1 week old Mac Pro & Seagate drive - on its way out already?

Hi y'all,
This post is just an observation..
I just noticed tonight a constant whirring kinda noise from my Mac Pro. Thought it was the DVD drive/s but no different when ejected. Decided to unmount the drives one at a time and it turns out to be the Apple supplied 500GB Seagate making the noise. It sounds like a low toned whine with a change in note every revolution. Very annoying, but NOT as annoying as having to uninstall and back it up ready for a replacement!
Thank goodness for Applecare, I'll update with the response I get tomorrow.
Well I won't be buying another Seagate, think I'll buy another Maxtor Maxline II as it has been very reliable.... and quiet to boot!
Ciao 4 now
B

AMUG will probably run some tests and do their normal thorough job reviewing the card.
Someone found that the Intel SATA chipset used in the MacPro is capable of RAID5, but it isn't enabled, which would be interesting also.
The drive trays are cable-less, no data or power, rather they plug into and make connection on a backplane, and no way or room for cables - you'd probably have trouble closing the case and/or need to put the drives in backwards.
So running cables outside, out another PCI slot, kinda sloppy, and you'll need shielded cables.

Similar Messages

  • Universal Binary Shockwave for Mac? Is Director on its way out?

    Anyone have any thoughts about if and when there will be a
    universal binary version of shockwave for the Mac?
    Also, Director seems to receive very little attention from
    Adobe. Anyone know anything or care to speculate about Adobe's
    commitment to maintaining Director. I'm guessing that adobe will
    eventually ad 3D capabilities to Flash and do away with Director.
    My company use to do a lot with Director, now we have a scant few
    clients who bring us work that requires it.
    As the Art Director for my company I have had a somewhat
    passive role with Director, creating art and presentations that
    only require basic navigation and animation and handing off to a
    true programmer when more complex functionality is needed. Our
    programmer has left and it seems on some level I am now assuming
    the role of main director person, at least unofficially. I also
    have a beginner to intermediate level of proficiency with Flash.
    I'm pretty much left to teach myself what ever programming our
    clients need as it is needed. My plate is full and I'm trying to
    determine if I need to invest time in really learning lingo beyond
    my rudimentary working knowledge, or just concentrate on expanding
    my Flash knowledge base. If Flash did 3D, I would probably forget
    about Director because it seems like it is on it's way out and most
    of the things our clients need I think can be done in Flash
    although for standalone presentations, I prefer the seamless flow
    of Director to the "wait to load" result of Flash.
    Any thoughts on this?

    As Adobe says itself:
    A new version of Director will be released in the first half
    of 2007. It
    will be sold under the name Adobe Director. No features list
    available yet.
    That's the only information we have and you'll have to live
    with it until
    the release (or beta program just before).
    Adobe doesn't have anything else in its product range that
    comes close to
    Director and Shockwave. Shockwave 3D is still to this day the
    most reliable
    Web 3D plugin available (even if it has not the best
    rendering quality but
    sufficient for games, e-learning and 3D product assembly
    instructions).
    Adding 3D to Flash Player would mean a heavier download
    (Flash Player 9 is
    already 1 MB without the Yahoo toolbar).
    The other news it that Tom Higgins, the Director Technical
    Product Manager
    left. I believe his position has already been filled
    internally by someone
    else at Adobe (it's a huge company) or will be soon (haven't
    seen any job
    offer yet for this role).
    Best regards,
    Karl Sigiscar.
    http://www.chromelib.com/

  • I have a new Mac Pro.  I want to use my old Mac Pro as a storage drive for photos and old documents, linked to my new Mac Pro.  How do I set up the old computer?

    I have a new Mac Pro.  I want to use my old Mac Pro as a storage drive for photos and old documents, linked to my new Mac Pro.  How do I set up the old computer?  Both computers have OS X10.9.3.  Currently they are connected by a Firewire 800 cable.

