Aging Report Problem
Dear all SAP expert,
I have a question about aging report for business partner. I want to know what is the difference between Aging Report with option "display reconciled transaction" check and Aging report with un check option "display reconciled transaction" ?
If I compared with Balance sheet, the report that has same balance with Balance sheet is Aging Report with option "display reconciled transaction" check but in this report include all transaction like Invoice, Incoming payment etc that's make aging report contain all transaction. I want to use the other aging report with uncheck option that show only open transaction but it has difference balance with balance sheet.
Why it's different ?
Thanks for yiur kind help
What parameters are you using to extract the GL balance? Use no From date, and a To date that is the same as the To Date in your Balance Sheet report.
In the aging report, make sure you are using the same posting date to date as the aging date, and have no Posting date from, so you are not excluding any transactions.
If you are finding your balance from drilling to Account Balance in the Chart of Accounts, make sure you are viewing all transactions, not just unreconciled transactions, as this will exclude items reconciled after the required date.
I know there was a bug with this early on in 2007A, but I'm sure it was fixed before PL30
Similar Messages
-
Customer (or Vendor) Ageing Report Problem
Dear Experts,
Firstly, Glad to be before you.
Here, we have developed tht ageing report for Customers and Vendors.In which the Partial payment line item (let us say A) against an Invoice (lets say X) is not being shown under the same age of Invoice Line Item.
For example:
Scenario 1)
Let me say that the Payment Terms 'Z001' under which the line Items fall due only after 30 days.
I have posted an invoice on 01.09.2011 with Rs. 20000
If we run the Ageing as on 16.12.2011, the output is projected as follows:
============================================Days in Arrears
0-20--20-4040-60--
60-80
Line Item X (Invoice)----
20000
Total Balance agewise:--000--
20000
Here for Invoice NO PROBLEM is being raised, as the Invoice Posting Date is taken as the Baseline Date from which the Ageing will be calculated based on Payment terms assigned to Customer in the master data.
But the Proble is when we do partial payment:
Scenario 2)
Let me Take the same example:
Let me say that the Payment Terms 'Z001' under which the line Items fall due only after 30 days.
I have posted an invoice on 01.09.2011 with Rs. 20000 (Due by 77 days as on 16.12.2011)
We have received payment of 8000 against the invoice, on 22.09.2011 (due by 55 days as on 16.12.2011)
now the Ageing report is ran on same 16.12.2011, for which the output is as follows:
============================================Days in Arrears
0-20--20-4040-60--
60-80
Line Item X (Invoice) -
20000
Line Item Y (Partial Pyment)----
(8000)
Total Balance agewise:--00(8000)--
20000
As per Technical logic whats happenning is correct. Because the Base Line date of the partial payment line Item is being picked from the posting date of the same. BUT NOW, THE REQUIREMENT IS AS FOLLOW:
The wants to see the related Partial payment items also in the same AGE in the report. i.e., we should make the system pick the Baseline date of the partial payment line item(Y) from the posting date(01.09.2011) of the other line item(X) i.e., from the Invoice(X) which is being partial cleared. Can you please suggest me a logic?
Ramana.GottipatiChange the base line date of partial payment document to 01.09.2011 after receiving payment.
