Another routing problem

I just replaced a FreeBSD box with Solaris 10 x86 U5.
I want my Windows boxes to reach internet thru Solaris. At the moment windows clients are able to ping both NICs on the Solaris. However, they can not ping default gateway of Solaris box. There is no problem on Solaris. I can reach internet without any problem.
Before posting, I used routeadm and (1) I enabled only ipv4-forwarding (did not work), (2) I enabled only ipv4-routing (did not work), (3) I enabled both ipv4-forwarding & ipv4-routing (did not help)
I also read about 5 pages of similar routing problems in forums. No clear solution is provided in any of them. I am posting this with the hope to find a solution.
Some information about my network is as follows:
bash-3.00# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
bge0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 192.168.2.2 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
ether 0:1c:c4:31:5:fd
e1000g0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 192.168.1.3 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 0:1b:21:15:15:29
bash-3.00#
bash-3.00# netstat -rn
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
default 192.168.2.1 UG 1 15658
192.168.1.0 192.168.1.3 U 1 177 e1000g0
192.168.2.0 192.168.2.2 U 1 8 bge0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 58 lo0
bash-3.00#
bash-3.00# routeadm
Configuration Current Current
Option Configuration System State
IPv4 routing disabled disabled
IPv6 routing disabled disabled
IPv4 forwarding disabled disabled
IPv6 forwarding disabled disabled
Routing services "route:default ripng:default"
Routing daemons:
STATE FMRI
disabled svc:/network/routing/legacy-routing:ipv4
disabled svc:/network/routing/legacy-routing:ipv6
disabled svc:/network/routing/ndp:default
disabled svc:/network/routing/zebra:quagga
disabled svc:/network/routing/rip:quagga
disabled svc:/network/routing/ripng:default
disabled svc:/network/routing/ripng:quagga
disabled svc:/network/routing/ospf:quagga
disabled svc:/network/routing/ospf6:quagga
disabled svc:/network/routing/bgp:quagga
disabled svc:/network/routing/rdisc:default
disabled svc:/network/routing/route:default
bash-3.00#
bash-3.00# ndd -get /dev/ip ip_forwarding
0
bash-3.00#

kucukoglu wrote:
I just replaced a FreeBSD box with Solaris 10 x86 U5.
I want my Windows boxes to reach internet thru Solaris. At the moment windows clients are able to ping both NICs on the Solaris. However, they can not ping default gateway of Solaris box. There is no problem on Solaris. I can reach internet without any problem.Does the outside world know how to route to the clients behind Solaris? I'll bet they do not.
If that's true, then routing/forwarding isn't useful. You'll have to set up the Solaris box as a NAT gateway instead. Ipfilter can do that. There are several cookbooks for it.
Before posting, I used routeadm and (1) I enabled only ipv4-forwarding (did not work), (2) I enabled only ipv4-routing (did not work), (3) I enabled both ipv4-forwarding & ipv4-routing (did not help)
I also read about 5 pages of similar routing problems in forums. No clear solution is provided in any of them. I am posting this with the hope to find a solution.Your solution is fine for outbound packets (the clients use Solaris as a gateway and then it forwards them on to the internet). But for the return packet, that's not possible. There's no route published.
Darren

Similar Messages

Yet another routing problem :/

I'm trying to setup something like this:
ADSL line
|
192.168.0.1 Netgear router
|
192.168.0.2 eth0 Arch box
192.168.1.1 eth1 /
|
192.168.1.2 Windows box
The rc.conf lines are:
MODULES=(dmfe 8139too uhci_hcd snd-via82xx snd-pcm-oss !usbserial !ide-scsi)
lo="lo 127.0.0.1"
eth0="eth0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255"
eth1="eth0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255"
INTERFACES=(lo eth0 eth1)
loopback="-host 127.0.0.1 lo"
gateway="default gw 192.168.0.1"
ROUTES=(gateway loopback)
After a network restart the ifconfig returns the following output:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:AD:01:13:0D
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::280:adff:fe01:130d/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:138 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:3124 (3.0 Kb) TX bytes:3240 (3.1 Kb)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xa400
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
What am I doing wrong here and how should I configure the arch box?
Thank you.

