Any possiblity to use single Inbound Service Interface with multiple Receiver Agreements

Hi All,
Scenario: PROXY to FILE.
Requirement is to receive to two locations.
Is it possible to use single Inbound interface with multiple Receiver Agreements. I tried using two operation in the Inbound Service Interface, and Operation Specific in Determination. But couldnt proceed further. Do I need to use seperate Service Interface for two receiver locations?
Please suggest some solution.

Hi Naveen,
There is a possibility but in the case in the same server location with dynamic configuration: Placing file in two different directories using single receiver communication Channel
With different location you would need to develop a new adapter module as Amit Srivastava explains and develops here Send File to Two Different Locations using Adapter Module
Regards.

Similar Messages

Mapping in Services Interface with multiple operation... ?

Hi ALL,
I have a SOAP to SOAP scenario here Just PI 7.1 with EHP1 acting a bus no mapping nothing .
1) I have the WSDL file from the receiver system with multiple synchronous operations in it ..i imported the wsdl as External Definition .. i used the same the WSDL file to create the sender Service interface also...
when i created the service interface with the operation in it , i just gave the same operation name from the WSDL.this i followed for the sender and receiver service interface.
1)now the issue is do i need any operation mapping if the service interface has more than one operation ...?
2) I compelted the scenario without any operation mapping ..but i am getting this error ..Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -ICRM_D to receiver -EXACTTGETWEBSERVICE_D,http://ICRMtoExactTaetWebservice.com.si_os_ICRM_EXACTTETWEBSERVICE: No standard agreement found for , ICRM_D, , EXACTTARGEBSERVICE_D, http://ICRMtoExactarebservice.com, si_os_ICRM_EXACGETWEBSERVICE..?
pls help me in this issue..
Thanks
Souz

you might want to read this /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2010/09/08/service-interface-and-multiple-operations--is-it-just-an-hype
you will need to create additional configurations for multiple operations to be supported

Provider proxy error - Service Interface with multiple operations

Hello experts,
I've a synchronous provider proxy scenario using an inbound and outbound service interface.
That service interface contains 3 operations: create, change and delete a table entry.
I created all the necessary repository objects and integration scenario objects.
Next, I generated a provider proxy on the ECC backend system and created an endpoint via SOAMANAGER.
When I test, I get this error:
No implementing class registered for the interface (ABAP interface, request message ...., request message, namespace....)
I currently use a receiver XI adapter in the scenario. Is that ok?
or should I use a receiver SOAP adapter with a SOAP action?
Please advise.
Thanks a lot.
Dimitri

Hi,
Check these
INTERFACE_REGISTRATION_ERROR:No implementing class reg'd for interface
No implementing class registered for the interface
Regards
Seshagiri

Is there any information about using iCloud on a Mac with multiple user accounts (Mountain Lion)

When upgrading to Mountain Lion, you are asked to sign in using your iCloud ID. I don't understand how to set up the proper synching of "stuff" if your Mac has multiple user accounts, and they each have their own iCloud ID.
The whole issue of supporting multiple users on a Mac and making everything easy to understand with regard to iTunes and iCloud is, in my opinion, currently in a state of disaster. Apple needs to address this. They have conveniently made it a non-issue on iPads by not allowing multiple users. I can tell you that as one of the resident iOS and Apple experts in my office, most of the questions I get from others (not work-related) are on this topic. It needs to be easier to understand and accomplish.
Thanks in advance for any information you have on this subject.

CS7981 wrote:
is "Is there any benefit to using my Airport Express with my wireless router
no.

HT1751 Is it possible to use single external iTunes Library from multiple computers (my mac book, pc, mac mini)

Hi,
I recently decided to maintain my itunes libraries distrubuted onto different computers. (such as mac mini, mac book, pc)
I am planning to consolidate one of my iTunes library, move it to external source and configure external hard drive to be used by my iTunes library permanently.
For this purpose, I bought 5big NAS pro network storage hardware. I completed all basic setup and now I need help on designing access methodology.
Question is : Does external iTunes library supports to be used by more than one iTunes application? if not what will be the closest solution to save storage and ease of library management?
Thanks in advance
Serhan

Hi,
I recently decided to maintain my itunes libraries distrubuted onto different computers. (such as mac mini, mac book, pc)
I am planning to consolidate one of my iTunes library, move it to external source and configure external hard drive to be used by my iTunes library permanently.
For this purpose, I bought 5big NAS pro network storage hardware. I completed all basic setup and now I need help on designing access methodology.
Question is : Does external iTunes library supports to be used by more than one iTunes application? if not what will be the closest solution to save storage and ease of library management?
Thanks in advance
Serhan

Inbound Service Interface without Input Request Message

Is it possible to create an Inbound Service Interface without Input Request Message? We are trying to create a web service to get all records from a database table hence no input parameter is needed. We have tried in both XI 7.0 and PI 7.1 but couldn't do it. Is this scenario not supported by ESR or am I missing something? Any hint will be appreciated.
Regards,
Jiannan

