ABAP select statements takes too long

Hi,
I have a select statement as shown below.
SELECT * FROM BSEG INTO TABLE ITAB_BSEG
                     WHERE BUKRS = CO_CODE
                     AND    BELNR IN W_DOCNO
                     AND    GJAHR = THISYEAR
                     AND    AUGBL NE SPACE.
This select statement runs fine in all of R/3 systems except for 1. The problem that is shown with this particular system is that the query takes very long ( up to an hour for if W_DOCNO consists of 5 entries). Sometimes, before the query can complete, an ABAP runtime error is encountered as shown below:
<b>Database error text........: "ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment
number 7 with name "PRS_5" too small?"
Internal call code.........: "[RSQL/FTCH/BSEG ]"
Please check the entries in the system log (Transaction SM21). </b>
Please help me on this issue. However, do not give me suggestions about selecting from a smaller table (bsik, bsak) as my situation does not permit it.
I will reward points.

dont use select * ....
instead u declare ur itab with the required fields and then in select refer to the fields in the select .
data : begin of itab,
         f1
         f2
         f3
         f4
         end of itab.
select f1 f2 f3 f4 ..
     into table itab
from bseg where ...
. this improves the performance .
select * is not advised .
regards,
vijay

Similar Messages

Update statement takes too long to run

Hello,
I am running this simple update statement, but it takes too long to run. It was running for 16 hours and then I cancelled it. It was not even finished. The destination table that I am updating has 2.6 million records, but I am only updating 206K records. If add ROWNUM <20 to the update statement works just fine and updates the right column with the right information. Do you have any ideas what could be wrong in my update statement? I am also using a DB link since CAP.ESS_LOOKUP table resides in different db from the destination table. We are running 11g Oracle Db.
UPDATE DEV_OCS.DOCMETA IPM
SET IPM.XIPM_APP_2_17 = (SELECT DISTINCT LKP.DOC_STATUS
FROM [email protected] LKP
WHERE LKP.DOC_NUM = IPM.XIPM_APP_2_1 AND
IPM.XIPMSYS_APP_ID = 2
WHERE
IPM.XIPMSYS_APP_ID = 2;
Thanks,
Ilya

matthew_morris wrote:
In the first SQL, the SELECT against the remote table was a correlated subquery. the 'WHERE LKP.DOC_NUM = IPM.XIPM_APP_2_1 AND IPM.XIPMSYS_APP_ID = 2" means that the subquery had to run once for each row of DEV_OCS.DOCMETA being evaluated. This might have meant thousands of iterations, meaning a great deal of network traffic (not to mention each performing a DISTINCT operation). Queries where the data is split between two or more databases are much more expensive than queries using only tables in a single database.Sorry to disappoint you again, but with clause by itself doesn't prevent from "subquery had to run once for each row of DEV_OCS.DOCMETA being evaluated". For example:
{code}
SQL> set linesize 132
SQL> explain plan for
2 update emp e
3 set deptno = (select t.deptno from dept@sol10 t where e.deptno = t.deptno)
4 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3247731149
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT|
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 14 | 42 | 17 (83)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | UPDATE | EMP | | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 14 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 3 | REMOTE | DEPT | 1 | 13 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | SOL10 | R->S |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
3 - SELECT "DEPTNO" FROM "DEPT" "T" WHERE "DEPTNO"=:1 (accessing 'SOL10' )
16 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 update emp e
3 set deptno = (with t as (select * from dept@sol10) select t.deptno from t where e.deptno = t.deptno)
4 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3247731149
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT|
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 14 | 42 | 17 (83)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | UPDATE | EMP | | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 14 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 3 | REMOTE | DEPT | 1 | 13 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | SOL10 | R->S |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
3 - SELECT "DEPTNO" FROM "DEPT" "DEPT" WHERE "DEPTNO"=:1 (accessing 'SOL10' )
16 rows selected.
SQL>
{code}
As you can see, WITH clause by itself guaranties nothing. We must force optimizer to materialize it:
{code}
SQL> explain plan for
2 update emp e
3 set deptno = (with t as (select /*+ materialize */ * from dept@sol10) select t.deptno from t where e.deptno = t.deptno
4 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3568118945
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT|
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 14 | 42 | 87 (17)| 00:00:02 | | |
| 1 | UPDATE | EMP | | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | EMP | 14 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 3 | TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION | | | | | | | |
| 4 | LOAD AS SELECT | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_1CEEEBC | | | | | | |
| 5 | REMOTE | DEPT | 4 | 80 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | SOL10 | R->S |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 6 | VIEW | | 4 | 52 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_1CEEEBC | 4 | 80 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
6 - filter("T"."DEPTNO"=:B1)
Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
5 - SELECT "DEPTNO","DNAME","LOC" FROM "DEPT" "DEPT" (accessing 'SOL10' )
25 rows selected.
SQL>
{code}
I do know hint materialize is not documented, but I don't know any other way besides splitting statement in two to materialize it.
SY.

