A/R INVOICE COPIED WITH WRONG VALUES

Hi all
My client users had entered few correct delivery documents with discount at row level. As the items were excisable so outgoing excise invoice were also entered
Now problem is that while copying delivery documents to A/R invoice, discount at row level wasn't copied. Delivery doc was copied to A/R inv doc (by using copy to functionality) but we wonder discount wasn't copied. No one noticed so in this way many invoices are wrongly copied and entered.
Now we have to make payments but invoices are wrong. What to do?
Please suggest what I can do now and also guide how discounts are not getting copied to target document.
Edited by: Suda.Sampath on Feb 6, 2011 9:18 AM

Hi
Thanks for replying.
Can you please elaborate the procedure for creating A/R credit memos and re creating A/R Invoices as on creating Credit memos following things will happen:
1. Automatic incoming excise invoice will be created at backend which will effect the registers, then do i need to create again outgoing excise invoice from delivery and the A/R invoice. But in that case delivery document is already closed.
I am stuck here. Could you please again explain and suggest.

Similar Messages

Invoice created with wrong net values at header & item

Hi Guys
Due to a wrong user exit, system created few invoices with wrong net values at header & item.
Now system does not allow to cancel those billing documents, showing error message - inconsistency in data.
Eg: Billing Header net value is 10000
Billing Item net value is 5000
when I try to cancel this billing document, cancellation document created with header net value as 5000 & item net value also 5000. So, it says original invoice & cancellation invoice having different values. It is not possible to cancel.
Please suggest me how to correct wrong values at original invoice, which are already released to Accounting. Or else, how to cancel those kind of invoices.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Uma

Hi,
In the original invoice and cancellation invoie is created there is a difference in 5000. It will not allow further cancellation of the invoice because it is already cancelled. I don't know whether there is anyway to reverse the cancellation invoice document.
If it is there then reverse the cancel invoice document and create an invoice correction request document (RK)
Try to replicate the scenario in your test system.
Prase

Webi base on BW query based on Infoset comes back with wrong values

Hello:
I have a Webi report on an OLAP Universe, on Bex Query.
The bex query is based on 1 INFOSET.
When I run the webi report the values that comes back a totally wrong values.
The correct results are not brought back.
When I do a test with crystal reports to the infoset, I can see the correct values. (I'm aware crystal uses different drivers).
The test is BW query designer, and crystal brings back proper values from Infoset based BW query.
Webi on Infoset based BW Query comes back with wrong data.
query is simple.
Pull in 3 attributes, 3 key figures, where componentkey = "111"
I get 36 rows in Crystal and 36 rows in Bex Analyzer, 36 rows in BW query designer (web analyzer).
I get many rows in webi (almost like a CARTENSIAN product).
I search a round this forum but still did not see a conclusive answer to this problem.
But I see another thread that several others faced this same issue without a resolution.
My environment.
BOE XI 3.1 SP2
No fix packs
SAP IK 3.1 SP2
HPUX-IA64
Thanks in advance for any help.
Dwayne

Was this problem ever solved?
I am having a similar problem with an infoset based query.
I have created the BW infoset, and confirmed that the correct data is returned from the underlying infoproviders. A simple BW query on that infoset yields the same results.
Create the universe, and then the WEBI, and WEBI now shows hundreds of records where I expect 10. Data is being returned in WEBI that definitely shouldn't be there. It's almost like the restrictions applied in the characteristic restriction area of my BW query are being ignored, even if I include them in the WEBI query.
Cheers,
Andrew

Smartforms - kbetr (curr11) in invoice with wrong values

Hello,
I am developing an invoice, and this invoice is built on the standard lb_bil_invoice Smartform. The "only" thing not being standard, is that I have to read the kondition items on position level and print them here.
I read the same table (gs_it_kond), as is in the loop for the kondition items.
This works for all fields, except one;
gs_it_price-kbetr (curr11)
As soon as I have this field together with for instance a discount, this field will print the values
mulitplied by 10, but only from the second line! (the first line always prints correctly)
I have debugged it and the funny thing is that the correct value is in the field until the very end - something happens in the moment where I send it to print (it gets printed over an adobe server) which I cannot explain....
Can anyone help me on this matter?
Regards, Anne Kathrine

