Slow file access

I have a class that just does some trace logging and it is extremely slow
          when used with a servlet, but is very fast when used otherwise. The class
          is basically just the following:
          Date date = new Date();
          SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat ("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss");
          DataOutputStream dos = new DataOutputStream( new
          ileOutputStream( logFileName, true ) );
          dos.writeBytes( formatter.format(date)+" "+logIdStr+" "+msg+"\r\n" );
          dos.close();
          I added a flag that would skip around all the logic in the write method of
          this class so I could time the servlet without it and found it takes 10
          seconds longer to run the servlet with this logic being run to create a
          couple thousand traces. Any idea why it would be so slow?
          

May be this is because the DataOutputStream class is intended to write
          java primitive types in a binary portable format, so it could make CPU
          intensive checking and conversion ?
          For textual output, it should be better to use PrintWriter.
          Can you check CPU usage ? You can download OptimizeIt! and profile your
          code.
          Note also you open and close a file. How is your disk's fragmentation ?
          Finally it is more efficient to use a StringBuffer to produce the output
          string before passing to a method.
          David Thompson wrote:
          >
          > I have a class that just does some trace logging and it is extremely slow
          > when used with a servlet, but is very fast when used otherwise. The class
          > is basically just the following:
          > Date date = new Date();
          > SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat ("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss");
          > DataOutputStream dos = new DataOutputStream( new
          > ileOutputStream( logFileName, true ) );
          > dos.writeBytes( formatter.format(date)+" "+logIdStr+" "+msg+"\r\n" );
          > dos.close();
          > I added a flag that would skip around all the logic in the write method of
          > this class so I could time the servlet without it and found it takes 10
          > seconds longer to run the servlet with this logic being run to create a
          > couple thousand traces. Any idea why it would be so slow?
          

Similar Messages

  • Very very slow file access iSCSI NSS on SLES11/XEN/OES11

    Hi,
    Like many Novell customers while carrying out a hardware refresh we are moving off traditional Netware 6.5 to OES11 and at the same time virtualising our environment.
    We have new Dell Poweredge 620 serves attached by 10gig iSCSI to Equalogic SAN
    Installed SLES will all patches and updates and XEN and then created OES11 SP2 virtual machines, these connect to NSS volume by iSCSI
    Migrated files from traditional netware server to new hardware and stated testing and ran into very very slow files access times
    A 3.5mb pdf file takes close to 10 minutes to open from local PC with Novell Client installed, same if no client and open via cifs. Opening same file off traditional NW6.5 server takes 3-4 seconds.
    We have had a case open with Novell for almost 2 months but they are unable to resolve.
    To test other options we installed VMWare ESXi on the internal usb flash drive and booted off that, created same OES11 VM and connected to NSS on SAN and same pdf open in seconds.
    The current stack of SLES11/XEN/OES11 is not able to be put into production
    Any ideas where the bottleneck might be? We think is in XEN.
    Thanks

