Analytics function taking time

Hi everyone ,
I have a table which has somewhere around 80,00,000 rows in oracle 11g
The table has the following structure (customer-id, amount,date).
I have to select cumulative total days wise and month-wise (sum starts with zero at the start of every month) .
I have used the following
Select
customer_id,
date,
sum(amount) over (partition by customer_id rows between unbounded pre..... ) DAY-WISE
sum(amount) over (partition by customer_id, to_char(date,'MM')) order by customer_id , date MONTH-WISE
from table
Index is on 1 >customer_id
2 > customer_id, to_char(date,'MM')
This query is still taking 30 mins......
Any ways of reducing the time will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

Hello
You don't need the customer_id in the order by part of that statement. it's not likely to be contributing a hude amount to the runtime but it's worth getting rid of any unnecessary parts of the statement. Overall though the issue is that you need to perform a window sort for each of the partition clauses so it may help to recode the statement so that you can use the same partition clause for both totals like so...
WITH src AS
(   SELECT 1 as cust_id, trunc(sysdate) + rownum as amt_date, rownum as amt FROM dual connect by level <=40
SELECT
    cust_id,
    amt_date,
    amt,
    SUM(amt) OVER(PARTITION BY cust_id ORDER BY amt_date) day_wise,
    SUM(amt) OVER(PARTITION BY cust_id ORDER BY amt_date RANGE BETWEEN amt_date - TRUNC(amt_date,'MM') PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW ) month_wise
FROM
    src
   CUST_ID AMT_DATE         AMT   DAY_WISE MONTH_WISE3
         1 19-JUL-11          1          1           1
         1 20-JUL-11          2          3           3
         1 21-JUL-11          3          6           6
         1 22-JUL-11          4         10          10
         1 23-JUL-11          5         15          15
         1 24-JUL-11          6         21          21
         1 25-JUL-11          7         28          28
         1 26-JUL-11          8         36          36
         1 27-JUL-11          9         45          45
         1 28-JUL-11         10         55          55
         1 29-JUL-11         11         66          66
         1 30-JUL-11         12         78          78
         1 31-JUL-11         13         91          91
         1 01-AUG-11         14        105          14
         1 02-AUG-11         15        120          29
         1 03-AUG-11         16        136          45
         1 04-AUG-11         17        153          62
         1 05-AUG-11         18        171          80
         1 06-AUG-11         19        190          99
         1 07-AUG-11         20        210         119
         1 08-AUG-11         21        231         140
         1 09-AUG-11         22        253         162
         1 10-AUG-11         23        276         185
         1 11-AUG-11         24        300         209
         1 12-AUG-11         25        325         234
         1 13-AUG-11         26        351         260
         1 14-AUG-11         27        378         287
         1 15-AUG-11         28        406         315
         1 16-AUG-11         29        435         344
         1 17-AUG-11         30        465         374
         1 18-AUG-11         31        496         405
         1 19-AUG-11         32        528         437
         1 20-AUG-11         33        561         470
         1 21-AUG-11         34        595         504
         1 22-AUG-11         35        630         539
         1 23-AUG-11         36        666         575
         1 24-AUG-11         37        703         612
         1 25-AUG-11         38        741         650
         1 26-AUG-11         39        780         689
         1 27-AUG-11         40        820         729
40 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3859139995
| Id | Operation                       | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |      |     1 |    22 |     3 (34)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | WINDOW SORT                    |      |     1 |    22 |     3 (34)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                          |      |     1 |    22 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    COUNT                        |      |       |       |            |          |
|* 4 |     CONNECT BY WITHOUT FILTERING|      |       |       |            |          |
|   5 |      FAST DUAL                  |      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - filter(LEVEL<=40)
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
          0 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
       1662 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        360 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          2 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
         40 rows processedObviously this is a much smaller result set than you are dealing with but I wanted to make sure I could replicate the partiton by customer_id, TO_CHAR(date,'MM'), just with the order by clause.
It would help a great deal if you were able to post your execution plans etc.
HTH
David

Similar Messages

PipeLine Function Taking time to return Table record

Hi,
I want to use a function in join clause. so i go for pipelined function(using for loop to get record & 1 more loop to fetch in table type variable). i achieved what i required. but problem is it takes much time to fetch data. is there any other approach which returns table records without pipelined function.
please suggest me a better approach as soon as possible.