Hello Ann,
For all the Amounts, the currency referencing should used in order to print correctly.
Try using something like this.
Data: W_kbetr(11)
Write: konv-kbetr to W_kbetr currency konv-waers.
Also the amount field is displayed based on the Calculation type(KRECH) values 'A', 'B', 'C' etc...Percentage, Amount, Qty. resp.
Make sure that before you're doing the manipulations correctly depends on the Calculation type.
Hope this helps.
Kindly assign points if the matter resolved.
Thanks,
-G

Export Excise invoice updating with zero value

HI cin gurus.
While creating excise invoice for Exports in J1IIN , after selecting the Export button Excise values getting changed as zeros . ARE1 form coming with zero
Any reason for that.
Expecting your support
Thanks
JA

Dear Jaffer,
i think you have to apply this user exit
FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_DUTY_IN_EXPORT.
""Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*" REFERENCE(YVBRK) TYPE VBRK
*" EXPORTING
*" REFERENCE(SUPPRESS_CALCULATION) TYPE J_1IEXCHDR-STATUS
*If you do not want the excise duty to be calculated for a particular
*transaction then you need to mark the flag supress_calculation as 'X'
*This flag when left blank will trigger calculation of ED during j1ii
*When it is marked, the ED copied from billing will be left as it is
SUPPRESS_CALCULATION = 'X'.
ENDFUNCTION
Regards,
Anand.K

Problem Regarding Invoice Booking with freight value

Hi,
I have RBKP , RSEG, BKPF, BSEG tables.
I can fetch data from above tables for invoce booking values.
But i can't fetch freight and other charges against particular invoice.So i am getting purchase rate of material without freight
in case of same purchase order and in same item.
one example,
Company purchase one item based on PO today.
after two days Company purchase same item bsed on same PO.Now user make entry of invoice with frieght.Now in two invoice how can i find freight of one invoice.
So kindly suggest how can i link invoice with freight.

Hi,
I tried in my system and its working fine allowing to change the amount in MIRO. My doubt is whether it was client requirement during implementation to set such an error message..
It might has something to do with the Partial Inv. field in the Account assignment category in PO item level..
Are u using Derive from account assignment category???
Please check this answered thread
Error Message M8575 - Partial Invoice not possible
Please check
sBk
Edited by: Sujithbk on Dec 14, 2011 5:56 AM
Edited by: Sujithbk on Dec 14, 2011 5:58 AM

Reversing A/P Invoice posted with wrong date and inventory cost adjustment

Here's the situation:
We had a PO dated 9/1/09 for items with a cost of $14.50, a Goods Receipt was entered 9/15/09 for the items with the same cost on the PO of $14.50. Somehow the order got lost in the mix and the AP invoice wasn't entered until today, with a posting date of 1/21/10 and the cost was corrected per the original vendor invoice to the right amount of $19.33. The invoice was actually dated 9/15/09. This resulted in hitting the vendor, purchases clearing and the inventory account (for the cost adjustment) in January 2010 when it should have occurred in September 2009.
The inventory itself has come and gone in the time between the GR and when the invoice was done with the incorrect date. Normally I would try to reverse the transaction with a Credit Memo and start over, however since the inventory side happened so long ago, I don't see any way of easily going backwards. I thought about doing service CM/invoice but what I am most concerned about is having the inventory valuation occur properly at the correct time. I'm not sure how to go about this.
Using SAP B1 2007A PL42 with moving average inventory.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Nicole,
I am afraid you may not have ability to do the adjustment based on historical date that long times ago. You know, the moving average has limited calculation based on current quantity and cost. There are no options to go backward especially new year is coming.
Thanks,
Gordon

New consolidation group with wrong values

Hi all,
We are working with SEM-BCS 6.0 and we are having an issue that we hope you can help us.
At 012.2008 we have created a new consolidation group (N002) with the consolidation unit 0100.
This consolidation unit (0100) also exists in consolidation group (H001) since 006.2008.
The problem is that at 012.2008 when we use the posting logic u201Cstandardu201D the account values are correct in the consolidation group that used to exist (H001), but for the new consolidation group (N002) the account values are only the delta values.
For example:
011.2008
Account 111000 = 50.000u20AC
012.2008
Account 111000= 60.000u20AC
At 012.2008 in the consolidation group (H001) we have the 60.000u20AC but in the consolidation group N002 the account only has 10.000u20AC (delta)
But if the new consolidation group (N002) only exists since 012.2008 and for the consolidation unit 0100 the first consolidation is defined as 012.2008 why is only being considered the delta (10.000u20AC) and not the all value (60.000u20AC)?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards

We are using the cumulative type of data storing.
Sorry, you can't. It's the system that always stores data periodically. You may just load data cumulatively.
Regardless of type of your load data in the system is always kept periodically.
> The reason for the appearance of this company in another group is only because they want to do a u201Csecondu201D consolidation considering a different group of companies by consolidation area.
> That is, they want to consolidate both consolidation groups with the same companies but with them being considered differently by consolidation areas.
> Is like the second consolidation group is a simulation.
Sorry, Ricardo, I cannot read it in business terms. Different hierarchies, dif. ConsAreas, dif. groups... I do not see why and what for.

Wrong values in the cube S001.

good morning people,
we are with the ecc 6.0 installed almost 01 years, the analysis made in the reports that use the standard cube S001, are with with wrong values. This problem does not happen with all materials in a given month, it appears as if the quantity to be addressed in pending orders, but referring to VA05 or VA05N shows nothing pending.
Being a standard table is not my IT team can not change it, someone already went through this problem, how did you solve it.
Since will thank you.
Jefferson Souza
Multilab Ind e Com Prod Farmaco Ltda
Brazil

Hello Jefferson
Can you elaborate a bit more? When you say cube S001, I think you mean Infostructure S001 which is part of Sales Information System (SIS) reporting. What key figures are showing wrong? Is it open orders quantity/value? Are VA05 or VA05N showing correct values?
Check if you are using any formulas for updates- T code MC26- I doubt it becasue it is a standard table. If they are using custom formulas, may be they are the culprit.
Sometimes document status is not updated and so VA05, VA05N may not be correct. Run reports SDVBUV00, SDVBUK00 and RVV05IVB. Use OSS notes 106567, 128947 for tips before running the reports.

Stop invoice idoc with Zero lines

Hi all,
I need assistance on how I can stop the ouptut to create an invoic idoc with zero value.
Else
as we create workflows for invoice creation. that means we use workflow as soon as the PGI(post goods issue) is done we creare invoice - Can we build a functionality to stop it from creating invoice if the PGI done and the items/ lines with zero value not passed.
Thanks in advance
Jasmeet

Making the bold assumption that you use an outbound IDoc process code that invokes function module IDOC_OUTPUT_INVOIC, you have the user exit LVEDF001 available. This is a standard exit that can be activated and maintained via CMOD.
The first function exit in LVEDF001 is EXIT_SAPLVEDF_001. It contains a call to the include program ZXEDFU01. Therein you can add code that will delete invoice line items having zero quantity or net value from the communication structure DTVBDPR before the IDoc is created.
Regards,
Ken

Excise invoice posted with Zero duty value

Hi,
My client has an STO process where they will generate a proforma Invoice with Excise duties,
Initially when proforma was created excise duties were not reflecting since condition records were not maintained, user was not aware of that and created a excise invoice also with 0 Duty value.
After this condition records were maintained and invoice was updated with excise values. But we are unable to update the excise tables through the same excise invoice no. This transaction is a back dated one for which client has already filed excise returns with SAP Excise number series, Can we pass a JV through FI to adjust the entries or any other solution.
Regards,
Zehran.

Client has done PGI with ZERO quantity
also done billing
if i go to cancel that cancel invoice in J1IIN
it is not allowing to cancel
If your copy control is in line with standard settings, first of all you cannot post the goods issue without any quantity and also generation of billing is not possible.
Coming to your second issue, please try in J1IH instead of J1IIN.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Excise invoice with zero values

Hi SAP Gurus,
In CIN, when I created excise invoice with Tcode J1IIN with reference to invoice, I found zero values. When I checked the pricing conditions tab in Billing, I observed that condition types JEXT and JECT are having zero values. Why the system is not picking the values for these condition types, though condition records are being maintained.? In my pricing procedure there is no UTXJ conditon type. Should I maintain the condition records for UTXJ though it is not in our pricing procedure?, since UTXJ is link between tax procedure, pricing procedure and tax code. I expect guidance in this regard..
Thanks in advance
Raksha.

