Value not match in KEAT report  with FI

Hi All,
I am going through KEAT report, here is saw that the value of one GL Account in FI  value Column does not match with the value  of the same GL in FBL3N.
Is there is any particular reason as other GL account value matches with the value in FBL3N.
Regards,
Shayam

KEAT shows values posted from the SD module only. If the value is not the same as the account total, then possibly someone has posted to that account directly from FI (TC FB50 or similar). You should be able to find such manually posted documents in FBL3N by looking at fields like "reference" "document type" and such.

Similar Messages

  • FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

    Dear Experts,
    MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
    FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
    The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
    Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
    How & where to analysis?
    Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
    Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
    I really appreciate if any one help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k

    Hello,
    I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
    First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
    Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
    How can you catch this document?
    Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
    Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
    Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
    Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
    I hope it helps to you,
    Regards,
    Burak

  • MM vs FI report - Stock Values not matching

    Dear Experts,
    MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year. 
    FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes  FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values. 
    The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the  client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
    Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
                           How & where to analysis?
    Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
    Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
    I really appreciate if any one help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k
    Edited by: navahsek on Aug 27, 2009 12:17 PM

    Tthe stock values are matching in the company code level for previous financial year but when checking for few sties, the stock values are not matching.
    For Ex. year 2008 MM Stock values Rs. 10 Lakhs & FI values also same Rs.10 Lakhs for the company code level.
                 If you check the same for few sites( Site1, site2, site3, site4) & same year, the MM & FI values are different.
    I really appreciate if you help in this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k

  • Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
    I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
    Could you suggest on this issue.
    Thank you for your cooperation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

  • Aging report and Control account value not matching

    Hi All
    The value what i am getting from   Vendor liabilities aging and Control account is not matching  for the same dates, all my parameters or selection criteria are same
    Same report if i am taking for the current date it giving correctly,
    If i am trying for a previous day the problem is happening
    How can i solve this issue

    Hi,
    Please check if the transactions are done for different Control Accounts and both the account balances are included in the Aging Report.
    Also, check that ALL the customers/vendor groups are taken.
    Make sure that you are running the backdated aging with the checkbox as mentioned in the Note 800294.
    If still facing problems may be you can provide with more details as to what the control account balances and what is the Aging, difference.
    PS: Check if there is any manual journal entry is created in the control account?
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Monthly Aggregate Values are Not matching between Two Reports

    Hi,
    I have two custom reports (Pivot Table View)
    _1) National Report_ This report renders data for the 10/11 Season (From 04/01/2010 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate as well as 10/11 Season Grand Total. This report shows the correct information. We don't have to do any changes.
    _2) YOYOY Report_
    This report renders data for the 10/11, 09/10, 08/09 Season (From 04/01/2008 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate for each of the three seasons as well as Grand Total for each Season.
    Issue:
    Monthly Aggregate Total for the YOYOY Report is not matching with the National Report Monthly Aggregate Total.
    Technical Background:
    - For 10/11 Season, the expressions used to arrive at the Monthly Aggregate Total is the same.
    - Filter Criteria for (1) Report is specific to 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
    - Filter Criteria for (2) Report is for 08/09, 09/10, 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
    - In Report (1), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
    Column Name: Month
    Expression: MONTHNAME(Activity."Created Date")
    Column Name: Sort on Created Month
    Expression: CASE MONTH(Activity."Created Date") WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
    Column Name: 10/11 Season
    Expression: /* Metric column name: # of high risk infants identified since last visit */ CASE WHEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 END
    Aggregation Rule: Sum
    - In Report (2), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
    Column Name: Month Column
    Expression: Date."Calendar Month"
    Column Name: Sort on Created Month
    Expression: CASE Date."Calendar Month" WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
    Column Name: 10/11 Season
    Expression: CASE WHEN Activity."Created Date" BETWEEN /* First Day of Current Season */ timestampadd(sql_tsi_day, -dayofmonth(current_date)+1, timestampadd(sql_tsi_month, -(month(current_date) - 4), Current_DATE)) AND Current_DATE THEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 ELSE 0 END
    Aggregation Rule: Sum
    Key Information:
    - For 10/11 Season, Activity."Created Date" attribute is used for all the calculations based on date.
    - For 08/09 and 09/10 Season, Date.Date attribute is used for all the calculations based on date. This is because the data was migrated from Asset Record Type to Activity Record Type for these seasons.
    I have tried variety of options and nothing seems to get the Monthly Aggregate matching. Kindly suggest what changes do we require.
    Regards,
    Muddessar Nadeem Alanji
    +91-98456 13180