In the scenario I described in my initial post the table structure is only needed in the response message to receive the data.
For a web service generated from a RFC function module using the service creation wizard (SE80) a table parameter is automatically included in the request message. I can understand this as the wizard can not figure out if the table parameter is needed in the request message or not.
I have tried to use the service creation wizard to generate a web service from the function module RFCPING that has no input or output parameters. As shown in below WSDL segment the WSDL does allow not having any input or output parameters.
- <wsdl:types>
- <xsd:schema attributeFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:soap:functions:mc-style">
- <xsd:element name="Rfcping">
- <xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence />
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="RfcpingResponse">
- <xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence />
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
</wsdl:types>
- <wsdl:message name="Rfcping">
<wsdl:part name="parameters" element="tns:Rfcping" />
</wsdl:message>
- <wsdl:message name="RfcpingResponse">
<wsdl:part name="parameter" element="tns:RfcpingResponse" />
</wsdl:message>
Thanks,
Jiannan

Service interface with 2 operations

I have a service interface with 2 operations...
so i have 2 operation mappipngs..
but when i create the interface determaination....it shows only one mapping...
should i create 2 interface determaitions????one for each opeartion??
if yes what should be the sender interface in that case while creting the interface determination..as it is not coming in the F4 help

HI ,
-- Create one outbound service interface with mutiple operatiosn name on left hand side.
-- Create One Inbound service interface with mutiple operations on left side.
-- create two operation mappings..
-- while creating operation mapping drag and drop the outbound service interface on sender side and it will show you 2 opetions select one and same case while adding receiver service interface on operation mapping.
repeat the procedure for second operation mapping also.
-- now when you create interface determination on ID side you see two operations on left hand side of interface determination object select first and assign respected operation mapping then select second and assign second operation mapping..
Thanks,
Bhupesh

Use WLC's service interface IP when add WLC into WCS

Hi All,
Does anybody know if there's any limitations or bugs to use WLC's service interface IP when add WLC into WCS?
Another question is I remember there's a post previously says that there are a bug regarding to ARP if the WLC not using LAG but connect one port to one switch, connect another port to another switch, so that's why it is strongly suggested to use LAG, but I can't find it now, anybody know it? Thanks!

The service port is controlled by the service-port interface and is reserved for out-of-band management of the controller and system recovery and maintenance in the event of a network failure. It is also the only port that is active when the controller is in boot mode. The service port is not capable of carrying 802.1Q tags, so it must be connected to an access port on the neighbor switch.
If the service port is in use, the management interface must be on a different supernet from the service-port interface.
The service-port interface controls communications through and is statically mapped by the system to the service port. It must have an IP address on a different supernet from the management, AP-manager, and any dynamic interfaces, and it cannot be mapped to a backup port. This configuration enables you to manage the controller directly or through a dedicated operating system network, such as 10.1.2.x, which can ensure service access during network downtime.
The service port can obtain an IP address using DHCP, or it can be assigned a static IP address, but a default gateway cannot be assigned to the service-port interface. Static routes can be defined through the controller for remote network access to the service port.

Cancel Payment using XAI Inbound Service (CC&B)

Hi All,
Do you have any idea how to cancel payment using XAI in CC&B?
Now Im using xai Inbound service (SSvcPaymentEventMaintenance) to do cancellation process, but it just affects for the payment status only, meaning payment and payment tender status become cancel but the payment amount for the related bill is still not deducted. The bill is still in status "Fully Matched". Seems the financial transaction for payment cancellation is not created. Any idea about this ?
Thank you,
Taufix

You must use a Business Service to perform such actions, although there is no such default available even in the Demo data, follow below steps (assuming you are on CC&B 2.2.x or higher):
- Create/Configure a Business Service using Service Program 'CILPTNDP - Cancel Payment Tender'.
- Create/Configure a SS with following steps (SS Schema would contain the Payment Event Id):
1. Invoke/read Payment Event and retrieve the PAY_TENDER_ID
2. Invoke Business Service created above for each PAY_TENDER_ID by providing the Cancel Reason Code.
- Expose above created SS as an XAI Inbound Service.

Is it possible to use External Defiantion in Interface Mapping?

Hi Experts,
Is it possible to use External defination in Interface mapping? I used this ED in Message Mapping but I am unable to use the same ED for Interface Mapping?
In order to create Interface Mapping I need to create Message Interface and use it in Interface Mappiong?
Thanks
Rajeev

Hi Rajeev,
External definitions is for importing avaliable external DTD,XSD or WSDLs instead of creating them in XI environment maually by creating elements under datatypes,assigning them too Message types and Message Interfaces etc.Where as you fo for Imported Archives to import externally done Mapping programs like JAVA,ABAP and XSLT mappings but not define Mesage interfaces.
So you can create message interface import appropriate External definition into it.Later use it during interface mapping.Hope you understand it.
Thanks,
Ram.

