Alternate specyfication for item in process quality

Hello,
I want to use alternate in sample. Always base specification shows up but use alternate is disable. Can somebody give short steps to setup this.
Regards,
Luko

Hi,
I am sorry but your problem us still no clear.
From what you say for your requirements , it is entirely possible to have this setup in OPM Quality so I am not quire sure what your problem is.
You can have one Specification with many Specification Validity rules , some more
Did you read the documentation ?
Generally speaking, Local specifications are searched before global specifications at each level of the specification matching hierarchy.
If no specification is found, then the application searches for the closest match of a specification with no grade.
To match a specification with a specific sample, the Samples window uses the base hierarchy when you click Get Spec.
Specification matching logic is performed when associating a specification to a sample in OPM Quality Management
This is clearly defined in the Specification Matching Business Rules section in the Oracle® Process Manufacturing Quality Management User's Guide
Release 12
Part No. B31152-01.
Regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

  • In process Quality for Production orders

    Hi Guys,
    I am facing issues while doing an in process quality for production order.The usage is In process quality,
    can anyone help me to carry out a flow for this usage type.
    What are the necessary settings to be done and also explain the workflow for this inspection type.
    Thanks,
    Krishna

    Hi,
    For in process quality you have to activate "03" type quality in the QM view for the material.
    After creation of the order you have to generate inspection lot and based on the inspection lot you have to do result recording.
    After that you will do the GR followed by usage decision of the inspation lot.
    Hope this will help.Please elaborate the details for further clarification.
    regards,
    kaushik

  • How to map import process for items

    Dear All,
    can anyone guide me how to map import process for items for our customer
    what i understand is this process in B one
    Raise PO
    GRPO
    Landed Cost
    AP Invoice
    I want to know whether this is correct. Also in this process their are clearing agents who perform the formalities at customs office and then raise bill to client for the same

    Hi,
    The process looks correct.  For cost related to clearing agents who perform the formalities at customs office, use landed cost.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Alternate solution for Refurbishment Process without split valuation

    Hi Experts,
    We are implementing SAP PM module. We want any alternate method for Refurbishment process ( Internally processed inside the plant) without activating the split valuation . Is it possible ? If possible, please suggest the process .
    Thanks in Advance.
    VT

    No suggestion received, I am closing this.
    regards
    VT

  • In process quality inspection in operation of a process order

    Hi,
    PP-PI inprocess quality inspection at operation level
    I am creating a process order having two operation. the first is quality inspection (inprocess inspection) & last is related to consumption of some materials.
    The control key in operations are pi02,pi03(miles stone confirmation). i am using insp type 03 in material master 
    user needs  insp. happen first then consumption of material.
    my question is
    1.when operation first get triggered  quality lot generated i enter RR & do UD.but here i can not see the insp lot stock as subscreen. why? then how can i block defect qty in block stock?
    2.how can i consume material in the same quality operation? 
    With Regards,
    Kareena