    You certainly could keep the old Mac Pro in Firewire mode (hold down the T key on its keyboard as you boot) to show its drives on the new MP. This is basically as fast as putting the drives into a Firewire enclosure.
    Or you could boot it normally and share its files over the network using the Sharing panel of System Preferences. If you turn on both File and Screen Sharing, you don't even need to have a monitor attached - you can do all administration using screen sharing. However, this method requires that you open all files over the network, which will be slower than the direct-connect method above, and may also not work with all applications.
    Matt

  • 3 week yr old mac pro issues? HELP!!!

    just got my MBP about 3 weeks ago, i already had software problems ( had to erase and restore everything), i now have this tiny blue dot on the left side of my screen that is highly visable when dark images are up, but after numerous calls and a couple of visits to the apple store, they said its called a abnormal pixel and can't do nothing about its cause there is only one? and now when i play certian types of dvd's the images seem to freeze and appear very blocky where you cant enjoy the film cause the faces are so blurry...
    sadly, this is my frist mac. however ive heard nothing but good things about machine, but so far this comp has given me nothing but trouble...
    any suggestions guys?
    I tried going to the store and getting it replace, because I don’t think these types of malfunctions are normal for a 3 week old mac, but they seem to refuse in doing so… any words of advice????

    Good news (hopefully). That sounds like a 'stuck' pixel, not a 'dead' pixel. Stuck pixels can sometimes be fixed. One way is to display constantly rotating colors (solid red, solid green, solid blue), since toggling the pixel between the sub-pixels can sometimes kickstart the bad pixel.
    You can try "Pixel Fix":
    http://mac.softpedia.com/get/Dashboard-Widgets/Movies-TV/Pixel-Fix.shtml
    There's also a video file that is basically just a .mov of red/green/blue toggling out there.
    There are also some reports that "massaging" the area while these videos or programs run can help, but you of course run the risk of damaging other surrounding pixels.

  • Old Mac Pro vs. new iMac?

    I have a nearly three year old Mac Pro that is currently being serviced at my local Apple Store. For almost three years I have had trouble with it -- first it spontaneously rebooted itself which was fixed by replacing power supply, logic board and processor. The other problem is the recurring (but randomly recurring) seizing of Time Machine. I've tried three separate external hard drives, three different cables, all the FW ports, archive and reinstall twice, erase and reinstall twice, and hours on the phone with tech support. No one knows what to do. I have no confidence that they'll find anything this time either. I've just about had it. And my Apple Care runs out in two weeks. So...I'm thinking of getting a new iMac to replace it, because I'm not doing the heavy duty phot/video/design work on the Pro that I thought I was going to do. I know it's a hard question to answer, but aside from the speed, which I probably won't notice that much, what are the biggest trade-offs "stepping down" to the iMac? Thanks

    Your 2nd and 3rd disk drives will be external Firewire 800 drives. Slower than internal drives.
    You can't change your mind. No video card upgrades 2 years down the road. What you buy is what you live with. You can expand memory to 16GB (which seems plenty to me) and you can (with some effort) replace the disk drive with a larger one.
    On the other hand:
    1. Less money, a lot less.
    2. An awesome 27-inch monitor.
    3. Close to the same performance. See http://marketingtactics.com/Speedmark/
    4. Quiet.

  • Need a RAID that will work on both new and old Mac Pro

    Desperately need to expand my RAID storage, and also not quite ready to buy the new Mac Pro.   Are there any high quality 6TB+ RAID enclosures that will work on both the new and older non-firebolt Mac Pros?  I already have a sh*t load of 2TB 3.5 drives, so I only need an enclosure.  
    Even when i get the new macpro, I will use the old mac pro as a second station, so i need the RAID to work on both. 

    Why not go for a eSATA Raid and a cheap eSATA card for old Mac Pro  and get either a Thunderbolt to eSATA or USB 3.0 to eSATA adapter for your new Mac Pro? Thunderbolt to eSATA is faster, of course.
    I have a MacPower/Inxtron Hydra 4 x 2 TB eSata for example. I have a eSATA card in my Mac Pro and when I need to use it on my Retina Macbook Pro I use a USB 3.0 to eSATA adapter. Gives me about 240 MBytes/s with Raid 5.
    On the eSATAcard it's just a little bit more, like 250/260 MBytes/s.

  • Mac Pro Internal Drive randomly disappears on boot up

    I have a nearly two year old Mac Pro and the non boot internal hard drive has started to randomly not appear. When it doesn't show up, I have to boot the machine from the Leopard DVD to get it to reappear. I run the disk utility and it shows no problems.
    What is happening and how can I prevent this from reoccuring?

