Assign combination (note on + sostenuto)

Hi everybody,
is it possible to trigger a MainStage activity (e.g. patch change) by a combination of events (e.g. note on + sostenuto pedal)?
thanks in advance!

thanks lifenoise, your suggestion to trigger something directly by pedal helped me find the perfect solution:
I created a patch that serves as a transitional patch. This patch is triggered by the pedal (soft pedal or sostenuto), and within this patch I have assigned lots of screen control buttons to "jump to patch" actions and each button is assigned to a particular note-on event.
For me (and probably for many other people, too), this is a perfect solution to quickly change patches!
Heureka!

Similar Messages

Error while creating Absence as "APP-PAY-51271: The assignment is not eligible for the element

Hi,
"APP-PAY-51271: The assignment is not eligible for the element."

Hi Nandhu,
Can you check below two things which can be cause of this error:
1. The link definition of the non-recurring element which is tagged with this absence type, as a best practice this should be an open link. If the link definition and the assignment eligibility is not matching then you may receive this error.
2. If you have defined an accrual plan for this absence type,then check if the accrual plan recurring element is been tagged to the assignment for which you are receiving this error.
Thanks,
Sanjay

'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS item

'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' -> This BAPI works perfectly without the 'account assignment' option . But for purchase requisitions which have account assignments BAPI returns the error - E|8W |185   |Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS items.
Can somebody please help me to get this error resoleve .
My coding I have done like below.
DATA: pohead TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: poheadx TYPE bapimepoheaderx.
CONSTANTS : c_x VALUE 'X'.
DATA: exp_head TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: return TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitem TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitem WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitemx TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: posched TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedule WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poschedx TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedulx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNT TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNT WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNTX TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNTx WITH HEADER LINE.
pohead-comp_code = '1000'.   "IEQ1 plant. "'1000'.
pohead-doc_type   = 'NB'     .
pohead-creat_date = sy-datum   .
pohead-vendor = EKKO-LIFNR. "'0000500004'.
pohead-purch_org = purch_org.
pohead-pur_group = purch_grp.
pohead-langu      = sy-langu   .
pohead-doc_date   = sy-datum.
poheadx-comp_code = c_x.
poheadx-doc_type   = c_x.
poheadx-creat_date = c_x.
poheadx-vendor     = c_x.
poheadx-langu      = c_x.
poheadx-purch_org = c_x.
poheadx-pur_group = c_x.
poheadx-doc_date   = c_x.
poitem-po_item    = iLineItem.      "1.
poitem-material   = req_item-MATERIAL.   " '000000000040000234'.
poitem-plant      = req_item-PLANT.
poitem-quantity   = req_item-QUANTITY.
poitem-net_price = NET_PRICE.
poitem-price_unit = PRICE_UNIT.
poitem-shipping   = 'Z1'.
poitem-preq_no    = req_item-PREQ_NO.
poitem-preq_item = req_item-PREQ_ITEM.
poitem-acctasscat = 'K'.
APPEND poitem.
poitemx-po_item    = iLineItem. "1.
poitemx-po_itemx   = c_x.
poitemx-material   = c_x.
poitemx-plant      = c_x .
poitemx-quantity   = c_x .
poitemx-tax_code   = c_x .
poitemx-item_cat   = c_x .
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x .
poitemx-net_price = c_x.
poitemx-price_unit = c_x.
poitemx-shipping   = c_x.
poitemx-preq_no    = c_x.
poitemx-preq_item = c_x.
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x.
APPEND poitemx.
POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-GL_ACCOUNT = '0000211010'.
POACCOUNT-SD_DOC = '0001001056'.
POACCOUNT-ITM_NUMBER = '000100'.
POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'.
APPEND POACCOUNT.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEM = '00001'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NO = '01'." '01'.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-GL_ACCOUNT = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SD_DOC = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-ITM_NUMBER = 'X'.
APPEND POACCOUNTX.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
    EXPORTING
      poheader = pohead
      poheaderx = poheadx
    IMPORTING
    exppurchaseorder = ex_po_number
    expheader        = exp_head
    TABLES
      return    = return
      poitem    = poitem
      poitemx   = poitemx
      POACCOUNT = POACCOUNT
      POACCOUNTX = POACCOUNTX.