    Hi,
          Are you saying that you loaded the same excel document to both planning area and cube but the data in both is not matching??
    How did you load the excel data to planning area?
    Can you give more details on what data is not matching? Is the cube value smaller than the value you see in planning book?
    Secondly if you are looking at data, make sure your selections are right. In cube, you have to specify the characteristics and at the bottom of the screen you specify the number of records to be displayed. Increase that to some big number like 9999 so that you can see all the records.

  • Service Level Report values not matching to Service Level Dashboard v 2.0 values

    Hi Experts,
    We have installed SLD v2 on a development SQL server along with WSS 3.0. The SLD is pointed to the SCOM datawarehouseDB to collect the information to have it up in the dials.
    We have SCOM 2007 R2 who's OpsMgrDB and OpsMgrDWDB are hosted on a SQL 2008 R2 instance.
    I have created the Distributed application and added 3 Service level Tracking to it. 
    Availibility
    Processor Utilization
    Memory Utilization
    The problem here i am facing is that the values in the dials on the SLD Home sites do not match with the values i get when i run the report for  Service Level Tracking Summary under reporting tab in Ops
    Console.
    What could be probable reason for this ?
    Regards,
    Prajul

    Hello,
    Here are some articles related to this issue. Hope they are helpful.
    Running a Service Level Tracking Report
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212726.aspx
    Generating a Service Level Tracking Report
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441422.aspx
    The Service Level Tracking Summary Report in System Center Operations Manager 2007 may be empty if TODAY is not selected for the TO date
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567404/en-us
    Best regards,
    Sophia Sun
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Utilization values not matching with g/l accounts

    Hi Mentors
    while I am doing the utilization (J2IUN) FOR the month april my utilization balances not matching with g/l accounts. till the march my balances is tallying.
    why i am not tallying in april. please suggest me.
    thanks in advance
    Laxman

    During utilization, the GL balances are read and shown. Hence there should not be any discrepancy. However, please check the GL transactions for the month of April to find out if any non excise posting (a financial JV, for example) has been entered.
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • Totals not matching in the Report

    Hi All,
    I have created two calculated key figures A and B. Out of these A involves multiplication and division and B contain Addition and subtraction operations. When I execute the query, the totals in the Result rows are not matching with the exact total in the rows. Please help me out if any one of you comes across similar issue.
    Example:
    Values (BW Total) Values (Exact Totals)
    1 10 10
    2 10 10
    3 10 10
    4 10 10
    5 10 10
    Total Row 53 50 
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    There is no many complex formulas in the query. The CKF which is having problem is containing only one division and multiplication.
    We have the same CKF in other systems like BQ and BD, they are fine. When I compare both the properties across the systems all the props are same.
    Thanks.

  • Sales order values not coming in copa report can been seen in ke24

    hi
    i have did sd and billing and actual settlement through va88
    i can able to values in ke24 actual line items.
    but when i cant able to see values in ke30 copa report aganist sales order characteristic
    and aganist record type A values are not flowing in copa report.
    please help me.
    thanks
    kareem

    hi ajay,
    i have again prepare actual line items report from ke94 ,ke91 and executed report ,
    here for that particular sales order values are flowing through record type C but not flowing for record type A.
    sales order is not displaying for record type A.
    and for that c only revenue and  and  raw material cost is flowing.
    thanks
    kareem

  • L.C value not appearing in MB51 report

    Dear gurus,
    The l.c value not appearing in MB51 t.code,are there any other reports to see this values if so,plz explain in detail

    Dear Jay,
    It will be available in MB51, may be check your variant for hidden fields or your authorization, You will get in MR51 also
    In Standard SAP System Asset GR will not have any Finance document at the time of Goods Receipt, So you are not getting Amount in LC, If you want to trigger finance document at the time of GR, you have to change the account assignment category A properties like i.e., remove the tick of GR Non valuated  in the below path
    SPRO-->Materials Management-->Purchasing-->Account Assignment-->Maintain Account Assignment Categories, Select A
    Goods receipt made after this change will be triggered the finance document.
    R,
    amala

