11g outer join with case statement - strange results.
Hello All,
I am experiencing a strange issues in 11g while using case statement.
I am not able to reproduce this using sample data. Not sure what is wrong.
I am not narrowing it to say the usage of case statemnt is giving wrong results, but that is my observation when I am doing trail and error testing.
Here are the details.
My Version
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
SQL> My Query
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT mf.schedule,
mf.cptcode,
NVL (mf.modifier, '00') modifier2,
CASE
WHEN mf.feetype = 'H'
AND mf.multiplier IS NOT NULL THEN
' 0.00'
WHEN (mf.feetype != 'H'
OR mf.feetype IS NULL)
AND mf.rbrvsvalue IS NOT NULL
AND mf.multiplier IS NOT NULL THEN
LPAD ( TRIM (TO_CHAR ( (mf.rbrvsvalue * mf.multiplier) / 100, 9999999.99)), 10)
ELSE
NULL
END
fee
FROM provider.mpifee mf, mpi_udffee.udffeeactivecptcodes vld
WHERE mf.schedule = 'SAPG1'
AND mf.cptcode = vld.cptcode
AND NVL (mf.modifier, 'NULL') = NVL (vld.modifier, 'NULL')) inline_fee,
(SELECT arc.schedule col1, arc.procedurecode col2, NVL (arc.modifier, '00') AS col3
FROM mpi_udffee.udffeeancfeedata arc
WHERE monthofextract = '201202'
AND arc.schedule = 'SAPG1'
AND TRUNC (SYSDATE - 10) BETWEEN arc.recordeffectivedate AND arc.recordterminationdate) inline_data
WHERE inline_fee.schedule = inline_data.col1(+)
AND inline_fee.cptcode = inline_data.col2(+)
AND inline_fee.modifier2 = inline_data.col3(+);
In the above query the inline view inline_data returns zero rows. but NVL is still getting applied for col3 and I am getting 00 in the results( strange ).
Results:
SCHEDULE CPTCO MODIFIER2 FEE COL1 COL2 COL3
SAPG1 49590 00 667.32 00
SAPG1 49611 00 781.03 00
SAPG1 49905 00 443.79 00
SAPG1 50205 00 883.56 00
SAPG1 50220 00 1315.15 00
SAPG1 50230 00 1638.74 00
SAPG1 50234 00 1666.16 00
SAPG1 50250 00 1566.14 00
SAPG1 50327 00 262.04 00
SAPG1 50541 00 1183.31 00
SAPG1 50620 00 1156.88 00
SAPG1 50650 00 1321.96 00
497 rows selected.
Just the inline view inline_data,
SQL> SELECT arc.schedule col1, arc.procedurecode col2, NVL (arc.modifier, '00') AS col3
2 FROM mpi_udffee.udffeeancfeedata arc
3 WHERE monthofextract = '201202'
4 AND arc.schedule = 'SAPG1'
5 AND TRUNC (SYSDATE - 10) BETWEEN arc.recordeffectivedate AND arc.recordterminationdate;
no rows selectedMuch unusual thing is when I just remove the case statement from the inline view "inline_fee", I am getting right results,
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT mf.schedule,
mf.cptcode,
NVL (mf.modifier, '00') modifier2 <-- Removed Case statement here
FROM provider.mpifee mf, mpi_udffee.udffeeactivecptcodes vld
WHERE mf.schedule = 'SAPG1'
AND mf.cptcode = vld.cptcode
AND NVL (mf.modifier, 'NULL') = NVL (vld.modifier, 'NULL')) inline_fee,
(SELECT arc.schedule col1, arc.procedurecode col2, NVL (arc.modifier, '00') AS col3
FROM mpi_udffee.udffeeancfeedata arc
WHERE monthofextract = '201202'
AND arc.schedule = 'SAPG1'
AND TRUNC (SYSDATE - 10) BETWEEN arc.recordeffectivedate AND arc.recordterminationdate) inline_data
WHERE inline_fee.schedule = inline_data.col1(+)
AND inline_fee.cptcode = inline_data.col2(+)
AND inline_fee.modifier2 = inline_data.col3(+);
SCHEDULE CPTCO MODIFIER2 COL1 COL2 COL3
SAPG1 46730 00
SAPG1 46735 00
SAPG1 46748 00
SAPG1 46760 00
SAPG1 46942 00
SAPG1 46945 00
SAPG1 47015 00
SAPG1 47125 00
SAPG1 47350 00
SAPG1 47505 00
SAPG1 47553 00interestingly explain plan for both the statements are exactly same,
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 138 Bytes: 1,078,274 Cardinality: 11,471
9 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 138 Bytes: 1,078,274 Cardinality: 11,471
2 PARTITION RANGE EMPTY Cost: 2 Bytes: 150 Cardinality: 3
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE MPI_UDFFEE.UDFFEEANCFEEDATA Cost: 2 Bytes: 150 Cardinality: 3
8 VIEW MPI_UDFFEE. Cost: 135 Bytes: 504,724 Cardinality: 11,471
7 HASH UNIQUE Cost: 135 Bytes: 539,137 Cardinality: 11,471
6 HASH JOIN Cost: 134 Bytes: 539,137 Cardinality: 11,471
3 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE MPI_UDFFEE.UDFFEEACTIVECPTCODES Cost: 13 Bytes: 177,345 Cardinality: 25,335
5 PARTITION LIST SINGLE Cost: 120 Bytes: 600,600 Cardinality: 15,015 Partition #: 8
4 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) REPRICE.PK_MPIFEE Cost: 120 Bytes: 600,600 Cardinality: 15,015 Partition #: 9 Partitions accessed #11Is there anything wrong with the query? If not have anyone come across this issue or posted it as a bug or is there a patch?
