Associating external editor in Eclipse for OSX

How do I associate an external editor to eclipse?
With Windows and Linx I can do this with Preferences->General->Editors->File Associaion. I then click the file type (in this case *.doc), and browse to the application (either OpenOffice or MS Word) and select the app that I want. Then whenever I select a file of that type inside of eclipse, it opens the file in the associated editor.
But when do the same thing in OSX, the program never starts.
There must be some way to call OpenOffice or MS Word from inside eclipse.
Does anybody know how to do this in OSX?
Thank you for you help
MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   eclipse 3.2.2
  Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

This sounds like a bug. We probably don't test with a prompt
containing a carriage return. You can file this bug using
http://bugs.sun.com if you like. Look for the "Sun Studio" categories.
--chris                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Similar Messages

  • "Use RAW files with external editor" greyed out for Photoshop CS2?

    I've just upgraded from iPhoto 5, and the "Use RAW files with external editor" option in the advanced preferences is greyed out when I select Photoshop CS2 as my external editor (back in the General pane).
    It works fine when Preview.app is selected. I can understand that pre-CS2 Photoshop wouldn't be available, but CS2 is capable of editing RAW images.
    Has anyone been able to get iPhoto 6 to send a RAW image to Photoshop CS2 using this preference? I've written an Applescript to do it in iPhoto 5, but I'd rather use something cleaner...
    15" PowerBook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

    Works great with Photoshop Elements, opens with Camera Raw. The issue is you can't save it so that iPhoto gets the changes.
    You have to save it and then re-import. I tried all permutations of saving it in originals and modified folders in the library. No luck. The only thing I didn't try is to save it as a jpeg over the top of the full sized one iPhoto created on import.

  • External hard drive recommendations for OSX 10.4.7 and Windows XP

    I just purchased an iMac20. I used bootcamp and have Windows XP running on a partition. I want to purchase an external hard drive for backup. Recommendations for an easy to use device that will allow backup of both operating systems without too much confusion. Thanks.

    If you have 250GB drive, look for FW400 w/ 320GB.
    I have bought a dozen (FW800/400 mostly) from OWC:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/usb/eliteclassic

  • Intensify as external editor: how, and how well, does it work?

    Intensify from developer macphun I have assigned as an image editor in iPhoto Preferences/Advanced.  In iPhoto when i click on Edit the image opens in Intensity and can be edited.  Unfortunately, saving after editing the image presents a standard file dialog offering to save the edited image in Documents.  Getting the edited image back into iPhoto requires importing.  Afterwards other data, such as Places, Faces and notes, are gone, although the original unedited photo remains in iPhoto and still has the data. 
    To edit with Intensify seems to require exporting, editing, then re-importing the photo.  Is this how all iPhoto external editors work?  I had thought that an external editor would substitute for iPhoto's editor and edit the existing photo while it remained in the iPhoto library  I see on the MacPhun web site that Intensify Pro can be run "...as either a standalone app or as a plug-in to Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Photoshop Elements, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom and Apple Aperture."  Does iPhoto need a plug-in version to simply replace its internal editor? 
    In past versions OS X allowed applications to provide services to one another.  I have not kept up with how services are implemented, but I think I expected iPhoto to essentially use its services when an editing program was selected. 
    Can someone more familiar with OS X services, iPhoto's use of external editors in general and/or Intensity in particular, help me understand this?

    Terrence,
    Thanks for the comments. I appreciate the help.  Sounds like you have considerable expertise in what I need to learn.  Some of what you said I do not understand.  If you could clarify these points it would help me more. 
    You say "No it's not like this with any editor used as an external editor in iPhoto."  I assume you mean an external editor would edit the photo while the photo remains within the iPhoto database, so export to edit followed by import to return the edited photo to iPhoto would not be needed.  Is this correct?
    You say "... Intensify isn't an editor, it's a non-destructive database-based application."  In my very limited reading and experience, it seems Intensity modifies single image files.  How is an application intended to modify image files to change their appearance not an editor?  How is an application intended to work with single files a database-based application? 
    While posting here I also asked MacPhun support a similar question.  They replied "This editing procedure is fine, you can send the edited image from Intensify to iPhoto as shown at the screenshot attached." 
    The menu choice shown does allow saving in iPhoto after pressing in Intensity.  However, the edited image imported into iPhoto has lost metadata such as found faces, places and comments associated with the original, and it is placed in a new Event.  That MacPhun support refers to the product of what Intensity does as "the edited image" shows why I referred to Intensity as an image editor. 
    You say "In essence, you cannot use a non-destructive processor as an editor" yet "With Aperture I have used it as a plug-in."  To me this sounds like one can use Intensity as a non-destructive processor if Intensity's function is accessed as a plug-in.  That is, the necessity to export images from iPhoto to "process" (what I would call edit) them in Intensity results from how Intensity and iPhoto access the image files, not from the type of processing involved. 
    You say "This has nothing to do with services ..."  Agreed.  I mentioned services because I thought one application modifying data for another seemed like a service. 
    On further consideration I realize that non-destructive, eh, processing of an image requires storing the original plus the processing steps which have been implemented.  This seems similar to what iPhoto's built-in editing functions do.  However, I suspect Intensity's more complex processing of the image requires a more complex file structure, which iPhoto cannot read or write. 
    Supporting this idea of different file structures, I see my originals in iPhoto are typically JPGs of size 800 KB - 5 MB.  After processing by Intensity, "-edit" is append to the file name, the format changed to tiff, and the file size increase by a factor of 8.  The format conversion and consequent increase in file size I have not seen mentioned in Intensity's literature, but may be of significance to other potential users. 
    You say "There is no plug-in for iPhoto - perhaps you should ask the developers to make one."  Agreed.  Not for iPhoto, which is being terminated, but for its replacement Photos. 