Select statement takes very long

Hello from Germany,
how comes that from one week to another my select-statement "select MAX(PRIMARYKEY) from mytable t where t.IntegerColumn = 5" takes 20times longer (25s) than before (0,4s)?
The RowCount of myTable is 89899.
Best Regards
Marlon

Hi all together,
a "select * from all_tables" shows me or my table following facts:
PCT_free 0
PCT_used 0
INI_TRANS 0
MAX_TRANS 0
INITIAL_EXTENT 409600000
NEXT_EXTENT 5120000
MIN_EXTENT 1
MAX_EXTENT 2147483645
PCT_INCREASE 0
FREE_LISTS 1
NUM_ROWS 60829
BLOCKS 41559
Other facts needed?
Hope You can help me?!
Marlon

Select statement takes very long to run with order by clause.

Hi all,
I have a select statement which when I run without the order by clause takes arround 2 minutes to run. But with the order by clause it goes on for ever. I am trying to access the database server through a network which is not too fast.
The select statement is based on 9 views which are again based on some views. It also has inline views and outer joins. These views and inline views can not be done away with.
When selected without the order by clause it gives 3215 records.
Anything like 2 to 3 minutes will be Ok.
Thanks.
--Malay

The select statement is as follows :-
SELECT f.system_name,
a.signal_type,
f.sys_signal_name,
a.bus_desc,
b.vl_ident,
b.vl_name,
b.src_mac,
b.src_mac_addr,
b.dest_mac,
b.dest_mac_addr,
b.network,
bb.bufr_size_in_bytes,
bb.bag_in_ms,
bb.is_rma_used,
bb.is_ic_used,
bb.sub_vl_cnt,
bb.skew_max_in_ns,
cc.msg_name,
c.src_ip,
c.src_ip_addr,
c.src_port,
c.dest_ip,
c.dest_ip_addr,
c.dest_port,
cc.rate_in_ms,
cc.tx_mode,
cc.protocol,
cc.port_type,
cc.msg_length_in_bytes,
d.mnemonic,
d.start_addr32,
d.lsb,
d.end_addr32,
d.msb,
d.format,
d.init_value,
d.fs_mnemonic,
d.fs_afdx_data_id,
d.digital_data_id,
DECODE(
d.digital_datatype,
NULL, '',
'UNUSED', '',
api$util.concat_column_data(
'api_'
|| d.digital_datatype,
'digital_data_id',
d.digital_data_id,
bool.FALSE
) AS data_details,
f.connection_id
|| '_'
|| a.digital_bus_id
|| '_'
|| b.afdx_vl_id
|| '_'
|| bb.afdx_output_id
|| '_'
|| c.afdx_frame_id
|| '_'
|| cc.afdx_msg_id
|| '_'
|| d.afdx_data_id AS KEY
FROM api_afdx a,
api_afdx_vl b,
api_afdx_output bb,
api_afdx_frame c,
api_afdx_msg cc,
api_afdx_data d,
vf_signal e,
(SELECT DISTINCT aa.signal_id,
cc.system_name,
bb.connection_id,
bb.sys_signal_name
FROM vf_nodes aa,
vf_connections bb,
vf_system cc
WHERE aa.connection_id = bb.connection_id
AND bb.system_id = cc.system_id) f
WHERE e.signal_id = f.signal_id(+)
AND e.digital_bus_id = a.digital_bus_id
               AND a.digital_bus_id = bb.digital_bus_id(+)
AND bb.afdx_output_id = b.afdx_output_id(+)
               AND b.afdx_vl_id = c.afdx_vl_id(+)
AND bb.afdx_output_id = cc.afdx_output_id(+)
AND cc.afdx_msg_id = d.afdx_msg_id(+)
ORDER BY f.system_name,
a.signal_type,
f.sys_signal_name,
b.vl_name,
cc.msg_name,
d.start_addr32,
d.lsb;
Where api_afdx ,
api_afdx_vl ,
api_afdx_output ,
api_afdx_frame ,
api_afdx_msg ,
api_afdx_data ,
vf_signal ,
vf_nodes ,
vf_connections ,
vf_system
are all views.

