR on PO which valuated according to the SCE Costing in step a)
e) PGI will be based on the GR value on step d) which is also your SCE Costing
f) Any variance between PO and SCE need to be settle.
Thanks,
Ong Yang Lim

Problem with Sales BOM

Hello All,
The problem is related to Sales BOM where in the Item Category Group we maintain ERLA and the free item gets populated with the main item in the sales order with a different item category and the pricing is shown as statistical.
Now I want the system to show any error message or stop the next proceeding whenever the stock of the free item alongwith the main item or viceversa is not available or if there is any partial availability in case of free item & main item or viceversa.
Please suggest how to configure this or if any routine or user-exit need to be maintained for this.
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka Mitra

hi
check the Sale order User Exit and code your logic and make use of it

Sales BOM - Delivery Quantity check during post goods issue

I am working on a problem in my company. We are running ECC6.0 ehp 4. We are using standard ERLA functionality with sales bom (5) for product kits. Delivery manager has requested that we investigate a system check during delivery post goods issue. THe problem is that when shipper processes delivery, if they have to backorder they update pick and delivery quanity on the TAE item. They should also update TAQ delivery quantity, so that backorder amount is correct. If they make data entry error, backorder quantity is incorrect. The delivery manager has tried a number of attempts to re-train and correct mistakes. He is now asking that SAP issue a hard error if TAQ and TAE delivery item quantities are not the same.
I have searched on SAP Notes, Forms, and Google and do not see solution. I know that at delviery item category there is a minimum qty check for the item category. I've not found a user exit or configuration point that checks quanities. Does anyone know of out of the box solution? Or where would I put in custom user exit?
Test Case
Create Standard Order
Enter Material with Sales BOM
ITEM A     Qty 10
BOM explodes with Item categories
ITEM A     TAQ parent
ITEM B     TAE child
Create Delivery
Delivery has item categories TAQ and TAE
TAE is pickable, TAQ no pick
Process TAE
     Pick quantity of 5 items
     Change delivery quantity to 5 items
     Forget to change TAQ delivery quantity
     Pack 5 items
Post Goods Issue the delivery.
Is there are requirement/routine than can be run at time of PGI that checks TAQ delivery quantity is the same as TAE delivery quantity. If quanities are not the same, show hard error and message do not allow PGI to complete.
Thank you
Tony Romain

I tried setting that field in the sale order this morning. By defaulting it to "C"; I was able to get warning message for TAE line. I was able to post goods with TAE and TAQ, being different quantities. I need the check to determine if TAE and TAQ delivery quantity are different. Using this fields seems to be line specific. Thanks for the suggestion. I now know what that field does to the delivery.
I rewarded points.
Thanks,
Tony

Canu00B4t use two step transfer with split valuation ?

Hi people , i´ve activated split valuation for MaterialX , it has two Valuation types ( Production and Purchase ) . The problem arose when i tried to do a two step transfer between plants ( mov 303 ) and i got the following error msg :
Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation
Message no. M7048
Diagnosis
In the receiving plant, the material is subject to split valuation. For this material, a stock transfer cannot be carried out using the two-step procedure.
Procedure
Use the one-step procedure (movement type 301) or a stock transfer order for the stock transfer.
The message is very clear itself , but... i just wonder if there`s actually any way to avoid this, considering that having to create a transfer order for each movement will duplicate work and using a one step transfer won´t be practical. I tried to change the error msg into a warning but couldn´t find it in customizing. Thanks for any comments on this !

