Arduino ino with custom libraries

Hi,
I'm trying to compile an arduino sketch using ino. I'm also using a custom library called TimerOne which I've installed to ~/sketchbook/libraries and even the normal arduino IDE is able to link and compile it.
But if I try to build it with ino, it keeps telling me this:
user@host$ ino build
src/sketch.cpp
.build/uno/src/sketch.cpp:3:22: error: TimerOne.h: No such file or directory
src/sketch.ino: In function ‘void setup()’:
src/sketch.ino:41: error: ‘Timer1’ was not declared in this scope
.build/uno/Makefile:189: recipe for target '.build/uno/src/sketch.o' failed
make: *** [.build/uno/src/sketch.o] Error 1
Make failed with code 2
Then I tried to copy the TimerOne library directly to the lib folder of my ino-project, which didn't help.
I also tried to specify the lib folder using "ino build -d ~/sketchbook/libraries/" but it failed too.
I've read the documentation and help files of ino, but I can't figure out how to tell ino to use the library correctly.
I'm a little bit confused, does anybody know what I'm doing wrong?

Except that it does not appear in my "User Defined" option, hence the reason for me trying to find it in "Other Libraries." Sorry I did not explain that. That's why I'm bothered by this. This is very unusual.

Similar Messages

Deploy with custom libraries

Hi
I'm trying to test/deploy my application. In the application I use a custom library for logging (log4j).
I have successfully included the library in the Model and used in the code.
The code compile but when i try to deploy in the integrated weblogic server i get this error:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.log4j.Logger
I'm missing some step to include the custom library during the deploy?
thanks

@Shay Shmeltzer: Thanks for the help, I was searching for this option in the application properties.
@Duncan Mills: I know ADF Logger it's more integrated with the weblogic enviroment. I was told to use log4j and i must stick with this choice.

Create Document Set with custom Create Only permission set

Here is the situation. We have a requirement where my customer wants to create document sets, however, document set/document level permissions are required.
Setup: We created a new permission level called "Create Only". We then give the user Read and Create only permissions. This allows the user to theoretically create the item. We then run a Workflow on create that Replaces the permissions so that
you are only allowed to view the ones you created along with other security groups based on their choices in the metadata fields.
This setup works PERFECTLY when using a List or Form Library.
However, for the life of me I cannot get it to work for Document Sets. If I have the same setup, I get an Access Denied message. However, it still creates the document set.
What is weird, I've been playing around with custom permission levels and it seems as though the user has to have EDIT permissions at a minimum in order to create the document set. This will not work for me since I dynamically assign permissions to each
document set based on what they select.
As a side note, the only tool I have at my disposal is SharePoint Designer 2010.
Does anyone know if there is an actual requirement to have EDIT permissions when creating a Document Set? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Alternatively, is there a way to setup permissions on a library for all NT Authenticated users so that we can give them the necessary permissions to create the Document Set, but still prevent them from see the other items and then the Workflow would set
the permissions accordingly?
I believe the more granular the permissions it uses those permissions instead so would this work? I have not tested this theory yet.

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to know if there is an actual requirement to have EDIT permissions when creating a Document Set and is there a way to setup permissions on a library for all NT Authenticated users and prevent
them from seeing items created by others.
For the first question, per my knowledge, if a user is given the Add Items permission, he/she can create a document set in SharePoint.
However, there is an error “access denied” after the document set is created. It is due to the user has no permission to access the page which SharePoint will redirect the user to after finishing creating the document set.
If the user is also given Edit Items permission, there will be no error when he/she create a document set.
For the second question, I recommend to follow the link below to
customize item permissions for each document submitted to a document library and remember to give the
NT Authenticated users contribute permission.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/spke/archive/2010/04/09/configure-item-level-permissions-for-document-libraries-sharepoint-2010-edition.aspx
To grant permission to NT Authenticated users, please refer to the link below:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/sharepoint-server-help/what-happened-to-add-all-authenticated-users-HA101805183.aspx
Best regards.
Thanks
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Link java class with custom taglib in Nitrox

Hi,
I am creating a set of Nitrox custom libraries for my company, and I need a tag with the following behavior:
The tag insert window has to contain a select combo with information retrieved from a file or a database.
So, my questions are:
1) How can I call java classes from tlei or tagedit files?
2) What does it mean the following tag?
<editor-class>com.m7.wide.struts.tags.tagedit.StrutsSelectTagEditor</editor-class>
3) What does it mean this other tag?
<default-bundle>com.m7.wide.struts.resources.html-resources</default-bundle>
4) Do you have any online documentation about tagedit files and the related classes?
I am using Eclipse 3.1 and Nitrox 3.0.0 M2
Thanks in advance,
Alberto

The Workshop Java API for tag customization is not public for the time being, sorry for the inconvenience.