Hi,
Thanks all for the quick response.
I am using oracle 10g
this is the table details & the entire function.
Create object & table type to use in the function
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SYSADM.STR_TYPE AS OBJECT(COLUMNVALUE VARCHAR2(8),FromNo Int,ToNo Int)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SYSADM.STR_ARRAY AS TABLE OF STR_TYPE
table involved
View : VesselType
column : Code varchar2(5)
Table : T065_SHIP
column : SKIPS_KODE varchar2(4)
CODE_SHIPTYPE varchar2(5)
Table : SelsKap
column : SELSKAPSKODE varchar2(4)
Table : t041_shiptypeusers
column : Code_ShipType varchar2(5)
USERID varchar2(8)
View : PositionBook
column : VesselCode varchar2(8)
VoyageNo integer
Company varchar2(4)
Table : T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP
column : SELSKAPSKODE varchar2(4)
BRUKER varchar2(8)
Pipelined function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION SYSADM.TF_ShiporShipTypeByUser
In_UserName IN VARCHAR2,
In_Type IN VARCHAR2,
In_VesselCode IN VARCHAR2,
In_CompanyHistory IN NUMBER DEFAULT 0
RETURN str_array PIPELINED AS
l_ShipTypeUser NUMBER(10,0);
l_CompanyUser NUMBER(10,0);
l_UseCompanyHistory NUMBER(1,0);
l_Snicsacct NUMBER(1,0);
BEGIN
BEGIN
SELECT shiptype_user,
company_user
INTO l_ShipTypeUser,
l_CompanyUser
FROM User_Segregation;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
l_ShipTypeUser := NULL;
l_CompanyUser := NULL;
END;
BEGIN
SELECT 1 INTO l_Snicsacct
FROM DUAL
WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM sn_user_cfg WHERE UserID='SNICS' and CfgID='ACCTSYS');
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
NULL;
END;
IF In_CompanyHistory = 1
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT CfgData
INTO l_UseCompanyHistory
FROM SN_User_Cfg
WHERE CfgID = 'USE COMPANY HISTORY'
AND UserID = 'SNICS';
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
l_UseCompanyHistory := 0;
END;
END IF;
IF In_UserName = 'SYSADM' OR (l_CompanyUser = 0 AND l_ShipTypeUser = 0)
OR (l_CompanyUser = 1 and l_Snicsacct =1 ) or (In_CompanyHistory = 0 and l_CompanyUser = 1 and In_Type ='ShipType')
OR (l_ShipTypeUser = 1 and In_Type = 'Company')
THEN
BEGIN
IF In_Type = 'ShipType'
THEN
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT Code ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM VesselType )
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
ELSIF In_Type = 'Ship'
THEN
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT SKIPS_KODE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP
WHERE SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode,SKIPS_KODE ))
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
ELSIF In_Type = 'Company'
THEN
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT SELSKAPSKODE ShipCode
, NULL VoyageFrom
, NULL VoyageTo
FROM SelsKap)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
END IF;
END;
ELSE
IF In_Type = 'Ship'
THEN
BEGIN
IF l_ShipTypeUser =1
THEN
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT S.SKIPS_KODE ShipCode
, 1 FromVoyage
, 999999999 ToVoyage
FROM T065_SHIP S
JOIN t041_shiptypeusers U
ON S.CODE_SHIPTYPE = U.Code_ShipType
AND USERID = In_UserName
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
GROUP BY S.SKIPS_KODE)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.FromVoyage,cur.ToVoyage));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
ELSIF l_CompanyUser = 1
THEN
BEGIN
IF l_UseCompanyHistory = 1 AND In_CompanyHistory = 1
THEN
FOR cur IN (SELECT a.VesselCode ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.Company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND b.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.VesselCode)
UNION
SELECT a.VesselCode ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.VesselCode)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.VesselCode,
a.VoyageNo,
a.VoyageNo)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
ELSE
FOR cur IN (SELECT a.SKIPS_KODE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.Company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND b.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE a.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.SKIPS_KODE)
AND NVL(l_UseCompanyHistory,0) = 0
UNION
SELECT a.SKIPS_KODE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE a.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.SKIPS_KODE)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.SKIPS_KODE)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END IF;
END;
END IF;
END;
ELSIF In_Type = 'ShipType'
THEN
IF l_ShipTypeUser = 1
THEN
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT S.CODE_SHIPTYPE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP S
JOIN t041_shiptypeusers U
ON S.CODE_SHIPTYPE = U.Code_ShipType
AND USERID = In_UserName
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
GROUP BY S.CODE_SHIPTYPE)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
ELSIF l_CompanyUser = 1
THEN
IF l_UseCompanyHistory = 1 AND In_CompanyHistory = 1
THEN
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT a.VesselType ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.COMPANY = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND b.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode,a.VesselCode)
UNION
SELECT a.VesselType ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.VesselCode)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.VesselType,
a.VoyageNo,
a.VoyageNo)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
ELSE
