Documentation about Rule-Based Account Assignment Distribution

Hello dear PSM Experts,
In our project (using ECC6), we want to split in a PO the FM account assignment between several lines, according to the fund type of the initial account assignment (based from an referenced earmarked document).
After looking in the customizing and in ECC6 PSM Public Sector Management
Release Notes, we are investigating Documentation about Rule-Based Account Assignment Distribution.
Can anybody provides me a link to a documentation, if any?
Otherwise, I would greatly appreciate any help to use this functionality.
Regards,
François

Hello,
I am configuring this functionality currently in an ECC 6.0 environment for a public sector organization and have had an issue with the FMSPLITMAINT transaction.  When attempting to create a rule the 'create' 'copy' 'change' options are not available.
Configuration has already been completed for Field Profiles, Action Profiles, & Rule Groups.
The olny documentation I have been able to find was an appendix to the SAP Grants Management - Grantee course.
Please respond if you there is any additional documentation which may be of assistance.  I have already tried notes: 991661 and 991962.
Thank you

Similar Messages

  • How to enhance Rule-based Employee assignment

    Hi,
    we would like to enhance the Rule-based Employee assignment with additional Attributes from the BP Organisational Data.
    Does anyone know, what we need to do?
    Cheers,
    D.H.

    Hello!
    You can maintain Conditions and Actions within the Rule-Modeler. Here there is a context to maintain Rule-Policies related to the Business-Partner.
    Have you already checked the attributes you can use for the Conditions? To my knowledge there are many attributes you can use and have also several options within the actions (not only assigning/removing the Employee, but also Partner-Functions, etc.).
    BTW: The rule-based assignment can be triggered manually by the user within the account/contact overview page, or via scheduled batch program. (Report: CRM_BUPA_ASSIGN_EMPLOYEE)
    Best regards
    Arno

  • How to restrict Service PO type to enter GR based account assignment

    Hi,
    How to restrict Service Based PO document type to enter GR based Account assignment.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    JACK

    Dear Jack,
    Purchase Order Account Assignment For Service Items:
    http://www.sap-img.com/materials/account-assignment.htm
    The concept of account assignment remains same whether for materials with Mat. No. Or only text. 
    If you are purchasing a particular service for a cost center. then you can assign the PO item to Cost Center & so on..... 
    Material Management 
    -> Purchasing 
    -> Material Master 
    -> Entry Aids For Items Without a Material Master.
    Also, visit:
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/maintance-order-not-reading-valuation-area-in-okb9-1018737
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • Multiple Account Assignment Distribution by Percentage in EBP

    Hi Gurus,
    We are in SRM 4 SP13  and ECC 4.6C ,Classic Scenario.The SC creates a PR in the backend and from that  PO subsequently.
    When we are creating a SC with Multiple Account Assignment  and Distribution by Percentage to different cost centres   the PR created  with
    Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
    Partial Invoice : Distribute in Sequence. This is for materials
    But for Services it is created as
    Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
    Partial Invoice :Distribute Proportionally.
    For services Partial Invoice is working fine and for materials it is Picking "Distribute in Sequence"
    Is this a standard behaviour  or any thing to be changed .Please let me know.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Rajesh

    Hi there,
    Standard SRM Hardcodes the partial invoice indicator to Progressive when          
    sending POs to SAP in the Classice Scenario:                                                                               
    SPOOL_PO_READ_BAPI_EXPORTS hard codes the value of po_items-part_inv              
    to 1 that is equivalent to "Progressive fill-up" in R/3 POs & REQ.                                                                               
    It is not possible to create from EBP to backend some PO-documents with           
    multiple account assignment and partial invoice indicator = 2 (which is           
    proportional distribution because there is no possibility to set this             
    indicator on the account assignment creen in EBP and theris no Badi               
    to do it so far. This is a missing functionality from SAP.                                                                               
    You still could use LIV with partial invoice indicator= 1 and then you            
    can change to partial invoice propotional in backend manually.                    
    This is not comfortable but it is possible so far.                                
    You can see in the following code from the mentioned Function how Service and material documents are treated differently
    ======================================                                                                               
    set distr. indicator only for the dummy item for services         
    for material items and the service lines                          
    it is derived from distribution type in EBP                       
        IF next > 1.                                                    
          IF po_items-item_cat = '9' OR                                 
             po_items-item_cat = '1' .                                  
            po_items-distrib = '2'.    "prozentuale Verteilung          
          ENDIF.                                                        
          po_items-part_inv = '1'.      <<<<       Hard Coded to "1"    
          MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
        ELSE.                                                           
          CLEAR po_items-distrib.    "prozentuale Verteilung            
          MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
        ENDIF.                                                          
      ENDLOOP.                                                                               
    CHECK NOT po_items[] IS INITIAL.                                                                               
    ======================================         
    Or possibly use Badi BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
    Hope this points you in the right direction.
    Regards,
    Matthew

  • Multiple Account Assignment -- Distribution

    Hi,
    Details:
    SRM 4.0 system.
    SRM SERVER 500
    when filling in the multiple account assignment, the user can choose the distribution type (percentage, value, quantity). We don't want the users to select a distribution by value. So is it possible to remove this option from the drop down box?
    Best Regards,
    Tom

    Hi Tom,
    You can change it in program LBBP_PDH_ACCF35.
    Here you can see text-024 (value) is appended to the table.
    Just comment this table append.
    Best regards,
    Laurent.