    Hi H_Factor73,
    I have a very similar situation happen to me a little while back. In my case, I should have been more alert. I had to much faith in risking not backing everything of that particular HDD up. The entire disappearing act was a warning that it was failing but I thought all would be fine anyway. It kept pulling the disappearing act randomly and coming back from time to time. I don't know how it happened or what the culprit was or why but one of the HDD failed big time in the end...
    I tried Disk Warrior for recovery which worked wonders the first time for me. To make a long story short, the HDD in question died and I did lose some data. I brought it back to the local vender who was very understanding and I got a complete refund. I got lucky. I since bought an extra external HDD (same brand which was Western Digital) and ALL my data is backed up now. Good luck finding your answers. I just thought I'd put in my 2 cents' worth.
    Rio.

  • Can't install OSX 10.7 Lion on old Mac Pro...

    i've got an old mac pro... i think it is 2007 or 2008 vintage... it is the 2.66mghzzz model...
    it is so old it can't run OSx 10.8 and up... so I am stuck running 10.7xxx
    anyway, system disk died recently...
    made an OSX 10.7 install thingy on a 8gb USB drive using my new Macbook Pro...
    problem is the install keeps hanging after starting the install... i've attached screenshots showing how far it gets...
    i've let it sit for a few hours and no progress... i reckon it should normally finish installing of a USB stick in maybe 30 minutes or so?
    is it possible that the 4tb SSHD drive i am installing onto is too big for this machine?
    it has been using other 4tb drives so not sure this is an issue?
    really stuck here... argh...
    thanks

    thanks for your reply... 
    yes, I realize it will only install on older macs...  my Mac Pro is the 1,1 model...  the 2.66mhz processor is from the 2006-2008 era....
    i believe it shipped with 10.4 or 10.5 OSX...
    it was previously running 10.7.5 which is the newest OSX that was allowed to be installed on it....
    so it should allow 10.7 to be installed?  Or do I have to start with the much older osx?
    I downloaded Lion 10.7 from the mac app store and it of course wouldn't let me install it on anything, even the 4tb SSHD drive when I connected it via USB/SATA adapter to macbook pro as it is too old for running 10.7 install on this machine but I was apple to use SuperDuper app to make a boot drive of the 10.7 download form the mac app store onto a 8gb USB flash drive and make it bootable...
    The 4tb SSHD drive appears to work on system as I can run disk utility and format it and mount it etc etc...
    Perhaps there is something wrong with my install USB flash drive I made?  I am really stuck here...
    thanks for your help...

  • Bought internal bluetooth card in 5 year old Mac Pro; not working right?

    Bought internal bluetooth adaptor for my 5 year old Mac Pro. It searches for bluetooth devices, but dosn't find bluetooth devices; any advice?
    I secured it interlanly with the two screws supplied. Had replacement card sent out, but same thing?
    Using it with Apple Magic Mouse. I know mouse works as I tried it on friends new iMac.
    Using latest Snow Leopard, and have seperate boot drive with Lion. Dosn't work on either.
    Bluetooth ikon shoes in bar at top, and all software functions normally, just dosn't detect anything?
    Thanks.

    Try smc and pram reset.

  • 6-month old Mac Pro has already had a new logic board and power supply

    At a cost of $400 in shipping and a one-month wait, my 5-month old Mac Pro got a new power supply and logic board
    Now I keep getting kernel panics, runaway kernel_task in Activity Monitor, and corrupted boot drives
    External Firewire drives work some of the time, and occasionally my USB devices dont work either
    This computer is a nightmare - how do I begin to figure out if this is OS (10.6.4) or hardware related?
    The extended AHT test reports that all is OK - as does an extended memory test using Applejack
    Should I do firmware updates and re-install the 10.6.4 combo pack, or am I just wasting more of my time?
    I've got 4 macs and this is the only one that works badly - I think Apple's OS updates are getting as bad as Windows updates