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT S.CODE_SHIPTYPE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP S
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON S.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND B.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
AND NVL(l_UseCompanyHistory,0) = 0
UNION
SELECT S.CODE_SHIPTYPE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP S
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON S.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
END IF;
END IF;
ELSIF In_Type = 'Company'
THEN
BEGIN
FOR cur IN (SELECT a.SELSKAPSKODE ShipCode
, NULL VoyageFrom
, NULL VoyageTo
FROM Selskap a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.SELSKAPSKODE = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE b.BRUKER = In_UserName
Union All
Select a.SELSKAPSKODE ShipCode
, NULL VoyageFrom
, NULL VoyageTo
From Selskap a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.SELSKAPSKODE = b.SELSKAPSKODE
Where b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.SELSKAPSKODE)
LOOP
PIPE ROW(str_type(cur.ShipCode,cur.VoyageFrom,cur.VoyageTo));
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
END IF;
END IF;
END;
select statement which i call the function it takes minimum 6 seconds to execute. It gives 8339 records
WITH deftbl AS ( SELECT /*+ CACHE(deftbl) */
/*+ result_cache */
a.VesselCode,
a.VoyageNo,
CASE a.BallastLeg When 0
THEN MIN(a.ArrivalDate)
ELSE NVL(( SELECT MAX(DepartureDate)
FROM PositionBook b
WHERE b.VesselCode = a.VesselCode
AND b.VoyageNo = (Select MAX(VoyageNo) From PositionBook c Where c.VesselCode = a.VesselCode and c.VoyageNo<a.VoyageNo)
),MIN(a.ArrivalDate))
END AS StartOfVoyage,
MAX(DepartureDate) EndOfVoyage
FROM PositionBook a
JOIN TABLE(*TF_ShiporShipTypeByUser*('BKA', 'Ship', NULL, 1)) D /*Calling the function*/
ON D.ColumnValue = a.VesselCode
AND a.VoyageNo BETWEEN D.FromVoyageNo AND D.ToVoyageNo
GROUP BY VesselCode,VoyageNo,a.BallastLeg )
SELECT /*+ result_cache */
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY a.VesselCode ORDER BY a.VoyageNo DESC) as "Row"
,a.VesselCode
,v.Name AS VesselName
,a.VoyageNo
,c.StartOfVoyage AS FromPort
,c.EndOfVoyage AS ToPort
/*,a.FROMPORT
,a.TOPORT*/
, CASE
WHEN ( SELECT PortName
FROM PositionBook b
WHERE b.VesselCode = a.VesselCode
AND b.VoyageNo = a.VoyageNo
AND SYSDATE BETWEEN ArrivalDate AND DepartureDate ) IS NOT NULL
THEN ( SELECT FIRST_VALUE(PortName) OVER(PARTITION BY b.vesselcode,b.VoyageNo ORDER BY b.vesselcode,b.VoyageNo,b.ArrivalDate,b.secondarytime)
FROM PositionBook b
WHERE b.VesselCode = a.VesselCode
AND b.VoyageNo = a.VoyageNo
AND SYSDATE BETWEEN ArrivalDate AND DepartureDate
AND ROWNUM=1
WHEN SYSDATE BETWEEN c.StartOfVoyage AND c.EndOfVoyage
THEN ( SELECT 'Steam From '||FIRST_VALUE(UPPER(PortName)) OVER(PARTITION BY b.vesselcode,b.VoyageNo ORDER BY b.vesselcode,b.VoyageNo,b.ArrivalDate desc,b.secondarytime desc)
FROM POSITIONBOOK b
WHERE b.VesselCode = a.VesselCode AND b.VoyageNo = a.VoyageNo
AND b.ArrivalDate<SYSDATE
AND ROWNUM=1
WHEN (c.StartOfVoyage-SYSDATE)>0
THEN 'Voyage Not Started'
WHEN (c.EndOfVoyage-SYSDATE)<0
THEN 'Voyage Completed'
ELSE Null
END "Location"
,( SELECT MIN(b.PortName) KEEP(DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY b.ArrivalDate,b.secondarytime) OVER(PARTITION BY b.VesselCode,b.VoyageNo)
FROM POSITIONBOOK b
WHERE b.VesselCode = a.VesselCode AND b.VoyageNo = a.VoyageNo
AND b.ArrivalDate>SYSDATE
AND ROWNUM=1
) AS NextPort
, ( SELECT MIN(b.ArrivalDate) KEEP(DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY b.ArrivalDate,b.secondarytime) OVER(PARTITION BY b.VesselCode,b.VoyageNo)
FROM POSITIONBOOK b
where b.VesselCode = a.VesselCode AND b.VoyageNo = a.VoyageNo
AND b.ArrivalDate>SYSDATE
AND ROWNUM=1
) AS NextETA
,a.STATUS VoyageStatus
,a.Trade
,UFN_MyVoyConcatinate_Values('FIXNOTE', a.VesselCode, a.VoyageNo) FixNote
,UFN_MyVoyConcatinate_Values('CHARTERER', a.VesselCode, a.VoyageNo) Charterer
,CASE WHEN st.CurrentStatus=0
THEN 1
WHEN st.CurrentStatus=1
THEN 0
ELSE st.CurrentStatus
END AS CurrentStatus
FROM Positionbook a
JOIN deftbl c
ON a.VesselCode = c.VesselCode
AND a.VoyageNo = c.VoyageNo
JOIN Vessel v
ON v.Code = c.VesselCode
LEFT JOIN GTT_VOYAGESTATUS st
ON st.VesselCode = c.Vesselcode
AND st.VoyageNo = c.VoyageNo
GROUP BY a.VesselCode
, v.Name
, a.VoyageNo
, c.StartOfVoyage
, c.EndOfVoyage
/*, a.FROMPORT
, a.TOPORT*/
, a.Status
, a.Trade
, st.CurrentStatus;
Note:
i changed the function without pipelined also. but it doesnt show much difference
non pipelined function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION TF_ShiporShipTypeByUser_nonp
In_UserName IN VARCHAR2,
In_Type IN VARCHAR2,
In_VesselCode IN VARCHAR2,
In_CompanyHistory IN NUMBER DEFAULT 0
RETURN str_array AS
l_ShipTypeUser NUMBER(10,0);
l_CompanyUser NUMBER(10,0);
l_UseCompanyHistory NUMBER(1,0);
l_Snicsacct NUMBER(1,0);
l_str_array str_array:=str_array();
BEGIN
BEGIN
SELECT shiptype_user,
company_user
INTO l_ShipTypeUser,
l_CompanyUser
FROM User_Segregation;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
l_ShipTypeUser := NULL;
l_CompanyUser := NULL;
END;
BEGIN
SELECT 1 INTO l_Snicsacct
FROM DUAL
WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM sn_user_cfg WHERE UserID='SNICS' and CfgID='ACCTSYS');
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
NULL;
END;
IF In_CompanyHistory = 1
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT CfgData
INTO l_UseCompanyHistory
FROM SN_User_Cfg
WHERE CfgID = 'USE COMPANY HISTORY'
AND UserID = 'SNICS';
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
