Account Type for Rollup/Parent Nodes in Fusion GL Hierarchies

We are currently implementing Fusion GL.  As part of creating reporting hierarchies, there is some unclarity around requirements for how to assign the Account Type field (Asset, Liability, Owner's Equity, Exp, Rev) for the rollup/parent nodes in the natural account dimension.  Does the Account Type field impact any reporting or functionality when applied to a rollup/parent node?  Or can they all be defaulted to one option?
Thanks.

Hello Vadim,
Thanks for prompt reply.
Can you please elaborate with an example.
I have a GL account no 4000 for AST and my parent node is NEWB
After loading master data I am getting ACCTYPE for GL Account No 4000 as AST but my parent node NEWB is EXP due to above mentioned mapping.
Do I have to map all my GL accounts and hierarchy nodes in my conversion file with respective ACCTYPE?
Regards
Gaurav

Similar Messages

  • How can i change the account type for one of my email accounts

    I set up an account as IMAP, but I don't see the benefit, and want to switch it to POP the same as all my other accounts. The thing is, there seems to be no way to do this without losing all my email messages in this account... is there?

    Set up a new account for POP. Take the IMAP account offline for now.
    The Mails will disappear from that IMAP account once the POP account wipes them off the Server though.

  • How to add an item object as a child for a specified parent node in AdvancedDataGrid in Flex?

    Hi all,
              This is the code, to add a object as a child into a specified parent node in AdvancedDataGrid in flex.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><mx:Application
    xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" layout="absolute" creationComplete="onCreationComplete()" width="100%" height="100%">
    <mx:Script><![CDATA[
    importmx.controls.Alert; 
    importmx.collections.IHierarchicalCollectionViewCursor; 
    importmx.collections.IHierarchicalCollectionView;  
    importmx.collections.ArrayCollection; [
    Bindable]private var objectAC:ArrayCollection = newArrayCollection(); 
    //This method is used to construct the ArrayCollection 'flatData' 
    private function onCreationComplete():void{
    var objOne:Object = newObject(); objOne.name =
    "Rani"; objOne.city =
    "Chennai";objectAC.addItem(objOne);
    var objTwo:Object = newObject(); objTwo.name =
    "Rani"objTwo.city =
    "Bangalore";objectAC.addItem(objTwo);
    var objThree:Object = newObject(); objThree.name =
    "Raja"; objThree.city =
    "Mumbai";objectAC.addItem(objThree);
    //This method is used to add one object as a child item for the parent node 'Rani' 
    private function addChildItem():void{
    var dp:IHierarchicalCollectionView = groupedADG.dataProvider asIHierarchicalCollectionView;  
    varcurent:IHierarchicalCollectionViewCursor = groupedADG.dataProvider.createCursor();  
    var dummyParentNode:Object = {name:"Rani", city:"New Delhi"};  
    var obj:Object = null; 
    while(curent.current){
    // To get the current node objectobj = curent.current;
    // Add Child item, when depth = 1 and Node name should be "Rani" 
    if (curent.currentDepth == 1 && obj["GroupLabel"] == "Rani"){
    dp.addChild(curent.current, dummyParentNode);
    curent.moveNext();
    groupedADG.dataProvider = dp;
    groupedADG.validateNow();
    groupedADG.dataProvider.refresh();
    ]]>
    </mx:Script> 
    <mx:AdvancedDataGrid id="groupedADG" x="10" y="15" designViewDataType="tree" defaultLeafIcon="{null}" sortExpertMode="true" width="305" > 
    <mx:dataProvider> 
    <mx:GroupingCollection id="gc" source="{objectAC}"> 
    <mx:grouping> 
    <mx:Grouping> 
    <mx:GroupingField name="name"/> 
    </mx:Grouping> 
    </mx:grouping> 
    </mx:GroupingCollection> 
    </mx:dataProvider> 
    <mx:columns> 
    <mx:AdvancedDataGridColumn headerText="Name" dataField="name"/> 
    <mx:AdvancedDataGridColumn headerText="City" dataField="city"/> 
    </mx:columns> 
    </mx:AdvancedDataGrid> 
    <mx:Button x="10" y="179" label="Open the folder 'Rani'. Then Click this Button" width="305" click="addChildItem()" /> 
    </mx:Application> 

    Hi,
    It's not possible to 'append' a StringItem or a TextField (or any other lcdui.Item object) to a Canvas or GameCanvas. You can only draw lines, draw images, draw text, etc etc, on a Canvas screen. So, you can only 'simulate' the look and feel of a TextField (on a Canvas) by painting it and adding source code for command handling (like key presses). However, this will be quite some work!!
    lcdui.Item objects can only be 'appended' to a Form-like Displayable.
    Cheers for now,
    Jasper

  • Account type D is not defined for document type RE - Credit Memo

    I tried to key in credit memo of fixed asset at MIRO but prompt out this errors "Account type D is not defined for document type RE". I checked OMBA - account type for vendor is selected. Any advise to resolve this problem?