    Hi Kareena,
    I think the thread is going in other direction. You were asking for some solution to mentioned the consumption.............
    That can be taken care..........
    For 03 - "In process inspection" lot as yield confirmation by activating the STD function of SAP as I have mentioned in my last post.
    For 04 - "Inspection against GR form Production" lot, by stock posting.
    For any lot you can do customization in "EXIT_SAPLQEEM_011", to post the material consumption at each MIC/Operation valuation.
    But now the entire scenario what you are asking is bit confusing.
    You wrote
    I think for process order,
    quality activity confirmation we are talking
    & for this i have not maintained inspection
    point or inspection point identification.
    i am doing RR from qe11.
    It seems you we are talking about 03 type inspection lot. that you can relate with the option I have mentioned in the beginning of this reply.
    in my inspection plan for the material
    i have maintained 5 different characterstics
    in that row i can not see the sampling
    procedure,base unit of measure,
    base quantity all these field are gray in color
    i have defined sampling procedure also
    i have not maintained inspection point identification.
    Where you have mentioned these 5MICs?
    If it is inspection plan, then it will go with 04 Type.
    If it is Master Recipe/Routing, then it will go with 03 Type.
    Now the other point you wrote the MIC Line item have the fields GREY for Sampling Procedure,&...........&.......So to activate them,
    Select the line item for MIC, click on the Control Indicator (Sampling Procedure) and then you will be able to assign the Sampling Procedure to MIC.
    The fields "Inspect" & "Inspected" are related with the "Insp. Scope" with the MIC. The scope is define at the Control indicators for the MICs (On Page2 for the Indicators). There are four Radio Buttons to define the Inspection Scope.
    Scope not Fixed
    If you set this indicator, the number of inspected units is defined by the user for results recording.
    This number does not have to agree with the precalculated number of inspected units.
    E.g. If the the sample size for that particular MIC is not fixed ever and you will supposed to enter it at the time of RR you should define this indicator and the field will open for entry in QE11.
    Fixed Scope
    If you set this indicator, the number of inspected units must correspond
    to the precalculated number of units to be inspected for results
    recording.
    The system can perform a valuation for the inspection characteristic based on the number of nonconforming units or the number of defects in the sample.
    And the field will be GREY, non - modifiable.
    Similarly the larger and smaller scopes work.
    Best Regards,
    Shyamal

  • How to Map Fomulas for Float Glass Process

    Hi All,
    Can anybody suggest how to map formulas for float glass process.
    As in float Glass process continuous production is going on single line, within that continuous ingredients are added in furnace and molten glass mass is coming out. this molten glass is now adjusted to particular thickness and then finally cut into specific sizes as per cusotmer requirment.
    Final product is in various thickness, width and length.
    Entire process is automated.
    If anybody already implemented same scenario, please share knowledge.

    Hi
    The following is the mapping process and it is tricky process need to map carefully.
    You can define this as a single formula.
    Output: Packed - cut to size - Finished Good Item.
    Input: All the Raw materials (Sand, Dolamite, Limestone, Soda Ash, Sodium Sulphate, Carbon, Iron Oxide)
    Packaging materials + Labels + Boxes etc.
    Define Routing:
    Resource: Furnace, Any other importance resource like Equipment that controls thickness, cutter etc, Labor, Associated Overhead
    Create recipe using the formula and routing.
    Various factors that can affect the mapping:
    1) Formula maintenance: You have to define formula for each output item.
    2) Possibility of dynamic determination of output item: If it is possible to produce different combination of thickness/width (and hence different FG item) in the same batch, then this won't be the right mapping.
    3) Process variations: Also formula mapping depends on how accurate is production process. If user wants to produce item X (say thickness 10mm) but due to quality issue produced item Y (say thickness 9mm) and such cases happens very often, this won't be right solution.
    4) Inventory measurement: This will determine the break-points. If you cannot measure the quantity (or even estimate) then you cannot define it as an intermediate item.
    I will explain how point 4 can lead to different way of formula mapping.
    Say you have a furnace that needs to run continuously for better quality or throughput. Hence you will be continuously adding raw materials to furnace and produce different outputs. You can break the single formula into multiple formulas as -
    Formula 1) Output: Molten mass of glass
    Input: All the Raw materials (Sand, Dolamite, Limestone, Soda Ash, Sodium Sulphate, Carbon, Iron Oxide)
    Formula 2) Output: Packed - cut to size - Finished Good Item.
    Input: Molten mass of glass
    To have formula in such fashion you should have a way to measure or estimate the weight of Molten mass of glass.
    If you are estimating the weight, there should be historical data available to determine what should be realistic output quantity for given input quantity. How much will be process loss and loss due to unwanted by product such as slag etc.
    Further you can break formula 2 as
    Output: One large sheet of give thickness
    Input: Molten mass of glass
    Output: Packed - cut to size - Finished Good Item.
    Input: The large sheet of give thickness.
    This kind of different mapping is possible which normally depends on:
    1) Complexity of process
    2) How complex BOM structure user wants to have
    3) Are there any benefits of maintaining such complex system - like accurate costing or accurate production monitoring or facilitating planning process.
    4) Can user maintain the complex system? Are they ready to capture data at finer level. Is it possible to capture the data.
    5) And most important thing is how to handle exceptions. If every thing goes smoothly as planned (less exceptions) then user can have and afford any level of complexity. But if there are many exceptions to the normal process you have to concentrate more on how to handle the exceptions.
    6) Satisfy all users: Accounting, Planning, Production, Quality, Inventory handling. Formula/Recipe touches all these modules.
    Regards
    Raj
    Sierra

