Aligning and Snapping to Anchored Objects

Is there a setting that will allow me to snap other objects to anchored object?
Currently, everytime I want to align or snap to an anchored object, I have to remove the anchor, align, then re-apply the anchor. Over, and over. Why don't the snaps recognize the anchored object?

Jongware,
You're wrong on a couple of counts:
1. The parent of the inline/anchored frame is the character that holds it.
2. The parentStory is (in effect) the same as myTF.texts[0].
I just used Fred's code and did this with it, having created a document with a text frame holding just the word "Hello" and it worked:
myDoc = app.documents[0];
setupFindText("Hello");
myFinds = myDoc.findText();
myTF = myFinds[0].insertionPoints[-1].textFrames.add();
myAnchStory = myTF.parentStory;
myAnchStory.texts[0].contents = "What?";
function setupFindText(find, change, wholeWd, caseSense, foots, hidLayers, lockedLayers, lockedStories, masters) {
  app.findTextPreferences = null;
  app.changeTextPreferences = null;
  try { app.findTextPreferences.findWhat = find } catch(e) {};
  try {app.changeTextPreferences.changeTo = change } catch(e) {};
  app.findChangeTextOptions.properties = {
    caseSensitive:(caseSense == null ? false : caseSense),
    wholeWord:(wholeWd == null ? false : wholeWd),
    includeFootnotes:(foots == null ? false : foots),
    includeHiddenLayers:(hidLayers == null ? false : hidLayers),
    includeLockedLayersForFind:(lockedLayers == null ? false : lockedLayers),
    includeLockedStoriesForFind:(lockedStories == null ? false : lockedStories),
    includeMasterPages:(masters == null ? false : masters)
} // end setupFindText
Dave

Similar Messages

  • Anchor Objects that go haywire

    Hi - we are a small studio that use InDesign CS3 on mainly Intel Mac's and two iMacs (not Intel). Most of our books are educational so they often use icons. To speed up corrections further down the line (when text might be inserted or deleted) we set these up as anchored objects and have even gone so far as to make object styles for the anchored objects offsets. Most of the time this works really well.
    The problem we are experiencing now is that while doing corrections to a particularly text heavy academic book (A4, 2 columns) the icons have started to jump all over the place.
    As far as I can make out it all started happening when a large heading jumped into the next text frame. The anchored objects all moved down as they should. But when the heading was corrected and brought back into it's box, the anchored icons did not go back to be alongside the text they were with before.
    It's almost like the zero point has moved or something. Does anyone know of a global way to fix this? Otherwise we have to go and select each anchored object and clear the overrides. (Did I mention it has a lot of icons!)
    Sorry for the long explanation, I hope you can make sense of this and have a quick answer)
    Eloise

    Daniel,
    You can always use a copy of the T shirt outline as a Clipping Path for an Object>Clipping Mask.
    Otherwise, it depends on the actual artwork; in some cases you may use one of the Pathfinders.
    If you have CS5, you should also be able to use Draw Inside.
    Edit: Hi Monika.

  • Align Stroke To and Snap To are incompatible.

    This has always bothered me. I am wondering if anyone can defend ID's current stroking behaviour. If not it should be fixed.
    Changing the stroke alignment on an object changes the dimensions of the object. Does this ever make sense?
    If anyone begins to answer in the affirmative, then they should immediately go to jail, do not pass go. There they should be forced to ponder the quirky behaviour of snap to as it relates to stroke.
    Regardless of which stroke alignment is used, a frame will always snap with the stroke to the inside. This means that if a centred alignment is snapped to guides, changing to align stroke to inside will result in a box half a stroke away from the guide, changing to align stroke to outside will result in a stroke centred on the guide. But repositioning any of these to snap to your guides again, will result in the stroke being inside.
    The only stroke alignment that changes to what it should in relation to a guide is align stroke to inside. But the user still loses the ability to snap to a guide if the stroke alignment is changed.
    This shouldn't have needed this lengthy explanation. This is how snap to guide should work:
    Stroke aligned to inside: outside edge of stroke snaps to guide.
    Stroke aligned to centre: centre of stroke snaps to guide.
    Stroke aligned to outside: inside edge of stroke snaps to guide.
    Does anything else make sense?