SELECT statement takes long time

Hi All,
In the following code, if the T_QMIH-EQUNR contains blank or space values ,SELECT statement takes longer time to acess the data from OBJK table. If it T_QMIH-EQUNR contains values other than blank, performance is good and it fetches data very fast.
Already we have indexes for EQUNR in OBJK table.
Only for blank entries , it takes much time.Can anybody tell why it behaves for balnk entries?
if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
        SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
        REFRESH T_OBJK.
        SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
          FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
          FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
          WHERE OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
         OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
Thanks
Ajay

Hi
You can use the field QMIH-QMNUM with OBJK-IHNUM
in QMIH table, EQUNR is not primary key, it will have multiple entries
so to improve the performance use one dummy internal table for QMIH and sort it on EQUNR
delete adjacent duplicates from d_qmih and use the same in for all entries
this will improve the performance.
Also use the fields in sequence of the index and primary keys also in select
if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
REFRESH T_OBJK.
SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
WHERE IHNUM = T_QMIH-QMNUM
OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
try this and let me know
regards
Shiva

Accessing BKPF table takes too long

Hi,
Is there another way to have a faster and more optimized sql query that will access the table BKPF? Or other smaller tables that contain the same data?
I'm using this:
   select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart
   into corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
   from bkpf
   where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
   and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
   and blart in so_DocTypes
   and monat in so_monat.
The report is taking too long and is eating up a lot of resources.
Any helpful advice is highly appreciated. Thanks!

Hi max,
I also tried using BUDAT in the where clause of my sql statement, but even that takes too long.
    select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat in so_budat.
I also tried accessing the table per day, but it didn't worked too...
   while so_budat-low le so_budat-high.
     select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat eq so_budat-low.
     so_budat-low = so_budat-low + 1.
   endwhile.
I think our BKPF tables contains a very large set of data. Is there any other table besides BKPF where we could get all accounting document numbers in a given period?

My Query takes too long ...

Hi ,
Env   , DB 10G , O/S Linux Redhat , My DB size is about 80G
My query takes too long , about 5 days to get results , can you please help to rewrite this query in a better way ,
declare
x number;
y date;
START_DATE DATE;
MDN VARCHAR2(12);
TOPUP VARCHAR2(50);
begin
for first_bundle in
select min(date_time_of_event) date_time_of_event ,account_identifier ,top_up_profile_name
from bundlepur
where account_profile='Basic'
AND account_identifier='665004664'
and in_service_result_indicator=0
and network_cause_result_indicator=0
and   DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT >= to_date('16/07/2013','dd/mm/yyyy')
group by account_identifier,top_up_profile_name
order by date_time_of_event
loop
select sum(units_per_tariff_rum2) ,max(date_time_of_event)
into x,y
from OLD_LTE_CDR
where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
and date_time_of_event >= (select first_bundle.date_time_of_event from dual)
and -- no more than a month
date_time_of_event < ( select add_months(first_bundle.date_time_of_event,1) from dual)
and -- finished his bundle then buy a new one
date_time_of_event < ( SELECT MIN(DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT)
                         FROM OLD_LTE_CDR
                         WHERE DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT > (select (first_bundle.date_time_of_event)+1/24 from dual)
                         AND IN_SERVICE_RESULT_INDICATOR=26);
select first_bundle.account_identifier ,first_bundle.top_up_profile_name
,FIRST_BUNDLE.date_time_of_event
INTO MDN,TOPUP,START_DATE
from dual;
insert into consumed1 VALUES(X,topup,MDN,START_DATE,Y);
end loop;
COMMIT;
end;

