Acrobat is not validating digital signature

Hi Everybody...
I have generated a pdf file which includes digital signatures.
But the acrobat is not validating the digital signature. But if
we open this file in PDF-xchange viewer, it shows that the
signatures are valid. Acrobat generates the following error...
Error during signature verification.
Signature contains incorrect, unrecognized, corrupted or
suspicious data.
Support Information: SigDict /Contents illegal data
What may be the problem?

Thank you Bernd for your kind and simple reply  
I am uploading my file with my certificate which i am using for my digital
signatures. Please have a deep look at contents entry. Use ASNVIEWER or
decoder etc......
Thanks again and Best Regards

Similar Messages

  • Acrobat 9 and Validating Digital Signatures

    I'd heard that Acrobat 9 had found a way to eliminate the problem of sending your certificate to everyone who needs to validate your signature on a form, but I haven't been able to prove that. I'm testing 9 and so far the only difference I see is that instead of seeing an icon next to the signature stating that it can't be validated, it now states it in a bar across the top of the document. Has anyone else found something different?
    Thanks!
    Anita

    For a signature to be considered valid, there must be a "trust" relationship between the validator and the signer. So if I sign a document and claim to be be "Bill Clinton", the signature doesn't show as valid unless you've established that I really signed the document using Bill Clinton's credentials. Public key cryptography provides this assurance by signing using a private key and publishing a public key that can be used to verify that the real private key was used. But you have to have that public key, and that is what is distributed and "trusted" within Acrobat or Reader.
    In Acrobat 8, there are basically 2 ways to get that trust relationship: 1) Exchanging certificates with people you trust or 2) purchasing a certificate from an Adobe partner that sells pre-vetted and trusted certificates (where you have to do some work to prove you are who you say you are). These certificates have a trust relationship pre-built into Acrobat so you don't have to set up trust.
    In Acrobat 9 there are 2 new mechanisms for establishing trust, but they facilitate, but not eliminate the need to establish trust.
    First, you can create a security settings file which includes trust relationships and distribute it to your group either in an ad-hoc way (email, etc.) or by posting on a server and having Acrobat or Reader automatically load the settings. This makes it easier to set up signature workflows in a small group or enterprise environment.
    Second, there is a new way for establishing large scale trust for digital identities issued by large organizations such as government agencies or countries where these will also have trust automatically managed by Acrobat and Reader.
    The new features are described in http://www.adobe.com/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/sharing_security_settings_90.pdf

  • Can't open PDF.  Program does not have valid digital signature. No valid Acrobat S/N found.

    I recently bought new HP computer with Windows 7.  I loaded my Adobe Creative Suite 2 Premium.  Illustrator tries to open then just disappears.  I can not open PDF's.  Get the following message:  This program doesn't have valid digital signature that verifies it's signature.  No valid Acrobat S/N found. Acrobat will now quit.  Then: There is a problem with Adobe Acrobat/Reader. Please exit and try again.  When I exit - computer locks up.

    These can be frustrating.
    Try restarting your PC.
    Using a different browser.
    There have been reports that this can be due to router problems.
    A simple way round it is to get a friend to download the installer for your and put it on a USB stick.

  • Install blocked does not have a valid digital signature verifying publisher.

    Windows XP blocked the install. Error message was:
    Unknown Publisher. Does not have a valid digital signature that verifies its puiblisher.

    That suggests that the installer is getting damaged during the download.
    I'd first try downloading an installer from the Apple website using a different web browser:
    http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
    If you use Firefox instead of IE for the download (or vice versa), do you get a working installer?

  • TS3212 I have removed my pop-up blocker completely and still receive the following error message when attempting to download iTunes:  "The file was blocked because it does not have a valid digital signature that verifies its publisher".....any ideas?

    have removed my pop-up blocker completely and still receive the following error message when attempting to download iTunes:  "The file was blocked because it does not have a valid digital signature that verifies its publisher".....any ideas?

    That suggests that the installer is getting damaged during the download.
    I'd first try downloading an installer from the Apple website using a different web browser:
    http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
    If you use Firefox instead of IE for the download (or vice versa), do you get a working installer?

  • I can't affix my valid digital signature to adobe reader pdf document?

    I can't affix my valid digital signature to adobe reader pdf document. When the signature field is clicked, it is not showing my digital ID so that I can sign with it. Why it is not displaying my valid digital ID?

    What is your operating system?  What is your Reader version?  What means "can not"?
    Can you post a screenshot of such a message "to buy Adobe XI"?

  • "valid digital signature" required????