  • Documentation about Chart of Accounts (Group, Operative, Country-spec.)

    Hello,
    I need a documentation (a graphic will be very fine) of the relationship/usage of the three platforms of chart of accounts.
    Group chart of accounts
    Operative chart of accounts
    Local (country-specific) chart of accouts
    At "help.sap.com" i just could find a written one, but as i have to use it in a presentation, a picture/graphic will be much better.
    Thanks in advance,
    Sepp Mayer

    Hi
    If you find any documentation please forward to me. my email id is [email protected]
    Regards
    Uday

  • Multiple account assignment switching between distribution indicators not working for service

    Hi Gurus,
    Account assignment distribution function not working post ECC6 patching activity
    we have recently completed ECC6 patching actvity and we are facing issues on processing multiple account assignment in service.
    we create Purhcase order with single account assignment and will process service with Multiple account assignment selecting distribution on qty or percentage basis till patching functionality works fine post patching we are facing issue when we are selecting distribution indicator system provides an error message switching between distribution indicator is not allowed when we continue system ask to enter in case of multiple account assignment select the distribution indicator. could you please suggest me on the issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    we have found a SAP note
    1915000 - SE685 - Switching between distribution indicators is not allowed
    This is now standard behavior.

  • Rule- Based Assignment of Employees in Service Request

    Hi Expert,
    Please provide step by step guide instructions for rule based in assignment of Employees for service request.
    Thanks
    Best Regards

    This blog should cover your needs: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/18067. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    Regards.

  • Revoked SES with account assignment distributed by quantity cannot be modified or deleted

    Hi All
    I have users who are posting service entry sheet with the account assignment distributed
    on a quantity basis across multiple maintenance orders.  The acceptance works perfectly but we are having problems if a correction or cancellation is required.
    The service acceptance can be revoked successfully but afterwards it is not possible to change the service quantity or to delete the service entry sheet.  When we try we receive an ABAP runtime error:
    Runtime Errors         COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW
    Exception              CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW
    Date and Time          08.07.2014 14:25:12
    Short text
         Overflow during the arithmetical operation (type P) in program
    What happened?
         Error in the ABAP Application Program
         The current ABAP program "CL_EX_MMSRV_ACC_DIST_SAP======CP" had to be
          terminated because it has
         come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    What can you do?
         Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
         To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
         administrator.
         Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
         at and manage termination messages, and you can also
         keep them for a long time.
    Error analysis
         An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
         The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW', was not
          caught in
         procedure "IF_EX_MMSRV_ACC_DIST_SAP~DISTRIBUTE_ACC_ASSIGNMENTS" "(METHOD)", nor
          was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
         Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
         exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
         The reason for the exception is:
         An overflow was discovered in an ongoing arithmetical operation with
         operands of type P. Possible causes are:
         1. The result field of type P is too small for the result.
         2. The result or a intermediate result has more than 31 decimal places.
    This problem does not occur if I run the same scenario any of the following variations so I'm confident the problem is related to the account assignment distribution by quantity:
    Single account assignment
    Distributed account assignment via percentage
    No service acceptance/revoke has been posted
    There are ways to get around the problem but I'm trying to find a SAP Note that may be relevant.  I haven't had any luck yet.  Does this problem ring a bell with anybody who might be able to point me towards an appropriate note?
    Thanks
    Robyn

    Hi,
    Kindly refer the below OSS Note, which explains the reason and correction for the error which you are facing.
    1715475 - MAA2: ML81N/MIRO: false postings for Service PO

  • APO Rule based ATP for RA Repair

    Hey,
    Could you please help me to turn on rule based ATP for document type RA outbound?
    The senario is as follows:
    Customer returns to my company the product.
    My company has multiple locations (plants) for replacement products. I would like to determine the replacement product location with rule-based ATP. We use rule-based ATP for the sales site w/o issues.
    I set up in configuration:
    ZRA (copy of RA) with business transaction RMA(to trigger the rule based ATP)
    Assigned ZRA / Item usage = R104/ PSTYV= ZXNN (item category allows rule based ATP).
    ZRA     ZNO1     R104     IRRA     ZXNN
    I also did the below rules based ATP item catgegory determination:
    AUART        MTPOS         VWPOS        UEPST         PSTYV
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO0     ZTP1     ZXNN
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO1          ZTP1
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO1     ZXNN     ZTP1
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO2     ZTP1     ZXNN
    When I create with VA01 a ZRA order and add a replacement plant then I get this message:
    The ATP rules are not called up for item 000030 - Message no. /SAPAPO/ATP147
    But when I go from the "APO Availability Check" view to the Rule then I see my rules determined.
    The detail message also says that the system "things" the line was already delivered, which is not the case.
    Could you please tell me if it is possible to combine rule-based ATP with the RA replacement process and if yes how to do it?
    Thanks,
    Sabine

