Adding AV/AS Rule for AVG 9

A while back I had TAC send me instructions for adding custom AV rule for AVG 8. I seem to have misplaced those (they're not lost - I just can't find em). Can someone post the steps that I will need to add AVG 9 as a custom rule for NAC? Thanks in advance.

OK...This what you need to manually add the rules for AVG 9
If you just want to allow them if Avg9 is installed you can create a new registry check.
Device Management -> Clean Access -> Clean Access Agent -> Rules -> New Check.
Check Category: Registry Check
Check Type: Registry Key
Registry Key: HKLM : SOFTWARE\Avg\Avg9
Operator: exists
Choose your Operating Systems
Check the box to create a rule based on the new check.
Under your existing AV Requirement the new rule should now
show up under Requirement-Rules.
In order to check the AV Definitions as being current we can add :
Check Category: File Check
Check Type: File Date
File Path: SYSTEM_DRIVE : \Program Files\Avg\Avg9\sc.dat
Operator: later than
File Date: Cam date - 5 days
File Date Type: Modification date
Select Your OS' and Automatically create a rule based on the check.
Add this check to your existing AV definition requirement rules and make sure you have
"Any Select Rule Succeeds chosen.

Similar Messages

  • What is the rule for adding application elements to faces-config.xml

    I have posed this question before, but was unable to get an answer so here goes again.
    What is the rule for adding more than one application element to the faces-config.xml?
    The schema documents that 1-n are possible, but why and when should I do this?
    --W                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

    sorry if you don't login in tomcat administration before. you must enter login and password of a manager user on tomcat .
    The user is the one you give when installing tomcat.
    If you have forgotten it : see it to: C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 6.0\conf\tomcat_users.xml
    and choose one whop have role='manager'

  • REMSH unix command issues when adding rule for port 514

    Has anyone experienced any issues with Unix systems when adding rules to WAAS for port 514? This is the port RCOPY uses and is not handled by WAAS by default. We created a rule for port 514 but when we implement any type of optimization (even TFO Only) we start having problems with REMSH. This is used in one of our production scripts that normally take 10 minutes to run. When we apply the rule for port 514 the time goes as high as 45 minutes.
    We wrote a test script that uses just the REMSH command and with out the 514 rule works fine but with the 514 rule goes down the tubes.
    Just to add a little more information, I do not see an entry under Monitor/ Connection Statistics with the servers in question when the test script is running so am not sure where to go from here. I know there is a way to do a TCP capture from the WAAS so figure that will be the next step to see what is causing the issues.
    Thoughts?? Ideas?? Suggestions??

    Well TAC came back with a answer. They found other people with the same issue.
    "It was found that the applications always used the same source and destination TCP ports. WAAS has the first connection in a "WAIT-CLOSE" state so when the next packet comes in with the same ports it is dropped." , "A defect was opened for this issue, but has not been fixed yet."
    He wanted us to do a packet capture but after finding these other tickets decided it would be a waste of time and only tell us we are having a similar issue as others.
    Still waiting on a suggested work around or a patch, 4.15 is suppose to come out soon but haven't heard if it will fix the problem.
    With the new information I don't think even putting 514 in pass-through will fix the issue.
    I will let you know if I hear anything else.

  • What are rule for adding names to photos?

    what are rule for adding names to photos in iphoto?

    Since your profile indicates you have a Mac, I am guessing you are asking how to add a face name using iPhoto on your Mac.
    You would open the photo in iPhoto, click "Info" on the bottom, and then the "Faces" tab on the right.
    Once you have added the face name in iPhoto on your Mac, once you sync the photo to your iPhone, the name will appear there as well.

