Arrear Amount Not adding in Total Earning

Dear All,
When we are generating pay slip by PC00_m40_cedt and with simulation PC00_M40_Calc_SIMU then Stat.net subs.adjustment
i.e. /552 component is not adding in Total Earning field , please help from where we can also show that amount in Total Earning field.
Regards
Vivek Sharma

Check whether it is coming in Window Earnings side in payslip.......If it is displying in window but it is not adding in total earnings then problem with cumulation IDs....How you have added in WIndow and Cumulation IDs.
Goto PE51....Select Window and double click on Group.add lile below...
Sgr                table       ID         Text                 Pty    Cty      DiffRel
01             RT         /552      XXXXXX               01      X               *      ( Note Use proper line type)
Cumulation IDs....click on Earning ID ex IN01......double click on IN01 and add....
RT           /552           XXXXXX            + (MS)      * (DSplit)

Similar Messages

  • Arrears amount not getting added to /559

    Dear Experts,
    We want to pay September’14 arrears, September’14 Leave Salary and October’14 salary to the employee.
    In system arrears and leave salary is calculated correctly also wage types are displaying in payslip as well as in RT tabel.
    But in T-code pc_payresult arrear  and leave salary amount is not getting added to the /559.
    Amount showing in /559 is only October’14 salary.
    We have checked all the processing classes and cumulation classes for all the wage types.
    Need your help to resolve this issue.
    We have attached screen shot for your reference.
    Thanks !!!!

    When talking about a Payroll problem, it is always useful to indicate what Country code is involved since Payroll may not work the same for all Countries.
    Your screen capture does not enable us to identify what WTs cumulate in /101 (Total gross), but if I substract /110 (Net deductions) from it the result is nearly the sum of /559 (Payment), which looks OK (the difference may be a WT that does not cumulate in /101 but impacts /559).
    Use t-code PC00_M99_DLGA20 to confirm if WTs 1003 and 4003 cumulate in /101.
    Are WTs 1003 and 4003 considered "Information WTs" for payments that must be done at a later date?

  • Copy of WT MD60 'Arrears Recovery' not clearing Ded. WT amount from ARRS

    Since I can't search only the Threads in HCM I will have to make my own question.  Hope soemone has run into this before.
    Using US Payroll, copy of schema QP00, we have 2 situations with deductions in arrears that I have not found a working solution.
    1)  How do we clear (throw away) amounts in ARRRS table from deductions on an employee terminated years ago?  When they return to us as an Active employee the payroll run applies those deductions in arrears, as it should.  But if we want to forgive those, what can we do so those old arrears amounts are cleared on the employee's first payroll?
    2)  When an employee on LWOP returns, (and new deductions are being taken that already have amounts in ARRRS) we want to place them on a repayment plan to gradually repay the arrears.
    Even though I made customer copies of WTs MD60, MD70, MD80, MD90 at the same time (for each deduction WT we place in arrears), and verified all the links in T51P1, and Prc Class settings; the payroll run still takes as much net pay as needed to clear those arrears.  And will take the repayment deduction (copy of MD80) from IT 14 as well!!!  So the arrears are cleared, but sadly only from the employee's net pay.
    I also have a Balance WT and Recovery WT in IT 15, as directed in all the SAP documentation I can find.  And the link to the actual deduction (a copy of WT MD50), that was placed in ARRRS to begin with, is in place on T51P1 as well.  The repayment deduction WT does correctly reduce the Balance WT (copy of MD70) and creates the Total WT (copy of MD90) with the correct amount during the Payroll run.
    I am not fluent in PCRs, but have extensive ABAP skills, and if I had to guess what is wrong, it would appear that something is not right in one or more of the delivered PCRs in the UDP0 schema.  And most likely the URRS PCR, since it looks like that's what processes the MD60 WT copy.
    Any advice from someone who's had similar situations, and resolved that, would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Mark