First of all , thanks everyone for the help.
Csaba Szommer, Kunal ingale , i read the OSS note and the pdf and indeed everything confirms it´s not possible to do the two step movement. So , i tried the stock transport order and something else appeared here. When creating this type of order , the system first ask for a Supplying Plant , then you can populate the material , quantity and the destination plant. But then it asks for the Valuation Type of the material involved, and it seems this field is Mandatory . Is it possible to make this field on the transport order as optional ? I couldn´t find this field at SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Define Screen Layout at Document Level .
I need this field to be optional for the following reason. In my company there´s a relation between two plants , Plant A ( from where products are dispatched to the customer ) and Plant B ( where the material is produced with valuation type "Production" and sometimes is buyed from vendors with valuation type "Purchase" ) . The idea is to run an MRP which will generate the material needs on Plant A considering the Sales Orders. This need will be then transformed (automatically by MRP ) in Stock Transport Orders with Supplying Plant "Plant B" and receiving "Plant A". The problem here is that , at the moment of the transport order creation it´s no possible to know which will be the valuation type of the material that will satisfy the need. I mean , Plant B ( production and buying plant ) will check the list of needs for Plant A and then will decide which material ( with which Valuation Type ) they will provide considering the actual stock levels at the time of the MRP run.
In a few words, i see the only way to do a two step transfer of a split valuated material is using Stock Transport Orders , is there a way to make the field "Valuation Type" optional ?. The idea would be to choose the Valuation Type of the material at the moment of the Good Issue. Thanks a lot , once again.
Edited by: Christian Len on Jul 7, 2008 3:16 PM

Reconfigure sales BOM deletes line item and creates new line item

We are having issue with Sales BOM. Once sales BOM is reconfigure, line item is automatically deleted and creates new line item. These changes are not captured by reporting tool. Is it standard SAP behavior? if its not standard behavior, how to fix this issue?

Hi,
If i am not wrong, i assume you are using site instead of plant. If it is plant , then "yes", we can have a order with same material being line item 10 and 20 with different plants. Reg delivery, if the plants are configured to a same shipping point then you will have one delievery. if the plants are configured for a different shipping point , then delivery will be split up.
Reward if it helps,
Thanks & regards,
CLN

How to estimate two products price in split Valuation

hello, everyone,
Our factory have Two equipments , one is a new equipment A , the other is an old equipment B,
they all produce the prodcut W , but the old equipment B consume electricity ,warm water and Raw material is much more than the new equipment A. So the cost price of product W is different when they were produced by equipment B and equipment A.
the Finacial Department and Sales Department want to know different cost price of product W via different equipments in the end of every month. Now we use two different material NO to deal with it(actually it is one product ) ,but this method take a lot trouble to stock, because one product quantities were seperated by different material NO in Storage location.
According to this requirement, we activate the split valation, but the customizing of split valuation just supply one field for val.type in-house prod, at the same time , the t-code CK11N screen has not the field vauation type. if we don't estimate the material cost price by CK11N, when we create sales billing ,the system can not post COPA document and give a error that is :“Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "1180119998"
   may you have a good method to deal with this type of business or you ever met this kind of business . may you share it , I appreciate you for your help !!!
    Davis
    Best&Regard.

Hi
You can change the same through MR21
regards
Sanil

Sales BOM explosion in STO sch agreement

Dear Friends,
I have a requirement where sales BOM is to be exploded in STO sch agreement.
I would like to know whether it can be done in STO sch agreement.
I tried to achieve this by making the following config.
Material master for Header part : Item category ERLA
The STO PO order type is : UB.
STO delivery TYPE           : NL.
Item category                   :NLN
Changes made in NLN
Structure scope set to - A
Application     as SD01
In order to delivery copy control : Routine 301.
With all these settings in place i am not able to explode the BOM.Kindly let me know if anything else is to be done in addition to this.
Thanks.

hi
Structure scope set to - A
Application as SD01
where you have maintained, for which document type you have maintained
let us know for further
Regards
vardhan

Process order based on split valuation

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where the same HALB material in the plant can be of 3 different grades.
Accordingly, if I do a split valuation based on the 3 grades, how can I ensure that while creating a process order on the HALB, depending on the grade (and hence the valuation type) the system picks up the recipe from an available collection of 3 different recipes (for the 3 types)?
Regards
Sm.

