AC 5.3 RAR - combined risk analysis reports for regular auth. and SPM auth.
Dear All,
we have users that have regular day-today authorization and also FF authorization.
Does the Batch Risk Analysis takes into account both authorizations when doing the risk analysis for those users ? will we see it in the reports ?
Thanks
Yudit
ok, so basically the answer is no, in the RAR components we do not have risk analysis for the combinations of the roles assigned to the user and to his FF ID.
in that case, at what stage does the system checks for those combined risks ?
is it checked when we manage the risk analysis phase in the CUP request that is asking to assign the FF ID to the user ?
thanks
Yudit
Similar Messages
-
Role Based Risk Analysis Report
Hello All,
When I executed the Risk Analysis report for a role with SOD Risk Level = ALL and Report type = SOD at Authorization Object level, the results come back as "NO CONFLICT FOUND". this is the correct response.
However, I executed the Risk Analysis report for the same role with SOD Risk Level = HIGH and Report type = SOD at Authorization Object level, the results come back SOD conflicts based on the conflicting transactions. Is there a bug with analyzing roles using this option?
Also, when I click on the Detail Report button, I received object data that does not appear correct.
Please Help. Thanks.
Edited by: Michael Johnson on Apr 8, 2009 8:54 PMHi Babiji,
Are you using any specific tools for SOD's? If you are using GRC tool, then it can be done using compliance calibrator Role level Risk analysis.In addition to what Sneha has said,
To find out the conflicting roles in CC version 5.2 the path is INFORMER->Risk Analysis->Role level.In Virsa 4.0 you have the option of carrying out risk anaysis at role level by executing the t-code /N/VIRSA/ZVRAT.
In section Analysis type, choose Roles and enter the list of roles.
In section SOD Risk level, choose the appropriate risk.
Then choose the appropriate report type and report format before executing it.
This will display all the roles with the levels of risk associated with it and then you can mitigate these as per your organizational policies & procedures.
Thanks,
Saby.. -
Ad hoc Risk Analysis report is returning incorrect Risk Level for some Risks
We are running GRC AC 10.0 with SP 16. After application of Support Pack 16, some of our ad hoc risk analysis reports are returning incorrect risk levels. For example: Risk F024 Open closed periods and inappropriately post currency or tax entries is set as High. When the Ad hoc report is run, the risk F024 will show on a user with a level of Medium. We have generated our ruleset and have followed the normal procedures used to implement the support pack. Any ideas what is causing this issue? I have exhausted my knowledge and search attempts.
Any help is appreciated.
Sara B.Hi Kevin
Many thanks for your post, we did run a full BRA but no luck unfortunately. Some Risks still reporting as Medium when they should be Critical or High. Oddly it is reporting correctly against some risks just not for all!
Cheers
Hussain -
Issue with risk analysis report in GRC10.0
Hi All,
We are running the user risk analysis report from NWBC: Reports and Analytics -> Access Risk Analysis Reports -> User Risk Violation report.
This report is not fetching all the data even though user has all the required authorizations.
We are getting the data when we execute the dashboard reports.
Any one has idea?
Cheers
HariAlessandro,
Thanks for the reply. I am aware of this.
Problem is when dash board report is showing the risk for the user but risk anaylsis report in Reports and Analytics is not showing the risks to that user.
As per our investigation, the risk data that is displaying in the risk anaylsis report in Reports and Analytics is incomplete. We didn't find any errors in SLG1. Also there is no issues from authorizations side.
Regards
Hari -
Risk analysis Report Error in GRC AC 10.0
Dear GRC,
I had problem with Risk analysis Report in GRC Access Request form
When i run the Risk analysis report on Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing as "No Violations" but if i run the Risk analysis report only on Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing too many Violations.
I maintained Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level as default risk analysis type in SPRO Configuration Parameters settings.
i am not understanding why system behaves like this. Could you please help me on this.
System Details : GRC AC 10.0 , SP-12
Thanks a lot for swift response.
