Amount get Inventorized in J1iex

Hello
System automatically inventorized amount in transaction code J1iex during posting of the cenvat amount. It had been checked that material is neither categorized as N in J1id not any tick had been made in MRP during MIGO
Please provide the reason of such posting so that rectification can be done
Thanks in advance
Regards'
Anil Chawla

Thanks.
Condition type being used are same for all. It is happening for some material codes.
Thanks
Regards
Anil chawla

Similar Messages

ECS Is getting Inventorized As well Getting Credited for Assets

Hi Experts,
The following Scenario is for Procurement of Assets:
While doing the MIGO the amount in ECS is getting inventorized. In Excise Invoice ECS is also getting debited in RG23A accounts.
The ECS amount is getting doubled as there two entiries
1) Inventorized Duty
2)Cenvate Account -- RG23A ECS Debit.
Account Key Used in TAXIN procedure for ECS is Deductible.
For Raw Materials the entries are following the right way. The same procedure applies for everything.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Pavan P.

hi
pls check in Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction as per blw setting is ava or not?
CAPE          CR     ONHOLD
CAPE          DR     ONHOLD
CAPE          DR     RG23AED
CAPE          DR     RG23BED
CAPE          DR     RG23ECS
CAPE          DR     RG23SED
and "Account Key Used in TAXIN procedure for ECS is Deductible" , check in obcn, relevant a/c key, which assigned in the procedure, where deductible tick mark should not ticked.. pls check and revert

GRR reference not getting updated in J1IEX

Hi All,
We are capturing part 1 entry at our factory gate through j1iex_c.Then doing Goods receipt at stores through MIGO.
Now when we see vendor excise invoice in j1iex grr reference is not getting updated.
Awaiting responses.
Sandeep

Hi,
As per my knowledge we can capture the excise after receiving the goods only.
so your requirement is not possible . because we can post the excise with reference to vendor excise invoice number only it was given at the time of g/r in migo only.
Thanking you.

TDS amount getting wrong reverse in f-54

Hi experts
As per my knowledge tds is deducting twice. At the time of advance payment and invoice booking. and tds amount whichever is lower is getting reverse in f-54. But in my present scenario tds which is deducted at the time of invoice booking is getting reverse instead of tds which is deducted at the time of advance payment and i also check the tds amount is lower than tds amount of invoice.
This scenario has been occurred for only one vendor, In case of other vendors,its looks correct.
Please advise me .
Thanks&regards
D Roy

hello sir
Thanks for your early response.
According to my present scenario,At the time of Advance
Advance to sub contractor Rs.50000---dr.
tds payable on sub contractor Rs.500--cr.
Invoice
vendor Rs.100000---cr.
tds payable Rs.1000---cr.
in f-54 tds Rs.500 should get reverse but system reversing tds Rs.1000
Please advise

CVD VALUE GETTING INVENTORIZED IN IMPORT PO

Hi Friends,
In my Factory based stock transport PO for import purchase, I have mentioned CVD and EDB condition type. When I take receipt of the material, for the oubound delivery (plant A to plant B) , the CVD value is getting inventorised. Since I will be getting cenvat for this value , I want that not to add this value in the invetory value i.e. cost of the material. What settings is required so that this value donot add up in the material cost . I heard that CVD condition can be statistical and then JEDB can be calculated on it. Does anybody have got idea about this.
Or can anyone suggest any other alternate for this scenario.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Atul K