    I am trying to download a poker website that i have been using for years and i now get a message saying "...valid digital signature missing...".  I don't understand.  I would appreciate any help.  Thanks

    Sounds like your security settings for their site are missing - such as might happen when you delete temproary Internet files and cookies.
    Best bet would be to call their support number.
    If you have a secure password... then you can use the "unable to view secure web sites" steps in this document to "reset" secure connections:
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=us&docname=bph07138&dlc=en&lc=en&jumpid=reg_R1002_USE...
    ... an HP employee expressing his own opinion.
    Please post rather than send me a Message. It's good for the community and I might not be able to get back quickly. - Thank you.

  • No Valid Digital Signature

    I'm trying to install the latest Itunes, but my computer won't let me becuase it keep saying that the publisher is unknown and the file was blocked becuase it does not have a valid digital signature that verifies it's publisher. I have no clue what to do. I have a Windows XP system.

    These can be frustrating.
    Try restarting your PC.
    Using a different browser.
    There have been reports that this can be due to router problems.
    A simple way round it is to get a friend to download the installer for your and put it on a USB stick.

  • Valid Digital signature - error downloading

    Itunesetup.exe was blocked because it does not have a valid digital signature that verifies its publisher. How do I get around this?

    My neighbor had this problem with her Dell laptop using the operating system Vista. I just installed the service pack 1 and it was able to successfully get Itunes to install.

  • Cant Download Firefox because it has no valid digital signature

    When I try to download firefox 4.0 I can either run or save the setup file, when I "Run" I get an error message saying I cannot download because the creator (FireFox) has no valid digital signature, when I download the setup file to my desktop and try to run from there I get the error telling me the file is Corrupt?

    ok no problem so what i did was i went to the cmd prompt and typed in ipconfig( to get there on vista type cmd in the search in the start window then press enter, in xp type cmd in the run box.) when you press enter you will then need to scroll down and check out what your ip address is. proper ip addresses end in something like ...1.1 or 0.1 if it has any other number then that you need to reset your ip address in your network settings which can be accesed in control panel. and if you have the option click the box that says get ip address automatically. hope that works!

  • I have acrobat 8 and my digital signature has been corrupted. How do I fix that?

    I have acrobat 8 and my digital signature has been corrupted. How do I fix that?

    Make a new one.

  • KeyUsage does not allow digital signatures

    Hello,
    I'm getting the security: KeyUsage does not allow digital signatures error (in java log) when trying to authenticate our web-based java app using a smart card (CAC). The smart card authentication works fine on one test system, but not the other. Both are using the same 'certificate' (we believe). Both have the same IIS 6.0 settings, and same java setting...as well as IE browser settings.
    Visually, the symptom presents itself via the sun java login prompt when clicking the link to load the java app. We have an asp client that works fine. Only our java app is asking for re-authentication. If we manually type the credentials of a system admin, it loads the applet fine. What I can't figure out is, "Why are we getting prompted for a log-in to begin?"
    Note: We have verified that IIS (via IIS logs) that authentication is successful, yet still prompted.
    Here is a snippet of the java log: ----------------------------------
    security: Checking if SSL certificate is in Deployment permanent certificate store
    security: KeyUsage does not allow digital signatures
    Exception in thread "HandshakeCompletedNotify-Thread" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
    at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(Unknown Source)
    at java.util.HashMap$EntryIterator.next(Unknown Source)
    at java.util.HashMap$EntryIterator.next(Unknown Source)
    at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl$NotifyHandshakeThread.run(Unknown Source)
    network: Firewall authentication: site=sditap10086.afsac.wpafb.af.mil/134.136.33.21:443, protocol=https, prompt=, scheme=ntlm
    java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 401 for URL: https://sditap10086.afsac.wpafb.af.mil/report.web/ASP/insight-inpage.jar
    at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getInputStream(Unknown Source)
    Any clues?

    One of the KeyUsage extension bits is DIGITAL_SIGNATURE which in your case has most likely not been enabled so try getting a certificate signed with the DIGITAL_SIGNATURE bit enabled. It would be a good idea to actual have a look at your certificate to see which KeyUsage bits are enabled and whether the KeyUsage extension is set as critical or not. If the extension is defined as critical, then all the bits have to be followed, whereas if it is not critical, then the bits can be ignored and it depends on the API used on whether they enforce what the bits say.

  • ServerAdmin and Valid Digital Signatures

    How does one setup an XServer so that it issues a valid digital signature?
    I'm attempting to enforce a requirement for valid digital signatures within ServerAdmin.
    Any help or pointers to relevant documentation is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Carl.

    OK, a little more digging around reveals some information on page 147 of the Server Administration Manual.
    For the moment, this looks like my question has been answered!?
    Carl.