    Frederic's right... you're summing up too many statspacks ..
    Can't see anything specific apart from the fact that Statspack itself is showing up in the top statements.
    First : define 'Slow' . What is your goal for 'Ok' ?
    Start thinking about sql_trace, tkprof and 10046 traces

  • Totals for Groups not adding

    Hello,
    I created a report for our Scheduling team here and I thought it was working nicely and someone found  that my totals are not adding up.
    In the Group Header Reset I have:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    Shared NumberVar PastDue :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day1Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day2Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day3Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day4Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day5Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day6Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day7Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day8Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day9Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar Day10Value :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay1 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay2 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay3 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay4 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay5 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay6 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay7 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay8 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay9 :=0;
    Shared NumberVar SDay10 :=0;
    Day 1 Values  (Day1Value should hold totals, but it's only holding the last value it seen, Detail Section)
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    Shared NumberVar Day1Value;
    if IsNull({V_SHIP_SCHED.DAY_1}) then 0
    else {V_SHIP_SCHED.DAY_1};
    Day1Value := {V_SHIP_SCHED.DAY_1} + Day1Value;
    Day 1 Totals (Group Footer Section)
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    Shared NumberVar Day1Value;
    Day1Value;
    Not sure why it's happening.  Any ideas?

    Okay found out my Totals in the Group Footer are working, it's just in the detail not working.
    When I do this:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    Shared NumberVar Day1Value;
    if IsNull({V_SHIP_SCHED.DAY_1}) then 0
    else {V_SHIP_SCHED.DAY_1};
    Day1Value := {V_SHIP_SCHED.DAY_1} + Day1Value;
    it printing out the First line amount being correct but the next line it's adding the first line with the second line and giving it total
    ie:  Customer 1 - Day 1 = 100
         Customer 2 - Day 1 = 200
    Then when printing it doing this:
                             Day 1
    Customer 1     100
    Customer 2     300
    Total               300
    What I need to do this:
                             Day 1
    Customer 1     100
    Customer 2     200
    Total               300
    Thanks.

  • Total balance amount not displayed correctly

    i have shown my table below my problem is that the balance amount being displayed on form displays the total balance amount and total balance amount being displayed is the sum of all balance amount,hence the final total which iget at the end is incorrect and a huge amount,, while balance amount should be equal to expected amount and total balance amount should be total of all balance amount..less any payments made by the client..
    i have displayed below only the part of script...
    htp.listHeadOpen;
         htp.listHeader('Date',null);
         htp.listHeader('Min',null);
        htp.listHeader('Units',null);
         htp.listHeader('Tx Prof',null);
         htp.listHeader('Prog',null);
         htp.listHeader('Activity Code <img src="/images/cl2_help.gif" ALT="Activity Code Display" height="16" width="16" border="0">',null);
         htp.listHeader('Location',null);
         htp.listHeader('Payor',null);
         htp.listHeader('Auth#',null);
         htp.listHeader('Status',null);
         htp.listHeader('Billed',null);
         htp.listHeader('Billed Amount',null);
         htp.listHeader('Expected Amount',null);
         htp.listHeader('Balance',null);
         htp.listHeadClose;
    --billed
               begin
                  select decode(ci.approved, 'Y', 'Yes', 'No') into h_billed
                     from claim_item ci
                     where claim_item_id in (select claim_item_id
                                                             from claim_item_line cil
                                                             where ci.claim_Item_id = cil.claim_item_id
                                                             and cil.claim_item_line_id = c_claim_item_line_id);
                  exception when no_data_found then
                     h_billed := null;
                  when too_many_rows then
                     h_billed := 'Yes';
               end;
    if c_type in ('C')  then
                  begin
                     select decode(ci.approved, 'Y', 'Yes', 'No') into h_billed
                        from claim_item ci
                        where claim_item_id in (select claim_item_id
                                                                from claim_item_activity cia
                                                                where ci.claim_Item_id = cia.claim_item_id
                                                                and cia.claim_item_activity_id = c_claim_item_line_id);
                     exception when no_data_found then
                        h_billed := null;
                     when too_many_rows then
                        h_billed := 'Yes';
                  end;
               end if;
    --balance amount
               if h_claim_Item_id is not null then
                  begin
                     select balance_amount into h_bal_amt
                        from claim_item
                        where claim_item_id = h_claim_item_id;
                     exception when no_data_found then
                        h_bal_amt := 0;
                  end;
               else
                  h_bal_amt := 0;
               end if;
               if temp_claim_item_id is null or temp_claim_item_id != h_claim_item_id then
            h_total_bal_amt := h_total_bal_amt + nvl(h_bal_amt,0);
           end if;
    htp.listData('<B>Total reflects the client balance for the services listed.  To view the total client balance you must view the Complete Transaction History.  The calculation use for the TOTAL amount is, the total amount of the services on THIS screen minus any payments which have been received and have not been applied to services.</B>',11);
         htp.listData(nvl(to_char((nvl(h_total_bal_amt,0) - nvl(h_cl_bal,0)),'$999,999.90'),0));

