Apply MRU conditional execution

Hi!
I am using a tabular form and would like to update the rows (using ApplyMRU) only if two values in items P2_SUM_PLN and P2_FIKSNI_BR are equal.
I have tried by adding a condition to the process but it seems that the process does not fetch the values of the items.
e.g. Value of Item / Column in Exp 1 = Exp 2
Exp 1 = P2_FIKSNI_BR
Exp 2 = &P2_SUM_PLN.
The same condition works as a Dynamic Action.
The value of the number in P2_FIKSNI_BR is calculated via a SQL command, and the value of P2_SUM_PLN via a JavaScript.
Can anyone help me with this?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
I am not sure what kind of "Conditional Execution" you are looking for.
Syndication Server is based on the "Port" concept and we can associate an already saved Syndicator Map that also includes your Search criteria. So, the syndication server simply executes this map at a defined interval and places the file in the appropriate folder of the "Port". But, Syndication server cannot determine the map to be executed based on a condition and it also cannot determine search criteria within a map based on a condition.
If your requirement is to execute a map based on a condition, I suggest you to use "Syndicator Batch" commands and use a program that triggers appropriate map based on this condition.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Rajani

Similar Messages

Conditional Execution of Validation Rule defined in EO

Hi All
I'm developing a web application using jdeveloper 11.1.0.3
I have a drop down list with some values. There is a compare validation rule defined in EO object for an attribute. But I dont want to fire this validation only when a certain value from the drop down list is selected.
When we go to edit option of this validation rule there is a tsb called validation execution. I want to know how to fill conditional execution area to full fill my problem

You can create a Groovy expression in the 'Validation Execution' tab to return true based on which the validation rule will be applied. The new value of the attribute can be accessed via the attribute context validation variable 'newValue'
Check this blog for more details on validation rules:
http://blogs.oracle.com/workingwithadf/2010/11/adf-bc_business_rulesvalidation_eovo.html
hope this helps.
Regards,
~K

Hi in my sql query i applied like condition (like '%TEST') but it is taking long time

Hi in my sql query i applied like condition (like '%TEST') but it is taking long time. I applied indexes also,but still i'm facing the same problem. In my databse nearly 2,00,000 records their.

Hi Manikandan
Is there a difference in performance between running the query in BEx and WebI?
have you aggregates in place on the BEx side of things?
When you say its taking too long to open the report, have you a variable screen coming up for the report and is that what is taking the time or is it the report execution.
With regards
Gill

Is it possible to apply a condition on a single column?

Morning All,
Is it possible to apply a condition on a single column? My aim is to create a report that has multiple PTD columns, each based on a different Version ID.
I've tried creating a calculation using the case statement shown below, however I get a blank column with nothing in: CASE WHEN VERSION_ID = ‘10’ THEN BALANCES.PTD END
I know this can be done through a DB view/custom folder, however I’m looking for a solution that can be created in Desktop / Plus.
Cheers,
Lance

OK. Hope this explains the problem well.
This is the Crosstab Report without Annual Budget Column which looks great, all figures correct.
http://vodashare.com/show.php/2929_Pic1.jpg
After Adding Annual Budget column,
http://vodashare.com/show.php/2930_Pic2.jpg
This is the Table version of the above report with Annual Budget column
http://vodashare.com/show.php/2931_Pic3.jpg
Calculation Used for Annual Budget is
SUM(( CASE WHEN ( ( Actual Flag = 'B' ) AND ( Status <> 'C' ) )
THEN ( NVL(Period To Date Cr,0)-NVL(Period To Date Dr,0) )
ELSE 0 END ))
OVER(PARTITION BY Account,"Period Year" )
According to the conditions ( Actual Flag = 'B' ) AND ( Status <> 'C' ), amount is calculated adding the (Cr – Dr) amount when these conditions are satisfied. But, How can I make sure the value is displayed only for rows that these conditions are satisfied?
As you can see, it also displays the columns where Actual Flag != 'B' and Status = ‘C’
Also, I wonder why the Crosstab worksheet with Annual Budget doesn’t display some of the amounts (Ex: for Account 301010, no Annual Budget is displayed where as in Tabular worksheet it is $5721017.50) and for the amounts displayed, why are they displayed at different levels of Sub Accounts?
Note: I do get a warning when I Add the Annual Budget to worksheet.
'You are combining a detail data point with an aggregate data point This may give you unexpected results'. But I am not using any detail items as data points.(not considering Status and Actual Flag, got same message even after removing those)
Please let me know if you find a solution for your requirement Lance, that would help me.