    > But that wasn't exactly what I asked.
    It still describes the behaviour; by extrapolation your example would also yeild a single stroke. If you wanted both strokes to show, resulting in a double thickness, both would have to have the same alignment, i.e. both inside, or both outside. This is simple and intuitive: opposing alignments cancel, same alignments multiply.
    > Now I think you are misunderstanding me. What you describe is the current behavior.
    I don't think I misunderstood. That's why I answered, No. The behaviour of the content is fine and as it should be. The content should always be defined by the path. Any behaviour change such as you were hinting at (Do you shrink the content when you force the frame to shrink by moving the stroke from inside to outside?) would be horrendous. For the behaviour modifications I propose, we can safely ignore considerations of the frame's content. But I will say this in clarification. Traditionally printing has always preferred a situation where the border of a quad slightly overprints the content; a centred stroke both protected against content printing outside the border and against a white line forming inside of the border. The idea that the content scale to accommodate a stroked border that a quad should be reduced something like 99.873% just so that the outside two or three rows of screen dot would NOT be overprinted will never make sense to me on any level.
    > You don't have to select any points.
    "(selecting the appropriate anchor points and contraining their movement)" Perhaps I should have said "and/or." But really, I not inclinded to entertain arguments that amount to "the more awkward, unintuitive, and difficult way that you say you shouldn't have to use isn't as bad as you think." Yes it is. Moving objects around in your layout and snapping them to guides should be done by the selection tool. The direct selection tool is micro management and intended for manipulating content in relation to the object.
    >I'm sure that well over 90% of the time I'm more interested in snapping the "visible" outer edge of an object
    That simply doesn't make sense to me. First, and I repeat, the most simple-minded interpretation of align stroke to outside means the stroke is put outside. What advantage is there to having three different choices if all three have the same result when snapped to a margin? You may as well stick with Quark's simple one choice: the border is always inside the item. Having different behaviours for the different doesn't restrict you. Use align border to inside 90% of the time.
    >And I get the sense that you don't like to use the coordinate fields for positioning
    Not necessarily true, just not relevant to the topic. I am talking about the behaviour of snap to as it is affected by the stroke alignment. There is no need to confuse the issue. If I have guides in place, and an object selected, there is no simpler way to position that object than by using snap. Or at least there shouldn't be.

  • Anchored objects and first line in InDesign CS3

    Hi, thanks for reading. I know that when you want an achored object at the beginning of a text block to all push away ("wrap around") the text, including the first line, you have to put it into a line before that.
    What I don't like about it, is that I then have an empty first line and everything else is pushed one line down. Now I could move the whole textbox up, to fit to the rest of my layout, but that's not the way one should work in InDesign. Is there a way to get around the first line?

    T-
    Select the anchored object and put text wrap on it. Then select the anchored object and go to Object/Anchored Object/Options. Select Position: Inline and set the Y Offset to the negative number that aligns your text where you want it.

  • Get textFrame by label returns null and anchored objects

    I have the following two functions:
    function getByLabel(page, label)
        for(var i=0; i < page.allPageItems.length; i++)
            if( page.allPageItems[i].label == label )
                return page.allPageItems[i];
    and
    Object.prototype.findItems = function(/*obj*/props)
        if( !('everyItem' in this) )
            throw new Error("Error: " + this + " is not a collection.");
        var ret = this.everyItem().getElements(),
            i = ret.length,
            e, p;
        while( i-- && e=ret[i] )
            for( p in props )
                if( (p in e) && e[p]===props[p] ) continue;
                ret.splice(i,1);
        return ret;
    In my page structure, I got one main text frame (the content area) and two vertical text fromes on the sides of the page. There is also a small box textframe on top of the page. All these textboxes EXCEPT the main text frame are ALL "ANCHORED objects". I had to make them anchored objects, eitherwise after importing data, the boxes would jump around. (Example, the small box textframe that is on the top would get moved to the content area textframe etc). Not sure if using anchored objects is the proper way to fix this.
    When I try to get the small box text frame, it does not work using the findItems (returns null) but it works fine with the getByLabel method. Why is that?
    The calling syntax is:
    for( i=0 ; i < doc.pages.length ; ++i )
            var page = doc.pages.item(i);
            var textFrame = getByLabel(page, 'lblSection' ); //This works
            //   var textFrame = page.textFrames.findItems({ label:  'lblSection' })[0]; This does not work, returns null
            if( textFrame != null )
                textFrame.parentStory.contents = "";

    (function () {
        // Per the InDesign Scripting Guide, app.activeScript is only
        // valid when a script is directly executed from InDesign, not
        // from the ESTK, so a try/catch block is recommended to handle
        // it.
        var d;
        try {
            d = app.activeScript.parent.parent.fsName;
        } catch (e) {
            d = Folder.appPackage.parent.fsName+"/Scripts";
            return d;

