ACE and AAA (TACACS) part 2

Hi there,
i have configuerd my acs with an custom attribute : shell:Admin=Admin. AAA with the ACE works fine... But now i can't login into my switches :-( i got the massage authorization failed. Here is the aaa debug from the switch :
Jul 12 13:41:38.433 UTC: AAA: parse name=tty2 idb type=-1 tty=-1
Jul 12 13:41:38.441 UTC: AAA: name=tty2 flags=0x11 type=5 shelf=0 slot=0 adapter=0 port=2 channel=0
Jul 12 13:41:38.441 UTC: AAA/MEMORY: create_user (0x16E1F28) user='NULL' ruser='NULL' ds0=0 port='tty2' rem_addr='*******' authen_type=ASCII service=LOGIN priv=1 initial_task_id='0', vrf= (id=0)
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): Port='tty2' list='' service=EXEC
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: tty2 (945064986) user='*******'
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): send AV service=shell
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): send AV cmd*
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): found list "default"
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): Method=tacacs+ (tacacs+)
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/TAC+: (945064986): user=*******
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/TAC+: (945064986): send AV service=shell
Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/TAC+: (945064986): send AV cmd*
Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR (945064986): Post authorization status = PASS_ADD
Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV service=shell
Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV cmd*
Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV priv-lvl=15
Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV shell:Admin=Admin
Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: received unknown mandatory AV: shell:Admin=Admin
Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Authorization FAILED
Jul 12 13:41:46.804 UTC: AAA/MEMORY: free_user (0x16E1F28) user='*******' ruser='NULL' port='tty2' rem_addr='*******' authen_type=AS
Any idea what's wrong ??
Best regards Dirk

Hi ,
i've got the following info from a user here in the forum :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080686bbb.html#wp1519045
[quote]
The user profile attribute serves an important configuration function configuration for a TACACS+ server group. If the user profile attribute is not obtained from the server during authentication, or if the profile is obtained from the server but the context name(s) in the profile do not match the context in which the user is trying to log in, the default role (Network-Monitor) and default domain (default-domain) will be assigned to the user provided the authentication is successful.
[quote end]
In this way i configured the ACS...
Be carefull with the attribute... because if you set it in the way the documentation describes you will not authorized at other devices using tacacs+.
You have to set the attribute in this way :
shell:* it's working for both switches / ACE
shell:= this works only for the ACE
Then the attribute is marked as optional and only the ACE cares about it.
Regards Dirk

Similar Messages

  • ACE and AAA (TACACS+)

    Hi there,
    i have configuerd my acs with an custom attribute : shell:Admin=Admin. AAA with the ACE works fine... But now i can't login into my switches :-( i got the massage authorization failed. Here is the aaa debug from the switch :
    Jul 12 13:41:38.433 UTC: AAA: parse name=tty2 idb type=-1 tty=-1
    Jul 12 13:41:38.441 UTC: AAA: name=tty2 flags=0x11 type=5 shelf=0 slot=0 adapter=0 port=2 channel=0
    Jul 12 13:41:38.441 UTC: AAA/MEMORY: create_user (0x16E1F28) user='NULL' ruser='NULL' ds0=0 port='tty2' rem_addr='*******' authen_type=ASCII service=LOGIN priv=1 initial_task_id='0', vrf= (id=0)
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): Port='tty2' list='' service=EXEC
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: tty2 (945064986) user='*******'
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): send AV service=shell
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): send AV cmd*
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): found list "default"
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: tty2 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (945064986): Method=tacacs+ (tacacs+)
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/TAC+: (945064986): user=*******
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/TAC+: (945064986): send AV service=shell
    Jul 12 13:41:44.590 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/TAC+: (945064986): send AV cmd*
    Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR (945064986): Post authorization status = PASS_ADD
    Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV service=shell
    Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV cmd*
    Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV priv-lvl=15
    Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Processing AV shell:Admin=Admin
    Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: received unknown mandatory AV: shell:Admin=Admin
    Jul 12 13:41:44.799 UTC: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Authorization FAILED
    Jul 12 13:41:46.804 UTC: AAA/MEMORY: free_user (0x16E1F28) user='*******' ruser='NULL' port='tty2' rem_addr='*******' authen_type=AS
    Any idea what's wrong ??
    Best regards Dirk

    Hi Prem,
    thanks a lot. it's working now...
    FYI i need this attribute for role mapping USER<>ROLE in the ACE.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080686bbb.html#wp1519045
    Can you give me a link where i found the information you gave me.
    Best regards
    Dirk