    My first question is why you spent $400 to get a 5 month old system fixed. That should have been covered under the warranty. So someone ripped you off, or you left out some key details.
    And if you had both the logic board and PSU replaced, did you ever stop to think that maybe the problem lies with the power coming into your house? It's not really the big power spikes or blackouts you need to worry about, since those are pretty rare. What you need to worry about are the small fluctuations in voltage that happen several hundred times a day, if not an hour. Sometimes there's not quite enough power, other times there's a little too much, and all of this takes a steady toll on the PSU. It will do what it can to try and feed the rest of the computer a steady diet of electricity, but sometimes a jolt will get past it and start damaging other components. It could even cause data corruption on your HDD.
    If the PSU and logic board already went, who knows what damage it may have caused to anything else. It may just be taking longer to show up.
    It might also be that whomever ripped you off to the tune of $400 simply traded you one defective logic board for another. Or maybe they don't really know how to protect against ESD. I once saw a repair shop where the techs smoked in the same room they did the repairs. Sadly, for every one good tech out there, there's probably at least 3 complete idiots. Kind of like auto mechanics.
    And I never have problems with Windows or Apple updates. Seems like on Windows the majority of people who have problems with updates are either running some program designed to change the way Windows looks or messes with low level system files, or they have a malware infestation they were unaware of/oblivious to. Most of the people who have problems with Apple updates seem to be the same way. They're running some truly bizarre programs that mess with the system in ways programs were not intended to mess with the system. There's generally a reason OS vendors provide an API for developers. You deviate from that at your own peril.

  • Is it worth buying the old Mac pro now, for iOS dev and designing?

    I want to replace my old Macbook Pro unibody 2008 late model, and buy something instead of that. Currently it has 8gb ram, an SSD drive, but it's getting slower and slower. I want to replace it with something, and if I don't have to I won't spend ~3000€ for a new machine.
    Would it make sense for me to buy an old Mac Pro (2008 - 2010 model, with at least 16gb ram, and SSD, and 2x27" monitor) and use that to create my iOS apps and design with Photoshop and Illustrator. I don't need a machine to do crazy stuff like 3D modelling (don't have time for it ) nor gaming.
    Thanks.

    The 2009 model and later are worth buying. They also feature Multi-Threading, which gives a performance boost.
    The 2008 model uses older FBDIMM memories, and its memory has been severely limited in size and expensive (unless you drop down one notch and use 667MHz, which has become quite affordable).
    The 2009 model and later change to processor-on-a-shelf, with either a one-chip  or a two-chip shelf installed. Each offers four memory slots per processor. 4 DIMMs @8GB would give you 32GB four under US$400.
    Four-core models would do what you are talking about, and you can upgrade to a 6-core processor if you are handy and can deal with thermal paste.

  • Is it worth fixing my old mac pro?

    I have a Mac pro Dual Core that I bought in around 2006
    I cant tell you what HD/Ram it has as I cant remember off the top of my head and dont have the machine with me as its at the apple store.
    Now I have never so much as had a niggle of a problem with it in all the years Ive had it and havnt even thought about a new machine as its been more than reliable and has suited my needs well.
    UNTILL two weeks ago my machine went into kernal panic, after trying everything I could I decided it was time to take my old trusty mac pro to the geniuses!
    Well they have now had it for a couple of weeks and have narrowed the issue down to the logic board and graphics card, that cost of repair is £650 inc VAT OUCH!!!
    Now Im in a right royal dilemna, it seems a lot of money to me to through at an old mac, however I am prepared to pay it out if its going to keep going for another few years. But Im thinking I might live to regret it if it goes wrong again!
    At the moment the cost of a new mac pro is out of reach so my options are to sell my macpro for parts and to buy a 6 month - a year old mac pro or do I get a new 27inch Imac instead?
    The last time I had an Imac (8 year +) it was not nearly good enough for the applications I was using and was way to slow. However I know they have  improved dramatically and look like a better spec than what im currently using anyway, so I was wondering if I should be considering this?
    I have a Macbook Pro 2.4 intel Duo core and Im quite happy with that and it handles my work without an issue, so on that basis I think an Imac would work.
    I use my computer for mainly web development but I do quite a bit of graphics work also for print. I mainly use photoshop, navicat, Fetch, dreamweaver and illustartor quite often needing them all open at once.
    So my options are:
    Repair my mac witch it the least expensive solution, but do I put £650 into an older machine?
    Sell it for parts and buy a 6 month - a year old mac pro
    Sell it for parts and buy a top spec Imac
    Please help, im not sure what the best option is

    The last time I had an Imac (8 year +) it was not nearly good enough for the applications I was using and was way to slow. However I know they have  improved dramatically and look like a better spec than what im currently using anyway, so I was wondering if I should be considering this?
    The current iMacs are much faster than your current machine.
    GeekBench Processor and Memory Performance:
    Mac Pro 2.0 GHz    4029
    Mac Pro 2.66 GHz  5202
    Mac Pro 3.0 GHz    5801
    iMac (2011) i7 3.4 GHz   11609
    iMac (2011) i5 3.1 GHz    8379
    MacBook Pro Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 2.4 GHz (2 cores)  3342
    I have a Macbook Pro 2.4 intel Duo core and Im quite happy with that and it handles my work without an issue, so on that basis I think an Imac would work.
    I think that you are correct.

