Verification of recvr file channel configuration without sending a message

Hi,
We need to test the configuration((such as directory, filename etc.,) of a receiver file channel. As we all know, in the case of sender channel, since it will keep polling the directory configured, if there is any incorrect directory, it will be indicated in the run time work bench, EVEN IF THE MESSAGE HAS NOt GONE THROUGH THE SENDER FILE CHANNEL. However in the case of receiver file channels, UNLESS THE MESSAGE GOES THROUGH THE RECEIVER FILE CHANNEL, we won't be able to identify the incorrect directory configuration.
Thus, please let me know as to how to identify the incorrect directory configuration in the case of RECEIVER FILE CHANNELS, without sending any message through the same.
I appreciate your early response.
Regards
Venkat

Hi,
AFAIK you can check whether the channel is Started/ Stopped (in RWB), check whether correct parameters are filled in the CC (by visual inspection)....but unless and until you test the scenario you may not know whether the CC is properly working or not....somethimes there is a case that you are asked to pay for each and every message that is sent using XI...is this your case?....if not then you can go ahead and test it end-to-end as Dharamveer said.....
If you get the solution (as you need) then dont forget to share with us
Regards,
Abhishek.

Similar Messages

I have three iPads and one iPod and one iPhone. How can I message between them without sending the message to all of them. You send the message to your email address but all of them are set up und one account.

I have three iPads and one iPod and one iPhone. How can I message between them without sending the message to all of them. You send the message to your email address but all of them are set up under one account.

You can have a different receiving email in the Messages app on each device : Settings > Messages > Receive At . I'm not sure that there is a different way to have the message only go to one device.

EDI X12 File Channel Configuration

Hello B2B Gurus,
I am trying to configure the following scenario on a single host to simulate trading partner communication using EDI X12 4010 850/810 over File Channels:
Inbound - 850 PO From RemoteTradingPartner to HostTradingPartner
I have configured a file delivery channel on the partner configuration screen under the "channels" tab. The channel is named: "RTP_File_Receive_Channel".
The channel has the following values set:
Polling Interval: 5
Folder Name: /home/oracle/b2b/remote/b2b_receive
Filename Format: %FROM_PARTY%_%DOCTYPE_NAME%_%DOCTYPE_REVISION%*.dat
Directory Name Format:
Minimum Age:
Archival Directory: /home/oracle/b2b/remote/archived_b2b_receive
I am dropping a file named RemoteTradingPartner_X12_4010_850.dat into the /home/oracle/b2b/remote/b2b_receive folder but for whatever reason, it is not picking it up and sending it to my SOA composite.
Should I be configuring a listening channel in the Administration tab instead of a delivery channel on the trading partner agreement? The naming convention and direction of channels is a topic that confuses me no matter how many times I go through this.

Hello Johnny,
When Oracle B2B receives a transaction either from internal application (outbound) or from a trading partner (inbound), it first identifies the trading partner and then the transaction set. This combination is then used to identify the agreement.
What segment/element values within the .dat payload are introspected to lookup the appropriate trading partner agreement? If I specify those values in the filename format, does it override what is inside of the payload? In general, how do filename format, directory name format, and payload contents work together to resolve to the correct TP Agreement? What is the order of precedence when these values are specified in all three locations.The method for identifying the trading partner and transaction varies among transport, exchange and document protocols. If file name format is specified in the channel then Directory name format is ignored. If file name format/directory name format does not give info about transaction set (doc type and doc type revision) then payload is used to identify the document and it's version. It depends upon the type of document standard used that which selection criteria should be used. Generally for xml payloads x-path is used to identify a document and for non-xml payloads either start and end position are evaluated or the position of a particular element/string.
In short if you give all info for identifying an agreement (From tp, Doc type, doc type revision) in file name format/directory name format, then payload will not be checked for identifying any of these.
Regards,
Anuj

