802.1x and WOL issues

OK here is the deal. We use 802.1x with ACS as the Radius server. We also use WOL to wake computers for patching and remote use. We cannot get rid of WOL or 802.1x. We also cannot have ports assigned to our Data VLAN since that would, in the eyes of the auditors, allow unauthorized devices on the VLAN. We use a "Sleep" VLAN and then use ACS policies to assign the authenticated device to the proper VLAN. We also have VOIP with the computers connected to them. Here is the actual issue we are having. It seems that on some switches even with sleeping computers the "Sleep" VLAN is down/down or up/down. If there is at least one computer that is asleep and not behind a phone everything works fine. It looks like an issue with the phone and enhanced CDP. We are looking for a way to have the "Sleep" VLAN always up/up even without devices connected. We have been tossing around ideas like having a loop so that STP runs for that VLAN, connecting a layer 3 interface to a layer 2 interface on the same switch, even connecting a phone on every access switch and placing it in the "Sleep" VLAN. We are looking for better ideas.
Thanks.                

Hello,
I suspect your problem is the fact that you're using self-signed certificates, but you haven't installed and trusted the root cert that issued them. The reason the phone can't validate the certificate is because it doesn't trust the issuer (or you don't have all of the certificates in the chain if you have intermediate CAs). That's also the problem with your Mac client forcing you to hit 'Accept' each time you authenticate - it doesn't trust the root CA. You should be able to talk to your IT folks to get a copy of it to import and trust (the certificate itself isn't secret).
1. Once you have the certificate, import it into your Mac's keychain and set the appropriate trust settings.
2. You should use the iPhone Configuration utility to create a profile to install the certificates onto the phone. On the Credentials tab hit '+' and browse to the location of the root certificate you got from IT. Once it's part of the profile you can then setup the Wi-Fi settings as needed.
This can get tricky, depending on the configuration your IT staff has in place. They should be amenable to providing you the same information they'd provide a Windows client (hopefully). Do you know what kind of EAP type you're using on your network? From the log the client is negotiating PEAP, which I assume is correct.
You'll need to get the certs ironed out before this will work reliably.

Similar Messages

  • Airport 802.11g and WIFI issues with Apple bluetooth keyboard

    Hey guys, this thing start to drive me crazy, I bought a Apple BT keyboard but just recently I started to having problems with my wifi connection and apparently I think this is due to the BT keys.
    I started to notice this issue when I moving with the laptop in another room where usually I had maximum Airport signal, now it's happening that the signal start to lose power and when is just to the minimum, internet or other net staff don't work anymore and after 5 minutes of this apparently "freeze" wifi status, the airport loose definitely the signal.
    After that I need to turn off the Airport card, most of the time work but sometimes i need to turn off two times to get it works.
    After I read different blogs and forum, I tried to change channel, use the interference robustness, anything, and at the ending I reinstalled Leo, still have this problem, so I started to turn off the bluetooth connection and it look's like when the signal start to lose power the network keep working, and than reprise the maximum power.
    So I can really fix this issue or is another "well done" by Apple? It look's like the Apple industry getting so close to the trash world! I'm sorry for these last words but my disappointed in Apple getting bigger.
    Thank you for anyone helps.
    P.S. a friend of mine with a Macbook Pro, Snow Leopard and my same Airport Base station have the same issue.

    GuyI just fixed for now the problem turning off the bluetooth keyboard when I have wifi issues, it's the only solutions!

  • 802.1X and Wake on LAN

    Hi,
    I have applied 802.1x on Cat4500 and cat 3750 and i need to use Wake on LAn to load software on my Pc's.
    I what i have to config?
    Thanks

    Hi!
    Is Cisco working to implement this feature also in smaller IOS switches like 2950 etc.in the future?
    We want to use 802.1X and WOL together in this devices.So far it seems to be not possible.
    nice feature, i will hope the best.
    thanks
    michael