  • Issuing alternate maaterial in sub contratcing process

    Hi,
      In Subcontracting process here we are following outbound delivery process.
    After creating a subcontracting PO in me2o out bound delivery will be created.
    In Vl02n PGI will be done.
    While doing PGI if material as per existing BOM is not there then they are issuing alternate material .
    How we can address in SAP.
    Kindly give some input regarding this issue
    Thanks & regrads
    Venkat

    What do you mean by alternate material issued in case material as per bom not available? Do you mean if BOM material doesn't have stock then you use alternate material. If so it is not possible to transfer material to subcontractor wrt to purchase order.
    when will you come to know that material have no stocks? if it is before outbound delivery then change the component in purchase order.
    you can use alternate bom for this purpose.
    also If alternate material and bom material having same characteristics then you can transfer stock from material to material using 309 movement type.
    See subcontracting and Production versions
    When processing a purchase document item (type subcontracting),  the system determines the material BOM in accordance with the vendor you want to order from. These BOM versions of a material are stored in the material master as production  versions. Individual production versions are linked to suppliers either in the quota arrangement or in the purchasing info record.
    You order material M1 as item 10 of a subcontracting order. Different BOM versions are defined for this material, depending on whether you order the material from vendor X in the US or vendor Y in Japan.
    Subcontracting vendor X in the US has almost all components in stock, and these meet the required standard, so the BOM contains only 1 component.
    However, if you order from subcontracting vendor Y in Japan, you must provide 4 components, because this vendoru2019s components do not meet the standard for material M1.

  • BAPI_SalesOrder_CreateFromDat2 fails for items with free goods

    Hi all, I have a very weird problem when I am trying to create a sales order using SAP .net connector with the BAPI function BAPI_SalesOrder_CreateFromDat2().  The problem happens through the following scenario:
    1 - Item X has a free good rule on it that states "If user buys 5 Cartoons of Item X he will take 1 pack of Item Y free of charge" while Item Z has no rules like this
    2 - using BAPI and .net connector, an order is needed to be created with following details:
            a - Item X with quantity 6 Cartoons.
            b- Item Z with quantity 3 Cartoons
    3 - If BAPI_SalesOrder_CreateFromDat2() assigns these details to Order_Items_In with the same order (a then b),  SAP will return an error for Item z that states "No item category available (Table T184 ZKE NORM  KEN)."; while if the function tries to create the order with details in reverse order (b then a ), the order will be created successfully.
    I have done the following steps:
    1 - Tried the same order in SAP GUI but it succeeded. (So no problem in Item Category Determination)
    2 - Tries the same order with the suspicious order in the BAPI function Test inside SAP GUI (using tcode BAPI or SE37) but the function had not return any errors also.
    3 - Tried to send Item Category in code when calling the bapi function (Forced the code to KEN), but the same message appeared as SAP insist on redetermining the Item Category and return this meaningless message.
    thanks

    Hi Mohamed Abd Elbaset,
    I am facing the same issue while creating the Sales order through "BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2" All is going well in normal cases but when I process the contract with FREE GOODS line items for which free goods condition record is maintained it fails
    to create the Sales order. Is there any special treatment for this Free goods case..
    Regards,

  • How to set the conditions for item deletion approval workflow?

