About Database Design

Hello All,
I am using Oracle 11g R2 SOE.
What is the best practice for Real Estate Data Model ?
This one :
http://www.databaseanswers.org/data_models/real_estate_properties/index.htm
Or
As I got, In this thread {thread:id=2521579} I was advised to store the details of Properties in one Table, and create views on that table for each Category (Apartment, Plot , Office ..)
CREATE TABLE UNIT
    ID           NUMBER (5) NOT NULL ,
    BUILDING_ID  NUMBER (3) NOT NULL ,
    UNIT_NO      VARCHAR2 (10 BYTE) NOT NULL ,
    CAT_ID       NUMBER (2) NOT NULL , -- Apartment , Office ... Plot
    OWNER_ID     NUMBER (5) NOT NULL ,
    UNIT_SIZE    NUMBER (6) NOT NULL ,
    UNIT_VIEW    NUMBER (3) NOT NULL ,
    LISTED_BY    NUMBER (2) NOT NULL ,
    IS_EXCLUSIVE VARCHAR2 (1 BYTE) DEFAULT 'N' ,
    KEY_STATUS   NUMBER (2) ,
    VIDEO        VARCHAR2 (11 BYTE) ,
    NOTE        VARCHAR2 (300 BYTE) ,
    CREATED      TIMESTAMP ,
    CREATED_BY   VARCHAR2 (15 BYTE) ,
    UPDATED      TIMESTAMP ,
    UPDATED_BY   VARCHAR2 (15 BYTE)
ALTER TABLE UNIT ADD CONSTRAINT UNIT_PK PRIMARY KEY
  ID
ALTER TABLE UNIT ADD CONSTRAINT UNIT_UN UNIQUE
  BUILDING_ID , UNIT_NO
;The question is about CAT_ID. The Categories Lookup table contains these values:
Apartment.
Office.
Retail.
Plot.
Full Building.
Warehouse
Villa
The main difference between Apartment/Office and Plot / Full building are:
The attributes of Apartment / Office are  :
Beds  ( When Office, it is beds is 0)  , Balcony_number  , parking
The attributes of Plot / Full building are   :
Height , Built up area , Use_id  (Plot use could be Residential or commercial or mixed )So, shall I add these 6 columns to the UNITES Table and create views on it ??? Or I should go with the aforementioned model in databaseanswers.org ?
** I use ORACLE APEX..
Regards,
Fateh
Edited by: Fateh on May 2, 2013 7:58 PM

Fateh wrote:
The question now, is it fine for those categories if they share the same columns where the values have different meaning based on the Category ? Namely,
the column Beds may have these values:
If it is Office then 0
If it is Apartment then 1 - 8
If it is Plot then 10 - 120
You're talking about a single attribute that has different meanings based on the value of another attribute, in another relation. That does not make logical sense to me, and I wouldn't ever do that. Those values would be rendered meaningless if the category you use to derive their meanings is deleted.

Similar Messages

  • IF Auto Update Statistics ENABLED in Database Design, Why we need to Update Statistics as a maintenance plan

    Hi Experts,
    IF Auto Update Statistics ENABLED in Database Design, Why we need to Update Statistics as a maintenance plan for Daily/weekly??
    Vinai Kumar Gandla

    Hi Vikki,
    Many systems rely solely on SQL Server to update statistics automatically(AUTO UPDATE STATISTICS enabled), however, based on my research, large tables, tables with uneven data distributions, tables with ever-increasing keys and tables that have significant
    changes in distribution often require manual statistics updates as the following explanation.
    1.If a table is very big, then waiting for 20% of rows to change before SQL Server automatically updates the statistics could mean that millions of rows are modified, added or removed before it happens. Depending on the workload patterns and the data,
    this could mean the optimizer is choosing a substandard execution plans long before SQL Server reaches the threshold where it invalidates statistics for a table and starts to update them automatically. In such cases, you might consider updating statistics
    manually for those tables on a defined schedule (while leaving AUTO UPDATE STATISTICS enabled so that SQL Server continues to maintain statistics for other tables).
    2.In cases where you know data distribution in a column is "skewed", it may be necessary to update statistics manually with a full sample, or create a set of filtered statistics in order to generate query plans of good quality. Remember,
    however, that sampling with FULLSCAN can be costly for larger tables, and must be done so as not to affect production performance.
    3.It is quite common to see an ascending key, such as an IDENTITY or date/time data types, used as the leading column in an index. In such cases, the statistic for the key rarely matches the actual data, unless we update the Statistic manually after
    every insert.
    So in the case above, we could perform manual statistics updates by
    creating a maintenance plan that will run the UPDATE STATISTICS command, and update statistics on a regular schedule. For more information about the process, please refer to the article:
    https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/performance/managing-sql-server-statistics/
    Regards,
    Michelle Li