About providing FLA with required libraries?

I'd like to give someone else the FLA to recompile SWF's, but the libraries I'm using are spread out in many places (Tween libraries, custom libraries, etc), and would be somewhat arduous to package cleanly to include with the FLA. Does anyone know of a slick & easy way to compile the imported libraries into the FLA somehow?

probably not. i assume whoever you're sending this to needs to edit it. if they need to use the code in those other classes, they'll have trouble if it's precompiled in a swc.

Custom Libraries sadly needed in iTunes

Custom Libraries: iTunes can be greatly improved if the user could create different libraries, instead of all the song being lumped into one large library to develop playlists from. That way iTunes would not become confused with song that labelled Track_1 etc... and screw up your playlists, and iTunes would not lost track of which tracks belong with which playlists. The user would have more control over how to customize iTunes. It's really dumb to force all the tunes into one large cumbersome error prone library. You label each library based on the content, and know where the songs in that library originated much better than the current design.

Oliver,
I think your ideal solution would be to get yourself an iPod and then just keep all you music on the external drive.
Short of that you could try iTunes Library Manager. It's not quite the functionality you seek but might be useful.
Finally, you could choose to not have iTunes keep your Music Folder organized and not copy songs to the Music Folder when you add them to your Library.
This way your Library could be split between the two drives but still all show up in iTunes. I think this option would be kind of a pain to maintain though. Especially when you move something from the external to the iBook. You'd have to manually find it for iTunes after it's moved so it would know where to look.
Matt

How do I add URI web link with custom tooltip like "CLICK HERE TO UPDATE" instead of URI web link in tooltip.

How do I add URI web link with custom tooltip like "CLICK HERE TO UPDATE" instead of URI web link in tooltip.

You've probably found an answer to this by now, but I think this has been addressed in another forum -- The link below suggested using a button and adding the tooltip to the button.
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/304974?start=0&tstart=0
Sounds like it would work but I haven't actually tried it.
Good luck~!

Is there a way to create a project with custom audio settings that are NOT only "Stereo" or "Surround"?

Is there a way to create a project with custom audio settings that are NOT only "Stereo" or "Surround"?
Thanks!
-Adrian

the old apps are on my computer but they have had upgrades since they were put on the ipod originally. you think you would get a warning about this when you restored. I was not worried about losing the progress of the apps but i would have been worried about the app it self!!!!!

Anyone know how to contact anyone in Verizon headquarters? Since I'm not getting anywhere with Customer Service