  • Callouts and anchored objects - there must be a better way to do this

    I've spent a lot of time in the last six months rebuilding PDF files in InDesign. It's part of my ordinary responsibilities, but I'm doing a lot more of it for some reason. Because I'm sending the text of these rebuild documents out for translation, I like to keep all of the text in a single story. It really helps to have the text in "logical order," I think; when I'm prepping a trifold brochure, I try pretty hard to make sure that the order in which the readers will read the text is duplicated in the flow of the story throughout the ID document.
    So, I'm rebuilding a manual that has a 3-column format on lettersize paper, and it's full of callouts. Chock full of 'em. They're not pull quotes, either; each of these things has unique text. Keeping in mind that I'd like the text in these callouts to remain in the same position in the text once I've linked all the stories and exported an RTF for translation, what's the best way to handle them? What I've been doing is inserting an emptly stroked frame as an anchored object, sized and positioned to sit above the text that is supposed to be called out. When my translations come back, they're always longer than the source document, so as I crawl through the text, I resize the anchored frames to match the size and position of the newly expanded translated text, and then nudge them into place with the keyboard.
    There Has To Be a Better Way.
    There is a better way, right? I'm not actually too sure. If I want to actually fill those anchored frames with text, I can't thread them into the story. I suppose that I could just thread the callout frames and assign two RTFs for translation instead of one, but then the "logical order" of my text is thrown out the window. So, I'm down to asking myself "what's more important? reduction of formatting time or maintenance of the flow of the story?" If there's something I'm missing that would let me dodge this decision, I'd love to hear about it. The only thing I can think of would work like this:
    1) Duplicate callout text in the story with a custom swatch "Invisible"
    2) Create "CalloutText" parastyle with "Invisible" swatch and apply it to callout text
    3) Insert anchor for anchored frame immediately before the CalloutText content
    4) Send it out for translation
    5) While I'm waiting for it to come back, write a script that would (dunno if this is possible):
       a) Step through the main story looking for any instance of CalloutText
       b) Copy one continguous instance of that style to the clipboard
       c) Look back in the story for the first anchor preceeding the instance of CalloutText
       d) Fill the anchored object with the text from the clipboard (this is where I'm really clueless)
       e) Apply a new parastyle to the text in the callout
       f) Continue stepping through the story looking for further instances of CalloutText
    If this really is the only decent solution, I'll just head over to the Scripting forum for some help with d). Can any of you make other suggestions?

    In-Tools.com wrote:
    The use of Side Heads saves weeks of manual labor.
    Yup, Harbs, that is exactly what I was describing. If I use the Side Heads plugin to set up a job, will my clients get a missing plug-in warning when they open up the INDD? Will roundtripping through INX strip the plugin but leave the text in the callout? (My clients don't care if the logical flow of the story is broken; it's just me.)
    I'm just curious; seems like a pretty obvious purchase to me. I'll probably try to script a solution anyways, after I buy the plugin; that way I get to learn about handling anchored objects in scripts AND deliver the job on time!

  • TextWrap and Anchored Objects

    Okay, I've been using InDesign since it was PageMaker 4.3 so I'm pretty familiar with the features and the intents behind them. Lately I've had a problem for which I can't seem to find a fully acceptable work-around. It involves text-wrapping anchored objects within a large, multi page flow of text.
    Boiled down to a basic description of the issue, I need a graphic to appear on a page within a text block at a certain point, that is, at the top of a justified paragraph on the extreme right side of the column. The object occupies 7 lines of text, dropping down into the paragraph from line 1. The object needs to have a word wrap applied causing the text within the block to flow around it.
    The problem is that as the document evolves, the quantity of text that precedes the paragraph holding the graphic changes. As text is added to preceding paragraphs, text advances through the text blocks to a point where the graphic now begins to be displayed beyond the bottom of the text block rather than jump to the next text block. Forcing the object to stay within the text block (by using the "Keep with top/bottom column boundaries") pushes the object up, effectively leaving the original location and invading the preceding paragraph.
    The first solution I tried was to anchor the object 7 lines deep in the paragraph, then manually move it up to the first line using the "Y-offset" in the "Anchored Objects Options" palette. When I do this, the object's text wrap fails (!), always working only at line 7 and below and not moving up with the object.
    My current solution is to not embed the object inline at all, but place it over the text block. This works but is unsatisfactory since the text is constantly changing, forcing me to stop and reposition the graphic - plus the 500 or so similar objects that follow in similar situations further along in the document.
    Any ideas?