l_UseCompanyHistory := 0;
END;
END IF;
IF In_UserName = 'SYSADM' OR (l_CompanyUser = 0 AND l_ShipTypeUser = 0)
OR (l_CompanyUser = 1 and l_Snicsacct =1 ) or (In_CompanyHistory = 0 and l_CompanyUser = 1 and In_Type ='ShipType')
OR (l_ShipTypeUser = 1 and In_Type = 'Company')
THEN
BEGIN
IF In_Type = 'ShipType'
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(Code,1,999999999)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM VesselType;
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
ELSIF In_Type = 'Ship'
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(SKIPS_KODE,1,999999999)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM T065_SHIP
WHERE SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode,SKIPS_KODE);
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
ELSIF In_Type = 'Company'
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(SELSKAPSKODE,NULL,NULL)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM SelsKap;
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
END IF;
END;
ELSE
IF In_Type = 'Ship'
THEN
BEGIN
IF l_ShipTypeUser =1
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(S.SKIPS_KODE,1,999999999)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM T065_SHIP S
JOIN t041_shiptypeusers U
ON S.CODE_SHIPTYPE = U.Code_ShipType
AND USERID = In_UserName
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
GROUP BY S.SKIPS_KODE;
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
ELSIF l_CompanyUser = 1
THEN
BEGIN
IF l_UseCompanyHistory = 1 AND In_CompanyHistory = 1
THEN
SELECT STR_TYPE(ShipCode,VoyageFrom,VoyageTo)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM ( SELECT a.VesselCode ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.Company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND b.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.VesselCode)
UNION
SELECT a.VesselCode ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.VesselCode)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.VesselCode,
a.VoyageNo,
a.VoyageNo);
RETURN l_str_array;
ELSE
SELECT STR_TYPE(ShipCode,VoyageFrom,VoyageTo)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM (SELECT a.SKIPS_KODE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.Company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND b.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE a.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.SKIPS_KODE)
AND NVL(l_UseCompanyHistory,0) = 0
UNION
SELECT a.SKIPS_KODE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE a.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.SKIPS_KODE)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.SKIPS_KODE);
RETURN l_str_array;
END IF;
END;
END IF;
END;
ELSIF In_Type = 'ShipType'
THEN
IF l_ShipTypeUser = 1
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(ShipCode,VoyageFrom,VoyageTo)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM (SELECT S.CODE_SHIPTYPE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP S
JOIN t041_shiptypeusers U
ON S.CODE_SHIPTYPE = U.Code_ShipType
AND USERID = In_UserName
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
GROUP BY S.CODE_SHIPTYPE);
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
ELSIF l_CompanyUser = 1
THEN
IF l_UseCompanyHistory = 1 AND In_CompanyHistory = 1
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(ShipCode,VoyageFrom,VoyageTo)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM ( SELECT a.VesselType ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.COMPANY = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND b.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode,a.VesselCode)
UNION
SELECT a.VesselType ShipCode
, a.VoyageNo VoyageFrom
, a.VoyageNo VoyageTo
FROM PositionBook a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE a.VesselCode = NVL(In_VesselCode, a.VesselCode)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.VesselType,
a.VoyageNo,
a.VoyageNo);
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
ELSE
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(ShipCode,VoyageFrom,VoyageTo)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM ( SELECT S.CODE_SHIPTYPE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP S
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON S.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
AND B.BRUKER = In_UserName
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
AND NVL(l_UseCompanyHistory,0) = 0
UNION
SELECT S.CODE_SHIPTYPE ShipCode
, 1 VoyageFrom
, 999999999 VoyageTo
FROM T065_SHIP S
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON S.company = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE S.SKIPS_KODE = NVL(In_VesselCode, S.SKIPS_KODE)
AND b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL);
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
END IF;
END IF;
ELSIF In_Type = 'Company'
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT STR_TYPE(ShipCode,VoyageFrom,VoyageTo)
BULK COLLECT INTO l_str_array
FROM ( SELECT a.SELSKAPSKODE ShipCode
, NULL VoyageFrom
, NULL VoyageTo
FROM Selskap a
JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.SELSKAPSKODE = b.SELSKAPSKODE
WHERE b.BRUKER = In_UserName
Union All
Select a.SELSKAPSKODE ShipCode
, NULL VoyageFrom
, NULL VoyageTo
From Selskap a
LEFT JOIN T62_BRUKER_SELSKAP b
ON a.SELSKAPSKODE = b.SELSKAPSKODE
Where b.SELSKAPSKODE IS NULL
GROUP BY a.SELSKAPSKODE);
RETURN l_str_array;
END;
END IF;
END IF;
END;please kindly provide me your valuable suggestions
Edited by: ganex27lin on Mar 16, 2011 1:54 AM