Conditional execution of main DataTemplate

Hi All,
I am working on a Report in BI Publisher where the Data Model consists of three data sets of type-data template which are as below:
1) Before Trigger
2) Main DataTemplate
3) After Trigger
Now, I need to conditionally execute the main DataTemplate, depending on the return value of a function called in "Before Trigger". So, when function returns true, "Main DataTemplate" code is to be included in execution, and when it returns false we need only the code in "After Trigger" to be executed.
Please guide me in achieving the above.
Thanks
Actual Problem- Elaborated:-
In a report, first we need to check if the table used in code exists. In case it does, actual report is to be generated, and in case the table does not exist an error message is to be displayed as pdf output.
To achieve this we have a function in "Before Trigger" that returns true/false based on table's existence. Now we need to execute the report code depending on the outcome of this function.
For value = true, normal execution of report is to take place
For value = false, code of main datatemplate needs to be bypassed, and flow to "After Trigger" so as to avoid BI Publisher error "table or view does not exist".
The display of report/customised error message as output can be handled at the rtf level using sub-templates and if-else statements.
Please let me know in case you need some other details from my end.

Hi,
I am not sure what kind of "Conditional Execution" you are looking for.
Syndication Server is based on the "Port" concept and we can associate an already saved Syndicator Map that also includes your Search criteria. So, the syndication server simply executes this map at a defined interval and places the file in the appropriate folder of the "Port". But, Syndication server cannot determine the map to be executed based on a condition and it also cannot determine search criteria within a map based on a condition.
If your requirement is to execute a map based on a condition, I suggest you to use "Syndicator Batch" commands and use a program that triggers appropriate map based on this condition.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Rajani

Conditional execution of syndication server

I have a requirement for conditional execution of syndication server. Is it possible to automate syndication server to run based on a predefined search and Map. I know we can do using syndication client but can we do the same using syndication server. Thank you in advance.
Regards
Bala Pochareddy

Hi,
I am not sure what kind of "Conditional Execution" you are looking for.
Syndication Server is based on the "Port" concept and we can associate an already saved Syndicator Map that also includes your Search criteria. So, the syndication server simply executes this map at a defined interval and places the file in the appropriate folder of the "Port". But, Syndication server cannot determine the map to be executed based on a condition and it also cannot determine search criteria within a map based on a condition.
If your requirement is to execute a map based on a condition, I suggest you to use "Syndicator Batch" commands and use a program that triggers appropriate map based on this condition.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Rajani

How to apply two conditions in Suppress in Section Expert

Hi,
I need your help in applying to conditions in the Details section for the suppress in the Section Expert. My Report looks like:
Details A: {@SUM -DR}   {@SUM -CR}   {@SUM -Balance} {@TT-CLASS}
Details B: {Deal_No}   {Image_No}   {Amount}   {@Comments}
Currently, I am applying a condition to suppress both Details A and Details B in the section expert:
{@TT-CLASS}="OB"
Now while running the report, I got some duplicated deals ex:
123   1   1000   Reversal
123   1   1000   Reversal
124   2   2000   Approved
So I applied a condition in the section expert for the details A and B which is:
({Deal_No} = next({Deal_No} ) and {Image_No} =next( {Image_No} ) )
or
{@TT-CLASS}="OB"
And it is still giving me the duplicated deals when I am running the report. So can you please help.
Thanks

Duplicates are usually caused by an incorrect Join.
What is the datasource of the report - tables/views, stored procedures, sql query?
If you're reporting against tables/views, see if checking the 'select distinct records' option under the 'Database' menu helps.
-Abhilash

