0(zero) or 1.1 charectored interface mapping should be ignore the values

hi,
0(zero) or 1.1 charectored interface mapping should be ignore the values
bye
suresh

Hi Suresh,
Please eloborate your question.
Regards,
UP

Similar Messages

Interface Mapping not supported in the JPA specification?

Are there any plans to add Interface support in the JPA specification? It is not supported by JPA annotations, which seems quite disruptive to proper object oriented design. However, individual implementations of JPA seem to support this:
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/core/reference/en/html_single/#inheritance-tableperclass
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Using_EclipseLink_JPA_Extensions_%28ELUG%29#How_to_Use_the_.40VariableOneToOne_Annotation
There is visible interest in getting this implemented at an Annotation level for Hibernate also but the developers for Hibernate point out that this isn't even in the JPA specifications.
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/ANN-9
https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=941363&sid=4abdbc72cbf04380f4a8e2cadd7dfada&start=15
Is this being talked about/in the works for JPA? Why not include @VariableOneToOne in the spec? It would seem to be quite an essential feature for wide adoption.

Hi,
You can only choose the Interface mapping for the Enhanced recevier determination in the extended tab of Receiver determination. & I dont see the Interface mapping in the select list.
Where do I have to check for the proper outbound message???
Regards

Interface Mapping not listing in the Extended Reciever Determination

Hi,
The Interface Mapping is not shown in my Extended receiver determination. I have created and activated the IM & MM using the MT - Receivers within the SAP Basis.
Regards
Unni

Hi,
You can only choose the Interface mapping for the Enhanced recevier determination in the extended tab of Receiver determination. & I dont see the Interface mapping in the select list.
Where do I have to check for the proper outbound message???
Regards

Runtime interface mapping selection based on the target message. SYNCHRNOUS

Hi,
X system sends the data to SAP PI through SOAP. SAP PI determines the target operation after performing the RFC look in ECC whether to create/change/update master data in ECC. So SAP PI has to execute different mapping program bsed on the response from RFC lookup. This can be achieved through Enhanced Receiver Determination. My question is here the X system needs the final response...i.e SYNCHRONOUS interface. How can we implement this requirement ?
Thanks in advance,

Hi Mythree,
>>Can we handle the response (synchronous interface) using enhanced interface determination.
No.. But if you choose to use Enhanced Receiver Determination then your scenario might work!!! (Hoping that you are in PI7.1 or I7.0 SPS23. Check this link http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/frameset.htm)
If you have doubt in creating the Enhanced RD then check this wiki page http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/EnhancedReceiverDeterminationinSAP+XI
Now once the Receivers are identified in Runtime, you can use a normal (sync to sync interface ) interface determination and get back the response.
Regards
Suraj

Problem In Interface Mapping

Hi,
I am having an Interface Mapping involving two mapping programs in the following sequence:
1) Message Mapping
2) Java Mapping
There are two Message Interfaces on the source side and one MI on the target side. Now the problem is that only the Java mapping is getting executed not the Message Mapping.
Please note the following points:
1) There is no error while executing the Interface Mapping.
2) The Message Mapping is getting executed perfectly.
Please let me know what could be the possible error.
Thanks,
Abhishek.

Hi Abhishek,
As you said you have two source structure and one target structure.
after executing the first mapping output is not same as the input required by the second mapping.
Also keep in mind that you can not persist the message here so the output of first mapping should not modify the structure. You can anly modify the values.
you can confirm the same with some dummy scenario
Thanks
Sunil Singh

Interface mapping Object does not exist in runtime cache

I am getting the following error after importing IR into our test system (PI7.0 SP10).
Interface mapping Object ID 19C3AC9D13B03787AEEB85169D0B6900 Software Component 8C51B2209F3C11DB94CEEB180DDF0074 does not exist in runtime cache Exception of class CX_XMS_SYSERR_MAPPING
You want to execute interface mapping Object ID 19C3AC9D13B03787AEEB85169D0B6900 Software Component 8C51B2209F3C11DB94CEEB180DDF0074 . However,the data of this interface mapping is missing in the runtime cache. Activate the interface mapping in the Integration Repository.
I cannot change the mapping and reactivate - as this cannot be changed.
I have run SXI_Cache, Cleared SLD caches on IR and ID and run cacherefresh=full, but no luck!
The mapping is there and I can test it in the IR.
Any thoughts?