    Check OSS Note 571044 - RBA: Use of calculation profiles and rules
    Regards,

  • Consuming document with different account assignment from Earmarked Funds

    Hi,
    We have implemented Public Sector FM functionality in version ECC 6.0 and we are using Earmarked Funds (Funds Reservation).
    The system is allowing to post consuming documents with different account assignment from that in the
    Funds reservation document nevertheless we donu2019t have set the indicator 'Acct.asst.changeable' in the Funds Reservation document.
    I don't need the fields Fund Center and Commitment Item to be transfered from earmarked funds document (Define Rules for Account Assignment Transfer). Instead, if consuming document have a different account assignment, the user should get the error message no. RE603 'Account assignment differs from document XX 001'.
    In version 4.6C it worked this way. In our case the Fund Center is delivered from Cost Center and Commitment Item is delivered from Cost Element (SAP - Derivation Strategy for FM Object Assignment).
    I hope someone can help me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Rodrigo

    Hi,
    You get the error message RE603 when you make the settings below:
    1. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Account assignment transfer > Define rules for account assignment transfer; you flag the 'Active' boxes for account assignment (sort of conterintuitive).
    2. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Change message control; change RE603 to 'E'.
    3. In Earmarked fund document, flag the 'Acct.asst. changeable' box (totally conterintuitive).
    Please give it a try and let us know the outcome.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • Rule based ATP

    hi gurus,
    can some one tell about rule based availability check.
    siva

    hi siva,
    Iterative, step-by-step availability checking process driven by self-defined rules. The results of one step determine, in conjunction with certain predefined parameters, whether the availability check should be continued.
    Example:
    1. Is the product available at this location?
    2. If not, is an alternative product available at this location?
    3. If not, is this product available at a different location?
    4. If not, is an alternative product available at an alternative location?
    5. If not, production is triggered.
    Rules-based ATP uses the advanced availability checking methods.
    Pl check this link where lots of related info on availability check is available
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/b6/de3efc6bbcdc4b948d466857a10323/content.htm">availability check</a>
    Pl reward if it helps.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sadhu Kishore

  • Rule based query

    Hi all,
    please forward information about Rule Based Query, actually i am nott getting what is rule based query, please help me out....
    Thanks and Regards,
    Santosh

    rule based optimizer is a older technique and cannot be used efficiently to optimize a query, now -a- days only cost based optimization would be effective and these are categories under which a query can be tuned. usually explain plan on a query would fetch you the rule or cost based information....Thank you

  • Customizing for multiple account assignment in OME9

    Hello,
    We want to create a specific account category with different account assignment fields (cost center, WBS, order, etc).
    This account category will be used for PO items with single account assignment or multiple account assignment.
    One more information is this specific account category will be used only for PO replicated from Supplier Relationship Management. This means PO document type will not be created directly in R/3.
    We use ECC6 with EhP4 with business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 active, so we make MAA for GR valuated.
    According to those elements, iI would like to have confirmation regarding customizing we implemented, especially for fields:
    - "Indicator: Account assignment screen" populated with value '2' (Multiple account assignment)
    - "Distribution" empty (Single account assignment),
    - "Partial Invoice" populated with value '2' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities proportionately).
    While creating PO in SRM and after replication in R/3, cost distribution is done correctly for item with multiple account assignment (Account Assignment tab with Partial Inv. =  "Distribute Proportionately" and Distribution = 1, 2 or 3, depending on cost distribution type chosen) whereas for item with single account assignment, Partial Inv. is "Derive from Account Assignment Category" and Distribution is "Single Account Assignment Category").
    So, it seems OK. Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation values i gave with above fields are correct in order to not have to change them later, i mean after PO were created, if problems occured.
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

    Hello,
    During PO replication from SRM to R/3, customizing from OME9 is not read and "Partial invoice indicator" is always defaulted to "1" when item has a multiple account assignment.
    This behaviour can be overwritten by implementing:
    - either BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI for method BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI,
    - or BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for method BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND.
    So, no need to take care of OME9 customizing.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Automatic Offsetting Account Assignment

    Hiii
    this is ramki
    Can any body tell me about AUTOMATIC OFFSETTING ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT and ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT MODELS
    plssss
    regards
    ramki

    ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT MODELS means its one type of reference document , lke sample document  & Recurring Document.
    Detail docuemntation i will send it to you.
    chandra

Maybe you are looking for