  • [SOLVED]system fails to boot since adding udev rules for automounting

    Hello
    I have recently been trying to use udev rules to automount, and putting together stuff from the wiki, forums and general googling around have produced the following set of rules:
    # automounts usb hdd and pendrives as usbhd-sdx; no messing around with
    # volume labels or other confusing stuff
    # matches all sdx devices except the internal hdd, sda
    KERNEL=="sd[b-z]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK+="usbhd-%k", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    # imports filesystem information
    ACTION=="add", IMPORT{program}="/sbin/blkid -o udev -p %N"
    # creates mount points and sets up symlinks
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", SYMLINK+="usbhd-%k", GROUP="users", NAME="%k"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/mkdir -p /media/usbhd-%k"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/ln -s /media/usbhd-%k /mnt/usbhd-%k"
    # global mount options
    ACTION=="add", ENV{mount_options}="relatime"
    # filesystem-specific mount options (777/666 dir/file perms for ntfs/vfat)
    ACTION=="add", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="vfat|ntfs", ENV{mount_options}="$env{mount_options},gid=100,dmask=000,fmask=111,utf8"
    # automount ntfs filesystem with ntfs-3g driver
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="ntfs", RUN+="/bin/mount -t ntfs-3g -o %E{mount_options} /dev/%k /media/usbhd-%k", OPTIONS="last_r$
    # automount all other file systems
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="ntfs", RUN+="/bin/mount -t auto -o %E{mount_options} /dev/%k /media/usbhd-%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    # unmounts and removes the mount points
    ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/rm -f /mnt/usbhd-%k"
    ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/umount -l /media/usbhd-%k"
    ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/rmdir /media/usbhd-%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    This seemed to be working very well unitl I tried to boot this morning and the boot process stopped at "processing UDev events" with the following message:
    iTCO_wdt: Unexpected close, not stopping watchdog!
    It pauses at this point for 10-15 seconds and then reboots.
    Having searched a bit, I found the following similar post on the forums:  http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=459375
    Which suggests that the problem might lie with this line:
    ACTION=="add", IMPORT{program}="/sbin/blkid -o udev -p %N"
    I have renamed the file so that it no longer has the udev .rules extension and now the system boots fine.  Does anyone have any suggestions as to why the above rules might be causing this behaviour and how I might go about fixing it?
    Thanks
    Last edited by useradded (2010-07-02 22:58:14)

    Hey falconindy
    That was the final kick up the logical a$$ that I needed to get some kind of grip on udev rules.  I now have a fully functional rule that applies only to /dev/sdxy and not to everything else as well, so no more boot trauma, THANK YOU.
    I will mark this thread as solved and post my new rule for the benefit of anyone who might read this.
    New rule (no boot problems):
    # automounts usb hdd and pendrives as label or as usbhd-sdxy if no label present
    # ensures the following is _only_ run for sdxy devices excluding internal hdd, sda
    KERNEL!="sd[b-z][0-9]", GOTO="personal_usb_automount_settings_end"
    # imports filesystem information
    # provides access to following variables:
    # ID_FS_UUID; ID_FS_UUID_ENC; ID_FS_VERSION; ID_FS_TYPE; ID_FS_VERSION; ID_FS_LABEL
    # accessible via ENV{variable}; $env{variable}|%E{variable}
    IMPORT{program}="/sbin/blkid -o udev -p %N"
    # Get a label if present, otherwise name usbhd-%k
    ENV{ID_FS_LABEL}!="", ENV{dir_name}="%E{ID_FS_LABEL}"
    ENV{ID_FS_LABEL}=="", ENV{dir_name}="usbhd-%k"
    # creates mount points and sets up symlinks
    ACTION=="add", SYMLINK+="%E{dir_name}", GROUP="users", NAME="%k"
    ACTION=="add", RUN+="/bin/mkdir -p /media/%E{dir_name}"
    ACTION=="add", RUN+="/bin/ln -s /media/%E{dir_name} /mnt/%E{dir_name}"
    # global mount options
    ACTION=="add", ENV{mount_options}="relatime"
    # filesystem-specific mount options (777/666 dir/file perms for ntfs/vfat)
    ACTION=="add", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="vfat|ntfs", ENV{mount_options}="$env{mount_options},gid=100,dmask=000,fmask=111,utf8"
    # automount ntfs filesystem with ntfs-3g driver
    ACTION=="add", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="ntfs", RUN+="/bin/mount -t ntfs-3g -o %E{mount_options} /dev/%k /media/%E{dir_name}", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    # automount all other file systems
    ACTION=="add",ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="ntfs", RUN+="/bin/mount -t auto -o %E{mount_options} /dev/%k /media/%E{dir_name}", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    # unmounts and removes the mount points
    ACTION=="remove", RUN+="/bin/rm -f /mnt/%E{dir_name}"
    ACTION=="remove", RUN+="/bin/umount -l /media/%E{dir_name}"
    ACTION=="remove", RUN+="/bin/rmdir /media/%E{dir_name}", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    # exit
    LABEL=="personal_usb_automount_settings_end"
    Last edited by useradded (2010-07-02 22:59:20)