Select query taking time

THe following query is taking time. Is there anyway better to write this query.
SELECT PROGRAM_NAME_ID ,PROGRAM_NAME,sum(balance)"Unpaid Balance"
    FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT
PROGRAM_NAME_ID ,PROGRAM_NAME,
t.billing_key billing_key,
(TUFF_GENERIC_PKG.GET_TOTAL(t.billing_key,t.program_key)+
nvl(PENALTY_INTEREST(t.billing_key,t.program_key,b.company_id,b.report_period ),0))
-PAYMENT_AMOUNT(B.COMPANY_ID,T.PROGRAM_KEY,B.REPORT_PERIOD) Balance,
Report_period,company_id
FROM BILLING B,
PROG_SURCH T ,
mv_program_dict P
WHERE
B.BILLING_KEY=T.BILLING_KEY
AND p.program_key= t.program_key(+)
and company_id=:p3_hide_comp
and b.SUBMIT_STATUS='S'
union
SELECT DISTINCT
PROGRAM_NAME_ID ,PROGRAM_NAME,
t.billing_key billing_key,
(TUFF_GENERIC_PKG.GET_TOTAL(t.billing_key,t.program_key)+
nvl(PENALTY_INTEREST(t.billing_key,t.program_key,b.company_id,b.report_period ),0))
-PAYMENT_AMOUNT(B.COMPANY_ID,T.PROGRAM_KEY,B.REPORT_PERIOD) Balance,
Report_period,company_id
FROM MV_BILLING B,
MV_PROG_SURCH T ,
mv_program_dict P
WHERE
B.BILLING_KEY=T.BILLING_KEY
AND p.program_key= t.program_key(+)
and company_id=:p3_hide_comp
order by report_period,program_name_id )
where balance>=0
GROUP BY PROGRAM_NAME_ID,PROGRAM_NAME
ORDER BY PROGRAM_NAME_ID

Hi,
This is totally right.
>
Being one such call. The price for calling pl/sql functions in SQL can be quite high. I'd highly recommend you find a way to incorporate the pl/sql code into the SQL query.
>
but, try with this query. I hope would help you and return the rows you want.
SELECT   program_name_id, program_name,
           SUM ( tuff_generic_pkg.get_total (billing_key, program_key)
                + NVL (penalty_interest (billing_key,
                                         program_key,
                                         company_id,
                                         report_period
                       0
         - payment_amount (company_id, program_key, report_period) balance
    FROM (SELECT program_name_id, program_name, t.billing_key, t.program_key,
                 b.company_id, b.report_period
            FROM billing b, prog_surch t, mv_program_dict p
           WHERE b.billing_key = t.billing_key
             AND p.program_key = t.program_key(+)
             AND company_id = :p3_hide_comp
             AND b.submit_status = 'S'
          UNION
          SELECT program_name_id, program_name, t.billing_key, t.program_key,
                 b.company_id, b.report_period report_period, company_id
            FROM mv_billing b, mv_prog_surch t, mv_program_dict p
           WHERE b.billing_key = t.billing_key
             AND p.program_key = t.program_key(+)
             AND company_id = :p3_hide_comp) sub
   WHERE   ( tuff_generic_pkg.get_total (billing_key, program_key)
            + NVL (penalty_interest (billing_key,
                                     program_key,
                                     company_id,
                                     report_period
                   0
         - payment_amount (company_id, program_key, report_period) >= 0
GROUP BY program_name_id, program_nameObviosly I cannot testing.
HTH -- johnxjean --

Publishing and Overwriting a Universe, Updates new measures quickly in Business Explorer / Information Spaces but taking time in dashboard to be updated.

Hi gurus:
I have a continuous problem while Publishing and Overwriting a Universe from IDT, new measures UPDATES quickly in Business Explorer / Information Spaces but taking time in dashboard to be updated. it approximately takes half an hour to be updated while accessing universe from dashboards.
Regards:
Jawad Khalid

Hi gurus:
I have a continuous problem while Publishing and Overwriting a Universe from IDT, new measures UPDATES quickly in Business Explorer / Information Spaces but taking time in dashboard to be updated. it approximately takes half an hour to be updated while accessing universe from dashboards.
Regards:
Jawad Khalid

In one website, it takes to much time to load the page, in other site its not taking time, so do i need to enable or change any settings

in one website, its taking time to load the page, on other PC its not taking any time( with internet explorer) in my PC other websites are opening quickly but this website takes too much time with firefox

Zepo wrote:
My iMac has been overwhelmed almost since I bought it new. After some digging the guiness bar suggested its my Aperture library being on the same
internal Tera byte drive as my operating system.
Having a single internal hard drive overfilled (drives slow as they fill) is very likely contributing to your problems, but IMO "my Aperture library being on the same internal Tera byte drive as my operating system" is very unlikely to be contributing to your problems. In fact the Library should stay on an underfilled (roughly, for speed, I would call ~half full "underfilled") internal drive, not on the Drobo.
Instead build a Referenced-Masters workflow with the Library and OS on an internal drive, Masters on the Drobo, OS 10.6.8 (there have been issues reported with OS 10.7 Lion). Keep Vault backup of the Library on the Drobo, and of course back up all Drobo data off site.
No matter what you do with i/o your C2D Mac is not a strong box for Aperture performance. If you want to really rock Aperture move to one of the better 2011 Sandy Bridge Macs, install 8 GB or more of RAM and build a Referenced-Masters workflow with the Library and OS on an internal solid state drive (SSD).
Personally I would prefer investing in a Thunderbolt RAID rather than in a Drobo but each individual makes his/her own network speed/cost decisions. The Drobo should work OK for referenced Masters even though i/o is limited by the Firewire connection.
Do not forget the need for off site backup. And I suggest that in the process of moving to your new setup it is most important to get the data safely and redundantly copied and generally best to disregard how long it may take.
HTH
-Allen Wicks