  • Logical Database design and physical database implementation

    Hi
    I am an ORACLE DBA basically and we started a proactive server dashboard portal ,which basically reports all aspects of our infrastructure (Dev,QA and Prod,performance,capacity,number of servers,No of CPU,decomissioned date,OS level,Database patch level) etc..
    This has to be done entirely by our DBA team as this is not externally funded project.Now i was asked to do " Logical Database design and physical Database
    implementation"
    Even though i know roughly what's that mean(like designing whole set of tables in star schema format) ,i have never done this before.
    In my mind i have a rough set of tables that can be used but again i think there is lot of engineering involved in this area to make sure that we do it properly.
    I am wondering you guys might be having some recommendations for me in the sense where to start?are there any documents online , are there any book on this topic?Are there any documents which explain this phenomena with examples ?
    Also exactly what is the difference between logical database design vs physical database implementation
    Thanks and Regards

    Logical database design is the process of taking a business or conceptual data model (often described in the form of an Entity-Relationship Diagram) and transforming that into a logical representation of that model using the specific semantics of the database management system. In the case of an RDBMS such as Oracle, this representation would be in the form of definitions of relational tables, primary, unique and foreign key constraints and the appropriate column data types supported by the RDBMS.
    Physical database implementation is the process of taking the logical database design and translating that into the actual DDL statements supported by the target RDBMS that will create the database objects in a target RDBMS database. This will generally include specific physical implementation details such as the specification of tablespaces, use of specialised indexing (bitmap, clustered etc), partitioning, compression and anything else that relates to how data will actually be physically stored inside the database.
    It sounds like you already have a physical implementation? If so, you can reverse engineer this implementation into a design tool such as SQL Developer Data Modeller. This will create a logical design by examining the contents of the Oracle data dictionary. Even if you don't have an existing database, Data Modeller is a good tool to use as a starting point for logical and even conceptual/business models.
    If you want to read anything about logical design, "An Introduction to Database Systems" by Date is always a good starting point. "Database Systems - A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation and Management" by Connolly & Begg is also an excellent reference.

  • Help with a database design for community housing project

    Talking database design
    Hi all, I have been wondering about the design of tables for a big block of residential units. There are 100 + rooms. there are about 25 houses in this complex but the 100 + rooms are all rented out separately.
    Its just like a college campus really but its not a college campus , its a little unique.
    The rents are applied as a percentage of income, so thats not common, so I included a tblRoomCost where the pre-calculated weekly cost is entered, and its got a date field in there for when the change of rent charged. I probably need to include an income field in tblCustomer, even just as an Admin reference.
    So is this looking pretty ok and would there be any point in scrapping the database and using text files ?
    So what do you think of these tables please ?
    tblCustomer
    pkCustomer, fldFirstName, fldLastname
    tblRoomAllocation
    pkRoomID, fkCustomer
    tblRoomCost
    pkRoomID, fldDate, fldRoomCost
    tblTransactionID
    pkTransactionID, fldDate, fldTransactionType, fkCustomer, fldAmount

    The naming scheme is one I learned and havn't thought past it though I do get into trouble and your suggestion may prove useful when codeing !
    I thought the tblRoomAllocation and tblRoomCost took care of changing. Though I see now that tbleRoomAllocation needs a Date field really. And the tblRoomCost has a fldRoomCost which isnt really that good an implementation as the rooms themselves are priced always accoedijng to the income of a resident and not because of the room. So the real world object is getting fudgy........
    It is extremely unlikly that Admin would ever allow two rooms to be rented by an individual.
    I will have a look at possibly your suggestion that an Accounts table be used.
    Also I thought about having a startDate and EndDate in the tblTransaction to represent the period being paid for. Just seems like a lot of Dates in a transaction table. One to record the transaction, the other two dates to indicate the period that was actually being paid for. ? When perhaps I should work that out in the runtime code.v ? This will be a VB.Net app.
    Do you think there is a need for Accounts table if only one room is permitted to be rented , though room changing may be common?
    And thx for your input.
    Message was edited by:
    user521381

