64-bit xp in parallels

am I able to install the x64 edition of windows in parallels on my new imac c2d?has anyone tried this?

Hello,
The best answer I can give you at this time is you would have to try it and find out.
Basically, it is not directly supported.
Regarding the current 2.1 release, Parallels says this:
"Support for 64-bit primary and guest OSes is in scope for future versions of Parallels Workstation."
But, their Beta version that is in "Release Candidate" stage does support Windows Vista which implies that it MAY support 64-BIT Windows (although that does not mean specifically 64-BIT XP).
http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/update/
In the end, I would say that the safest answer is "no". But, if you already have 64-BIT Windows XP, then there's no harm in trying.
If you are considering purchasing 64-BIT Windows XP, save your money. Most Windows titles won't work in 64-BIT XP anyway. And, those that do have been reportedly unstable so far.
I say wait until things are more defined and the unknowns have been eliminated before you spend your money.
I hope this helps.
Let us know if you have other questions.
P.S., if you'd like, go ahead and click the "Helpful" or "Solved" buttons on any of the posts / replies above if you feel they were helpful or adequately answered your question.

Similar Messages

  • Bit twiddling on Parallel port

    Anybody got any idea of how to twiddle bits on the parallel port using
    Laview 6i and Windows NT?
    Thanks,
    Alf
    Email: [email protected]

    Thanks Dennis,
    I'm still looking. The link you sent applies to Win95 and Win98 which
    have built in Inport and Outport functions in LV. These are not available
    in NT. Any body achieved this functionality with LV6i & NT?
    Thanks
    Alf
    "Dennis Knutson" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > There's been several recent threads about the parallel port. A link to
    > one is
    >
    http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=5
    06500000008000000E11A0000&UCATEGORY_0=_49_%24_6_&UCATEGORY_S=0.
    > I'd suggest doing a search for "parallel port" or just browsing
    > through the recent history.

  • Running 32-bit windows via Parallel desktop in 64-bit Mac OSX?

    Hi all. I am thinking about running 32-bit version of windows XP in the Parallel Desktop 9, while the macbook itself runs 64-bit Mac OS X Mavericks. Please tell me what you think and what you know about this. Thank you in advance.

    You can run any operating system supported by Parallels in Parallels. Go to the Parallels site to see what operating systems are supported. I believe XP is supported. Whether your Mac is 64 bit or 32 bit has no bearing on what you want to do.

  • Running 32-bit and 64-bit firefox in parallel

    Since not all plugins are supported in 64-bit Firefox (using Minefield 4.0b13pre) it would be handy if we could run both browsers at the same time. Currently, when running 64-bit Minefield, starting 32-bit Firefox starts a new Minefield window.
    If it would start Firefox, I could run my flash sites in Firefox while doing my main surfing in Minefield. Currently I have no option but to run the flash in IE

    Make sure you have different profiles for each version of Firefox/Minefield. Create a shortcut to launch the correct profile for each version and add the -no-remote command line switch, I would only use this command line argument for the secondary version, and start the main version first without this command line argument.
    Some links that give more details:
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Creating_a_new_Firefox_profile_on_Windows
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Shortcut_to_a_specific_profile
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Opening_a_new_instance_of_your_Mozilla_application_with_another_profile

  • Pre-programmed sequence for data bits on parallel port.

    I've found and made a bunch of vis that allow for interactive high/low control of the 8 data bits on the parallel port. I want to control each pin with a pre-programmed pattern of bits. Any ideas?

    A U8 is an unsigned 8 bit number. To create one place a number control down on the front panel. Right-click on it and select Representation>>U8. To create an array of U8s you place an array control down, and then drag the above numeric into the array shell. You now have an array of U8s, which you can expand and place things in it.