  • Integrate Cisco ACE into AAA TACACS+

    Dear Community!
    I would like to configure Cisco ACE 4710 CLI and WebAmin to use ACS v4.2 TACACS+ authentication and accounting feature. After found a Cisco document, which describes ACE AAA features (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/security/guide/aaa.html), I have setup all configuration parameters mentioned in this document, everything seems to be OK.
    But...
    I have a TACACS+ group named "Network Administrators", which has privilege level 15 option enabled, so admins do not have to type enable password when authenticating. After setting up ACE AAA, the prvilege level 15 option stops working, while logging in Cisco routers: after authentication, the user remains in privilege level 1.
    Logging in Cisco switches seems to be OK, stepping immediately to level 15 as usual.
    I tried upgrading IOS in a router, but no luck...
    Does anybody have any experiance about this "bug"?
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Belabacsi
    @ Budapest, Hungary

    Hello Bela
    In ACE on every context (including Admin and other) you should have following strings:
    tacacs-server host x.x.x.x key 7 "xxx"
    tacacs-server host x.x.x.x key 7 "xxx"
    aaa group server tacacs+ MYTACACS
      server x.x.x.x
      server x.x.x.x
    aaa authentication login default group MYTACACS local
    aaa authentication login console group MYTACACS local
    aaa accounting default group x.x.x.x
    On ACS side for group named "Network Administrators" you should configure in TACACS settting:
    1. Shell (exec) enable
    2. Privilege level 15
    3. Custom attributes:
              shell:Admin*Admin default-domain
        if you have additional context add next line
              shell:mycontext*Admin default-domain
    After loging to ACE and issuing sh users command you should see following
    User            Context                                                                 Line     Login Time   (Location)        Role   Domain(s)   
    *adm-x       Admin                                                                   pts/0   Sep 21 12:24  (x.x.x.x)    Admin   default-domain
    Regards,
    Stas

  • ACE - Setup AAA TACACS+ using CS Unix ACS

    Hi,
    I have setup AAA tacacs+ on ACE Admin context with RSA token. This is similar to AAA IOS setup.
    I can login but it does not allow me to do any commands.
    "show users", under Domain says I am logged in as "
    Network-Monitor default-domain".
    Any ideas how to get around and making myself as Admin group?
    Also is there any doco on setting AAA on ACE module using Cisco Secure For Unix ACS?
    Thanks
    Sanjay

    Hi,
    It did work as you suggested. I had to move user in [Root] as we have other Shell attributes in different groups.
    ct 16 15:18:29 c1 CiscoSecure: [ID 428912 local0.debug] DEBUG -
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 user = test2 {
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 service = shell {
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 set optional shell:Admin = "Admin Admin default-domain"
    Oct 16 13:18:29 c1 }
    Oct 16 13:18:29 c1 service = exec {
    Oct 16 13:18:29 c1 set optional shell:Admin = "Admin Admin default-domain"
    ACE-Admin/Admin# sh users
    User Context Line Login Time (Location) Role Domain(s)
    admin Admin pts/0 Oct 17 13:43 (127.0.0.71) Admin default-domain
    *test2 Admin pts/1 Oct 17 14:07 (a.b.c.d) Admin default-domain
    When I moved user in the support group with existing shell access configured, it dumps in network monitor mode. Maybe due to TACACS attribute inheritance. I did not want to stuff up existing support users.
    So I guess my option is to use RADIUS as login method.
    I am trying to get it going but the CS ACS Unix does not like :
    cisco-avpair = "shell:Admin=Admin default-domain;
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 radius = ACE_Admin_Pri {
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 check_items = {
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 200 = 1
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 }
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 reply_attributes = {
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 26 = "cisco-avpair=shell:Admin=Admin default-domain; "
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 6 = 6
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 }
    Oct 16 15:18:29 c1 }
    Now I get :
    [ID 901471 local0.warning] WARNING - RADIUS: Invalid attribute (1) in profile
    Oct 17 15:49:41 c1 CiscoSecure: [ID 347837 local0.warning] WARNING - RADIUS: Authenticate: from (10.17.1.4) -
    test2 failed
    It would be good to see if anyone else has tried this.
    sanjay