Standard SAP will not automatically change the base line date of partial payment document to a back date and you develop with above logic
Or you need to change manually
Srinivas -
Dear All,
I am very wondering why the result in the AR/AP Aging report is not as same as G/L account balance ? Pls give advice. TIA
Rgd,
JohnThis is the query of the fourth :
RCT----
select T0.ObjType PaymType,T2.DocNum PaymNum
,T0.CardCode
,T0.DocDate PaymRefDate,T0.DocDueDate PaymDueDate
,T0.DocCurr PaymCurr,T0.DocTotal PaymTotal,T0.DocTotalFC PaymtotalFC
,T1.IntrnMatch PaymIntM
,T3.IntrnMatch InvIntM
,T4.BaseRef InvNum,T4.TransType InvType
,InvRefDate =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 13 THEN T5.DocDate
WHEN 14 THEN T6.DocDate
ELSE T4.RefDate
END
,InvDueDate =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 13 THEN T5.DocDueDate
WHEN 14 THEN T6.DocDueDate
ELSE T4.DueDate
END
,InvTotal =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 13 THEN T5.DocTotal
WHEN 14 THEN T6.DocTotal
ELSE T4.LocTotal
END
,InvTotalFC =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 13 THEN T5.DocTotalFC
WHEN 14 THEN T6.DocTotalFC
ELSE T4.FcTotal
END
,InvPaid =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 13 THEN T5.PaidToDate
WHEN 14 THEN T6.PaidToDate
ELSE T4.LocTotal
END
,InvPaidFC =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 13 THEN T5.PaidFC
WHEN 14 THEN T6.PaidFC
ELSE T4.FCTotal
END
,T2.SumApplied Applied,T2.AppliedFC AppliedFC
from RCT2 T2
inner join ORCT T0 on T0.DocEntry = T2.DocNum
inner join JDT1 T1 on T1.TransId = T0.TransId
and T1.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join JDT1 T3 on T3.TransType = T2.InvType
and T3.CreatedBy = T2.DocEntry
and T3.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join OJDT T4 on T4.TransId = T3.TransId
left outer join OINV T5 on T2.InvType = 13
and T5.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry
left outer join ORIN T6 on T2.InvType = 14
and T6.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry
where T0.Canceled = 'N'
and not (T1.IntrnMatch <> 0 and T1.IntrnMatch = T3.IntrnMatch)
and not (T1.IntrnMatch < 0 and T3.IntrnMatch < 0)
VPM----
UNION
select T0.ObjType PaymType,T2.DocNum PaymNum
,T0.CardCode
,T0.DocDate PaymRefDate,T0.DocDueDate PaymDueDate
,T0.DocCurr PaymCurr,T0.DocTotal PaymTotal,T0.DocTotalFC PaymtotalFC
,T1.IntrnMatch PaymIntM
,T3.IntrnMatch InvIntM
,T4.BaseRef InvNum,T4.TransType InvType
,InvRefDate =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 18 THEN T5.DocDate
WHEN 19 THEN T6.DocDate
ELSE T4.RefDate
END
,InvDueDate =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 18 THEN T5.DocDueDate
WHEN 19 THEN T6.DocDueDate
ELSE T4.DueDate
END
,InvTotal =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 18 THEN T5.DocTotal
WHEN 19 THEN T6.DocTotal
ELSE T4.LocTotal
END
,InvTotalFC =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 18 THEN T5.DocTotalFC
WHEN 19 THEN T6.DocTotalFC
ELSE T4.FcTotal
END
,InvPaid =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 18 THEN T5.PaidToDate
WHEN 19 THEN T6.PaidToDate
ELSE T4.LocTotal
END
,InvPaidFC =
CASE T2.InvType
WHEN 18 THEN T5.PaidFC
WHEN 19 THEN T6.PaidFC
ELSE T4.FCTotal
END
,T2.SumApplied Applied,T2.AppliedFC AppliedFC
from VPM2 T2
inner join OVPM T0 on T0.DocEntry = T2.DocNum
inner join JDT1 T1 on T1.TransId = T0.TransId
and T1.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join JDT1 T3 on T3.TransType = T2.InvType
and T3.CreatedBy = T2.DocEntry
and T3.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join OJDT T4 on T4.TransId = T3.TransId
left outer join OPCH T5 on T2.InvType = 18
and T5.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry
left outer join ORPC T6 on T2.InvType = 19
and T6.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry
where T0.Canceled = 'N'
and not (T1.IntrnMatch <> 0 and T1.IntrnMatch = T3.IntrnMatch)
and not (T1.IntrnMatch < 0 and T3.IntrnMatch < 0)
RIN----
UNION
select T0.ObjType PaymType,T0.DocNum PaymNum
,T0.CardCode
,T0.DocDate PaymRefDate,T0.DocDueDate PaymDueDate
,T0.DocCur PaymCurr,T0.DocTotal PaymTotal,T0.DocTotalFC PaymtotalFC
,T1.IntrnMatch PaymIntM
,T3.IntrnMatch InvIntM
,T4.BaseRef InvNum,T4.TransType InvType
,InvRefDate = T5.DocDate
,InvDueDate = T5.DocDueDate
,InvTotal = T5.DocTotal
,InvTotalFC = T5.DocTotalFC
