Invoice created with wrong net values at header & item

Hi Guys
Due to a wrong user exit, system created few invoices with wrong net values at header & item.
Now system does not allow to cancel those billing documents, showing error message - inconsistency in data.
Eg: Billing Header net value is 10000
Billing Item net value is 5000
when I try to cancel this billing document, cancellation document created with header net value as 5000 & item net value also 5000. So, it says original invoice & cancellation invoice having different values. It is not possible to cancel.
Please suggest me how to correct wrong values at original invoice, which are already released to Accounting. Or else, how to cancel those kind of invoices.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Uma

Hi,
In the original invoice and cancellation invoie is created there is a difference in 5000. It will not allow further cancellation of the invoice because it is already cancelled. I don't know whether there is anyway to reverse the cancellation invoice document.
If it is there then reverse the cancel invoice document and create an invoice correction request document (RK)
Try to replicate the scenario in your test system.
Prase

Similar Messages

Contract net value for Header Statistics is not correct

There is issue with value contract. The net value for Header Statistics is not showing correctly for some contracts. Especially, when we delete the PO line items or reverse all entries (GR and IR) for PO line item.
Contract has one line with account category ‘U’. The target value is 300,000.00 and total quantity released to date is 160,000. The net value for Header Statistics should be 140,000 but it is showing 600,000 which is over (double) the target value and user cannot release any further PO reference to this contract.
Earlier I defined net price for line item 300,000 and I changed net price to zero and execute report RM06ENP0 but it doesn’t work.
Please share your experience and thoughts.
Thanks,
Shah.

Hi Jurgen,
There are few Purchace orders with multiple line items and each line item for Purchase orders referencing the same line and same contract.
There is only one Purchase order has two deleted lines against this contract.
Theses deleted line's net price has changed to zero and there is no PO history.
Contract released order value is correct as there is only one line, but net price is wrong. and user is getting error for target value is excedeed by $nnn when trying to create purchase order.
Thanks,
Shah.

Excise invoice posted with Zero duty value

Hi,
My client has an STO process where they will generate a proforma Invoice with Excise duties,
Initially when proforma was created excise duties were not reflecting since condition records were not maintained, user was not aware of that and created a excise invoice also with 0 Duty value.
After this condition records were maintained and invoice was updated with excise values. But we are unable to update the excise tables through the same excise invoice no. This transaction is a back dated one for which client has already filed excise returns with SAP Excise number series, Can we pass a JV through FI to adjust the entries or any other solution.
Regards,
Zehran.

Client has done PGI with ZERO quantity
also done billing
if i go to cancel that cancel invoice in J1IIN
it is not allowing to cancel
If your copy control is in line with standard settings, first of all you cannot post the goods issue without any quantity and also generation of billing is not possible.
Coming to your second issue, please try in J1IH instead of J1IIN.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Table name for Invoice created with PO ref

hi,
I required Table name for Invoice created with PO ref.
Regards,
Ali

HI,
Check the table RSEG: Document Item: Incoming Invoice
Look for the fields BELNR and EBELN
Regards
KK

Invoice created via SUS having error -The template item 1 does not exists

Hi All,
We are in SRM6.0 and in our PRD system, we have few invoices created through SUS showing error "The template item 1 does not exist.
These invoices went into "To be corrected" status and when I hit check it gives me above error message. The message itself don't make much sense to me. Please note we can create new invoice in SRM manually and everything works fine.
Appreciate any pointers.
Thanks, Sachin

We have analysed the issue and found we are getting this error because these invoices are missing with "BE_LOG_SYSTEM" field in table BBP_PDBEI and "BE_REFOBJ_TYPE" field is showing "BUS2201 instead of "BUS2012".
Any feedback why we have these difference as compare to good invoices (created directly in SRM).
Thanks, Sachin

VF01 : Invoive with a wrong Net Value !

Hi,
i have generated an invoice with Tcode VF01, but the Net value is different from the result of Quantity*Unit price (defined in Tcode VK11).
Please what could be the reason of that ?
Regards.

Dear Jehade,
Not very sure, but check Pricing Date (VF02 > Line Item data> Item detail) as proposed by the System.
Now, validate the same with Condition-record "validity on" in VK12.
Alternatively, go to Header Data details (Menu Bar --> Go To --> Header --> Header --> Tab: Condition) in VF02,
Down there, Tab: Update, click for options. Select "B - carry out new pricing". Now check the Net Value in Document.
Best Regards,
Amit

Invoice IDOC is sending wrong Net value

Hi Champs,
We have an interface whetre Invoices will be sending to the third system through IDOCS.
These are prepared and being transferred by using Standard FM Invoice_Inbound_Asynchronous. But there is a very peculiar problem when sending some invoices, like some invoices are pushing ITEM wise wrong amount thruogh segment E1EDP01 -> E1EDP26 003 -> BETRG (Field). I could not get from where this amount is being picked.
Could any one help me if you face similar type of issue.
In the IDOCS flow of last two years, only 6 IDOCS are sent with wrong amount until now.
Thank You
With Regards,
Ravi kanth Yechuri.