Update:
when I set the parameter "_complex_view_merging"=false I am getting the right results even with case statement. But I don want to do some thing unsupported.
Are there any other viable solutions?
I appreciate the help.
Thanks,
G.
Edited by: Ganesh Srivatsav on Apr 10, 2012 12:37 PM
Hi Tubby,
Right, the query transformation is going wrong. Following is from trace,
SELECT "INLINE_FEE"."SCHEDULE" "SCHEDULE",
"INLINE_FEE"."CPTCODE" "CPTCODE",
"INLINE_FEE"."MODIFIER2" "MODIFIER2",
"INLINE_FEE"."FEE" "FEE",
"ARC"."SCHEDULE" "COL1",
"ARC"."PROCEDURECODE" "COL2",
CASE
WHEN "ARC".ROWID IS NOT NULL THEN NVL ("ARC"."MODIFIER", '00')
ELSE NULL
END
"COL3"
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT "MF"."SCHEDULE" "SCHEDULE",
"MF"."CPTCODE" "CPTCODE",
NVL ("MF"."MODIFIER", :B2) "MODIFIER2",
CASE
WHEN ("MF"."FEETYPE" = :B3
AND "MF"."MULTIPLIER" IS NOT NULL) THEN
:B4
WHEN ( ("MF"."FEETYPE" <> :B5
OR "MF"."FEETYPE" IS NULL)
AND "MF"."RBRVSVALUE" IS NOT NULL
AND "MF"."MULTIPLIER" IS NOT NULL) THEN
LPAD ( TRIM (TO_CHAR ( "MF"."RBRVSVALUE" * "MF"."MULTIPLIER" / :B6, :B7)), :B8)
ELSE
NULL
END
"FEE"
FROM "PROVIDER"."MPIFEE" "MF", "MPI_UDFFEE"."UDFFEEACTIVECPTCODES" "VLD"
WHERE "MF"."SCHEDULE" = 'SAPG1'
AND "MF"."CPTCODE" = "VLD"."CPTCODE"
AND NVL ("MF"."MODIFIER", 'NULL') = NVL ("VLD"."MODIFIER", 'NULL')) "INLINE_FEE",
"MPI_UDFFEE"."UDFFEEANCFEEDATA" "ARC"
WHERE "INLINE_FEE"."SCHEDULE" = "ARC"."SCHEDULE"(+)
AND "INLINE_FEE"."CPTCODE" = "ARC"."PROCEDURECODE"(+)
AND "INLINE_FEE"."MODIFIER2" = CASE
WHEN ("ARC".ROWID(+) IS NOT NULL) THEN NVL ("ARC"."MODIFIER"(+), '00')
ELSE NULL
END
AND "ARC"."MONTHOFEXTRACT"(+) = '201202'
AND "ARC"."SCHEDULE"(+) = 'SAPG1'
AND TRUNC (SYSDATE-10) >= "ARC"."RECORDEFFECTIVEDATE"(+)
AND TRUNC (SYSDATE-10) <= "ARC"."RECORDTERMINATIONDATE"(+)Does this refer to a specific bug?
Thanks,
G.