  • Data not coming from DOE to Mobile After defining Rule for device attribute

    Hi All,
    I have created a DO and rule for it.In case of Bulk Rule for all definition when i triggere extract from Portal then all the data comes to outbound queue but when i define rule for Device attribute then no data comes to my Outboun queue.Here is the scenario what i am doing :
    1. I have order header in my backend which has a field named "Work_Center" and this will be criteria field.
    2. In CDS table i have all the records for all the work center.
    3. Now in RMM under customized , i have added an attribute named "Work_center".
    4. Now i defined a rule with Device attribute mapping and activated the rule.
    5. Now on Portal i assigned this data object and in the device attribute tab i assigned the value(this value exist in CDS table for few orders) of a   Work center to the attribute "Work_Center" .
    6. Then i triggrere extract but its Outbound queue is empty, what could be the reason.
    Is my approach is correct
    Regards,
    Abhishek

    Hi Abhishek,
    You can check one ore thing, after you have performed all the steps till step 5, i.e. just before triggering
    extract. Check if the AT table for ur DO has entries based on the criteria specified by you...
    1. In the workbench click on the Data Object, and then right click and select "View Metadata".
    2. Select Distribution Model tab.
    3. Now select your DO's Association table.
    4. For the input field DEVICE ID specify your corresponing device id,and also for status field specify it 
        as "I"  and execute
    If there are any entries now in the AT table, and on triggering extract if they are not coming to the
    outbound Q there is some EXTRACT Q blocked. And is there were no entries in the AT then the rule
    specified is not  the satifying.
    Thanks,
    Swarna
    Now if you have entries w

  • Error while maintaining the Update Rules for the Infostructure

    Hi,
    I have added 2 new characteristics for the existing infostructure S9xx and executed the same. While maintaining the Update Rules for the same, system is giving the error message 1. "Field 'PARVW' unknown" and 2. Error generating program RMCX0011.
    Please guide me in resolving the issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kumar.

    Hi,
    This is with reference to my earlier question that an error is occuring while maintaining the update rules for the existing Infostructure.
    Solution provider for this will be rewarded with good points.
    Regards,
    Kumar.

  • Business rule for Essbase cube calculations in 11.1.1.3?

    Hi,
    Can we use business rules to use @XREF from data transfer from one cube to other cube.Why I went for business rule is, I can put set of business rules in a Sequence and any new user can run this Sequence on demand and even we need prompt also in that.
    So, I want to clarify whether I can use the business rules for Essbase calculations along with calc scripts??
    Appreciate the response.
    Thanks

    Right,
    Actually, Business rules are running essbase cubes in every case.
    Remember planning and BRs are adding extra layers like prompts, forms, security, processes...
    Think Business rules are extended version of calc scripts with some more functionality. They are ultimately running on essbase cubes...
    Regards,
    Ahmet

