Service interface with 2 operations

I have a service interface with 2 operations...
so i have 2 operation mappipngs..
but when i create the interface determaination....it shows only one mapping...
should i create 2 interface determaitions????one for each opeartion??
if yes what should be the sender interface in that case while creting the interface determination..as it is not coming in the F4 help

HI ,
-- Create one outbound service interface with mutiple operatiosn name on left hand side.
-- Create One Inbound service interface with mutiple operations on left side.
-- create two operation mappings..
-- while creating operation mapping drag and drop the outbound service interface on sender side and it will show you 2 opetions select one and same case while adding receiver service interface on operation mapping.
repeat the procedure for second operation mapping also.
-- now when you create interface determination on ID side you see two operations on left hand side of interface determination object select first and assign respected operation mapping then select second and assign second operation mapping..
Thanks,
Bhupesh

Similar Messages

Mapping in Services Interface with multiple operation... ?

Hi ALL,
I have a SOAP to SOAP scenario here Just PI 7.1 with EHP1 acting a bus no mapping nothing .
1) I have the WSDL file from the receiver system with multiple synchronous operations in it ..i imported the wsdl as External Definition .. i used the same the WSDL file to create the sender Service interface also...
when i created the service interface with the operation in it , i just gave the same operation name from the WSDL.this i followed for the sender and receiver service interface.
1)now the issue is do i need any operation mapping if the service interface has more than one operation ...?
2) I compelted the scenario without any operation mapping ..but i am getting this error ..Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -ICRM_D to receiver -EXACTTGETWEBSERVICE_D,http://ICRMtoExactTaetWebservice.com.si_os_ICRM_EXACTTETWEBSERVICE: No standard agreement found for , ICRM_D, , EXACTTARGEBSERVICE_D, http://ICRMtoExactarebservice.com, si_os_ICRM_EXACGETWEBSERVICE..?
pls help me in this issue..
Thanks
Souz

you might want to read this /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2010/09/08/service-interface-and-multiple-operations--is-it-just-an-hype
you will need to create additional configurations for multiple operations to be supported

Service interface with more than one operation

Hi all,
is it possible to have a service interface with more than one operation?
I have found this blog:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3414900)ID0209118050DB10459657028039341762End?blog=/pub/wlg/15123
But this sentence:
ABAP proxy (inbound/ outbound) cannot be developed out of a Service Interface having Operations with different type of messages included. If an ABAP proxy is to be developed then all the messages included should be of one type i.e. either the included messages should be Message Type, External Message, IDOC or RFC Message. This behavior can be observed when a Service Interface is created and then subjected for a check
regards

Hi,
now the interface is running but I get another error in .NET.
"The header 'Diagnostic' from the namespace 'http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30' was not understood by the recipient of this message, causing the message to not be processed. This error typically indicates that the sender of this message has enabled a communication protocol that the receiver cannot process. Please ensure that the configuration of the client's binding is consistent with the service's binding. "
Any ideas?
regards

Any possiblity to use single Inbound Service Interface with multiple Receiver Agreements

Hi All,
Scenario: PROXY to FILE.
Requirement is to receive to two locations.
Is it possible to use single Inbound interface with multiple Receiver Agreements. I tried using two operation in the Inbound Service Interface, and Operation Specific in Determination. But couldnt proceed further. Do I need to use seperate Service Interface for two receiver locations?
Please suggest some solution.

Hi Naveen,
There is a possibility but in the case in the same server location with dynamic configuration: Placing file in two different directories using single receiver communication Channel
With different location you would need to develop a new adapter module as Amit Srivastava explains and develops here Send File to Two Different Locations using Adapter Module
Regards.

Provider proxy error - Service Interface with multiple operations

Hello experts,
I've a synchronous provider proxy scenario using an inbound and outbound service interface.
That service interface contains 3 operations: create, change and delete a table entry.
I created all the necessary repository objects and integration scenario objects.
Next, I generated a provider proxy on the ECC backend system and created an endpoint via SOAMANAGER.
When I test, I get this error:
No implementing class registered for the interface (ABAP interface, request message ...., request message, namespace....)
I currently use a receiver XI adapter in the scenario. Is that ok?
or should I use a receiver SOAP adapter with a SOAP action?
Please advise.
Thanks a lot.
Dimitri

Hi,
Check these
INTERFACE_REGISTRATION_ERROR:No implementing class reg'd for interface
No implementing class registered for the interface
Regards
Seshagiri

One Service Interface with SOAP (sync/async)?

Hi experts,
Iu2019m configuring the following scenario SOAP -> PI 7.1 -> ABAP proxies.
My Service Interface has four different operations, 1 is sync and 3 are async. I want to use SOAP adapter as I donu2019t need to use WS-RM and WS-A of WS adapter. So, I have two SOAP communication channels (sync/async). But, when I try to create the sender agreements, PI only let me to create one, as the second has the same name Iu2019m not able to do it, it tells me that the object already exists.
How can I create this scenario where an outbound service interface has several operations with different Quality of Service (sync/async)?
Anyone has faced this situation before?
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo.