Similar Messages
-
Query Question: Combine outer join with max() statement
Hi Folks,
I have been banging my head on this for a while now and am asking from some advice.
I have a Project Completion Report that pulls information from a number of tables:
1) Program (PK: ID)
2) Project (PK: ID, FK: Program_ID constrained to Program.ID)
3) Project_Monthly (PK: ID, FK: Project_ID constrained to Project.ID)
4) Status_Report (PK: ID, FK: Project_ID constrained to Project.ID)
The Status_Report table has a Record_Date field and holds a BLOB with the status reports for all the projects. In the best of all possible worlds, every project would have a status report, but, obviously, some have no status reports.
I have been asked to extend the Project Completion Report. It currently shows:
1) Program Number (Program.Program_Number)
2) Program Name (Program.Program_Name)
3) Project (Project.Project_Name)
4) Projected Completion Date (Project_Monthly.Current_Date_Production)
We would like to add the latest status report. So I started with something that works in another report, which is to get the ID from the Status_Report table for the record that has the maximum date value in the Record_date that matches the Project in the current Program. But this other query is looking at one program at a time. The Project Completion Report is showing all programs with projects that complete within a certain time frame.
The requirement is to show all projects that will complete within a time frame and to display the ID of the most recent status report (I use javascript to turn this into a downloadable link). However, whenever I try something like:
AND Status_Report.Record_Date =
(select MAX(Status_Report.record_date) from Status_Report
where Status_Report.ID = Project.ID)I loose all projects that have no status reports associated with them.
How can I keep all the projects that fulfill the criteria of completing within a specified time frame and add the ID, if it exists, of the most recent status report?
I thank you for your time and assistance. Please let me know how I can clarify the problem more clearly.
Yours,
PetieI had thought I finally solved it. Alas, it wasn't yet to be.
I created a view with the following select statement:
select p.program_number, p.program_name,
pj.id as pj_id, pj.project_name, pjm.in_prod_current, pjm.record_date as pjm_record_date,
prs.id as prs_ID, prs.record_date as prs_record_date
from program p, project pj, project_monthly pjm,
project_status_report prs
where p.id = pj.program_id
and pj.id = pjm.project_id
and pj.id = prs.project_id (+);Then, I selected from the view and the project_status_report table, performed an outer join on those (filtered to only the current month's project records) and filtered by the maximum date for each project.
Here is the resulting query:
select pc.program_number, pc.pj_id, pc.project_name, pc.in_prod_current,
pc.pjm_record_date, pc.prs_id
from project_completion pc,
project_status_report prs
where trunc(pjm_record_date, 'mon') = trunc(sysdate,'mon')
and prs.id = pc.prs_id (+)
and pc.prs_record_date =
(select max(mprs.record_date)
from project_status_report mprs
where mprs.project_id = pc.pj_id)However, I am still not getting the projects for which there are no status reports.
Verflixt und zugenaeht!
It seems that I want to compare based upon the record_date of the status report, but get the ID back. Can I use DECODE for that? Can I get the MAX(prs.record_date), but return only the prs.ID? Because if I include the ID in the select statement, I get too many matches, but if I don't then I don't have the ID, which is needed.
Any suggestions?
Thanks, Petie
Message was edited by:
Petie -
Case statement resulting into Left outer join with other tables
Hi All ,
I am facing a stuation where a Case statement on one of the logical columns in Answers is resulting into a left outer join with a table in the query.
If we remove the case stmt, the table is not being acessed.
The case stmt is a simple one and no other logical column is being accessed in the case stmt.
Please advice .
Thanks.Hi Sai,
No ..we dont have any left outer join ...its just that I am selecting measure from F1 which has a confimred dimension D1 with F2.Now when I dont have case stmt on measure from F1(Case stmt is something like : CASE WHEN "- P table"."P Column" = 'Y' THEN 'Right' ELSE 'Wrong' END), then it doesnt query F2.
However as soon as I introduce the case stmt ,the query creates a left outer join with F2.
Thanks. -
I have a very complicated query to construct that requires the use of 'AND', 'OR', and Outer Joins. Oracle's 9i documentation says you can't use an outer join with an 'OR'.
Can you suggest how I may return the correct records under the following conditions. There are 3 tables to join. Table A, Table B, and Table C. Tables A & B join with an = to common fields. The problem is with Table C.
The way the application was designed, it has to track a parent and child relationship. As such, the field to relate may exist in 1 of 2 fields. Let's see if I can draw it out for you.
