Account Payment Distribution

I have a scenario  where  SAP should  have a customer account in the name of CGHS central office. While receivables will be accounted under various offices when claim is made, collection will come from central account. After receiving into central acct, the company finance team have to do transfer posting to various accts based on the details they receive with payment.
For monitoring receivables and claims, they should look at all CGHS accounts, for which you should give a group acct identifier in the customer master so that in the report, all those balances can be grouped and analysed.
How this can be achieved
Please Suggest

Hi,
Have you gone through consolidated BP function?
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

  • Payment Distribution to Artists by per user plays, rather than total plays

    Hello!
    I just had a thought about how payment is distributed to artists that I wanted to see if anyone might have some thoughts on. Spotify still does come under criticism on occasion for artist payment distribution - I've seen a couple of instances of people citing iTunes as providing more monetary compensation to artists since it is per download, rather than per play, among other things. This seems to be especially true for independent artists, and artists who are generally less well-known.
    I was wondering if Spotify has ever considered doing payment distributions using the
         sum[ (total artist streams per user) / (total streams per user) ] across all users
    ratio for payment calculation, rather than the currently used
         (total artist streams across Spotify) / (total streams across Spotify)
    approach, i.e. calculating the artists' play ratio by user, rather than in one giant pool. If you have considered this, I would love to hear why the current payment implementation was chosen rather than a per user method, such as the one listed above. But... 
    If a per user method has not been considered by Spotify previously, I think it would be nice - while I'm not an analyst myself, I imagine that it could lead to more revenue for independent artists, and maybe even less famous artists that are still beholden to rights owners for distribution of payment. I think it would do this because it could account for differences in number of plays per user - rather than users who tend to play more music over the course of a month contributing more all artists' payout, each user has an equal voice in how money gets distributed to artists.
    I understand that such a switch would be difficult, and possibly insurmountable in the instance of free users - so, I am positing this as an idea not for all users, but for Premium users only. With Premium, it is a feasible goal, since you have a finite number of plays, and a finite amount of money coming directly from that user, and do not have to worry about trying to calculate differences in advertisement impact for different users. Doing that ratio calculation would be relatively straightforward of a switch computationally (though quite a large change in the system nonetheless, of course). 
    I think this type of change would empower both users and artists to use Spotify more. Firstly, it would empower artists to allow Spotify to play their music because the metrics they would get per month would be more reflective of the size of their fan base, and how much importance that fan base puts on the artists' music than current metrics.
    Secondly, it would empower users more, which I think is especially important for users between 18-32 years of age. While I am not an expert on the subject, I often find that users in this age group (my age group) care a great deal about having control over where their money ends up, which in this case means knowing which rights holders and/or artists are getting the money they are spending. I know I do. Switching to this system, while still not addressing the injustices that are felt within the relationship between rights holders and artists by many, would still allow users to have more of a say in who gets their money than the current system. On top of that, it might be helpfult for Spotify itself - if using Premium is the only way for users to feel empowered by knowing how their money is distributed, it may encourage people in the free tier to upgrade to Premium in order to feel empowered.
    Just a thought. I'd love to hear what you and others have to say about this idea. 

    @Merik thanks for the warm welcome, and for the quick, informative response!
    I had the chance to take a look at that page you linked to before my original post, and saw that paragraph you quoted, as well as the bullet point about paid users having a higher "per stream" rate. I guess what I was more interested in (and perhaps this is not the right place to ask this question?) was if there was more of an in-depth "why" behind their decision (and thanks again for linking to it!) documented anywhere that I might be able to read more about. Maybe I was missing something on that page (and please let me know if so!), but the only "why" that I could find was a sentence in the paragraph you quote above:
    "We believe, however, that our service and the lives of artists will both be best if the World’s music fans enjoy more music than ever before in a legal, paid manner".
    While it's great to see their opinion, I was more curious about the line of reasoning behind that position is all. Because I do wonder whether empowering premium users to have more fine-grained control over how their money is allocated, such as by doing pay "per user", might lead to both more paid users and more revenue for independent and/or lesser-known artists - and if that's something that Spotify has researched already, I would love to hear more about the pros and cons behind such an approach!
    Thanks!

  • How to block on account payment for certain user

    Dear All,
       We are looking to implement a policy on how to block certain users not to be able to take on account payment. One more query is it possible to disable a field. I want to disable the field "Payment on account" in the Incoming Payments. Please advice

    Hi,
    Sue below code in transaction notification procedure,Change userid =1 to user id for user ou want to block payment on account
    IF @Object_type = N'24' and @transaction_type = N'A'
    BEGIN
    if exists (SELECT    ORCT.DocEntry from ORCT
                         WHERE (ORCT.PayNoDoc='Y' and ORCT.UserSign=1) and ORCT.DocEntry  = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
    begin
            select @error =14
       select @error_message = 'Cannot make on account payments '
    end
    END
    Thanks,
    Neetu

  • How to make On Account Payment

    Hi all,
    How to make On Account Payment.
    What is the difference between On Account Payment and Down Payment
    Thanks

    Hi Siva,
    Normall on account payment is a payment which is not against any invoice/bill.
    In SAP, we take such scenarios throught the down payment cycle. Downpayment is nothing but advance issued to a  vendor which is not against any invoice/bill.
    So we can say that on account payment in SAP is handled through Down payment (advance).
    Tcodes wrt vendors:
    F-47 - Request
    F-48 - Down Payment
    Tcodes wrt customers:
    F-37 - Request
    F-29 - Down Payment
    Regards,
    Kiran

  • How do I cancel, modify, or update my checking account payment on the day (today) it was made to my Verizon account?