  • Cisco Systems vs "CSIRO" 802.11a and 802.11g infringed upon the '069 patent

    Hi,
    any news about Cisco Systems and the "CSIRO" 802.11a and 802.11g infringed upon the '069 patent ?
    http://www.buffalotech.com/products/wireless/
    Dear Customer
    As you may be aware, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation ("CSIRO") sued Buffalo, Inc. and Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc. ("Buffalo"), for alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 5,487,069 ("the '069 patent"). Subsequently, CSIRO also asserted its patent against the entire wireless LAN industry, including, Microsoft, Intel, Accton, SMC and Netgear.
    In it's lawsuit against Buffalo, CSIRO claimed certain Buffalo wireless networking products compliant with IEEE standards 802.11a and 802.11g infringed upon the '069 patent. Buffalo believed at that time and continues to believe that there are no grounds for CSIRO's allegations of infringement. The United States district court, however, found Buffalo to infringe the '069 patent and enjoined the importation and sale of Buffalo's IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g compliant products.
    CSIRO's lawsuits are against the entire wireless LAN industry and could affect the supply of wireless LAN products by any manufacturer, not just Buffalo. The entire industry is resisting CSIRO's attempts to enjoin the sale of wireless LAN products. Recently, Microsoft, 3COM Corporation, SMC Networks, Accton Technology Corporation, Intel, Atheros Communications, Belkin International, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Nortel Networks, Nvidia Corporation, Oracle Corporation, SAP AG, Yahoo, Nokia, and the Consumer Electronics Association filed briefs in support of Buffalo's position that injunctive relief is inappropriate in this case.
    During the period of time that the injunction is in effect (10/1/2007), Buffalo cannot offer for sale, sell, import, or use its IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g compliant products in the United States. A list of the products covered by the injunction is attached here . The injunction does not prohibit sales of pre-existing inventories of products by Buffalo's customers. In addition, Buffalo has secured CSIRO's agreement to permit the replacement of defective products under warranty. None of Buffalo's other products are currently affected by this injunction.
    While Buffalo believes that it will be successful in reversing the district court's decision and will obtain a stay of the injunction pending a decision on the merits, the Court of Appeals has not yet issued a decision. Should the Court of Appeals issue a decision staying the injunction, you will be promptly notified. After the stay is issued or a favorable decision on the merits is obtained, Buffalo will be able to resume the supply of IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g products
    Please rest assured that Buffalo continues to stand behind their products and will continue to support all of our loyal customers as it relates to product warranties, technical support and the like without interruption.

    I suspect after reading the patent and the litigation that you mentioned above, that the US District Court decision will be reversed as the patent appears to be very vague in its contsruction and verbage. Furthermore, the intent to hold the IEEE hostage on the ratification of 802.11n will not bode well in the court's eyes. If in fact the case is reversed, I believe that the members of CSIRO will be in danger of lost profits litigation from Buffalo. Stay tuned to this bat channel.

  • MAB/802.1x and Alkatel IP Phones

    Hi All
    We have a distributed deployment where Alkatel ip-touch phones are authentictaed via MAB. Alkatel ip touch phones has 802.1x enabled by default and the phone tries eapol first and then switch authenticates via MAB which is fine. Once authenticated its working as expected. The issue is the phone keeps on periodic retry after x amount of minutes for 802.1x again which triggers the phone to reboot again and goes via the whole process. This interupts the voice. We could disable 802.1x but its per phone basis. Has anyone came across this issue and found a way to diable globally via the call manager etcc. or any workarounf from ISE/switch side?
    Thanks
    G

    Hi Tarik,
    Thanks for the reply, please find below the switch  port config lines, its a 370x switch, IPbase  and universalon 15.2-1.E1 image
    Note- Since the 8021x is enabled by default the phone initially tries 802.1x and after failing , the switch  goes to the next auth method which is MAB which is successful. The issue is the phone again initiales a 802.1x packet after some time and the whole process starts again and because 8021x is failed the phone reboots again. I think this is the way this type of phone work and we cannot do much unless disable 802.1x or install the Alkatel CA certs in the ISE cert store?
    Interface gi x/y
    switchport access vlan xx
     switchport mode access
     switchport voice vlan yy
     ip access-group ACL_ALLOW in
     authentication event fail action next-method
     authentication event server dead action reinitialize vlan xx
     authentication event server dead action authorize voice
     authentication host-mode multi-auth
     authentication open
     authentication order mab dot1x
     authentication priority dot1x mab
     authentication port-control auto
     authentication timer reauthenticate server
     authentication violation restrict
     mab
     snmp trap mac-notification change added
     snmp trap mac-notification change removed
     dot1x pae authenticator
     dot1x timeout tx-period 10
     spanning-tree portfast

  • Potential Security Hole with 802.1x and Voice VLANs?

    I have been looking at 802.1x and Voice VLANs and I can see what I think is a bit of a security hole.
    If a user has no authentication details to gain access via 802.1x - i.e. they have not been given a User ID or the PC doesn't have a certificate etc. If they attach a PC to a switchport that is configured with a Voice VLAN (or disconnect an IP Phone and plug the PC direct into the switchport) they can easily see via packet sniffing the CDP packets that will contain the Voice VLAN ID. They can then easily create a Tagged Virtual NIC (via the NIC utilities or driver etc) with the Voice VLAN 802.1q Tag. Assuming DHCP is enabled for the Voice VLAN they will get assigned an IP address and have access to the IP network. I appreciate the VLAN can be locked down at the Layer-3 level with ACL's so any 'non-voice related' traffic is blocked but in this scenario the user has sucessfully bypassed 802.1x authentication and gain access to the network?
    Has anyone done any research into this potential security hole?
    Thanks
    Andy

    Thanks for the reply. To be honest we would normally deploy some or all of the measures you list but these don't around the issue of being able to easily bypass having to authenticate via 802.1x.
    As I said I think this is a hole but don't see any solutions at the moment except 802.1x on the IP Phone, although at the moment you can't do this with Voice VLANs?
    Andy