I had this problem today, maybe this helps someone when searching about this (at least this is the first hit at a very big search engine when searching for interface mapping does not exist...)
I have a RFC => PI => File scenario. I was aware that this would need to be asynchronous so I set up the message interface (service interface for PI > 7.0) as asynchronous inbound. This is the file receiver part of the interface.
Hints on the error: Audit Log in message details of RWB showed a line like this: RFC adapter received sRFC for ZMY_FM from <sender SID>/<sender client>. Attempting to send message synchronously. This of course could not work as file is asynchronous by default.
Bottom line however was, to make the call of the sender RFC asynchronous by using "in background task" like so:
CALL FUNCTION 'ZMY_FM'
 IN BACKGROUND TASK
 DESTINATION 'PI_DEST'
 EXPORTING
 t_file = lt_file.
COMMIT WORK.
Don't forget the commit work here.
Hope this helps.
Cheers
Jens

The question about Interface Mapping in BPM

Hello,
I am a few confused about an Interface Mapping in BPM at the Design step.
I have a task to transmit and trasform two messages of two sender file adapter to two IDOCs messages and then to send them to SAP system.
I use BPM.
But I don't understand what types of message interfaces should I use for source and target interfaces in Interface Mapping? As to the target interface I understand it must be abstract but which of interfaces exactly?
Actually there are some questions here:
1) If the source interface should be abstract or real in Interface Mapping?
2) If the target interface should be the abstract interface of Receive Step object or the abstract interface of Send Step object?
3) And what the message types should I use for the source and target message interfaces in Interface Mapping? If I understand correctly that these message types

hi igor,
you have to import the IDOC Types under the imported objects in the integration repository objects,
what are all the data that coming out from the file adapter, you design the datatype.
the target IDOC should be real and you do the mapping for the all necessary fields.
refer: --
File to IDOC:
Re: how to Sending XML data to idoc
IDOC Mapping:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/77/a1d48b1ce06d40932e0a26f3c117ce/frameset.htm

How to get the name of Interface Mapping ?

Beside the information given by setParameter() i like to know the name of the "Interface Mapping". Does somebody know how to get this information ?

Hi Frank,
not really there are a lot of information in there but not the name of the interfacemapping. By iterating through the xiContext given by setParameter() i got the following output:
As defined in StreamTransformationConstants:
MessageClass = RQ
VersionMajor = 003
VersionMinor = 000
ProcessingMode = A
MessageId = B9EFFFC05A7411D9CA2F00306E5DA806
RefToMessageId = 00000000000000000000000000000000
ConversationId = null
TimeSent = 20041230150856
Interface = ORDERS.ORDERS05
InterfaceNamespace = urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
SenderParty = null
SenderPartyAgency = null
SenderPartyScheme = null
SenderService = BS_QGDBW
ReceiverName = msgIF_ORDERS_DATARIVER
ReceiverNamespace = http://prototype.com/xi/test
ReceiverParty = null
ReceiverPartyAgency = null
ReceiverPartyScheme = null
ReceiverService = BS_QGDBW
MappingTrace =
Additional Information found:
Direction = 0
MessageID = B9EFFFC05A7411D9CA2F00306E5DA806
BusinessSystemSender = BS_QGDBW
BusinessSystemReceiver = BS_QGDBW
SenderNamespace = urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
SenderName = ORDERS.ORDERS05
QueueID = null
SenderSystem = BS_QGDBW
ReceiverSystem = BS_QGDBW
These are interresting informations but nothing to find out which interface-mapping-name has called the execute-method....
Regards,
Urs

About interface mapping

what are there case about interface mapping?
i knew that the following:
outbound to inbound
abstract to abstract.
what else the case?