  • New database design product - ModelRight for Oracle

    Whether you are a beginner or an expert data modeler, ModelRight for Oracle is the database design tool of choice for Oracle. Here are some of the things that make ModelRight for Oracle unique:
    •     Extensive support for Oracle – support and advanced features - OR types, object tables, object views, materialized views, index-organized tables, clusters, partitions, function-based indexes, etc...
    • full Forward, Reverse and Compare capabilities
    •     Unique User Interface and Diagrammatic elements: with our mode-less and hyperlinked user-interface, navigating and editing your model is intuitive and easy.
    •     Extensive use of Domains: you can create Domains for just about every type of object to propagate patterns, reusability & classification.
    •     Unprecedented level of programmatic control: you can control the smallest details of the FE and Alter Script generation process.
    Please check out our website at http://www.modelright.com and download the free trial version.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments.
    Thank you,
    Tim Guinther
    Founder, ModelRight, Inc.
    [email protected]
    (215) 534 5282

    Excellent product. Pretty impressive. Gorgeous diagrams and sophisticated reports. Loved the myriad of navigation ways and non-obtrusive modeless dialogs. Very easy to use!
    Keep the good work up.

  • Doubt in Database Design

    Hi,
    I have got some doubt in database design. I am designing a database for Inventory Management. Wherein i need to store the order details in one to many relationship. I have designed my tables as follows (Just sample)
    -- Tbl_OrderOne
    OrderCode (PK)
    OrderDate
    CustomerInfo
    -- Tbl_OrderMany
    OrderCode (FK)
    ItemCode
    Qty
    What doubt i have got is, since oracle has the features like creating objects and use them as data type and store the data.
    Can i use this feature in this case. Here in this case trasactions will be very high. Does it affect the performance. But presently i have designed it using foreign key reference as i showed you in the beginning. If using the Objects to store that huge number of data is feasible and increases the performance, then i can go for Object type feature.
    Thanx in Advance
    Regards
    Vinayak
    null

    Vinayak,
    One more thing. You can check out more information about NESTED TABLE at http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/oracle8i/doc_library/817_doc/appdev.817/a76976/adobjdes.htm#446526
    Regards,
    Geoff

  • New Oracle database design tool...

    Whether you are a beginner or an expert data modeler, ModelRight for Oracle is the database design tool of choice for Oracle. Here are some of the things that make ModelRight for Oracle unique:
    • Extensive support for Oracle – support and advanced features - OR types, object tables, object views, materialized views, index-organized tables, clusters, partitions, function-based indexes, etc...
    • full Forward, Reverse and Compare capabilities
    • Unique User Interface and Diagrammatic elements: with our mode-less and hyperlinked user-interface, navigating and editing your model is intuitive and easy.
    • Extensive use of Domains: you can create Domains for just about every type of object to propagate patterns, reusability & classification.
    • Unprecedented level of programmatic control: you can control the smallest details of the FE and Alter Script generation process.
    Please check out our website at http://www.modelright.com and download the free trial version.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments.
    Thank you,
    Tim Guinther
    Founder, ModelRight, Inc.
    [email protected]
    (215) 534 5282

    Jens I found a few good links in there...I was trying to
    find if there was a certification track offered in
    DB Design? I see a lot of instructor led classes most
    of them only 2-3 days long.

  • Questions about Database roles

    Hi, 
    Need to setup a new (Windows) user which has varied access to tables, views and procedures in about 8 different schemas all in the same database. 
    I've created a instance level login and then gone to the database to set the more granular details. 
    First question.  Does this user need to own the schemas they will access? 
    Secondly, I'm assumign the best bet would be to create a database role and then apply the privs against that? 
    I need to give access to all stored procedures (and future procedures) in a couple of these schemas and none in the others.  Is it possible to grant execute on all procedures in a schema whist prohibiting others? 
    Then I would assign the database role to the new instance login? 
    Thanks 