  • PO & Invoice Value Not Matching during  Intercompany STO

    Dear MM Gurus,
    Need your input for the below issue.
    The MRP(Max Retail Price) in PO is being picked from the supplier region and in Invoice
    the MRP(Max Retail Price) is picked from the customer region. Due to this the values from
    PO to Invoice do not match.
    In actual, the PO ZMRP (Max Retail Price)and ZMAR(Margin Price) needs to be picked from the customer
    region instead from the supplier region.
    Whether the above condition is possible?
    If yes pl suggest a solution

    hi,
    Seems you have defined you own conditions ZMRP and ZMAR in pricing schema.
    Check the access sequence for the condition type, which could give the idea on how to maintain.
    harish

  • Sorting not working in a report with hyperlinks

    I have a report with hyperlinks for one column and I noticed that sorting is no longer working on that report. If I use another version of the same report witout hyperlinks; sorting does work fine.
    I was wondering if anyone has encountered this issue before and what would be the solution.
    Thanks!

    I didn't remove the sorts and was trying to sort again on another column.
    So this is resolved.
    Now another issue; when viewing this report in Interactive mode; the column with hyperlinks doesn't have the sort option when I right click on that column. The sort option does show up but it's grayed out (disabled). When I go to Edit mode; it does allow me to sort on that column.
    Anyone has noticed this?

  • Values are not matching for inventory report

    Hi all,
    we are running the report stock over view, in that there is a key figure total stock which is having the non cumulative option
    inflow and outflow
    data has been loaded correctly but when we are executing the report it is giving the values cumulatively
    that means
    report containing material, plant and calmonth
    we have the data loading from october onwords
    suppose total stock is
    10.2007= 10ST
    11.2007=20ST
    12.2007= 50 ST
    it is giving the output
    10.2007 = 10ST
    11.2007 = 30ST
    12.2007 = 80ST
    it is cumulating the values
    TOTAL STOCK is the business content object which is having the options
    aggregation = sum
    exception aggregation = Last Value.
    can any one helps me on this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suresh.

    HI,
    Thanks for your reply,
    we are not done any compression on the requests, but now deltas are running
    is this is the problem cause for the report
    if it is the problem hw we can resove it
    can you please reply
    Thanks & Regards
    Suresh

  • Update not working on Simple Report with Parameter

    I am trying to get a simple test of the web elements to work for me. I am using the XTreme db in a .Net BOXI R1 system.
    I created a report, WebElements_Test, that selects data from customers. I created a parameter called Country and when run the reports selects data by Country code.
    I created in the report header A a formula Called SelectCountry using the WESelect function:
    WESelect ("Country", "|USA|Italy", "|USA|Italy", {?Country}, """""")
    Next to this I placed a WESubmitButton with this code:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    stringvar path:= WETargetPath ("rpt", "Name", "WebElements_Test", "");
    WESubmitButton ("Update", path, "");
    I then placed a WEBuilder function below these 2 in Report header B:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    stringvar allElements:= {@SelectCountry} + {@Update Button};
    WEBuilder(allelements, 2);
    I published this to BOXI and I ran it and then viewed it without errors, but when I change the select list and press the Update button it will re-post and no filter of the data is done for the selected value and the select list returns to the default value and not to the value I just selected.
    What am I doing wrong?
    Thank You

    if you are getting an issue like this and saved data is unchecked in the designer then there is most likely an issue in your boe environment...as it appears that the final url is being generated properly.
    copy the url into a browser window with the machine name
    (e.g. http://machinename/businessobjects/enterprise11/Infoview/scripts/opendocument.aspx?sType=rpt&sDocName=WebElements_Test&lSCountry=USA)
    see if the report opens...if the report opens and the returned data is incorrect then you'll have to check boe for cache settings.
    also do a search on the report name to ensure that there are no duplicates in the system...if you're using name resolution to an object versus ID or CUID then you will have issues with duplicates.

Maybe you are looking for