Subquery conditional execution using cbo

hellou
how i do for execute a subquery conditionally, using the cbo??
i got an example:
create table table1 AS
SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT 1 id, 'a' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 3 id, 'b' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 5 id, 'a' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 7 id, 'b' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 9 id, 'a' boss FROM dual
create index idx_table1 on table1(boss, id)
create table table2 AS
SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT 2 id, 'b' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 4 id, 'a' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 6 id, 'b' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 8 id, 'a' boss FROM dual
   union all
    SELECT 10 id, 'b' boss FROM dual
create index idx_table2 on table2(boss, id)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION print_hi
    isb in varchar2
return number
IS
BEGIN
    dbms_output.put_Line(isb);
    return 0;
END;
-- the query !!!!!!!
with data AS
    SELECT
    FROM (
        -- subquery #1
        SELECT
            1 query_name,
            id pibot,
            boss
        FROM table1
        WHERE print_hi(id) = 0
       union all
        -- subquery #2
        SELECT
            2 query_name,
            id pibot,
            boss
        FROM table2
SELECT
    pibot + query_name / 10 pibot
FROM data
WHERE 1 = 1
    AND boss = :boss
    AND (
        query_name = :q
        AND pibot > :p
       OR query_name > :q )
    AND rownum <= 3i want than only the query #2 be executed.
the query #1 print data in the screen when is executed (for the function print_hi).
now i execute the query with the variables data as:
boss = 'a'
q = 2
p = 0
when i execute the query using rules, then not print anything in the screen.
when i execute the query using costs, then print 1 5 9 in the screen. this means than the query #1 is being executed when this should not
help .. tx
SELECT * FROM v$version
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
CORE10.2.0.5.0Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production

As often is, the predicates section of the execution plan is quite revealing on this one.
Take your original query
explain plan for
with data AS
(SELECT *
FROM (-- subquery #1
       SELECT 1 query_name,id pibot,boss
       FROM table1
       WHERE print_hi(id) = 0
       union all
        -- subquery #2
       SELECT 2 query_name,id pibot,boss
        FROM table2))
SELECT pibot + query_name / 10 pibot
FROM   data
WHERE 1 = 1
AND    boss = :boss
AND   (query_name = :q
AND    pibot > :p
OR     query_name > :q )
AND    rownum <= 3;
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);gives
| Id | Operation           | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |            |     2 |    38 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | COUNT STOPKEY      |            |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   VIEW              |            |     2 |    38 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL        |            |       |       |            |          |
|* 4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_TABLE1 |     1 |    16 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_TABLE2 |     1 |    16 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter(ROWNUM<=3)
   4 - access("BOSS"=:BOSS)
       filter("PRINT_HI"(TO_CHAR("ID"))=0 AND (1>TO_NUMBER(:Q) OR
              1=TO_NUMBER(:Q) AND "ID">TO_NUMBER(:P)))
   5 - access("BOSS"=:BOSS)
       filter(2>TO_NUMBER(:Q) OR 2=TO_NUMBER(:Q) AND "ID">TO_NUMBER(:P))Assuming that the FILTER logic in STEP 4 is followed to order, it's not then possible with this query as is to short-circuit the evaluation of PRINT_HI as it is evaluated first.
When you make a change (just to q not necessarily to boss as well)
from
query_name = :qto
query_name = 2You'll hopefully notice the difference in predicate evaluation with the extra filter step:
| Id | Operation             | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |            |     2 |    38 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | COUNT STOPKEY        |            |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   VIEW                |            |     2 |    38 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    VIEW               |            |     2 |    38 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     UNION-ALL         |            |       |       |            |          |
|* 5 |      FILTER           |            |       |       |            |          |
|* 6 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_TABLE1 |     1 |    16 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_TABLE2 |     1 |    16 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter(ROWNUM<=3)
   5 - filter(1>TO_NUMBER(:Q))
   6 - access("BOSS"=:BOSS)
       filter("PRINT_HI"(TO_CHAR("ID"))=0)
   7 - access("BOSS"=:BOSS)
       filter("ID">TO_NUMBER(:P) OR 2>TO_NUMBER(:Q))

Apply "WHERE CONDITION" in "MASTER/DETAIL FORM" in "ORACLE APEX

Hi to all respected Gurus of this community.
I have a problem and I hope that there must be solution in this community and I am not aware of that till now.
I have a master/detail form in Oracle Application Express. Now, I want to apply a where condition in master-form to filter the data as per requirement but I cannot do so.
There is an option of "Modify Query" in "Query Definition". According to the instructions I am selecting the desired column (HR_Category) in left and providing text string 'M-9' in the right column to filter the data where HR_Category is M-9, and when I press apply changes, it gives me an error that
"1 error has occurred
The condition you are adding has caused the query to be invalid."
Please help how to proceed to apply a where condition.
Regards
Muhammad Uzair Awan
Oracle APEX Programmer
Pakistan

uzairmalik wrote:
Hi to all respected Gurus of this community.
I have a problem and I hope that there must be solution in this community and I am not aware of that till now.
I have a master/detail form in Oracle Application Express. Now, I want to apply a where condition in master-form to filter the data as per requirement but I cannot do so.
There is an option of "Modify Query" in "Query Definition". According to the instructions I am selecting the desired column (HR_Category) in left and providing text string 'M-9' in the right column to filter the data where HR_Category is M-9, and when I press apply changes, it gives me an error that
"1 error has occurred
The condition you are adding has caused the query to be invalid."
Please help how to proceed to apply a where condition.
Regards
Muhammad Uzair Awan
Oracle APEX Programmer
Pakistan
Probably a syntax error. Check the syntax of the new clause very carefully.
Can you post the query indicating which predicate is the new one? If you need to change the column and table names for confidentiality

How to apply Filter condition for a specific column but not to the report?