    This morning, after viewing my bank account status that indicated a little over 218 in my account, I made a payment on my Verizon account of 148.82. At the end of this initial payment to my Verizon account, I was told “You may cancel a checking account payment on the day it posts to your account. The amount will be reversed from your account balance.”
    I revisited my bank account a little later, to see if this payment had been posted. It had not, but the current status had then changed due to an auto-payment on another account that I had forgotten about, leaving my account with a balance of only 116. I need to change or reverse my payment to Verizon and submit it for 110 until Tuesday of next week (03 June 2014).
    I've called Verizon billing department, but have been unable to reach a representative due to the high volume of calls, and the call was disconnected. If I am unable to rectify this today, my payment to Verizon will cause charges to my bank account of $40.00 and a late fee to my Verizon account.
    The on-line website does not have a provision for it that I can locate. How can I do this???
    Thanks for the automated contact service that is not well thought out from the user perspective, for efficient customer or public use.  I find this to be most typically within most companies that provide an automated service for their clients.

    Can I view and/or cancel a pending payment?Yes, to view and/or cancel a scheduled one-time payment:
    Go to the Pay Bill page in My Verizon.
    Click Scheduled Payment to view the pending payment on your account.
    If you’d like to cancel the payment, follow the onscreen prompts to cancel it.
    You’ve successfully canceled your payment.
    Back to top
    What if I need to stop a payment that has already been made?If you want to cancel a payment that has already been made, please contact your bank or credit card company to see if the payment or charge to your account can be stopped.
    Note: If you made an online payment through your checking account, you may be able to cancel that payment online from the Payment History page in My Verizon.
    Click on the Cancel link next to the payment, if one is available, and follow the onscreen prompts to cancel the payment.
    If the link isn’t available, the payment isn’t eligible to be canceled online.The option to cancel is typically only available until midnight on the same day the payment was made.
    From: Pay Bill FAQs | Verizon Wireless

  • I want to change my account payment method to none and I do not have a credit card yet.Plus, iTunes gave a message saying that I need to review my account and when I go there,the none payment method is hidden.

    I want to change my account payment method to none and I do not have a credit card yet.Plus, iTunes gave a message saying that I need to review my account and when I go there,the none payment method is hidden.

    Assuming that you want help and that you aren't just copying-and-pasting that thread's title and posting a link to it, then have you tried the steps on the post that I linked to in my first reply on that thread ?
    If you don't get the 'none' option when trying those instructions then you will need to enter credit card details before you will be able to use the account - when you've entered credit card details you should get the 'none' option and be able to remove your card details.
    Or you can create a new account, and follow, exactly, the steps on this page when creating it' : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2534

  • Discounts at Payment Distribution

    Hi
    We are implementing an IS-H project with payment distribution, my client needs to make discounts before billing ( with VK11 for example), but valid only for one of the case payers. How is it possible to have different valid conditions per billing document.
    What if I change the copy control's price type, from "G" to "B", to carry out new prices?
    Or delete, with a source code repair, the conditions that I don't want to be valid for the other payers?
    If conditions is not the right way to do it, what else i could do? To create credit memos after billing is not acceptable from the client.
    Thanks in advance
    Stephy Chris

    Hi Stephy,
    I assume that you would like to post the discount for the SP (not IP) in your example, right? I also assume that in general the IP is relevant for pricing, right?
    I guess a solution is rather tricky if you would not apply the discount before you distribute the amounts to the different payers. I think that our current payment distribution method is not really designed to handle this requirement. It really assumes that the total amount of the logical case bill is distributed according to the rules specified. In some country versions of SAP Patient Management we use an alternative approach for coverage which would lead to your desired result, but most likely this alternative approach would not fit in general.
    I wonder whether you could find a solution based on a specific service that you generate (based on some criteria) for the SP in these situations and then define in the contract scheme that this service is always covered by the SP.
    Maybe an SD-based approach could also work, but unfortunately I am not an SD expert.
    Regards
    Claudius

  • Why my account payment method decline

    Why my account payment method decline

    Altafjan wrote:
    Why my account payment method decline
    iTunes Store: Accepted forms of payment
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5552
    If necessary...
    Contact iTunes Customer Service and request assistance
    Use this Link  >  Apple  Support  iTunes Store  Contact

  • Ebay account payment not removed

    I have had my account set up to automatically remove my account payment from my Paypal account for years. It always comes out on the 15th of the month, and here we are at the 20th and it still hasn't been removed. I don't want to have a problem because is hasn't been paid. Anyone else who pays this way having the same issue?