    This question probably belongs in the Application server forum under the mod_PLSQL heading.

  • Total Amount before Discount do not match Row total

    Hi,
    I have this scenario for my A/R invoice. The amount in the the total (lc) column do not match with the total before discount field.
    So, when I tried to create Cm for this invoice I encountered an error: There is a difference between total and it's contents.
    What is the possible cause for this and how will I resolve this?
    Thanks!

    Hi Nelle,
    If you are create any UDF related to this calculation at row level then first remove it then check it.
    There are no any UDF created then upgrade your PL..
    Thanks,
    Srujal Patel

  • How to fix the issue Total CN amount show in FSCM not tally with total CN amount in GSAP?

    Hi ,
    How to fix the issue that is Tolat CN amount show in FSCM not tallying with Total CN amount in GSAP?
    Can somepone reply for this asap ?

    Hi Janet,
    Use the transaction ABF1 PK 70 and 75 fill in the g/l account from the asset and  TType 100. Don't fill in asset number.
    Give only for this case authorization for ABF1 when the values are ok take away this authorization

  • Income tax amount not coming is payslip

    Dear Experts,
    In remuneration statement the income tax amount is not appearing in deduction window, but where amount is getting deducted from earning.
    As a result the earning minus deduction is mismatch,  i.e. net salary is not correct.
    Ex:
    i.e. Earning 30000
    Deduction 2000
    Net is appearing as 26500. Which is wrong
    the wage type /460 is been maintained in pay slip,
    Value for /460 and /470 is not getting updated in RT table.
    Where as value for /458 and /401 is appearing in RT table.
    can any one share me your ideas where exactly the error might be or what changes to be done.
    Since it is month its an important one.
    Thanks and Regards

    there must be some other salay component which is getting added up in the gross.
    also, check the processing in RT for the cumulative wage types.
    Regards,
    Shruti

  • Form 16 - Issue on arrear amount

    Dear all,
    I have run payroll of April, 2010 and also for May month with revision of salary w.e.f. April, 2010. There some employees are getting arrears. In form 16 when I am checking the amount of that wage type in emoluments paid (page no. 4) that is taking etc amount of arrears.
    e.g. April month Basic 2000, Spl allow 3000 then because of promotion now basic is 2800, spl allow 4000.
    as per the calculation in form 16 emolument paid, Basic should come = 20002800800 = 5600 and Spl allow should come = 300040001000 = 8000.
    but here it is calculating like this :
    Basic = 28002800800 = 6400
    Spl Allow = 400040001000=9000
    It is adding up etc arrear amount in pay-result of April month. it is generating double record of April month one with old payroll run and one with new revision details and considering the new one for form 16 calculation.
    Kindly suggest me the solution.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Verma N

    problem has resolved.
    Thanks to all.