  • Can I use old Mac Pro with new iMac?

    I have a Mac Pro (Pre 2007) running on 10.6.8 that is ok for now, but experiencing some degradation in performance. I have 4 drive bays full and memory maxed out. I am looking for a desktop solution that would allow the option to have the latest OSX (such as the latest iMac) and access this old Mac Pro still. Is this possible?
    If so, what are some of the caveats?
    SoftwareEx: CS6 is compatible with new OSX, but will files saved on new computer still be accessible on old computer?
    Access to files
    NetworkCurrently using older version of Airport Extreme for home office setup
    Any insights would be helpful! I hate the thought of this old workhorse turning into nothing more than an external hard drive, but it is not upgradable to the new operating system.

    It sounds like what you want to do is create a simple peer network so you can use the Mac Pro as a storage unit.
    This is easy to do, just connect the two with an ethernet cable and log on using the logon and password for the system you want to access. In the general case, this is a bad idea since you you have unrestricted access but you own both machines so security is a very low priority.
    Caveats:
         The OS version will determine what apps a machine can run.
         Data is just data as long as both systems use HSF+ or some other common file system.
         Airport may or may not work... but a hard wire will always get it done and transfers data a lot faster.
    You almost never get to have it ALL your way when mixing generations of systems, but if you keep it simple it works well. I've had a peer network with 4-6 systems running in my house since the turn of the century. Most Macs support 1000 baseT (gigabit ether) so data transfers up to 80-90MB/sec are easy.

  • Benchmarks for HD 2600 in old Mac Pro *post them here*

    I thought it would be a good idea to have a thread for all HD 2600 XT results from old mac pro's and even some from new mac pro's to see the difference. I got my HD 2600 XT for my original 2Ghz MacPro today, The box says u need a PCI-E 2.0 mac pro ( but we know u don't) and a 10.5.1 witch defiantly seems to contain the drivers for it from what I've read. Please post your results and see how they compare.
    Results:
    Cinebench 10: OpenGL on 7300GT = 2851 / 2600 = 4442
    Xbench:
    7300GT results:
    Results 121.18
    System Info
    Xbench Version 1.3
    System Version 10.5.1 (9B18)
    Physical RAM 7168 MB
    Model MacPro1,1
    Drive Type SAMSUNG HD321KJ
    CPU Test 114.34
    GCD Loop 235.46 12.41 Mops/sec
    Floating Point Basic 114.72 2.73 Gflop/sec
    vecLib FFT 91.08 3.00 Gflop/sec
    Floating Point Library 90.59 15.77 Mops/sec
    Thread Test 186.65
    Computation 181.48 3.68 Mops/sec, 4 threads
    Lock Contention 192.13 8.27 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
    Memory Test 142.08
    System 145.11
    Allocate 212.48 780.28 Kalloc/sec
    Fill 128.10 6228.60 MB/sec
    Copy 122.53 2530.89 MB/sec
    Stream 139.17
    Copy 137.43 2838.60 MB/sec
    Scale 136.06 2810.96 MB/sec
    Add 142.26 3030.48 MB/sec
    Triad 141.13 3019.07 MB/sec
    Quartz Graphics Test 180.82
    Line 140.51 9.36 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
    Rectangle 190.07 56.75 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
    Circle 153.09 12.48 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
    Bezier 154.21 3.89 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
    Text 443.06 27.72 Kchars/sec
    OpenGL Graphics Test 148.63
    Spinning Squares 148.63 188.55 frames/sec
    User Interface Test 284.51
    Elements 284.51 1.31 Krefresh/sec
    ATI 2600 results:
    CPU Test 115.22
    GCD Loop 235.64 12.42 Mops/sec
    Floating Point Basic 114.67 2.72 Gflop/sec
    vecLib FFT 91.81 3.03 Gflop/sec
    Floating Point Library 92.08 16.03 Mops/sec
    Thread Test 243.60
    Computation 331.37 6.71 Mops/sec, 4 threads
    Lock Contention 192.58 8.28 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
    Memory Test 134.37
    System 129.49
    Allocate 140.73 516.81 Kalloc/sec
    Fill 127.57 6202.89 MB/sec
    Copy 121.60 2511.53 MB/sec
    Stream 139.64
    Copy 137.73 2844.68 MB/sec
    Scale 137.36 2837.88 MB/sec
    Add 142.55 3036.65 MB/sec
    Triad 141.07 3017.89 MB/sec
    Quartz Graphics Test 153.32
    Line 120.86 8.05 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
    Rectangle 153.95 45.96 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
    Circle 121.37 9.89 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
    Bezier 133.61 3.37 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
    Text 471.96 29.52 Kchars/sec
    OpenGL Graphics Test 150.39
    Spinning Squares 150.39 190.78 frames/sec
    User Interface Test 217.74
    Elements 217.74 999.33 refresh/sec