Weblogic 8.1 SP 6 throws Read channel closed when sending SOAP message

Hi,
I am using Weblogic8.1 SP6 & Axis1 to send SOAP message through RPC call using SSL. This is working intermittently.
I use WLSSLAdapter to set up the SSL, and some properties I set:
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory", "weblogic.webservice.core.soap.MessageFactoryImpl");
System.setProperty("javax.xml.rpc.ServiceFactory", "weblogic.webservice.core.rpc.ServiceFactoryImpl");
System.setProperty("weblogic.webservice.verbose", "true");
In case of error, the server throws this:
java.io.IOException: Read channel closed
at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readRecord(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readUntilHandshakeComplete(Unknown Sourc
e)
at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.completeHandshake(Unknown S
ource)
at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.read(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.read(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.read(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.closeWriteHandler(Unknown S
ource)
at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.close(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readRecord(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readUntilHandshakeComplete(Unknown Sourc
e)
at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.completeHandshake(Unknown S
ource)
at com.certicom.tls.record.WriteHandler.write(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.io.OutputSSLIOStreamWrapper.write(Unknown Source)
at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:66)
at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.write(BufferedOutputStream.java:105)
AT java.io.FilterOutputStream.write(FilterOutputStream.java:80)
at weblogic.webservice.binding.soap.HttpClientBinding.writeToStream(HttpClientB
inding.java:430)
at weblogic.webservice.binding.soap.HttpClientBinding.send(HttpClientBinding.ja
va:219)
at weblogic.webservice.core.handler.ClientHandler.handleRequest(ClientHandler.j
ava:37)
at weblogic.webservice.core.HandlerChainImpl.handleRequest(HandlerChainImpl.jav
a:143)
at weblogic.webservice.core.ClientDispatcher.send(ClientDispatcher.java:231)
at weblogic.webservice.core.ClientDispatcher.dispatch(ClientDispatcher.java:143
at weblogic.webservice.core.DefaultOperation.invoke(DefaultOperation.java:471)
at weblogic.webservice.core.DefaultOperation.invoke(DefaultOperation.java:457)
at weblogic.webservice.core.rpc.CallImpl.invoke(CallImpl.java:566)
at weblogic.webservice.core.rpc.CallImpl.invoke(CallImpl.java:419)
Before sending message, application will first retrieve WSDL from the target. This is always success.
I need to know how to fix this problem.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
Alvin

Hi,
Even I am facing the same issue could any body help me out to solve this issue.

Problems detecting if the Producer is authenticated without sending a message

Hello friends,
I have a flex-blazeds apllication for which authentication is done based on session level and not at client level (e.g. when user opens another tab is should be allready authenticated). For this I have declared a secured destination in the messaging-config.xml along with custom authentification command and that the authentication should be done at session level and not at a client level (per-client-authentication = false in the xml).
I am using a Producer component on the flex side and I would like to know if there is any kind of event to listen on the Producer component in order to determine if in the browser's session that I am authenticated or not.
What I have tried until now is :
var producer:Producer = new Producer();
producer.destination = "secureBlazeDSDestionation";
producer.addEventListener(MessageFaultEvent.FAULT, messageFaultHandler);
var message:AsyncMessage = new AsyncMessage();
message.body = "msg";
producer.send(message);
and discoverd that in this case I received an event telling me that "Login required before authorization can proceed." which is ok, but I am interested in a solution that does not involve the sending of the message that triggers first a connection to be made.
Another thing that I have tried is using just the "connect()" method of the producer and adding all kind of listeners to the producer but did not received any notification about the fact that I am logged or not allready in that browser's session.
Does anyone have a solution to my problem please? Does anyone know how to detect from the flex side how to determine if in the same session I have already logged in?
Best regards,
Claudino Bur.

Hi,
AFAIK you can check whether the channel is Started/ Stopped (in RWB), check whether correct parameters are filled in the CC (by visual inspection)....but unless and until you test the scenario you may not know whether the CC is properly working or not....somethimes there is a case that you are asked to pay for each and every message that is sent using XI...is this your case?....if not then you can go ahead and test it end-to-end as Dharamveer said.....
If you get the solution (as you need) then dont forget to share with us
Regards,
Abhishek.

Empty document found. Proceed without sending message - FCC error

Hi,
Getting the above error in sender file channel monitoring and cant seee message in moni.
My FCC parameter are
Record set structure: OrderHeader,,Item,
Sequence : ascending
Key field name : keyField
type: string-case insenitive
OrderHeader.fieldSeparator: ,
OrderHeader.fieldNames: SFA_Order_No,Order_Type,Order_Type,Dist_Channel,Division,Sales_District,Ship_To,Document_Date,Discount,IDENTIFIER,Delivery_Date,Sold_to_Party,Sold_to_Party
OrderHeader.keyFieldInStructure: add
OrderHeader.keyFieldValue: OrderHeader
OrderHeader.endSeparator: 'nl'
Item.fieldSeparator: ,
Item.fieldNames: SFA_Order_No,Material_No,Quantity,GIK_Flag
Item.keyFieldInStructure: add
Item.keyFieldValue: Item
Item.endSeparator: 'nl'
i dont have key field in my source strucure, so given Item.keyFieldInStructure: add
my source file is:
1000001,"Z001","RU ÍÎÂÈÊÎÂÀ ÀÍÍÀ","2999901553","20090803",25,0,"20090804",2999901553,""
1000002,"Z001","RU ÍÎÂÈÊÎÂÀ ÀÍÍÀ","2999901549","20090803",25,0,"20090804",2999901549,""
1000001,"80806730",1,1
1000001,"81200005",2,0
1000002,"90101446",1,1
1000002,"90194294",1,0
source DT strucute is:
can you please validate my FCC parameters?
Regards,
Rashmi

Hi Rashmi,
Remove all this:
Key field name : keyField
OrderHeader.keyFieldInStructure: add
OrderHeader.keyFieldValue: OrderHeader
Item.keyFieldInStructure: add
Item.keyFieldValue: Item
and put this:
Key field name : SFA_Order_No
and test it.
Regards,
---Satish

How to send a message to WD from a BPM?

Hi All,
I have a ccBPM in which I recieve a binary file .
On receiving it I want :
1)To send it to a folder in my pc.
2)After sending file I need to send a message to WD giving path of file on my system so that it can be UPLOADED to the context.
Please help !
Points assured for helpful answers!
Sumit

HI,
See the below links
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit - File to RFC - File to Mail
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/22/xi-maintain-rfc-destinations-centrally - Maintain RFC destination centrally
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/configuring-the-sender-rfc-adapter--step-by-step
Troubleshooting - RFC and SOAP scenarios-/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2008/01/08/troubleshooting--rfc-and-soap-scenarios-updated-on-20042009
XI: RFC or ABAP Proxy ? ....ABAP Proxies with attachments --/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/04/19/xi-rfc-or-abap-proxy-abap-proxies-with-attachments
RFC -> XI -> WebService - A Complete Walkthrough (Part 2) -/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/28/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-2
RFC to SOAP
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/23/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-1
/people/piers.harding/blog/2004/07/18/you-dont-need-to-use-soap-to-keep-your-rpc-clean
/people/david.halitsky/blog/2006/08/25/soa-vs-rfc-it-doesnt-have-to-be-charles-bronson-vs-henry-fonda
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?query=rfc%20to%20soap%20scenario&cat=sdn_weblog
Regards
Chilla
reward points if it is helpful..