Friends,
can you please hep me out whether i can apply any SAP note or so...
Thank You
Ravi Kanth Yechuri

Net value in header level (sales order)

hi ,
I am creating a sales oder. I have enterned the material in item level with some quantity but the net value of the order at header level is not updating .. y???? help me please.

HI,
you can use following step to tace it:
1. go to header level "conditions" tab page & go for analysis there. you can get the results where & which value its picking there.
2. if its more then 1 line item at item level system will through the consoilidated vale at the header level not for a single line item.
Try this hope this will help u..Revert me if not solved...
Regards
Deepak

Credit memo request with zero net value

Hello all,
when we create a credit memo request (VA01, doc type CR) and put a material quantity into the credit memo request that falls below the scale in VK13, the net value for the material will be zero.
We do not want to allow to save the credit memo request with a zero net value, but SAP will just allow us do that.
I was wondering if there is a way to pop up a warning or even an error message that avoids saving the document in case of a zero net value?
Thanks
Anne

Hi,
You can make the condition type (for which $0.00 is not allowed) as mandatory condition type in the pricing procedure. By this way the system will give error and wont allow to proceed any further unless the data is complete. (make sure this is not affecting your regular sales order cycle).
Or if you just want to give a pop-up message then you can use user exit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in include MV45AFZZ
Regards,

Net Value at Header and Item Level

Guyz
I have a header condition say ZFRE, which is manual. when I see total at header level it should be added to other components and show the Net Value. But, it shouldn't appear at item level Net value. With standard settings, ZFRE is being distributed to item level and item total is also considering this condition.
Thanks!
MAM

Hi,
Header conditions apply to all items in the document and are automatically distributed to the items. A header condition can be based on either a percentage or on an absolute amount. If you enter a header condition that is based on a percentage (for example, a discount of 2%) the system automatically applies this percentage to all items in the document. If the header condition is an absolute amount, there are two different ways in which the system can distribute the amount among the items in the document:
The condition value of a header condition is either
distributed proportionally among the items or
the amount entered at header level is duplicated for each item.
You control the distribution of absolute header conditions in the group price field per condition type. In the standard version, condition type HB00 is marked as a header condition and as group condition. Condition type RB00 is only marked as a header condition.
You can try with User Exit USEREXIT_XKOMV_ERGAENZEN_MANU
in RV61AFZB.
Thanks.
Krishna.

PO created with wrong Company code

Hi Gurus,
I have Plant XXXX assigned to Company code 1111 and
Plant YYYY assigned to Company code 2222
One of the user has created PO with Plant XXXX and company code wrong as 2222.
(we have warning message setup & not error message. So, it allowed user to create PO with wrong Company code and save)
GR & IR both are already posted. I find the accounting document of these GR/IR show correct company code as XXXX-1111 (mostly would have taken correctly based on plant XXXX).
These are service POs (non stock).
Now user wants to change the company code in PO to 1111.
I checked...and system simply allow to change to company code to correct one i.e 1111. It does not give any message.
Could any one give me some additional info.. if it is right to do so? I am not too convinced at this moment.
I was suggesting user to reverse GR, IR, delete PO and create new PO. Is that right?
Thanks n advance for your input.
Best Regards,
Mohan

Dear Mohan,
U can change the company code in PO as it will not have any impact since the GR and IR is completed.
Accounts are hit based on the valution area(valuation grouping code).
Since the PO is already closed u can go ahead the change the same.
Regards,
AM Vahanan

SRM PO created with wrong company code

Hello,
The users have created several PO in SRM with wrong company code. The user was found in the wrong organization structure during the creation of shopping and approval. The PO did not get transfer to the Back because of this. Is there a way to modify the PO and change the company code.
In case we want to modify it in the tables given that BBP_PD gives you an indication of which table and entry to modify, is there a way to do this operation (like SE16N in ECC)? Have you ever done this and what risk is their in such an operation.
Thank you.

Hi,
I doubt anyone here will (or will dare) suggesting to you how to do it as it is against SAP practise totally. if the document is created wrongly, it should be deleted and approved with all the tracking and changes in place for auditing purposes.
Frankly that is what you should practise as well.. my 2cents opinion.
Regards.
YS

Balance carryforward is not correct due to incorrect GL created with wrong

Hi team,
We have created two gl accounts with wrong account group which is balance sheet and also made an postings to that gl account after year end process done so correcting this issue, now we have transferred that amount to new gl account which is p&l account and also we have executed FAGLGVTR (carry forward trasaction)but the amount is not reflecting in retained earning account so pls let me know solution for this issue.
Thanks
SAP

Dear Seshu,
You can Transfer the Retained earnings account balance to a new GL account for Retained earnings. And mark the previous account for mark for deletion / not to use and hence no postings will be allowed in the future to that GL account. And now you can carryforward normally in the future years use.
Regards,
Shankar K B.