hi
CVD doesnt add to the material cost ,it is the customs duty which get inventorised
now ru doing STO or what
if it is the import purchase at a plnt then check following
in ur pricing u have to create following
JCDB IN: Basic Custom Duty
JCV1 IN : CVD
JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC Additional Duty of Custom
JCV1, JECV, J1CV and JADC will go to Excise MODVAT Accounts and JCDB, JEDB and JSDB will get loaded on inventory.
In M/06, for all above conditions, keep following controls;
Cond. class A (Discount or surcharge) Plus/minus A (Positive)
Calculat.type A (Percentage)
Cond.category B (Delivery costs)
Activate "Currency Conversion" and "Accrual"
Now for setoff
maintain the following conditions in excise default settings.
JCV1, JECV, JADC
path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
along with ur tax procedure maintain these conditions in the specified fields
JCV1 in CVD condition field.
JECV in ECS condition field.
JADC in ACD condition field.
in case of SECess on CVD, no need to maintain.
it is hardcode in the standard
Vendor in GR 2 (Entry always possible)
Import scenario
1.Create material master of import goods.
2. Create vendor master record of import vendor and Customs clearing vendor.
3. Maintain CIN settings.
4. Maintain J1id.
5. Maintain Pricing procedure SAP standard JIMPOR.., maintain required conditions..JCDB, JCV1...
6.Assign the schema to respective import vendor in purchasing view of VMR.
7. Create import PO, check in conditions of JCDB, JCV1 the customs clearing vendor(Indian vendor) and percentage is assigned. This can be done by In condition tab select condtion then click on display, then enter.
Save the PO.
8. MIRO --Capture Bill Of Entry.(Commercial Invoice No.,).Customs clearing first .Here CVD will b converted to BED.
9. Capture Excises invoice--j1iex.
10.MIGO.
12.Post Excise Invoice.
13.MIRO...Payment to vendor(import vendor)
PLEASE EXPLAIN THE SCENARIO
regards
kunal

Excise Base Amount Not Populated in J1IEX / MIGO in Imports

I have completed all following steps for Import process with CVD. CenVAT is to be taken on CVD.
Configuration
1. Maintain Import Pricing procedure with Conditions CVD, Cess and Ecess (JCV1, JECV, J1CV)
2. Create Nil Tax code in FTXP and assign to Company code
3. Maintained Excise Defaults for TAXINN with tax code created above and CVD conditions given
4. Maintained CVD account in Company code settings
5. Maintained OBYC settings
6. Checked Condition type PB00 details which are standard settings only.
Master Data
1. J1ID Raw material and Chapter ID details Maintained
2. J1ID Material Output material maintained
3. J1ID Vendor Excise Registration maintained with some placeholder characters
Transaction
1. Import PO in USD created and maintained values for CVD condition types with custom vendor assigned.
2. MIRO processed in INR for Custom duty vendor. CVD amount posted correctly.
3. During, J1IEX error is shown "Please check Excise base for the item is Zero! "
I searched other threads also. No significant help.
Please help me find where the actual problem is.

Hi Trivedi,
Check whether you have done the "Customs MIRO" in INR.
Additionally read this note carefully, the J1IEX part and check whether anything is missing.
1559145 - Frequently asked questions for Procurement in India:
CIN
Regards
Binoy

VAT amount get fixed for all the miro

when i am doing a miro, in the VAT G/L i am getting a fixed amount of VAT value i.e RS 29500.00. i have check in mking out 10 MIro . but the VAT value remain fixed.what should i do
regard
nabil

Hi,
VAT value is flowing from purchase order & VAT value depending the tax code available in the purchase order. You can check VAT value as % in FTXP t.code or FV13 with combination of tax code & VAT condition type.
As you are getting same vale of VAT now in MIRO(same vale of VAT should not come for all PO in MIRO), may be purchase orders are having same quantity. Now just cross check again & again by doing MIRO with other purchase orders without posting, just carry out simulate document, check accounting entries.
Regards,
Biju K

Amount getting rounded to hundreds in BSEG table

Hi,
I am passing an entry in TWD currency for 1000, but in BSEG table the field WRBTR gets updated as 10.
Any idea why this is happening so?
My conversion rate and exchange rate factors for this currency is 1:1 only
Regards
Malathi

Hi
The decimal notation is correct in su3 under default tab. For other currency my value is getting displayed with comma's and decimals.
Also the amount entered is only 1000 and not 10. For all the entries we have passed in TWD, BSEG-WRBTR is getting rounded to hundred's
Let me know on why this is happening
Regards
Malathi

Pricing question! "buy x amount, get one free" type items

Hi all,
I've been going through all of the portal but I haven't found anyone who has mentioned the ability to make this functionality work. We have a customer who would like to make an item where you can do a true buy 5, get one free type. There are many different names for this but nothing came up on any searches. It isn't a true discount percentage as the first 5 items are still at the original sale amount, we just want to include the 6th item at no charge.
We've been thinking of different methodologies to alert a sales employee when they select the item, but really we'd like it to work like the hierarchies and expansions. Any input would be appreciated, thanks!!
Michael

Hello Michael,
I had this situation and i solved it through an Addon. DI API to be exact. Hope this helps...