    Hi Sanil,
    It is just a debit Vendor and Cerdit Fixed Asset. Is anything wrong here?

  • Copy values from one Parent node to other Parent Node

    Hi all,
    I have a 2 Parent node each having 3 child nodes. I want to copy the values of all the attributes of all the child nodes of one Parent Node to corresponding other node.
    Both the Parent Nodes as well as their Child Nodes have different name but their attributes have same name.For ex:
    Parent Node -A
    Child Nodes - a, b,c
    Child Node "a" has attributes "x" and "y"
    Parent Node -B
    Child Nodes - d,e,f
    Child Node "d" has attributes "x" and "y" .
    Now I want to copy the values od attributes "x" and "y" from one Parent Node to other Parent node.
    Please help me out.
    Helpful answers will be rewarded.
    Thanxs in advance...

    Hi Jin,
    To use copy service API, u need to satisfy 2 condition for the attributes of source node and target node:
    1. The name of the attribute should be same (including the case of the name)- Abc is different from ABC
    2. Type of the attribute should also be the same.
    copy elements works for copying values from Model node to context and does not work vice-versa. To enable the copying of context node to model node, use copycorresponding API.
    Eg:
    int contextNodeSize = wdContext().node<contextNodeName>().size();
    for(int i = 0; i < contextNodeSize; i++)
         <modelNodeName> modelObject = new <modelNodeName>();
         <contextNodeName>Element contextObject = wdContext().node<contextNodeName>().get<contextNodeName>ElementAt(i);
         WDCopyService.copyCorresponding(contextObject, modelObject);
    This will copy the values from Context Node to Model Node.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Poojith MV

  • P & l Account Type Creation

    Hi Friends,
                    I am a beginner in FICO.I am having a problem while creating a GL account.The problem is that whenever I am creating a GL account of particular king, I am getting a message that there is no P & L account type for this particular GL account.Please advice me a solution for this problem.
    Regards
    Ashish.

    Hi
    The first thing that you need to understand is that there are 2 areas where all accounts will report to.
    They are the profit and loss accounts and the balance sheet accounts.
    So create the account in FS00 and in the type description tab, you need to select the BS or PL radio button. So basically all your assets and liabilities will go to balance sheet and the expenses and the incomes will go to the PL acccounts.
    So you need to check the PL radio button.
    I hope this will help. Pls get back in case the problem persisits.

  • Account type table

    Hi
      Can any anyone tell me the table for Account type for the G/L Account number.
      Thanks.

    hai
    go to the BSEG table u can find the account type feild KOART
    BSEG-KOART  = account type
    BSEG- HKONT = General Ledger Account
    regard
    nawa

  • Maintaining different values for Accounting Type (KOART)

    Hi experts,
    I have several accounting tcodes such as FBV0, FB03, FB08, FV65,FV60 in one parent role.
    FV60, FV65 are added to this role as FBV0 is checking internally for this authorization object. 
    All these tcodes share a same object  F_BKPF_KOA which differ by activity and the accounting type (KOART).
    The KOART field is an org level field defined by SAP and I have entered D,K,S as values.
    But the auth object values should be different for the accounting types.
    i.e  03 for D,K,S
         01,02,03,77  for S
         03,77 for K
    All the derived/child roles for this parent should also have the same document type as the parent. How can I achieve this as this object is maintained at the org level.
    I could not delete this obj from being an org level element as it is defined by SAP.
    Appreciate your response.
    Thanks
    Kee