When you have one interface with several operations, you need only to have one sender agreement with that interface.
The mapping is based on operation, not on interface. You can have different receiver interfaces, or one receiver interface with several operations.
The QoS can be added in the target URL, when you have the chance to apply different URLs based on the operation in the client.
Regards
Stefan

LSO Web Services Interfacing with Training vendors?

Hello All,
Has anyone implemented the LSO Web Services. We're on LSO300 so our options are the enroll, un-enroll and launch services. If we'de want to track we would need to write our own. Just wnat to get people's experiences as far as implementation. How much work needed to adapt to vendor services, implementation times to adapt existing service, create new. Has anyone gone beyond the provided services to create their own? What about file/ftp interfacing for data loads? Any real life experiences appreciated.
Thanks,
Doug

Thanks Sharon,
We won't be upgrading soon and regardless won't be using PI as we're a BizTalk shop. I'm trying to pinpoint scenarios under which WebService based integration would be a more obvious decision.
- Use of a single training vendor would simplify things. I'm finding little common ground among a few vendors AP uses as far as their support for services and what they look like. A complication and increased $$$$.
- Use of PI to at least match what SAP delivers and leverage any integrations they provide with key vendors. We won't be using PI.
- An excuse to dabble in this area. We could use that.
Does this sound like a fair read so far? I'm charged with investigating all options as part of this project and have done that, but am honestly not seeing any great benefit in pursuing services at this point. We'll probably wind up getting flat files back from vendors and loading that way.
Thanks for the insights.
Doug

Creating Entity Object from Service Interface - JDeveloper version 11.1.1.3

In our project, we don't intend to have any JDBC connection to a database and want to create all my entity objects using SDO web services deployed in a remote server. I could create an entity object based on a SDO web service deployed in the standalone WL server successfully. But at the time of Development,when I select ADF Business Component --> Entity Object, it always takes to a screen that prompts for a JDBC connection, if you have no connection defined in the project yet. To bypass this, I need to create a valid connection to a local DB and then I can go the next page that prompts me to to choose service interface and asks for a WSDL URL. How do I get around creating a JDBC connection and create a service interface based data source directly?
To get around this issue, I created a connection to a local DB by providing a wrong password to make sure that we don't need a valid db connection. The application module (Business Component Browser) works fine when the DB connection is broken. But when I create a JSF page and put the data control there, if we don't have the DB connection established it gives error during deployment.I tried deleting the unused connection, but that gives a lot of errors during deployment. My question is;
1. How can I create a service interface based data source by-passing the requirement for a connection?
2. If that's not possible - how can I cleanly delete the JDBC connection and all it's dependencies, so that, it deploys and runs without error

Frank,
Thanks for your response.
I have made some progress in last two days and solved some of the original issues. I deleted the fake JDBC connection from connection.xml that I had to use to go to the second screen that lets me select the WSDL for the service interface. After that, I checked off the "Auto Generate and Synchronize ..." option from Application --> Application Properties --> Deployment. (thanks to Steve Muench's blog post on this subject). After that, I could deploy the JSF page and the page shows up with no problem.
However, when I try to run the App Module that was created from the WSDL (service interface), it brings up a pop-up with heading "Password Required" that says "Enter the password for" and asks for a user name and password (not sure what they are as they take any value and takes me to the next screen). After that, I can open the View and navigate through it. When i change some data and try to commit - it makes the change to the data and stores in the DB but gives an error saying "(oracle.jbo.NotConnectedException) JBO-25200: Application module is not connected to a database."
Also, the data control created from the service interface had operations called Commit and Rollback. I used the Commit on JSF page and that does the exact same thing too. Any idea?
Also - when we consume a SDO WSDL to create the entity object - how can we access the SOAP Request and Response objects? We have to implement WS-Security by instrumenting the SOAP header and need to get a handle on that. Is there a mechanism similar to JAX-WS handler framework for SDO?
R,
Chandan

Synchronous interface without Service Interface and Mapping

Hi all,
Short and simple question: Is it possible to set up a synchronous interface without using Service Interfaces and (Operation and Message) Mapping?
In my case I would like to create an interface with a SOAP and File adapter.
Cheers,
Mac

Hi Mac,
>>Short and simple question: Is it possible to set up a synchronous interface without using Service Interfaces and (Operation and Message) Mapping?
Yes possible provided you have both Sync adapter as sender and receiver. For eg: Soap sender --> PI --> HTTP adapter
>>In my case I would like to create an interface with a SOAP and File adapter.
Sync scenario using File adapter as receiver is not possible. Because File adapter works asynchronously.
Regards
Suraj