> where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
Why are you doing this? It's a completely unnecessary subquery.
Just do this:
where account_identifier = first_bundle.account_identifier
Same for all your other FROM DUAL subqueries. Get rid of them.
More importantly, don't use a cursor for loop. Just write one big INSERT statement that does what you want.

Update statement taking too long to execute

Hi All,
I'm trying to run this update statement. But its taking too long to execute.
    UPDATE ops_forecast_extract b SET position_id = (SELECT a.row_id
        FROM s_postn a
        WHERE UPPER(a.desc_text) = UPPER(TRIM(B.POSITION_NAME)))
        WHERE position_level = 7
        AND b.am_id IS NULL;
        SELECT COUNT(*) FROM S_POSTN;
        214665
        SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ops_forecast_extract;
        49366
SELECT count(*)
        FROM s_postn a, ops_forecast_extract b
        WHERE UPPER(a.desc_text) = UPPER(TRIM(B.POSITION_NAME));
575What could be the reason for update statement to execute so long?
Thanks

polasa wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to run this update statement. But its taking too long to execute.
What could be the reason for update statement to execute so long?You haven't said what "too long" means, but a simple reason could be that the scalar subquery on "s_postn" is using a full table scan for each execution. Potentially this subquery gets executed for each row of the "ops_forecast_extract" table that satisfies your filter predicates. "Potentially" because of the cunning "filter/subquery optimization" of the Oracle runtime engine that attempts to cache the results of already executed instances of the subquery. Since the in-memory hash table that holds these cached results is of limited size, the optimization algorithm depends on the sort order of the data and could suffer from hash collisions it's unpredictable how well this optimization works in your particular case.
You might want to check the execution plan, it should tell you at least how Oracle is going to execute the scalar subquery (it doesn't tell you anything about this "filter/subquery optimization" feature).
Generic instructions how to generate a useful explain plan output and how to post it here follow:
Could you please post an properly formatted explain plan output using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY including the "Predicate Information" section below the plan to provide more details regarding your statement. Please use the {noformat}[{noformat}code{noformat}]{noformat} tag before and {noformat}[{noformat}/code{noformat}]{noformat} tag after or the {noformat}{{noformat}code{noformat}}{noformat} tag before and after to enhance readability of the output provided:
In SQL*Plus:
SET LINESIZE 130
EXPLAIN PLAN FOR <your statement>;
SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);Note that the package DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY is only available from 9i on.
In 9i and above, if the "Predicate Information" section is missing from the DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY output but you get instead the message "Plan table is old version" then you need to re-create your plan table using the server side script "$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlxplan.sql".
In previous versions you could run the following in SQL*Plus (on the server) instead:
@?/rdbms/admin/utlxplsA different approach in SQL*Plus:
SET AUTOTRACE ON EXPLAIN
<run your statement>;will also show the execution plan.
In order to get a better understanding where your statement spends the time you might want to turn on SQL trace as described here:
When your query takes too long ...
and post the "tkprof" output here, too.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Sometimes my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I am running a pretty powerful work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network, is it a hard drive issue? do I need to "clean out" the computer?

Many times my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I have wireless internet (time capsule) and I am running a pretty powerful real time financial work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network? is it a hard drive issue? do I only need to "clean out" the computer? Or all of the above...not to computer saavy. It is a Macbook Pro osx 10.6.8 (late 2010).