    In the database he has access to a number of schemas but I wish to explicitly exclude him from all views in those schemas and in addition to this all the sys catalogs, e.g
    Also have no idea how to restrict access to the user created views without doing them all manually, but then what happens in the future if new views are added? They are not going to be explicitly denied. 
    David nailed the problem.
    There is no way to differentiate SELECT permission between Tables and Views. If they are all in the same schema and tables are allowed and views not.. out of luck and have to include the allowed object one by one (as opposed to denying the not allowed ones
    with the risk of missing some in the future)
    This is why database design should have security in mind from the very beginning and views, being a way to access (aka "access-schema") data in tables should ideally be placed in a separate schemas
    Andreas Wolter (Blog |
    Twitter)
    MCM - Microsoft Certified Master SQL Server 2008
    MCSM - Microsoft Certified Solutions Master Data Platform, SQL Server 2012
    www.andreas-wolter.com |
    www.SarpedonQualityLab.com

  • Database design for swapping/trading items between companies

    What is the best SQL table schema for items being swapped/traded between companies? For instance:
    e.g.1 If company A wants to swap item 0001 (owned by customer X but being managed by company A) with company B who is offering item 0002 (owned by customer Y but being managed by company B) and item 0003 (owned by customer Z but being managed by company B)
    e.g.2 If company A wants to swap item 0004 (owned by customer X but being managed by company A) with company B who is offering item 0005 (owned by customer Y but being managed by company B)
    These are the tables I have so have so far, it should be good enough to support 1 to 1 trades but not too sure about 1..* to 1..* (many to many) trades, is it correct or can it be improved further?
    Note: Trades can only happen between two companies, but they could trade as many items as they wish.
    Trade
    id: int (primary key)
    company1_id: int (foreign key)
    company2_id: int (foreign key)
    datetime: string
    status: string
    TradeDetail
    id: int (primary key)
    trade_id: int (foreign key)
    item_id: int (foreign key)
    Company
    id: int (primary key)
    name: string
    address: string
    phone: string
    email: string
    rating: int
    Customer
    id: int (primary key)
    f_name: string
    s_name: string
    dob: string
    address: string
    phone: string
    email: string
    Item
    id: int (primary key)
    customer_id: int (foreign key)
    company_id: int (foreign key)
    price: double

    I made a few changes.
    You need to think about NATURAL KEY for each table.  For example, what is the NATURAL KEY for the Customer table. It can be:
    CompanyTaxID char(9) NOT NULL UNIQUE
    or
    SSNO char(9) NOT NULL UNIQUE
    Trade
    id: int (primary key)
    company1_id: int (foreign key)
    company2_id: int (foreign key)
    datetime: datetime
    unique(company1_id, company2_id, datetime)
    status: string
    TradeDetail
    id: int (primary key)
    trade_id: int (foreign key)
    item_id: int (foreign key)
    Company
    id: int (primary key)
    name: string
    address: string
    phone: string
    email: string
    rating: int
    Customer
    id: int (primary key)
    f_name: string
    s_name: string
    dob: string
    address: string
    phone: string
    email: string
    Item
    id: int (primary key)
    customer_id: int (foreign key)
    company_id: int (foreign key)
    price: decimal(20,2)
    Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
    SQL Server 2014 Database Design
    New Book / Kindle: Beginner Database Design & SQL Programming Using Microsoft SQL Server 2014

  • Database design for Help Desk application.

    Hello does any one know
    Database design for Help Desk application.
    ERD
    Business rules and features
    ?

    The best way to approach a database design is to write a
    specification for the application. Document what processes the help
    desk technicians will do. In the process, identify what pieces of
    information they work with. When you have the complete
    specification written, you can then begin grouping the pieces of
    information they work with together. For example, a ticket may have
    a number, status, priority and a person to whom it is assigned. The
    person to whom the ticket is assigned will have a name, phone
    number, e-mail address and a list of technical skills.
    So in this overly-simplified example, we could have a table
    that contains ticket information, a table that has information
    about technicians and a table of skills. Then ask your self
    questions like "Can one ticket be handled by more than one
    technician?" "Can one technician handle more than one ticket?" Can
    a technician have more than one skill?" In this way, you can begin
    seeing the one-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relationships
    that exist.