  • ACE and TACACS+ auth

    I'm having to use the free TACACS+ in an environment to configure authentication for all the network devices.  I have all the routers and switches working just fine, but am having issue with getting the ACE to use TACACS.  I've configured ACE to authenticate to an ACS server by adding the additional shell custom attributes (shell:Admin*Admin default-domain) and this worked fine.  I found in some documentation on TACACS+ that described how to add this similar attribute to the tac_plus.conf file, but it doesn't seem to want to work. My aaa config from the ACE as well as the tac_plus.conf file content below.  I know the AAA is working with this TACACS server as the accounting functions properly.
    ACE AAA
    tacacs-server host 10.1.0.202 key 7 <removed>
    aaa group server tacacs+ TAC_AUTH
      server 10.1.0.202
    aaa authentication login default group TAC_AUTH local
    aaa authentication login console group TAC_AUTH local
    aaa accounting default group TAC_AUTH local
    tac_plus.conf
    # Accounting Logs
    accounting file = /data/tacacs.log
    # Server Key
    key = <removed>
    # ACL
    acl = auth_routers {
                          permit = .*
    # Groups
    group = admin {
        login = file /etc/passwd
        acl = auth_routers
        service = exec {
                         optional shell:Admin = "Admin default-domain"
    # Users
    user = admin1 {
         default service = permit
         member = admin
    user = admin2 {
         default service = permit
         member = admin
    user = admin3 {
         default service = permit
         member = admin

    Anyone?

  • It's my 3000 post – Oracle ACE and Oracle employees

    Hello,
    So, this is my post number 3000. In this forum, it’s not so unique, but still I decided to dedicate it to the subject of Oracle ACE and Oracle employees.
    Recently, Joel blogged about Carl awarded Oracle ACE (http://joelkallman.blogspot.com/2009/02/carl-backstrom-oracle-ace.html), after special efforts made by Sharon, because “the folks at the Oracle Technology Network decided that Oracle employees could no longer be awarded the ACE designation”. I truly wish I could write that Carl is a living proof of this decision being misguided. Unfortunately, I can’t. However, Carl’s case paints the situation in strong colors. Only after his death, Carl was honored with something that I’m sure seems so obvious to most of us.
    I’m thinking that if this decision, not to award Oracle employees with Oracle ACE, was made sooner, people like Scott and Joel would not have awarded Oracle ACE, not to mention Tom Kyte, and probably others I’m not familiar with. Scott and Joel deals with APEX all day long, as part of their job, and this forum is not part of their day job description. Still, they find the time to help us all. Just look at the post counter of Scott. I’m amazed each time I see it. Scott, with all his experience, doesn’t limit himself to only the most complicated issues. You can see his replies, to the most basic issues, almost every day. Joel never failed helping me, and many others on this forum, every time there is an issue only he can help with. Scott and Joel were lucky, and have been awarded Oracle ACE, prior to this decision. Carl was less lucky, and as Joel wrote, I can’t think of anyone who better represent the true meaning and spirit of the Oracle ACE program.
    The point I’m trying to make is that Oracle ACE should not be left for luck and timing, or place of work, for that matter. I’m sure that the OTN folks had best intensions when making this decision. I can understand that people might suspect favoritism toward Oracle employees; however, the solution shouldn’t be the easy one – no to every Oracle employee.
    While writing, I can think of Tyler. He’s no longer a member of the APEX team, but we can still enjoy his wisdom and experience on this forum, not to mention his APEX dedicated blog entries, were he covers special and more complex aspects of working with this tool. I don’t know if Tyler qualifies to become Oracle ACE (and, of course, I’m only using him as an example) but it seems wrong to me not to even consider it, just because he happens to work for Oracle. I’m sure there are others like Tyler, in the other forums. I believe that this kind of behavior, by Oracle employees, should be encouraged, and not taken for granted. Certainly, they shouldn’t be penalized.
    So, what all of this has to do with my 3000 posts? I believe I earned the right to call myself a frequent poster on this forum. As such, I know how time consuming this forum can be, not to mention the hard and tedious job of keep repeating the same answers to the same questions, keep pointing to old references, and such. So, I want to take this opportunity to thank all the active participants of this forum, Oracle employees and others. In spite of all the hardship, this forum can also be very rewarding, and at least for me, a very educated experience. I learned a lot in my attempts to help others. I can all heartedly recommend it to everyone who enjoys helping others, and enriching him /her self in the process.
    Regards,
    Arie.

    If I understand you correctly, you ought to reinstall. At this point, even if you're able to resurrect this installation, it might be severely unstable. Mostly because of my proclivity for messing around with settings until I screw something up, I have a tremendous amount of experience with the recovery console, and my success rate is not inspiring. If you have data you need on the drive, your best course of action is to reinstall to a different boot drive, and once you’re able to boot, archive the files you want from the corrupted installation. Then you can wax both drives, restore the data and get everything back the way you want it. Getting your data back from the recovery console is basically a lost cause since it doesn't support wildcards (as in, you'd have to copy every freaking file one at a time).
    I re-read the above paragraph, and it's not the clearest thing I've ever written, so if you need clarification on anything, let me know.