Service Interfaces not showing in the IP when imported in ID in PI7.1

HI Experts,
     I have developed an Integration process(IP) in ESR using some Service interfaces and Operation mapping for implementing BPM.
I am trying to import the IP into my Integration Directory. But the imported Integration process(which is now as good as a Business Service) does not show the Interfaces i have used in the BPM in the ESR.
   Without the interfaces being attached to the IP, i cannot create RD and ID's.
This is the first time BPM is being configured in this server.
Please guide me if there are any settings specific to ccBPM to be done in ECC.
Please help me resolve this issue... i am in a crictical condition to meet the deadline..
Thanx in advance,
Nandan

Hi Neetesh,
         Thanx for your reply. If there are any initial settings to be done in PI, please list them so that i can check if they exist in our system.
Also,when i check(f7) my IP , its showing a message that " Container element my_interface in step Send1 is initialized but is not used ". Is this a concern ?
I have copy pasted my interface names in the RD and InterfaceDtrmn in my ID and completed the ID part of configuration.When i test the BPM by triggering my Purchase Orders from my sender service,it is showing the following error in moni:
"<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">UNKNOWN_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>No object type found for the message. Check that the corresponding process is activated</SAP:Stack> " in error section and in TRace its showing this error:
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">could not create BPE proxy for message, no XML object definition found for message 70126C4C0C4D0B11E1000000AC113034</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
Please suggest how these can be resolved????

ADF BC Web Service - authenticate with JSESSIONID

Hi!
I create ADF Fusion Application Web project. I add a jspx page to ViewController project called "welcome.jspx" and secure Application with HTTP Basic authentication. Now in ViewController page I add POJO class and create webservice from it. Now I run the project and I can access welcome.jspx page only if I provide correct username and password. Now in ViewController project i choose Test WebService on WSDL. If i send test request, I get 403 unathorized. If I add JSESSIONID cookie in the request header, I can access webservice.
Now in Model project I create simple entity, view on top of it and add to the ApplicationModule. Now in ApplicationModule I create web service from it (Service interface) with method getByKey. I deploy whole application. If I select Test Webservice on the ApplicationModule's generated WSDL I can access webservice without providing securityCredentials. I can access it without providing JSESSIONID cookie (note the difference to the ViewController project). I know that ViewController project and Model have different ContextRoot and I speculate that why it goes (I know that two projects (Model, ViewController) cannot have the same Security Context). In created ApplicationModule I override prepareSession method and monitor who is logged in when executing ADF BC WebService. If I do not provide JSESSIONID cookie the logged "user" in is anonymous, If do provide it, I am logged in as user for which that JSESSIONID is created.
I know I can secure webservice by attaching security policy, such as oracle/wss_usernamename.* (Soap:Header requires username/password) or oracle/http_token policy and if I do so, I must provide security credentials everytime - I do not like that. I would like to achieve that if I provide JSESSIONID cookie I am authenticated, if do not provide it, I receive 403 unauthorized - the same behaviour as is in the ViewController Dummy webservice.
So is it possible to add second context root or something like that to the ApplicationSecurity (jazn*.xml files or something like that) to enforce the same security for Model part?
Perhaps I should explain what I am doing:
- we have ADF model with service enabled ApplicationModules (web services based on application modules) and now we are building clients to consume them. We have created simple LoginPage (in ViewCOntroller project) where we obtain JSESSIONID cookie. Now we want to contanct websercie with JSESSIONID cookie and weblogic must recognize us, but in case JSESSIONID cookie is not present, invalid - a 401 unauthorized should ne returned.
Can you provide some hints how to work on?

That's the end goal, but I haven't gotten that far. I'm using the 11.1.1.7 versions of ADF JDeveloper and the BPM suite. I'm attempting to consume an ADF BC web service from my BPM process using the Composer tool, but I first need to figure out how to publish/register the ADF BC web service with the BPM so that I can reference the ADF BC web service in the implementation of the BPM Service Task as a Service Call. I thought I could register the ADF BC web service with the BPM using the BPM business catalog but when I attempt to add a new service and give it the WSDL generated from JDeveloper I get this error:
BPM-71536: BCModelsService.wsdl has a dependency to BCModelsService.xsd that cannot be resolved.