    Unfortunately, no. If the anchor is inserted at the top of the paragraph (where I want the top of the image to be), the image won't flow to the next text block when any other part of the image (i.e., any part of the image that is not on the first line where the anchor is) is beyond the end of its text block.
    Here is how I want the page to look:
    Here, the graphic is not placed inline but sits over the text with textwrap set.
    But rather than have all my objects placed over text, I want them inline. If I place the anchor anywhere below the first line of text, (again, the line where I want the top of the image to be), text wrap won't function above the anchor point regardless of how high I move the image:
    If I place the graphic in its own paragraph above the first line of the paragraph, the result works well as long as the text preceding the anchor doesn't flow any further (i.e., no additional text is added). But as text is added and once the line holding the bottom of the photo flows to a new text block, one of two problems arises. If "Keep Within Top/Bottom Column Boundaries" is checked the graphic moves up:
    If "Keep Within Top/Bottom Column Boundaries" is unchecked, the graphic begins to bleed out of the text box:
    I can't believe there isn't a simple (or even complex) solution to this problem...

  • Foot notes and Anchored Objects...

    So from what I can tell, an anchored object set to the bottom of the page, column, margin etc will all sit nice and smugly over footnotes!
    ( I would have thought using the column for the y axis would not count the footnote portion)
    Anyhow, has anyone come up with a solution for this?

    Unfortunately, no. If the anchor is inserted at the top of the paragraph (where I want the top of the image to be), the image won't flow to the next text block when any other part of the image (i.e., any part of the image that is not on the first line where the anchor is) is beyond the end of its text block.
    Here is how I want the page to look:
    Here, the graphic is not placed inline but sits over the text with textwrap set.
    But rather than have all my objects placed over text, I want them inline. If I place the anchor anywhere below the first line of text, (again, the line where I want the top of the image to be), text wrap won't function above the anchor point regardless of how high I move the image:
    If I place the graphic in its own paragraph above the first line of the paragraph, the result works well as long as the text preceding the anchor doesn't flow any further (i.e., no additional text is added). But as text is added and once the line holding the bottom of the photo flows to a new text block, one of two problems arises. If "Keep Within Top/Bottom Column Boundaries" is checked the graphic moves up:
    If "Keep Within Top/Bottom Column Boundaries" is unchecked, the graphic begins to bleed out of the text box:
    I can't believe there isn't a simple (or even complex) solution to this problem...

  • TOC and anchored objects

    Hi!
    I'm experiencing some problems generating the TOC.
    I design the chapter titles to stay into an anchored object before the first paragraph title but generating the TOC the chapter title is putted after the first paragraph title!
    There's a way to make indd to read the title into the anchored object first?
    Thank you!

    Thanks to everyone for the help and sorry if I can answer just now.
    I'm probably doing something wrong in anchoring the object, I don't use this method often. I need to put the chapter title in a frame that everything is within a fluid text, so that if I remove or add some text the title box moves accordingly.
    The method I used to anchor the text frame with the title chapter is to hold down the shift key and drag (I'm using windows7) on the black square. And it works great, if not for this issue of the TOC!
    I accept any kind of suggestion!
    @ Uwe: using this method to anchor I can't move the frame to right or left... So nothing change...

  • 3D tracking and snapping object to null?

    Okay so my teacher wanted us to use 3d tracking and then put in objects to texts in the video footage. I did the 3D analyzing and then put down my target on the screen. He then said that after the null was used for the tracking marker that I can put an image in it and snap that image to the null by pressing command. I'm on a PC at home. I'm sorry but I despise Mac. Since I don't have a command button and we use CC in school but at home I have CS6 I donno how to snap the picture to the null in CS6. Please help I'm freaking out.

    Alt and Option are the matching keys on a PC and a Mac
    Ctrl and cmmd are the other matching keys
    You can use two techniques for placing a new 3D layer in the same position as a null. Copy the position property of the null and paste to the new layer, or hold down the Cmnd/Ctrl + Shift key and make the null  the parent of the new layer. You can then remove the parent or leave it. If you do not see the parenting column in the timeline right click at the top and go to Columns>Parent.

  • Aligning and Distributing objects in InDesign

    Hi,
    I am using InDesign CS4. But I am having a trouble aligning objects. I know that in illustrator it is possible to align objects to a main object. For example, lets say I have several same square shapes on my page. I can make any one of the squares as the main object for others to get aligned or distributed to.
    I wanted to do the same thing in InDesign but was never able to do that. I wonder if it is even possible to do that. InDesign doesn't seem to have that option. But it was such a handy tool.
    Can you help me with the trick?