  • Persona not validated in signature

    Good afternoon!
    So I'm having an issue with a digital signature for one of our personnel and this is apparently the way to get support.
    We are having issues with people rejecting her digital signature because on the right hand side it says persona not validated.. Is there a way to make that go away, so that the persona is validated? I believe I have checked all my revocations and trusts and everything appears fine but doesn't mean I didn't miss something..
    We are using Adobe Acrobat Standard 11
    Debbie test.png - Google Drive

    Hi kihomachelpdesk,
    TSN is correct, this is not tech support, but in this one case you've have gotten a hold of Adobe anyways. 
    The name that you see in the textual portion of the digital signature appearance (the right half of the signature field) is the value of the CN (common name) entry in the Subject extension of the digital ID used to create the digital signature. You need to procure for Ms. Leonard a digital ID from Symantec with a less frightening set of entries in the Subject name. Note that the OU (organizational unit) also says "Persona Not Validated" along with the CN entry. One of the tenets of using a "trusted third-party" to supply the digital ID is it's their job it to have vetted the identity of the end-user to whom they are issuing the digital ID. That way the document recipient (who must physically trust the Symantec Root CA certificate in order for the signature to be valid) is assured the signer is who they say they are (it's known as non-repudiation). My guess is Ms. Leonard obtained a test (or sample) digital ID form Symantec and since Symantec gives those away they don't bother with the identity vetting procedure like they do with digital IDs that are paid for. Since they aren't doing any identity verification they add the "Persona Not Validated" text so the document recipient isn't fooled into the believing the signer is someone that they are not.
    As an aside, you can also make the graphics portion of the signature appearance (the left half of the signature field) look a bit better if you make the background of the signature appearance file transparent (aka removing all background opacity). That way the background won't obliterate the trefoil logo. And if you really want to get fancy you can replace the trefoil with your own company logo.
    Steve

  • Validating digital signatures successfull on Win7 but fails on Vista/XP/W2K3

    Microsoft has announced (Security Advisory 2880823: Recommendation to discontinue use of SHA-1) that
    they will stop recognizing the validity of SHA-1 based certificates after 2016. Microsoft started to sign their files with digital signatures which use the stronger SHA-2 hashing algorithm. For the countersignatures (Time Stamping Authenticode Signatures)
    they also use SHA-256. These certificates can be validated fine on Windows 7/8 but can't be validated on Windows Vista, Windows XP and Windows Server 2003R2. The status of certificates in the Certification Path are OK but on the older operating systems the
    countersignature seem to be missing... See the forum thread
    EMET 4.1 Update 1: 'The digital signature of the object did not verify.' on Vista/XP in the
    Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET) Support Forum for several screenshots.
    Can someone explain this behavior and maybe provide a solution?
    W. Spu

    Hi,
    It looks like it is related with this
    https://technet.microsoft.com/library/security/2749655
    This issue might be caused by a missing timestamp Enhanced Key Usage (EKU) extension during certificate generation and signing of Microsoft core components and software.
    Microsoft is aware of an issue involving specific digital certificates that were generated by Microsoft without proper timestamp attributes. These digital certificates were later used to sign some Microsoft core components and software binaries. This
    could cause compatibility issues between affected binaries and Microsoft Windows. While this is not a security issue, because the digital signature on files produced and signed by Microsoft will expire prematurely, this issue could adversely impact the ability
    to properly install and uninstall affected Microsoft components and security updates.
    So have you applied this update on XP\Vista\Server 2003?
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2749655
    This update will help to ensure the continued functionality of all software that was signed with a specific certificate that did not use a timestamp Enhanced Key Usage (EKU) extension. To extend their functionality, WinVerifyTrust will ignore the lack of
    a timestamp EKU for these specific X.509 signatures.
    Yolanda Zhu
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • Map app issue

    3gs map app in 5.1.1 works great, 4S and ipad 2 With 6.1 map dont work trying to give direction from point A to Point B..it will be fix? thanks

  • Have songs duplicated on phone how do i remove

    I have songs on my Iphone that say are linked to a url how do i get rid of them as the screw up my shuffle

  • Illustrator and Photoshop CS6 install error EX20

    When installing Illustrator and Photoshop CS6 I receive the error EX20.  In looking at the installation log file there is warning DF029.  Suggestions?

  • Faces is now a per-Library setting

    According to this KB article: Faces In Aperture, it is possible to turn off faces on a per-library basis. I'm still seeing the old preferences checkbox, but having turned it off in one Library and opened another, the checkbox was checked.  So apparen

  • Forgot my sub-account user name AND password

    As the admin on the account, why do I not have access to the username on sub accounts? I am trying to see the emails for a sub-account that I set up, but I forgot the username and the password for the account. Is there anyway that I can acess the sub