Service Interface: How to create an SDO graph with tow Objects

Hi,
I want to create a Web service interface on top of my application module. Using the Service Interface I select the app mod, service methods and view objects from the data model. My data model consists of a master detail relationship. The Web service should provide an interface that uses a master and its details as parameters in an operation.
For example a customer and his credit cards. A GET-Operation should return a data structure that groups all objects.
I do not know how I can configure such a web service.
How can I achieve such a web service?
Do I have to code a service method and what is the return type of the method?
Can I work with existing VOs?
Do I need 'special' preconditions like a composition between master and detail?
Any idea?
Thanks,
Markus

Hi Scott
Bad news. I read several time this thread, but I have not found error in my program ... .
And I can not see what are really doing APIs of APEX.
Time is going - so we have make a decision now.
Probably (as I have no more answers at this forum) - we can not use APEX (as nobody using APEX sessions as I asked),
as we can not manage its sessions programmatically (too risky).
Thanks for your answer.
Andres

Multiple Operation in Service Interface

Hi Experts,
Here is the problem -
Scenario: SOAP Adapter-> PI (7.1) -> XI Adapter -> ERP Proxy
We have defined multiple operation in Service Interface using Interface pattern "Stateless".
Message posted using SOAP adapter goes through PI alright. But on ERP is throws the error saying "No implementing class registered for the interface"
Well the checklist-
1. Proxy class generated/re-generated. Class/Interface/Methods all activated.
2. If I remove all the operation from Service interface and just have one with the same name as Service Interface (which is also default when you create new service interface) it works fine.
Any idea guys ?
Regards.

Hi Sreenivas,
I appreciate your promptness in answering the query.
1. And I know that if you select Stateless (XI 3.0), in the service interface you just can't have multiple operations.
2. ID contents are generated fine (I dont do it manually. I just import the scenario from ESR).
Please, first test yourself and let me know if you succeed or point me to some document explaining that.
Regards.

Using Enhanced Receiver Determination with a Synchronous Service Interface

Hi Experts,
I want to use ERD on a Synchronous Interface. Is that possible? Perhaps it has no sense, because in an ERD you can choice multiple receivers and that its against the synchronous philosophy: what if you declare 2 or more receivers, from wich one has the right response to be taken?
In technical terms I build the operation mapping as it is written both in the blog (/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16) and the SAP HELP.
But in my OM I have as source service interface one Abstract Synchronous and in the target I have one Abstract Asynchronous wich is not possible. So I tried many tricks like creating my own synchronous ReceiverDetermination Service Interface in my SWC, but it is not detected. Other trick will be modifying the standart SI, but it will affect the next guy trying to use ERD with an Asynchronous interface
The point its that it is a little funny that the receiver determination allows using ERD with a synchronous SI wich makes me think that it will be possible...
Is it possible to use ERD with a Synchronous Interface?
Regards
Gonzalo

i have seen Enhanced RD with lookups that work. Have to say it was not a RFC lookup used but rather a DB look in one of the implementations i had worked with. But still I really dont think a RFC lookup should be an issue.
Troubleshoot the lookup mapping to be working other than in the enhanced RD (i.e independently) .
if you head no where, i suggest opening a OSS note.

Service Form interface with RACF DB2 Databases

We are looking for a way to have service form interface with RACF using DB2 connect. This function is needed to perform data validation against mainframe system. Any advice or instructions of how to implement this is greatly appreciated.

I am using Weblogic workshop test browser to test this code. My Ws code looks like this.
package WebServ;
public class AsyncWebServ1 implements com.bea.jws.WebService
* @common:control
* @jc:timer repeats-every="30 s" timeout="60 s"
private com.bea.control.TimerControl MyTimerControl;
* This member variable stores the client choice to be sent a callback or not.
public boolean m_useCallback;
* When the callback handler is fired, this boolean is set to true.
* Clients that don't want callbacks check this boolean to see if their result is ready.
public boolean m_messageIsReceived;
public Callback callback;
* @common:control
private Control.xmlDocWSControl xmldocwscontrol;
static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private String xmlString = "";
private String strName = "";
* @common:operation
* @jws:conversation phase="start"
public void getWSEmplyeeInfoCON(String aName)
MyTimerControl.start();
xmlString = xmldocwscontrol.getEmplyeeDtlsCon(aName);
return ;
public interface Callback extends com.bea.control.ServiceControl
* @jws:conversation phase="finish"
public void testCallback(String result);
* @common:operation
public void MyTimerControl_onTimeout(long time)
//xmlString = xmldocwscontrol.getEmplyeeDtlsCon(aName);
if(!m_useCallback)
m_messageIsReceived = true;
else
callback.testCallback(xmlString);
MyTimerControl.stop();
return;
* @common:operation
* @jws:conversation phase="continue"
* @jws:protocol form-post="false" form-get="true"
public boolean checkStatus()
return m_messageIsReceived;
* @common:operation
* @jws:conversation phase="finish"
* @jws:protocol form-get="true" form-post="false"
public String getMessageResponse()
return xmlString;
* @common:operation
* @jws:conversation phase="start"
public void requestMessage(boolean useCallback)
m_useCallback = useCallback;
// Start the delay timer.
MyTimerControl.start();
return;
The value of xmlString can be hard coded.
Saju

Service interface with 2 operations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for