I found the answer

Changes in Customizing for agent assignment do not transport well

Hi,
We have made changes in some tasks regarding agent assignment (we select the option 'General Task' in the Attributes button). This generates a Customizing request.
After releasing these 2 requests (Customizing and Workbench), we transport them from Development to Test. But when checking the new workflow in Test, the Customizing modifications regarding agent assignment do not occur.
We have tried the two possible sequences of transporting the requests: first Customizing and then Workbench, then the other way, with same results.
Is there any specific order that should be followed to correctly transport Customizing and Workbench requests?
I appreciate your help!
Regards,
Ivson

Thanks a lot,
Our wf doesn´t use organizational structure, but checking the transport logs as you suggested (that´s what I should've done first!), has shown an error of type 12 in the last Customizing requests we have sent.
The log error's header says
'Method execution 08.09.2006 16:01:39 (12) Canceled',
Going to the details,
'Execution of programs after import (XPRA)'
'Ended with return code: ===> 12 <==='
There is also one Workbench request with the same type of error.
All clues are welcome,
Best regards,
Ivson

IN SALES ORDER PLANT IS CHANGED BUT FM ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT IS NOT CHANGED

HI ALL
while changing the plant in sales order LINE ITEM FM accounting assignment is not changing accordingly FOR THE PARTICULAR LINE ITEM.
FOR THIS REASON NO ACCOUNTING DOCUMENT IS GENERATING.
THANKS & REGARDS
MALA

solution found.
Mala k reddy

OKB9-Internal order assignment is not working

Dear Guru
I have an Requirment that whenever Billing document get posted data must flow to xxxxx Internal order.I assign the Internal order to cost element in OKB9.But not when posting billing document I cant see internal order in accounting or general ledger view.

Hi Deepali
If copa is active, revenue will post to copa. Okb9 is just a default and is used when no other cost object found
If you want biling to post only to Int order, assign it in your sales order account assignment tab
Note that in vkoa, you will need to maintain GL acct against Kofi and kofk both in that case
If you want it to post to both IO and copa, enter IO along with Prof segment in sales order
Br. Ajay M

APP-FND-01702 An assignment does not exit for these parameters

Hi,
I am facing this below error in AP,AR,CM,GL Modules. If any one knows the solution plz revert back ASAP,
I encountered the error message when I created an invoice in AP module:
APP-FND-01702:An assignment does not exist for these parameters and one is mandatory.
Cause:The profile option Sequential Numbering is defined to have
sequential numbering always used. The current set of parameters does not have a sequence assigned.
Acction: Go to the Assign Sequqnces screen and assign a sequenct to the current set of parameters.
Regards,
senthil

Hi Senthil,
this is an issue with the configuration only, when the profile option is Always used system is referring to your Sequential numbering configuration, which seems to be not right / incomplete...Hence verify whether you have defined assignment for all the categories in the modules and re-test the same again ....
You can change the profile option value to Partially used, which will not throw an error, it would only give you a warning ..
Regards,
Ivruksha

KO23 Object currency assigned value not equal Line item assigned value

Dear all:
I have one problem. Some Internal Order budget use KO23 view about Object currency assigned value not equal Standard Reprt
S_ALR_87013019 - List: Budget/Actual/Commitments assign value.
I don't knew what happen ?
So I wish someone can give me a hand. Tel me how to fix this problem.
thank you !

Hi Jason,
First of all:
The displayed account code must be translated into the internally used code ("_SYS...") when using segmentation - when not using segemntation it is just internal code = displayed code.
The code displayed is just a sample to give you a hint in case you are already familiar with the SAP Business One application.
Therefore the sample code does not talk about where you got e.g. the value for FormatCode from ("FormatCode" is e.g. a field in table OACT where the account name with segments is (redundantly) stored without separators).
The user should know on which account he/she wants to book a line on; maybe you might want to give some help to the user by displaying a dialog with suitable - or preselected accounts?
In addition I am sure you know how to assign a string value to a string property - without explicitly writing it, right?
HTH,
Frank

SRM 7.0 extended : Account assignment is not getting populated by default

Hi All,
We have created Purchase order using shopping cart in SRM 7.0 extended classic scenario. Assuming that the delivery from the vendor is done. In Goods receipt The Account assignment is not getting populated by default. If we did the same manually it is picking up the details by default.
please let me know what we are missing.
Regards,
Lakshmi Narayana

Hi Laksmi
Account info must defaulted if it is not direct procurement.
check or you ordering as direct or not? if you have SC has Acc data and it must be copied into PO by default...
Muthu

BAPIthe component to be assigned has not been completely specified

Hi,
I am using the BAPI "BAPI_ROUTING_CREATE" to create a Routing. It works fine creating the operations, Component allocations and updating the Header data Information.
The Problem i am facing is with the allocation of components with Phantom assembly. Can any one help me in passing the Parameters to the BAPI to allocate the components with the Phantom assembly.
i am getting error message
"cpccdt-206 The component to be assigned has not been completely specified "
Thanks
Pravin

Hi Pravin,
Did u got any solution for this problem i m getting the same error
Please give me some solution tooo.
Thanks

Source System GD1 and Plant 123 combination not allowed

Hello everyone,
I had a requirement to add new values to an already existing variable ssid/plant in my Planning area, so that the user can see these values when he gets to the relevant planning screen. Therefore I made sure that the values did exist in Master Data for plant with the correct source. I do see the new SSID and Plant in the UPSPL screen as well as a part of the dropdown.
When I try to execute the manual planning in BPS0 screen, I get u2018Source System GD1 and Plant 123 combination not allowed.
Can someone please help me in understanding the problem and correcting it .
Thanks,
Raj.