I'd like to express how unsatisfied we have been with Verizon on an issue that has been ongoing now since March 14, 2014. It involves an upgrade on one of our lines. After all these months, phone call with customer service, Tech support, and visits to a Verizon stores, I would hope that there are ample notation on our acct but since I've had to explain the situation on a bi-weekly time frame, I would assume that no one has documented any contacts.
We've been with Verizon for few yrs now and I have always been very satisfied with Verizon who, up until now , always provided excellent customer service in their knowledge, concern, and customer satisfaction. But I have to say, every positive outlook I've had with your company has been wiped clean with the worst service we have received in the last few months.
We upgraded my daughter's phone on 03-14-14 with a Samsung Galaxy Mini from an Iphone 4s. Within 24 hrs, the phone failed. After 2 visits to a Verizon store the next day which took 6 hrs, we still had to return the next day to speak to a manager. The 2 stores advised us to make a CLAIM on the defective phone thru our insurance plan with Verizon. A CLAIM on a 24 hr old phone!! A 3rd visit with a manager finally convinced him to replace the phone with another new phone at the store. Within 2 weeks - issues began to occur with the replacement phone. Several visits more, several calls more with Customer Service, several calls more with tech support which adds up to soooo many of our time taken up to simple have temporary "fixes" is outrageous. If I billed Verizon for my time, perhaps the situation would have been resolved more quickly. Each visit lasts approx 2 hrs, each phone call approx 1-1 1/2 hrs. We are talking at least 2x a month for the course of 5 1/2 months. Plus the time it takes to get the phone back to where she needs it - contacts, apps, internet.
Not once were we offered a new phone or replace the phone. Not until today. Replace the phone with the same phone that my daughter has grown to hate. So basically a 3rd phone - same phone. She is not interested in this phone any longer. She dealt with this phone model for far too long.
Today we were offered to replace the phone with same phone, or pay for a refurbished Iphone 4. So basically she would be going back to her original Iphone 4s before the upgraded WITH a cost. So her upgrade was wasted, we'd paid over $200 for a defective phone, and would need to pay for an even older model Iphone 4 and have to pay for it. Why wasn't she offered a different phone within those 30 days after the upgrade and 6 visits?
Every rep at the stores, every rep in tech support would provide a different reason for the issue. Finally, tech support advised not to download apps. WHAT GOOD IS A SMARTPHONE IF YOU CAN'T HAVE APPS??? We are talking about a 20 yrs college student who attends school in another state. Do you know the trouble she has to go thru to visit a store? To find 2 hrs between being a full time student with 2 jobs to sit on the phone with a tech support or go to a Verizon store? Once-ok Twice-maybe BUT for 5 months?
She's not eligible for an upgrade. She will be stuck with a phone that she had grown to hate. And I with customer service which I've grown to hate.
Finally, The Edge. Trying to find a way to make my daughter happy, I spoke with 4 representative today about the Edge. Each rep gave me 4 different information. 1st rep advised Edge phone could not be used on another line so I could not use a line eligible for the Edge and give that phone to my daughter since she isn't eligible for the Edge. 2nd rep advised that although new phone thru edge must be used by same number that it was eligible for, we could use the current phone o that line for my daughter. My son currently has an Iphone 5 and is eligible for the Edge early upgrade. He would not have to return his Iphone 5 so my daughter could use it. However, all the lines would have to go to the More Everything Plan and share the Data between all our phone lines. 3rd rep advised the cost would almost double from our current $358 to go to the More Everything Plan so suggested to have 2 accounts vs just 1. 4th rep advised not every line needs to go the More Everything Plan, we could not keep the current phone, and my daughter could get a replacement phone but same phone or made exception to offer the Edge early upgrade to my daughter but only after we go thru the replacement program because the phone we send to Verizon has to be in good working order/no defects.
After 5 1/2 months, it is now Verizon that is indicating that we have a defective phone and can't accept it thru the Edge program or we would get billed approx $299 for a defective phone. After 5 1/2 months of me calling in about a defective phone that not one rep replaced because they "fixed" the problem ( by the way, a temporary fix is not fixing, if it was fixed I would have made those calls today or writing this email), I am now being told her phone is defective. She advised to get a replacement phone first, return the old phone, activate the new phone, then call in to get the Edge early upgrade. So my daughter would have to do all this, plus add contacts back, apps and whatever else she needs to use her phone just to turn around a couple weeks later and do it all over again with the new phone thru the Edge program. Once again, we are the ones having to be inconvenienced and go thru all these steps. Did I mention she is going to be studying abroad in Italy beginning Nov? So the idea of having to wait 2-3 weeks for a new phone and having only a week or 2 to test the phone to make sure it's working properly before she's out of the country doesn't sound appealing to me. Verizon has made us have a defective phone for 5 months advising it's in good working order after each and every "fix" but Verizon will not accept that phone if returned in the same condition as a phone in good working condition. Do you see the irony in that?
I have reached my limit and after 5 yrs of my brother in law trying to convince us to switch to AT&T where he works in their Corporate Office, I can honestly say I will not be sad to leave Verizon. Especially when one of your reps simply provided me with the contract end dates to provide to AT&T because they offered to buy out our contract. No effort in customer retention what so ever. That was a phone call on Thursday.
And yes, one of your tech reps tried to convince me of all the hassle it would be to switch and time AT&T would take to buy out our contracts but honestly it was the pot calling the kettle. I am not in the position to discuss hassle and time after 5 months of getting that with Verizon. Did I mention it's my brother in law so we would be getting special treatment and no out of pocket expenses to switch. It was my loyalty and satisfaction with Verizon that has kept me from switching all these years. Something Verizon clearly does not appreciate.
So can you guess where I am with confidence that your customer service department is knowledgable about the plans/offers? Where I am that I can trust what I'm being told?
I know this email is confusing and really hard to understand...perhaps now you will know how i've been feeling--lost and confused with all the mis-information, with a hit and miss phone, and out of time with all the 1 1/2 hr to 2 hrs EACH wasted on this issue.
On top of all this, I can't even find out how to file a complaint with anyone higher up than Customer Service.