    Just put my 2600 in my 2006 Mac Pro 2.66 , replacing X1900 which shows "the lines" every few days. The cards drive a 30 inch ACD and an old type 23inch. I tested the 1900 in Cinebench10 and XBench before removing it:
    CINEBENCH R10 for 2600
    Processor : Intel
    MHz : 2.66
    Number of CPUs : 4
    Operating System : OS X 32 BIT 10.5.1
    Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO OpenGL Engine
    Rendering (Single CPU): 2850 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 9011 CB-CPU
    Multiprocessor Speedup: 3.16
    Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 5331 CB-GFX
    CINEBENCH R10 for 1900
    Processor : Intel
    MHz : 2.66
    Number of CPUs : 4
    Operating System : OS X 32 BIT 10.5.1
    Graphics Card : ATI Radeon X1900 OpenGL Engine
    Rendering (Single CPU): 2851 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 8905 CB-CPU
    Multiprocessor Speedup: 3.12
    Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 5208 CB-GFX
    XBench 2600:
    Quartz Graphics Test 190.94
    Line 173.46 11.55 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
    Rectangle 225.53 67.33 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
    Circle 181.57 14.80 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
    Bezier 194.17 4.90 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
    Text 187.63 11.74 Kchars/sec
    OpenGL Graphics Test 195.41
    Spinning Squares 195.41 247.89 frames/sec
    User Interface Test 300.93
    Elements 300.93 1.38 Krefresh/sec
    XBench X1900:
    Quartz Graphics Test 206.60
    Line 184.90 12.31 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
    Rectangle 246.37 73.55 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
    Circle 204.28 16.65 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
    Bezier 197.50 4.98 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
    Text 209.40 13.10 Kchars/sec
    OpenGL Graphics Test 255.01
    Spinning Squares 255.01 323.49 frames/sec
    User Interface Test 272.05
    Elements 272.05 1.25 Krefresh/sec
    At first I was a bit surprised about the Cinebench results. But Barefeats actually shows the same thing for the "Imaginator" test of core image effects.
    Also surprised there is no power usage difference registered on my wattmeter. Thought it used 60 watts less.
    Mike

  • Upgrading? 3 year-old Mac Pro 3.1 with 8 GB RAM

    I have a 3-year old Mac Pro (model 3.1) with 8 GB RAM and 2 Quad Core Intel Xeon processors. The RAM consists of 8 x 1 GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
    Two questions:
    1) I need tp upgrade my RAM to 16 GB or more to run a new software (memory intensive application). I'm wondering if it's worthwhile to upgrade this system for ~$500 or just buy a new system with newer components. Also, whether the system can effectively use 16 GB of memory
    2) Recently my Mac Pro has been very slow and jittery e.g. when I switch between applications.  I've already tried things like cleaning up the hard drive / repairing disk permissions with little improvement. The only other thing I can think of doing is wiping the system clean and reinstalling everything. I'm wondering if anyone has had a similar experience, and if there is asomething to do to prevent this from happening in the future.
    Thanks!
    -H

    you can max out at 32GB
    An SSD can make a difference also
    Hang in for what/when/if the MacPro6,1
    Memory bandwidth OWC
    I would add 4 x 4GB to get to 20GB and see how that goes.
    Upgrade the hard drive: SSD or 10K WD VR 600GB or something.
    Off load your home media data and such to another drive, and go for a lean-mean OS/Apps only boot drive.
    Buyer's Guide: Hard Drives for Mac Pro
    How To clone

Maybe you are looking for