    Hi,
    I have created approval workflow for item modifications ie, when user try to modify an item, it will send a mail to Project Manager. For that I set the conditions in Change the behavior of the overall task: 1. When the task process starts 2 . When the task
     process completes .
    Change the behavior of the single task: 1.when a task is Pending.
    [I followed this https://www.nothingbutsharepoint.com/sites/eusp/Pages/5-Steps-to-Enhance-SharePoint-2010-Approval-Workflow.aspx ]
    My Requirement is that I want to set this same workflow for the scenario: when the user deletes an item it will send a mail (intimation mail for item deletion) to Project Manager. here i dont want to send modification mails when user deletes an item.
    When user modifies an item: 1. intimation mail, 2. Approve/Reject mail 3. intimation for approval / rejection mail.
    When user deletes an item: 1. intimation mail.
    How can we set it in one approval workflow?? where i have to set the condition for sending either item modification mails or deletion mail.
    Thanks,
    Praveen ji

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to start approval workflow when item deleted.
    You should first make some changes to trigger the workflow when you delete the item.
    You can use the Event Receiver to achieve it.
    In order to trigger workflow on item delete you need to create event receivers and from event receiver call the workflow already attached with list.
    http://ravendra.wordpress.com/sharepoint-workflow-on-list-item-delete/
    You can also create custom action to start the workflow, you can refer to the following article, then modify the workflow as your need.
    http://blogs.sharepoint911.com/blogs/jennifer/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=50
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • Getting status row for item '' activity id '' does not exist

    Hi,
    Need your help.
    Create a custom workflow SAMPRREQ. Its having following processes.
    1. Start Process
    2. Respond Notification.
    3. Function to update Table with the responded value.
    4. End process.
    After lauching the workflow, Notification send to the performer. Open the notification. When approver click the any of the result value (approve, reject, onhold) system giving followign message.
    3101: Status row for item 'SAMPRREQ/20130206161924', activity ID '242956' does not exist.
    I have seen some threads in the forums and bounce the database , purge the item type completly. But, still getting the error.
    Regards/Prasanth

    Sosa,
    When i run the wfstat nothing wrong in the info. unable to find the issue.
    But, i have narrow down the issue. In the function process in my workfow i am calling a custom function called update_approval_status_new.
    In this the value of the respond notification to be updated to a header table of this workflow and insert into events tables.
    When i comment these two dml ( update to header status & insert into events ) there is no error.
    Can any one tells me can i update and insert custom tables in workflow or not. If I want to do this, what is procedure.
    Regards/Prasanth

  • Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

    Hi,
    When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
    But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
    Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                    Yes/No
    1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
           Error when processing Production order
          Error when processing Production order
          Message no. V1380
          Diagnosis
            A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the  following meanings:
    1 = External block,  2 = General error,  3 = Insufficient data for the interface,  4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued.  Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
    2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
    "Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
    We are using the requierement class with below details:
    Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
    AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
    Settlement profile contain:
    Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
    If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
    The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
    Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
    Let me know if you need any further details.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    ADI

    Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
    What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

  • Issue: Proportion/produciton unit of measure NO is invalid for item 900001.

    Hi All,
       Issue: Proportion/produciton unit of measure NO is invalid for item 900001.
    Here we have MTO Scenario: In outbound delivery when we do batch split & batch determination we are getting the above error.
    Consider the following settings: at MM01 - Prodution/Proportion unit data is maintained with a characterstic specific to batch. Means Batch specific unit of measurement. In Work scheduling view produciton unit, unit of issue are maintained as 'NO'. All these settings  are same for all material codes.
    Please suggest us why we are getting the issue for perticular material coce.
    Info: We resolve the issue by adding one more line item in the sales order & do the transfer posting the stock from line item to line item. But this is not the permanent solution.
    Regards
    Chowdary