    Thanks Peter Spier. I am sorry for the misleading information. You were right about the alignment and distribution tools. On my CS4, the Alignment option works with the locked object, but the Distribue Objects and Distribute with Set Space doesn't work with a locked object. I am trying to use the distribute with a set spacing around "the main object". In other words, it will make my work a lot easier if I first align an object at a certain point on the page and then use two other text frames on both sides of the object with an equal spacing (using the Distribute Spacing tool).
    I hope it makes a sence. Thanks.

  • ID CS6 drag and drop anchored object - unable to get blue square

    Hi,
    I am a long time and intensive user of CS.
    A week ago or so, the blue square for dragging an anchored object disappeared.
    I have to do it manually. Troublesome since I am in the process of producing a number of ebooks.
    Any ideas? Thanks (I tried restarting the preferences, to no avail)
    (I publish in the pdf section, I cannot see any epub section )

    Hi has anyone an idea on this   blue square question please? an adobe expert maybe? thanks a lot

  • IDCS6(MAC) 10.9.4 - a script that will make an anchored object and paste in clipboard contents

    I'm trying to create a script that will create an anchored object that will paste in clipboard contents.
    So far I have:
    var frameRef = app.selection[0];
        var parentObj = frameRef.insertionPoints.item(0);
        var anchorFrame = parentObj.rectangles.add();
    And this works fine, creating an inline object, that can further be defined (with anchor point settings etc).
    However, it is when I go to use app.paste() or app.pasteInto() that all hell breaks loose.
    The line of code I added was:
    anchorFrame.content = app.pasteInto();
    and the error I get is:
    What am I doing incorrectly?
    Colin

    @Colin – For the paste command you like to use, you have to:
    1. First select an object, in your case the added rectangle object
    2. Then use the pasteInto() method from the app object
    3. There is no content property for a rectangle object
    Watch out what is selected after you added the rectangle.
    What you have is a selection of the text frame when you start your code in line one.
    Adding a rectangle will not change that selection.
    The following code will do the job.
    However, if you use pasteInto() the pasted objects could be only partly visible inside the frame.
    Depends on the size and position of the added rectangle relative to the original copied page items.
    Make sure that you give the rectangle a proper size after or while you are adding it:
    var frameRef = app.selection[0];
    var parentObj = frameRef.insertionPoints.item(0);
    //Will add a rectangle sized 40 x 40 mm
    var anchorFrame = parentObj.rectangles.add({geometricBounds:[0,0,"40mm","40mm"]});
    app.select(null); //Optional
    app.select(anchorFrame);
    app.pasteInto();
    Uwe

  • Illustrator CC Free Transform and Snapping

    It seems that in CC the Free Transform tool does not snap to grid when resizing (for example) a rectangle. If I have "Snap to Grid" turned on, it only is taking effect with new objects getting drawn. Am I understanding this correctly? If I draw a rectangle, and want to reshape/resize it to fit the grid, how do I do this? It's a bit embarrassing asking this question, but CC seems to have changed some things from CS6.

    I may have found a solution.
    I called a buddy of mine to help tackle this with me.
    Turns out, I'm trained to use the Free Transform tool in order to resize objects (and this has always worked in the past, that's what I've always done...hit the "E" key and then resize the object).
    NOW, you're not supposed to use the Free Transform tool for precise snapping (which, I...I don't even have words for, because there's no reason to remove the actual option of wanting a precise move (resize) to be made...so dumb).
    In order to precisely resize objects (with Smart Guides on), you must first make sure you are showing your bounding box (an option I previously had hidden 95% of the time because I hated looking at it).  So View > Show Bounding Box.  Then, with your regular ol' Selection Tool (V), you select the object, then hover over the anchor point and it will allow you to resize with the Smart Guides (and it works as well as it USED to work).
    The stupid thing is this works exactly the same way as the Free Transform tool...so, I guess, the Free Transform tool is now relegated to performing transforms only when you want to ignore precision altogether (which for me...is never).  I'd like a refund for that portion of the software that I'm paying for...or something.  I don't get it.
    Anyway, overly long story short.  Turn on your bounding box, use your selection tool to resize (instead of hitting E and using the free transform tool) and your resizes/transforms will align to your grids, guides and in accordance with the smart guides.
    Finally...