  • Send bit to parallel port

    Hello LV community,
    I am sending bits to my parallel port to communicate with my ASIC but I have an issue to enter some test modes which require to send simultanously for example 3 bits at the same time into 3 pins  to the port, I can seen from the scope that there are some delays between them (aprox.20 us).
    My question is, this delays is it due to the PC performance or the way to send them? I am using the Out Port8.via for thi purpose. Is there any solution for this issue?
    Thx

    Hi,
    I don't really know your program but maybe you a better of with a Digital I/O board to avoid these delays. Most people use these boards to control there parallel port at high speed by directly accessing the pins. Don't forget that when you are using Port In and Port Out that you are still using software calls and you are dependant on PC performance.
    Regards.
    JorisV

  • I'd like to Pilot Parallel Port an its seperate bits

    Hi...
    I'd like to pilot 8 relays with the normal parallel-port of a PC using LabView. In this case I have to pilot 9 bits of the parallel port. How can I realise to pilot the parallel port and the seperate bits and which VI should be used?
    Message Edited by Sushi on 05-16-2006 11:05 AM
    Message Edited by Sushi on 05-16-2006 11:05 AM

    Hi Sushi,
    The first thing to investigate is whether the PC's parallel port can actually drive that many relays due to loading conditions.  Check out the specs of your PC's bus versus the loading requirements (typically mA) for a given relay. 
    As for controlling the relay using the parallel port, you can have a look at the example provided by Labview by searching within the Help menu, under "Find Examples", then search "parallel port".  Although reading & writing to the parallel port is relatively easy, the nice thing with the examples is that it provides information on each line of the port (data vs control, etc).  I also posted an attachment a few years ago on how to set up the port.  This was used to open / close relays..  I will look for the thread.
    Regards,
    JLV