,InvPaid = T5.PaidToDate
,InvPaidFC = T5.PaidFC
,T0.DocTotal Applied,T0.DocTotalFC AppliedFC
from RIN1 T2
inner join ORIN T0 on T0.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry
inner join JDT1 T1 on T1.TransId = T0.TransId
and T1.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join JDT1 T3 on T3.TransType = T2.BaseType
and T3.CreatedBy = T2.BaseEntry
and T3.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join OJDT T4 on T4.TransId = T3.TransId
inner join OINV T5 on T5.DocEntry = T2.BaseEntry
where T2.BaseType = 13
and not (T1.IntrnMatch <> 0 and T1.IntrnMatch = T3.IntrnMatch)
and not (T1.IntrnMatch < 0 and T3.IntrnMatch < 0)
RPC----
UNION
select T0.ObjType PaymType,T0.DocNum PaymNum
,T0.CardCode
,T0.DocDate PaymRefDate,T0.DocDueDate PaymDueDate
,T0.DocCur PaymCurr,T0.DocTotal PaymTotal,T0.DocTotalFC PaymtotalFC
,T1.IntrnMatch PaymIntM
,T3.IntrnMatch InvIntM
,T4.BaseRef InvNum,T4.TransType InvType
,InvRefDate = T5.DocDate
,InvDueDate = T5.DocDueDate
,InvTotal = T5.DocTotal
,InvTotalFC = T5.DocTotalFC
,InvPaid = T5.PaidToDate
,InvPaidFC = T5.PaidFC
,T0.DocTotal Applied,T0.DocTotalFC AppliedFC
from RPC1 T2
inner join ORPC T0 on T0.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry
inner join JDT1 T1 on T1.TransId = T0.TransId
and T1.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join JDT1 T3 on T3.TransType = T2.BaseType
and T3.CreatedBy = T2.BaseEntry
and T3.ShortName = T0.CardCode
inner join OJDT T4 on T4.TransId = T3.TransId
inner join OPCH T5 on T5.DocEntry = T2.BaseEntry
where T2.BaseType = 18
and not (T1.IntrnMatch <> 0 and T1.IntrnMatch = T3.IntrnMatch)
and not (T1.IntrnMatch < 0 and T3.IntrnMatch < 0)
The query is not certainly correcting the inconsistent reconciliation, but you must peform manually. I will return to give you better solution. The important things are it will display the incorrect recconciliation.
Rgds, -
Ageing(Customer and Vendor) report problem
Dear Experts,
Firstly, Glad to be before you.
Here, we have developed ageing report for Customers and Vendors. In which the Partial payment line item (let us say A) against an Invoice (lets say X) is not being shown under the same age of Invoice Line Item.
For example:
Scenario 1)
Let me say that the Payment Terms 'Z001' under which the line Items fall due only after 30 days.
I have posted an invoice on 01.09.2011 with Rs. 20000
If we run the Ageing as on 16.12.2011, the output is projected as follows:
============================================Days in Arrears
0-20--20-4040-60--
60-80
Line Item X (Invoice)----
20000
Total Balance agewise:--000--
20000
Here for Invoice NO PROBLEM is being raised, as the Invoice Posting Date is taken as the Baseline Date from which the Ageing will be calculated based on Payment terms assigned to Customer in the master data.
But the Problem is when we do partial payment:
Scenario 2)
Let me Take the same example:
Let me say that the Payment Terms 'Z001' under which the line Items fall due only after 30 days.
I have posted an invoice on 01.09.2011 with Rs. 20000 (Due by 77 days as on 16.12.2011)
We have received payment of 8000 against the invoice, on 22.09.2011 (due by 55 days as on 16.12.2011)
now the Ageing report is ran on same 16.12.2011, for which the output is as follows:
============================================Days in Arrears
0-20--20-4040-60--
60-80
Line Item X (Invoice) -
20000
Line Item Y (Partial Payment)----
(8000)
Total Balance agewise:--00(8000)--
20000
As per Technical logic whats happening is correct. Because the Base Line date of the partial payment line Item is being picked from the posting date of the same. BUT NOW, THE REQUIREMENT IS AS FOLLOW:
The wants to see the related Partial payment items also in the same AGE in the report. i.e., we should make the system pick the Baseline date of the partial payment line item(Y) from the posting date(01.09.2011) of the other line item(X) i.e., from the Invoice(X) which is being partial cleared. Can you please suggest me a logic?
Ramana.GottipatiHai Srinivas
Thank you so much for your kind reply.
We first suggested the client to enter baseline date manually, for which they requested to find some automation. Could you please kindly suggest some logic for changing the Baseline date of partial payment line item to the baseline date of its respective invoice item.