Oh boy... guess it's not a good idea to chill on a Sunday afternoon, having few beers and also tweaking Linux...
I have commited a typo which costed me about 1 hour of confusion.
Wrong setting:
eth1="eth0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255"
Good setting (after another beer):
eth1="eth1 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255"
:oops:
It's all smooth now.

Just another ANNOYING problem with internet

Hello everybody !
So here we go, I am another user that has problems viewing web pages. To make a long story short I would like to add that though I am not a system administrator by any means, I am an experienced user. So if I say for example "I did nothing but the program stoped working correctly" DOES realy mean that I did nothing at all (therefore it doesnt mean that I occasionaly pushed few buttons while viewing complex settings and then forgot about it).
PROBLEM : Sometimes (randomly) I am not able to view web pages. The problem may disappear suddenly, but otherwise I have to reboot computer to solve the problem (untill it happens again. And it WILL happen withing ~30min...4 hours, so several times a day)
I USE : Macbook air 2012 (i7 8gb if it does matter). MacOS 10.8.2.   Everything is up to date, I frequently check the system for updates.
WHAT HAVE I TRIED TO DO TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM :
1) I have changed the wireless channel so that nobody around uses the same one
2) I have changed router and internet provider (well I did not change them, I just use my mba at office, at home and somewhere else. Each place has its own router (d-link at work and apple airport express at home) and its own provider)
3) I have changed mtu (maximum transmission unit) to 1453 from 1500 by default (System preferences -> network -> advanced )
4) I have tried different public DNS servers
5) I did try to request DHCP once again when the problem appears
6) The last but not least - I have tried different browsers (safari, opera, firefox)
The only thing that works yet - reboot.
MY STUPID THOUGHTS ON THAT :
- This is not a router problem, because I have already tried about 4-5 different models, including D-link, Airport and Asus
- This is not an internet connection problem generaly (I am able to use skype, teamviewer etc. while the problem occurs)
- This is not a macbook problem, because if I boot Windows (via bootcamp), it seems like I do not face that problem at all
As a result : this is a MacOS problem, and I have to look for fix inside it.
SOME ADDITIONAL INFO :
It realy happens suddenly: I am browsing webpages, everything is ok. Then bum - and the next page starts to load SLOWLY. Few more pages load SLOWLY (if there are pictures, I find "?" instead of them). And then pages stop loading at some moment. If I try to refresh the page, it might help sometimes. But then, finaly, I just lose opportunity to load web pages by any means.
The problem may go away for some time, but it will return for sure. Rebooting every time is incomfortable for me, since I have a lot of stuff opened and rearranged between different spaces (desktops).
Thank you for your time in advance guys ! Hope some of you have already faced the problem and have found the solution.
Thank you for your time guys.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It won’t solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
Third-party system modifications are a common cause of usability problems. By a “system modification,” I mean software that affects the operation of other software — potentially for the worse. The following procedure will help identify which such modifications you've installed. Don’t be alarmed by the complexity of these instructions — they’re easy to carry out and won’t change anything on your Mac.
These steps are to be taken while booted in “normal” mode, not in safe mode. If you’re now running in safe mode, reboot as usual before continuing.
Below are instructions to enter some UNIX shell commands. The commands are harmless, but they must be entered exactly as given in order to work. If you have doubts about the safety of the procedure suggested here, search this site for other discussions in which it’s been followed without any report of ill effects.
Some of the commands will line-wrap or scroll in your browser, but each one is really just a single line, all of which must be selected. You can accomplish this easily by triple-clicking anywhere in the line. The whole line will highlight, and you can then either copy or drag it. The headings “Step 1” and so on are not part of the commands.
Note: If you have more than one user account, Step 2 must be taken as an administrator. Ordinarily that would be the user created automatically when you booted the system for the first time. The other steps should be taken as the user who has the problem, if different. Most personal Macs have only one user, and in that case this paragraph doesn’t apply.
Launch the Terminal application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Terminal in the icon grid.
When you launch Terminal, a text window will open with a line already in it, ending either in a dollar sign (“$”) or a percent sign (“%”). If you get the percent sign, enter “sh” and press return. You should then get a new line ending in a dollar sign.
Step 1
Copy or drag — do not type — the line below into the Terminal window, then press return:
kextstat -kl | awk '!/com\.apple/{printf "%s %s\n", $6, $7}'
Post the lines of output (if any) that appear below what you just entered (the text, please, not a screenshot.) You can omit the final line ending in “$”.
Step 2
Repeat with this line:
sudo launchctl list | sed 1d | awk '!/0x|com\.(apple|openssh|vix)|edu\.mit|org\.(amavis|apache|cups|isc|ntp|postfix|x)/{print $3}'
This time, you'll be prompted for your login password, which won't be displayed when you type it. You may get a one-time warning not to screw up. You don't need to post the warning.
Note: If you don’t have a login password, you’ll need to set one before taking this step. If that’s not possible, skip to the next step.
Step 3
launchctl list | sed 1d | awk '!/0x|com\.apple|edu\.mit|org\.(x|openbsd)/{print $3}'
Step 4
ls -1A /e*/mach* {,/}L*/{Ad,Compon,Ex,Fram,In,Keyb,La,Mail/Bu,P*P,Priv,Qu,Scripti,Servi,Spo,Sta}* L*/Fonts 2> /dev/null
Important: If you formerly synchronized with a MobileMe account, your me.com email address may appear in the output of the above command. If so, anonymize it before posting.
Step 5
osascript -e 'tell application "System Events" to get name of every login item' 2> /dev/null
Remember, steps 1-5 are all drag-and-drop or copy-and-paste, whichever you prefer — no typing, except your password. Also remember to post the output.
You can then quit Terminal.

Connecting to mass storage and printers on another router

I have my wireless router connected to another router that router is connected to the internet. My wireless connection works fine getting to the internet, but I am unable to see the other items connected to the first router. This would be my network printer and mass storage. What can I do?

Windows uses a protocol called SMB to connect to network shares. You will need to route ports 139, 445, and possibly 137 between the 2 networks. Unless you have a specific reason I would dump the non-wireless router. Having 2 routers is asking for problems and making your network overly complicated.

Mysterious routing problem / interface determination

Hi,
I have a very very strange routing problem with XI.
A message is sent from R/3 to XI and then send via adapter to an external party. The routing is configured well. But sometimes I have the following problem:
A message is received by XI (from R/3). The receiver is determinated. Although an interface determination and receiver agreement is configured, the trace shows "no interface determination fpr party xyz and service abc found". The very strange thing is that finally the receiver interface DELINS.DELFOR01 with namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages is set!!
Finally, the error message is "no receiver agreement found for "... DELINS.DELFOR01, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages", which is reasonable because this receiver interface has never ever been configured!
Any idea why the interface determination cannot be found and nevertheless a completely wrong receiver interface is set?
This error occurs just sometimes for certain partners, but not always with all messages for these partners!
Help appreciated!
Christopher

Hi,
all routing objects are 100% correct. Particularly the receiver service has definitely no DELINS.DELFOR01 interface, but nevertheless the Integration Runtime tries to send the message to this interface. Another strange thing is that in the trace there is the warning "no interface determination for party xxx and service xxx found".
By the way: The Receiver Determination was configured to terminate message processing when no receiver can be found.
CHRIS

WRT54GC Wireless router problem with iPod touch and Ipad

Hi
I have a WRT54GC wireless router and both my ipod touch and ipad can connect to the network. They can both use the internet for like one minute and then the internet becomes very slow, and dies. Network connections are lost and I'm getting messages like 'can't connect to itunes' or 'lost connection with youtube'. The wireless router works fine for the laptops in the house (all windows). In the house where I live in the week (closer to my school) there is another router and i don't have the problem over there, also no problem to connect to my schools wireless network... So I think it's a combination problem of apple products and that router. I've tried a lot, like resetting network configuration, updating firmware, changing from wpa to wep1,... Anyone an idea?
Thank you
Bert

oh and the connection to the router isn't lost.
Thank you

EA6300 - Cascading the Linksys router to another router (LAN-LAN) - Does not Bridge built in Wifi AP

Regarding:
http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?pid=80&vw=1&articleid=3733#
Cascading the Linksys router to another router (LAN-LAN)
The Bridge mode function on the EA6300 does not bridge the Wifi AP radio to the network.
The ethernet ports are bridged, and the router can see network devices and wifi devices connected to itand ping devices in both directions , but Wifi clients connecting to the unit running in bridge mode are not "bridged" to the network.
~
Using the built in webpage of the router, all devices can be pinged.
Ethernet RJ-45 devices plugged into it can ping the unit and pull up the units config webpage, but not ping wifi clients connected to it.
Wfii devices connected to its access point radio, can pull up the units config webpage, but not ping ethernet RJ-45 devices connected to it.
If there is a bridge, then the bridge is broken in half and not functional.
~
All devices are set with IPs on the same subnet, 192.168.2.x
~
I have a Netgear router in Bridge mode, and it works fine, connecting the wifi access point and RJ-45 ethernet clients together like it should be, so I know how Bridge mode... should work...
But it doesn't on this unit, it is not working completely out the factory door. It will bridge one Router to another via the RJ-45 ethernet ports, but its own AP radio is no longer bridged and connected (like when running in NAT
Note that doing cascading using NAT as described under "Cascading the Linksys router to another router (LAN-WAN)" works fine.

Hi,
There's no WLAN bridge feature on the new Linksys Smart Wifi routers. You might also like to check and review these articles about Bridge Mode:
Article ID: 24583 - Setting up your Linksys Wi-Fi or Smart Wi-Fi Router to Bridge Mode
Article ID: 25714 - Setting up your Linksys Smart Wi-Fi Router to Bridge Mode using your Linksys Smart Wi-Fi Account
Hope this helps!
If everyone needs to believe in something, I believe I'll have another beer..

Added another router to UC320 W network

We are currently using a UC320W for our router, phone system, and wireless. We are wanting to add a device for VPN connections. I was wanting to find out if we could disable the routing on the UC320 W and just have it on the lan and the wireless as an Access Point? Basically install another firewall or router in front of it to handle the routing, dhcp, dns, and vpn connections. Has anybody attempted this?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,

We've not found a way to disable the routing on the UC320. What we ended up doing was giving the UC320 its own public IP, then disable the DHCP/DNS options for it and place another router (a pfSense firewall) in parallel with it.

TV Guide fails - router problem?

When the guide failed on our main TV is the family room, I tried trouble-shooting it -- no luck. Then I "chatted" online with Verizon's "Raul" for two hours, trying everything he asked, including swapping the box with the one in the bedroom -- Raul thought it was the biox and gave me an 800 number to call to get a swap in boxes. However, before the weekend is over, all but one TV has the same problem. Right now, we get the guide on one TV and no guide on four TVs.
I've worked on this all day so far today. Verizon's In-Home Agent reports that none of the TVs have connectivity with the router. So I've concentrated on that, I've unplugged the router and the boxes, reset the router, accessed the router's control panel to see it seems to be working well. The only thing I can see wrong is this: The router's "WAN Ethernet" light stays dark, though its "WAN Coax" light stays lit. I wonder if this could be the problem; and, if so, how could I fix that?
One thing worries me about a router problem, though: Why would I still have the guide on one of the six TVs?
Anyone have a clue if I'm on the right track?
Thanks,
George

Yes, sounds like a router problem.
The STB has to download the program guide via the router. Each box should download 10 days worth of programing. So when the router goes out it could take as much as 10 days before the guide disappears. So the one box that still has the guide, was the last one to update and had more guide data stored than the others. It will go as well just given time.
If you have rebooted and reset the router, then the problem is either you have a bad router or possibly a bad splitter. Either way, you need to call tech support so they can get a tech out.
====================================================================================
Error exists between keyboard and chair.

Router problems how can I connect direct

I am continually having router problems from my service provider. How can i connect my printer directly to my computer? Thanks

Hi,
You need a printer which supports this first and then use the following instructions:
http://www8.hp.com/au/en/campaigns/wireless-printing-center/wireless-direct.html
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

A bridge? A switch? Another router?

I had a internet modem connected via ethernet cable to a Linksys router (the wireless ability had been deactivated) and then I ran from the Linksys one ethernet cable to one Apple Express (N) and another ethernet cable to another Apple Express (b/g for some G3 Macs). The internet stopped working so I plugged the modem directly into the N Apple Express. I guess I need to get rid of the Linksys. What should I get to replace it so I can run the N and the B/G Apple Expresses again? A bridge? A switch? Another router?
Thanks,
P.Hyland

When you plugged your Express devices into the Linksys router, did you first configure them to act as a "bridge"?. In other words, the Connection Sharing setting in AirPort Utility must be set to "Off (Bridge Mode).
You would need to do this for both Express devices as follows:
Open Hard Drive > Applications > Utilities > AirPort Utility
Click Manual Setup
Click the Internet icon at the top of the setup page
At the bottom of the next page, look for the setting for Connection Sharing. This must be set to "Off (Bridge Mode) whenever the device is plugged into a router.
Chances are, your Linkys is fine and the Express devices were not correctly configured to connect to the Linksys. If you connected the Expresses to your old Apple router (I'm assuming it has LAN ethernet ports as well), they will be configured the same way. So, whether you use the Linksys or the Apple, configure your Express devices as above.
So, your network will look like this:
Modem > Router > Express Devices > Computers can connect by wireless or they can connect by ethernet to the Router.

Possible to simultaneously use time capsule for backup + another router for internet?

I will soon be moving into an apartment in which my landlord provides wireless internet through her own router.
I also have my own Time Capsule, which I'd like to continue to use to back up my Mac via Time Machine.
Is it possible to connect to both my Time Capsule (for backup only) and another router (for internet only) at the same time?
If not, can anyone suggest a good workaround?

moskovit wrote:
I've done a little research, and it looks like I might be able to wirelessly daisy chain the two routers, using WDS (wireless distribution system), assuming my landlord's router supports it, but that this would drop the speed of the internet significantly: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2623802?start=0&tstart=0
It works extremely poorly and the landlord would need to agree to it.. plus it would require use of WEP security which is hackable by children with internet hack kits in about 2min flat. Don't go there. Apple have made their products incompatible with most other routers. So any suggestion of a workaround will involve spending some money on your part.
You could buy a airport express and plug that into the main router by ethernet.. again if allowed. Your TC can do wireless bridge to another apple product very well. Messy but could work. It is not that expensive to get a second hand AEBS and use that. You don't need the latest products but wireless range would be better in the AEBS than AE.
So I'm still wondering: Is there another workaround? Is there a way to get my mac to connect to my time capsule (for backup) and another router (for internet) simultaneously, or is that just technologically impossible? If it's impossible, is there another solution?
You cannot wirelessly connect to two different wireless devices at once on one client. You need to either have a second wireless client in the laptop.. for instance a USB stick which can be fairly tiny nowadays. It is just you need to find one with Mac drivers. Or the TC must have internet connectivity. You could get that by buying a wireless bridge, and using that in your room, with the TC plugged into it. Universal wireless bridge devices are fairly cheap, but can be a pain to setup. Look for products that work with the main router and use as fast a speed as possible. It can be a tricky setup as you need the wireless bridge working on one channel and the TC working on another. What I am suggesting is the WDS solution you found but using two different boxes to do it. And not using WDS at all, unless the main router is suitable, but rather universal bridge.
The hassle of all that suggests to me,, I would go for the wireless stick, so your Mac laptop has two wireless clients.
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/iMAC-MAC-Apple-Airport-G3-G4-G5-OS-X-USB-WIRELESS-CAR D-/290538112833?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item43a56bc741
I have no idea if this works just to show you what I mean. Please do research it yourself.
An ethernet connection to the TC is far superior solution albeit would require you to plug and unplug it.

On the continuing saga of third party router problems......

I got an Apple TV which works great with my wireless Airport WDS, but then I was looking into any problems people could be having with it and ran into this:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=901401&tstart=0
Check the third party router problems where Airports worked great.
Networking is ...networking, but you also get what you pay for.

Hi mgrant,
The information at the bottem of the article in in Keith_Beddoe's personal website may help. Link: Using your own router for Infinity
The MTU Size needs to be set as 1492
Cheers
jac_95 | BT.com Help Site | BT Service Status
Someone Solved Your Question?
Please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’
Try a Search
See if someone in the community had the same problem and how they got it resolved.

YAPP (Yet Another Printing Problem)

I've found another printing problem - this time with colour printing.
To my
surprise, Forte (3.0.E.0) can print in colour (at least on a HP 690C,
using
NT drivers for the 660C, the printer being connected to a Win95
machine).
I can print OK with from my NT develpoment machine in colour, but when
running
the same app from the Win95 client with the printer attached locally the
coloured text disappears. Has anyone else come across this problem?
Is this another of the 'Printing works fine as long as it happens
non-locally?'
features?
Thanks
Jamie Anstice
Programmer/Analyst, University of Canterbury
New Zealand

I can print OK with from my NT develpoment machine in colour, but when
running
the same app from the Win95 client with the printer attached locally the
coloured text disappears. Has anyone else come across this problem?Hi Jamie,
I wonder if this is related to the printing feature I discovered
where things I print from Forte have a strong tendency to come out in
the same colours as my windows desktop, which is
typically yellow-on-black.
- Ed
================================================================================
Eduard E Havelaar, Information Services Section, University of Canterbury
email: [email protected]
phone: +64-3-366 7001 extn 8910
fax: +64-3-364 2999
snailmail: Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

E2000 + WAG160N routing problem?

Hi all,
I have a new E2000 router with address 192.168.0.1 connected to a WAG160N Modem router with address 192.168.1.1
and several computers at each router. All have DHCP activated and wifi active and working.
The cascading connection between both devices seems working well only in one direction.
All seems ok as I can access to internet from any computer. Also, computers connected to E2000 have accces
to computers on WAG160N modem BUT computers connected at modem do NOT have access to computer at router.
In fact from a computer connected to the E2000 I can configure the web interface of the E2000 and also the WAG160N
but from a computers connected at WAG160N I have access only to this interface but not to the E2000 interface.
I don't know if could be a routing problem. Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Marti

The E2000 is configured to do NAT and thus protects the LAN from the internet side. If it was easily accessible your WAG LAN would be easily accessible from the internet.
You want to set up the E2000 as simple access point:
Unplug the E2000 from the WAG160N and open the web interface of the E2000 from a computer wired to the E2000.
On the main setup page
1. change the internet connection type to Automatic/DHCP (in case you have changed it).
2. change the LAN IP address from 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.1.2.
3. Disable the DHCP server.
4. Save settings.
Unplug the computer.
Now wire one of the numbered LAN ports of the E2000 to the WAG160N. Don't use the internet port on the E2000.
That's the best setup you can do with your two routers... The E2000 is only used as simple access point and ethernet switch.

Another routing problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for