  • Full 64-bit Aperture 3 Performance Maxed

    All Macs running Snow Leopard that are Core2Duo or better are capable of full 64-bit, but from reading the threads I would say almost nobody is doing this.
    Currently, of all Macs on the market now, only the X-Serve boots into full 64 bit mode by default.
    I guess that this is because Apple assumes a server is typically professionally managed, meaning the operator would have the technical savvy to verify that all required software is 64 bit clean....ALSO servers do not tend to have any excess software on them that is not needed for them to function.
    Stark contrast to the overstuffed user machines cluttered with useless old files PLUS there is still lot of current valid user software not 64-bit capable yet, like PS CS4. Knowing this, Apple does not want a lot of complaints from average, non IT professional users for current non-64 bit incompatibilities, and that is understandable. This makes Apple's default boot mode for Snow Leopard on user machines 32 bit mode. Currently Apple makes users DELIBERATELY select full 64 bit mode at boot...and in so assuming that these hopefully savvy users know the possible consequences.
    Now when running in the default 32 bit mode, 64 bit apps will operate in either 64 bit, or if so selected in their Info box, 32 bit to maximize compatibility. While running a 64 bit app increases its performance, it is only a portion of the performance running a full 64-bit machine will do.
    If your system has a lot of extensions or old drivers or other associated crapola <(technical term) left over from years of upgrades, you might just want to pass on this suggestion right now...HOWEVER if your system is decently clean, a fresh install of the OS and Aperture 3, you will most likely be fine.
    Aperture 3 running on a full 64-bit machine is a delightful improvement, and in my limited experience to date SMOKIN' fast.
    Now if you are on still on Leopard, congrats, you kept better performance than the early SL adopter folks on Aperture 2...BUT Aperture 3 NEEDS SL to make it sing, so if you are going to move to Aperture 3, UPGRADE to SL 10.6.2 NOW.
    Assuming we are all on SL 10.6.2 now let's talk full 64 bit, and getting all the performance your hardware can deliver.
    OK then...On this clean system, restart and hold both the 6 and 4 keys down during boot. You can then verify the full 64 bit mode by looking in the System Profiler. Select About this Mac... More Info... then click on the Software title header in the left column and in the second to last line you should see:
    " 64-bit Kernel and Extensions: Yes"
    WELCOME to your full 64 bit machine.
    After checking you are in full 64 bit, launch Aperture 3, and Activity Monitor...to monitor performance.
    If all goes well, Aperture should now be SMOKIN fast. I can hold the arrow key down in full screen and D3X .NEFs render almost immediately, smaller files a blink. 6GB on my MBP shows no pageouts running just Aperture 3. An 8 core Mac Pro with lots of RAM will be MUCH faster due to full 64 bit AND the parallel core thread processing.
    Imports with backups to a secondary disk (YAAY!!!) are so fast I cannot believe it, I think it is faster than Photo Mechanic, which is my gold standard for import/ingest speed.
    Now the two finger 6 and 4 key reboot method is only temporary, the next reboot it will revert to 32 bit mode, which is handy at this point in time if you have run into crashing or other problems.
    If you find you have a clean system you can make it boot into 64 bit all the time, but that is part of a larger performance discussion...just try this and see if you are doing better in terms of performance.
    Remember, most plug-ins, etc. are not going to be 64 bit yet...in fact Aperture even displays this in the File:Export... menu where it says (32 bit) next to the names of plug-ins. OBVIOUSLY (I hope) it probably would not be such a great idea to try these in this full 64-bit mode (ya think?). Just enjoy the stuff that does =).
    So...chances are VERY good you probably cannot do all your work in this mode just yet...BUT...if you are limiting tasks for the moment to just Aperture and the OS, like library conversion, or learning the new features, you probably will blow through this much faster than in 32 bit.
    ALSO, while I am talking Aperture performance...
    Aperture also needs really fast storage to see max performance with big libraries (500GB+), and I mean an eSATA host with a striped array. Firewire 800 and lesser technologies are 3-4 times slower on average. Sadly, Only the 17" MBP (and all previous size version MBPs) and the Mac Pro can run an eSATA host. To me this is the single biggest drawback to the iMac, and seems REALLY silly now that you can buy an iMac with an i7 processor with a great graphics card...but only the internal single drive is eSATA, and you are stuck with FW800 for storage.
    Anyway, I am running a Sonnet Tempo Pro Express 34 card in my MBP connected to Sonnet Fusion D500P array with 10TB of disk space, formatted using SoftRAID. My dedicated space for Aperture benchmarks on this setup at about 130MB/sec on average of all tests. Two crucial facts here is that the Sonnet drivers for the card (v2.2.1) are full 64-bit as well as the fact that a 64 bit version of the SoftRAID driver is included with Snow Leopard for users in 64 bit mode, which will allow you to keep existing volumes and access data from the 64 bit version of Snow Leopard.
    Anyway, fellow Aperture 3 adopters I encourage you to give it a shot...and I hope this results in some smiling faces...
    Sincerely,
    K.J. Doyle
    PS No flames please... of course since this is all new ground YMMV... proceed at your own risk, there is a reason Apple is not making this easy right now...'nuff said, I hope.

    Kevin -- is it your understanding that Aperture can and will default to 64 bit performance without need to reboot 6-4?
    Hi Miguel,
    He is correct, Aperture will be running in 64 bit, but the rest of the machine will not, and Aperture is dependent on many other subsystems, storage being #1 given the huge size of libraries. As I said above, I am pretty sure Apple would not recommend you run full 64 because of the other incompatibilities that exist on the machine, it would cause too many complaints from those who do not understand the need for 64 bit clean operation, and that all apps are not there yet.
    HOWEVER, there is a lot more to this than just Aperture's operation, as it is an app that uses many resources.
    There is a very significant difference in operating my eSATA array with 64 bit drivers and a full 64 bit machine, and therefore Aperture runs much faster than it would using the 32 bit drivers for the storage.
    There are other issues as well with greatly improved OS memory operations and other technical issues that impact this as well. The more RAM you have the bigger the improvement. This impacts parallel processing of threads, and again gives more time to Aperture in the bargain.
    Sincerely,
    K.J. Doyle