Jneklason wrote:
~snip~
I know this email is confusing and really hard to understand...perhaps now you will know how i've been feeling--lost and confused with all the mis-information, with a hit and miss phone, and out of time with all the 1 1/2 hr to 2 hrs EACH wasted on this issue.
On top of all this, I can't even find out how to file a complaint with anyone higher up than Customer Service.
I hate to tell you this, but you didn't write an email. You wrote a discussion post on the Verizon Wireless Community forum which is a public peer to peer forum. Unfortunately since you didn't mark your post as a question, the VZW reps that roam this community won't ever see your post. Before you re-post it, don't. Duplicate posts get removed from the community.
I see there were several missteps both by the reps and yourself in your post. First you should have insisted on returning the phone within the 14 day return policy period. Second which Samsung Galaxy mini model did you purchase? The S3 mini or the S4 mini? Did you do any research prior to deciding on this device. The reps at that time deflected the easiest course of action, by trying to get you to replace the phone under insurance instead of returning the phone. The Early Edge payment option requires the current phone on the line using the early Edge must be returned to Verizon Wireless. Did you once considered going to a third party site like Swappa to purchase a gently used device for your daughter?

WP8 Map control with custom tiles

I'm trying to display a map control in my app targeting Windows Phone 8 but I want to use custom tiles from open street map.
I'm using this line :
mapControl.TileSources.Add(new TileSource("http://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/{zoomLevel}/{x}/{y}.png"));
When I launch the app the custom tiles are properly displayed, but there's still the default map tiles underneath them.
I tried to hide them, but I counld'nt even find where they exist in the map control and what is displaying them exactly.
I would like to know how I can remove those default tiles when loading custom tiles.
I tried to hide them, but I counld'nt even find where they exist in the map control and what is displaying them exactly.

Hi MakanWG,
You have solved your question in here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27948331/wp8-map-control-with-custom-tiles .
Good!
Vote if help you

How to clear vendor open items with customer open items in APP?

Hi Experts,
Our vendor is our customer - in this scenario how to clear vedor open items against customer open items. I have defined vedor is customer means I have given customer number in vendor master record, selected chek box 'clear with customer'. Still problem is not solved, hence I am requesting you to help me in this regard.
Thank you very much,
Regards,
Ganesh.

Hi
In FBCJ after payment you have clear manually vendor balance in F-44.
If you want SPL GL in FBCJ then write a Substitution .
1. step 001 - Special G/L Substitution
2. Prerequisite - Transaction code = 'FBCJ'
3. Substitution posting key -- Exit (need help from abap) exit name
G/L Exit (need help from abap) exit name
Special G/L Ind Exit (need help from abap) exit name
you can't do this without ABAP help
Best Of Luck
Tanmoy

Line item report with Customer number

Hi all,
I am facing the following issue:
I need a line item report to analyze an accrual account by customer.
Since the customer is not captured on the accrual account itself, but on the recon. account (which is not defined as line item display), I did not find a way to present the customer and the accrual on the same line.
I can always go to BSEG and vlookup and match by document number the accrual account and the customers from the customer recon. account, but I thought maybe someone has a better idea.
Thanks,
Yoel.

If the recon account line items have al lthe info needed I'd suggest using a query (SQ01).
1. Create an Infoset in SQ02 with logical database "BRM". Choose the fields from BSEG that you need
2. Create the Query in SQ01 using that Infoset.
If you want to see individual line items, include the fields you want in the "basic list" of the query. If you want totals by customer, don't include anything in the basic list, but make a "statistics" with customer and amount.
Selections would habe to be made for account no and period.