Excise amount not capturing in J1iex

hi,
i have done MIRO for customs & CVD payable. And in J1iex i have selected capture exise invoice and entered the PO number and commercial invoice number, then system is showing the line item with qty, but it is not given the excise breakup detail. It is giving blank. what will be the problem?an any one guide me on this.
govind.

While capturing J1IEX Vendor excise No should be given.

Secess dont get post at J1IEX for capital goods

1) craeted capital PO
2) Made GRN with part 1 updation
3 when post in J1IEX, and simulate, Secess dont come. remaining all comes
     ex
     CENVAT OH          515.00
     CENVAT on CG-BED     500.00
     CENVAT on CG-ECS     10.00
     PL-Vnd-CENVAT     1,025.00
CENVAT on CG-SECESS dont come, what is the problem, how to rectify?

Hi
In following path check
SPRO-Logistic general-India-account determination-specify Excise account per excise transaction
here for CAPE RG23 AT1 account should be there for debit
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Whenever I change my credit card related details, amount gets debited

Hi, multiple times amount has got debited for changing the card details. Is this the way iTunes Store works ?

I don't change my cards very often, but if I do, I usually see it as a $1 hold, not an actual charge in my credit card on-line statement. It would never show up on an actual paper statement.
Contact your bank if the hold has not been removed, 2 months is too long. If the issue is a $5 payment for a product you don't think you purchased, then contact iTunes, although I have never had that happen.

Sale order commitment amount not getting reduced

Dear Experts
Once the Sale order is created the SO committment amount gets updated in reports (commitment Vs Actual report) with"Forecast of Revenue" and Amount type 0100 (Original).
But after creation of Billing document (actuals) the same 'Forecast of Revenue' (commitment amount ) is not getting reduced with Amount type (0200). FM document is generated at the time of Billing document generation and the same is showing in reports from Invoice side.
The same cycle is happening in MM i.e, once PR/PO commitment will get reduced after actuals were happened.
Ex:
Ref doc     Item     Val.type text                       Amt type     Payment bdgt
100000     10     Forecast of Revenue     0100          100
20000     2     Invoices                          0100          100
Why SO commitment is not getting reduced in SD module?. Because of this reports are showing wrong.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks in advance
Rao

Dear Mar
Thanks for the support and tried all the possible ways but not able to find out the reaon:
a. FM Accounts assignments (CI, FC,Fund and BP) are same both Sale order and Billing documents.
b. There is no exits are activated.
c. It is happening all the sale orders and the reduction is completly missing.
d. For your reference please find the below commitment and Actuals report (FMRP_RFFMTO10X ).
Ref doc       Val.type text                    Amount type      CI              FC                Amount
100107       Forecast of Revenue              0100           100           ABC                 100
256487       Invoices                                   0100           100           ABC                 100
    Because of this when we check budget report the consumed amount is showing Rs. 200/-
e. And also we don't have any PGI concept, only after Sale order creation direct billing document will be generated.
Kindly suggest is there any configuration missing issue or something else.
Regarads
Rao

Excise Duty Base Amount in J1IEX in case of Import Purchasing

While posting Excise Invoice in case of Import Purchasing, duty values are coming from CVD, ACD, CVD Ecess & CVD SEcess. But I am not able to understand from where "Excise Duty Base Amount" is coming in J1IEX.
Can anyone throw light on this?
Thanks in advance

This is known that CVD, ACD, CVD Ecess & CVD SEcess are coming from PO u2013 MIRO and Excise default (in SPRO).
But my question is from where u201CExcise Duty Base Amountu201D is coming as it is neither maintained in PO nor in MIRO.
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance

Trouble trying to get correct AP Check Amount total on a report

Okay, the challenge is to try and explain my situation well. I am in Discoverer Plus. I am working to develop a Discoverer report that will show, for accounts payable application, a summary report by bank name and job number, a check count, invoice count, and check amount total. For simplicity sake, since I have the problem once I go past one table, I am dealilng with tables ap_checks_all and ap_invoice_payments_all from EBS, the tables joined on check id. Now, if I work just with the ap_checks_all table, I can easily get the correct sum of check amounts (column name in the table is AMOUNT). However when I bring in the invoice payments table, then I run into trouble. I first did the SUM data point for AMOUNT, and got a number that was way too high. Figured out that is because anytime I have multiple invoices on a check (which is most of the time), the check amount gets added in for each invoice. So if check amount is $100.00 and the check pays 5 invoices, $500.00 is added to the total amount, instead of the just the $100.00.
So I tried the SUM_DISTINCT function next - SUM_DISTINCT(AMOUNT). Got me a lot closer, but now my total was too low. Figured out that was because if I had separate checks with the same check amount, that check amount only gets added in one time. Say Check 18 is for $100.00 and Check 39 is for $100.00, I only get $100.00 into the total instead of $200.00. Which when you think about it, is exactly what the SUM_DISTINCT function means. Since the chances of check amounts being duplicated are low, that is why I get close to the right number, but when dealing with tens of thousands of checks, check amount duplication does happen.
So on my totals for the SUM_DISTINCT column, I finally figured out that a CELL SUM got me closer to the right number. I only had a problem now when, on the same bank name and job number, would still have duplicate check amounts at that key (group by) status level. Percentage wise, my error is low - off maybe $200,000 out of $180,000,000. So close to the right number, yet so far.
The same thing happens in raw SQL. If you think about the raw join result, you can see what is happening -
check 1, check 1 amount, invoice 1
check 1, check 1 amount, invoice 2
check 2, check 2 amount, invoice 3
check 3, check 3 amount, invoice 4
So if you do SUM(CHECK AMOUNT), well yeah, it will add in the check 1 amount twice.
If you do SUM_DISTINCT(CHECK AMOUNT), then check 1 amount only gets counted once. Great. Ahh, but what if check 3 amount = check 1 amount? Oops, the check 3 amount is excluded.
Does anyone know of a way to get around this problem? I have been playing around with the functions, but the SQL reference does not give many examples to help understand all the various optional parameters. I know, in vague concept, what I want. Something like -
SUM(AMOUNT) DISTINCT ON CHECK_ID, or
SUM_DISTINCT(AMOUNT) DISTINCT ON CHECK_ID.
CHECK_ID is the internal Oracle id number for each check, from the ap_checks_all table. Check number is not unique enough, since different bank accounts may be using the same check number in the same time period. So I want a way to be able to add my check amount to the total one time when there are multiple invoices on the check, and then get each invidual check amount (one time) added up to get my check total amount.
Like I said, no problems with Discoverer or raw SQL if doing just one table. But once I join checks to invoice payments, poof, I run into trouble.
I did not think I was trying to do anything unusual. So quite surprising that having so much trouble trying to find a way around this problem.
Hope this detail explanation makes some sense. Thanks for any help/insight anyone can give me.
John Dickey

Michael,
Nope, that does not work. It truly just gives me an average. My desired (table) report row format is this -
Bank name , Job Number, Check Count , Invoice Count , Check Amount Total
So this is a SUMMARY report. Not a detail report. If I do detail, I do not have any problems - I get my correct check amount total. If I do just the ap_checks_all table, I get the correct amount (but then cannot get my invoice count). I get the correct check count (count distinct on check id). I get the correct invoice count. When I added a calculation column using the Average function as you suggested, I see on each row what is likely the average check amount. Which is exactly what you would expect to see.
Now I did get a brainstorm and tried this. I calculated both the average and average distinct on check amount, then multiplied each by my check count. Darn. Still does not work. The Average Distinct * Check Count = SUM_DISTINCT(CHECK AMOUNT), which I already have. Average Distinct apparently only includes a duplicate check amount one time in calculating the average (which when you think about it, makes sense, darn it). The AVERAGE function still has the problem, it looks like, of including the check amount each time on checks with multiple invoices (and thus multiple rows in the join result) in determining the average. Which when you think about the raw join result from joining checks to invoice payments tables, makes sense. The result of AVERAGE * CHECK COUNT is better than the SUM(AMOUNT) column, but not as good as the SUM_DISTINCT(AMOUNT) column.
Any other ideas? Interesting that something that seems like a pretty basic thing to do, if it does have a solution, is not a very obvious/simple solution.
John Dickey

Amount get Inventorized in J1iex

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for