  • Oracle Tunning in 10g on table parallelism

    Hi,
    I am working in 10g database(10.2.0.1). I have insert statement which uses table A(120 M rows), B(0.5M rows) and C (0.2M rows) to insert on table D.
    Following are the table definitions:
    Table A - Is partitioned, has unique indexe and is declared NOPARALLEL DEGREE.
    Table B - Has unique indexe and is declared NOPARALLEL DEGREE.
    Table C - Has unique indexe and is declared NOPARALLEL DEGREE.
    Table D - Has declared NOPARALLEL DEGREE.
    a) When using the insert on table D using tables A,B and C using HINT /*+ APPEND PARALLEL(table name 12) / and also given on Inset table with /+ APPEND PARALLEL(table name 12). For most of the time it shows 17 to 21 sessions.
    INSERT INTO /*+ APPEND PARALLEL(d 12)*/ D d
    (x,y,z)
    SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(A 12) PARALLEL(B 12) PARALLEL(C 12)*/
    bla. bla...bla...
    with few joins on the respective tables
    b) Same query without any changes at table level definition and no query changes. Some time it shows only one session. At that particular time we (user) has to intervene and alter table definition from NOPARALLEL to PARALLEL (DEGREE DEFAULT) on target table D.
    My questions are:
    i) What could be reason that it varies and displays no of sessions are running ?
    ii) How oracle takes and uses no of sessions while executing the query?
    iii) Is there any where we can see or monitor the session tracking ?
    iv) How many max sessions can a query like above insert can take/use for the user schema?
    v) Is it possible for the developers to reduce and increase the sessions while executing the query ?
    vi) On what basis the sessions get increase or decrease?
    If any of them can provide answers to above query it will be helpful...
    Regards,
    Prakash C

    The following link might help u a bit in understanding parallelism concept for queries -
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14223/usingpe.htm

  • Why does this loop used to write values to the parallel port keep going forever?

    Have a look at this VI guys. I'm trying to send a sequence of bits (used to trigger an IC). I'm interested in the last bit of the data port (D0). so I'm sending either 0 or 1 to that pin to trigger the IC. it works, but the problem is that the loop keeps going forever and i cant control it. if i send 3 to the loop count, I'm expecting to get: 1 0 1 0 1 0, but it doesnt stop and keeps going forever.
    It seems that the problem is not with the loop. because i deleted the loop and just left the flat sequence so that it executes only once, but still it keeps repeating. How can i make the flat sequence execute only once?
    I'm using a parallel port monitor (parmon.exe) and a LED connected to D0 of the parallel port to check.
    If anybody has an alternative or better method to send the bits to the parallel port, I'd be very thankful.Message Edited by krayzie on 05-14-2005 04:33 PM
    Attachments:
    pport.vi ‏24 KB

    It works just fine here. Place an indicator to the iteration terminal [i] to watch how things progress. Do the number ever increase above N-1 to what you wire to N? I don't think so!
    Also make sure you don't run the VI with the "Continuous run" button. In this case the VI would immediately restart whenever it is finished. use the "Run" button.
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Parallel Port Programming

    After series of trials and searching the forum i was able to get the commapi and install it. i want to design a simple program that can control circuits (i.e to on leds) . the problem is how to write a 1 or 0 bit to a particular pin. i saw different posts on this issue but still haven't got the real solution.
    i also got to know about parport api and have downloaded and istalled it. but when i run the SimpleIO.java that comes with the package i get this error:
    An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
    Unexpected Signal : EXCEPTION_PRIV_INSTRUCTION occurred at PC=0x10001057
    Function=[Unknown.]
    Library=C:\Program Files\Java\j2re1.4.1_02\bin\parport.dll
    NOTE: We are unable to locate the function name symbol for the error
    just occurred. Please refer to release documentation for possible
    reason and solutions.
    Current Java thread:
    at parport.ParallelPort.readOneByte(Native Method)
    at parport.ParallelPort.read(ParallelPort.java:37)
    at SimpleIO.main(SimpleIO.java:8)
    plz i want to know what's the cause of this problem, really can't go further on my own and i know nothing on native interface.
    I would be grateful if i can achieve my objective without the parport also.
    How can i write bits to the parallel port plz???????????????
    Thanx in advance

    Why not communicate with the parallel port using the COMM API 2.0?

  • Is it possible to control the parallel port with Lookout 5.0

    I want a simple demo setup on a PC, so I can control the 8 data bits of the parallel port. Example, to use START p/b that would toggle bit 0 and data returned on bit 1.

