ADMIRAL database on SQL 2008 R2 Named Instance

Hi,
we are running TES 6.1.0.133 (test Master) upon a remote SQL 2005 SP4 named instance database, all is right.
I need to move the ADMIRAL database to an SQL 2008 R2 SP1 named instance.
What JDBC, JRE and connection string do I need to succeed ?
The versions are JRE 1.6.0.30, Microsoft JDBC 4.0.
thank in advance you for your experience,
Frederic

You should probably ask Cisco to help you through this they can likely provide you with an updated document and jar file
You will need to update your master.props settings.
You will need potentially need a new jar
Perform on a maintenance weekend with a maximum amount of recovery time
I have a Cisco doc and Zip files from 2010 when we did this but it is likely a different JAR that you would want to apply now.
What I would think are the Sequence of events (disclaimer Cisco would be best source of sequence, order, etc)
set system queue to zero
close all client sessions
stop master services
kill all connections to Admiral database
backup admiral database
set database offline and rename
Restore admiral database backup to new target SQL server 2008 instances
Creare a backup of master.props
Apply Jar to update master / SQL scripts (if supplied by Cisco)
Update master.props with new settings
JdbcURL=jdbc:sqlserver://:;selectMethod=cursor;databaseName=Admiral (or Admiral DB name)
There could be other setting that may also need to chance
Start Tidal Master make sure it is running
Connect Client
Verify Connections
Turn on System Queue slowly ramp up from a few to your standard level

Similar Messages

MS SQL 2008 R2 Named instance: Login failed. Microsoft SQL server, Error: 18452) - Tryig to access using the FQDN assigned for the backup network card.

Hi,
I have a windows 2008 R2 Enterprise servers with standalone MS-SQL 2008 R2 named instance. The server is having two networks, once production and the second for backup. The server FQDN is resolving to the production IP. The backup NIC
DNS dynamic update is disabled and an "A" record is registered with the dns. While trying to connect to the instance using the management studio:
Successfuly able to connect using the instance name, the production hostname, production IP and backup IP.
but while trying to connect to the insance using the backup hostname getting the below error:
"Login failed. The login is an untrusted domain and cannot be used with windows authentication. (Microsoft SQL server, Error: 18452) "
This is required for the backup tool to get connected using the backup FQDN of the server.
Should I need to create a host name alias, request you to kindly assist me with the best recommedation to fix this.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/archive/2012/05/21/how-to-add-a-hostname-alias-for-a-sql-server-instance.aspx

Hi,
It might be a kerberos issue. Check that there are valid SPN's registered using the setspn utility - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731241.aspx
Thanks, Andrew
My blog...

What is the recommended static port range for SQL Server 2008 to SQL Server 2014 named instance?

I want to assign a static port to SQL Server 2008 to SQL Server 2014 named instance. Should the port be greater than 49151? The following links give contradicting information:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177440(v=sql.105).aspx
Avoid numbers greater than 49151 which Windows might select for other purposes.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345327(v=sql.100).aspx
Port numbers should be assigned from numbers 49152 through 65535
Thanks..

I would still pick a port number below the ephemeral list (dynamic port usage [41952-65535]) as it'll reduce the chances of having a port collision when SQL Server starts up.
Also, I'd stick to lower numbers if possible (<25,000) as some firewalls skew higher port numbers to be more malicious (if heuristics are used).
-Sean
The views, opinions, and posts do not reflect those of my company and are solely my own. No warranty, service, or results are expressed or implied.

Upgrade FIM 2010 R2 Sp1 Databases from SQL 2008 R2 to SQL 2012

Hi,
I want to upgrade my SQL from 2008 R2 to SQL 2012.
FIM Databases
1) FIMService Database
2) FIMSynchronizationService Database
Mentioned above are my FIM databases running on SQL server 2008 R2 . Now I was looking for some article which could tell me if SQL can be upgraded without affecting my existing databases of FIM or if i can move these databases to a new server having SQL
2012
Activity I want to perform : Create a fresh Server of SQL 2012 and move my FIM 2010 databases over it by restoring the backups. but as per the link below it seems not possible!
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/5465.fimilm-how-to-move-the-backend-sql-server-synchronization-service-database.aspx