  • Reapply Rules for existing users

    Hello All IDMers;
    We have a group called Seasonal for which the member access is based on rule that has two fields one is set to true and also based on employee type which is "Seasonal".
    There are other users who are of different emp type BUT with the other field set to true.
    Now what we decided is to put all those who have field set to true into the this group irrespective of their employee type.
    So going forward for new users we can easily implement this because I am going to delete the Emp Type = Seasonal condition from Rule designer.
    But Can you please tell me if there is a easy way jus by using design or admin console to apply this condition to all existing users.
    I hope i didnt confuse you all.
    Regards;
    VSN

    oh.. my bad. I looked mainly the Subject and was thinking about the rules all the time...
    In your case, you can use the following function to add a user to a group. Please check in the Forum, there are lot of sample code for searching a user with a particular attribute value - then if you have the user key and group key, then you can use the below function to
    Map usermap = new HashMap();
    usermap.put("Users.User ID", User_id );
    usermap.put("Users.Status", "Active"); //put only active users in the hashmap
    Map grpmap = new HashMap();
    grpmap.put("Groups.Group Name", Group_Name);
    tcResultSet ts = userClient.findUsers(usermap); //find users - to get the ukey
    tcResultSet tg = groupClient.findGroups(grpmap); //find requireq group
    long ukey = ts.getLongValue("Users.Key");
    long gkey = tg.getLongValue("Groups.Key"); //find group key
    System.out.println("User Map: " + ts);
    System.out.println("User Key: " + ukey);
    System.out.println("Group Key: " + gkey);
    int usrNumRec = ts.getRowCount(); //get number of all user records in OIM
    System.out.println("There are: " + usrNumRec + " user records in OIM Dev");
    //ADD the Member now
    groupClient.addMemberUser(gkey,ukey); //add user back to a group
    System.out.println("GROUP Added");
    Search in google for the OIM functions such as addMemberUser - you will find better code in this forum or somewhere else...
    Regards
    Vijay Chinnasamy