  • WRT55AG - Denial Of Service / security hole, and other issues

    Im using a V2 of the WRT55AG using 1.79 firmware.
    I suffered many perplexing issues when connected directly to my cable modem.
    1 It would lock up and no data transversed it
    2 Its web interface would no longer exist
    3 Some types of data would be blocked
    4 It would stop doing DHCP
    5 Ping times to it from the LAN side would increase in 1 minute intervals for hours or until power cycled
    6 Data rates would slow randomly.
    These problems would occur separately and in combinations. They would occur randomly but some issues would occur daily.
    Left alone the router would 100% lock up in a matter of days. This occurred 100% of the time.
    Rebooting was a daily and sometimes hourly ritual.
    After reading in many forums of the known issues with this router I purchased a BEFSR41 as replacement.
    ALL of my problem were gone. This of course isolated the issues I was having to the WRT55AG.
    I then hooked up the WRT55AG _after_ the BEFSR41.
    The problems with the WRT55AG disappeared. Completely. It suddenly worked for weeks perfectly.
    I then tried setting the BEFSR41's DMZ to the IP of the WRT55AG exposing the WRT55AG to the net directly.
    The issues returned.
    So the WRT55AG is crashing and suffering from various problems because of some hostile internet packets. Effectively it suffers major security issues and a denial of service from something that is present from the internet. I did not isolate what ports+packets were causing the DOS condition.
    Im sure the WRT55AG has some code that is vulnerable to attack because it crashes when exposed to the net. This is a serious issue.
    This is a sad state of affairs. I paid good money for the router. Its too late to get my money back. I would settle for a 802.11A WAP.
    I want a *FIX* for the obvious security hole that could expose anyone on the LAN side of the wrt55AG router to attack if the router/firewall is compromised. I want my WRT55AG to work as intended or at least as well as the BEFSR41 I own.
    I also feel if the source code was still open, then these problems would not exist. At the very least, some other 3rd party version of firmware would be available that would work in the router and any issue would get prompt attention and a quick solution from a open source team. The decision by Linksys to move away from open source firmware will erode the quality of the brand by making products less reliable.
    WHEN will a new version of the firmware be available for the WRT55AG ?
    If not how do I go about returning a well documented defectively engineered product for a product that works ?

    I would like to see a update to fix the various issues with this router. When will this be available ?
    -OR-
    If this product is considered End Of Life, I would like to get confirmation that no future firmware update will occur.
    As this product was defective out of the box and has never been fixed, I would like a replacement product please. My serial number is # MDJ106802225
    Message Edited by Xymox on 08-13-2008 11:28 AM

  • 802.1x and the iPhone

    So I don't think this is possible right now to connect to an 802.1x network from the iPhone. I am posting for 2 reasons.
    1. Anybody figure out a way to do this?
    or if not...
    2. Apple, we really need this in a software update...

    802.1X [upper case X] is a network access mechanism or authentication protocol used with 802.11x [lower case x] wireless networking standards, such as…
    • 802.11a
    • 802.11b
    • 802.11g
    • 802.11n
    …and so on. It has been natively supportive in Mac OS X for Macintosh desktop and portable platforms since the release of OS X 10.3, but is not visible typically unless you launch the Internet Connect application to add and configure it.
    A general discussion of 802.1X can be found in this Wikipedia article.
    The oft confused 802.11x is nothing more than a generic representation of the group of wireless networking standards listed above.
    This really is a very substantial issue for many academic and business users, as access to their networks is typically controlled by an upstream Radius server and without support for configuring an 802.1X interface, they cannot connect their networks as recognized, authorized users.

  • Airport Express 802.11g Airplay Connection Issues

    My dad has had an AirPort Express 802.11g hooked up to his stereo for a couple of years now. Uses it only to stream music. Our WiFi network is run by an older AirPort Extreme 802.11n (2nd Generation). Express firmware is at 6.3, as high as it can go for the g models.
    2 months ago, I got my dad an iPhone 5 running iOS 6, and upgraded his MacBook to run OS X 10.7 Lion so he could sync and use iCloud and all that stuff. From that moment forward, connections to the AirPort Express are awful or nonexistent for most devices. Many times after you tell iTunes or the Music app to connect to it, when you hit play nothing will happen. Sometimes the progress bar will move, but no sound will play. Other times the sound will start, go for ~5 seconds, and then cut out. No issues with staying on the WiFi network.
    Devices AirPlay DOES NOT work properly with:
    - Dad's MacBook (final-gen plastic model) running OS X 10.7
    - Dad's iPhone 5 (iOS 6)
    - My iPhone 4S (iOS 6)
    Devices AirPlay DOES work with:
    - Dad's older iMac running OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard
    - My MacBook Air running OS X 10.8.4 Mountain Lion
    None of his music is on the iMac, and the concept of doing a VNC to make it work would be far out of his level of understanding.
    Is this a case of me just needing to get him a new AirPort Express for full compatibility, or is there another workaround? Eventually I'm going to get him off of his MacBook and up to something more currently, like my Air in September when I upgrade.
    This is practically the only thing my dad uses his computer for, so any help I can receive to get this working would be MUCH appreciated.

