Any Workaround to SORT ITEMS in a CATEGORY portlet ??

I HAVE A PAGE WITH 3 CATEGORY PORTLETS.
BUT I CANNOT SUCCEED TO SORT THE ITEMS DEFAULT/DESCENDING
DID ANYBODY MANAGE TO DO THIS ?
TKS IN ADVANCE!!

ANY SUGGESTIONS??

Similar Messages

CCM - How to make items in one category to be sorted as expected?

Hi,
I'm searching for a way to sort items in one category in CCM, so that when end users open Catalog via SRM, click into the category, they can see some items on top of the list automatically.
I had thought the items should be sorted by Item Valuation and also tried to upload items in CCM in the order I wanted. But when I created shopping cart as an end user to connect to catalog, the order of the items are totally different. And I even could not tell how the items are sorted, it seems it's not by item valuation, not by item description, not by price, not by anything... Is it that in the catalog search engine the items are not sorted at all?
Can somebody share with me how I can realize that? Many thanks!
Best Regards,
Elly

Hi Elly,
You can use the information [here |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ccm20/helpdata/en/3f/3166e98d564c45ba9385187d7cc3cb/content.htm]to determine the sort order of characteristics, this is all that can be effectively maintained.
Regards,
Jason

Displaying category portlets in alphabetic order

Hi Folks,
When I publish a Category Portlet all items inside this portlet appear in a randomic order.
I wish they could appear in alphabetic order.
Is that possible ? How can I do it ?
Thanks!

The items in a category portlet are sorted by the folder and the region id within the folder.
It is not possible to provide a sort order for the items currently, however in 9.0.2, this portlet will be replaced by a customizable search portlet, which allows different sorting options.

Inter-Organization transfer is not being possible..any workaround?

We were using Inter ORG transfer whiich is a seeded function in Oracle Inv module to transfer material from ORG A to ORG B
Navigation
(N)Inventory>Transactions>Inter-Organization Transfer
Now the problem is our items are not centralised.That is For example an item semi-conductors has a different item code opened for ORG A and a different for ORG B
Suppose ORG A code is SCND.000001
and ORG B code is SCND.000002
we have a two segment item flexfield
When ORG A tries to ship to ORG B, it doesnt appear in InterORG form since an item has to be enables in both the ORGS, source and detination, and since opur items are not centralised thats not possib
So what the user does is assigns the itemcode associated with his ORG to the Destination ORG too
Now when the Destination ORG receives the shipment , he has to receive in the new code assigned to him..Now has a result he has two codes which means reporting gets disturbed, history is difficult to find, manageability becomes hard..
Could you please suggesta workaround for this

Sandeep Gandhi, Independent Consultant wrote:
Any workaround is going to be hard and cumbersome. And that is because you are running counter to the industry practice of having the same item number across for the same item in your organizations? What is the second segment for? Is it a revision of sorts?We have 3 segment item categories
only the first segment is used , ACCS for accessory items, CHEM for chemical items, MECH for mechanical items
and in item, the first segment is used to represent the category the item belongs to
like ACCS or CHEM or MECH
than each new item is incremented by 1 in second segment, like ACCS.000001, next one would be ACCS.000002 and so on
We have more than 150,000 items and duplication cannot be eliminated, but it can be reduced..any advices for it??
>
One of the workaround will be to receive SCND.0002 and then do a RE-ID transaction (i.e. issue out 0002 and issue in 0001). But you will still need some kind of custom reports /screens if you need to tie the history together.I have already given this workaround but this is not acceptable and effective
Can we use internal requisitions?? i guess we cant without OM? right?

Tax code does not appear in any G/L account item Message FF753

Dear all,
During creating billing document, the system cannot post account document and display the follow error message:
FF753 Tax code does not appear in any G/L account item.
I tried to trace the program and found internal table t_bseg containing 3 entries:
1: Customer a/c: without tax code
2: GR clearing a/c: without tax code
3: Output tax a/c: contain tax code
Customer a/c and GR clearing a/c without tax code causes this error.
Anyone know how to solve it?
Thanks & B.Regards

Hi,
In FS00 for GR/IR A/c in Control data, in Tax Category choose all tax types allowed (*) and also tick posting without tax allowed and try again.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Is there any workaround at all to run PM7 on a Intel-based Mac?