    > If KOART is an org field you cannot differentiate between authorized activities for each of the KOART values in one role. Whether you maintain values in the parent or not only matters if you're planning to assign the parent roles to users or if you just use them as templates.
    >
    Parent Roles should not be assigned to any users. It should only be used as Template to grant and control Non-Organization Level authorizations centrally (you can see these option in Parent roles). Concept of Parent-Child role is to avoid creating same roles where all authorization field values are exactly same and differs only for Organization Values (different Site / Branch Office specific constants). So we can maintain the Org. levels as different sets for a single Parent role as I already explained.
    For more details:  Note#314513 - PFCG: Maintaining individual organizational levels
    Note#532695 - PFCG: Incorrect organizational level values in derived roles
    >
    > Please elaborate on this one. I think we're running into an urban myth here....
    >
    > Organizational levels are only instruments to assist in building roles. For the final profile it does not matter whether a field is organizational or not. It will not influence the behaviour of the authority-check.
    For the final profile it matters during loading of User authorization data to User Buffer. Think about the Parameter values stored for a particular user. How it behaves for all Objects containing a particular Auth. Field and providing default assignment for that user whenever he tries to perform any action where this field is required to populate.
    If we delete any Object from SU24 proposal then it doesn't mean that the check will not be carried out or the Org. Field contained in that object will not be populated with it's values. I tried to make this clear to the requester.
    Regards,
    Dipanjan
    Edited by: Dipanjan Sanpui on Jun 8, 2009 7:49 AM

  • Do not enter an account number for a masked account type

    Good Morning
    1)
    I am trying to give some account number in open / close posting period window. From acount field (Lower limit of the G/L account numbers ) is not accepting the value. I have also tried with ZZZZZ and many other options. Can any one help what could be he reason ?
    This is the Error Message
    Do not enter an account number for a masked account type
    2) Who is responsible to create the Authorization Group? What is FICO consultant role here ?
    Eg: I want to give some privileges to one of the users in Management to open and close the posting period for all the nominals for all posting periods.
    who creates the Authorization Group
    Regards
    Amar

    Hi,
    1, For account group the error may be comimg because already data is created. In lower limit donot enter ZZZZZ as it is considered as the highest value.  You can try the lowest account number.
    2. Creating a role is job of bais based on the FICO tcode given by FICO consultant. For special privilages to a role you can ask to basis guy to create a separate role and assign to user.
    Regards
    Milind Sonalkar

  • BOM: Finding Children Nodes For a Given Parent Node

    Hi,
    I am trying to find the longest path for a particular BOM material. I am using the FM CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2 to explode the BOM to get the materials (including children nodes etc.). I think, in this scenario, a recursive function would be the best way to go. The problem is to find the children nodes for a node in a particular level. Looking at the structure STPOX and the fields STUFE (Level), WGEXX (path) , TTIDX (index) and VWGEX (path, multi-level), I cannot find a logical way to link the children nodes to a parent node although visually I can see how things are connected when the FM returns the STB table..
    For example: TBL_STB returns from FM:
    STUFE     WEGXX     BMTYP     TTIDX     VWEGX     OJTXB
    1     1     M     1     0     MATXX1
    2     1     M     2     1     MATXX2
    3(a)     1     M     3     1              MATXX3     
    4(c)     1     M     4     1              MATXX4               
    4(d)     2     M     4     1              MATXX5     
    3(b)     2     M     3     1              MATXX6     
    4(e)     3     M     5     2              MATXX7     
    4(f)     4     M     5     2              MATXX8     
    Visually, we can tell that  Level 2 has one item 2, level 3 has 2 items, 3(a) and 3(b), Level 4 has 4 items where 4c and 4d are connected to 3a and 4e and 4f are connected to 3b.
    Going through STPOX structure itself, how can we find out that 4c and 4d belongs to assembly 3a but 4e and 4f belong to 3b??  If someone can explain the uses of the differnet indicators in STPOX (or other) where I can find out the children from the parent, it would be greatly helpful to write the recursive function..
    Thanks in advance..
    P.S. I will give points out immediately for any useful answers..
    Edited by: Shuvo Datta on Sep 10, 2008 6:17 PM

    Figured it out myself

  • Message no. F5350 account type/account for invoice reference does not match

    Hi SD Experts
    Getting error message when the Billing document is released to accounting.
    "Message no. F5350 account type/account for invoice reference does not match item"
    Client is having 6.0 version , I have checked OSS notes, only available for upto 4.7 version.
    Please help to solve this issue.
    Thanks/karthik

    have you checked which account type is maintained in respective G/L account which supposed to be hit once invoice is released . eg: check in Reconcilation account assigned in Customer Master in FS00, Reconcillation account for accoun type should be - D= Customers.
    similarly for other accounts such as "Revenue account"  & check Field status group assigned in G/L account in FS00.
    Check & revert

  • Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999

    Hi friends
    I am in SD. I am trying to create stock for newly created material, movement type 561. system give error Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999.
    I use the T. Code OB52, i am confuse which combination i.e. variant, A, from Account, To Account, from per. 1 Year, To period, Year, from per. 2 year, To Period, Year, I should choose, can some one send me detail reply and solution which may display after this t. code OB52. I also have questin which movement type i should use.
    Using T.Code MMPV, i have created new period (from company code 1000, To Company code 1000, period 01, Fiscal Year 1020.
    I was reading previous solution, one of them was i should close period 2009. I tried to do this using using MMPV, i entered fiscal year 2009. Error display  The specified year 2009 is not the current calender year.
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi
    Hope you are doing this in test server
    If this is a real time issue this needs to be addressed by a FI consultant
    First see for your company code what is the posting period varient maintained in OBY6
    Say if it is 1000
    Then in OB52
    Maintain a setting like this
    1000-S-BLANK-ZZZZZZZZZZ-1--2010122010-13--201016--2010
    Then save it
    This is for Account type S that is GL accounts
    Preferably maintain the same for      A,   + ,   D,   K,   M,   V
    Regards
    Raja

  • How to create a account key for application type M ?

    Hi Guys,
    How to create a account key for application type M ? and link the same with
    Gl account.
    thanks.

    Hi
    Please create the account keys or transaction keys in
    SPRO-> IMG-> MM-> Purchasing-> Conditions-> Define Price Determination Process-> Define Transaction/Event Keys
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Transaction type for Account Determination

    This doubt in STO scenario:
    STO - between 2 plants - different company codes under same client
    Created STO from Receiving Plant in ME21N with document type NB
    Based on that STO, Created Delivery in VL10B from supplying Plant
    Tried PGI in VL02N from supplying Plant.
    Received the Error Message as below:
    Posting keys for account determination for transaction BUV do not exist
    Message no. F5598
    Diagnosis
    The posting keys necessary for account determination for transaction BUV have not been set.
    System Response
    Because the posting key is missing, the system cannot generate any automatic postings.
    Procedure
    Maintain the posting keys necessary for transaction BUV.
    After working thru OBYC found that the transaction type BUV is missing.
    How to create the transaction type?
    Thanks in advance
    Vaidee
    Edited by: Vaidee on Mar 11, 2009 10:08 AM

    Thanks for the effort.
    Executed TCode OBYA.
    Entered the company codes.
    For Company Code 1 u2013 Receivable u2013 Debit posting Key u2013 86
    For Company Code 1 u2013 Payable u2013 Credit posting key u2013 96
    For Company Code 1 u2013 Receivable u2013 Debit posting Key u2013 86
    For Company Code 1 u2013 Payable u2013 Credit posting key u2013 96
    Tried to change the posting key to 89 and 99.
    Error message is :
    Enter posting key with account type D, K or S
    Message no. F4809
    Diagnosis
    You have specified a posting key which is defined for neither customer, nor vendor, nor G/L account postings
    Thanks
    Vaidee

  • Account groups & Sales order types for 5 Companies

    Dear All,
    There are 5 company codes under one client but these are five different operating entities (Companies). I mean there is no intercompany process at all. One company will act as a customer / Vendor to another and even they file there IT returns separately.
    But the business (Sales / Purchases) processes in these company codes are exactly the same.
    Please help me out with the following issue under the above situation:
    1)     Will there be a common Account Group for all 5 company codes as it is defined at client level or there should be a separate Account Group Company codewise as 5 companies are operating separately.
    2)     Similarly Sales Document types i.e., ZIN, ZQT, ZOR, ZLF, ZF2 should be defined separately for each company code or not?
    Regards,
    Pankaj

    Hi Akasha,
    You said : for the document types again , a single document type can be used for all the company codes, unless there is some other specific case where in seperate document type is required
    Cud you plz lemme know an example of any such specific case. Because if single document type for 5 companies is not affecting any Business Process Financially and operationwise. I can go ahead by sharing one document type for 5 Companies.
    Only one thing cud be is the number range, which will also be shared. Am I right ?
    Thnx & Best Regards,
    Pankaj

Maybe you are looking for