Hi,
I am having a issue in applying a filter condition to one of the column.
I have a schema with one fact table and around 10 dimension tables. My requirement is to bring a count on the fact table with related to some other columns from the dimension tables.
Lets consider a scenario with tables like Sales (Fact), Region (Dimension), Year(Dimension), Sale Type (Dimension).
Now my requirement is to bring out the fields
City(Region) --City
Year -- Year
Sales Count(Sales table) ---Count of all sales from the fact table
Sales Count(Sales table) -- Count of all sales from the fact table where sales type is 'CASH'
Here my issue is how do I apply the filter condition of Sales Type='CASH' only on one of the Sales Count column which is from the fact table. I want the filter condition to be imposed only for the fourth column.
Can anyone let me know how to achieve this?
Thanks

This is quite simpe. Edit the column formula for the 4th column and put something like this. I am doing this from memory so the syntax might need checking:
Case When "Dimension Table"."Sales Type"='CASH' Then "Fact Table"."Measure" Else Null End
You could also consider making this a permanent addition to your RPD if this measure will be used again and again. You would add a new logical column and use the expression builder to arrive at the same result.

Applying header Condition to Service lines in the PO

Dear All,
There is a requirement, not to apply certain header conditions for the service line items when there are both material and service lines in a PO.
Could you pls help me to find a solution for the above.
Tks
Sujith

Hi,
Any one of the following BADI's will be useful.
ME_PO_PRICING_CUST
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
ME_PURCHDOC_POSTED
Thanks & Regards,

Applying different condition in page process causes error in process source

hi -- I have a before header page process that essentially executes a custom fetch in order to populate a form from a report. The condition was previously
REQUEST != Expression1. This worked -- the form was populated when it was supposed to be (not on CREATE) but I need to change the condition to:
DECLARE
ind BOOLEAN;
BEGIN
if (:REQUEST not in ('CREATE','LOGOUT') or
(:REQUEST = 'LOGOUT' and :P122_DATATYPE_ID is NULL))
then
ind := TRUE;
else
ind := FALSE;
end if;
return (ind);
end;
I'm doing this as PL/SQL function body returning Boolean; I've tried other types also, they all result in the same problem:
When I try to apply the changes, they are not accepted. I get the error:
ORA-06550: line 8, column 7: PL/SQL: ORA-00903: invalid table name ORA-06550: line 3, column 2: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
I also got this error when my condition was a 1-line PL/SQL Expression; I'm pretty sure the error isn't referring to the condition... though when I change
the condition back to REQUEST != Expression 1, I can apply the changes.
The source is:
BEGIN
SELECT datatype_name, datatype_common_name, physical_quantity_name,
unit_id, allowable_intervals, agen_id, cmmnt
INTO :P122_datatype_name, :P122_datatype_common_name,
:P122_physical_quantity_name, :P122_unit_id,
:P122_allowable_intervals, :P122_agen_id, :P122_cmmnt
FROM &TABLE_NAME.@&DB_NAME.
WHERE datatype_id = :P122_datatype_id;
/* Send explicit message to user if this unusual case occurs. */
EXCEPTION
WHEN no_data_found THEN
raise_application_error (-20001, 'No row with datatype_id = '||:P122_DATATYPE_ID||'. Row appears to have been deleted by someone else.');
END;
I can't for the life of me figure out what the problem is. Can anyone out there spot it?
Thanks,
Carol

hi Scott -- Actually, the custom fetch process does work. It's been working for a long time. The primary key value is set from
the edit link on the report page, and fetch loads the data into the form. (DB_NAME and TABLE_NAME are set in eariler events.) I'm using the same process (with different page items, of course) on several report/form pages in the application. Actual data manipulation (insert,update,delete) won't work this way, but selects do.
But I can't apply changes to the condition.
I created this process in APEX 3.1, and it's running fine in APEX 3.2.1. But could the version have something to do w/ not being able to
apply the changes to the condition? Seems unlikely...
Carol