  • Database Design for Multiple function site

    Hi
    I am working on one project which involve multiple function
    site, such as
    Company Product Catelog, Customer Support Forum, Document
    Exchange Engine and
    etc...
    Normally we will combine ALL TABLEs into one DATABASE.
    My question are:
    1) Is my break them to individual DATABASE, will it perform
    better?
    Means Product Catelog and Forum will have different
    DATABASE, but they
    will using the same DOMAIN NAME.
    2) I am worried about the break down and corruption of
    DATABASE, so I have the
    idea to separate them out. Are my idea correct or wrong?
    3) I am seeking for better DATABASE DESIGN, because I know
    the database will
    become huge in future. I request for your idea and opinion.
    Thank you very much.

    Creating views: not an option I think. It would involve a lot of programming with 'instead of' triggers etc.
    Seperate databases: a good way if the locations are completely independant and do not share information. This involves more DBA work.
    Separate schema's in one database: this would make public synonyms impossible, and is probably not a good option.
    Adding a location id to tables: the best way I think, and flexible. You can easily add another location, and locations can easily share information.

  • Database design for multiple users/connections

    Hello All,
    My questions are about overall design/strategy of the database.
    We are using Oracle 9.2.0 on AIX as a backend for a ColdFusion application. When deployed, the CF app and Oracle will be running on our customer's server, with the customer's various physical locations accessing the server remotely. The customer will manage the oracle database on their server.
    With the potential for approximately 70 locations remotely accessing the database at the same time, each remote location will only be selecting and updating their own records out of any table -- i.e. each record contains an indexed "location id" -- although inserting would be a different story.
    Would creating views provide the data manipulation performance the users would need? Or perhaps individual schemas with individual tables/indexes for each location id? Or should we consider separate databases?
    Does anybody have any ideas or practical suggestions about how to approach this? Are there other considerations that we should be thinking about?
    Please let me know if I have not provided enough information. Your comments/criticisms are greatly appreciated.
    Louise

    Creating views: not an option I think. It would involve a lot of programming with 'instead of' triggers etc.
    Seperate databases: a good way if the locations are completely independant and do not share information. This involves more DBA work.
    Separate schema's in one database: this would make public synonyms impossible, and is probably not a good option.
    Adding a location id to tables: the best way I think, and flexible. You can easily add another location, and locations can easily share information.

  • SIMPLE Database Design Problem !

    Mapping is a big problem for many complex applications.
    So what happens if we put all the tables into one table called ENTITY?
    I have more than 300 attributeTypes.And there will be lots of null values in the records of that single table as every entityType uses the same table.
    Other than wasting space if I put a clustered index on my entityType coloumn in that table.What kind of performance penalties to I get?
    Definition of the table
    ENTITY
    EntityID > uniqueidentifier
    EntityType > Tells the entityTypeName
    Name >
    LastName >
    CompanyName > 300 attributeTypes
    OppurtunityPeriod >
    PS:There is also another table called RELATION that points the relations between entities.

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    check the coloumn with WHERE _entityType='PERSON'
    as there is is clustered index on entityType...there
    is NO performance decrease.
    there is also a clustered index on RELATION table on
    relationType
    when we say WHERE _entityType ='PERSON' or
    WHERE relationType='CONTACTMECHANISM'.
    it scans the clustered index first.it acts like a
    table as it is physically ordered.I was thinking in terms of using several conditions in the same select, such as
    WHERE _entityType ='PERSON'
      AND LastName LIKE 'A%' In your case you have to use at least two indices, and since your clustered index comes first ...
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Have you ever thought of using constraints in your
    modell? How would you realize those?
    ...in fact we did.We have arranged the generic object
    model in an object database.The knowledge information
    is held in the object database.So your relational database is used only as a "simple" storage, everything has go through your object database.
    But the data schema is held in the RDBMS with code
    generation that creates a schema to hold data.If you think that this approach makes sense, why not.
    But in able to have a efficent mapping and a good
    performance we have thought about building only one
    table.The problem is we know we are losing some space
    but the thing is harddisk is much cheaper than RAM
    and CPU.So our trade off concerated on the storage
    cost.But I still wonder if there is a point that I
    have missed in terms performance?Just test your approach by using sufficiently data - only you know how many records you have to store in your modell.
    PS: it is not wise effective using generic object
    models also in object databases as CPU cost is a lot
    when u are holding the data.I don't know if I'd have taken your approach - using two database systems to hold data and business logic.
    PS2: RDBMS is a value based system where object
    databases are identity based.we are trying to be in
    the gray area of both worlds.Like I wrote: if your approach works and scales to the required size, why not? I would assume that you did a load test with your approach.
    What I would question though is that your discussing a "SIMPLE Database Design" problem. I don't see anything simple in your approach when it comes to implementation.
    C.