  • Excise duty and freight amount not capture

    Dear All,
    Stock transfer between two plants (MFG to SALES)
    I have assigned Excise and freight condition in RM2000 pricing schema and done the
    stock transfer(VL10B,VF01,J1IIN) from one plant to another plant, But at the time of MIGO
    at receiving plant accounting entry are happening based on the VPRS price (Inv. FG Cr at
    supplying plant and Inv Dr at receiving plant), ED and freight amount are not adding
    in the material price at the time of MIGO.We are using pricing procedure at the time of
    delivery for billing.Plz advice whot wrong is there.
    regards,
    SPS

    Hi
    Can u pls chk in your pricing procedure weather the stastics chk box is ticked for the respective condition type.
    If so pls remove and try again.
    Vijay

  • Create a multiple Pg PDF with Forms, while adding up total of each page.

    My name is Javier Morales, I am working on a project for a client in the clothing business. I created a form that it is working very good. I would like your help on figuring out how to insert additional pages to a Pdf form document and keep on adding the Totals of each page.
    My email [email protected] I will really appreciate your prompt response. Right now I have them as single PDF documents, which work fine, as long as I dont try to combine them.

    Fields within an AcroForm PDF need to uniquely named unless you want the identically named fields to share the same value.
    You may have to rethink your approach. You should look at using the template object to spawn additional pages. Unformtuately templates do not function in versions of Reader before XI.

  • Freight  Amount not shown in Target Documents

    Hi ,
    I have created a Purchase order with Freight Charges , But when i m copying the PO to Targets Documents(i.e GRPO, Invoice) then Freight amount is Not appeared . Pls suggest what to do  in this case .
    Regards
    Raman Preet singh

    Hi raman.sap 
    Check this
    Administration -> General -> Setup ->Freight - Setup Window
    Drawing Method Specify the required calculation method of the freight per row. The calculation method you select becomes evident when you copy rows from a base document to a target document. The options are:
    None u2013 No freight will be copied to target document.
    Quantity u2013 The amount is divided into the item quantity and each unit carries the same amount of freight.
    Total u2013 SAP Business One calculates which part of the document total or row total is copied to the target document. It then adds the relative amount of the document or row freight to that target document.
    All u2013 Copies all the freight to the target document.

  • New Loan wage type to be added in total deductions

    Hi,
    I have to include new wage type say as Thrift Guarantee (2440) as standard value of Re.1. When the entry is putting in IT 0045 this wage type 2440 automatically will generate. Now i want it to include in total deductions in payslip. I believe that its somewhere missing in PCR AND Schema. Cumlation class 10 tick is already there. its already included in the payslip while calculating total deduction this amount is not including in total deduction.
    Can anyone guide me on this step by step.
    Edited by: suresh kumar on Jun 15, 2011 5:58 AM