Hi Raksha
UTXJ is the only condition which brings the tax code in the document, please add utxj and then check it will definately work. I am not replying in detail so if u want any other clarification please reply back.
Best regards
Vineet Baweja

TCode MIR7: Dump while deleting Parked Invoice with zero value

Hi,
We had parked an Invoice using TCode MIR7 with Zero Value with reference of a PO. Now as the value of invoice is zero, we want to delete it using MIR7.
In MIR7, when we go to Invoice Document-->Delete, it results in dump. Dump is as follows:
Error analysis
    Short text of error message:
    No document found
    Long text of error message:
    Technical information about the message:
    Message class....... "FI"
    Number.............. 124
    Variable 1.......... " "
    Variable 2.......... " "
    Variable 3.......... " "
    Variable 4.......... " "
How to correct the error
    Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
    If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
    find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
    If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
    keywords:
    "MESSAGE_TYPE_X" " "
    "SAPLFMPR" or "LFMPRU05"
    "FM_CO_DOCUMENT_DELETE"
    If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
    notification to SAP, include the following information:
    1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
       To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    2. Corresponding system log
       Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
       Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
    after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP
    program: The source code of the program
       In the editor, choose "Utilities->More
    Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".
    4. Details about the conditions under which the error occurred or which actions and input led to the error.
Information on where terminated
    Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLFMPR" - in
     "FM_CO_DOCUMENT_DELETE".
    The main program was "SAPLMR1M ".
    In the source code you have the termination point in line 34
    of the (Include) program "LFMPRU05".
Any help.
Regards,
CMC Team.

Hi,
Check following SAP notes:-
1173846 (MM) Termination when deleting prepaid logistics invoices
Reason and Prerequisites
This problem is caused by a program error.
1224772 (MM) Error message FI24 when deleting parked invoices
Reason and Prerequisites
This is due to a program error. The total amount of the parked invoice is '0'.
Regards,
Anand Raichura

Wrong value with calculated item in pivot table

I have a report with 4 columns:
First Column are Department Dimension
Second Column is Actual value
Third Column is Previous value
Four Column is: ((Actual Value-Previous Value)/Previous Value))*100 that called Var
Then I do a pivot table and I have new calculated item: Department1/Department2 and I have wrong value in four column:
Department----------------------------------Actual-------Previous------Var
Dept1------------------------------------------18503--------16308--------13,5
Dept2-------------------------------------------3758---------3518----------6,8
(Calculated Item: Dept1/Dept2)--------4,92---------4,64------------*2* <---- This value is wrong...and it has to be: 6,03
Is possible to get the correct value???
Thank you very much!

hi,
Create a logical column with ur calculation formula and make it as default agg rule in rpd and answers change it to server determined/server complex agg.I did the same it was working fine for me!!
Check this link
http://books.google.com/books?id=OnbYrkWa4RsC&pg=PA74&lpg=PA74&dq=%22server+complex+aggregate%22&source=web&ots=qxrpaFXmo2&sig=CxLOemzcOlvIiaQ_sQD4fPQotdM&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result#v=onepage&q=%22server%20complex%20aggregate%22&f=false
thanks,
saichand

Clearing WHT on advance & Invoice with same value

Hi SAP Gurus
Could anybody suggest me what transaction code to be used or need any configuration change for clearing both the doc i.e. WHT deduct on advance payment with WHT deducted on Invoice with same value.
In this scenario no further payment should be made.
I have linked both the doc through TCode F-54 and try to clear both the doc with TCode F-44 but in this transaction no tds has been reveresed by the system and showing difference.
In Partial advance payment the system has automatically reversed the TDS. No problem occured in this scenario.
Regards
Aman
Edited by: Amandeep Garg on Mar 17, 2008 10:43 AM

Hi Ahmed
Thanx for your response...............
But I have already used the same. Is there not any transaction other than F-53 in which bank is not invovled.
Regards
Aman

A/R INVOICE COPIED WITH WRONG VALUES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for