    Originally Posted by idgandrewg
    Waiting for support to tell me what the implications are of this finding and best way to fix
    Hi,
    As also mentioned in the SUSE forums, there is the option of using the Equallogic Hit Kit. One of the tools, next to the great autoconfigure options it has, is the eqltune tool.
    Some of the stuff that I've found important:
    -gro is known read performance killer. Switch if off on the iSCSI interfaces.
    - if possible (meaning you have decent hardware), disable flowcontrol as this generally offers stability but at the cost of performance. If your hardware is decent, this form of traffic control should not be needed.
    -To have multipath work correctly over iSCSI and starting SLES 11 SP1. Make sure kernel routing and arp handling are set correctly (not directly relevant if you only have 1 10 GB link):
    net.ipv4.conf.[iSCSI interfaceX name].arp_ignore = 1
    net.ipv4.conf.[iSCSI interfaceX name].arp_announce = 2
    net.ipv4.conf.[iSCSI interfaceX name].rp_filter = 2
    Test if traffic is actively routed over both iSCSI interfaces:
    ping -I [iSCSI interfaceX name] [iSCSI Group IP EQL]
    -Make sure network buffers etc are adequately set as recommended by Dell (set in /etc/sysctl.conf):
    #NetEyes Increase network buffer sizes for iSCSI
    net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
    net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
    net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 8192 87380 16777216
    net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216
    net.core.wmem_default = 262144
    net.core.rmem_default = 262144
    -Settings for the /etc/iscsi/iscsid.conf I'm using:
    node.startup = automatic # <--- review and set according to environment
    node.session.timeo.replacement_timeout = 60
    node.conn[0].timeo.login_timeout = 15
    node.conn[0].timeo.logout_timeout = 15
    node.conn[0].timeo.noop_out_interval = 5
    node.conn[0].timeo.noop_out_timeout = 5
    node.session.err_timeo.abort_timeout = 15
    node.session.err_timeo.lu_reset_timeout = 20 #Default is 30
    node.session.err_timeo.tgt_reset_timeout=20 #Default is 30
    node.session.initial_login_retry_max = 12 # Default is 4
    node.session.cmds_max = 1024 #< --- Default is 128
    node.session.queue_depth = 128 #< --- Default is 32
    node.session.iscsi.InitialR2T = No
    node.session.iscsi.ImmediateData = Yes
    node.session.iscsi.FirstBurstLength = 262144
    node.session.iscsi.MaxBurstLength = 16776192
    node.conn[0].iscsi.MaxRecvDataSegmentLength = 131072 #A lower value improves latency at the cost of higher IO throughput
    discovery.sendtargets.iscsi.MaxRecvDataSegmentLeng th = 32768
    node.session.iscsi.FastAbort = No # < --- default is Yes
    -Have Jumbo frames configured on the iSCSI interfaces & iSCSI switch.
    If you are using multipathd instead of the dm-switch provided with the Equallogic Hit kit, make sure the /etc/multipath.conf holds the optimal settings for the Equallogic arrays.
    Ever since Xen with SLES 11 SP1 we have been seeing strong performing virtual servers. We still use 1GB connections (two 1GB connections for each server, serving upto 180~190Mb/s).
    There could be a difference with the 10GB setup, where multipath is not really needed or used (depending on the scale of your setup). One important thing is that the iSCSI switches are doing their thing correctly. But seeing you've already found better results tuning network parameters on the Xen host, seems to indicate that's ok.
    Cheers,
    Willem

  • Slow file access - moving toCIFs

    We are using OES11 + latest Novell client
    Some file access is EXTREEMLY slow
    The same Server & Workstations with NO Novell Client installed and CIFs setup is MUCH, MUCH faster
    Does login Scripts work in CIFs mode ?

    Hi,
    What are your NSS settings on your server?
    I found that I needed to set the following:
    Log in as the root user, then open the /etc/opt/novell/ncpserv.conf configuration file in a text editor. Add the following at the bottom of the file:
    OPLOCK_SUPPORT_LEVEL 0
    Ive also added: CROSS_PROTOCOL_LOCKS 1
    The above is not effective immediately - I can't remember what services I had to restart!
    Please let us know how it goes.
    Cheers,

  • Time Capsule (A1409): slow file access problem and how do we create a back up of the files on timecapsule?

    Time Capsule: We have a model no A1049 our network (installed by someone no longer working with us, so I don't know how it was set up or how to access any settings other than via Airport Utility)
    We use it for our central file storage, and as a disk for timemachine backups from the several macs we use here.
    The time capsule is running but we have slow access to files, it takes ages to bring up the list of files available, can I fix this?
    I have just updated the firmware.
    I would also like to know how I can back up these files to another disk.
    I have searched the manuals and also the support community but I can't find the answers or any instructions other than the manuals  and would appreciate help.
    Thank you