Dear friends:
I have recently purchased a MacBook Pro and, before I did, I asked some questions to Apple about the possibility of having the software pre-installed, specifically, BootCamp and Classic, receiving the computer with a partition already made and requirements of the sort. Basically, Technical Support told me that they were not able to perform any of these tasks, although the person I have spoken to said to me that I could run PageMaker (I think he mentioned an update). After a couple of days researching, it appears that I have been misinformed. Unfortunately I have several hundreds of PageMaker files in archive, and I cannot afford to lose the ability to open them directly (I am a radical InDesign fan, I have used it since v.1.0). Does anybody know any workaround at all to run PageMaker 7 on a Intel-based Mac? Maybe some software to emulate the Classic? Maybe an upgrade or a third-party application? I cannot believe that MacOS supports Windows (in fact, I have installed Windows Vista) better than its predecessor Mac OS 9.2.2.
Thanks a lot for your time,
Eduardo Guarniz

>Does anybody know any workaround at all to run PageMaker 7 on a Intel-based Mac?
Well there are two ways. the best way is to have an old machine that boots OS9. If you don't have one, buy one. I found one for about $69 a few years ago I'm sure they are even cheaper now.
There is some software called SheepShaver its supposed to run Classic apps on a Mactel. With all the problems of running PM in Classic (I would never use PM for production in Classic) Its probably even worse running on SheepShaver.
Be smart get the old machine.

Reporting on master data customer and bad performances : any workaround ?

Hello,
I've been asked to investiguate on bad performances encountered when performing reporting
on the specific master data zcustomer.
Basically this master data has a quite similar design that 0customer, there are 96000 entries in the master data table.
A simple query has been developed : the reporting is done on the master data zcustomer and its attributes : no key figure, no calculation, no restriction ...
Nevertheless, the query can not be executed .. the query runs around 10 minute in rsrt, then the private memory is exhausted and then a short dump is generated.
I tried to buid a very simple query on 0customer, this time, without the attributes ... and it took more than 30 sec before I get the results.
I checked the queries statistics :
3.x Analyzer Server 10 sec
OLAP: Read Texts : 20 sec
How is it that it is so long to performthe reporitng on those master data, while in the same time If i try to display the content in SAP by choosing "maintain master data", I have an immediate answer.
I there any workaround ?
Any help would be really appreciated.
thank you.
Raoul

Hi.
How much data have you got in the cube?
If you make no restrictions, you are asking the system to return data for all 96.000 customers. That is one thing that might take some time.
Also, using the attributes of this customer object, fx making selection or displaying several of them, means that the system has to run through the 96.000 records in masterdata to know what goes where in the report.
When you display the masterdata, you are by default displaying just the 250 or so first hits, and you are not joining against any cube or sorting the result set, so that is fast.
You should make some kind of restriction on other things than zcustomer (time, org.unit, version, etc, to limit the dataset from the cube, but also a restriction on one of the zcustomer attribs, with an index for that maybe, and performance should improve.
br
Jacob

How to update Item(Product/Product category) Description ??????

Hi
I have to update Item(Product/Product category) Description in opportunity/ lead during Create.I have created the opportunity using the FM BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI in CRM 5.0 .But i am unable to update the product description details.
It is an urgent requirement.please provide me with the correct function modules or any sample code in this regards.
Thanks in Advance,
Shwetha.
[email protected]

Hi Shwetha!
I have never used this FM....but i have had a look and u hace to update the structure:
PRODUCTS STRUCTURE BAPIBUS20001_PRODUCTS
In this structure: BAPIBUS20001_PRODUCTS-SHORT_TEXT.
Regards,
Mon

Possible to reassign catalog items to another category?