    I called eBay and told them the situation. They told me that because I registered our new credit card on the 13th, they said the payment wouldn't come off automatically on the 15th, not really sure why. I needed to do a one time payment. It would have been nice to be informed of that, I had no idea that changing the back up credit card would be a problem.

  • Account payment does not register

    at end of prepaid account payment process, my credit card payment does not register. Is there some computer setting I should be aware of? This has been happening since the beginning. I just want to pay online or easily without having to drive to a store - and can't do it.

        Hello MGri,
    It's important to be able to process your payments conveniently! Since you've been having this issue since your online account was set up, we need to ensure that your account is set properly for this option. Our PrePay Team is available to ensure your account is set up properly for online payments. You can reach them directly at 888-294-6830. Please let us know if you need anything further.
    TanishaS1_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • Getting error message when adding on account payment in Outgoing Payments

    Hi,
    We are getting error message "No Matching records found 'Sales Tax Authorities Type' (OSTT) (ODBC - 2028) [ Message 131 - 183]" when we are trying to add account payment in Outgoing Payments. We are not getting any errors while adding customer payments or vendor payments. Please give us the solution. 
    Version : SAP 2007B SP:00 PL:00
    Thanks,
    Sravan Kumar Pothu

    Hi Jeyakanthan,
    Thanks for your immediate reply.
    Actually in outgoing payments there is no tax code selection available. Just we simply selecting the account on which we are making payment and amount( in payment means we are giving cheque details). When trying to add it is giving above said error. Kindly let me know if you have any solution.
    Thanks,
    Sravan Kumar Pothu

  • Withholding Tax on "On Account Payments"

    Hi Experts,
    I've an issue in the following scenario;
    In F-58 I select the indicator for "on account payments" and post the payment after entering the other details.  The payment is posted but without Withholding tax deduction.  In vendor master data withholding tax details are present but the tax is not deducted unlike normal payment of invoices.
    I know SAP transfers WHT code from vendor master to invoice and then it is deducted in payments, but the client wants WHT deductions on "On account Payments".
    I would be grateful if someone may tell me any a way to deduct WHT without ABAP modification  in this scenario.
    Regards,

    Many thanks to all you for the replies, and sorry for a little late response.
    Dear Marssel, I've checked all the configuration settings of Extended WHT.  I do have the documentation as well.  All the processes of WHT are working perfectly (WHT deductions on payments, Advance payments, exemptions, reporting, certificates, challans etc.) except for "On Account Payment" in F-58.
    Dear  Jigar,  I've checked the field status of all the relavent GL accounts and these are fine.
    Dear  Sanil, The WHT Type is off course assigned to the Company Code.
    I would appreciate if you guy's could check the following procedure in your system and give me your feed back, if WHT is deducted or not?
    In F-58 switch on the "on account payment indicator" and post the document.
    Thanks for the support.

  • Documentation about Rule-Based Account Assignment Distribution

    Hello dear PSM Experts,
    In our project (using ECC6), we want to split in a PO the FM account assignment between several lines, according to the fund type of the initial account assignment (based from an referenced earmarked document).
    After looking in the customizing and in ECC6 PSM Public Sector Management
    Release Notes, we are investigating Documentation about Rule-Based Account Assignment Distribution.
    Can anybody provides me a link to a documentation, if any?
    Otherwise, I would greatly appreciate any help to use this functionality.
    Regards,
    François

    Hello,
    I am configuring this functionality currently in an ECC 6.0 environment for a public sector organization and have had an issue with the FMSPLITMAINT transaction.  When attempting to create a rule the 'create' 'copy' 'change' options are not available.
    Configuration has already been completed for Field Profiles, Action Profiles, & Rule Groups.
    The olny documentation I have been able to find was an appendix to the SAP Grants Management - Grantee course.
    Please respond if you there is any additional documentation which may be of assistance.  I have already tried notes: 991661 and 991962.
    Thank you

  • Invoices Adjusted with On Account payment

    HI all,
    what is the query or table to table to take the List of Invoices adjusted on Account Payment,pls tell me the table or query
    Mohamed

    Thanks Girdon
    Here My Scenario For a retail Industry
    1.My Customer Will give advance amount - While will be paid as On Account payment For that Customer
    2.later he will come to Buy Some product , Now i will adjust the Invoice with the Advance amount he paid  by using Internal Reconciliation of SAP Business One
    3. IF the product cost lower than what he has given as advance i wil repay him
    Now My requirement is
    Now i want to print the SALES A/R invoice to him, In that i want to print like this
    Scenario 1: If the A/R Invoice doctotal is more than the Advance amount
    A/R Invoice docTotal  :5000
    Advance Adjusted :4500
    Balance customer need to pay : 500
    Scenario 2: If the A/R Invoice doctotal is less than the Advance amount
    A/R Invoice Doc total :5000
    Advance Adjusted 5500
    Balance We need to pay : 500
    From Where to take how much amount is Adjsuted for a particular Invoice ?What is the table Name
    Regards
    Moahmed

  • My app store account payment security code is not letting me download and get apps

    My app store account payment security code is not letting me download and get apps

    We'll need more details than just "not working". What exactly happens when you try to download an app?

Maybe you are looking for