Hi Shivam,
Please take a look here: Release Notes for Forefront Identity Manager 2010 R2 SP1.
In the table you have tasks to upgrade SQL for FIMService and FIMSych.
FIM Service:
Upgrade FIM Service servers to FIM 2010 R2 SP1
Stop FIM Service on all servers
Backup Database [in case rollback needed]
Upgrade SQL to SQL Server 2012
Start FIM Service on all servers
FIM Synch:
Upgrade FIM Sync to FIM 2010 R2 SP1
Stop FIM Sync
Backup Database [in case rollback needed]
Upgrade SQL to SQL Server 2012
Start FIM Sync
If you are not making in-place upgrade, I would do something like here:
Stop FIM Services
Backup the databases at SQL 2008
Restore backed up databases on SQL 2012
Make sure SQL Agent Jobs are moved (FIMService)
Make sure Broker is enabled on FIMService database
On FIM machines create SQL alias using cliconfg utility. Alias should have the name of "old(sql2008) SQL" and point to new name/instance.
Start FIM Services - they would use "old" name to connect, but it would be translated to new location. So they would start.
If you found my post helpful, please give it a Helpful vote. If it answered your question, remember to mark it as an Answer.

Moving Service Manager Database From SQL 2008 R2 SP2 to SQL 2012 SP1

Hi Guys,
Just looking for some clarification about moving our Service Manager 2012 R2 database to a new SQL Server.
Our Service Manager database is currently on a remote SQL server, shared with other databases, running SQL 2008 R2 SP2. It was originally setup this way as we only deployed Change Management but we are now wanting to deploy everything, fully
utilising SCSM/Orchestrator and Cireson's suite. Due to the limited resources available on that SQL server we are seeing performance issues before even getting it all up and running.
I want to move the Service Manager database to a new dedicated SQL server running SQL 2012 SP1. I am aware of the official DB move procedure but it does not specifically mention moving up SQL versions. I have seen some comments around here that
it is fine to do but some feedback would be good, it is not something I have done before.
All servers in this are fully patched Windows 2008 R2. Also, we do not currently have a Data Warehouse so do not need to worry about that. It was dropped and uninstalled before upgrading to Service Manager 2012 R2 and will be reinstalled after this DB move
using a separate dedicated SQL server.
Thanks, Chris.

As long as your collations and permissions are the same as before it
should not be a problem. That sad i could not find any other documentation saying it's not supported.
I have moved SCSM databases between different SQL-versions before and it has worked fine if the collations etc are correct.
Cheers,
Thomas Strömberg
System Center Specialist
Blog:
Twitter: LinkedIn:
Please remember to 'Propose as answer' if you find a reply helpful

Database Restoring (SQL 2008 R2)

Hi
I am trying to restore a database in SQL 2008 R2 and I am what I am getting instead is an error message that reads, "Too many backup devices specified for backup or restore; only 64 are allowed. RESTORE HEADERONLY is terminating abnormally. (Microsoft
SQL Server, Error: 3205".
Any word on how I can get about this one

Hi,
There is an old KB article and the error message is mostly come with SQL Server 2000. It does not apply for SQL Server 2008, but may be worth a read.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/833710/en-us
Make sure that you backup file is valid. You can run SELECT @@version to determine the version and try restoring the backup file on the compatible one.
Reference:
http://www.vishalpatwardhan.com/2011/03/too-many-backup-devices-specified-for.html
Hope it helps.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

Cannot see new SQL 2008 R2 Express instance on Small Business Server 2011!

Hi,
As it is stated on the subject line, I'm having a problem after I did a new install of SQL 2008 R2 Express and put a new instance on SBS 2011.
I'm developing a new program using SQL 2008 in C# and VB.Net. I have SQL 2008 R2 Express installed on my computer called "MSQL8R2EDATA" on my PC. Now I need to deploy it on SBS 2011 so I can do some testing on other workstations.
I'm currently running Windows 7, 64 bit, and it's named STEVE-PC. The SBS 2011 is named SERVER1, and it's 64 bit as well.
After installation on SERVER1 (SBS 2011), I then fired up SQL Server Configuration Manager and enabled Named Pipes, TCP/IP, and VIA.
After I've completed the SQL Configuration on SERVER1, I went back on my PC (STEVE-PC) and I tried to use Management Studio to connect to the new instance MSQL8R2EDATA on SBS 2011, only problem is, I only see the computer name, not the new instance
I've installed.
Back on SBS 2011 (SERVER1), I've verified that all the protocols are enabled, and the SQL Server Browser is automatically loaded and currently running, as well the MSQL8R2EDATA instance is automatically loaded and running, yet I still cannot see
it from my PC (STEVE-PC). I even switched from dynamic ports to a static port of 64719 (that was what the MSQL8R2EDATA was listening on that port when it was dynamic), and then added new rules to the Windows Firewall for program of the SQLSERVR.EXE, and
for UDP and TCP for port 64719 to "Allow All Connections" for Domain, Private, and Public; yet I still cannot connect SERVER1\MSQL8R2EDATA. I even disabled the firewall and then trying to connect once again to SBS 2001 and it still fails.
In case you're wondering, I left it on port 64719 since there are other active SQL Servers on SBS 2011 (SharePoint, SBSMonitoring, and ACT7).
Interestingly, when I run Management Studio on SBS 2011, I can see STEVE-PC\MSQL8R2EDATA and I'm able to log in and connect to it.
So what's going on here?!? Why am I able to connect to STEVE-PC which is Windows 7 64 from SBS 2011 (SERVER1), but I cannot connect from my computer to that instance on SBS 2011??
I really could use some big time help on this.
EDIT: Sorry for the confusion, but on the Windows Firewall (WF.msc), I did add new rules for incoming connections on:
Program incoming connections to SQLSERVR.EXE
TCP Port 64719
UDP Port 64719
EDIT: To further assist, I have Management Studio installed on the SBS 2011, and I can locally log in and connect to the MSQL8R2DATA on SERVER1 with success. I even tried tcp:SERVER1\MSQL8R2DATA and again it is successful log-in and connection.
Thanks in advance!
Steve