Why does that entire thread goes to sleep when we put a wait function in time critical loop?

why does that entire thread goes to sleep when we put a wait function in time critical loop but not when it is not time critical

Norbert B wrote:
Ujjval,
in a RT system, priorities have (in general) increased effect on the execution of the application.
It is recommended that you only have a single task in your RT program at "time critical". If you have two task "time critical" (that means you are running into issues caused by your quoted "feature"), you have a flaw in your application architecture.
Since LV 7.1, it is recommended to work with Timed Loops in order to prioritize tasks on a RT system. Timed Loops are executed on priorities between "time critical" and "above normal". Each Timed Loop will execute its content in a single thread in order to keep a good overview of the timing (like finished late [i-1]). Using those structures (and according settings) in a reasoned manner will prevent your RT system to run into priority issues.
Ujjval Shah wrote:
[...]also i would really appreciate if i can get more documentations regarding how LV creates threads and assigns subvis to them[...]
You will have a real hard time to go into this very deep. This is the feature of LV: you can just use multithreading (multicores) without the needed knowledge of scheduling and load balancing. This makes LV programming in general very easy in comparison to e.g. ANSI C (in regard of multithreading). So creation of threads, distribution of tasks to the threads are abstracted and most often not visible to the programmer.
There are some switches and levers you can "play around" in order to make LV to behave differently in this matter. But this most often requires deep LV knowledge and cannot be explained in a simple posting.....
hope this helps,
Norbert
Amen to that!
The question can not be fully answered without digging into the internals of the OS LV is run on because LV works with the OS and lets it do the scheduling.
Yes that note applies to pre- LV 7 RT. When run under RT the ONE Time Critical loop was guarenteed to stay determinisitic.
Since then the Timed Loop was introduced that allowed multiple levels of priority and later allowed us to assign which CPU the code would run on.
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Prcedure taking time

Hello Experts,
I am running a procedure which is taking too much time during execution. How can I found that which statement or query in the procedure is taking time. Is there any package available to check this out.
Thanks & Regards,
Manish

Execute the below query to find out the session id of the session in which your procedure is getting executed.
[c]
SELECT s.sid
,s.serial#
,ddl.name
,ddl.type
,ddl.owner
,s.status
,s.osuser
,s.machine
FROM dba_ddl_locks ddl
,v$session s
WHERE ddl.session_id = s.sid;
[\c]
Once you get the sid,execute the below query to know which DML its executing:
[c]
SELECT /*+ leading(s) */
s.sid
,s.serial#
,st.piece
,st.sql_text
,s.status
,s.osuser
,s.machine
FROM v$session s
,v$sqltext st
WHERE s.sql_hash_value = st.hash_value(+)
AND s.sid = &sid_from_above_query
ORDER BY st.piece;
[\c]
Regards
Arun

JSP taking time to load

Hi All
I am having a strange problem. The JSP file is taking to much of time to load and the IE doesnot responds properly even after the the page is loaded. I agree that the JSP has significant amount of Java code in it. What could be the problem?? The response from the server is coming fast. The page is taking time after recieving the response from server.
Regards
Prashant

What could be the problem??Slow hardware, slow code, perhaps some other app is eating your resources, could be anything really. I think its time for a profiler.
The JSP file is taking to much of time to load and the IE doesnot responds properly even after the the page is loadedIE is the best browser for improper behavior, but how exactly is it misbehaving in your case? It might be a bad piece of javascript that is causing it head aches.

Using Materilaized view in a query .. query is taking time????

Hi I have a query :-
SELECT rownum as id, u.last_name, u.first_name,u.phone phone, u.empid,u.supervisor id
FROM emp_view u -- using view
CONNECT BY PRIOR u.empid = u.supervisor_id
START WITH u.sbcuid = 'ph2755';
here emp_view is a view .
------ The above query is taking 3 sec to execute.
Then I created Materialuized view emp_mv and the the MV query is same as emp_view view query.
After this i executed following sql
SELECT rownum as id, u.last_name, u.first_name,u.phone phone, u.empid,u.supervisor id
FROM emp_mv u -- using materialized view
CONNECT BY PRIOR u.empid = u.supervisor_id
START WITH u.sbcuid = 'ph2755';
this query is taking 15 sec to execute..... :(
can anyone please tell me why MV query is taking time????