  • [PKGBUILD] new rulez for the creation

    Hi,
    I'll be perhaps a new users.
    I was looking for a new linux distrib, I come from slackware then freebsd, tried Gentoo for a long, but not satisfied
    I'm want sources+packages, and find out that Arch could the one
    I've looked to pacman, abs, etc., I've looked to some PKGBUILD, and notice there wasn't any (perhaps wrong) options that could be pass in order to modify a bit the way packages are build from sources, as it's done in FreeBSD.
    I don't want something like gentoo USE flags, too much options I think, and some are not really usefull.
    I've read the rules for the creating PKGBUILD, and here is my idea (sur not the only one, don't blame me if it was already discuss and rejected).
    I think we can put some predefined variables within the packages, those variables are independant from the installed packages, except if they need the installation of an extra package for dependencies. (for FreeBSD users, it's exactly what is done in the ports). By default the behaviour is the one define by the maintainer.
    To illustrate I've modify a bit the vim PKGBUILD :
    Original :
    # $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.19 2005/06/22 02:37:09 judd Exp $
    # Maintainer: judd <[email protected]>
    pkgname=vim
    pkgver=6.3
    pkgrel=5
    pkgdesc="VIM - Vi IMproved console"
    url="http://www.vim.org"
    depends=('glibc' 'ncurses')
    backup=(etc/vimrc)
    source=(ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unix/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.bz2
    vim.patch filetype.patch)
    md5sums=('821fda8f14d674346b87e3ef9cb96389' '386938c7bd7890b7d1900615f40ee9a7'
    '916fd94f2546007c637ad08e88400d1a')
    build() {
    cd $startdir/src/vim63
    patch -Np1 -i ../vim.patch || return 1
    patch -Np1 -i ../filetype.patch || return 1
    cd src
    ./configure --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var/lib/$pkgname
    --disable-gpm --with-x=no --enable-gui=no --enable-multibyte
    --enable-cscope
    # --enable-perlinterp --enable-pythoninterp --enable-rubyinterp
    make CPPFLAGS=-DSYS_VIMRC_FILE="/etc/vimrc" VIMRTDIR= auto/pathdef.c
    make CPPFLAGS=-DSYS_VIMRC_FILE=\"/etc/vimrc\" VIMRTDIR= || return 1
    make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg VIMRTDIR= install
    cd $startdir/pkg/usr/bin
    ln -sf vim vi
    mkdir -p $startdir/pkg/etc
    cp $startdir/pkg/usr/share/vim/vimrc_example.vim $startdir/pkg/etc/vimrc
    My proposal :
    # $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.19 2005/06/22 02:37:09 judd Exp $
    # Maintainer: judd <[email protected]>
    pkgname=vim
    pkgver=6.3
    pkgrel=5
    pkgdesc="VIM - Vi IMproved console"
    url="http://www.vim.org"
    depends=('glibc' 'ncurses')
    if [ ! -z $WITH_PERL ];then
    depends=($depends 'perl')
    fi
    if [ ! -z $WITH_PYTHON ];then
    depends=($depends 'python')
    fi
    if [ ! -z $WITH_RUGBY ];then
    depends=($depends 'ruby')
    fi
    backup=(etc/vimrc)
    source=(ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unix/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.bz2
    vim.patch filetype.patch)
    md5sums=('821fda8f14d674346b87e3ef9cb96389' '386938c7bd7890b7d1900615f40ee9a7'
    '916fd94f2546007c637ad08e88400d1a')
    build() {
    cd $startdir/src/vim63
    patch -Np1 -i ../vim.patch || return 1
    patch -Np1 -i ../filetype.patch || return 1
    cd src
    PKGBUILDOPTIONS=""
    if [ ! -z $WITH_PERL ];then
    PKGBUILDOPTIONS="$PKGBUILDOPTIONS --enable-perlinterp"
    fi
    if [ ! -z $WITH_PYTHON ];then
    PKGBUILDOPTIONS="$PKGBUILDOPTIONS --enable-pythoninterp"
    fi
    if [ ! -z $WITH_RUGBY ];then
    PKGBUILDOPTIONS="$PKGBUILDOPTIONS --enable-pythoninterp"
    fi
    ./configure --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var/lib/$pkgname
    --disable-gpm --with-x=no --enable-gui=no --enable-multibyte
    --enable-cscope $PKGBUILDOPTIONS
    # --enable-perlinterp --enable-pythoninterp --enable-rubyinterp
    make CPPFLAGS=-DSYS_VIMRC_FILE="/etc/vimrc" VIMRTDIR= auto/pathdef.c
    make CPPFLAGS=-DSYS_VIMRC_FILE=\"/etc/vimrc\" VIMRTDIR= || return 1
    make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg VIMRTDIR= install
    cd $startdir/pkg/usr/bin
    ln -sf vim vi
    mkdir -p $startdir/pkg/etc
    cp $startdir/pkg/usr/share/vim/vimrc_example.vim $startdir/pkg/etc/vimrc
    No modification needed to abs or pacman or anything else.
    no more need, create our own PKGBUILD in order to get some usefull options, the default behaviour is still the same.
    Are we allowed to do that (I've seen that the less we use vars the better it is)
    I think there could be a rule to define the use of such can of vars, in order to prevent getting to much options like gentoo.
    I hope I was clear, waiting for your suggestion

    baptux wrote:I think if it's written as a rule, and every maintainer follow this rule, there won't be any problem nor a hudge number of options
    it's just that simple! ok everyone, get to work!
    baptux, this isn't going to happen.  it doesn't make sense in Arch.  I think this happens about twice a month "Hey, I found this neat feature in distro X and want to shoe-horn it into Arch!!" and then a few weeks later, that user is never heard from again.
    PKGBUILDs are made to be simple and straightforward.  Can you imagine a package with, say, 20 of your "arch-flags" (you seem offended when I call them use flags, which is exactly what they are)? And what about, say, adding an "arch-flag" to vim which also requires a recompile of, say, cscope? now you get into the realm of cyclic recompiles... ok, so I want to "use" feature "Z" with vim, which requires cscope to be recompiled to support feature "Y", but feature "Y" requires perl to be installed, and also compiled with feature "Z"... it's just too complicated...
    The Arch Way wrote:If you try to hide the complexity of the system, you'll end up with more complex system.
    You're trying to extrapolate configuration options made by developers to a system which anyone can use like switches without knowing the full impact (i.e. USE=gtk emerge vim, ENABLE_GTK=y makepkg, etc).  This is how you get from 150 lines (xorg PKGBUILD) to 3000+ lines (xorg ebuild).
    It's too impractical and goes against the standard arch mantra of simplicity and the KISS philosophy.
    I'll use a real example based on the PKGBUILD you've changed: in my entire time I've been with arch, no one has ever complained "why isn't vim compiled with option X??" people who cared (like myself) simply used abs to get the PKGBUILD, added "--enable-pythoninterp" at the right place and ran "makepkg -i" - problem solved... no wacky "arch-flags", no excess work on the package maintainers... it's simple, and simplicity rules here