    I believe the error message no is VL 382 (Proportion/product unit of measure & invalid for item &)
    You need to double click on the error message flashing on the status bar to get the error number.
    I believe long text for the error message is self explainatary. Refer it and make necessary changes to resolve the issue.
    Diagnosis
    You want to use a proportion / product unit for an item.
    You are not allowed to change the unit of measure into a proportion / product unit if:
    - The following exist for a sales document item:
    Preceding documents
    Subsequent documents
    - You are processing a scheduling agreement for the component supply industry
    - You change the target unit of measure in a scheduling agreement item (and the sales unit is not a proportion / product unit)
    - You are processing a customer requirements plan
    - The following exist for a delivery item:
    Preceding documents
    Subsequent documents
    Batch split items
    - You are processing a batch split item
    Procedure
    Use a different unit of measure.
    If you want to change the target unit of measure into a proportion / product unit in a scheduling agreement item, you need to change the sales unit accordingly. The system then sets the target unit of measure to the same as the sales unit.
    Further, if you are working on older version, refer SAP Note 364206 - VLSP:indic.for proportion/product quantities deletd.
    Regards
    JP

  • In service order Issu:No account assignment found for this service process

    Issue:No account assignment found for this service process
    An error has occurred in the system RT1400LS while copying the document
    Message no. CRM_ORDER_MISC 020
    Diagnosis
    Errors have occured while transferring the document into another system. Remove the error messages from the enclosed log.
    Transmission log
    No account assignment found for this service process (Notification E CRM_SRV_LOG_EXT_OLTP 008)
    While we created the service order as a fallow up document of the quotation system unable to create the PR. System showing the above error in the service order.
    We created the service order with same items directly not as fallow up document to quotation PR created with out any fail.
    As per my analyses above error because system unable to find out the Internal order to create the PR hence we created service order as a fallow up document of the service quotation.
    Revert require data to understand the issue more.
    Best Regards,
    Prakesh

     Dear Gurus,
    Thanks for your update. we checked as per your suggestion but the issue is PR is not determining the IO while creating the PR.
    We used the different item cat in quotation and service order system generating the PR, But our Clint want to use the same item cat in the both service order and quotation.
    If we created the quotation after that service order with the service line item and spare part line item system creating the IO (internal order) but PR not generating.
    Please help me in this scenario what should we do.
    Best Regards,
    Prakesh.

  • I give up! - waiting for items to copy

    I know a lot has been said on the subject and I've said a few things myself.  However, I've about reached my breaking point and would love it if someone could point me the way to someone at Apple to talk to.
    I'm referring to syncing and the dreaded message generally at the end of the sync, "waiting for items to copy."  Sometimes the message will end after a long time (an hour) and all will seemingly be ok, and sometimes it will continue indefinitely.  I've tried virtually every suggestion here and from apple senior support.  I have had the same problem for well over a year with 2 iPads and 2 iPhones.  I've had syncing problems seemingly forever, back to 3 years ago when I had a MacBook Pro and after with my present computer, an iMac.  However, the problem was not the same previously, i.e., waiting for items to sync., in the past year or so.   It seems to be happening with more regularity now, like almost every time I want to completely change songs on my devices.
    If I interrupt the "waiting for items to copy," I often get a huge amount of "other" indicated in the bar graph in iTunes showing the amount of audio, apps, etc.
    I have a large library, almost 2TB and 80k songs.  I don't know if that's the problem.  I also have a 124gb iPad and 2 64gb iPhones.  I rotate the songs every few weeks... I have about 15 playlists set up randomly so I can just switch playlists.  As a result, I can rule out that corrupt songs are causing the problem unless there are a lot of corrupt songs.
    Without exaggeration, I must have talked to 10 senior apple technicians.  I'm covered by Apple Care on all but one of my 3 devices.  It's always a very lengthy conversation and doing mostly the same things over and over with call backs necessary.  And the problem doesn't get resolved.
    The only way I can seem to resolve the issue is by doing a complete erase on the device and syncing my songs 1 playlist at a time.  It's an incredibly lengthy process, especially when I try to sync normally at first and that fails - there went up to a few hours' time.
    However, I'm not so sure about this method any longer.  I sync'd my iPad yesterday, which took an entire day or about 15 hours.  After completely erasing everything and restoring, I sync'd 1 playlist at a time as previously mentioned.  I got the "waiting" message after each sync, but it eventually went away and all seemed fine.  That is, until I checked my iPad.  I should have had 22,000 songs (according to iTunes and a manual count of songs taking the totals from my playlists) but the iPad indicated only 12,000.
    If it is not an inherent problem with every version of iTunes and/or every OS in the last few years, the only other thing I can think of is that's my computer.  I am flinging my hands up in the air at this point and begging for a phone number of someone to talk to who can help.  Most of the senior iTunes reps claim they are unaware of the problem, which is baffling to me.