  • Anchored Objects with text wrap, need vertical space

    Hi.  I'm a fairly new InDesign user and have just this past week learned about anchored objects, threading text frames, numbered lists, and some other fun options. So far InDesign has done most everything I need fairly elegantly. However, I have not been able solve one issue.
    In my book I have numerous pages that have this issue; I'll just describe one case. On this page there are 4 graphics running down the right side of the page. These are not anchored graphics. They do have text wrap defined on the left side and bottom. There is text that wraps lovely on the left.
    Each of these four graphics has a specific paragraph it needs to top align with. However, the text it aligns with may not take up as much vertical space as the graphic does. When I anchor each graphic with the paragraph it needs to align with, the four graphics overlap each other.
    At the moment, to make it look right, I have placed each graphic individually and added a blank paragraph above each paragraph of text that should align with a graphic and use the Space Above of each blank paragraph to have it align with the graphic.
    I'm not even sure what to search to try and solve this. I looked briefly into compound paths, but that didn't look like it would help.
    I hope this is clear and thank you for any assistance at all.
    Andrea

    No problem. Click your cursor somewhere in the paragraph that ought to be aligned with the next image down, then run this Javascript.
    It's not entirely accurate, as it uses the font size to do a minimal adjustment where it actually should use the font's cap height -- but you cannot get to that through scripting. This final adjustment is necessary because ID does know the baseline, and your first line ought to dip just below this to have the top of the first line aligned to the top of the image.
    //DESCRIPTION:Align paragraph with image.
    // Jongware, 15-Jul-2010
    if (app.selection.length == 1 && app.selection[0].hasOwnProperty ("baseline") && app.selection[0].paragraphs[0].index > 0)
         // find nearest image on the right
         ypos = app.selection[0].paragraphs[0].lines[0].baseline;
         pg = app.selection[0].parentTextFrames[0];
         while (1)
              if (pg instanceof Character)
                   pg = pg.parentTextFrames[0];
              if (pg instanceof Spread || pg instanceof Page)
                   break;
              if (pg instanceof Document || pg instanceof Application)
                   exit(0);
              pg = pg.parent;
         img = pg.allGraphics;
         dist = 999999;
         nearest = null;
         for (i=0; i<img.length; i++)
              if (img[i].geometricBounds[0] > ypos && Math.abs(img[i].geometricBounds[0] - ypos) < dist)
                   dist = Math.abs(img[i].geometricBounds[0] - ypos);
                   nearest = img[i];
         if (nearest == null)
              alert ("no image found nearby!");
         else
              prevm = app.activeDocument.viewPreferences.verticalMeasurementUnits;
              app.activeDocument.viewPreferences.verticalMeasurementUnits = MeasurementUnits.POINTS;
              top = nearest.geometricBounds[0];
              ypos = app.selection[0].paragraphs[0].lines[0].baseline;
              if (ypos < top)
                   app.selection[0].paragraphs[0].spaceBefore = top-app.selection[0].pointSize-app.selection[0].parentStory.paragraphs.previousItem(app.selection[0].paragraphs[0]).lines[-1].baseline;
              app.activeDocument.viewPreferences.verticalMeasurementUnits = prevm;
    This image shows three paragraphs aligned with their respective images (it won't work on the first paragraph, but that ought not to be necessary anyhoo).

Maybe you are looking for

  • Regular expressions and back references

    Just wanted to know if anyone else noticed that. In the javadoc of java.util.regex.Pattern in the "Back references" section it says that you need to use \n to match capturing group but it does not work. To match a capturing group one need to use a "$

  • Cant restore 80GB Ipod because I dont have the Internet???

    So my wife bought me an 80gb Ipod and shipped it out to me (Im in Iraq). I hooked it up to my computer and it immediately started to work and sync all my music and what not onto it. I believe at the time I was using Itunes version 7.3. Well then I ho

  • Other Wireless Systems in area???

    A while ago I got a new iMac G5 with Airport Express and iSight and the whole sha-bang. Love it. I noticed that sometimes the icon which evidently reflects the amount of connectivity power. If I click on this icon, there is always one which is checke

  • Protected Field in Purchase Requisition

    When a certain scenario occurs in a Purchase Requisition the G/L Account field is not changeable. I would like to make it changeable. Is this possible in SPRO Screen layout, or other way?  Thank-You

  • Please help..getting no where with my provider and Blackberry Phone Support

    Message: "Uncaught exception:java.lang. Noclassdeffouf error" This occured when downloading new twitter update. I cant get in to the Blackberry App world and Twitter is now disappeared from my phone. Thanks in advance for the help.