Error while trying to Execute the Query with Customer Exit

Hi Experts,
I am having a Query with Customer Exit, it is working fine for all the Employess, except for one. When i try to remove the Customer Exit it is working for her too. Below is the error i am getting.
system error in program SAPLLRK0 and form RSRDR; CHECK_NAV_INIT_BACK
Thanks,
Kris.

Hello Kris,
Are you working with multiprovider? Please check if OSS notes 813454,840080 or 578948 are applicable in your case.
Regards,
Praveen

I reached my 1000th hour logged on the phone with customer service

I've been using Verizon jetpacks for 9 months now. Seemed like a sweet deal. Prepaid. Convenient. Fast and reliable. WRONG! I logged my 1000th hour on the phone with customer service today after a 5 hour "troubleshooting" session, second one this week. I've been having to make this exact 5 hour phone call every week sometimes up to 4x per week. I've never spent less than 3 hours on the phone or gone more than 4 days without having to contact customer "service." Naturally, this is pretty ignorant sounding. But, I paid $100 for a significantly small amount of data. I prepaid to be exact. For a service to be rendered one must be able to receive the service paid for. That's simply not the case. I paid $100 for this data already and can't actually use it with any convenience. Unless of course, 5-20 per week on the phone with customer service is typical of any other company. Other than Virgin Mobile, No. It's in fact an extremely absurd amount time for ANY customer to spend on the phone with ANY customer service. No exception. I feel rather abused, used and ****** over by this so call "service". I lost 6 clients. They all sued me in small claims for $3000 each for failing to maintain my end due to my weekly dose of hours on the phone with customer service and NOT doing the job I was employed to do. Nope. Instead, I spent my time with Verizon Customer Service and COURT! Yay! So, I've lost my home, my car was repo'd, $18k loss, 6 customers... and not one time has Verizon spent one second and said to me "Verizon could be the problem"... NEVER has that been the case in all 1000 hours logged. Interesting? No. Just abusive. I resent having to call customer service at all any more. It's even causing my mental health to suffer after all this. You know what is found every time? I'm on a prepaid plan on a device customer service told me to purchase. But wait... thats the second device. Every week I'm told The OTHER device is the one that works with this plan... then a few days later, no that other device is the one that works with the plan, a few days later... The OTHER DEVICE IS THE ONE THAT WORKS.. FFS. See a pattern? I've been directed by Verizon to replace my device 3 times, at $100+ per device plus the $10 sim card, plus the 5 hours on the phone with them every few days. I'd say there's an issue with customer service. First, yes it IS possible there is an issue on YOUR end. I'm pretty sure that having to buy a new device every time I call isn't really the best answer. Second, for the extremely limited amount of data I can't afford to watch a video for fear of capping my data before the end of the 30 days because its 10gig of data. Yeah, 2 whole movies worth! Third, its possible to be wrong, yet Verizon has never, not one single time chose to check their end. ALWAYS and ONLY my end. I don't find that surprising or ironic, I find it the most ignorant and worst customer service in existence only second to Virgin Mobile. Virgin mobile did finally acknowledge the issue was in the broken tower nearby. It took them 6 months and yes... 100's of hours on the phone. Verizon hasn't made any effort to accept responsibility for this issue. I'm sure they are very sincere when they are consuming my 5 hours per phone call trouble shooting my device for the third time this week. It's actually to the point where they have violated their terms of service and failed to look into an issue on their end. The tower has been hit. Hmmm... Ironic. Its quite a distance from here, but is a main tower that has caused an outage across my state. Verizon couldnt tell me that? Is that admitting your wrong so hard to do that it's easier to spend 5 hours on the phone trouble shooting my device than 5 mins looking for outages? Yeah, it could have saved my house and job, but I'm the customer... clueless idiot at the mercy of a company who is never wrong nor makes an effort to correct an issue on their end before stealing my hours from me. At one point, I actually fell asleep in my 2nd hour on hold. Customer service? Nope, a waste. I could dig it if this issue was on my end, but I'm confident that spending up to 20 hours a week troubleshooting to no avail is a HUGE red flag that its not on my end after all. Only cost me a house, a job, car and $18k plus court costs and fees. Fair? Nope. But it would be nice if just ONCE there was an initiative to provide actual support to a customer. I KNOW if this is my experience it is impossible to be an isolated incident with me alone. If I'm tying up 5 hours on the phone, what is the next guy doing? waiting to trouble shoot his box for the next 5 hours over a downed tower. Pride is what that is. People too proud to be wrong at someone else's expense. Definitely an issue if I've paid $900 in 9 months and I spent more hours on the phone with customer service than I have online. Pretty ******. Verizon, you ARE WRONG. Owning it would save the embarrassment of having to ***** about it on this site. I didnt' deserve my losses and it was at my expense and it is STILL at my expense that I'm having to contact that 888-294-6804 number. I've got it memorized like it was my best friends number - that's how often and how many times i've used it. Shame how simple it would be if Verizon wasn't so ******* proud and spent a few moments looking for issues on their end before stealing 5 hours from me doing the obvious over and over and over again... Small claims can be used to sue up to $3k. Looks like that's my only alternative, perhaps if I do that maybe checking for issues on their end will occur instead of pretending its impossible. It feels like I went to mcd's and paid for a meal at the window that took 5 hours to get a bag of raw patties thrown at me from inside after sitting at the window for 5 hours and waiting. I'm wrong of course. I'm am the customer. How could I possibly be right? I've troubleshooted my device over 1000 times. Of course its on my end. Must be.... 1000 times isn't enough to find out there's a potential issue that isn't related to my specific device, no? Is it gonna take 1000 more hours on the phone before one of the representatives decide to look for an outage before the 5 hours of daily trouble shooting? Thats a huge red flag that just keeps getting ignored. I can't think of any other companies besides these two internet providers that finds that acceptable. Better Business Bureau didn't. I'll be filing that complaint with them next. High time Verizon stepped off such a prideful pedestal and seek a remedy before a class action suit sinks them in the future from all other raging bitches not being provided with reasonable service. It's not a rant, this has been a life shattering experience for me and a simple quick check for an issue on their end could have prevented it. BAD BAD BAD Customer service policies to keep a customer on the phone for that length of time to repetitiously check the exact same thing repeatedly every few days. Disgusted. How dare that term "service" even be used if they can't provide "service" via support or otherwise. I'm on the internet finally after 10 hours and the news reported the Verizon tower down. Not verizon... A police officer interviewed on a Detroit News station instead. God knows police have nothing better to do in Detroit than make news appearances for verizon.