Any possible issues using Captivate 4 on Vista 64-bit OS?

Hi:
Looking to order a new PC and load up on ram for Captivate 4 and some other applications I am using.
I realize Captivate 4 is not certified for use on a Vista 64 bit OS, but I am wondering if I will run into a bunch of performance issues or what your experience may be using C4 on a 64 bit machine. I heard it is possible to force Captivate 4 to run as a 32bit application, but I don't know specifically how to do it.
Any feedback is appreciated.

None that I found. I worked with adobe for a while and they sent me a couple of patchs that were supposed to fix the problem, and while I eventually could record audio, I never was able to edit it. Adobe eventually lost interest and stopped responding to my requests. I think it has something to do with Vista becasue I am running xp on a brand new 64bit Mac at home and it works fine.
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:12:06 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Any possible issues using Captivate 4 on Vista 64-bit OS?
I have the same problem on 64-bit Vista - the audio editor will not even open. Is there a solution to this?
>

Service interface with more than one operation

Hi all,
is it possible to have a service interface with more than one operation?
I have found this blog:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3414900)ID0209118050DB10459657028039341762End?blog=/pub/wlg/15123
But this sentence:
ABAP proxy (inbound/ outbound) cannot be developed out of a Service Interface having Operations with different type of messages included. If an ABAP proxy is to be developed then all the messages included should be of one type i.e. either the included messages should be Message Type, External Message, IDOC or RFC Message. This behavior can be observed when a Service Interface is created and then subjected for a check
regards

Hi,
now the interface is running but I get another error in .NET.
"The header 'Diagnostic' from the namespace 'http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30' was not understood by the recipient of this message, causing the message to not be processed. This error typically indicates that the sender of this message has enabled a communication protocol that the receiver cannot process. Please ensure that the configuration of the client's binding is consistent with the service's binding. "
Any ideas?
regards

Mail wants to use the restricted Service "Search With Google."

This is the response/error I see when I try to do a Google search from an email message - "Mail wants to use the restricted Service “Search With Google.”"

Interesting - I just created a new user account I named "Test", and tried "Search With Google" in Notes and it worked fine in this new account. Without any additional change, I went back into my normal user account, and tried to use "Search with Google" on the highlighted word, and it pulled up the Google search fine as well. No reason I can think of that these actions would have resolved the problem - e.g., either the creation of the "Test" account, or switching between this "Test" account and my normal account. Possibly creating new account caused a cleanup of the Safari preferences to point to version 6.0.(essentially reset the default)
Would be curious if droow007 solution works for others. Definitely quicker than the route I went :~)

In OSB, Single business service to handle multiple Stored procedures

Hi,
In OSB we have a package and within that there are 8 overloaded stored procedures. DO we have to create 8 business services or is it possible to create single business service and pass differrent messages to it.
Thanks,
Vinoth

Hi Vinoth,
You have to create 8 dbadapters and hence 8 business services. Better you create one stored procedure which internally calls these 8 stored procedures on the basis of conditions you have and create only one DB adapter and hence one business service to invoke this sinlge stored procedure.
Regards,
Anuj

Can we use applets as user interfaces with sockets, RMI and J2EE

Dear Sir or Madam,
Since I am a TA for software architecture class, some one ask me the following question: I think the answer is "No" based on the document on http://java.sun.com/sfaq/
How I answer the quesions? Looking forward your help!!!
1.You may have 2 applets and 2 html files. One applet with one html file may stay at a client PC and run on this PC, and the other applet with the other html file may stay at a server PC and run on this PC. In this case, all the applets are run locally.
2.Could applets works with sockets, RMI and J2EE?
3.Can we use applets as user interfaces with sockets, RMI and J2EE?
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Jing

The scenario you paint doesn't quite make sense. The "server PC" wouldn't be running an applet, normally, since applets are by definition in a web browser page, and most likely involve user interaction, and "server processes" generally are done without user interaction.
The security rules around applets are that -- by default -- applets can connect with sockets ONLY to the server from whence the applet was loaded. RMI uses sockets (J2EE is too broad a spec) and hence RMI calls would also be limited to the server from whence the applet was loaded. Within that limitation, an applet could open all the sockets it wants, so long as they are all on the server from whence the applet was loaded.
If you want two applets on two different systems to communicate with each other, the simplest way is to have them rendevous through a server process on the server(s) from whence each applet was loaded. Maybe it's PC-a <-> server-a <-> server-b <-> PC-b ...? Or maybe PC-a and PC-b both are talking to the same server.
The limitation is rooted in the security subsystem. You can specify a policy file and override anything in the security subsystem. That does mean signing the applet and then cajoling the user into agreeing to grant greater levels of security than the default. In such a case you can open sockets more broadly and then PC-a could talk directly to PC-b without going through any servers.
- David

Any possiblity to use single Inbound Service Interface with multiple Receiver Agreements

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for