Table A - Record 1
(ID = 1)
Table B - Record 1
(ID =1 [this relates to Table A.ID]
PID = 12345
CID = 67899
Site = A)
Table C - Record 1
(PID = 12345 [this relates to Table B.PID]
CID = 67899
Site = A)
Table C - Record 2
(PID = 67899 [This relates to Table B.CID]
CID = 12345
Site = A)
Now, I need to relate Table A to Table B where A.ID = B.ID AND
((B.PID = C.PID AND B.CID = C.CID)
OR
(B.CID = C.PID AND B.PID = C.CID))
AND
B.SITE = C.SITE
There may or may NOT be related records in Table C. That's the problem. This is where I need the outer join to get the all the records of the 1st two joins and only those that apply from the last join.
Your help will be greatly appreciated.I'd create two queries, a join from b to c in each of those manners and then UNION ALL the results together.
drop table junk_a;
create table junk_a (
id number );
drop table junk_b;
create table junk_b (
id number,
pid number,
cid number,
site varchar2(80) );
drop table junk_c;
create table junk_c (
pid number,
cid number,
site varchar2(80) );
insert into junk_a values (1);
insert into junk_b values (1, 12345, 67899, 'A');
insert into junk_c values (12345, 67899, 'A');
insert into junk_c values (67899, 12345, 'A');
commit;
SELECT b.*,
c.site AS site_c
FROM junk_b b,
junk_c c
WHERE c.pid(+) = b.pid
AND c.cid(+) = b.cid
UNION ALL
SELECT b.*,
c.site AS site_c
FROM junk_b b,
junk_c c
WHERE c.cid(+) = b.pid
AND c.pid(+) = b.cid;
SELECT a.id,
bc.pid,
bc.cid,
bc.site,
bc.site_c
FROM junk_a a,
SELECT b.*,
c.site AS site_c
FROM junk_b b,
junk_c c
WHERE c.pid(+) = b.pid
AND c.cid(+) = b.cid
UNION ALL
SELECT b.*,
c.site AS site_c
FROM junk_b b,
junk_c c
WHERE c.cid(+) = b.pid
AND c.pid(+) = b.cid
) bc
WHERE bc.id(+) = a.id; -
Outer join with effective date in peoplesoft query
Hi,
I'm trying to join two tables using outer join. Both tables are effective dated:
Dept_Tbl: dept_id, status, effdt
Tips_Tbl: dept_id, tips_id, effdt
Not all records in Dept_Tbl are in Tips_Tbl. I need to get all active depts and their most recent tips_id if they have one.
select a.dept_id, b.tips_id
from dept_tbl a, tips_tbl b
where a.status = 'Active'
and a.effdt =
(select max(a_ed.effdt) from dept_tbl a_ed
where a.dept_id = a_ed.dept_id
and a_ed.effdt <= SYSDATE)
and b.dept_id(+) = a.dept_id
and b.effdt =
(select max(b_ed.effdt) from tips_tbl b_ed
where b.dept_id = b_ed.dept_id
and b.tips_id = b_ed.tips_id
and b_ed.effdt <= SYSDATE)
The query only returns records that are in both tables.
Is there a way for outer join to work with effective dates?
Thanks in advance,
RegHere is an example of one solution. Note the use of NVL on both sides of the equal sign since both sides could be NULL in the case of the outer join
with dept_tbl as (select 1 dept_id, SYSDATE effdt FROM DUAL),
tips_tbl as (select 1 dept_id, NULL effdt FROM DUAL)
select a.effdt
from dept_tbl a,
tips_tbl b
where b.dept_id(+) = a.dept_id
and NVL(b.effdt, SYSDATE) = NVL((select max(b_ed.effdt)
from tips_tbl b_ed
where b.dept_id = b_ed.dept_id
and b_ed.effdt <= SYSDATE), SYSDATE);
EFFDT
5/7/2007 3:25:00 PM -
How to achieve an outer join with existsNode() function
I have a requirement to do an outer join with existsNode() function in my where clause. At present my where clause for join is like below
WHERE A.SOME_ID= “XYZ”
AND existsNode (B.SOMEXML_FEILD , …. ) = 1
AND existsNode (C.SOMEOTHERXML_FEILD , …. ) = 1
In this case if the existsNode fails on B or C, I still want data from A to be selected. How to rewrite this query to achieve that? I kinda want to achieve an outer joinHi,
is this what you are looking for:
SQL> with t as(select 1 id1,'A' name from dual union all
2 select 2 ,'B' name from dual union all
3 select 3,'C' from dual)
4 ,x as(select 1 id2,xmltype('<a>a</a>') xcol from dual union all
5 select 2 ,xmltype('<b>b</b>') xcol from dual)
6 select *
7 from t,x
8 where t.id1=x.id2(+)
9 and (existsNode(x.xcol,'/a')=1 or x.xcol is null);
ID1 N ID2 XCOL
1 A 1 <a>a</a>
3 C
SQL> spool off; -
Inner join Vs Outer join with ABAP code...?