How to send JMS Message from a BPM Process

Hi All
I have small query regarding sending JMS Message from a bpm process. Is it possible to send JMS message from one bpm process to another bpm process.
I have a scenario in which I need to send a JMS message to a queue where another process is listening on that queue and as soon as the message is received on the queue the process instance is created.
I know how to listen for the JMS message on the queue, but I don't how to send a JMS message from a process.
Also Can I create process by sending the Notification to the process instead of a JMS message. But the process to be created is not a subprocess i.e. Can notification be send accross different processes.
Any information or example in this regard would be helpful.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: user9945154 on Apr 22, 2009 7:46 PM

Hi,
Here's one approach to sending JMS messages from an Oracle BPM process. If you're doing this just to send a message into another process, do not take this approach. It's far easier and quicker if you do this using the OOTB "send notification" logic.
These steps describe how to do this using WebLogic. The steps would be different if you're using another ap server / JMS provider.
1. Guessing you've already done this, but first expose the two required WebLogic jar files for JMS messaging as Java components in the External Resources. The two files for WebLogic are weblogic.jar and wljmsclient.jar” (located in the < WebLogic home directory > /weblogic/server/lib” directory).
AquaLogic BPM JMS Queue Listener for WebLogic 8.1
2. You've probably already done this, but add an External Resource to represent the J2EE container:
• Name: “weblogicJ2EE” - this is important and will be used in the next step
• Supported Type: “GENERIC_J2EE”
• Initial Context Factory: “weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory”
• URL: “t3://localhost:7001”
• Principal: and Credentials: whatever userid and password you defined to access theWebLogic administrative console.
3. Create the External Resource that represents the send queue configuration. In this example, I'm calling it “WebLogic Send Queue”. This is important - remember what you named it because you will use this name in the logic that sends the JMS message. This new External Resource is configured as:
• J2EE: “weblogicJ2EE” (same name as the second External Resource you created)
• Destination Type: “QUEUE”
• Lookup Name: “weblogic.examples.jms.exampleQueue”
• Connection Factory Lookup Name: “weblogic.examples.jms.QueueConnectionFactory”
4. Here's the logic to send a Message to the Queue
<pre class="jive-pre">msg as String = "Hello World"
jmsMsg as Fuego.Msg.JmsMessage
msg = "<?xml version=\"1.0\"?><Msg>" + msg + "</Msg></xml>"
jmsMsg = JmsMessage(type : JmsMessageType.TEXT)
jmsMsg.textValue = msg
sendMessage DynamicJMS
using configuration = "WebLogic Send Queue",
message = jmsMsg</pre>
Note that the “sendMessage” method uses the configuration parameter “WebLogic Send Queue”. You previously created a JMS messaging service External Resource with this name in the third step.
Again, please don't go this route if you're just using it to send notifications between processes,
Dan

FCC configuration in Sender File Channel Without any key field name

Hi Everyone,
We have below flat file generated from ECC using standard tcode.
The flat file is fixed length file and first record is header record followed by line items.
There is no key field name in the file name.
Can we read the file and convert into xml without any key field name?
I want to understand if the FCC configuration for above file can be done without key name or not.
Thanks,
Vertika

Hello,
AFAIK, using FCC i really doubt u can convert file into xml.
So technically, there are two options either read each line one by one and then do conversions in ur mapping or write a custom module which will read ur input file and convert into xml.
Configuring Generic Sender File CC Adapter
Thanks
Amit Srivastava

File sender adapter:FILE to IDOC without BPM, can't see in SXMB_MONI.

Hi all
I have a FILE - XI - IDOC Async scenario without BPM.
I configured FILE sender adapter and IDOC receiver adapter. I made a mapping to transfer file data to the structure of IDOC.
Now when i am trying to load the file using command prompt, i cud see nothing in the monitoring. Whereas if i go to the communication channel monitoring of runtime workbench, i saw that CC is polling correctly and was reading the file also.
And also wen i saw in the processed folder which i mentioned in the CC configuration for the ARCHIVE DIRECTORY, i saw that file got transferred to the folder also.
I don't understand why i cant see anything in the monitoring.
Could anybody help me to rectify the problem. Is there anything i m missing ?
Regards
Naina