    The Time Capsule was designed to handle Time Machine backups from one or more Mac computers, and it will work reasonably well for that purpose.
    But.....and this is a big BUT......it will not work very well at all if you try to make it act as a file server, since the disk spin up time is quite slow among other things like slow read times from the disk.
    Suggest that you get with an IT specialist who can recommend the right file server solution for your network based on your needs.
    As far as backing up the data on the Time Capsule, the simplest way to do this is connect a USB drive to the USB port on the Time Capsule and use the built in Archive function in AirPort Utility to make a complete copy of all of the data on the Time Capsule.
    Unfortunately, the simplest way is also the slowest and the Time Capsule will not be available for Time Machine backups or file serving during the Archive procedure, which will likely take 4-6 hours or so depending on how much data might be on the Time Capsule.  A good time to do this might be late at night, so the Archive copying will run overnight.
    Another better option would be to use a commercially available application, like Carbon Copy Cloner to automatically back up the Time Capsule disk each day at a time that you choose.  The advantage to doing it this way is that CCC will only back up the changes that have occurred since the last back up, so once the first "master" backup is done, the subsequent "incremental" backups will only take a few minutes each day.
    Your IT specialist / consultant will likely have other suggestions for you as well. The advice that we have offered here is meant to be general in nature and not specific to your particular needs.

  • Slow file access-Elements 12:  I store all my photo files (".nef" RAW files) in a RAID 1 external hard drive, which the Elements Organizer links to the reference thumbnails.  Over some time - say, the past year, and especially recently, the time to bring

    One further bit of information:  I did recently run a "disc scan", in case there were file system errors, then ran defragmentation -- on the external drive.  This did not solve the problem.

    I think I'll deal with your different questions in several posts, it'll be easier for me.
    josephunit2n a écrit:
    A few comments:  recently, for the first time, I did a full "backup catalog" routine (with external RAID storage connected) to a second external usb drive, which ran successfully (done, at the time, over longstanding concern that even the RAID 1 storage was not enough data security - as you have mentioned). 
    Good thing, and it's not really a surprise for me, I would have expected no slow down in a process which only reads your RAID drive data.
    One big concern:  in all transactions (backup catalog; move to external storage) I always ignore the "reconnect missing files" dialogue.  This is due to past experience.  Long ago, when I ran it routinely, it was a disaster.  At first, I thought I might reconnect a few randomly missing files.  While this was so long ago I cannot recall all details, everything went to hell.  Even after manually locating a "missing" file,  the "reconnect" never worked.  The number of "missing" files skyrocketed, far out of any realistic number.  Even with Adobe phone support (which is critical for such an application - and must be made available again, I have no problem paying for it), the catalog was hopelessly corrupt, and I manually built a new catalog, file-by-file.  Adobe advice then:  NEVER USE "RECONNECT MISSING FILES", which I have followed religiously (while also trying to be meticulous in my transactions, not to ever create any "missing" files).
    I have never read Adobe advising to never reconnect missing files. Maybe it's not the best course in all circumstances, but I don't see a possible problem there. What is recommended by Adobe is to always reconnect files before doing a backup... Now, my own experience is that if you don't reconnect before a backup you get a restoration where the catalog still points to missing files and where those missing files have not been backed up, totally logical. I would not consider this question as a BIG concern.
    .  Finally, "just for fun", moments ago I connected the RAID storage drive, opened the organizer, and randomly opened a few images in "full screen" view - then opened a scattered group of 4 or 5 images -- and, they all came up promptly!!!!!  So, this "slow access" problem isn't consistent, all the time.  Also, I must comment, your advice to avoid the RAID 1 external usb drive, for future catalog storage, seems "tech superstition", which I will not harshly criticize, as I also have my own technology irrational superstitions.  I believe the computer "sees" this drive no differently than any other external, usb, drive.
    There's a difference between 'technology irrational superstition' and 'reasonable doubt due to ignorance' ... Understanding the problems which may arise when using a RAID drive array supposes understanding of:
    - how the organizer catalog recognizes any drive in its database. That's ok for me, but I have no personal experience of such systems. What I can tell you is that most of the problems I have seen with RAID systems were of that kind.
    - How efficiently the organizer deals with the OS when using a catalog stored on the main drive, with adequate RAM and scratch disk space while the files themselves are on the external RAID drive. Some organizing tasks imply writing to the files themselves. The xmp sidecar files (very small) are stored together with their raw parent. The thumbnails are stored in a database in the catalog folder...
    - How the organizer works with the OS (the APIs) and the particular disk driver. (I am totally ignorant, but I have seen similar problems for other Adobe applications in the feedback forum).
    ... As I said, I have to leave for a moment...
    To be continued!