Conditionally apply AND condition

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE SP_TFS_REPORT (LoginId IN STRING,
status IN STRING,
fromAmount IN STRING DEFAULT NULL,
toAmount IN STRING DEFAULT NULL,
accNumber IN STRING,
result_cursor OUT SYS_REFCURSOR)
IS
BEGIN
OPEN result_cursor FOR SELECT * FROM TEST_TABLE T1
WHERE T1.LOGIN_ID = LoginId AND
T1.STATUS = status AND
T1.FROM_AMOUNT >= to_number(fromAmount) AND --This needs to be applied only if fromAmount paramter is not null*
T1.TO_AMOUNT <= to_number(toAmount) AND --This needs to be applied only if fromAmount paramter is not null*
T1.ACCOUNTNUMBER = accNumber;
COMMIT;
As you can see 'fromAmount' and 'toAmount' are optional paramters to the stored procedure. So the AND conditions corresponding to them need to be conditionally applied. In other words they need to be applied only when I get a NOT NULL value.
I know we can do this using IF ELSE condition but is there any efficient way to do this?
My DB details are:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
Thanks in advance for any help!!

Hi,
Sure, you can use CASE in a WHERE clause, but there's usually no benefit in doing so.
Why not
WHERE   T1.LOGIN_ID     = LoginId
AND     T1.STATUS      = status
AND     T1.FROMAMOUNT      >= nvl ( to_number (l_fromAmount1)
                           , T1.FROMAMOUNT
AND     T1.FROMAMOUNT   <= nvl ( to_number (l_fromAmount2)
                            , T1.FROMAMOUNT
AND     T1.ACCOUNTNUMBER = accNumber; ?
This assumes t1.fromamount is not NULL.
It looks like you've changed your requirements: earlier, you were interested in t1.from_amount and t1.to_amount, and now only t1.fromamount.

Sqlplus and conditional execution

I would like to write a sql script in which:
if there is a table TAB1
then compile a PROCEDURE
else exit without errors.
The script must be executed using SQL*Plus.
Can I do that?

Hi,
Yes, you can do that. It's not very elegant, however.
See this thread:
Re: Conditional Exit from the script

Doubt about apply PATCH 10.1.2.3 in middleware tier after apply mrua 10.1.4

Hello Gurus,
Can i apply middle tier patch 10.1.2.3 in PORTAL(middleware) after apply MURA 10.1.4 in Infraestructure tier?
Best regards,
Thiago Leôncio

Thiago,
My first response, although correct, may have caused some confusion. I was under the assumption that you had installed a 10.1.4 SSO repository which for IM 10.1.4.x. This repository ships with 10.1.2.0.2 Portal. But from the information in this thread, it seems that you want to patch a Portal midtier with the 10.1.2.3 patch while the Portal repository is still 10.1.4.0.0.
The AS 10.1.2.3 patch set contains two sorts of patches:
1. Patches for the Oracle 10.1.2.x Application Server binaries and libraries. These are copied to the file system when applying the patch set
2. Patches to upgrade the Portal repository. These PL/SQL packages are installed in the Portal repository database.
In order to patch a 10.1.2.0.2 environment with Portal, the Universal Installer of the patch set needs to be run three times in this specific order :
1. Update the binaries/libraries of the Portal 10.1.2.x midtier
2. Update the binaries/libraries of the Identity Management 10.1.2.x midtier.
3. Upgrade the Portal and Wireless repository to either 10.1.2.3 or 10.1.4.
You can install the binary/libraries to both the Portal midtier and Identity Management midtier without running the repository upgrade immediately. This option is available for large scale deployments where the upgrade of the midtiers / identity management and the repository upgrade is spread over two downtime periods. This should however always be a temporary arrangement, it is not intended for production purposes. So to answer your question :
No, you can upgrade your Portal midtier to 10.1.2.3 without patching the Portal repository to 10.1.4.2 or 10.1.2.3 unless it is a temporary arrangement to accommodate for small downtime windows.
Note :
As mentioned before, the Portal repository upgrade part of the 10.1.2.3 patch set behaves different pending on the repository version :
All 10.1.2.x repositories are upgraded to 10.1.2.3
All 10.1.4.x repositories are upgraded to 10.1.4.2
Hope this helps,
EJ

Apply MRU conditional execution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for