Simple solution. Get a real internet service and not a cell phone internet connection service it was never meant to be used as the primary internet service
And how do you lose a home and job and be sued as you claim. What over 10 Gb of data? Give me a break
In my city small claims is $5000.00
And over that amount you can go to a superior court to have your issue settled.
http://www.bbb.org
Good Luck, Elector

Runtime error - FBL1N - vendor balance with customer line item

Hi gurus,
One scenario where i have assign vendor as customer & customer as vendor in vendor & customer data. also make tick mark for both clearing with vendor & customer.
when i see the customer report with vendor item it shows me the customer & vendor dues but when i tried to see the vendor balance with customer line item it gives dump error.
Runtime Errors         PERFORM_NOT_FOUND
Exception              CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FORM
Error analysis
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FORM', was
     not caught in
    procedure "%_LDB_CALLBACK" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    The program "RSDBRUNT" is meant to execute an external PERFORM,
    namely the routine "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " of the program "RFITEMAP ", but
    this routine does not exist.
    This may be due to any of the following reasons:
    1. One of the programs "RSDBRUNT" or "RFITEMAP " is currently being developed.
    The name "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " of the called routine may be incorrect, or
    the routine "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " is not yet implemented in the program "RFITEMAP
    2. If the program SAPMSSY1 is involved in the runtime error, one of
    the function modules called via RFC is not flagged as remote-capable.
    (see Transaction SE37 Goto -> Administration -> RFC flag)
    3. There is an inconsistency in the system. The versions of the
    programs "RSDBRUNT" and "RFITEMAP " do not match.
Warm regards,
Dhananjay R.

Hi martin
still problem was not solved. actually i am working on ECC 6.0 & not required to implement the sap note on development. i had done the configuration in vendor master & customer master for clearing.
please suggest me.....what to do ?
Than'x
Dhananjay R

Arduino ino with custom libraries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for