    Hello niclake,
    I found an article for you that would be a good place to start troubleshooting Airplay on the AppleTV.
    Troubleshooting AirPlay and AirPlay Mirroring
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts4215
    Troubleshooting performance issues with AirPlay or AirPlay Mirroring
    If you are experiencing intermittent playback or significant network lag with AirPlay or AirPlay Mirroring, it could be due to a weak Wi-Fi connection, interference, or the distance between the Wi-Fi router and your iOS device, Apple TV or AirPort Express. Try the following suggestions:
    Ensure that other devices are not trying to stream to the same Apple TV at the same time.
    Turn off Bluetooth on your iOS device by tapping Settings > General > Bluetooth.
    Ensure that your Wi-Fi router is set up with the recommended settings for the best performance.
    Certain external devices, such as microwave ovens and baby monitors, may interfere with a Wi-Fi network. Try moving or disabling these devices.
    If possible, try to locate your Wi-Fi router in the same room as your Apple TV and iPhone/iPad.
    If your wireless and wired networks are the same, try connecting your Apple TV to the router via Ethernet instead of Wi-Fi.
    If the Wi-Fi router has an external antenna, check to see that is it connected properly and in good condition.
    Use the Wi-Fi network troubleshooting guide to resolve interference and other issues.
    All the best,
    Sterling

  • 802.11n and Airport Express iTunes Base station Help me ?

    I'll try to keep this simple :
    In my Office I have a 24" iMac Intel and the
    802.11n resides also in my Office
    About 40ft away is my Den which resides:
    My MacBook Pro 17" Intel and a Airport Express iTunes
    Base Station
    Going Back to the 802.11n I have a 2.0 USB AC Powered
    Hub connected to the USB port on the back of the 802.11n
    of which  said is OK to do
    Connected to the USB on the back of the 802.11n:
    is a Epson R200 USB InkJet Printer and also on that
    Hub is a Lacie Porche 500gb External USB Hard Drive
    Again  says is Ok to do
    The problem I'm having is that the Cable Modem is
    in my Office and is connected via Ethernet to the 802.11n
    and I can get a strong connection to the internet
    on my iMac 24" Intel in my Office but the MBP 17"
    in my Den is having issues getting onto the Internet
    now about a week ago I spent 8hrs on the phone W/Apple
    about such issues so we erased all the information in
    the Disk Utility and started over with the information
    in the 802.11n and the iTunes Base Station Express
    this has helped until the recent FirmWare Update that
    Apple Released a few days ago,
    I've tried to actual bring my MBP 17" into the Office
    and it gets a better Internet signal than in the Den,
    but this wasn't the way it was before the FirmWare Update
    Any Suggestions on what I can do to fix this situation
    As all worked well with the Express iTunes in the Den
    and the 802.11n in the Office and the Cable Modem has
    always been in the Office ?
    P.S> One problem I forgot to mention is I keep dropping
    The Macbook Pro 17" and a Lacie 400gb Hard Drive which is
    connected directly to the MBP 17" USB Port which keeps
    dropping from my iMac 24" networking it will be working
    fine and then I get a message stating that either or both
    the MBP 17" and the Lacie Disk (400gb) is Disconnecting
    from iMac 24" and then the same will happen on the
    MBP 17" with the iMac 24" and any connected drives I'm
    sharing from the iMac 24" ?
    I'm having a connection problem and I can't get to the
    bottom of it and I need some help please
    Feel free to email me [email protected]

    Updates fixed issue closed question

  • 7925g phones static/hissing and roaming issues

    Hello,
    We've been having an issue for several months now with our over 200 7925g phones.  Nurses are complaining that the phones have static and will drop the voice of the other caller and several times need to repeat the conversation.  We have confirmed several scenario's.  It occurs when both callers are on 7925g inside the coverage areas in the hospital; between 7925g and 7940 desk phone; 7925g and Nortel desk phone.  We've tested on 802.11a and 802.11b/g.  I do see a difference when on 802.11b/g however still get a hissing when connecting to a different AP.
    4 - 4400 controllers,  6.0.202 firmware
    1 - 5508 controller, 6.0.202 firmware
    234 - LAP1131AG AP's
    6 - AP1131AG AP's
    7 - LAP1142N AP's
    3 - LAP1310G AP's
    AP's are on 6.0.202.0 firmware
    7925g's all are on 1.3.3 firmware but we have a select few that we are testing at both hospitals with the newest firmware 1.4.1 and still same results.
    235  - 7925g phones.
    We have followed the 7925g setup & deployment guide, WLC Config Analyzer and made sure all checks were made.  The only setting we plan on testing this week is changing the CCKM authentication change which was recommended.  Currently we are WPA TKIP
    We have disabled the higher rates (36-54) on the 802.11a.
    We also have AirMagnet VoFi analyzer which is showing issues when roaming from AP.  The alarms indicate a one-way audio issue and points to the AP's and phones power not matching.  We have our Tx power level on the controller to automatic, Max Power Level at 30 dBm, Min. at -10 dBm, power Threshold at -70 (WLC Config Analyzer recommendation).  The phone TX Power is set at 8 dBm.  Call Power Save Mode has been tested with both None and U-APDS/PS-Poll.
    We have a case open with Cisco TAC and she has requested debugs from our controllers.  I have sent over 7 and she is not coming back with anything solid and not much help so far.
    Our tests between 802.11a and 802.11b/g (RSSI setting on phone Auto-a and Auto-bg) have shown better with the bg mode but still static and/or hissing.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks.