Ramana.Gottipati -
Problem in Logic for Customer Ageing Report
Hi,
I am developing a Customer Ageing Report in which i am facing a problem i.e. i am taking tables BSID,BSAD in which i ham taking the open items first and then i am using for all entries in it on the open items and i had debugged it and data picking is correct .
But the MAJOR problem comes when the data is stored in the respective coloumns i.e. 0-30 ,31-60-61-90 etc.. Currently i am comparing the code with the Standard Report i.e.S_ALR_87012126 it is not coming accurate...
Is there any way to solve this problem ....
Edited by: nav009 on Jan 8, 2010 11:39 AMHi,
First you need to calculate the Due date of the Transaction with the help of FM 'NET_DUE_DATE_GET'.
Once you get the Due date calculate the value wf_nod as wf_nod = p_budat - wf_due_date where p_budat is the date on which you want to run the ageing report and wf_due_date is due date of the transaction.
once you get this wf_nod write the following logic :
IF wf_nod < 0.
wa_tab-ndue = wa_data-dmbtr.
ELSE.
IF wf_nod <= pnod1.
wa_tab-amt1 = wa_data-dmbtr.
ELSE.
IF wf_nod > pnod1 AND wf_nod <= pnod2.
wa_tab-amt2 = wa_data-dmbtr.
ELSE.
IF wf_nod > pnod2 AND wf_nod <= pnod3.
wa_tab-amt3 = wa_data-dmbtr.
ELSE.
IF wf_nod > pnod3 AND wf_nod <= pnod4.
wa_tab-amt4 = wa_data-dmbtr.
ELSE.
IF wf_nod > pnod4 AND wf_nod <= pnod5.
wa_tab-amt5 = wa_data-dmbtr.
ELSE.
IF wf_nod > pnod5.
wa_tab-amt6 = wa_data-dmbtr.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Collect wa_tab into it_tab.
where pnod1.......pnod5 are the aging period as 30,60,90,180,365 etc.
by this you will get correct results.
Please get back to me if you need some more help on this.
Regards,
Nikhil -
Currency problem in accounts receivables ageing report
when i generated accounts receivables ageing report i got ageing in UAE DIRHAMS only and i have receivables in two different currencies in UAE DIRHAMS AND IN EURO , i want to get all receivables in the ageing report in euro only but i couldn't please how to solve this currency problem
thanks in advanceHi
Please refer this transaction code for account receivable ageing report
S_ALR_87012168 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items
Regards
Praveen -
hi I am developing a aging report for which I am getting fields from the tables EKPO and EKKO based on
s_gjahr FOR bsid-gjahr OBLIGATORY. "Document Fiscal year
p_date TYPE vbak-aedat OBLIGATORY, "A/P Open items
p_bukrs TYPE t001-bukrs OBLIGATORY. "Company
s_ekorg FOR mepo1222-ekorg OBLIGATORY, "Purchasing Organization
s_ekgrp FOR mepo1222-ekgrp, "Purchasing group
s_zterm FOR bseg-zterm, "Terms
s_ebeln FOR bseg-ebeln, "Purchase order
s_hkont FOR bseg-hkont, "Reconciliation Account.
s_blart FOR invfo-blart OBLIGATORY, "Document type
s_date FOR bseg-zfbdt NO-DISPLAY.
SELECT * FROM ekko INTO TABLE tbl_ekko WHERE bukrs = p_bukrs
AND zterm IN s_zterm
AND ekorg IN s_ekorg
AND ekgrp IN s_ekgrp.
IF tbl_ekko[] IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT * FROM ekpo INTO TABLE tbl_ekpo FOR ALL ENTRIES IN tbl_ekko
WHERE ebeln = tbl_ekko-ebeln
AND bukrs = p_bukrs
AND repos = 'X'
AND werks IN s_werks. "additonal.
ENDIF.
Now my problem is I need to combine the data I have selected from EKKO with a table which has EBELN, I found BSIK but that doesnt have the EBELN field filled.
Can you tell me some table other than BSEG ( performace issue ) which I can use to select my entries with Inner join... only BSIK has BLART not BSEG..