    Fruther to my question i found the relevant pcr and modified the pcr in the line 180
    000010              ELIMI *   NEXTR A                        ANNUITY/INSTALLMENT
    000020          A D VAKEYLNCLS
    000030 A            AMT=N /LIDNEXTR A                        INTEREST
    000040 A        A   ADDWTN/LLBNEXTR B
    000050 A        B   AMT=N /LEPNEXTR C    EXT INST
    000060 A        C   AMT<N /LLBZERO=&HELPADDWT&HELPSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBNEXTR D
    000070 A        D   AMT=N /LEPSUBWTN/LEPAMT=& HELPADDWTN/LEPNEXTR E
    000080 A        E   AMT= ANRTENEXTR F              ANNUITY
    000090 A        F   AMT<N /LLBSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBAMT-N /LIDADDWTN/LRP
    000100 I          D VAKEYLNTYP
    000110 I ****       AMT=N /LIDNEXTR A     SUBWTI/110                   INTEREST
    000120 I ****   A   AMT=N /LEPNEXTR B    EXT INST
    000130 I ****   B   AMT<N /LLBZERO=&HELPADDWT&HELPSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBNEXTR C
    000140 I ****   C   AMT=N /LEPSUBWTN/LEPAMT=& HELPADDWTN/LEPNEXTR D
    000150 I ****   D   AMT= TILBTNEXTR E              REG INST
    000160 I ****   E   AMT<N /LLBSUBWTI/110ADDWTN/LRPSUBWTN/LLB
    000170 I 9040       AMT=N /LIDNEXTR A               INTEREST
    000180 I 9040   A   AMT+0.25  NEXTR B               INTEREST
    000190 I 9040   B   SUBWTI/110NEXTR C
    000200 I 9040   C   AMT=N /LEPNEXTR D    EXT INST
    000210 I 9040   D   AMT<N /LLBZERO=&HELPADDWT&HELPSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBNEXTR E
    000220 I 9040   E   AMT=N /LEPSUBWTN/LEPAMT=& HELPADDWTN/LEPNEXTR F
    000230 I 9040   F   AMT= TILBTNEXTR G              REG INST
    000240 I 9040   G   AMT<N /LLBSUBWTI/110ADDWTN/LRPSUBWTN/LLB
    Now i want it to consider the retro especially from march'2011 or only from previous month. How to proceed on this
    Regards

  • PO tax value is not added in net price

    Hi
    In PO tax value is not added in Net price .
    In the pricing elements it is showing the total value .
    But in the field of net value , it is not calculating the net value and so it is showing in the PO print out.
    Kindly advise.
    regards,

    Hi Sandeep,
    In case u want to print the net value with the tax u have to make the value as print relevant in the pricing procedure .
    And also u need to store this value in the field from  where the net price is printed and again this can be done in the pricing procedure.
    Hope this will help you .
    Please reward points for useful answer.
    Regards
    Mani

  • [svn:osmf:] 15195: 1. Ensure that fragment ID will not exceed the total number of fragments as indicated by the segment run table .

    Revision: 15195
    Revision: 15195
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-04-01 17:51:23 -0700 (Thu, 01 Apr 2010)
    Log Message:
    1. Ensure that fragment ID will not exceed the total number of fragments as indicated by the segment run table.
    2. Fix bug FM-574, FM-586 and FM-614
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-574
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-586
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-614
    Modified Paths:
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/events/HTTPStreamingFileHandlerEvent.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/HTTPNetStream.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/HTTPStreamingNetLoader.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/AdobeBootstrapBox.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/AdobeFragmentRunTable.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/BoxParser.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/HTTPStreamingF4FFileHandler.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/HTTPStreamingF4FIndexHandler.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/FLVTagAudio.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/FLVTagVideo.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/OSMFTests.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/FLVTestHelper.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/TestFLVTagAudio.as
    Added Paths:
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/TestFLVTagScriptDataObject.a s
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/TestFLVTagVideo.as

    Revision: 15195
    Revision: 15195
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-04-01 17:51:23 -0700 (Thu, 01 Apr 2010)
    Log Message:
    1. Ensure that fragment ID will not exceed the total number of fragments as indicated by the segment run table.
    2. Fix bug FM-574, FM-586 and FM-614
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-574
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-586
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-614
    Modified Paths:
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/events/HTTPStreamingFileHandlerEvent.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/HTTPNetStream.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/HTTPStreamingNetLoader.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/AdobeBootstrapBox.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/AdobeFragmentRunTable.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/BoxParser.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/HTTPStreamingF4FFileHandler.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/HTTPStreamingF4FIndexHandler.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/FLVTagAudio.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/FLVTagVideo.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/OSMFTests.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/FLVTestHelper.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/TestFLVTagAudio.as
    Added Paths:
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/TestFLVTagScriptDataObject.a s
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/flv/TestFLVTagVideo.as

Maybe you are looking for