  • Very slow file-access - Opinions?

    I have configured a VPN using Cisco 857 routers. There are three sites with two of them being ?spoke? sites and one being the ?hub?. The Hub site also accepts VPN client dial-in.
    It all seems to work fine, however I have a question regarding performance more around the available bandwidth than anything. The Hub site is an ADSL router and the upstream connection (which is effectively the other sites downstream connection) is rated at minimum of128kb/s (but I get around 170kb/s of actual file transfer so it?s a fair bit more than that).
    The problem is opening files on a Microsoft server across the link is painfully slow. I did a packet capture and to open a 35KB file the traffic back and forward across the MS ?direct hosting? or AD port 445 ends up being around 215KB for the transaction. Talk about overhead!
    All other stuff seems to be acceptable across the VPN links e.g. domain authentication, email etc, but then that is either relatively small or not real-time unlike opening your MS Word document. Realistically I guess the available bandwidth is insufficient for this purpose being at best about 60 times slower than a 10MB Ethernet.
    What is everybody elses thoughts/experience with this? We can upgrade the plan to a maximum of 512kb/s uplink but I guess the best solution would be a MS terminal server or Citrix server?
    Thanks

    Thanks, I might look at this technology next time. In the end we put a MS terminal server in for users at the satellite sites to connect to and they are very happy with that performance as its just screen, mouse and keyboard traffic going across the WAN.
    BTW if anybodys interested, if you are running SBS2003 you can put in a Windows 2000 server as a terminal server, and you only have to pay for a Windows 2000 server license; user CALS and TS CALS are legally provided by the SBS2003 server (if you use a Windows 2003 server as the TS you have to pay for TS CALS which are really expensive). We did this to keep costs down for our TS solution.
    http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=49921

  • It's very slow to access file server after installed SP1 of Win7.

    I found it's become very slow to access shared files on file server after installed win7 SP1, (windows6.1-KB976932-X86.exe),  access same file, the win7 without sp1 is fast in 5 secs, but the pc with sp1 need more than 30 secs. And
    I tried to removed the sp1, everything goes fine, access fast as others.
    I don't understand what's the reason and which feature affected it, I believe the sp1 can help Win7 be more safety, but why the performance on it get worse.
    And I didn't find the same question or tips on forum or website, do you really haven't the issue?
    Arnold From Shanghai, China
    Arnold Yu

    Hi Arnold,
    Windows 7 Service pack and any other Windows Updates are released to improve the performance, reliability and security of the system.
    Firstly please run the performance troubleshooter:
    Open the Performance troubleshooter
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Open-the-Performance-troubleshooter
    If it doesn't resolve the issue, Put the computer in
    Clean Boot and then check to see if the issue persists.
    If it still persists, please use performance monitor to trace your computer's performance:
    Performance Monitoring Getting Started Guide
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd744567(v=ws.10).aspx
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Windows Users file access SLOW

    XServe 10.4.11
    Connecting to my Home Directory with a XP machine. I can see all my files, but it takes forever to open them.
    Launching AppleWorks 6 on the PC is fine, but opening a document off the server takes over 120 seconds to display. During the time it is 'trying' to open, it seems the PC is locked up.
    This is happening on all our PCs as well. Our Macs have no problems opening the same files.
    The same slow network access is happening when the PCs try to open Word documents stored on the Server as well.
    What settings can I tweak (from the defaults) to allow my PC users to access their documents off the server?
    We were hoping to eliminate the Netware Servers at our High School, but this test we are doing at our Adm Bldg is NOT going very well at all.