Inner join Vs Outer join with ABAP code...?
Inner Join means, it will not select that recor at all, unless there is a matching entry in the second table.
suppose table VBAK INNER join table VBAP on VBAKVBELN = VBAPVBELN.
In this case, if there are no entries in VBAP, the header entry also will not show up.
But in case of OUTER JOIN, even if there is no items, it will show the header entry(VBAK) with blank columns for fields from item table.(VBAP)
here is one sample for inner join.
SELECT A~EBELN
A~EKORG
A~EKGRP
A~BSART
A~LPONR
A~LOEKZ
A~LIFNR
A~RESWK
B~AEDAT
B~WERKS
B~MATNR
B~MENGE
B~EBELP
B~ELIKZ
B~PLIFZ
B~PSTYP
B~KNTTP
B~MATKL
B~ZZD_PLANT
FROM EKKO AS A INNER JOIN EKPO AS B
ON
AEBELN = BEBELN
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE T_DATA
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_EKET
WHERE
A~EBELN EQ T_EKET-EBELN AND
A~BSART EQ C_UBSTO AND
A~EKORG IN S_EKORG AND
A~EKGRP IN S_EKGRP AND
A~BSTYP EQ C_BSTYP AND
A~LOEKZ EQ SPACE AND " Order not deleted
A~RESWK IN S_RESWK AND
B~EBELN EQ T_EKET-EBELN AND
B~EBELP EQ T_EKET-EBELP AND
B~WERKS IN S_WERKS AND
B~MATNR IN S_MATNR AND
B~MATKL IN S_MATKL AND
B~LOEKZ EQ SPACE. " Line item not deleted -
Problem with outer join with filter on join column
Hi,
In physical layer I have one dimension and two facts, and there's an outer join between the facts.
dim_DATE ,
fact_1 ,
fact_2
Joins:
dim_DATE inner join fact_1 on dim_DATE.DATE = fact_1.DATE
fact_1 left outer join fact_2 on fact_1.DATE = fact_2.DATE and fact_1.SOME_ID = fact_2.SOME_ID
When I run a report with a date as a filter, OBIEE executes "optimized" physical SQL:
select fact1.X, fact2.Y
from
Fact_1 left outer join on fact_1.DATE = fact_2.DATE and fact_1.SOME_ID = fact_2.SOME_ID
where Fact_1.DATE = TO_DATE('2009-05-28' , 'YYYY-MM-DD' )
and Fact_2.DATE = TO_DATE('2009-05-28' , 'YYYY-MM-DD')
The filter on Fact_2.DATE effectively replaces outer join with inner.
Is there a way to disable this "optimization", which is actually very good for inner joins, but doesn't allow outer joins?
Thanks in advance,
Alex
Edited by: AM_1 on Aug 11, 2009 8:20 AMIf you want to perform a Fact-based partitioning with OBIEE (two fact with the same dimension), you have to :
* create in your physical layer for each fact table the joins with the dimension
* create in the Business Model layer ONE star schema with ONE logical fact table containing the columns of your two physical fact table
In this way when you choose minimal one column of your fact1 and one column of your fact2, OBIEE will perform two query against each fact table/dimension, join them with an OUTER JOIN and your problem will disappear.
Cheers
Nico -
Outer Join with Where Clause in LTS
HI all,
I have a requirement like this in ANSI SQL:
select p1.product_id, p1.product_name, p2.product_group
from product p1 left outer join product_group p2 on p1.product_id = p2.product_id
and p2.product_group = 'NEW'
In Regular SQL:
select p1.product_id, p1.product_name, p2.product_group
from product p1, product_group p2
WHERE p1.product_id *= p2.product_id and p2.product_group = 'NEW'
In OBIEE, I am using a left outer join between these two in Logical table Source, and also, Gave
p2.product_group = 'NEW' in WHERE clause of LTS.
This doesn't seem to solve purpose.