Hi,
Thanks for the response, but I have a question:
Installing SQL Express or SQL Server is not recommended on SBS
2011 because it is a DC, however technically it will work.
I'm a newbie when it comes to SBS 2011 and I'm taking a crash course on the subject. Can you explain to me what you mean by "DC"? Also, why
isn't recommended to install a new instance on SBS 2011?
As I also stated, I've added "New Rules" to the Windows Firewall to allow incoming connections on port 64719 for both TCP and UDP, and I also allowed incoming connections for SQLSERVR.EXE but no joy to connect to the SERVER1\MSQL8R2EDATA.
And yes, I can log-in and connect locally on SERVER1 using Management Studio with success. I even used tcp:SERVER1\MSQL8R2EDATA with the same success. It's my workstation STEVE-PC that fails. If that fails, then the rest of the workstations are going to fail.
Are you suggesting that I put the SQL Server 2008 Express on another workstation and just allow to to be
accessed that way?

Best Practice SQL Alias with Named Instance

Hi
We have a SQL server, "MySQLServerName" with a named instance, "MySQLInstance", running on port "12345".
I've created an SQL alias of "MySQLAlias" pointing to "MySQLServerName" Port on "12345" and it works.
But should I have used "MySQLServerName\MySQLInstance" Port "12345"?
Which is best practice?
Thanks
TJ

As SQL Server named instance supports both static and dynamic ports, i think you can use the port number specified by you. By default, a named instance of SQL Server listens on a dynamic port. For a named instance of SQL Server, the SQL Server Browser service
for SQL Server 2008, SQL Server 2005, or the SQL Server Resolution Protocol (SSRP) for SQL Server 2000 is always used to translate the instance name to a port, regardless of whether the port is static or dynamic. The Browser service or SSRP is never used for
a default instance of SQL Server.
Refer http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823938
Regards, RSingh

Install SQL 2012 sp1 Named Instance on SQL 2008 r2 Cluster

I am attempting to add a 2012 instance to my 2008r2 cluster, but at 'cluster node configuration' step, the drop down for sql server instance name is empty

Hi,
Seems you have worked it out. You can mark the answers accordingly. It will be nice to let thread stay there so other
community members
can benefit from it.
Please let us know if you would like further assistance.
Thanks.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

Cancel or Remove a backup to a database in SQL 2008 R2

I got it, duh it was in the SQL server Agent, just disabled it. Thanks for the help anyways.

Need to delete or disable a configured database backup job on SQL Server 2008 R2.
Configured it in two places, one through the Maintenance Plan and the other one was done by right-clicking the " database" -->selecting Tasks-->Back up and Set a Schedule to run every 2 hours. I need this one canceled or removed and it won't allow me, I went back in and set the schedule to backup for only one day and it still did not stop.
Any Ideas, just want to keep the one created in the Maintenance Plan?
Thanks
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

DI Server - Cannot connect to named instance SQL server database

Hi,
I have developed a small DI server application and want to migrate it to a production server. I keep on getting the Cannot connect to SBOCommon error on login though. I have verified all user names and passwords and the only real difference is that the production environment uses a named instance SQL server eg server\instance setup.
The production DI server will however connect perfectly to the test database (which is NOT a named instance) .
Anyone using DI server against a named instance SQL server or have some other ideas what might cause this?
I use B1WS 1.0 and the version of SBO is 8.00.181..
Jaco

I may have solved the problem, at least partially.
I created a test user with full rights on my test database server and it would also not connect, even though my test database is not a an instance setup.
Then I found this thread [Re: DI Server Always Uses SA to log into MS SQL database even if SOAP packet]
It seems that at my current patch level the user 'sa' is hard coded into the DI server as sql username! I don't have the production server's 'sa' user credentials at present but will test it on Monday. Will also test against 8.8 soon ..