    That wasn't it. Documents on PCs still take a LONG time (opening an AppleWorks 6 document for example on a PC took over 1 minute).

  • Slow android file access time

    Hello,
    My app is working very well on ios and I am trying to get it to work right in Android. The problem I am having now is that file access is very slow. Little 30 kilobyte audio files hang the program for a couple of seconds. Is this the current state of android? Looks like the kindle is going back to office depot.

    I am not certain but it looks like my problem is audio file speciffic. I've read that the latency of android audio is poor but in the latest beta there is a low latency sound api. Is there anything I can do to improve the sound latency in android? If so how do I do it?

  • Server 2008r2 and windows 7 pro slow to no networkshare file searching and file access (green progress bar)

    we are running a windows server 2008r2 sp1 domain controller and a 3com gigabit switch to which 7 windows 7 pro computers are connected. We are only using the windows server to distribute a few printers and as a network share (z drive).
    we are storing all files (word documents only) centrally on the server (z share), and files are accessed and written to the z share.
    Problem is that file access from the z share on the windows 7 client computers is at best buggy. we are able to browse the z-share, but as soon as we want to search the z-share for files (f.i. use file explorer with "content: memorandum") the green
    progress bar shows and no search is performed. something like alphabetically sorting a directory on map/file name on the z-share also shows a green bar with no sorting. manually going to the files works.
    One thing i noticed, sometimes not all files that one user created and stored on the server is visible and can be found by another user. I prefer to disable all offline file caching setting, because that feature is not used. no files should be made accessible
    offline. i don't know where to change that on the server side. 
    I am reluctant to experiment on the server end (2008r2 sp1), so i tried a few suggested solutions on the client end (windows 7 client)
    I tried disabling offline file caching
    i tried properties (z share) ==> advanced and map optimizing and several options there
    i tried disabling the smbv2 protocol and disabling the smbv1 protocol (using
    sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb10/nsi command etc. posted by microsoft)
    i tried disabling windows defender
    i tried accessing the z share via ip and server name (the share is mapped via its servername, e.g. dennis-dc1\share). still the same
    file searching on the clients c drive ('own harddrive') works much better, file searching on the server also works.
    any suggestions or solutions that i can test on the client side, as mentioned i am reluctant to change something on the server side. if a solutions works, i prefer to change it on the server side.

    Hi,
    The issue could be due to windows indexing service taking long time in sorting and searching in mapped drives. Please try the steps belwo to disable windows indexing service or search service on the windows 7 client to resolve the issue.
    You can click on Start and select Control Panel, click on
    Programs and Features, go into the Turn Windows Features on or off section Scroll down the list and uncheck the box next to Indexing Service or Windows Search.
    Best Regards,
    Mandy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • Does raid 0 double file access in a MP?

    I am thinking of a MP (Quad 2.66 or 2.94) set up with dual drive striping or, the iMac i7. I know both have the same processor (Xeon has a slight edge) but, will there be a big difference with the striping so I should go the distance and get the MP instead?
    Any one with knowledge if the striping will double (probably 2- 2TB drives in the MP (Hitachi), vs. the 1 - 2TB in the iMac) file access of photo processing an advantage with the MP?
    Thanks....