Hi joy zheng ,
These r the details about interface mapping :
Interface Mappings
You can define mappings for an interface pair (source and target interface) by using message interfaces and message types in the Integration Repository.You can also define the corresponding mappings when the source or target interface is an IDoc, an RFC, or another interface connected by an adapter.
When defining mapping programs for request, response, or fault messages, the definition is first separated from the interfaces that reference the corresponding message types. Furthermore, you can reuse a message type for multiple interfaces. This means that the simple definition of a mapping program is not sufficient to establish a connection (that is based on the assignment of outbound and inbound interfaces).
This role is undertaken by the interface mapping:
●     An interface mapping specifies the corresponding mapping programs for request, response, or fault messages for a selected interface pair. You use an interface mapping to register mappings for an interface pair.
●     You can also specify multiple mapping programs to be executed one after the other in the case of requests and responses for an interface mapping.
You can also define multiple interface mappings for the same interface pair, to provide multiple variants in the Integration Repository. At configuration time, the customer can select the appropriate mapping in an interface determination and save it in the Integration Directory
Use :
Interface mappings register your mapping program for an interface pair in the Integration Repository. If you require a mapping at runtime, it is sufficient to select the interface mapping for the interface pair at configuration time . The Integration Server uses the interface mapping to identify associated mapping programs for request messages, response messages, fault messages, or all three.
Features
Executing Multiple Mapping Programs for One Direction
By using an interface mapping you can execute multiple mapping programs consecutively for the transformation of a request or response message. In such cases, an interface mapping comprises multiple steps for which the following applies:
●     The steps are executed in the sequence specified (from top to bottom). The result of the mapping program from the previous step is forwarded to the mapping program of the subsequent step.
●     Each step can reference a mapping program that executes a 1:1, 1:n, n:1, or an m:n transformation. In the case of multi-mappings (1:n, n:1, or m:n), the previous step must create the same number of messages that the subsequent step expects.
●     Multi-mappings use one envelope to put all messages in one structure. If one of the steps references a multi-mapping program, all subsequent steps must use the same envelope.
The mapping for a request message comprises two message mapping programs: one 1:1 transformation and one 1:n transformation. Since the latter message mapping uses the multi-mapping envelope for both the target message and the source message, the message mapping for the 1:1 transformation must also create a transformation result with a multi-mapping envelope.
You do not strictly need to divide up one direction of the whole mapping into different steps. However, this enables all the message formats in one system landscape to be mapped to a central message format, for example. This results in less mapping programs being required because you no longer need to be able to map all the different message formats to each other.
Activities
       1.      Create your interface mapping on the design maintenance screen of the Integration Builder (see also: Creating an Object).
You can also create multiple interface mappings for the same interface pair.
       2.      Enter the source and target interfaces that require a mapping of the request message, the response message, the fault message, or all three, in the table of the same name. The following restrictions apply:
○     If you want to use the interface mapping in a transformation step in an integration process, you must only specify abstract message interfaces. Furthermore, all objects (integration process, interface mapping, and all objects referenced by the interface mapping) must be in the same software component version. If you want to reference objects from underlying software component versions, you must access the objects from the Basis Objects branch (in the navigation tree or using an input help) (see also: Underlying Software Component Versions).
○     If you want to map multiple messages to each other by using a multi-mapping, you can only specify asynchronous interfaces (for further restrictions, see: Multi-Mappings). If any message interfaces are missing, you can also create them by using the functionCreate New Object ().
If the interface cannot be imported or cannot be created in the Integration Repository (in the case of an external adapter, for example), you must enter the interface names manually. However, it is not possible to check the technical name in this case.
       3.      To import the properties of the interfaces, choose Read Interfaces. The table in the lower area displays tab pages for the request message, response message, and if available, for the fault message, for each mode of the interfaces (either synchronous or asynchronous).
       4.      To develop an external mapping program, export the XSD schema of the respective request or response message as a zip file after you have imported the interfaces. The zip file can contain multiple schema files that reference each other, for example in a multi-mapping. In this case, the schema with the global message element has the name MainSchema.
       5.      To reference a mapping program for the respective message, you have the following options:
○     Select an existing mapping program from the Integration Repository by using the input help (). If this is a message mapping, the default setting of the input help only displays those message mappings that are found using the source and target message in the Integration Repository (in multi-mappings, the first source and target messages are used as the search criteria). However, you can also display any number of message mappings, for example, because you are constructing a mapping from several mapping programs with intermediate instances which have no message types.
○     You can create message mappings directly from the interface mapping. To do this, select the mapping type Message Mapping in the Type column. Position the cursor in the Name column and choose the function Create New Message Mapping () in the Mapping Program frame. The Integration Builder copies the specifications of the messages and their occurrence directly from the interface mapping.
An interface mapping can only reference mapping programs that belong to the same or an underlying software component version of the interface mapping. This ensures that the mapping program can be shipped together with the interface mapping (see: Software Logistics).
       6.      If you are not using a mapping for a fault message, you can execute multiple mapping programs in succession for request and response messages:
○     To insert an additional line for a mapping program, choose .
○     To delete the registration for a mapping program, choose .
At runtime, the mapping programs are executed from top to bottom.
       7.      Save the interface mapping.
The following web-site gives complete details about interface mapping :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/12/05731a10264057badc32d3d3957015/content.htm
**********Please reward points if u find this useful
cheers,
gyanaraj