Lync Monitoring Database, Named Instance, Always On

I have a SQL Server 2012 named instance (LYNC_MONITOR) on a specified port which is Always On enabled for deploying LYNC 2012 Monitoring and Reporting. I had moved the databases from another DB server into a Always On AG, which works fine, and set
up Listener on the defined port. My issue comes in when changing the topology. In the topology builder, the requested information is server name and instance (default or named). Well an AG Listener on a specified port is neither of those. If the instance was
actually default, then it would be no problem (but the default instance is SharePoint). So I need to be able to provide the Listener/port combo as the server name without specifying the instance. Currently it's just pointed to the primary node (server/instance).
Does anybody know of a way to get around this? Thanks much.
Tim Hacker

Currently SQL Always On is not supported for Lync 2013. That being said have you looked at setting up a SQL Alias (cliconfg.exe) on the Front Ends? I've used this when the SQL port is not the standard one: http://blogs.technet.com/b/nexthop/archive/2011/04/12/using-lync-server-2010-with-a-custom-sql-server-network-configuration.aspx
Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
Blog
Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

SQLDeveloper cannot connect to SQL Server named instances

I'm trying to connect to a SQL Server 2005 named instance on my local PC but SQLDeveloper is failing to connect as there is no way to specify the named instance on the connection screen.
For comparison I set up a jdbc connection in JDeveloper and
the connection URL which works in JDeveloper is jdbc:jtds:sqlserver://127.0.0.1:8020;instance=WESTERNEUROPE
Without the instance property JDeveloper gets a connection refused

Set up the connection through SQL developer, then exit the software.
For a sqlserver database like GABRIEL\angel
Modify the URL property in the IDEConnections.xml file
<URL>jdbc:jtds:sqlserver://GABRIEL:1433;instance=angel</URL>
You cannot use Windoze authenrication, and will need a SQL Server named user to connect.

SQL 2012 database behaves differently with a unique index and ignore_dup_key = on when inserting data. It works on SQL 2008 db

If you have a table with a unique index and ignore_dup_key = on and you INSERT rows into that table with an ORDER BY clause (because you want to control which of the duplicate
key rows gets inserted), the wrong row gets inserted in SQL2012. It works correctly in SQL 2008.
We have recently migrated a database from SQL 2008 to SQL 2012. We do have few other dbs which are in compatability mode 100. The above operation works fine
in SQL 2008 dbs but not SQL 2012.
I've even tried applying the latest patch for SQL 2012 SP2 with CU2. Still the problem exists. I'm going to call MS support, but want to know if anyone has come across this problem ?

The MS documentation doesn't guarantee that the first row of the duplicates will always be inserted and the next duplicate row(s) get(s) ignored. Where did you find it in the MS documentation? I think you were just lucky that it was always inserting the
first row in SQL 2008 (and ignoring the rest of the duplicates) - I don't think this is guaranteed
Satish Kartan http://www.sqlfood.com/

Migrating SCCM 2007 R2 database to SQL 2012

Am I able to migrate my SCCM 2007 R2 database from SQL 2008 (running in 2005 compatibility mode) to SQL 2012? Is it even supported to run a 2012 instance with compatibility set to 2005? Or will I need to upgrade the database at some point to get this to
work.
Currently, my attempts fail and the errors in the ConfigMgrSetup.log suggests an issue with compatibility:
Incorrect syntax near '99900'. : ins_upd
Incorrect syntax near '99901'. : ins_upd
-which led me to a hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2676776) that, upon installing, indicated that it failed to completely install.
For whatever it's worth, the SCCM server is running 2008 x64 and the SQL server is 2008 R2.

See the caveats at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee344146.aspx listed under the SQL Server Site Database Configurations section:
"To use SQL Server 2012 to host the site database, you must install the following updates as described in the Microsoft
Knowledge Base:
Article 2676737
Article 2676776
Additionally, to use SQL Server 2012 for the site database, you must upgrade the instance of SQL Server in use at a site from SQL Server 2008 or SQL Server 2008 R2 to SQL Server 2012. It is not supported to install a new Configuration
Manager 2007 SP2 site with SQL Server 2012. It is also not supported to install Configuration Manager 2007 R3 when SQL Server 2012 is in already in use for the site database."
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

ADMIRAL database on SQL 2008 R2 Named Instance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for