Hello all
First of all I want to say a BIG THANK YOU ALL!!! Here SRM users, gurus, specialists, newbies can find a real great community! Good to perfect answers and solutions, really fast reactions, very kind people, ... Hopefully I will be able to give some things back soon (besides rewarding with points) as I'm learning more and more from day to day from you all!
But... I have one more question: is it possible (and if yes how) to reassign catalog items to another category. We're on CCM 2.0 SP03 and couldn't find such a function until now. Is there a report we can run? Or do we have to delete and rebuild the content again? We have some manually added items and would like to have them move to another catalog category.
Any useful help will of course be rewarded with points!
Kind regards and keep up the good work,
Renaud

Hi Chris
Our category structure has the following structure:
/CCM/MASTER_CATALOG
   > Main schema node
      > Node 1
         > Node 1.1 (product cat. X)
         > Node 1.2 (product cat. Y)
         > ...
      > Node 2
         > Node 2.1 (product cat. A)
         > Node 2.2 (product cat. B)
         > ...
      > Node 3
         > Node 3.1 (product cat. I)
         > Node 3.2 (product cat. II)
         > ...
      > Node 4
         > Node 4.1 (product cat. a)
         > Node 4.2 (product cat. b)
         > ...
In CCM CAT (catalog authoring tool) it is possible to manually add some catalog items (material). They're assigned to the category (node) you're actually in. We have accidentally manually put (created) some materials this way in node 2 directly (yes, that's possible) and want to move those items to node 3.
Those manually added items are not coming from a supplier or SRM extracted catalog! Thus there is NO MAPPING between categories from supplier or SRM extracted catalog to our /CCM/MASTER_CATALOG.
However, those items have a product category assigned (attribute /CCM/PRODUCT_CATEGORY if I recall correctly). Because without it the process within SRM (like backend system determination, purch.group determ., etc.) will not work properly.
All this doesn't seem to help when wanting to move such items from node 2 to node 3. It seems like in that case we need to delete the items and recreate them again in the correct node.
Hope this clarified our problem description a bit. Sometimes its quite difficult to explain without being able to show it on the screen...
Thanks for further suggestions!
Kind regards,
Renaud

Get Approval Group by pass item or its category

We make Approval Group based on item category for PR or PO approval. The question is , i want to get approval group based on item or its category. Just pass item id and get which approval group is going to approval this item.
i got po_control_rules table it just contains categories range in description form, but didn't get any proper help.
Pl suggest solution
Regards,
Edited by: user9092987 on Apr 14, 2011 6:35 AM

Shaukat,
First do select category_id from mtl_item_categories using inventory_item_id.
You may get multiple records back. In that case, use the category_set_id to narrow down to the record that is applicable.
Then select the category segments from mtl_categories using the category_id.
Then compare the segments with the segment fields in po_control_rules to identify the correct approval group.
Hope this answers your question,
Sandeep Gandhi

Any workarounds for not supported features of XML Schema

Hi,
We are trying to generate JAVA source code by providing a xsd.
This XML Schema file has all sorts of Identity constraints & attribute wildcards.
Due to the above reasons I am unable to generate the code.
Are there any workarounds? If so Please share those.
Thanks & Regards,
Priti Ranka

I am sorry I did not mention the tech. being used.
I am using JAXB for the above task.

How to handle foreign purchasing without LCM.Any workaround??

Hi All,
I am looking for a good workaround for foreign purchasing since i don't have the oracle LCM module.at the point of PO we do not know other charges like freight,custom duty and insurance etc...,However these needs to be incorporated into the item cost. Any workaround ??
Regards,
Chanaka

This is an excellent point – all other updates in Creative Cloud are unforced and up to the customer as to when they are installed... The Creative Cloud Desktop app should be as well.
Hope Adobe can change this.
Note: Here is the update history, on average about once per month –
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/release-note/cc-release-notes.html

ORACLE treats empty Strings as NULL, Any workaround?

Hi,
ORACLE treats empty Strings as NULL.
I am writing, rather modifying Java code to make it work with both SQLServer and Oracle. Since our code is already working for SQLServer, now I have the problem in porting to Oracle wherever I have empty strings. I used to insert empty strings into coulumns in SQLServers, the same SQLs give errors in SQL Server.
Any workaround on the DB end or in JDBC for this?
Thanks in advance,
Suresh
[email protected]

jschell wrote:
nichele wrote:
jwenting wrote:
If NULL really is different in your context from an empty string you're going to have to define some sequence of characters as indicating an empty string.yes, this is what i need to implement.Sounds like a flawed design then.
I'm wondering what's the best approach in order to avoid to change all my application isolating this behavior somewhere (wrapping the jdbc driver for instance).That doesn't make much sense to me. You should already have a database layer. You change the database layer. If you don't have a database layer then that means you have another design flaw. And in that case I would really not be the one that needs to maintain that code base.I thought a bit about the value of your answer...but i didn't find it ....sorry but i don't like who replies on forum just to say bad design/bad choice etc...if you have any kind of suggestion you are welcome, otherwise you can spend your time in doing something else instead of reply to this thread.