  • You have not maintained a rule for the fiscal year variant

    1) I have Fiscal Year Variant in the Cube ( it got added along with fiscal year ) but there is no Fiscal year variant in the datasource & when I dont map it Transformation activation prompts error " You have not maintained a rule for the fiscal year variant ".
    Can I just delete Fiscal year variant from the cube..does it matter?
    2) Fiscal year & Posting Period can be populated from Fiscal Period, is the vice versa possible..? Does the sytem will take care of the conversion..?

    1. no, you should not delete and you cannot delete fiscal year variant from cube, it's required by fiscal year/ period (compound infoobject), you should add it in your datasource, or you can map with a constant value e.g K4
    2. yes, fiscal period can be populated by posting period
    some info on time characteristic relationtionship
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/44/be8b631c743959e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    hope this helps.

  • Create Rule for "Boolean" field attribute

    Hi all,
    I'm having a problem creating a Rule which references the value from a Checkbox in my User Form (hence, Boolean).
    I know how to create Rule to reference string values. But, apparently, the syntax is not the same when referencing a *"checkbox*" value.
    Here is the Rule I created :
    *<Rule name='Rule for Checkbox'>*
    *<switch>*
    *<ref>checkboxvalue</ref>*
    *<case>*
    *<isTrue>*
    *<ref>checkboxvalue</ref>*
    *</isTrue>*
    *<setvar name='MyTextField'>*
    *<s>Yes</s>*
    *</setvar>*
    *</case>*
    *<case>*
    *<isFalse>*
    *<ref>checkboxvalue</ref>*
    *</isFalse>*
    *<setvar name='MyTextField'>*
    *<s>No</s>*
    *</setvar>*
    *</case>*
    *</switch>*
    *<MemberObjectGroups>*
    *<ObjectRef type='ObjectGroup' id='#ID#Top' name='Top'/>*
    *</MemberObjectGroups>*
    *</Rule>*
    In other words : if the Checkbox in my User Form is ticked (meaning, if the value is TRUE), then IDM should automatically allocate a value of "*YES"* to that text field in my user form *(MyTextField)*
    If the checkbox is not ticked, then the value of *"NO"* should be displayed in the Text Field.
    Is my syntax wrong?
    Thanks