    Thanks!
    We finally had an awesome Cisco Engineer on our SR.  We straightened out the code and now have the correct 1.4.1.1.1.7 ES image and also configured CCKM.
    We are currently testing with about 20 phones before we deploy it to over 200 phones. 
    Below are the steps we took and so far the tests have resolved the issue.
    1. Downloaded & installed the 1.4.1.1.1.7 code on the 7925g's.
    2. Changed the Scan Mode on the device in Call Manager to 'continuous'
    3. On the Controllers, configured & implemented CCKM on the voice WLAN only.
    4.  Set the Radio Policy for the Voice WLAN to 802.11a only.
    5.  Only using channels 36, 40, 44, 48, 149, 153, 157, 161 on 802.11a
    6.  Disabled the 6,9,36,48 & 54 Mbps rates for 802.11a only
    7. Configured the phone with the new voice SSID with CCKM, Security Mode as EAP-Fast, & 802.11 Mode = Auto-a.
    We are following up with these test users next week so I will post if this fixes our issue.
    Thanks for all the assistance everyone!

  • Can't get Extreme to broadcast 802.11ac, various network issues.

    I have a current gen Extreme being extended by the previous generation Extreme. I have both set to have separate names for the 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks, since I like to manually connect my closer devices to the 5GHz and get much faster speeds.
    However, when I run whatever WiFi analyzer software I can find on my PC, there are a few issues.
    The first of which is that the 5GHz network say that it's only a, not ac. The 2.4GHz network says b, g, n.
    Or I should say networkS, because for some reason when scanned I get results for three separate networks.
    2.4GHz on Channel 11 (b, g, n)
    2.4GHz on Channel 11 (b, g, n)
    5GHz on Channel 157 (a)
    I just set them all to share the same name, just to test it out, and it still shows up as 3 networks and the 5GHz band still isn't 802.11ac, only 802.11a.
    The wireless card I'm scanning with is definitely an 802.11ac card, and it's picking up another network nearby which it shows as "n, ac"
    Can anyone help me out here? I feel like I've got a big mess on my hands. I would imagine that the extender complicates things a bit, but I live in a really big house and it's absolutely necessary to extend the range.
    Obviously the fact that I'm only getting 802.11a on my 5GHz network is also really, really troubling, especially since I'm picking up a nearby connection with both 802.11n and ac, without 802.11a even listed as an option.

    I'm in the northeastern US, so it's certainly not illegal.
    The channel is set to automatic. I haven't checked it again recently since I grabbed inSSIDer instead of whatever tool I was using, but right now regardless of whether or not I set up my 5GHz to have a separate name, it's only showing one single a/g/n network (which I'm positive is a 2.4GHz network). I temporarily disabled the extender, it's 4:18am so I'm not gonna be able to do much else until I wake up later on.
    As for the firmware, I'm running the latest. Airport Utility is also the latest on iOS. I don't use the Windows version, I think it's several years old and doesn't work very well.
    The location is not a problem at all. I'm in the same room as the router, roughly 5-6 feet away under normal circumstances. I'm picking up the AC signal from somewhere else that isn't even near the device, so I don't think it's an issue of range.
    I wish I could check from my iPhone 6 Plus whether or not I'm connecting to AC. When I run a speedtest, I'm getting close to 200mbps which is a good 50-60mbps faster than I was getting on my iPhone 5 before I upgraded.
    I'm going to bed for the night, but I really hope I can get this resolved tomorrow. I imagine I'm going to have to restore the Extreme and the extender to factory settings and start all over again. I just hope that it'll make a difference. No sense in having an AC router if I can't get the speed/range.