    All one can say is that in a perfect striped RAID using identical drives the read/write speeds are roughly double for two drives compared to the single drive.
    However, the advantage declines as the RAID array becomes filled. The more files on the array the slower it becomes losing most of its edge over a single drive. Also a striped RAID is vulnerable to drive failure. If one drive fails then all the data on the RAID are lost and unrecoverable.
    In the vast majority of home systems there's little justification for using RAIDs. Striped RAIDs are used mainly in enterprise installations where large amounts of fast server storage is needed and where mirrored RAIDs are used to provide data redundancy and backup.
    RAID Basics
    For basic definitions and discussion of what a RAID is and the different types of RAIDs see RAIDs. Additional discussions plus advantages and disadvantages of RAIDs and different RAID arrays see:
    RAID Tutorial;
    RAID Array and Server: Hardware and Service Comparison>.
    Hardware or Software RAID?
    RAID Hardware Vs RAID Software - What is your best option?
    RAID is a method of combining multiple disk drives into a single entity in order to improve the overall performance and reliability of your system. The different options for combining the disks are referred to as RAID levels. There are several different levels of RAID available depending on the needs of your system. One of the options available to you is whether you should use a Hardware RAID solution or a Software RAID solution.
    RAID Hardware is always a disk controller to which you can cable up the disk drives. RAID Software is a set of kernel modules coupled together with management utilities that implement RAID in Software and require no additional hardware.
    Pros and cons
    Software RAID is more flexible than Hardware RAID. Software RAID is also considerably less expensive. On the other hand, a Software RAID system requires more CPU cycles and power to run well than a comparable Hardware RAID System. Also, because Software RAID operates on a partition by partition basis where a number of individual disk partitions are grouped together as opposed to Hardware RAID systems which generally group together entire disk drives, Software RAID tends be slightly more complicated to run. This is because it has more available configurations and options. An added benefit to the slightly more expensive Hardware RAID solution is that many Hardware RAID systems incorporate features that are specialized for optimizing the performance of your system.
    For more detailed information on the differences between Software RAID and Hardware RAID you may want to read: Hardware RAID vs. Software RAID: Which Implementation is Best for my Application?

  • Extremely slow file copying over airport extreme network

    Hi,
    I have an Airport Extreme Base Station (10/100) network, also connected to the internet. When copying files from my MacBook Pro to a USB drive connected to the base station, OR when copying files to another computer (a windows machine) the throughput maxes out at about 700 KB/sec which is 10 times slower than when copying to the USB drive connected directly to my MacBook Pro. Although I have updated everything to the latest and greatest versions, I still have very slow file copy speeds. It's always been this way. I've read dozens of threads for potential fixes but none of them have helped. I am using Activity Monitor to measure the throughput and also timing the copy of a 10GB file. At these speeds, that file takes 4 hours. Useless.
    My base station is within a few feet. I've tried different channels, 2.4GHz, 5GHz, getting rid of WPA, you name it. At first I thought it might be some issue with the USB drive connected to the base station, but copying to another computer on my network is the same. It is very frustrating.
    Any insights would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks. I thought about buying the TC but I'm worried that if my network is operating slowly, which it appears to be, that I'm not going to get the throughput. I also noticed that my windows machine which is on the same network accesses the internet faster as well. I'm wondering if it is something with my MacBook.
    BTW - I went to school in Pittsburgh. Great great town.

  • Not Working: BlackBerry Link Remote File Access Remove Old BlackBerry from BB ID

    I have: removed my blackberry q10 from blackberry link, wiped my q10, uninstalled and reinstalled blackberry link, have link version 1.1.1.32, blackberry q10 os version 10.1.0.2309 - which whenever I plug in the q10 after removing the device from link, says there is an os update, so I update it, and then it does nothing apart from rebooting the q10, or gives an error saying 'updates not available. Please check internet connection and retry.'.
    Also, I have Logout/login on blackberry link, I know my q10 is activated as I have purchased items from app world, and on the computer the app world site shows that I have a q10 when I sign in. I am using the same BBID and have changed the password on my q10 to see if that made a difference, then signed out and back into link on computer with updated password. I have administrator rights on my computer.
    I can access the q10 from my computer over the same wifi network, and it syncs files fine with wireless sync turned on. It is remote file access not giving the option to connect to my q10. 'BBID *email* isn't associated with a device running Blackberry 10 OS or an error occurred when trying to retrieve your information from the Blackberry ID servers.'
    The problem is that although I have the same blackberry id for link and my q10, no devices show up on the remote file access screen, and I cannot access my files on my computer from my q10, yet I can sync them on my computer over the wifi network. How can I enable Remote File Access?
    A problem could be that I have a Curve 9300 on my BB ID account, so if I could disable this (which I have no idea how to do after a lot of research), this might rectify why link cannot set up remote file access.
    What I haven't done is wiped my q10 and uninstalled all user data from link at the same time, as then I would have to manually reload everything on my q10.
    My q10 shows my computer in the settings\blackberry link\paired devices ,  but I 'cannot view files on *computer*'. Also, link does not show in the file manager. I set up my q10 as a permanent link not a one-off connection.