Hi,
In your first case you query a view, meaning that you query the underlying tables. These probably have indexes and stats are updated.
In you second case you query a materialized view, meaning that you query the underlying base table of that mview.
This probably do not have the same indexes to support that query.
But of course, I'm just guessing based on the little information provided.
If you want to take this further, please search for "When your query takes too long" and "How to post a tuning request".
These two threads holds valuable information, not only on how to ask this kind of question, but also how to start solving it on your own.
Regards
Peter

Gl posting is taking time

Hi All,
Everyday we run a gl process. Gl posting is taking more 1 hr. Same way 4 gl posting run during gl process which is causing
performance delay.
I see in the the log file that below stage is taking time.
glpibr.concurrency() 02-MAR-2013 08:13:03
glpibr.concurrency() 02-MAR-2013 08:13:03
glpidb() 02-MAR-2013 08:46:41
glpidb() 02-MAR-2013 08:49:59
glpibr() 02-MAR-2013 08:49:59
This process itself takes more than 30 hours. It varies everyday. Sometime it takes 1 hr also.
insert into gl_balances
( set_of_books_id, code_combination_id, currency_code, period_name,
actual_flag, budget_version_id, encumbrance_type_id, last_update_date,
last_updated_by, period_type, period_year, period_num, period_net_dr, period_net_cr,
period_to_date_adb, quarter_to_date_dr, quarter_to_date_cr, quarter_to_date_adb, year_to_date_adb,
project_to_date_dr, project_to_date_cr, project_to_date_adb, begin_balance_dr, begin_balance_cr,
period_net_dr_beq, period_net_cr_beq, begin_balance_dr_beq, begin_balance_cr_beq, template_id, translated_flag )
select pi.set_of_books_id, pi.code_combination_id, pi.currency_code, pi.period_name, pi.actual_flag, pi.budget_version_id, pi.encumbrance_type_id, sysdate, :fnd_user_id, pi.period_type, pi.period_year, pi.period_num, 0, 0, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL,
0, 0, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, pi.template_id, pi.translated_flag from gl_posting_interim_50130 pi where not exists ( select 'X' from gl_balances b where b.set_of_books_id = pi.set_of_books_id and b.code_combination_id = pi.code_combination_id and b.currency_code = pi.currency_code and
b.period_name = pi.period_name and b.actual_flag = pi.actual_flag and
nvl(b.encumbrance_type_id, -1) = nvl(pi.encumbrance_type_id, -1) and
nvl(b.budget_version_id, -1) = nvl(pi.budget_version_id, -1) and decode(b.translated_flag, '', '-1', 'Y', '0', 'N', '0', 'R', '1', b.translated_flag) = decode(pi.translated_flag, '', '-1', 'Y', '0', 'N', '0', 'R', '1', pi.translated_flag) )Above query is taking more than 30 mins as i can see in awrreport . As per metalink note id - 1096873.1 it is due to gl_posting_interim tables which is locking the another gl_interim_posting tables. I dont see any lock but i can see lots of gl_posting_interim present in the database. As per my knowledge this table must be dropped after posting got over.
Env details -
Apps version - 11.5.10.2
DB version - 11.2.0.1
OS - IBM AIX 6.1
Please suggest.
Thanks

Please see these docs.
R11i GLTTRN Translation Performance Issue In INSERT INTO GL_BALANCES [ID 761898.1]
Information Center: Optimizing Performance for Oracle General Ledger [ID 1489537.2]
Performance Issue With Translation Program After Upgrading To 10G Database [ID 742025.1]
Deleting Summary Accounts Has Poor Performance [ID 1088585.1]
GL Posting Performance Issue at glpip2() [ID 280641.1]
GLPPOS Performance Issue After 9i To 10g Upgrade in gluddl.lpc [ID 1262020.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

How to know which sql query is taking time for concurrent program

Hi sir,
I am running concurrent program,that is taking time to execute ,i want to know which sql query causing performance
Thanaks,
Sreekanth

Hi,
My Learning: Diagnosing Oracle Applications Concurrent Programmes - 11i/R12
How to run a Trace for a Concurrent Program? (Doc ID 415640.1)
FAQ: Common Tracing Techniques in Oracle E-Business Applications 11i and R12 (Doc ID 296559.1)
How To Get Level 12 Trace And FND Debug File For Concurrent Programs (Doc ID 726039.1)
How To Trace a Concurrent Request And Generate TKPROF File (Doc ID 453527.1)
Regards
Yoonas