How to use rfcnormalizer.jar in interface mapping

Hi
Iam getting one error while doing xml file to RFC scenario.
the error is like this
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: functiontemplate from repository was <null>: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: functiontemplate from repository was <null>
As a solution for this i got SAP Note 730870.
here i have to download rfcnormalizer.jar
i have uploaded in integration repository under imported object.
but iam not able to see this in interface mapping
now i have to use this in interface mapping .
Please give me step by step how to use this in interface mapping
how the interface mapping should be like
Regards
veena

Hi,
The RfcAdapter trys to find a Sender Agreement for this RFC call but the lookup failes. The values used for this lookup are:
Sender Party/Sender Service: The values from Party and Service belonging to the sender channel.
Sender Interface: The name of the RFC function module.
Sender Namespace: The fix RFC namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions
Receiver Party/Receiver Service: These fields are empty. This will match the wildcard
Regards,
Suryanarayana

Message Mapping vs Interface Mapping test tabs giving different results.

Hi all,
I am developing an interface that always requires an output file to be created (even if there is no data). I have found a way to change my select statement in the JDBC sender to initiate the message even if there isn't any data (using UNION select -1 ID, '' col1, '' col2, etc.) and that seems to work fine. I then put logic in the message mapping to suppress the row that contains the -1 ID value, which would result in an empty file when there is no other data, and should result in a file containing only the correct data when there is data.
So, my problem: I am always getting empty files with this logic. I tested the logic in the message mapping test tab and it worked perfectly, however when I test it using the interface mapping test tab it results in what becomes an empty file!
My source and destination structures are fairly simple:
Root
--row
ID
col1
col2
The logic I use to suppress the ID = -1 row is:
=removeContexts([]ifWithoutElse([keepss=true]Not([]equalsS([]ID, Constant([value=-1]))), SplitByValue([type=Each value]row)))
Obviously, I'm stumped - any help would be appreciated!
Edited by: Mike Morrison on Sep 23, 2010 5:04 PM

Hi Mike,
Can you quote the error log..u r getting error in message mappin or interface mapping?
Please suggest the test results for both the mappings.
Thanks,
Sushama

INTERFACE MAPPING wa not Displaying in Receiver Determination (Extended)

Hi friends,
I'm doing Enhanced Receiver determination.. but in this if i select Extended radio button in the receiver determination .. I'm not gettting any search help for selecting my Interface mappings..
what misteqe i did.. for getting those interface mappings in Receiver Determination does we need to do..any special things .
i followed the bellow blog.. but like that i'm not getting... and how many interface mappings do we need to create for this..
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
plz suggest me..
thanks
BABU

how many interface mappings do we need to create for this..
One
Make sure u have activated ur Interface Mapping. Also recheck the sender interface and the interface u r selecting in Interface Determination step.
Regards,
Prateek