  • Where to learn about database tuning from?

    Hello,
    I need to learn more about database tuning - practical aspect. Are there any sites/services that could help me? I can't use production environment of course, I need to prepare my own ones (Oracle DBs on linux and windows too) and workload too. How to simulate workload from many users?
    Thanks in advance for help
    Aliq

    How do you learn to paint? You can read every book on the subject, attend lectures by famous artists on paints and brushes and styles and what not..
    None of this will turn you into an artist that can paint. Theory only goes that far.
    And this is as true in performance tuning as in painting. You need to run into that brick wall called experience over and over again - and each time learn hard lessons that no theory can ever teach.
    If performance tuning was that easy, we would have had fully automated tuning software in operating systems and database systems that could detect and fix all our performance woes on the fly.
    Does not work like that.
    Also, performance tuning is many times seen as an "after the fact" thing. Design the system. Code the software. Implement it. Then tune it.
    Wrong. Also does not work like that.
    Performance tuning begins at the very first workshop when brainstorming the basic design of the system. If performance and scalability are not part of that process, they cannot easily (if at all) be made to be part of the final system as a tuning exercise.
    If I need to pass a single fundamental "uber-alles" principle for performance tuning - when dealing with it after the fact (as many of us do), then it is:
    Identify The Problem
    Do not confuse symptoms as the actual problem.
    PS. Performance tuning is also many time (IMO) a situation where you have lost. Why? Because of if the code was designed and coded correctly, then there would not have been a performance issue. If the Oracle architecture was understood correctly, there would not be a problem. Which makes the advice by the other 2 posters so important. Understand Oracle. Understand how to design and code in Oracle. If done well, what is there left to performance tune?

  • Database Design in JDeveloper

    Hi,
    In JDeveloper 10.1.3.1 (existing) database can be imported (I red about it in Oracle Magazine by Steve Muench). I selected some existing tables and printed these. This works fine and looks good on paper.
    I was wondering how trigger-code, functions, procedures can be imported (or created) in JDeveloper. Also, can I add storage information like tablespaces to objects?
    I would like to use JDeveloper as database-design tool (therefore I need some basic 'designer' functionality)
    Thanks,
    Stephan

    Thanks. I read the documents, interesting!
    From my 'Connections' page I can create a trigger. Thats fine.
    But imagine I do not have a database yet. I want to start from scratch and first create a new table having a simple trigger on it. I go to the 'Applications' page and in the 'Database Design' I drag a table from pallete. This works fine. But, how to add a trigger to this table??
    Thanks,
    Stephan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adobe Muse CC 2014 no text effects installed

    I recently updated creative cloud cc2014 and the old version of Adobe Muse I have the text effect panel and now CC 2014 I can't even find my text effect (shadow and all that) Can anyone please help.  Thank you CJ

  • Why can I not open Yahoo Mail in Firefox but can in IE?

    I have recently updated my Firefox to 5.0. Now I cannot open my Yahoo mail box. The landing page downloads and I can see my email title, but when I click to open the email the link is dead. None of the features on the Yahoo mail page works. Everythin

  • Clicking a button returns a user to the last slide he/she visitied

    Is there a way in Captivate to create a button that will return a user to the last slide he/she visited instead of going back to a previous slide?

  • Update 10.1.9 broke my Acrobat 10 (Mac) - Boo!

    I normally install all updates, both Apple and Adobe. I'm still on OS 10.8.5 (ML). Acrobat update 10.1.9 broke my Acrobat X Pro. Here's what no longer works: Save As --> Reduced File Size - freezes, never completes - This is critical for the work I d

  • Updating the table using excel sheet

    hello friends i have exported the tabel EINA in to a excel sheet , and made changes , now i want to upload same excel sheet into same table and update the change value into table , how can i do this??? regards ravikant dewangan