    (In response to Mike Stitzer's post):
    I'm a 30-year+ PC user (DOS then Windows) with a systems programming and admin background in Unix.  Apple is still a bit foreign to me, although not out of the realm of understanding.  The problems Apple now faces deal with (1) its popularity, which now makes it susceptible to the same kind of hacking-attacks that Windows has endured forever (which has nothing to do with these problems, granted); (2) complexity of the technology and (3) inexperience and/or lack of knowledge plus limited training of its customer & tech support staff (both of these being the central issues of this syncing problem). 
    You make a good point: these companies are now using "us" as their beta-testers. They don't thoroughly vet their products before releasing them into the market, and then leave it up to the users to find problems/bugs, and maybe even figure out how to fix them.  I don't know, honestly, but that's how it seems.  Maybe they don't care.  Maybe they know their client-base will remain steady and reliable because people still want to have iPads and iPhones and iPods.  And like all tech companies, Apple is always moving on to the next best thing, the newest upgrade features which lure their client-base to buy again, and attract new buyers.  Like any other company, their bottom line is what matters, and fixing problems, such as this sync one, may not be cost-effective enough to rise to the level of fixing, simply because it doesn't appear to be widespread enough, although who knows.  I know people who have iphones who NEVER connect them to their laptops for syncing, who buy music from iTunes from their iPhone and that's their music library.  That's the extent of their 'use.'  There are a lot of Apple customers, maybe a majority of users, who have no clue about ninety-percent of what is discussed in these forums. 
    In any event, for some reason, after I updated to the latest iTunes, I was able to sync my three "i" devices, iPhone--which was what I was having the trouble with; then the iPad and just the other day, my iPod Classic; all synced without problem.  Last Sunday I did, momentarily, have the "waiting to apply changes" stick while trying to sync some newly made ring tones to my iPhone, so I bailed out of the process, rebooted my (Windows 7) laptop, and tried again, and it took.  Don't ask me why.  I have no idea. 
    Regarding Windows... I have to say that since Microsoft's XP, I haven't had many problems with the system.  I had seriously considered getting a Mac the next time I get a new laptop, and just going "all Apple" but I'm definitely reconsidering that now.  With all the new products coming on the market now, I don't want to put all my cookies into one jar... you know?  Things change, that's a guarantee. 

  • Account Assignment Category for third party process.

    Hi ,
              I would like to use different account assignment category for third party process. This account assignment cat must be assigned at the sales order itself. Is there any config for this.
    Kindly help me.
    Ram.

    You can create new account assignment category for 3rd party process  by copying existing std one 2 in configuration under MM - Purchasing - Account assignment - maintain account assignment category
    You can assign your own set of control for account assignment based on requirement.
    SAP use TAS item catgory in 3rd Sales order which is linked to Pur Req account assignment catgory 2.If you are defining own account assignment catgory than you need to config set-up with TAS sales order item catgory.
    Hope above details will help to move further...sanjay karkun

Maybe you are looking for