Error message "Tax code V1 does not appear in any G/L account item"

Hi,
I am getting the error message FF753- Tax code V1 does not appear in any G/L account item when I post a subsequent credit via miro.
It does not give the error with invoice or credit memo for the sames GL accounts.
History:
PO created
Goods receipt
Invoice posted and blocked as value greater than PO
Subsequent credit put on to correct the values in price query - error appears
I know if I go to FS02 and make the GL code * tax relevant it will remove the error but we dont want tax to go to this account as its a main inventory GL code.
Can anyone advise why it would appear on the subsequent credit but not on invoices or credits.
Also is there something I can set up to remove this issue apart from making the GL code tax relevant - it must not need it if the other postings work ok.
Thanks

Doesnt matter that it works for credits and invoices with blank tax you still need to put * in GL code for subsequent credit etc postings

Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item with FM Active

Hi
We have fund management configured for one of the company code, while creating billing document through VF01/VF02 we are getting the Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item.
This error however does not appear when posting directly from FI with the same tax code.
I have tried to change the message control in which case i am getting a dump pointing to PSM-FM.
Please advise.
Regards
Sandeep

Hi:
          If you could please refer to the contents of OSS Note 112609 - How are tax codes transferred to conditions ?
"Symptom
If a billing document is transferred to accounting the system displays error messages. Transferring tax codes from tax conditions into the pricing conditions and discounts does not function as expected.
Other terms
FF805, FF747, FF753, MWSKZ, MWSK1, tax code
Reason and Prerequisites
The tax condition in the SD pricing procedure contains incorrect reference steps, there are several tax conditions in the pricing procedure of which the tax codes overwrite each other or a program error exists.
Solution
In the accounting document for a billing document, the different G/L account line items are provided with a tax code. The tax code of the G/L accounts is transferred from the tax condition(s) of the billing document. How are the tax codes of the tax conditions transferred into the other conditions of a billing document ?
Basically:
The conditions of a billing document are read from top to bottom. As soon as an active tax (inactive = ' ') is read, the system transfers the tax code of this tax into the non-tax conditions as follows:
    1. The reference steps (From-step, To-step) are read (the reference steps are defined in the pricing procedure).
    2. The tax code is transferred into all conditions, for which
    the step number of the condition lies in the pricing procedure between "From-step" and "To-step",
    the condition is not inactive (exactly: the inactive flag is not equal to A (Condition exclusion), M (Inactive due to manual entry), or X (Incorrect)),
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition),
    the condition is no tax condition.
After the transfer of the tax code the system searches for the next active tax. If further taxes are found, their tax code is again transferred according to the above procedure. If the reference steps of different taxes overlap, tax codes that have already been transferred are overwritten. To all non-tax conditions which in the pricing procedure stand after the last tax condition the tax code of the last active tax condition is transferred if they are not statistical.
Special features:
    1. If the "From-step" of a tax condition refers to a subtotal of the pricing procedure, the tax code of the tax is not only transferred into the conditions with step number between From-step and To-step but into all non-tax conditions for which
    the step number of the condition in the pricing procedure is lower than the "To-step" of the tax condition.
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition).
    the condition is not a tax condition.
    2. If the "To-step" of the tax condition is smaller than the "From-step", then the system sets "To-step = From-step".
Notes:
    1. As of Release 4.0 the tax code is no longer transferred in pricing but only when the billing document is released to accounting.
    2. If you use several taxes and tax codes and Customizing is incorrect for the release of billing documents to accounting, among others the system may display error message FF747.
    3. If there are several taxes in the pricing procedure refer to Notes 72173 and 82091 for Releases 3.0D - 3.1G. For Release 3.1H, only note 82091 is relevant.
    4. For conditions which are transferred into accounting (thus not statistical, not inactive conditions) and do not contain a tax code, the system searches for a default tax code which in Accounting Customizing can be set depending on the company code (tax code for non-taxable transactions). This applies to releases up to and including Release 4.5B. For Release 4.6, refer to Note 385127."
Regards

Any Workaround to SORT ITEMS in a CATEGORY portlet ??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for