Do you have any idea how to convert WHERE clause in physical query that OBIEE is generating to something like
product p1 left outer join product_group p2 on p1.product_id = p2.product_id AND p2.product_group = 'NEW'
I am using Version 10.1.3.4.1
Creating an Opaque view would be my last option though.Hello
I have read your post and the responses as well. and I understand that you have issues with the Outer Join with where Clause in LTS.
Try this solution which worked for me (using your example ) -
1. In the Physical Layer created a Complex join between PRODUCT and PRODUCT_GROUP tables and use this join relationship :
PRODUCT.PROD_ID = PRODUCT_GROUP.PROD_ID AND PRODUCT_GROUP.GROUP_NAME = 'MECHANICAL'
2. In the General Tab of PRODUCT table LTS add PRODUCT_GROUP table and select Join Type as Left Outer Join.
3. Check Consistency and make sure there are no errors .
when you run a request you should see the following query generated -
select distinct T26908.PROD_ID as c1,
T26908.PROD_NAME as c2,
T26912.GROUP_NAME as c3
from
PRODUCT T26908 left outer join PRODUCT_GROUP T26912 On T26908.PROD_ID = T26912.PROD_ID and T26912.GROUP_NAME = 'MECHANICAL'
order by c1, c2, c3
Hope this works for you. If it does please mark this response as 'Correct' .
Good Luck. -
Maximum number of tables that can be outer joined with one table in a query
Hi All,
Iam new to sql, so can you please let me know What is the maximum number of tables that can be outer joined with one table in a query?
Thanks,
Srinisrinu2 wrote:
Iam new to sql, so can you please let me know What is the maximum number of tables that can be outer joined with one table in a query?
There is no limit to the number of tables you can outer join as long as you join them correctly.
SQL> with a as
2 (
3 select 1 id, 2 b_key, 3 c_key from dual union all
4 select 2 id, 1 b_key, 4 c_key from dual union all
5 select 3 id, 3 b_key, 1 c_key from dual union all
6 select 4 id, 4 b_key, 2 c_key from dual
7 ),
8 b as
9 (
10 select 1 id, 1 c_key2 from dual union all
11 select 2 id, 5 c_key2 from dual union all
12 select 3 id, 3 c_key2 from dual union all
13 select 4 id, 2 c_key2 from dual
14 ),
15 c as
16 (
17 select 1 key1, 1 key2, '1-1' dta from dual union all
18 select 1 key1, 2 key2, '1-2' dta from dual union all
19 select 1 key1, 3 key2, '1-3' dta from dual union all
20 select 1 key1, 4 key2, '1-4' dta from dual union all
21 select 2 key1, 1 key2, '2-1' dta from dual union all
22 select 2 key1, 2 key2, '2-2' dta from dual union all
23 select 2 key1, 3 key2, '2-3' dta from dual union all
24 select 2 key1, 4 key2, '2-4' dta from dual union all
25 select 3 key1, 1 key2, '3-1' dta from dual union all
26 select 3 key1, 2 key2, '3-2' dta from dual union all
27 select 3 key1, 3 key2, '3-3' dta from dual union all
28 select 3 key1, 4 key2, '3-4' dta from dual union all
29 select 4 key1, 1 key2, '4-1' dta from dual union all
30 select 4 key1, 2 key2, '4-2' dta from dual union all
31 select 4 key1, 3 key2, '4-3' dta from dual union all
32 select 4 key1, 4 key2, '4-4' dta from dual
33 )
34 select d.a_id, d.b_id, c.key1 as c_key1, c.key2 as c_key3, c.dta
35 from
36 c,
37 (
38 select
39 a.id as a_id, b.id as b_id, a.c_key, b.c_key2
40 from a, b
41 where a.b_key = b.id
42 ) d
43 where d.c_key = c.key1 (+)
44 and d.c_key2 = c.key2 (+);
A_ID B_ID C_KEY1 C_KEY3 DTA
3 3 1 3 1-3
4 4 2 2 2-2
2 1 4 1 4-1
1 2
SQL> -
Outer join With a constant value
Hi all,
In one of query i have found out that the outer join with a constant value like
to_currency(+)='USD'
to_currency is a column name in a table.can any one please explain this outer join condtn.