Almost certainly none of the above! Try each of the following in this order:
Select 'Reset Safari' from the Safari menu.
Close down Safari; move <home>/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db to the trash; restart Safari.
Change the DNS servers in your network settings to use the OpenDNS servers: 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220
Turn off DNS pre-fetching by entering the following command in Terminal and restarting Safari:
defaults write com.apple.safari WebKitDNSPrefetchingEnabled -boolean false

Report Takes Too Long Time

Hi!
I am in troubble
following is the query
SELECT inv_no, inv_name, inv_desc, i.cat_id, cat_name, i.sub_cat_id,
sub_cat_name, asset_cost, del_date, i.bl_id, gen_desc bl_desc, p.prvcode, prvdesc, cur_loc,
pldesc, i.pmempno, pmname, i.empid, empname
FROM inv_reg i,
cat_reg c,
sub_cat_reg s,
gen_desc_reg g,
ploc p,
province r,
pmaster m,
iemp_reg e
WHERE i.sub_cat_id = s.sub_cat_id
AND i.cat_id = s.cat_id
AND s.cat_id = c.cat_id
AND i.bl_id = g.gen_id
AND i.cur_loc = p.plcode
AND p.prvcode = r.prvcode
AND i.pmempno = m.pmempno(+)
AND i.empid = e.empid(+)
&wc
order by prvdesc, pldesc, cat_name, sub_cat_name, inv_no
and this query returns 32000 records
when i run this query on reports 10g
then it takes 10 to 20 minuts to generate report
how can i optimize it...?

Hi Waqas Attari
Pls study & try this ....
When your query takes too long ...
hope it helps....
Regards,
Abdetu...

Web application deployment takes too long?

Hi All,
We have a wls 10.3.5 clustering environment with one admin server and two managered servers separately. When we try to deploy a sizable web application, it takes about 1 hour to finish. It seems that it takes too long to finish the deployment. Here is the output from one of two managerd server system log. Could anyone tell me it is normal or not? If not, how can I improve this?
Thanks in advance,
John
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:03 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535463373> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:05 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <9baa7a67b5727417:26f76f6c:135ca05cff2:-8000-00000000000000b0> <1330535465664> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442300> <BEA-320143> <Scheduled 1 data retirement tasks as per configuration.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive HarvestedDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive HarvestedDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive EventsDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive EventsDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:23 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <weblogic.cluster.MessageReceiver> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539023098> <BEA-003107> <Lost 2 unicast message(s).>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:36 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539036105> <BEA-000111> <Adding Pinellas1tMS2 with ID -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 to cluster: Pinellas1tCluster1 view.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084375> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084507> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:36 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:37 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:38 AM

Hi John,
There may be some circumstances like when there are many files in the WEB-INF folder and JPS don't use TLD.
I don't think a 1hour deployment is normal, it should be much more faster.
Since you are using 10.3.5, I suggesto you to install the corresponding patch:
1. Download patch 10118941p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
2. Uncompress the file p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
3. Copy the required files (patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml, CIRF.jar ) to the Patch Download Directory (typically, this folder is <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/cache_dir).
4. Rename the file patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml into patch-catalog.xml .
5. Start Smart Update from <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/bsu.sh .
6. Select "Work Offline" mode.
7. Go to File->Preferences, and select "Patch Download Directory".
8. Click "Manage Patches" on the right panel.
9. You will see the patch in the panel below (Downloaded Patches)
10. Click "Apply button" of the downloaded patch to apply it to the target installation and follow the instructions on the screen.
11. Add "-Dweblogic.jsp.ignoreTLDsProcessingInWebApp=true" to the Java options to ignore additional findTLDs cost.
12. Restart servers.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Cris