Best Regards,
RKHi GRC Team,
Please help me on this. I am waiting for your replay.
Regards,
KR -
Risk analysis reports in IDM 6.0
Hi
I was trying to run risk analysis report to detect deleted users in Red hat linux. I was not sure what report to run. I tried various things like user report, resource accoutn report etc. However these reports gave the the list of users deleted in IDM but not the resource. Can i somehow create a customized report to do this?
Any help regarding this matter is appreciated
Thanks
ManHi,
Please check following path in easy access
1) Accounting ->Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling ->Product Cost Planning ->Information System
2) Accounting ->Financial Accounting ->Fixed Assets ->Information System
Best Regards,
Madhu -
Hello Experts,
What is main difference between Risk Analysis Report Formats ....
Summary
Detail
Management Summary
Executive Summary
Please explain in depth and which scenarios we are using these reports. Please give a one business example.
Regards,
BabuDear Babu,
trying to help you.
Summary: gives you an overview of conflicts on action level. Can be used to discuss with business what is causing the risk.
Detail: gives you an overview of conflicts on authorization level. Can be used to analyze how a conflict can be removed.
Management summary: gives you an overview of risks on user level. Can be used to report how many risks are currently in the system on user level. E.g. userA has 3 risks, userB has 2 risks, etc.
Executive Summary: gives you an overview of risks on risk level. Can be used to have a general overview of applicable risks in the system. E.g. riskA has no conflicts, riskB has 7 conflicts, etc.
Best if you just analyze and you will see the differences. If you have a particular question do not hesitate to contact us.
Regards,
Alessandro -
GRC_10 Risk Analysis Report
Hi,
i should extend the risk analysis report with more details from diffrent tables, they hold special role details.
I havent found an idea how to do this.
Could i extend the standard report for risk analysis with more columns?
Is there something like user.exits or enhancement-points?
thank you very much indeed
best regards
AlexHi Alex,
did you have a chance to look at standard SAP Help information about different types of reports and information available?
If not yet -please take a look at:
Risk Analysis Reports - SAP GRC Access Control - SAP Library
What exactly information you would like to add to reports?
Standard reports can by customized by adding some additional fields which are hidden in standard view.
There is also an option to add custom fields and data,
Lets us know,
Filip -
Cost Analysis Report - For a range of process orders
Dear all,
Is there a standard report available to get the cost analysis for a range of process order? COR3 --> Go to --> Cost --> Analysis. Here I can see the cost analysis for one report. But I wanted to get the cost analysis report for a range of process orders. Please help.
Thanks
NagarajanDear
You can use cost analysis report like
1.S_ALR_87099932 - Variances Between Costing Runs
2.S_ALR_87099931 - Price vs Cost Estimate
3.S_ALR_87099932 - Variances Between Costing Runs
5.KOC4
Regards
JH -
Analysis report for standard cost in CK33N
Hi,
Analysis report for standard cost
Using variant Z003 in CK11N.
Planned cost 3 is the output used for planning and this is adjusted by making changes to the BOM throughout the process
In CK33 you compare the 2011 cost for the product with the proposed cost for the next year. For some parts it works and for others it splits the lines, though the calculation is still correct.
Regards,
T.Harish KumarHi Revital,
I believe the last option is correct.
Thanks,
Gordon -
No data in Application failure Analysis report for a particular application alone.
Dear All,
We are not able to get the data in Application Failure Analysis report from Appadvisor for a particular application(say ABC) alone, whereas it works fine for different application. Also,we could get the data from other reports(such
as Application status,Problem distribution analysis,etc) for the same application(ABC). PFB snapshot for your reference.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Rajesh Kumar CHi,
Is there any error message when you run Application Failure Analysis report for the specific application?
Does this application have any failure alerts?
You may also look into operation manager even logs to check is there any errors or warnings.