Thanks in advance
SenthilHallo,
if you write var (+) = constant
var can be equal constant, and also can be null
Compare these 2 queries
select e.* from scott.emp e, scott.dept d
where e.deptno = d.deptno(+)
and d.deptno(+) = 10EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COMM DEPTNO
7369 SMITH CLERK 7902 17-Dez-1980 800 20
7499 ALLEN SALESMAN 7698 20-Feb-1981 1600 300 30
7521 WARD SALESMAN 7698 22-Feb-1981 1250 500 30
7566 JONES MANAGER 7839 2-Apr-1981 2975 20
7654 MARTIN SALESMAN 7698 28-Sep-1981 1250 1400 30
7698 BLAKE MANAGER 7839 1-Mai-1981 2850 30
7782 CLARK MANAGER 7839 9-Jun-1981 2450 10
7788 SCOTT ANALYST 7566 19-Apr-1987 3000 20
7839 KING PRESIDENT 17-Nov-1981 5000 10
7844 TURNER SALESMAN 7698 8-Sep-1981 1500 0 30
7876 ADAMS CLERK 7788 23-Mai-1987 1100 20
7900 JAMES CLERK 7698 3-Dez-1981 950 30
7902 FORD ANALYST 7566 3-Dez-1981 3000 20
7934 MILLER CLERK 7782 23-Jan-1982 1300 10
select e.* from scott.emp e, scott.dept d
where e.deptno = d.deptno(+)
and d.deptno = 10 EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COMM DEPTNO
7782 CLARK MANAGER 7839 9-Jun-1981 2450 10
7839 KING PRESIDENT 17-Nov-1981 5000 10
7934 MILLER CLERK 7782 23-Jan-1982 1300 10
As you can see, this (+) is very important
Regards
Dmytro -
I have written the below query, our requirement is, Some employees have "Transport Allowance" but not "Project Allowance". For this, I tried to use OUTER JOIN with this query. But this query takes long time and failed. The following query works fine if the employee has both "Transport Allowance" and "Project Allowance" (without outer join) Now, I also need to retrieve the employees who have "Transport Allowance" but not "Project Allowance". How can I retrieve it?
SELECT DISTINCT papf.employee_number
, peev.screen_entry_value Transport_Allowance
,peev1.screen_entry_value Project_Allowance
FROM apps.per_all_people_f papf
,apps.per_all_assignments_f paaf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf1
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf2
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef1
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef2
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev1
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev2
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf1
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf2
WHERE
papf.person_id = paaf.person_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef.assignment_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef1.assignment_id
AND paaf.business_group_id = papf.business_group_id
--Transport Allowance
AND peef.element_entry_id = peev.element_entry_id
AND petf.element_Name = 'Transport Allowance'
AND pivf.element_type_id =petf.element_type_id
AND pivf.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev.input_value_id= pivf.input_value_id
--Project Allowance
AND peef1.element_entry_id = peev1.element_entry_id
AND petf1.element_Name = "Project Allowance'
AND pivf1.element_type_id = petf1.element_type_id
AND pivf1.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev1.input_value_id = pivf1.input_value_id
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev.effective_start_date AND peev.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev1.effective_start_date AND peev1.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN papf.effective_start_date AND papf.effective_end_date)
ORDER BY papf.employee_number
Thanks in advance.I am using sames tables with alias to retrieve the columns values from the same table.
Here is my query.
SELECT DISTINCT papf.employee_number
, peev.screen_entry_value Transport_Allowance
,peev1.screen_entry_value Project_Allowance
FROM apps.per_all_people_f papf
,apps.per_all_assignments_f paaf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf1
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef1
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev1
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf1
WHERE
papf.person_id = paaf.person_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef.assignment_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef1.assignment_id
AND paaf.business_group_id = papf.business_group_id
--Transport Allowance
AND peef.element_entry_id = peev.element_entry_id
AND petf.element_Name = 'Transport Allowance'
AND pivf.element_type_id =petf.element_type_id
AND pivf.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev.input_value_id= pivf.input_value_id
--Project Allowance
AND peef1.element_entry_id = peev1.element_entry_id
AND petf1.element_Name = "Project Allowance'
AND pivf1.element_type_id = petf1.element_type_id
AND pivf1.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev1.input_value_id = pivf1.input_value_id
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev.effective_start_date AND peev.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev1.effective_start_date AND peev1.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN papf.effective_start_date AND papf.effective_end_date)
ORDER BY papf.employee_number
Thanks in advance. -
Outer join with BETWEEN clause
Hi All,
I have 2 tables (A and B) which i need to join. I need all records from table A and matching records from the table B. below is the structure.