  • Failed Hardware Scan and other issues E440

    Hi all,
    This is probably more rant than anything, but I wanted to give a heads up to others too.
    I have a ThinkPad E440 that is a year old. From the very first time I turned it on, there have been issues. The first hardware scan (via Lenovo Solution Center - LSC) showed a warning for the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 Local Connection Test. There were also tons of System Events that always show up in the "Configuration History" part of the LSC. You can look at the calendar and tell exactly which days I used the computer because there will be System Events generated each day. Things like app crashes and failed drivers.
    In July 2014, I got the first warning for the 16 GB SSD - the SMART Short Self-Test. By February this year it showed as failed for each hardware scan (these were initially set up to run monthly).
    Also the whole time I've had it the touch screen would just stop working at some point and I would have to reboot to get it working again.
    I finally called Lenovo on March 30th, before my warranty expired. When I called that time, I didn't realize the hard drive failure was the SSD. So they sent me a new 500 GB drive. I also added the other things into the case when I talked to them. For the wireless issue they suggested making sure the driver was up to date. I did this and let them know when I called back that it was up to date and still having the warning. So I called them to tell them to tell them about the wireless and also that I realized it was the SSD having the failure, not the main drive. The first case had already been closed even though none of the other items were addressed.
    So they opened another case (this is #2). They said to mail them the laptop since the wireless issue would probably be on the board and it wasn't something I could fix myself. They sent a box with a prepaid overnight shipping label. I was very sick for a few days so I sent it back to them on April 10th (a Friday). Via UPS I saw it was delivered on Saturday. Work was performed on it Monday, April 13th and sent back to me that very day. I received it on April 14th. This part of the service has been excellent - very fast response.
    Being in IT, I included a letter with the laptop that outlined the issues that should have been in the case. I also printed the hardware scans and what the system events looked like.
    When I got the laptop back, the sheet inside said they had replaced the Speaker because of Distorted Sound. This was not even on the list even though I had noticed it. I didn't even power up the laptop before calling them again - yes, I was furious! Plus our power was out...
    So this was noon on the 14th. They opened case #3 and sent me ANOTHER BOX so I could send it back.
    After our power came back on the 15th, I powered up my laptop. I opened the browser (I have it set to restore the previous session) and there was a sexually explicit video on YouTube. I opened the other browser and there was a different video on YouTube. So this person was watching YouTube instead of fixing my laptop. I looked through both browser histories and there was quite a bit of activity while my laptop was at the repair center... I ran the hardware scan - still failed and a warning for the wireless. They really hadn't done anything.
    I also found two pictures of the repair person in the recycle bin...
    So I called back. I was LIVID! They opened another case (this is #4). And sent me ANOTHER BOX. I finally learned the other day that once a case is opened, it cannot be edited or added to at all. Instead, they close the other case and open a new one. I guess their turnaround time for closing cases is excellent! I've never seen a system like that - and I've used a lot of them.
    I got a really nice, patient fellow on the line. He took all my info (again). I emailed him the pictures, screen captures of the YouTube videos, the letter I had sent - everything. He entered as much into the new case as he could - he talked to one of the supervisors to make sure he did it right. Somehow he flagged it so that the laptop would get more attention (time) at the repair facility. He also opened a separate case (an escalation ticket?) for a supervisor to call me regarding the person's conduct at the repair facility. He said they would call me that day. (It's now the 25th and I've never heard from anyone)
    So, he sent me ANOTHER BOX. I've built up quite a stack of them.
    Our power was out AGAIN from the 17th through the 19th (don't get me started).
    I noticed a hardware scan had now gotten a failure on the main hard drive. So I called them on the 21st to add this to the case before sending the laptop back. The girl said they can't add anything to an existing case or edit it at all once it's opened. She would have to open a new case and SEND ME ANOTHER BOX. I told her to forget it because I was ready to send it in and didn't want to wait for another box. I also asked for a status on that "escalation case" where the supervisor was supposed to call me. In order to do this she, yes, wait for it, had to open ANOTHER CASE!! So they would know I wanted a status. I'm completely dumbfounded.
    So I sent it back on the 21st. This time I practically wiped it. I had already removed all my files the last time, but I had left my bookmarks and browser history intact.  I set up a guest logon with admin privileges. I updated my letter and printed off more stuff to include with the box. On one sheet I had only the case number, the serial number and machine type. On another sheet I had "DO NOT SEPARATE THIS PAPERWORK FROM THE LAPTOP" and the case number. I put this sheet on top (The guy on the 15th said my letter and stuff may have gotten separated from the laptop once it was delivered to the repair facility). I used a ton of staples so it would all stay together. I included in my letter the failure on the main hard drive and asked if they could look at it. I wrote about having to open a new case if I wanted to include it.
    They received it on the 22nd. A nice gentleman from the repair facility called me that day asking about the password. that. was. written. on the sheet they have you fill out. I told him what happened last time and also mentioned the hard drive failure and asked if he could look into it. He said they would.