Rajesh/Amar
TCode:: SXMB_ADM->Integration engine configuration->specific configuration->runtime
Trace_Level = 3 then you can get all MONI PIPELINE Steps also
I did this change but cudn't see anything in SXMB_MONI.
This is how i have configured my process:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/FiletoMultipleIDOCSplittingwithoutBPM
But instead of IDOC splitting i have simple FILE - XI -IDOC scenario.
I have configured everything exaclty the same way it is mentioned here. But for me the process is not visible at all.
I can't even see the first request message in the monitoring.
This is the message i can see in the communication channel monitoring:
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Success Channel CC_*: Entire file content converted to XML format
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Warning Channel CC_*: Empty document found. Proceed without sending message
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Success File "/xyz/ABC.txt" archived after processing
Is there any problem with the file and that could be the reason it cant convert the file to the request message MT_REQUEST and thus am not able to see anything in monitoring.
help me guys....this is a simple process and i m stuck...its frustrating
Regards
Naina

TWO SENDER FILE CHANNELS POLLING SAME DIRECTORY

I have a requirement to send a single file from a single FTP location to two different Target FTP locations as a passthrough interfaces. PI version 7.31
I thought of doing it through two different interfaces, both FTP to FTP keeping source same and destination differently
For First target (T1)Created dummy interfaces(Out/inbound) in ESR, created a configuration scenarion ,Sender and reciver FILE channels in ID, created an ICO.
For the second Target(T2) : can i use the same dummy interfaces as used in first while creating Sender channel?
can i use the same Sender channel as in first scenario to the ICO of Interface for second Target(T2)--> it gave error, same sender channel(IF FILE) channel can't be used to different Sender Agreements/Integrated Configuration Objects. So i copied the sender channel with a different name and used it in second Interface.
Reciever File channel obviously different for both cases with different server details and direcories.
My fear is, if i can go with this set up as we have two sender FTP channels polling on the same FTP directory, so possibility of lock issue and channel are operational on a mapping of one hour(first one 8to10 and second one 9to12, so 9 to 10 both channles poll simultaneously).
Please suggest any better way of handling this, or to resolve the lock issue ?could clusterSyncMode=lock help here?

Hello,
I think u are getting confused.
>>My query was, if we could use two recievers(service) inside a single ICO, without giving any condition. Answer it please in YES or NO?
Yes, indeed u can do it.
IF YES, then how would the message dynamically determine the correct/specific reciever out of the two recievers configured in ICO?
>>Since u want to send same message to two different FTP servers so u don't have to worry about dynamically determining receivers. As soon as file sender adapter picks the file it will route the message to both the receivers and eventually send the same request message to two different FTP servers.
Hence i assume, for every file kept on source direcory, there would be two messages( 2 files) going to be created on two different targets? YES or NO?
>>YES
Thanks
Amit Srivastava

Sender File Channel unable to process

Hi,
I have a scenario where we are using a sender file channel. It polls every 1 hour at the source directory.
Suddenly yesterday the channel stopped processing and never polled again automatically.
It started the processing but did not finish the processing. (There is no error)
Now when I manually restart the channel it directly goes to the polling interval and gives the log :
"Polling interval started. Length: 3600.0 seconds" every 1 hour. It does not start the processing of channel.
As an additional information I checked that the Server to which it is polling had some error at the time when it stop processing.
Please help how could I start the channel processing now? Is there some kind of lock issue or anything else.
Thanks,
Vikas

Hello Vikas,
In addition to the previous posts, check the following as well.
1)
As I donu2019t know which SP level your system is on, please check the note below and apply the patch accordingly.
> 1317686 - Adapter Framework Scheduler may fail to remove a job
2)
Check whether you have deployed on your system the patches described in this note (as as mentioned in the post above).
> 1083488u2013 XI FTP/JDBC sender channel stop polling indefinitely
3)
Please check if there are locks (as as mentioned in the post above) for this channel according to section u201CHow to manually delete hanging Enqueue-Locksu201C in note:
> 821267 - FAQ: XI 3.0 / PI 7.0/ PI 7.1 File Adapter
Follow the instructions and delete the lock related to the stopped communication channel.
For the 7.1 versions, please note that the Lock Manager is under the /nwa/locks, or on the location "Availability and Performance Management -> Locks".
4)
Configure a timeout for the FTP connection.
In more recent support packages you can set the "Timeout" parameter available in the "FTP Connection Parameters" section.
Alternatively, please enable the "Advanced Mode" for the respective FTP communication channel in the Integration Directory and add an entry "ftp.timeout"=timeoutSecs (without any quotation marks) to the "Additional Parameters" section, where timeoutSecs is the desired FTP timeout in seconds.
Please refer to the note below for further details on this.
> 849089 - XI 3.0 / PI 7.0 File Adapter: FTP Timeout Handling
Cheers,
Jorge Eidelwein