I will definitely award points for all the helpful answersHi
U need to read the EKBE table here you should fine the FI invoices linked to PO
Max -
Vendor Liabilities Aging Report
Hi Guys,
We are trying to generate a Vendor Liabilities Aging report on one of our companies, but no data is being displayed. Instead the following error message is being shown "Data is not available; modify the select criteria and re-enter [Message 131-85]". We also tried various options in the selection criteria but still this did not solve our problem.
We are suspecting that this could be related with data corruption since during this weekend we had power failures on MSSQL and SAP servers.
Any help from you guys will be much appreciated...
Many Thanks,
BernardHi Bernard,
Welcome you post on the forum.
It is more than likely the data consistency issue. You must got certain bad data in your database. Run DBCC first to see if the problem can be fixed. If not, report to SAP support to get help.
Thanks,
Gordon -
Aging report of vendor and ekorg related amount
Hi,
My requirement is for vendor 122 within certain period for certain ekorg-c100
and D100 show different amount.
is it possible for vendor aging report.
I developed a vendor aging report for displaying comp-code, vendor, Pur-org,
Total-amount, month wise amount picking from bsik-dmbtr.
I added a field EKORG ( Pur Org ) from lfm1 table with D100 and C100.
And total amount for vendor 122 for a period from 01.01.2009 to 09.09.2009 is 5000/- Rs.
when a new P.O. is crated using Ekorg C100 of amount 2000/-.
My problem is :
After execution of report for same vendor 122 with ekorg c100.
Then it shouid show 7000/- Rs.
And After execution of report for same vendor 122 with ekorg D100.
Then it shouid show 5000/- Rs.
My report is showing same amount in both d100 and c100.
My report is showing same amount 7000/- in D100 and C100 for vendor 122.
Amount picking Bsik table has not ekorg field.
Please let me know how can i do that ?
Moderator message - If you get no responses to a post, bump it to the top by replying or editing it. Do not make duplicate posts. Other posts locked.
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Sep 11, 2009 9:31 AMHi Amy .
is the the system currency same as the local currency.?
I think it would be in system currency .
Rgsd,
Premraj -
Purchase organizartion field in vendor aging report
Report is vendor liability aging : lifnr from lfa1, ( bukrs from lfb1 and posting date from bsik both fields are maindatory ).
I have to add one field EKORG . I am using LFM1 table.
i am picking lifnr ekorg from LFM1 table & then picking for all entries on bsik with lifnr equality in lfm1.
& then selecting lfa1-lifnr from i_bsik-lifnr equality.
is lfm1 write table to add field ekorg in vendor liability aging report ?
Problem is : earlier report without LFM1-EKORG was showing more vendors ,amount , g-total.
but with lfm1-ekorg field ( vendors are less, effecting total, amount)
Any solution ?
Thanks.>
Ravi Kumar wrote:
> Report is vendor liability aging : lifnr from lfa1, ( bukrs from lfb1 and posting date from bsik both fields are maindatory ).
> I have to add one field EKORG . I am using LFM1 table.
> i am picking lifnr ekorg from LFM1 table & then picking for all entries on bsik with lifnr equality in lfm1.
> & then selecting lfa1-lifnr from i_bsik-lifnr equality.
> is lfm1 write table to add field ekorg in vendor liability aging report ?
> Problem is : earlier report without LFM1-EKORG was showing more vendors ,amount , g-total.
> but with lfm1-ekorg field ( vendors are less, effecting total, amount)
>
> Any solution ?
> Thanks.
the relation from vendor to ekorg is 1:n (LFM1, the same vendor can be defined for various purchasing organisations.
the relation from company code to ekorg can be n:m (depending on the configuration)
explanation: depending on your configuration, ekorg can be bound to one and only one company code (bsik) -> the business process for this would be: one purchasing organisation (ekorg) purchases for one company code only. on the other hand, the binding to a company code is not mandatory, the business process being: one purchasing organisation (ekorg) does the work centrally for all child company codes. last not least: you can leave all of your purchasing organisations 'unbound', so that all of them are able to purchase for all company codes ...
with this in mind, check your selections again. -
Hello,
i experienced the phenomenon that in the aging reports the ref number is not always there. although in the invoice documents the field is filled out.
when i look at the report in the designer i just see that this field has its data from a variable.
can anybody help me? did anyone has the same problem?
best regards, philippHave you tried to print preview the report ?
In my PL30 version, even if the A/P invoice has been closed, I can update the vendor ref no.