Hi
Just go to CT04 and creat three characterstics with grade 1,2 & 3 or as u wish. You can give single value to identify the grade say 1,2,3
go to CL02 and creat class using material class as class type .
Assign these three characteristics to this class
go to mm01 and type the halb and extend the classifcation view
specify the class that is created.
go to bom and in the HALB line item delete it. and create new line item using k as item category and save the bom
now when you creat configuration profile using cu40 and make sure you can use it in production
after this try creating a production order the system will prompt for characteristics use your grade and proceed for production
Krishna

Raw materials on MAP with split valuation used in standard cost estimate

We have a few raw materials which are purchased from different vendors and of different brands. We have opened split valuations for these raw materials. These raw materials are later used in manufacture of different finished goods. We use MAP for raw materials and Std. for finished goods. What configuration and processing steps will be required to run standards cost estimate and what will be standard price for a finished good considering the following example:
Material X is finished good
Raw Material A with split valuation @ USD 5 (brand aplha) & USD 10 (brand beta)
Raw Material B without split valuation @ USD 1
It is expected that we used brand aplha 60% of the time and brand beta 40% of the time and production batch size is usually 100 Kg.
Please reply
Edited by: Chris SAP on Sep 29, 2011 7:56 AM

hi chris
Hope you have configured the material A for split valuation. while calculating standard cost estimate for the material C. through ck11n, the system will pick up the header price from material master.
But here you are saying that you have chances of using the material A, 60% of brand alpha and 40% brand beta
Instead of using split valuation use mixed costing concept. create the material A with separate Ids and create two boms one with alpha and the other with beta.
create procurement alternative in CK91N and mixed ratio with Ck94 and release the mixed cost estimate
please go through this thread also
Re: Difference between Split Valuation and Mixed Costing
Krishna

Material Split Valuation : Procurement Domestic & Import

Dear CO Experts,
I m in a situation where my client has a Raw Material (RM), which is procured domestic & also imported. This RM is attached to a single FG in a BoM.
Do differentiate domestic & import procurement, they have used Split Valuation.
The reason behind such a decision is, since that RM is very sensitive and delay could not be affordable.
Clients are now requesting to have a seperate view of Standard Cost Estimate based on Slipt Valuation. We have observed that execution of Standard Cost Estimate picks only RM which is based on local currency.
Please help me to understand & few steps of missing config, how to have a dual view (based on Slipt Valuation) of Standard Cost Estimate.
Regards,
Hussein.

Hi Hussein
Two RMs are required - But its not a good option... It creates lot of probs in MRP if you have duplicate codes...
Two FGs are not required if you go for 2 RMs....
a. You can create 2 BOMs... The RM will be different in each BOM
b. Routing may be the same
c. Create 2 Prod versions i.e. BOM 1 + Routing = PV1 and BOM2 + Routing = PV2
d. Create 2 Proc Alternatives in CK91N using the Prod 2 Versions
e. Create a Mix ratio in CK94 i.e. weighing factor that you can assign to each PV
f. Calculate cost from CK11N... Costs will be calculated separately for each PV and at the end system would apply the mix ratio specified in CK94
Eg: Cost of PV1 = 100 and Cost of PV2 = 120... If mix ratio is 50:50 - Then Std cost would be 110 (100 * 0.5 + 120 * 0.5)
From my experience - I would advise you to drop your requirement and educate your client about the same... have one single raw material (you can use Split Valuatoin) and use the Average price for Std cost... While execution - The cost of consumption would be charged as per Domestic or Import... This would hence, reflect the price variance....
br, Ajay M

Split valuation for material with two different price indicator S and V

Hello Gurus,
Is it possible to maintain split valuation for same material with two different price indicator S and V.
For Ex. Material A is manufactured can be manufactured in house , procured from outside vendor and can be purchased from subcontracting vendor by providing raw material.
We want to keep Price control V for same material " A" which is procured from outside vendor.
And price control S for inhouse produced same material " A".
Besically this material is semifinished and having BOM for subcontracting.
Please advice.

Hi
When the material is split valuated, you maintain the accounting view for the material 1st with valuation category, here the price control should be V.
When you will extend the material to valuation type "Inhouse mfgd" maintain the price control as S, for valuation type "Procured form outside vendor" maintain it as V.
Regards
Prasad

Sales BOM Split Valuation Routine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for