  • AAA TACACS with Brocade Switches

    We are testing authentication on Brocade switches with our AAA TACACS+ server.  It seems that after authenicating to enable mode, you can type "exit" and be dropped back to level 7 mode.  From this point you can type "enable" and authenticate to the switch using the local "enable" password, not from TACACS.  Has anyone run across this and is there a way to correct it?  Is there something that needs to be configured in TACACS on the server to recognise the Brocade switch and make this work?
    Ray

    Hi Ray,
    What ACS version you are using?
    On a cisco switch the following command is used:
    switch(config)# aaa authentication enable default tacacs+ enable
    The above command is used to set the TACACS+ as the default check for the enable password. If TACACS+ is not available it will fall back to the local enable password.
    You need to look into such option in the Brocade switch.
    HTH
    Amjad
    Rating useful replies is more useful than saying "Thank you"

  • When I get an alert from my car sat nav the music on my iphone has a long delay before it comes back on and misses a part of the track why does it do this.

    When I get an alert from my car sat nav the music on my iphone has a long delay before it comes back on and misses a part of the track why does it do this.
    It only seems to do this since an iphone download last year.......its driving me mad !

    See:
    Recovering your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device: Apple Support Communities
    To copy iTunes purchases to the computer you have to log into (authorize) the account that purchased them and them transfer
    iTunes Store: Transferring purchases from your iOS device or iPod to a computer
    When associating a device with an Apple ID see the following regarding the 90 day limit.

  • I am using Adobe XI Pro and in various parts of the document there is brown / biege lettering when on the document it shows as black.  My printer guy has been in and checked it out top to bottom and that part is fine.  I have tried to print the same docum

    I am using Adobe XI Pro and in various parts of the document there is brown / biege lettering when on the document it shows as black.  My printer guy has been in and checked it out top to bottom and that part is fine.  I have tried to print the same document and it comes out fine.  Any ideas ?   Using Windows 7 Service Pack 1

    Sorry my bad.  I have tried to print the same document on another printer and all the formatting is fine. 

  • In mail, my attachments, both photos and documents appear in the body of the message.  How can I get my attachments to appear as a separate attachment and not as part of the message.  Thanks for your help, Karen.

    In mail, my attachments, both photos and documents, appear in the body of the message.  How can I get my attachments to appear as a separate attachment and not as part of the main message????  Thanks for your help, Karen.

    softwater wrote:
    ...and costs $14.99
    Yep! And if you absolutely need (or think you need) that functionality, it is worth every penny.
    As Don already pointed out, exactly what the recipient sees will depend on how they've set up their machine and what unnecessary 3rd party apps they might've installed to display attachments the way they want.
    In theory, that is true. In practice, Attachment Tamer will cause more of your messages to show up as plain-jane icons on the other end. The problem is, after all, people running Outlook 2003 and 2007. These people likely aren't doing many system modifications.
    If I were you, I'd use the free solutions provided above, save my money and let my recipients decide how they will handle their mail.
    I completely agree.

  • I have an ipad mini with ios 7.1.1 it lags a lot and the lower part of the screen is shaky after updating to ios 7.1.1

    i have an ipad mini with ios 7.1.1 it lags a lot and the lower part of the screen is shaky after updating to ios 7.1.1

    Thank you for the advice Randy. Very helpful of you to jump in with a post that adds so much value for the OP.
    A bit of advice for you as a new user. Please refrain from making assumptions and using hyperbole. Both get in the way of providing useful support. Not "everyone" has tried the basics, let alone know what they are. That's why they're here. These first steps in troubleshooting often fix the issue being asked. If this thread doesn't answer your question, move on and find one that does. Feel free to skip the thousands that advise a reset.

  • SharePoint 2013 and IE 11 issue - While creating a Web Part Page and Editing Web Part Properties

    I tried to edit a Web Part in SharePoint 2013 using IE 11 but I did not see the Edit Eeb Part dropdown menu at the top-right corner of the web part. Then I tried to create a Web Part page and I get the following error.
    Cannot create a Web Part Page with the current browser. Browsers that support the creation of Web Part Pages include Microsoft Internet Explorer 7.0 or later, Mozilla Firefox 3.0 or later, and Apple Safari 3.0 or later
    Strange !!! My web browser is IE 11.
    I tried the above two tasks in Google Chrome and worked fine.
    Solution:
    I added the site url to local intranet zone in IE 11 and I am now able to add Web Part Page and Edit Web Part in IE 11.
    imd.net