Interface mapping error

Hi Gurus,
I creating the response message mapping
1)to split the batch PO requestxml file to single request xml using multimapping and i change the occurremce of source 1 and target message 0...unbounded..
2) another response message mapping to convert singlePO xml file to cxml (this is kind of xml file)
I included the above two mappings in interface mapping IM_MI_PORDER_OB_PORDER_IB
im getting the following error
activation of the change list canceled Check result for Interface Mapping IM_MI_PORDER_OB_PORDER_IB | http://access/prototypes/PECOSPOXML: Mapping program Message Mapping mm_pomultiple_single1 | http://access/prototypes/PECOSPOXML does not match the interface mapping. The number or frequencies of source or target messages for the message mapping are not identical to the number or frequencies of source or target interfaces.
do i need to change the occurence of the 2nd maaping as well.
source structure 0..unbounded target structure 0...unbounded only in second message mapping
Can you please help me resolving this issue
Thanks,
Regards,
Jay

Hi Bhaskar,
POExport1 should be mapped to POExport2.
my source structure
<Messages>
<Message1>
<POExport>1..1
my target structure
<Messages>
<Message1>
<POExport>0..unbounded
im doing message split(1..n) using multimapping for response...
For request message there is no split
Im including these two mappings in one message interface .
when i activated i got the error
Mapping program Message Mapping mm_pomultiple_single1 | http://access/prototypes/PECOSPOXML (response messaage mapping)does not match the interface mapping. The number or frequencies of source or target messages for the message mapping are not identical to the number or frequencies of source or target interfaces.
So after this I changed the occurence of the target interface to 0..unbounded keeping the source interface and click read interfaces,i can see only the request tab and not the response tab.
is multimapping possible in PI 7.0 if possible how can i solve this issue...
or is there any alternative to this -> response message should be split and sent to XI keeping the request the same.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Regards,
Jay

Interface-Determination: selecting an interface mapping not possible

Hi all,
I configured a scenario CRM (IDoc) -> XI -> Oracle database using BPM. Now I want to configure the same scenario without a business process. But in the interface determination it's neither possible to drag&drop the interface mapping, nor select it from the list. What's the problem?
Thanks in advance
Dominic

Dominic,
Like pointed by Michal , you have missed something somewhere.
1.Look into message mapping and check what the source and target message types are.
2. Look into Interface mapping and check if the message interfaces use the same message types as in the message mapping
3. Look into Interface determination and see if the source and inbound message interface is the same as in Interface mapping.
4. Make sure interface and message mapping is activated.!
Regards
Bhavesh

Two Message Mappings in one Interface Mapping without using BPM

Hello Experts,
I have this scenario, please help me
I have to execute two mappings of which one is a java mapping and then the other is a message mapping sequentially.
The mapping is something like below
Message1 -> (java Mapping) -> Message2
Message2
Message1 -> (Message Mapping) -> Message3
Based on the value in Message2 I have to map Message1 to Message3
I am not an expert in java so please give me options that doesn't involve changing of java code.
The above 2 mappings have to be implemented in only one interface mapping.
Suggestions please.

Hi Ravi!
You say message2 dependes on message1 and message3 is mapped from message1 but using also values from message2? But this means, that whole mapping dependes only on message1!
So change your mapping and use the one not based on message2, but message1. Put these as a condition in interface determination and based on these values use the correct mapping.
Peter
p.s. I'm not sure, if I got your requirement correctly, but your target message dependes only on message1 (since message2 dependes on it too), so this whole mapping can be done as 1. Unfortunately, you'll probably have to change your java part. Bur definetely, Raj is right.
Edited by: Peter Jarunek on Feb 20, 2008 5:36 PM

0(zero) or 1.1 charectored interface mapping should be ignore the values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for