    I received my laptop back yesterday morning.The sheet that came with it said they had "replaced the following parts to complete the repair of your laptop."
    Part Description                                           Symptom
    IMAGE                                                             Replaced due to engineering change
    System board                                                 Network card error
    Hard disk drive                                                Network card error
    ECA-WIRELESS                                            <no symptom listed>
    There was also a sheet saying they had installed a factory preload of software and I needed to install Lenovo and Windows updates.
    When I booted it up, the first thing I noticed, in the lower right corner was:
    Windows 8.1
    SecureBoot isn’t configured correctly
    Build 9600
    I ran a hardware scan. Well, I tried. It stopped part way through and said it finished successfully but most of the tasks showed up as cancelled. I tried to run it again - issues - rebooting ensued. It said the LSC wasn’t available and that I should try again or reboot.
    Tried several times. Then got what I guess is the new BSOD - kinder, gentler:
    Your PC ran into a problem and needs to restart. We're just
    collecting some error info, and then we'll restart for you. (xx% complete)
    If you'd like to know more, you can search online later for this error: DRIVER_CORRUPTED_EXPOOL
    Even though the LSC said my Lenovo files were all up to date, I ran the Update. And first I had to download a new version of Update. Then I downloaded all of the Lenovo updates and installed them (there were quite a few). The BIOS update failed. While I was doing the Lenovo downloads, I got a light blue screen but no text (I was out of the room so I'm not sure what happened). Did CTRL-ALT-DEL and it shows only IE and Task Manager as applications that are running. Could not “Switch to” IE. Hitting window key to go to start didn't do anything. So I had to restart.
    By 3pm yesterday there were 34 system events in the configuration history.
    I ran the hardware scan again after I updated the Lenovo files, and you guessed it! Failure on the SSD (SMART Short Self-Test) and warning on the wireless. Nothing had changed. Except hardware scan is acting different than it did before I sent in the laptop for repairs. When it finishes, it instantly closes and just shows 100% complete. When I click on "see last results" it shows a screen called
    Log Information,
    Canceled 04/24/2015 n:nn pm 
    You have not done a hardware test on your computer
    And the calendar in LSC only shows the very first hardware scan I did on Friday. Even the hardware scan screen shows the date and time of the last scan. It also shows the error code. In order to see exactly what is failing, I have to sit there and watch it very closely and snap a picture of the screen as soon as the error (or warning) shows up.
    When I would try to run Windows update, it would hang up PC Settings. I couldn't even kill it using task manager because it didn't show up as a task. During this, I got a flag saying the firewall wasn't turned on. I tried to turn it on, but clicking on Turn on Windows Firewall didn't do anything. I tried to setup my Microsoft account but that just hung too.
    I ended up running Windows Update FOUR TIMES to get all the updates installed. Every time I ran it, it said "Done!" and I would run it again and more would show up. The last time was this morning.
    At some point, the error about SecureBoot went away.
    Then, I created a bootable BIOS update disk. Following the ReadMe instructions, I went through ThinkPad Setup and verified several values. Of note:
    Secure Boot was DISABLED. According to the ReadMe file, this should be ENABLED in Windows 8.1. I enabled it.
    Under Startup/Boot, according to the ReadMe that came with the BIOS update, UEFI/Legacy Boot is supposed to be set at UEFI Only for Windows 8.1. Mine was set to "Both". I changed it.
    In Startup, OS Optimized Defaults was DISABLED, even though it says right there (and in the BIOS update ReadMe) it should be ENABLED to meet Microsoft Windows 8 Certification Requirement.
    After these updates, I flashed the new BIOS.
    Then, I ran hardware scan again...
    Now I have TWO failures on the SSD: Random Seek Test and SMART Short Self-Test. Great.
    In the Event Viewer (that I recently discovered), it says my disk has a bad block. It just says The device, \Device\Harddisk\DR1, has a bad block. I assume this is the SSD...
    There are 867 events in the event viewer - Critical, Error, and Warning...
    Fifty-two of these are from October 7, 2013 - before my little laptop was a glimmer.
    The rest are from when Lenovo had it and yesterday and today.
    64 of them are the disk error.
    341 are from DeviceSetupManager. 65 of those are from failed driver installs. 69 are for not being able to establish a connection to the windows update service. 64 are from not being able to establish a connection to the Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS).
    3 times it's rebooted without cleanly shutting down
    60 of them are from Service Control Manager and say The TDKLIB service failed to start due to the following error: The system cannot find the file specified.
    One of them says {Registry Hive Recovered} Registry hive (file): '\??\C:\Users\Default\NTUSER.DAT' was corrupted and it has been recovered. Some data might have been lost.
    16 are warnings that various processors in Group 0 are being limited by system firmware.
    12 say the certificate for local system with thumbprint <bunch of hex numbers> is about to expire or already expired.
    108 are warnings for failure to load the driver \Driver\WUDFRd for various devices
    16 are application errors
    One is for the computer rebooting from a "bug check"
    15 are for name resolutions timing out after none of the configured DNS servers responded.
    10 are for SecureBoot being disabled.
    14 for services terminating unexpectedly
    15 are for WLAN Extensibility Module has stopped
    61 are for applications not being able to be restarted because the application SID does not match Conductor SID
    12 are for activation of CLSID timing out waiting for the service wuauserv to stop
    So, I'll call them on Monday and open. a. new. case (#5?) - but really 7. And get A NEW BOX.
    I'll keep you updated!