Insert statement taking time on oracle 10g

Hi,
My procedure taking time in following statement while database upgrading from oracle 9i to oracle 10g.
I m using oracle version 10.2.0.4.0.
cust_item is matiralize view in procedure and it is refreshing in the procedure
Index is dropping before inserting data into cust_item_tbl TABLE and after inserting data index is created.
There are almost 6 lac records into MV which are going to insert into TABLE.
In 9i below insert statement is taking 1 hr time to insert while in 10g it is taking 2.30 hrs.
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL QUERY';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL DML';
INSERT INTO /*+ APPEND PARALLEL */ cust_item_tbl NOLOGGING
         (SELECT /*+ PARALLEL */
                 ctry_code, co_code, srce_loc_nbr, srce_loc_type_code,
                 cust_nbr, item_nbr, lu_eff_dt,
                 0, 0, 0, lu_end_dt,
                 bus_seg_code, 0, rt_nbr, 0, '', 0, '', SYSDATE, '', SYSDATE,
                 '', 0, ' ',
                               case
                             when cust_nbr in (select distinct cust_nbr from aml.log_t where CTRY_CODE = p_country_code and co_code = p_company_code)
                             THEN
                                     case
                                        when trunc(sysdate) NOT BETWEEN trunc(lu_eff_dt) AND trunc(lu_end_dt)
                                        then NVL((select cases_per_pallet from cust_item c where c.ctry_code = a.ctry_code and c.co_code = a.co_code
                                                      and c.cust_nbr = a.cust_nbr and c.GTIN_CO_PREFX = a.GTIN_CO_PREFX and c.GTIN_ITEM_REF_NBR = a.GTIN_ITEM_REF_NBR
                                                      and c.GTIN_CK_DIGIT = a.GTIN_CK_DIGIT and trunc(sysdate) BETWEEN trunc(c.lu_eff_dt) AND trunc(c.lu_end_dt) and rownum = 1),
                                                      a.cases_per_pallet)
                                  else cases_per_pallet
                              end
                      else cases_per_pallet
                 END cases_per_pallet,
                 cases_per_layer
            FROM cust_item a
           WHERE a.ctry_code = p_country_code ----varible passing by procedure
             AND a.co_code = p_company_code   ----varible passing by procedure
             AND a.ROWID =
                    (SELECT MAX (b.ROWID)
                       FROM cust_item b
                      WHERE b.ctry_code = a.ctry_code
                        AND b.co_code = a.co_code
                        AND b.ctry_code = p_country_code ----varible passing by procedure
                        AND b.co_code = p_company_code   ----varible passing by procedure
                        AND b.srce_loc_nbr = a.srce_loc_nbr
                        AND b.srce_loc_type_code = a.srce_loc_type_code
                        AND b.cust_nbr = a.cust_nbr
                        AND b.item_nbr = a.item_nbr
                        AND b.lu_eff_dt = a.lu_eff_dt));explain plan of oracle 10g
Plan
INSERT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 133,310 Bytes: 248 Cardinality: 1
     5 FILTER
          4 HASH GROUP BY Cost: 133,310 Bytes: 248 Cardinality: 1
               3 HASH JOIN Cost: 132,424 Bytes: 1,273,090,640 Cardinality: 5,133,430
                    1 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX MFIPROCESS.INDX_TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV Cost: 10,026 Bytes: 554,410,440 Cardinality: 5,133,430
                    2 MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL MAT_VIEW MFIPROCESS.TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV Cost: 24,570 Bytes: 718,680,200 Cardinality: 5,133,430 can you please look into the issue?
Thanks.

According to the execution plan you posted parallelism is not taking place - no parallel operations listed
Check the hint syntax. In particular, "PARALLEL" does not look right.
Running queries in parallel can either help performance, hurt performance, or do nothing for performance. In your case a parallel index scan on MFIPROCESS.INDX_TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV using the PARALLEL_INDEX hint and the PARALLEL hint specifying the table for MAT_VIEW MFIPROCESS.TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV Cost might help, something like (untested)
select /*+ PARALLEL_INDEX(INDX_TEMP_CST_AUTH_PERF_MV) PARALLEL(TEMP_CUST_AUTHPERF_MV) */Is query rewrite causing the MVs to be read? If so hinting the query will be tricky

Transfer of XML through a firewall is taking time

Hi,
I have following scenario:
Publisher BPEL --> || Firewall || Subscriber BPEL
Now the XML is being transferred over the firewall is around 9MB.
When these two BPEL processes are deployed on local intranet, the transfer of XML is too fast and Subscriber BPEL completes within seconds. But when above two BPEL are deployed over the internet with firewall in-between, XML transfer is taking time of about 15 Minutes.
Is there a solution to reduce the XML transfer time or some work-around to handle such issue?
Thanks,
Bhavnesh.

If it is a 9mb file this is quite large, I think this will come down to latency and bandwidwth. Test form your environment how long does it take to download a 9mb, then from the remote location. If this takes around 15 mins to perform then there is little you can do but get a better ISP.
I doubt the issue will be with the firewall.
cheers
James

Application server 10g R2 taking time to load.

hi all.
i am using oracle Application server 10g R2 when i boot my windows server 2003 R2 then
its taking time to load application server more than 5 min what is the problem
why its taking time to load?
any onw knows?

JVM (java virtual machine) If you have a full stack, infrastructure + BI forms you need 2 gb at least only to install, if you plan to make some work on it it could happen that the computer get very slow.
In opmn.xml file, in the seccion for the home container (or other you are using) there is a line for Start Parameters, there you have to use the -Xmx1024M to se the maximum JVM size to 1gb, for this you will have to restart the proc.
For forms also there are some procs where you manage the size of the memory and procs, you can see this in the Configuration Seccion into the EM Console.
Regards

I want to know what should do if the SPID : 12 Checkpoint is taking time.

Hi Team,
I want to know what should do if the SPID : 12 Checkpoint is taking time.
I can't kill it also.
Thanks

It was taking quite long therefore I have pasted here the comments and there was a activity for database restore was pending on that database due to which I have to restart the instance service.
If next time it will occur what should I do?
Nothing you cannot do anything reason being it is system process. I guess i said same thing in my comment before. Its just there because system is running checkpoint. I upfront cannot suggest what you should do but I have seen this on many prod databases and
it is normal. Dont restart SQL Server services if database is in middle of restore
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it
My Technet Wiki Article
MVP

Analytics function taking time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for