    Hi - One more solution is to add SharePoint site to compatibility group:
    http://blog.fpweb.net/sharepoint-internet-explorer-compatibility-issues-with-video/#.VAaZSPmSyy4
    -prs

  • I have an iPod 4th gen and the bottom part of it doesn't work where the space, .?123, and the go buttons are I droped it yesterday but it started doing this an hour ago I can slide to get in but it's stops working after that someone tell me how I fix this

    I have an iPod 4th gen and the bottom part of it doesn't work where the space, .?123, and the go buttons are not working I droped it yesterday but it started doing this an hour ago I can slide to get in but it's stops working after that someone tell me how I fix this

    Try:
    - Reset the iOS device. Nothing will be lost       
    Reset iOS device: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
    least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    - Restore from backup. See:                                                
    iOS: How to back up                                                                                     
    - Restore to factory settings/new iOS device.             
    If still problem, make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store since it appears you have a hardware problem.
      Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar                                              

  • Something went wrong with sync. between pc and Ipad now part of the information is gone on the ipad how do I put the backup from the pc to the ipad

    Something went wrong with sync. between pc and Ipad now part of the information is gone on the Ipad. How do I take the backup of the pc and put it back on the Ipad.

    Same thing just happened to me.  Help!

  • Urgent!!! Cisco ACE and asymetric routing assistance needed

    I am wondering if someone can give me pointers on the cisco ACE
    and asymetric routes. I've attached the diagram:
    -Cisco IOS IP address is 192.168.15.4/24 and 4.1.1.4/24
    -Firewall External interface is 192.168.15.1/24,
    -Firewall Internal interface is 192.168.192.1/24,
    -F5_BigIP External interface is 192.168.192.4/24,
    -F5_BigIP Internal interface is 192.168.196.1/24 and 192.168.197.1/24,
    -host_y has IP addresses of 192.168.196.10/24 and 192.168.197.10/24,
    -Checkpoint has static route for 192.168.196.0/24 and 192.168.197.0/24
    pointing to the F5_BigIP,
    -host_y is dual-home to both VLAN_A and VLAN_B with the default
    gateway on host_y pointing to VLAN_A which is 192.168.196.1,
    -host_x CAN ssh/telnet/http/https to both of host_y IP addresses
    of 192.168.196.10 and 192.168.197.10.
    In other words, from host_x, when I try to connect to host_y
    via IP address of 192.168.197.10, the traffics will go through VLAN_B
    but the return traffics will go through VLAN_A. Everything
    is working perfectly for me so far.
    Now customer just replaces the F5_BigIP with Cisco ACE. Now,
    I could not get it to work with Asymetric route with Cisco ACE. In
    other words, from host_x, I can no longer ssh or telnet to host_y
    via IP address of 192.168.197.10.
    Anyone knows how to get asymetric route to work on Cisco ACE?
    Thanks in advance.

    That won't work because ACE uses the vlan id to distinguish between flows.
    So when the response comes back on a different vlan, ACE can't find the flow it belongs to and it drops it.
    Even if we could force it to accept the packet, ACE would then try to create a new flow for this packet and it will collide with the flow already existing on the frontend.
    You would need to force your host to respond on the same vlan the traffic came in.
    This could be done with client nat on ACE using different nat pool.
    Gilles.

Maybe you are looking for

  • JDBC-RFC-JDBC  without  BPM

    Hi I have JDBC-RFC-JDBC Scenario.Now i have complated JDBC-RFC part but for the RFC response i dont want to use BPM . We are on PI 7.0 SP 11 . What changes needs to be done in module level to achieve this . Regards Vijay

  • No message above for me to install flash player

    So i've clicked agree and install now bit. Then theres supposed to be a message above that you right click on and click install activeX Control according to the instructions i've read. There isn't a message and i've got no clue how to install it. Doe

  • Monitor Sleep Problem

    I have a Hanns.G external monitor that no longer goes to energy saver mode (displays no signal input - check video cable) when I put my MacPro to sleep. This has been the case since I installed the MacOSX 10.6.3 update. I've reset both the PRAM and S

  • Workflow variant for payment release

    Hello ,   I have done the configuration of workflow variant for payment release but still the invoice is not getting blocked when we are paying it . Find below the configuration done for it . SPRO-Accounts Receivable and Payable-Business Transactions

  • Error upgrading to 3.1.2 on XE

    Hi, I ran the upgrade on my laptop where I have windows XP and APEX 3.1.1 installed. I got the following error during the upgrade : declare ERREUR Ó la ligne 1 : ORA-00600: code d'erreur interne, arguments : [kokegPinLob1], [], [], [], [], ORA-06512: