ANSI SQL
I wanted to test some SQL to make sure it was SQL 92 compliant. My understanding is that the command I was using was compilant.
I set on the validator:
ALTER SESSION SET flagger=FULL;and issued the statement:
SELECT
COALESCE(
NULL, 34, 13, 0
from
dual;But I get the error:
ERROR at line 4:
ORA-00097: use of Oracle SQL feature not in SQL92 Full Level
ORA-06550: line 4, column 1:
PLS-01413: Use of NULL an expression
ORA-06550: line 3, column 1:
PLS-01416: Use of <id> (<value>...) hereSo I tried this:
SELECT
COALESCE(
'', 34, 13, 0
from
dual;But get:
ERROR at line 4:
ORA-00097: use of Oracle SQL feature not in SQL92 Full Level
ORA-06550: line 4, column 3:
PLS-01466: Null strings are not allowed
ORA-06550: line 3, column 1:
PLS-01416: Use of <id> (<value>...) hereAny ideas what I am doing wrong, please?
Thanks
Yep it does sound a little like a cop out.
SQL> alter session set flagger=full;
Session altered.
SQL> select coalesce(null,34,2) from dual;
select coalesce(null,34,2) from dual
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00097: use of Oracle SQL feature not in SQL92 Full Level
ORA-06550: line 2, column 17:
PLS-01413: Use of NULL an expression
ORA-06550: line 2, column 8:
PLS-01416: Use of <id> (<value>...) here
SQL> select coalesce(cast(null as number),34,2) from dual;
select coalesce(cast(null as number),34,2) from dual
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00097: use of Oracle SQL feature not in SQL92 Full Level
ORA-06550: line 2, column 22:
PLS-01413: Use of NULL an expression
ORA-06550: line 2, column 17:
PLS-01416: Use of <id> (<value>...) here
ORA-06550: line 2, column 8:
PLS-01416: Use of <id> (<value>...) here
SQL> select coalesce((select null from dual),34,2) from dual;
COALESCE((SELECTNULLFROMDUAL),34,2)
34
SQL>The embedded (select null from dual) still doesn't impart a datatype on the null
SQL> select dump((select null from dual)) from dual;
DUMP((SELECTNULLFROMDUAL))
NULL
SQL>So it can't be to do with data types. If it was then, as already mentioned, the CAST should fix the issue, although you could argue that CAST in itself is not SQL92 compliant so that's why you can't use that.
Hmmm.....
Similar Messages
-
Differences between ANSI SQL and Oracle 8/9
Hallo,
i'm looking for good online texts or books concerning the problem "Differences between ANSI SQL and different database implementations (ORACLE, Informix, MySQL...)" I want to check a program written in C (with ESQL) that works with an Informix-DB. In this code i want to find code that is specific to the Informix-DB. I want to change the database, so all the code should be independent from a DB. Does anybody know texts or books concerning this problem?
thx
Marco SeumBasically there is syntax difference between both of them.
Lets say i want to join two table EMP and DEPT based on DEPTNO.
With Oracle SQL format its like this.
select e.*
from emp e, dept d
where e.deptno = d.deptnoHere the joining condition goes in the WHERE clause.
With ANSI SQL format its like this.
select e.*
from emp e
join dept d
on e.deptno = d.deptnoHere the join condition is mentioned separately and not in WHERE clause.
Oracle supports ANSI SQL starting from 9i version.
You can read more about the syntax difference Here -
ANSI SQL 92 SYNTAX OUTER JOIN PERFORMANCE ISSUE
Good Morning
Could anyone explain why the excution time for these two (ment to be identical)
queries run so differently.
oracle syntax execution time 1.06 seconds
select COUNT(*) from
PL_EVENT_VIEW pev,
PL_EVENT_STAFF_VIEW pesv
WHERE pev.EVENT_ID=PESV.EVENT_ID(+)
AND pev.WEEKS=PESV.WEEK_NUM(+)
AND pev.event_id=2520
ansi sql 92 syntax execution time 7.05 seconds
select COUNT(*) from
PL_EVENT_VIEW pev
LEFT JOIN PL_EVENT_STAFF_VIEW pesv
ON (pev.EVENT_ID=PESV.EVENT_ID
AND pev.WEEKS=PESV.WEEK_NUM)
WHERE pev.event_id=2520
Thanks
David HillsBTW Oracle outer join operator (+) and ANSI SQL OUTER JOIN syntax are NOT equivalent. Consider following:
DROP TABLE T1;
CREATE TABLE T1 (C1 NUMBER);
DROP TABLE T2;
CREATE TABLE T2 (C2 NUMBER);
DROP TABLE T3;
CREATE TABLE T3 (C3 NUMBER);
-- Following SELECT works:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM T1, T2, T3
WHERE C2 = C1
AND C3(+) = C1
COUNT(*)
0
-- But:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM T1, T2, T3
WHERE C2 = C1
AND C3(+) = C1
AND C3(+) = C2
AND C3(+) = C1
ERROR at line 4:
ORA-01417: a table may be outer joined to at most one other table
-- However with ANSI syntax:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM T1
JOIN T2 ON (C2 = C1)
LEFT JOIN T3 ON (C3 = C1 AND C3 = C2)
COUNT(*)
0 -
What is Difference between ANSI SQL and ORACLE SQL
Hi,
I am going to take the assesment test for ANSI SQL Programming before that i want to know any difference between ANSI SQL and ORACLE SQL?
I am studying for SQL but the test will be ANSI SQL please let me give an idea about the both.
Thanks
Merina RoslinBasically there is syntax difference between both of them.
Lets say i want to join two table EMP and DEPT based on DEPTNO.
With Oracle SQL format its like this.
select e.*
from emp e, dept d
where e.deptno = d.deptnoHere the joining condition goes in the WHERE clause.
With ANSI SQL format its like this.
select e.*
from emp e
join dept d
on e.deptno = d.deptnoHere the join condition is mentioned separately and not in WHERE clause.
Oracle supports ANSI SQL starting from 9i version.
You can read more about the syntax difference Here -
ANSI SQL Syntax - What belongs to join-clause and what to where-clause
Hello,
we currently have a discussion about the ANSI SQL Syntax where we do not agree what belongs to the join clause and what belongs to the where clause in an ANSI Sytnax SQL Query.
Lets say there is a query like this:
+SELECT *+
FROM employees emp, departments dept
WHERE emp.dept_country = dept.dept_country
AND emp.dept_name = dept.dept_name
AND dept.dept_type = 'HQ'
AND emp.emp_lastname = 'Smith'
Primary key of the departments table is on the columns dept_country, dept_name and dept_type. We have a Oracle database 10g.
Now I have rewritten the query to Ansi Syntax:
+SELECT *+
FROM employees emp
JOIN departments dept
ON emp.dept_country = dept.dept_country AND emp.dept_name = dept.dept_name
WHERE dept.dept_type = 'HQ'
AND emp.emp_lastname = 'Smith'
Another developer says that this is not completely correct, every filter on a column that belongs to the primary-key of the joined table has to be in the join clause, like this:
+SELECT *+
FROM employees emp
JOIN departments dept
+ON emp.dept_country = dept.dept_country AND emp.dept_name = dept.dept_name AND dept.dept_type = 'HQ'
WHERE emp.emp_lastname = 'Smith'
Can somebody tell me which on is correct?
Is there any definition for that? I couldn't find it in the Oracle Database definition.
I just found out the names of the ANSI documents here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/ap_standard_sql001.htm#i11939
I had a look at the ANSI webstore but there you have to buy the PDF files. In my case thats exaggerated because both of the Queries work and i am just interessted if there is one correct way.
Thank you in advance
MarcoHi,
As i guideline i would say, answer the question: should the result of the join be filtered or should only filtered rows be joined from a particular table?
This is helpful in the case of outer joins also, for inner joins it doesnt matters as said already be former posters, where there may be hughe semantical differences depending of where the predicates are placed.
From performance view, if we talk about oracle, take a look a the execution plans. You will see that there is (probably) no difference in case of inner joins. Even in case of outer joins the optimizer pushes the predicate as a filter towards the table if it semantically possible.
Regards -
Hi
How to use ANSI SQL JOINS (9i) for below query
SELECT EMP.EMPNO,EMP_T.TNO,EMP_T.SAL1 FROM EMP,EMP_T WHERE EMP.EMPNO=EMP_T.TNO
UNION ALL
SELECT EMP.EMPNO,EMP_T.TNO,EMP_T.SAL2 FROM EMP,EMP_T WHERE EMP.EMPNO=EMP_T.TNO
UNION ALL
SELECT EMP.EMPNO,EMP_T.TNO,EMP_T.SAL3 FROM EMP,EMP_T WHERE EMP.EMPNO=EMP_T.TNO
EMPNO TNO SAL1
7369 7369 100
7499 7499 1000
7566 7566 400
7782 7782 4000
7369 7369 200
7499 7499 2000
7566 7566 500
7782 7782 5000
7369 7369 300
7499 7499 3000
7566 7566 600
EMPNO TNO SAL1
7782 7782 6000
Regards
MMSELECT EMP.EMPNO,
EMP_T.TNO,
EMP_T.SAL1
FROM EMP
JOIN EMP_T ON ( EMP.EMPNO = EMP_T.TNO )
UNION ALL
SELECT EMP.EMPNO,
EMP_T.TNO,
EMP_T.SAL2
FROM EMP
JOIN EMP_T ON ( EMP.EMPNO = EMP_T.TNO )
UNION ALL
SELECT EMP.EMPNO,
EMP_T.TNO,
EMP_T.SAL3
FROM EMP
JOIN EMP_T ON ( EMP.EMPNO = EMP_T.TNO ) -
OWB 10.2.0.4 ANSI SQL join problem
Hi
Its seams to me, that in OWB 10.2.0.4 there is something broken with ANSI SQL joins and instead of ANSI joins there is used oracle SQL joins only. Maybe someone can point some solutions? I can’t rewrite all mappings with union and other operators. And manually pl/sql editing also would be big problem."Am I correct in assuming you did not code ANSI joins?" -> yes, i am coding Oracle SQL joins and with this option just generating ANSI joins.
With ANSI SQL join you can use OR and IN operands (and code looks more readable).
It is question of performance (so for example 80% of dataset you can join by one column other 15% by second etc ..). So this all can be rewritten also in Split->join->union all, but if you have several such joins, this will be painfully. -
hi..
i'm new for oracle ..
i hav one doubt .. what is the difference between normal join and iso/ansi sql-99 joins...
is any advantage ..
query e.g:
SELECT c.course_name, c.period, e.student_name
FROM course c, enrollment e
WHERE c.course_name = e.course_name(+)
AND c.period = e.period(+);
sql-99 format :
SELECT c.course_name, c.period, e.student_name
FROM enrollment e RIGHT OUTER JOIN course c
ON c.course_name = e.course_name
AND c.period = e.period;Hi
-It is analogous to joining a table, and avoiding the "where" clause
-It allows easier product migration and a reduced learning curve when cross-training
-there is no performance increase compared to the existing syntax.
I hope u got it
Khurram Siddiqui
[email protected] -
Hi all,
I have a simple query
SELECT A.*, B.Dstrct_Code FROM MSF601 A, MSF600 B
WHERE ALTERNATE_REF LIKE 'PF%'
AND A.alt_ref_code = B.Equip_No
AND B.Dstrct_Code = 'ACME';
which works fine, but I want to convert it to ANSI
SQL syntax, so I tried
SELECT A.*, B.Dstrct_Code FROM MSF601 A, MSF600 B
WHERE ALTERNATE_REF LIKE 'PF%'
INNER JOIN ON A.alt_ref_code = B.Equip_No
AND B.Dstrct_Code = 'ACME';
but I get
ERROR at line 3:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
Could some kind soul explain why?
Paul...An example that looks a lot like your example:
SQL> select dept.*
2 , emp.ename
3 from dept, emp
4 where dept.dname like '%A%'
5 inner join on dept.deptno = emp.deptno
6 and emp.sal > 1000
7 /
inner join on dept.deptno = emp.deptno
FOUT in regel 5:
.ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
SQL> select dept.*
2 , emp.ename
3 from dept
4 inner join emp on dept.deptno = emp.deptno
5 where dept.dname like '%A%'
6 and emp.sal > 1000
7 /
DEPTNO DNAME LOC ENAME
30 SALES CHICAGO ALLEN
30 SALES CHICAGO WARD
20 RESEARCH DALLAS JONES
30 SALES CHICAGO MARTIN
30 SALES CHICAGO BLAKE
10 ACCOUNTING NEW YORK CLARK
20 RESEARCH DALLAS SCOTT
10 ACCOUNTING NEW YORK KING
30 SALES CHICAGO TURNER
20 RESEARCH DALLAS ADAMS
20 RESEARCH DALLAS FORD
10 ACCOUNTING NEW YORK MILLER
12 rijen zijn geselecteerd.Regards,
Rob. -
Generate ANSI SQL with Oracle IKM
Is it possible for ODI to generate ANSI SQL with the Oracle IKM?
I have used ANSI joins in a filter in an interface, now when I run the interface I get the error: ORA-25156: old style outer join (+) cannot be used with ANSI joins.
I would prefer to use ANSI joins in my filters instead of the old style (+) syntax. Is this possible?Sure,
Go to topology, edit your Oracle technology , on SQL tab change it over to ordered joins - clause location - From , you can specify the keywords left join, right join, full outer join etc to get rid of your '(+)' -
Ansi SQL for "select ... for update nowait"
Hi, All,
I have a sql
select ... for update nowait
My boss wants it to be ANSI compliant.
I am not familiar with ANSI SQL.
What should be the syntax in Ansi?
Thanks a lot!I resent having the lowest salary :-)Sorry John, it's probably due to the exchange rate of sterling against the canuck dollar right now.
SQL> select empno, ename, sal, job, mgr from emp;
EMPNO ENAME SAL JOB MGR
7369 SPENCER 800 CLERK 7902
7499 VERREYNNE 1600 SALESMAN 7698
7521 VAN WIJK 1250 SALESMAN 7698
7566 MAINGUY 2975 MANAGER 7839
7654 KISHORE 1250 SALESMAN 7698
7698 BARRY 2850 MANAGER 7839
7782 BOEHMER 2695 MANAGER 7839
7788 PADFIELD 3000 ANALYST 7566
7839 SCHNEIDER 5500 PRESIDENT
7844 GASPAROTTO 1500 SALESMAN 7698
7876 CAVE 1100 CLERK 7788
7900 CLARKE 950 CLERK 7698
7902 JAFFAR 3000 ANALYST 7566
7934 ROBERTSON 1430 CLERK 7782
14 rows selected.
SQL> Cheers, APC -
Hey,
one of my colleagues managed to create a SQL-statement (in ansi-sql-syntax) that just blocks the session and gives no response at all.
When I rewrote the statement, it gave results within a second.
It's not quite possible to provide a sample-case, but maybe someone here has an idea why the first statement doesn't work, and the second does?
First:
====
SELECT c.CONTRACTID as ENTITEITID,
v.VASTSTELLINGCODE,
'' as INFO,
v.CAMPAGNE
FROM NFD_CONTRACT c
INNER JOIN NFD_OVK o ON o.OVKID = c.OVKID
INNER JOIN NFD_VSTDEFCMP v ON v.VASTSTELLINGCODE = 'C77' AND v.CLASSIFICATIECODE = o.CLASSIFICATIECODE AND v.CAMPAGNE = o.CAMPAGNE
AND Nfd_Vaststellingen_Pck.NFD_IS_DATUM_VST_VALID('C77',o.CAMPAGNE,'Contract',o.CLASSIFICATIECODE) = 1
INNER JOIN NFD_BETROKKENPSN_CON psn ON c.CONTRACTID = psn.CONTRACTID
INNER JOIN (SELECT a.aangifteid, a.psn_nmr, a.psnrolid, a.oogstjaar,
case when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA04_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA05_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA06_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
else 0
end AS OA_Heeft_E
FROM NFD_AANGIFTE a
WHERE AANGIFTETYPE = 'Oogstaangifte') vst ON psn.PSN_NMR = vst.PSN_NMR AND psn.PSNROLID = vst.PSNROLID
AND o.CAMPAGNE = vst.OOGSTJAAR AND vst.OA_Heeft_E = 1
Second:
======
SELECT c.CONTRACTID as ENTITEITID,
v.VASTSTELLINGCODE,
'' as INFO,
v.CAMPAGNE
FROM NFD_CONTRACT c
,nfd_ovk o
,nfd_vstdefcmp v
,nfd_betrokkenpsn_con psn
,(SELECT a.aangifteid, a.psn_nmr, a.psnrolid, a.oogstjaar,
case when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA04_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA04M_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA04S_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA05_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
when exists (SELECT ENTITEITID FROM NFD_VST_OA06_V vst WHERE a.AANGIFTEID = vst.ENTITEITID) then 1
else 0
end AS OA_Heeft_E
FROM NFD_AANGIFTE a
WHERE AANGIFTETYPE = 'Oogstaangifte') vst
WHERE o.OVKID = c.OVKID
AND v.VASTSTELLINGCODE = 'C77' AND v.CLASSIFICATIECODE = o.CLASSIFICATIECODE AND v.CAMPAGNE = o.CAMPAGNE
AND Nfd_Vaststellingen_Pck.NFD_IS_DATUM_VST_VALID('C77',o.CAMPAGNE,'Contract',o.CLASSIFICATIECODE) = 1
AND c.CONTRACTID = psn.CONTRACTID
AND psn.PSN_NMR = vst.PSN_NMR AND psn.PSNROLID = vst.PSNROLID
AND o.CAMPAGNE = vst.OOGSTJAAR AND vst.OA_Heeft_E = 1hey riedelmie,
off course the second statement is different.
I rewrote the query so the inner joins are being replaced by where-clauses with the table-names all in the from-clause.
In the second statement there are two extra when-clauses but they should also be in the first statement (the problem is still there, so data could indeed be different, but the problem is the same)
Tnx.
Greetings,
Dave
Message was edited by:
geysemansdave
added text about the when-clauses -
Hi All,
A slighly more complex connect by problem (that can be done with ANSI SQL-99) looking for an oracle matching output.
Input Data: (Small example subset)
RootID | Parent_ID | FreeText
0 | 0 |
444 | 555 | ABC1
555 | 666 | DEF2
666 | 777 | GHI3
888 | 0 | JKL4
Output Wanted: (Small example subset)
RootID ParentID FreeText LEVEL (Nesting)
444 | 555 | | 1
444 | 666 | ABC1 | 2
444 | 777 | DEF2-ABC1 | 3
444 | 888 | GHI3-DEF2-ABC1 | 4
444 | 0 | JKL4-GHI3-DEF2-ABC1 | 5
Can be easily enough done with ANSI-99 SYNTAX (Not supported in Oracle using a recursive CTE)
Target platform Oracle 9i
ANSI-SQL 99 Syntax: (Not Supported on Oracle - but demonstrates the ANSI-SQL 99 compliant way of doing this)
;WITH Recurse(RootId, ParentID, FreeText, Level) AS
(SELECT td.RootID, td.ParentID, '' as FreeText, 1 as Level
from TEST_DATA td
where rootid = 444
union all
select Recurse.RootID, td2.ParentId, td2.freetext + '-' + recurse.freetext, recurse.level+1 as level
from TEST_DATA td2
select * from Recurse;
The problem: is to generating the freetext component correctly with oracle.
Can generate the freetext component the wrong way round using SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH.
select connect_by_root(td.RootID), td.ParentID,
CASE when level = 1 then ''
ELSE
SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(td.freetext, '-')
END as FreeText, level
from test_data td
connect by td.RootID = prior td.ParentID
which gives:
RootID ParentID FreeText LEVEL (Nesting)
444 | 555 | | 1
444 | 666 | ABC1 | 2
444 | 777 | ABC1-DEF2 | 3
444 | 888 | ABC1-DEF2-GHI3 | 4
444 | 0 | ABC1-DEF2-GHI3-JKL4 | 5
The problem is the freetext component is the wrong way round (the root node information always comes first).
Tried looking at running something like:
select connect_by_root(td.RootID), td.ParentID,
CASE when level = 1 then ''
ELSE
td.freetext || '-' || FreeText2
END as FreeText2, level
from test_data td
connect by td.RootID = prior td.ParentID
--> but unfortunatly the aliasing of the column cannot be used to perform this operation [cannot reference the aliased column FreeText2].
Is there a sys_connect_by_path_node? (The opposite of sys_connect_by_path)
Returns the path of a column value from node to root,
with column values separated by char for each row returned by CONNECT BY condition
Or another way to get to the output required?
Best Regards,
DNot directly but there is a fairly common workaround using the undocumented REVERSE function.
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL> SELECT SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (ename, '/') enames,
2 REVERSE (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (REVERSE (ename), '/')) reverse_enames
3 FROM emps
4 START WITH mgr IS NULL
5 CONNECT BY PRIOR empno = mgr;
ENAMES REVERSE_ENAMES
/KING KING/
/KING/JONES JONES/KING/
/KING/JONES/SCOTT SCOTT/JONES/KING/
/KING/JONES/SCOTT/ADAMS ADAMS/SCOTT/JONES/KING/
/KING/JONES/FORD FORD/JONES/KING/
/KING/JONES/FORD/SMITH SMITH/FORD/JONES/KING/
/KING/BLAKE BLAKE/KING/
/KING/BLAKE/ALLEN ALLEN/BLAKE/KING/
/KING/BLAKE/WARD WARD/BLAKE/KING/
/KING/BLAKE/MARTIN MARTIN/BLAKE/KING/
/KING/BLAKE/TURNER TURNER/BLAKE/KING/
/KING/BLAKE/JAMES JAMES/BLAKE/KING/
/KING/CLARK CLARK/KING/
/KING/CLARK/MILLER MILLER/CLARK/KING/
14 rows selected.
SQL> -
Help on - convert ansi sql to oracle sql
hi gurus,
i'm try'g to convert ansi sql to oracle sql.
but i'm getting an error. can u please let me know, if i can convert it or is it better to use ansi sql!
original code in ansi format::
select distinct bfc.NBR_SEQ, bfc.IDN_ENTITY, bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY, n.CDE_STATUS,
gec.idn_group as idn_parent_id, bfc.IDN_FUNC_BUSS,
case when bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY = 'P' OR bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY = 'A' then
PKG_FW_NVGTR.GET_NAM_PAGE(bfc.IDN_ENTITY)
else
PKG_FW_NVGTR.GET_NAM_GROUP(bfc.IDN_ENTITY)
end as ENTITY_NAM,
p.Category, p.Display_Txt, p.show_in_nav, p.page_uri
from
T_BUSS_FUNC_ENTITY_CREF bfc
inner join t_buss_func bf on bfc.idn_func_buss = bf.idn_func_buss
inner join t_entity_prog_cref epc on bfc.idn_entity = epc.idn_entity and bfc.cde_type_entity = epc.cde_type_entity
left outer join t_page p on bfc.idn_entity = p.idn_page
left outer join t_group_entity_cref gec on bfc.idn_entity = gec.idn_entity and bfc.cde_type_entity = gec.cde_type_entity
left outer join t_nvgtr n on bfc.idn_entity = n.idn_entity and bfc.cde_type_entity = n.cde_type_entity
where
BF.nam_func_buss = 'CP' AND--P_NAM_FUNC_BUSS and
epc.cde_program in
( select p.cde_program from t_program p where p.nam_program in (
SELECT * FROM TABLE (CAST(PKG_FW_NVGTR.FN_GET_ARRAY_FROM_COMMA_LIST('LC', ',') AS TYP_ARRAY))))
order by
bfc.NBR_SEQ;tried to convert into oracle
SELECT DISTINCT bfc.NBR_SEQ,
bfc.IDN_ENTITY,
bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY,
n.CDE_STATUS,
gec.idn_group as idn_parent_id,
bfc.IDN_FUNC_BUSS,
case when bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY = 'P' OR bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY = 'A' then
PKG_FW_NVGTR.GET_NAM_PAGE(bfc.IDN_ENTITY)
else
PKG_FW_NVGTR.GET_NAM_GROUP(bfc.IDN_ENTITY)
end as ENTITY_NAM,
p.Category,
p.Display_Txt,
p.show_in_nav,
p.page_uri
FROM T_BUSS_FUNC_ENTITY_CREF bfc,
T_BUSS_FUNC bf,
T_ENTITY_PROG_CREF epc,
T_PAGE p,
T_GROUP_ENTITY_CREF gec,
T_NVGTR n
WHERE bfc.IDN_FUNC_BUSS = bf.IDN_FUNC_BUSS
AND bfc.IDN_ENTITY = epc.IDN_ENTITY
AND bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY = epc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY
AND bfc.IDN_ENTITY(+) = p.IDN_PAGE
AND bfc.IDN_ENTITY(+) = gec.IDN_ENTITY
AND bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY(+) = gec.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY
AND bfc.IDN_ENTITY(+) = n.IDN_ENTITY
AND bfc.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY(+) = n.CDE_TYPE_ENTITY
AND BF.nam_func_buss = 'CP' AND--P_NAM_FUNC_BUSS and
epc.cde_program in
( select p.cde_program from t_program p where p.nam_program in (
SELECT * FROM TABLE (CAST(PKG_FW_NVGTR.FN_GET_ARRAY_FROM_COMMA_LIST('LC', ',') AS TYP_ARRAY))))
order by
bfc.NBR_SEQ;error is
ORA-01417: a table may be outer joined to at most one other tableso how can i convert it?
thanksuser642856 wrote:
explain plan for this select statement
ID PID Operation Name Rows Bytes Cost CPU Cost IO Cost Temp space IN-OUT PQ Dist PStart PStop
0 SELECT STATEMENT 10M 1183M 570694 33G 567917
1 0 SORT UNIQUE 10M 1183M 287940 17G 286502 2607M
2 1 HASH JOIN 10M 1216M 179 1G 84
3 2 COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH PKG_FW_NVGTR.FN_GET_ARRAY_FROM_COMMA_LIST
4 2 HASH JOIN OUTER 2693 299K 58 34M 55
5 4 HASH JOIN OUTER 37 3959 11 24M 9
6 5 HASH JOIN OUTER 37 3663 10 18M 8
7 6 HASH JOIN 37 1147 7 12M 6
8 7 HASH JOIN 59 1180 5 6060823 4
9 8 NESTED LOOPS 2 24 3 15843 3
10 9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T_BUSS_FUNC 1 6 1 8341 1
11 10 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN UK_NAM_FUNC_BUSS 1 0 1050 0
12 9 TABLE ACCESS FULL T_PROGRAM 2 12 2 7501 2
13 8 INDEX FULL SCAN PK_T_ENTITY_PROG_CREF 59 472 1 18921 1
14 7 TABLE ACCESS FULL T_BUSS_FUNC_ENTITY_CREF 37 407 2 14891 2
15 6 TABLE ACCESS FULL T_PAGE 26 1768 2 14141 2
16 5 INDEX FULL SCAN UK_UNIQUE_GROUP_DEPENDENT 26 208 1 12321 1
17 4 TABLE ACCESS FULL T_NVGTR 6986 47K 46 3179613 46 as you can see.. cpu cost is in 33G..
is there any better way?
thanksCan you run this in a session please:
ALTER SESSION set optimizer_dynamic_sampling = 4;Then run an explain plan again.
And you have a function in there - PKG_FW_NVGTR.FN_GET_ARRAY_FROM_COMMA_LIST - which isn't helping things. -
Converting oracle join to Ansi sql join
Hi Guys,
I am new to SQL and trying to convert the following Oracle query (joins) into ANSI sql joins...Can someone please help me?
SELECT M.EXTERNALCODE, M.NAME AS MNAME, SC.BIRIM, SM.TRANSACTIONDATE, SMD.AMOUNT,
SMD.UNITPRICE, SM.ID AS SMID, SMD.ID AS SMDID, F.NAME AS FNAME,
IFNULL (SMD.AMOUNT, 0, SMD.AMOUNT) * IFNULL (SMD.UNITPRICE, 0, SMD.UNITPRICE) AS TOTALPRICE, SMD.AMOUNT AS RECEIVED_QUANTITY,
PD.ORDERID, PD.AMOUNT QUANTITY, PO.PROCESSDATE
FROM STOCKMAINTRANSACTION SM,
STOCKMAINTRANSACTIONDETAIL SMD,
MATERIAL M,
STOCKCARD SC,
FVSTOCK FVS,
FIRM F,
PURCHASEORDER PO,
PURCHASEORDERDETAIL PD,
PURCHASEORDERDETAILSUPPLIED PDS
WHERE SM.ID = SMD.MAINTRANSACTIONID
AND SMD.MATERIALID = M.ID
AND SMD.STOCKCARDID = SC.ID
AND SM.PROPREF = FVS.RECORDID(+)
AND FVS.FIELDID(+) = 2559
AND FVS.FLEVEL(+) = 'F'
AND F.ID(+) = SUBSTR (FVS.FVALUE, 1, 9)
AND SM.TRANSDEFID in (999,2329,2344,2370,150000903,150005362)
AND SMD.CANCELLED = 0
AND SMD.STOCKUPDATED = 1
AND SMD.ID = PDS.STOCKMAINTRANSACTIONDETAILID
AND PDS.ORDERDETAILID = PD.ORDERDETAILID
AND PO.ORDERID = PD.ORDERID
AND (M.ID = {@MATERIALID@} OR {@MATERIALID@} = 0)
AND (SM.STOREID = {@STOREID@} OR {@STOREID@} = 0)
AND (F.ID = {@SUPPLIERID@} OR {@SUPPLIERID@} = 0)
AND SM.TRANSACTIONDATE BETWEEN {@STARTDATE@} AND {@ENDDATE@}
ORDER BY F.NAME, M.EXTERNALCODE, SM.TRANSACTIONDATE
Really appreciate the help!
Thanks.Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
To convert to ANSI syntax, replace join conditions in the WHERE clause
FROM x
, y
WHERE x.x1 = y.y1
AND x.x2 = y.y2with ON conditions in the FROM clause:
FROM x
JOIN y ON x.x1 = y.y1
AND x.x2 = y.y2In inner joins, conditions that do not reference 2 tables are not really join conditions, so it doesn't matter if they are in the FROM clause or in the WHERE clause.
In your case
SM.TRANSDEFID in (999,2329,2344,2370,150000903,150005362)could be part of a join condition involving sm, or it could be in the WHERE clause. Most people find it clearer if 1-table conditions like this are in the WHERE clause.
Again, this only applies to inner joins. For outer joins, all conditions that apply to a table that may lack matching rows must be included in the FROM clause, like this:
LEFT OUTER JOIN fvstock fvs ON sm.propref = fvs.recordid
AND fvs.fieldid = 2559
AND fvs.flevel = 'F'Try it.
If you have trouble, post your best attempt, along with CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for a little sample data from all the tables involved, and the results you want from that data. Simplify the problem. Post only the tables and columns that you don't know how to handle.
See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}
user8428528 wrote:
AND (M.ID = {@MATERIALID@} OR {@MATERIALID@} = 0)
AND (SM.STOREID = {@STOREID@} OR {@STOREID@} = 0)
AND (F.ID = {@SUPPLIERID@} OR {@SUPPLIERID@} = 0)
AND SM.TRANSACTIONDATE BETWEEN {@STARTDATE@} AND {@ENDDATE@}This is not valid Oracle SQL. Is {@MATERIALID@} some kind of variable? -
ANSI SQL to Oracle Old SQL conversion
I need help to convert this ANSI SQL Query to Oracle Old school (With inline views and =(+) joins and where clasuses)
CUrrent Query and new one should return same resultset
---------------------------------Query Start----------------------------------------------------
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
SELECT
'XXXXXX' as Big_Boss,
da.Direct,
da.Director,
da.Manager,
da.SubArea,
da.Project,
da.Project_Name,
da.Project_Class,
da.HISL,
da.Resource_Name,
da.Resource_Status,
da.mon,
to_char(sysdate, 'dd-Mon-YYYY') AS "Current_Date",
DECODE(da.Project, NULL, 0, round(da.Slice / da.month_total, 2)) as
"Approved_Demand",
SUM(da.Availability) as "Headcount"
FROM
SELECT
w.level4_name AS Direct,
w.level5_name AS Director,
w.level6_name AS Manager,
w.level7_name AS SubArea,
INV.Code as Project,
inv.name as Project_Name,
det.hum_project_gate as Project_Class,
r.id AS HISL,
r.full_name as Resource_Name,
lookup.lookup_code as Resource_Status,
alc.slice AS Slice,
alc.slice_date as Mon,
avl.slice AS month_total,
alc.slice / avl.slice as FTE,
count(distinct r.id) AS Availability
FROM
nbi_dim_obs w,
prj_blb_slices_m_avl avl,
prj_obs_units obs,
cmn_lookups lookup,
srm_resources r
************** Section to be Converted ***************************----------
----------------------------Start----------------------------------------------------
left outer join(prj_resources t inner join srm_resources res on
t.prprimaryroleid = res.id) on r.id = t.prid
left outer join(prj_blb_slices_m_alc alc
left outer join(prteam tm
inner join(inv_investments INV inner join odf_ca_project det on det.id = inv.id
and det.hum_project_gate = 'approved_for_development') on tm.prprojectid = INV.ID
and INV.Is_Active = 1) on alc.prj_object_id = tm.prid
and alc.investment_id = inv.id) on alc.resource_id = t.prid
--------------------------------------End--------------------------------------------
-- inner join prj_blb_slices_m_avl avl on alc.resource_id = avl.prj_object_id
-- inner join prj_obs_units obs on res.unique_name = obs.unique_name
-- inner join nbi_dim_obs w on w.level7_unit_id = obs.id
WHERE
w.obs_type_name = 'Workgroup'
AND alc.slice > 0
AND alc.slice_date = avl.slice_date
AND r.is_active = 1
AND r.person_type = lookup.id
AND w.level7_unit_id = obs.id
AND alc.resource_id = avl.prj_object_id
AND res.unique_name = obs.unique_name
GROUP BY
w.level4_name
, w.level5_name
, w.level6_name
, w.level7_name
, r.id
, r.full_name
, lookup.lookup_code
, inv.code
, inv.NAME
, det.hum_project_gate
, alc.slice_date
, alc.slice
, avl.slice
) DA
GROUP BY
da.direct
, da.director
, da.manager
, da.subarea
, da.project_class
, da.hisl
, da.resource_name
, da.resource_status
, da.project
, da.Project_Name
, da.mon
, da.availability
, da.slice
, da.month_total
ORDER BY
da.direct
, da.director
, da.manager
, da.subarea
-------------------------------Query End----------------------------------------------------------Joins are joins ... what do you mean by "nested" joins?
If you are concerned about outer joins that can be performed using ANSI syntax that are not supported in the classic Oracle syntax then use in-line view and outer join the views.
If your code was properly formatted it would be possible for someone to read it and possibly see what you are seeing.
Read the FAQ page and learn to format your posted code.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Need guidance on statspack report
Hello Friends, How are you. I hope you all will be fine.I need guidance on statspack report. I do not know how can i resolve wait events. Please help me and give me some time for considering statspack report. If any one willing to do my help its real
-
I a using Crystal Reports XI. I have a text file that I want to use as a datasource. It keeps asking me for a user name and password. There isn't one assigned to it. I am very new at Crystal so I am lost. Please help?
-
SAP EHP5 MSCS installation with IBM DB2 9.7 on windows 2008 R2
Dear Sir i am installing SAP EHP5 high availability with IBM DB2 9.7 on windows 2008 R2 first cluster node installation is completed, now i am going to install database instance, before that i am configuring the database for MSCS as per installation
-
Error in Leave Request:ESS
Hi All, I am getting a error in Leave Request Iview in ESS application. I am using EP 7.0. I have done the required settings in R/3.Created Rule group,added applciation parameter in iview,JCos are working. But still I am getting this error. If anybod
-
[Solved] Acpi handler not triggering power button action
I'm editing the acpi handler.sh script to react to my power button, here is a relevant snippet from the code: #!/bin/sh set $* logger "$1 $2" case "$1" in button/power) logger "$1 $2" case "$2" in PWRF) logger "$1 $2" logger "ACPI action undefined: $