How to fix tables created with wrong initial extents

1.We have many tables which are created with very large intial extents. Is there a way to reduce or resize initial extent?
2.When I export the *.dmp is about 200MG, but the tablespace is more than a gig full. Why is that?
3.I have a table with about 300,000 rows and calculated the table size to be around 86M. Should I create the initial extent here to be around 100M?
4.I tried to do alter table ExampleTable deallocate unused, but did not help why is that?
OBJECT_NAME = EMP
TOTAL_BLOCKS = 16296
TOTAL_BYTES = 133496832
UNUSED_BLOCKS = 4915
UNUSED BYTES = 40263680
LAST_USED_EXTENT_FILE_ID = 9
LAST_USED_EXTENT_BLOCK_ID = 23250
LAST_USED_BLOCK = 11381
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> analyze table ibs_spec_value compute statistics;
Table analyzed.
SQL> select empty_blocks, empty_blocks*8192 unused_bytes
2 from dba_tables
3 where table_name='IBS_SPEC_VALUE' and owner='SPEC';
EMPTY_BLOCKS UNUSED_BYTES
4915 40263680
SQL> ALTER TABLE SPEC.IBS_SPEC_VALUE DEALLOCATE UNUSED;
Table altered.
SQL> select empty_blocks, empty_blocks*8192 unused_bytes
2 from dba_tables
3 where table_name='IBS_SPEC_VALUE' and owner='SPEC';
EMPTY_BLOCKS UNUSED_BYTES
4915 40263680
Thank you,
Avanti.

1.We have many tables which are created with very large intial extents. Is there a way to reduce or resize initial extent?
export/import and CTAS.
2.When I export the *.dmp is about 200MG, but the tablespace is more than a gig full. Why is that?
Probably it is due of inefficient on managing the objects, which are heavily taken by tables/indexes. Tables/indexes were created oversize than estimation of data size.
3.I have a table with about 300,000 rows and calculated the table size to be around 86M. Should I create the initial extent here to be around 100M?
Yes, it is possible. Usually split into 2-5 extents is better.
4.I tried to do alter table ExampleTable deallocate unused, but did not help why is that?
OBJECT_NAME = EMP
TOTAL_BLOCKS = 16296
TOTAL_BYTES = 133496832
UNUSED_BLOCKS = 4915
UNUSED BYTES = 40263680
LAST_USED_EXTENT_FILE_ID = 9
LAST_USED_EXTENT_BLOCK_ID = 23250
LAST_USED_BLOCK = 11381
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> analyze table ibs_spec_value compute statistics;
Table analyzed.
SQL> select empty_blocks, empty_blocks*8192 unused_bytes
2 from dba_tables
3 where table_name='IBS_SPEC_VALUE' and owner='SPEC';
EMPTY_BLOCKS UNUSED_BYTES
4915 40263680
SQL> ALTER TABLE SPEC.IBS_SPEC_VALUE DEALLOCATE UNUSED;
Table altered.
SQL> select empty_blocks, empty_blocks*8192 unused_bytes
2 from dba_tables
3 where table_name='IBS_SPEC_VALUE' and owner='SPEC';
EMPTY_BLOCKS UNUSED_BYTES
4915 40263680
The next paragraph is guoted from Oracle documentation :
"Use the deallocate_unused_clause to explicitly deallocate unused space at the end of the table, partition or subpartition, overflow data segment, LOB data segment, or LOB index and makes the space available for other segments in the tablespace. You can free only unused space above the high water mark (that is, the point beyond which database blocks have not yet been formatted to receive data)".
Most probably on your case there is no unused block over the last used block on this table. So the deallocate function doesn't give any effect. As you described, the last used block is 11381 which is get from TOTAL_BLOCKS minus UNUSED_BLOCKS.

Condition type determined but net value of the item is zero

Hello guys
In one of my sales process I have a single condition type assigned to the pricing procedure, when I create a sales order then system is determining value of that condition type but system makes the net value to zero. Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Javed Ihsan

Hi Javed,
The reason for the same could be that
1. the conditions is statistical
2. The net value can only be seen at the header if you have maintained the net value as one of the line items in the pricing procedure.
Kindly check.
Hope this help.
Reward with points if helpfull !!!!!!!!
Regards,
Rekha Dadwal

Invoice created with wrong net values at header & item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for