Sending files with and without BPM in one Interface.

Hi All,
I have to send three files to my receiver system. 2 files of same structure after little mapping need to be merged into single file (Using BPM) and once this is successful the third file needs to be posted without any mapping.
I have thought of
1. using two communication channels activated using a UNIX script externally
2. using two comm channels with a activation time difference, i.e the 3rd file should be polled after some time when the first two files polled, but this is not helpful as if the two files doesnt process properly then 3rd file is not desired.
Now my question is can we do this scenario using 1 comm. channel with EOIO , masking or anyother option.
Note: the third file should always be send after the processing of the first two files completes successfully.
Thanks & Regards.

1. put two file in source folder and make synch scenario using BPM ,
2. put third file in some other folder than source folder.
3. after getting successful synch file responce, in the synch receiver file channel run OS command to put third file from other folder to source folder.
hows that ???

SAP XI File Adaptor (FTP mode) Sender Channel FTP commands

I have a service set up to communicate via ftp to an external partner. Their FTP server is secured to a point that I am unable to connect with normal settings. They claim that the FTP server follows the RFC 959 standard and therefore we should be able to connect and extract a file from their server. Not happening!
The question:
What are the exact ftp commands issued by a Sender channel configuration to an external FTP server? I have all the usual setting: user/pass/path/server/file (with wild card).
I can not find a definitive listing of commands issued by the file adapter in ftp mode to the remote ftp server. Not just a listing but an actual flow of commands issued would be useful.
Would appreciate some help/direction.
Thanks,
Mike

Hi Michael,
Please look at the FTP Server parameters...
1) if you have given the uncheck the anonymous login they can connect with out giving the username and password to connect to the FTP server...please check this paramerter and also make sure that if are mainting the username and password it should be the same they are using to access the FTP server.
2) Please check the port and ip address
For more information i would suggest you to look at the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/0b/9a50465ccf84479e39a6d50c90fb3f/frameset.htm
Could you please reply us what would be exact problem u r facing?
Thanks and Regards,
Chandu.

File picked up by sender channel but not seen in CC monitoring nor in moni

Dear All,
It is a file to JDBC scenario where the sender communication channel picks up a file and sends it to several receivers interfaces ( 1 jdbc receiver channel). The file gets picked up by sender communication channel, but problem is that it does not get traced in communication channel monitoring, not even in message monitoring in RWB and SXMB_MONI. Thus no file processing. Sometimes this does not happen and the file gets traced in either of the monitoring tools. Please help as to why would this happen.
The scenario works correctly at times. its configured correctly. Please guide.
Thanks & Regards,
Priyanka Salvi

Hi,
Thanks. No, archiving faulty source files functionaly was not used earlied.
I enabled it by giving a path in the FTP server itself, but no files were placed there in the same case.
Please give me some examples of OS commands.
The file is picked up but it seems it is unable to read/forward for further processing.
This is because after the file is picked up, no messages are found with the outbound interface as well in message monitoring.
I am manually placing the file at the required path and the procsessing mode in CC is delete.
The receiver determination and all other configurations are correct.
I had tried by creating a new sender CC and deactiving the earlied one. Using this files were picked up and processed for few days and now again the same problem.

Verification of recvr file channel configuration without sending a message

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for