SO, I suggest you to cut the vendor ref no.in the invoice no. where its vendor ref no. is not available in the aging report, then update it. After that, you paste it and update it.
Let us know if the vendor ref no. is available or not.
if not, submit a ticket to SAP support or upgrade to PL37
Rgds -
Vendor ref. no. not appearing in print preview of vendor aging report
Dear all,
Vendor reference number is not appearing in print preview of vendor ageing report,we have
customized template AGE3 collection report,we have taken print outs before a month,vendor
reference number get printed in report,now it is not appearing
What could be problem ?
Any one faces this issue ?
We are using SAP Business One 2005 B (7.40.252) SP: 00 PL: 41.
Latest patch upgrade to PL:46 will solve the issue ?
Jeyakanthanhi all,
Thru a workaround i brought up vendor reference number in print preview/print,
Applied formatted search in journal remarks of ap invoice thru query
SELECT $[OPCH.NumAtCard]
,this will populate vendor ref. no in journal remarks
which can be displayed in details in aging report.
Is there any solution other than above to bring vendor reference number in print ?
Jeyakanthan -
After made partly payment to an invoice of vendor, and proecessed it in the outgoing payment, why the ageing report does not reflect the balance of the that particular invoice, instead of showing the original amount and the payment, which makes the ageing report very long and confused. How can I solve this problem? thanks.
There is no problem with AP balance. After payment made, it is reduced. The only one that remain unchanged is doc status. it is still open since the payment is partial. I suggest to cancel the payment and then repaying again. If problem still persists it will be bugs in the PL you are currently using.
Rgds, -
I mean is there anyway to user decode for showing sum(amount) for different period of dates
is there any idea to make faster ageing report for accounts payable module.
Thanks AHON
Edited by: [email protected] on Nov 22, 2009 7:09 AMplz write more clear requirements...... ur table structures and report output ....
i have few aging reports and all working without any problem.....it depends on ur table structure also. -
Aging Report for consolidating Business Partners
I have a customer that is using consolidation functionality for its vendors. The BP parent it is set as multicurrency, the childrenu2019s for this parent are set with a different currency (USD, CAD, RMB etc). My question is how I can obtain a proper aging report for this consolidated BP (by BP children currency) as for now all the transactions are automatically converted in local currency even when Iu2019m selecting the BP currency to display.
Thank you,
Alex CorbuHi Alex
The best would be a query on JDT1 table linked to OINV for example. The problem as you mentioned is that although the document is against the sub account, it is automatically posted against the head account for balance and payment purposes. In the journal file it only keeps the Head account and not the sub accounts. In OINV (and other marketing documents) you can use the FatherCard field to identify the Head account and the CardCode the sub account. These will of course be linked by the Document number from OINV and the Ref1 from JDT1.
The above is assuming you need the information exactly the same as the ageing, as the ageing is by default pulled from the Journal tables. You could simplify this by using just the OINV table. Remember that the balance is made up of Invoices less Credit Notes, so in this instance it would be OINV minus ORIN entries.
Hope the above all makes sense, if not just ask.
Kind regards
Peter Juby
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to open a idml file created by CS6 in CS5?
I created a file in InDesign CS6 and saved as idml file yesterday. But today I can not open either in CS6 or CS5 version. It says "Cannot open the file "Project #3.idml". Adobe InDesign may not support the file format, a plug-in that supports the fil
-
I am not able to activate my subscription of adobe photoshop cs 5.1
while installation, adobe accepts my key but when i have to enter my adobe id, it says "we cannot activate your subscription for adobe photoshop cs 5.1" ans says try again. i have tried again and again but i am unable to do so.
-
I have an iMac, iMac, 10,1 10.8. I would like to have iCloud downloaded to my computer. Does my computer have the system requirement necessary. I use iCal on my Apple Notebook and Iphone 4S and want it to my Mac Desktop to sinc with all my Apple Pro
-
980 songs missing out of 5567 aft upgrade to 8.2.1.6
This is frustrating. songs are in the iTunes Music folder. Only way i see is to add all files all over again manually. Somgs missing are random over all albums. I noticed this when syncing my nano and it came up with a warning that many songs could n
-
Error_log in apache server keep on growing
I found the error_log in apache server keep on growing in every second! Anyone can tell me why it's growing like this? I have Oracle 9i Database on Windows XP Professional on Core 2 Duo/ 2 GB RAM machine. I have a peculiar problem. The error_log file