TABLE A (total rows = 10)
ROW_WID
GL_DATE
LOCATION_CODE
TABLE B (total = 7)
ROW_WID
START_DATE
END_DATE
LOCATION_CODE
Initially, we were asked to join based on location_code. In the table B, some of the LOCATION_CODE are missing, which is present in table A.
We wrote below query
SELECT A.*, B.START_DATE, B.END_DATE
FROM A, B
WHERE A.LOCATION_CODE = B.LOCATION_CODE (+)
This gives 10 records, where 3 records have START_DATE and END_DATE NULL. because of outer join
It gave all records from the A table. It worked fine. Now i need to add one more condition where A.GL_DATE between B.START_DATE and B.END_DATE
If i write this
SELECT A.*, B.START_DATE, B.END_DATE
FROM A, B
WHERE A.LOCATION_CODE = B.LOCATION_CODE (+)
AND A.GL_DATE BETWEEN B.START_DATE and B.END_DATE
This gives me only 7 records. IS IT POSSIBLE TO ADD OUTER JOIN with BETWEEN clause.Hi All,
I'm in a similar situation,
I have a complex query, everything is working fine, except this part (I will simplify everything, removing other stuffs because I need help only on the following condition)
SELECT *
from transaction t, card c
where c.card_id = t.card_id (+)
and t.trn_date between to_date ('01/01/2012','dd/mm/yy') and ('01/01/2013,'dd/mm/yy')
How could i OUTER JOIN the between condition?
I tried with
and t.trn_date between to_date ('01/01/2012','dd/mm/yy') (+) and ('01/01/2013','dd/mm/yy') (+)
but returns a "missing expression" error.
Surely I'm missing some stupid thing about it, could you help me on this? (probably because I'm talking about parameters and I cannot put the outer join on a value)
How can I rewrite the condition in order to satisfy what I'm trying to accomplish?
Thanks in Advance,
Alex
Edited by: 981667 on 14-gen-2013 4.23
Edited by: 981667 on 14-gen-2013 4.24 -
Join columns of outer join with table have no uniqueness cons
Hi! I'm getting noizy error in alert log from time to time:
Join columns of outer join with table <table_name> have no uniqueness constraints
I've collected all the queries (v$sql, all_source) with montioned table, but non of them produces that error if executed.
Any hints how to reproduce this error or where else to search that buggy sql join?
Edited by: user545083 on 25.10.2010 6:21Hi
I think this error is output via an materialized view refresh - check for mviews against the given table which fulfil the issue given in the error text.
Thanks
Paul -
Using Presentation variables..along with case statements..
Hi All.
I have a issue using presentation variable along with CASE statements. My approach is
1) I have a dashboard prompt, which is being set as Presentation variable.
Based on the value selected in prompt, for ex the values of prompt can be 'ABC' and 'DEF'.
I have a calculated column, the calculation goes this way...
The forumal is
CASE WHEN @{Presentation Variable Name} = 'ABC' THEN xxxxxxxxxx ELSE IF @{Presentation Variable Name} = 'DEF' END. It gives error of "no table being referenced"..
Is this is the right approach??
Can i get the values of variable in a column formula, so that a column can have values selected in prompt?
Can anybody pls help me here..
Thanks in advance...Hi
Thanks for the quick response..
I agree to ur point..
But the requirement is
Based on the value of the prompt I need to switch the calculation in one of the formula area of one column..
If Prompt value is ABC then one kind of calculation in Fx and If the prompt value is DEF then one kind of calculation in the same Fx..
How can I acheive this?
Thanks in advance..
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi All, I have one customizated PG which is getting different parameter value from a seeded PG. Now in Seeded PG there is multiple line (multiple line requisition) with Qualtity & Price field. We have added one link for each line. This link is custom
-
What can I do--5 yr. MacBook Pro will not boot up?
What can I do get my MacBook Pro to boot up?
-
I have been having a problem with autofill and Safari that I have tracked to Keychain. If I enable autofill and press edit in the window of the prefs of safari then rather than getting all the websites that keychain has access to I get a swod and I h
-
Video File Sizes and Download Speed
Basic questions, I know, but I have looked and cannot find the answers anywhere else. How large is an HD video file? How long will it take on a connection that maxes out at 1.5 Mbps? How long, in genera,l do downloads take at faster connection speeds
-
We've had 4 Aironet AP 1131AG wireless access points working for sometime. Now, the users cannot get an IP address and get onto the network. The DHCP server is up and running just fine. The WAPs do not give out DHCP leases. The only thing that has re