    It is possible to send bytes to the parallel port using the ASCII object within Lookout. However, it is presently not possible to control the state of the individual bits on the parallel port with Lookout.
    If you need to control the individual bits on a parallel port, consider using LabVIEW. It is much more powerful when programming serial and parallel ports.

  • Using Parallel Port with Outport.vi Problem

    Hello,
    I am trying to use my parallel port to control a relay network and have run into a problem. I am using the outport instead of visa because for some reason I get an error with visa and outport seems more simple. The problem I am having is that my program doesn't seem to be able to initially take control of the port. What I mean by this is that if I restart the computer and open/run my program, I get an incorrect output on the parallel port. However, if I run one of the example programs for controlling the paralle port using outport (attached) (I believe the one I use is called Reading and writing to parallel port using loops) I am able to control the output to the parallel port. Also, after the example has run, my program works correctly. However, if I restart my computer again and run my program first it can no longer control the port correctly. So the problem seems to be that my program isn't initializing the port correctly or assessing it right at the beginning of the program. However, looking at the example program I don't really see what they are doing that I am not. I have the correct port address. 
    My program takes values from a text file and displays them on the port and that works correctly. 
    Attachments:
    CircuitTopModule.vi ‏26 KB
    parallel port examples.llb ‏72 KB

    Hi Jag213, I'm glad you were able to resolve the issues you discussed on the other forum related to this issue.
    Now that you have it working, I would recommend a few things:
    1. Just try modifying one of the existing examples and see what you can get away with removing in order to keep it working the first time.
    2. Try modifying the timing on your example - 10 seconds is a long time to wait between each week, I wonder if you are getting a time out? Do the examples work when you insert that kind of timing delay?
    3. Add the In Port.vi into your code - this may be related to getting your Out Port.vi to work correctly.
    4. Your code controls 8-bits on the parallel port, while the examples control 32-bits. Do all 32 bits need to be initalized? Looking at the Parellel Port Read and Write Loop.vi Example, in the IO Connector Status, the 31st bit controls whether the target is initialized.
    Play with these settings and see if you can get yours to work the first. If all else fails, build your program to run off of one of the examples. For example, have the while loop run once, and then call yours as a SubVI.
    Good luck!
    Joey S.
    Software Product Manager
    National Instruments

  • PC parallel port access with XP

    I recently got In Port and Out Port working on XP.
    I searched the ni site for AccessHW. The CVI Run Time Engine has to be
    version 5.510 or earlier. I checked the version number of one file, i.e.
    cvirte.dll to verify.
    I directed the installer to install accesshw to the directory where the new
    In Port and Out Port and the rest of the new parallel port .vis were going
    to be, i.e. Labview\Labview 6\vi.lib\platform.
    I downloaded parallel.zip from ni.com and moved the parallelnt.llb file to
    this same directory. Parallelnt.llb has a number of parallel port vis, not
    just replacements for In Port and Out Port. I replaced the In Port.vi and
    Out Port.vis in the diagrams I was trying to make work with the new .vis.
    So, on this XP machine, with
    a monitor program, parmon.exe, running to
    display the bits on the parallel port, Labview can be seen to be using the
    new parallel port .vis, and, bits on the port are changing.

    I wonder if there's a reason why there's a javax.comm 3 series for *nix, but not for windows. Hmmm.                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Format of the parallel port base address

    Just wondering if someone could please help with what I'm sure is a simple question
    I'm currently trying the control the first 3 bits of the parallel port using the Out Port sub vi.
    Using the Labview examples and help I can see how to find the base address of the port. My LPT1 port is 378 like most.
    However the parallel port I'm trying to control is a added in extra PCI card and looking in the Device Manager this is LPT3 with 2 an address ranges starting at CF00 and CE00 . I understand how the address range of starting at 0378 becomes 378 for the base address. But whatabout CF00 asnd 2 ranges? What do I need to put as the base address for the Out Port for CF00?
    thanks in advance
    Nick

    duplicate post. why did you feel the need to repeat the question, especially since it has already been answered.

Maybe you are looking for