    It depends on how you're generating the email. If you use a workflow it is relatively easy.
    Change the rule to (note that I added the rule argument, it's not really necessary, it just cleans the code up):
    <Rule name='Get To Address'>
        <RuleArgument name="boxvalue"/>
         <cond>
             <isTrue>
                 <ref>boxvalue</ref>
             </isTrue>
             <s>[email protected]</s>
             <s>[email protected], [email protected]</s>
         </cond>
    <MemberObjectGroups>
        <ObjectRef type='ObjectGroup' id='#ID#Top' name='Top'/>
    </MemberObjectGroups>
    </Rule>Using the workflow service directly.
    <Activity>
        <Variable name="to">
            <!-- this assumes the checkboxvalue variable is already set -->
            <rule name="Get To Address">
              <argument name="boxvalue">
                  <ref>checkboxvalue</ref>
              </argument>
            </rule>
        </Variable>
      <Action id='0' application='com.waveset.provision.WorkflowServices'>
        <Argument name='op' value='notify'/>
        <Argument name='template' value='yourtemplate'/>
        <Argument name='to' value='$(to)'/>
        <Argument name="from" value="[email protected]"/>
        <Argument name="some_template_argument">
            <s>some value</s>
        </Argument>
        <Argument name='catch' value='notificationException'/>
      </Action>
    </Activity>Using the notify workflow subprocess is nearly identical. (I recommend this because retries are taken care of for you but it's up to you.)
    Finally your template is simple again. IDM should fill in the to value on based on the "to" variable you provided in the "to" argument. The "to" variable in turn was set by the rule.
    <EmailTemplate
    id="#ID#EmailTemplate:yourtemplate"
    name='yourtemplate'
    smtpHost='$(smtpHost)' 
    htmlEnabled='false'
    authEnabled='$(authEnabled)'
    userId='$(userId)'
    password='$(password)'
    ssl='$(ssl)'
    ignoreCert='$(ignoreCert)'>
    <!-- IDM provides the above values -->
      <subject>Your Subject</subject>
      <body>
    Hello.  The argument was $(some_template_argument).
    </body>
      <MemberObjectGroups>
        <ObjectRef type='ObjectGroup' id='#ID#All' name='All'/>
      </MemberObjectGroups>
    </EmailTemplate>

  • WMS PICK Rule for WIP Comp Pick Release

    Hello,
    I want to use WMS Pick rule for picking only some parts using com pick release.
    Scenario: I have a FG item which has routing operations at 10,20 30 respt.
    During comp pick release I want to pick only those comp which are used at op seq 10.
    i.e Allocation should happen only for parts required at op seq 10, parts at other stations needs to be unallocated.
    Can I tried to define WMS Pick rule using WIP requirement and Operation Sequence in criteria but not able to allocate only parts at op seq 10.
    In WCB I can see all tasks.
    Pick Rule
                WIP Requirements  Operation Sequence Number >= Constant number 10
    AND    WIP Requirements  Operation Sequence Number < Constant number    20
    AND    WIP Job                 Status type                        =  Constant number       3
    Also in Rules Workbench this rule has been added and assigned to transaction source as Job/Schedule
    Please advise if I am missing anysetups.
    Regards,
    Tushar

    In Rules Workbench  transaction source needs to be inventory instead of Job/Schedule

  • Error in global conversion rule for 0DOC_CATEG

    Hi Friends,
    My transfer rules are inactive for 2LIS_11_VAITM. When i tried to get activate i am getting the below error message...
    Error in global conversion rule for 0DOC_CATEG
    How i can activate the transfer rules.
    is there any global routine for this infoobject.
    Please suggest a solution.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anand

    Hi Reddy,
    Goto Change mode of the info object 0DOC_CATEG. Just edit the description of 0DOC_CATEG by adding a "." and activate it.
    Again change the description by removing the "." and activate the info object.
    After doing this, activate the transfer rules. It'll work fine.
    -- Selva

  • Crawl Rule for Crawling Specific Page across all the site collection under one content source

    I have a MOSS 2007 web Application added to SharePoint 2010 Search Service Application Content Source, which is having 50+ Site Collections which follows same template. Every Site collection having one CustomPages Library and CustomPage.aspx. 
    If search Service would like to crawl only CustomPage.aspx from all the site collection under the web application, what would be the Path or Regular expression while creating the Crawl Rule. 
    i have given the path as  http://webapplication/sites/*/CustomPages/CustomPage.aspx, but this is not working. Can anyone help me out with correct path or regular expression in this case.
    Thanks..

    To crawl that page you'd also need to crawl the pages beneath it, otherwise SharePoint will never get to the page to check if it matches a rule. I assume you have some other rules that are blocking the rest of the content of the site?
    Try adding another rule that allows http://webapplication/sites/* then have your include rule beneath that and another exclude rule for
    http://webapplication/sites/*/* beneath that. That should eliminate nearly all the other content and provide you with your custompage.aspx results.

Maybe you are looking for