    Hi amycdero and welcome to the HP Forum,
    I understand that you are having scanning and printing issues after upgrading to Mavericks OS X v10.9.1. I will try my best to help you resolve this issue.
    In this document for Mac OS X: Scanning Software Does Not Open or Stops Responding are steps the may help you with your scanning issue.
    This document for Fixing Ink Streaks, Faded Prints, and Other Common Print Quality Problems should help with the streaking printing issue.
    I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know.
    Thank you,
    I worked on behalf of HP.

  • Battery, heat, and ringer issues

    I recently purchased the Iphone 4s.. this is my first iphone
    I did the update that Apple sent out to help the battery and it seems like it worse then before the update??  My phone has been off the charger for 45 minutes, I sent 1 text message, and had 1 phone call.  The percentage is now at 87.  It the last 2 minutes i have watched it go down 2%?  Is this normal?  Also, the phone gets REALLY hot...
    If not, what do I do now??
    Also, I keep missing phone calls because I don't hear the phone ring... but the ringer is all the way up..
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!!

    mdorling wrote:
    We've got the same issues, the BBM contacts went, now the BB won't charge ... we've tried all ways to get it to charge ... typically it's just over a month old so we can't get a full refund ... we are on here trying to find out what we need to do as we can't obtain a telephone number for BB customer services nor an email address only a tweet address which I haven't downloaded onto my handset.  So am stuck!!! Any and all advice very gratefully received as seriously peeved with BB models now.  My first BB was fantastic ... but all newer models have had problems ... think BB needs to ensure that all techy problems are fully ironed out prior to launching their new BB handset!
    1. Connect your Z10 to the wall outlet charger for an hour and then with the Z10 powered on, and with it STILL CONNECTED, remove the battery for a minute and replace. This will normally reset the the on-device battery meter and allow the charging status and percentage to show more correctly.
    2. Orange is your tech support contact and any issue which they cannot resolve, they should escalate up to BlackBerry tier two tech support, or you should ask/demand that.
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • New Airport Extreme and iPhone Issues

    I've had the networking day from ****. I previously had a 3rd Gen Time Capsule at our restaurant, connected to a Cisco 26port gigabit POE switch and Comcast digital voice and internet. Over the past few days, employees have reported trouble accessing the the Wifi network. After several restarts and firmware upgrades (including the dreaded "firmware problem" to fine update), nothing worked. I changed channels, back to auto, back to specific channels, back to auto. Made open guest networks. Nothing worked consistently. My iPhone might connect and my friend's might not. Nor his laptop consistently. Our Axis network cameras might take a bit extra time to connect. All quite random and quite frustrating.
    So I swap out an older Airport Extreme (4th gen I believe) using the same configuration as the TC (Time Capsule). It works fine, except for the last port not working as expected. No matter, I plug the mac mini into the Cisco switch and off we go. Nevertheless, I'm still told we are suffering random Wifi issues. So I buy a brand new AE (5th gen) today to replace that one. Should work like a charm I thought. Right....    
    Several hours later, I finally have the new AE working, but only after doing several hard resets/factory restores, the works. For some reason, the mac mini could not successfully update any of the connected AEs - whether connected directly into the same AE, or if the Mini was connected to the switch. Nothing worked. Every time I tried to update the AE, it would hang and force me to unplug and plug it back in. It would also never save setting changes. I finally resorted to a friend's macbook to be able to restore it successfully. And once that worked, the mini was able to update the AE flawlessly. Our Point of Sales (POS) machines connect fine, our cameras connect fine, wifi printer connects, and the mini connects, and everything has internet.
    Except my iPhone 5. Of course. It gets a signal fine (full bars). It gets an IP address. But I can't surf the web. Or download email. Or iMessages. Anything. No internet access. I try hard restarts on my iphone. I try assigning IP addresses by MAC address. I try resetting the AE. I try renaming the WiFi name. Nothing. I can make a guest network that works (on a different IP table, btw - 172, not 192.) But other than that, no access. Grrrr.
    So I have a "working" AE router where some devices successfully connect (through wifi and ethernet) and some dont' (wifi iPhone). My iPhone connects fine to my home TC. So shouldn't be anything to do with that. But I'm at a loss. I'm going to go back and restore everything and power cycle everything tonight or tomorrow night. I don't know if that will help, but it's worth a try. Lord knows it feels like I've tried everything else.
    Anyone have any good ideas of where to start besides voodoo dolls and baseball bats?

    I took mine back, because I was having these very same issues. We use contivity too. I was able to connect only to one of three of the servers we manage (in Europe). I couldn't connect to the servers in Asia or here in the USA.
    Replaced the Airport Extreme with my trusty old d-link 624, and no issues connecting to any of the three hubs.
    Otherwise, I liked the Airport Extreme, and I'll consider buying it again when and if they address this VPN issue. I work at home so its obviously a "deal breaker" for me.

Maybe you are looking for