I guess I figured it myself.
After double clicking on the planning area, I go into the 'Characteristic Relationships' and look for the relevant combo (in my ex: Ss and plant) and looked for the FM that validates the combo and add specific entries I am looking for.
Thanks,
Raj

Why account assignment is not deleted when push "Order as Direct Material"?

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem with shopping carts (SC) of stock items:
1.- I add 5 items.
2.- I push "Order as Direct Material" button for 3 items only.
3.- I push "Hold" button to set SC with held status.
4.- I modify the SC and push "Order as Direct Material" button for 2 items missing.
5.- I order the SC.
One of the effects that it has the "Order as Direct Material" button is that it deletes the account assignment because the items will use to create a PO stock.
But for the last 2 items (number 4.-) the account assignment is not deleted.
This is causing that the PO's have error: "Invalid tax code".
Somebody can say to me why is not deleting the account assignment for items previously hold?
My systems are:
SRM 4.0 (SRM_SERVER 500) level 8
R/3 4.7 (SAP_APPL 470) level 24

Juan Alonso Valenzuela Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi Gurus,
>
> I have a problem with shopping carts (SC) of stock items:
>
> 1.- I add 5 items. -- O.K - Assumed that you have 5 items added
> 2.- I push "Order as Direct Material" button for 3 items only.O.K.You selected as ORDER as direct only for 3 rd item
> 3.- I push "Hold" button to set SC with held status.- O.K. now HOLD the shopping cart
> 4.- I modify the SC and push "Order as Direct Material" button for 2 items missing.- Now you went to 2 nd items and ORDER as direct
> 5.- I order the SC.but this 2 nd item account data was not removed though you selected as ORDER as direct-
check item data what is stored here DP ? if account assignment not cleared it could be a bug. but you need to convince them to get a correction note.
>
> One of the effects that it has the "Order as Direct Material" button is that it deletes the account assignment because the items will use to create a PO stock.
>
> But for the last 2 items (number 4.-) the account assignment is not deleted.
>
> This is causing that the PO's have error: "Invalid tax code".
>
> Somebody can say to me why is not deleting the account assignment for items previously hold?
>
> My systems are:
> SRM 4.0 (SRM_SERVER 500) level 8
> R/3 4.7 (SAP_APPL 470) level 24

Binding assignment is not available:Error in the evaluation of expression

Hi All,
I have created Workflow to send an Email using Requested Start date concept of a Task.This is for sending a E-mail to the customer when contract end date-60 Days.
I have done all Bindings and I am getting The date and time from BOR which I am using to triger an Event.
I am getting these type of Errors:
Source (expression '&BUS2000137.TIME&') of binding assignment is not available
Source (expression '&BUS2000137.DATE&') of binding assignment is not available
Error in the evaluation of expression '<???>&BUS2000137.DATE&' for item '1'
Unable to determine the value of component ''
Error in the evaluation of expression '<???>&BUS2000137.TIME&' for item '1'
Unable to determine the value of component ''
Looking for Inputs.
Regard's,
Lokesh

Hi Adrash/Rick,
Object type ZBS2000137
Attributes
ZBS2000137.Time    Time to send mail --> Is nothing but OBJECT-TIME = SY-UZEIT
ZBS2000137.Date    60 days before contract end date --> Is nothing but OBJECT-DATE = LS_APPOINTMENT-DATE_FROM - 60.
Methods
ZBS2000137.Method1       Sending Mail
Events
ZBS2000137.Released      Contract Line Item Released
ie I want to excute the task with same DATE and TIME, the same I have mentioned in "
Requested Strat Tab with Expression as below
Refer.date/time EXP Expression
Date &BUS2000137.DATE&     60 days before contract end date
Time &BUS2000137.TIME&      Time to send mail
Note: If I am testing the Workflow from T-code: SWUS it is working fine.
Regard's,
Lokesh.

How to assign resource (not personel resource) to Activity/WBS/Network

Hi,
can anybody show me how to assign resources (not personel resource) to Activity/WBS/Network, how to plan/manage resources in PS
Thank you
Long

Hi,
Resource Planning will work in Project in two methods.
1.work center:
In work center we will assign resources such as machines etc to execute the Projects
2. Workforce Planning:
In work force planing resource assignment to network activity will happen. Project Team will be assigned to WBSE. Capacity planning / levelling will happen through this functionality.
Refer the below URL to know more details of resource planing in projects
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/ed/b7853488601e33e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rakesh Pradhan

Why zero is assigned for not a public holiday in public holiday class

why zero is assigned for not a public holiday in public holiday class

Are you trying to accomplish the same effect as JSplitPane.setOneTouchExpandable( false ) ?

Assign combination (note on + sostenuto)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for