RPURMP00 program takes too long

Hi Guys,
Need some help on this one guys. Not getting any where with this issue.
I am running RPURMP00 ( Program to Create Third-Party Remittance Posting Run ) and while running it in test mode for 1 employee it takes too long .
I ran this in background during off hours , but it takes 19,000 + sec to run and then cancels .
The long text message is No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO (Remittance detail table for all entities) for key 0002485844    and     Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE
I check the program and I found a nested loop within the program (include RPURMP02 ) and decided to debug it with a break point.
It short dumped and here is the st22 message and source code extract.
      ----Message -
" Time limit exceeded ".
"The program "RPURMP00" has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime without
Interruption and has therefore been terminated."
      ----Source code extract -
Include RPURMP02
172 &----
173 *&      Form get_advice_info
174 &----
175 *       text
176 ----
177 * --> p1        text
178 * <-- p2        text
179 ----
180 FORM get_advice_info .
181
182 * get information for advice form only if vendor sub-group and
183 * employee detail is maintained
184   IF ( NOT t51rh-lifsg IS INITIAL ) AND
185      ( NOT t51rh-hrper IS INITIAL ).
186
187 *   get remittance items employee number
188     SELECT * FROM t51r4 WHERE remky = t51r5-remky. "#EC CI_GENBUFF "SAM0632658
189 *     get payroll seqno determined by PERNR and RDATN
>>>>>       SELECT * FROM t51r8 WHERE pernr = t51r4-pernr
191                             AND rdatn = t51r5-rdatn
192                             ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY. "#EC CI_GENBUFF
193         EXIT.
194       ENDSELECT.
Has anyone ever come across this situation? Any input from anyone on this?
Regards.
CJ

Hi,
What is your SAP version?
Have you checked if some OSS notes is there on performance.
Regards,
Atish

AME CS6 rendering with AE and Pr takes too long

Hi Guys,
Need some help here. i have rendered a 30 secs mp4 video with 1920 x 1080 HD format 25 frames w/o scripting in AME for 4 hours!
Why does it take too long? I have rendered a 2 minute video with same format w/ scripting but only spare less than 30 minutes for rendering.
Im using After Effects and Premium Pro both CS6 and using Dynamic Link in AME.
What seems to be wrong in my current settings?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!

This may be a waste of time, but it won't take a minute and is something you should always do whenever things go strangely wrong ............ trash the preferences, assuming you haven't done it already.
Many weird things happen as a result of corrupt preferences which can create a vast range of different symptoms, so whenever FCP X stops working properly in any way, trashing the preferences should be the first thing you do using this free app.
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/prefman/
Shut down FCP X, open PreferenceManager and in the window that appears:-
1. Ensure that only FCP X is selected.
2. Click Trash
The job is done instantly and you can re-open FCP X.
There is absolutely no danger in trashing preferences and you can do it as often as you like.
The preferences are kept separately from FCP X and if there aren't any when FCP X opens it automatically creates new ones . . . instantly.

Sql Query takes too long to enter into the first line

Hi Friends,
I am using SQLServer 2008. I am running the query for fetching the data from database. when i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second) to enter into first
line of the stored procedure. After its enter into the first statement of the SP, its fetching the data within a second. I think there is no problem with Sqlquery. Kindly let me know if you know the reason behind this.
Sample Example:
Create Sp Sp_Name
as
Begin
print Getdate()
Sql statements for fetching datas
Print Getdate()
End
In the above example, there is no difference between first date and second date.
Please help me to trouble shooting this problem.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar.R

i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second)
Additional to Manoj: A
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE clears the procedure cache, so all store procedure must be newly compilied on the first call.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

Unlike IE When back button is pressed it takes too long. pleas do something for that. thnx.

Unlike IE When back button is pressed it takes too long. pleas do something for that. I like firefox and i get to use the back button more often.
thnx

In order to be able to find the correct solution to your problem, we require some more non-personal information from you. Please do the following:
*Click the Firefox button at the top left, then click the ''Help'' menu and select ''Troubleshooting Information'' from the submenu. If you don't have a Firefox button, click the Help menu at the top and select ''Troubleshooting Information'' from the menu.
Now, a new tab containing your troubleshooting information should open.
*At the top of the page, you should see a button that says "Copy text to clipboard". Click it.
*Now, go back to your forum post and click inside the reply box. Press Ctrl+V to paste all the information you copied into the forum post.
If you need further information about the Troubleshooting information page, please read the article [[Use the Troubleshooting Information page to help fix Firefox issues]].
Thanks in advance for your help!

ABAP select statements takes too long

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for