Regards,
Yan Li
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected] -
Hi All,
I have to create a Age analysis report for FI documents
which have line items with posting key 75 & 70 (Asset)
Given logic is
1 Selection screen has parameters - Company code, Key date
2 Need to take all line items with posting key 70 & 75
(BSEG-BSCHL = 70 or 75)
Layout of report is
Asset no 0-30 31-60 61-90 91-120 . 151-360 (days)
80000003 2000.00 3000.00 1000.00 4000.00 7000.0
80000006 1000.00 5000.00 300.00 5000.00 4000.0
Local curency amount should be categorised under the days
diferences between key date (selection screen) & posting date
of the accounting document.
My problem is,
Posting date of the document is not in the BSEG table. It is
in the BKPF table.Therefore I have to extract all FI documents(Not only documents with posting key 75 or 70) within 360 days from Key date in BKPF the table.
I cannot join BSEG & BKPF. Because, BSEG table is a cluster table.
Can you please tell me the way how can i extract the data for this report with out any performance issues.
PraGreat idea, but I dont think it is going to work.
The 1st problem should be, how do you work out the key date... You will need some good code for that.
Have a look at the customer aged debt reports for some help.
After that, if you just want asset documents, do they have their own unique document type, if so, you could use the doc type from BKPF to reduce the number you want to select in BSEG.
Have you looked at any of the standard Asset dep reports, perhaps there is something there you could use. -
Aging Analysis Reports for Inventories & Receivables
Hello,
Can any one answer me how to get aging analysis reports for inventories & receivables in SAp R3 system?
Thanking You,
Regards
Santosh Rothehi
the age analysis report format should be like
Material list | 0 - 3 months | 3 - 6 Months | 6 - 12 months | above 1 year|
M1 10 50 0 0 pc
M2 0 0 12 10 Kg
etc .
Pls suggest the suitable T.code or step for configuring to get in the above report format
Regards
Santosh Rothe -
Report for daily production and daily sales quantities
Can you Please any body let me know what fields and tables should I pick to generate a report for sales qty and production qty for a material on daily basis. we are using PP PI
Hi,
You can use table MSEG for that purpose. Try BUDAT-MKPF as one of the selection parameters and use
MBLNR-MKPF = MBLNR-MSEG
MJHAR-MKPF = MJHAR-MSEG
Sort the results in ERFMG-MSEG and ERFME-MSEG using
BWART-MSEG = 101 minus 102 (for production)
SOBKS-MSEG = E
BWART-MSEG = 601 minus 602 (for sales).
Above stuff might be useful to you for your development requirement provided you are having Sales Order specific production.
Thanks & Regards,
Abu Arbab A -
Report for Asset number and its Purahcse order number
Hello Friends,
Please give me details of report for Asset number and its Purchase order number .
Regards
Nilesh Vakilhi,
GO to ME2N...
use SHIFT + F4..
there check for the acc. assign cata. field and input the asset and execute..
Regards
Priyanka.P
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to I get on to page 2 when my document stops at the page 1 layout line and won't go on to another page?
-
READ_LINKS_OF_BINRELS instead of SREL_GET_NEXT_RELATIONS
I am updating a report from 4.7 to 5.0, and I learned that function module SREL_GET_NEXT_RELATIONS will not work for me in 5.0. I am trying to use cl_binary_relation=>read_links_of_binrels instead, and then call FM SO_OBJECT_READ. In code for 4.7 I u
-
I can swipe slideshow images but can I swipe pages in tablet version
I can swipe slideshow images but can I swipe pages in tablet version
-
Trouble with photos pasting to image contact in addressbook
When I try to paste a photo onto the image box for my contacts in addressbook while on MacBook Pro, it only stays for 3 seconds, then disappears. I'm not sure why the photo doesn't stay. But if I take a picture with my iphone 4s, the photo will stay
-
Hi, looking for pointers from anybody please! I have a library of 7,000-odd photo's , and I'm working through it refininf the location details of each photo. Recently upgraded to iPhoto 11, and I can't seem to amend the location of a photo... I highl