    No one cares because it's not a z10 (I know because I am having the same problem and no one knows how to fix it and no threads for q10 fix)
    Slàinte.
    Not all things are good.
    Not all things are evil.
    But with an open mind...
    You can see the difference.
    Knowledge is power.

  • Read-only file access from network volume

    I get an read-only file access from network volume problem while sharing a drive from Snow Leopard to a Tiger install. Most of files were opening well, but *.fp7 (FileMaker) and *.xls (Excel) files won't open dealing with a read-only error.
    As descibed in the last post of http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1406977 the client have the same share name of the server. Renomming it resolved the error!
    Thanks!

    right then, as it looks like I'm talking to myself....
    I have just wiped clean the Macbook Pro.
    I installed Leopard from scratch, then installed Office 2008.
    Logged back onto the network share, and the read-only error came up again, ONLY in Excel.
    bugger.
    Did the same thing with my Macbook and all is fine.
    Copy the file to the local hard drive, opens ok.
    I then copied the file to another Mac on the network.
    mmmm, opens fine.
    what's the difference....
    mmmm, the machine it opens fine from is running 10.4
    the machine which hosts all the data is running 10.3.9
    could this be the problem.
    Just done a software update check on the 10.3 machine and there are some security updates that need doing.
    Going to run that now and see what happens, otherwise I think the iMac running 10.3.9 is going to need to come up to 10.4 and fingers crossed this will solve it.

  • Sql agent job getting file access denied error

    I'm not sure if this question belongs in this forum. Please move it if you want to.
    Here is my question. I have an ssis package that is running into an error at the file system task trying to move a file. The package is deployed to the catalog and I am running the package using the stored procedure
    [SSISDB].[catalog].[start_execution] @execution_id
    When I execute this stored proc in Management Studio while logged in under a sysadmin, everything works fine. But when I call the same TQL in SQL Agent job, I get a file access denied error. This has something to do with the id that is getting used
    to run the package and I am not sure how to track that down. Any help would be appreciated.
    I've check the windows permission on both the id that is running the SQL Agent and SQL SSIS Service. Both seem to have the right windows permission.

    Please see:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918760

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes 10.6 crashes when i open books

    Hi, just downloaded itunes 10.6 and as with ALL others it keeps on crashing, in my case only when i open books. I can't sync to my ipad or iphone. Any news on a fix or do i have to revert to 10.5 or something thanx

  • Sol 2.6 (Intel) install won't recognize more than 8GB of my hard drive

    <also posted under the 'Intel platform' topic> I am trying furiously to install Sol 2.6 on a Dell PC that has a 40GB hard drive. I DOS Fdisk to create one huge partition, which fdisk makes active. When I get to "customize fdisk Partitions for disk" i

  • Return PO scenario.

    Hello Experts, Currently we are using the Return PO facility for sending the Materials back to vendor. But all these material are stockable materials. I wanted to know whether it is possible to use return PO for the consumables which are taken in the

  • Anyone know where  I can get a replacement 3GS replacement back case from please?

    Anyone know where  I can get a replacement 3GS replacement back case from please?  Mine has started to crack, preferably White.  Cheers

  • RequestDispatcher.include() silently ignores non-existent files?

              Hello there,           I have a servlet that calls RequestDispatcher.include() to include another jsp.           <pre>           RequestDispatcher dispatcher = myServlet           .getServletConfig().getServletContext()           .getReques