  • External Editors & File Naming

    I would like to be able to name files returned to LR by an external editor with the name of the external editor itself. For example, if I am going from Lightroom to various Nik Software editors I might:
    LR->Dfine->LR->Color Efex->LR->Viveza->LR
    As of now, I have "Edit" post-pended to the file so I end up with something like "filename-Edit-Edit-Edit.tif" by the time I'm done. I can manually edit the names, but this would be better:
    I'd like to be able to specify a name or abbrevition for the external editor, e.g., Define, CEfex, Viv, Viveza, CS3, whatever and have that added to the filename instead.
    Something like: "filename-Dfine-CEfex-Viv.tif" tells me a lot more about what was done with the file and where I left off in my workflow.
    Also, the External Editor dialog could use some cleanup. I suggest putting the save/delete/update optons elsewhere as it is not obvious that they are in the Preset drop-down.
    Finally, have to select an application and go under preset to save as new, is a non-obvous way of creating a new external editor. How about just adding a "New..." option?
    Aron

    No, there's still no way to rename Masters short of exporting them with the version name and re-importing.
    The only way 'Save As' is going to work from an external editor is if you use exactly the same file name - that is the only file Aperture has sent out and it's the only file that Aperture is expecting back.
    Saving with a different file name is functionally the same as copying a new file into the Library using the Finder - Aperture has no way to expect it. You'd have to save to somewhere outside the Library and then import it as a new Master, maybe setting up a hot folder in Automator for automatic importing.
    Ian

  • Accepting a command file as external editor

    Hi,
    It would be really nice if Lightroom could accept a .bat or .cmd file in the Preferences / External Editing dialog entries instead of only accepting executable names (.exe). This would allow to launch an external editor that needs more arguments than a mere filename on the command line.
    Another solution would be to allow us to specify command line arguments directly when defining the external editor entry. For example, after specifying the executable, I'd like to have a field allowing to specify the command line arguments like this
    -option1 -option2 <filename>  (filename being a macro representing the current image filename).
    If this field was left empty, then the default argument would be the filename as usual.
    This simple feature would greatly enhance the external editing capabilities. For the moment, when I need this feature, I create a .bat file which I convert to an .exe by using a tool like Bat To Exe Converter. Then I specify this exe in the external editor entry. But it would be much more practical to specify the arguments directly in Lightroom.
    Any thought about this?

    Being able to run any command solves part of the problem, but not the whole problem.
    The part it solves: getting the exported file(s) loaded up in the external editor (note: you may have multiple instances of the same program, in which case, it would be better to run a grand finale (after all files exported) export action instead).
    The part it does not solve is: taking responsibility for saved files in said external editor.
    Consider using Ottomanic Importer's "auto-sync selected folder" (sync continuously, add-in-place preset), along with run-any-command or post-export action, to automatically import saved files.
    PS - I would love to see Adobe implement "advanced features" using lua config files, for those who are willing and able to do things like add command-line parameters to external editor command parameters.
    Consider making official feature request here:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/new
    Rob

  • HOW TO MANUALLY CHOOSE PRIMARY EXTERNAL EDITOR

    How can I manually choose the primary external editor? Currently, it's chosen automatically. Is there a Registry fix?
    I use XP Professional with Lightroom 1.4.1 and Lightroom 2.0 Beta and 2GB RAM on a 3.2ghz Pentium 4 machine.
    Why do I need this? Well, it's not so bad with Lightroom 1, but with Lightroom 2 Beta, if Lightroom picks a program other than Photoshop for its "automatic" choice of a primary external editor, then some options for working with Photoshop are greyed out.
    Even with Photoshop selected as a secondary external editor, the choices for Merge to HDR, Stack in Layers, Merge to Panorama, Open as Smart Object are greyed out in the context sensitive menu that pops up when I right-click on an image (e.g. in Library Mode).
    Uninstalling the program that Lightroom manually picks only leave an error message for the primary external editor that Photoshop isn't found, even though it's installed. I use CS3 Design Premium with Photoshop CS3 Extended.
    What can I do?????

    Lightroom always chooses Photoshop as its primary external editor and you are not given a choice in this. It chooses this by looking at value of registry key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Adobe\Photoshop\10.0\Application Path. If that key does not exist Lightroom will display message that Phostoshop could not be found and the Edit with Photoshop menu item will not be available.
    As regards LR 2 beta and photoshop, there are many threads in the LR2 Beta forum on the issue of missing options in Edit with Photoshop. The consensus there is that you need V10.0.1 to get all the options such as HDR, Smart Object etc. This is the link to LR 2 Beta forum:
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=72&catid=678&entercat= y
    As I write this, the most recent message discusses this very topic of Photoshop editing options. By the time your read this reply it may have moved way down the list, so here is the link to it:
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?forumid=72&catid=678&threadid =1353833&enterthread=y

  • External Editor Image Quality

    As I understand matters from reading here and elsewhere before Lightroom exports an image to an external editor, say Capture NX or Fuji HV-C3, it first converts the image to a TIFF. This would be fine if you wanted the external editor's features. But my understanding, including from earlier threads on this forum, is that a reason to use an external editor is that for some photos a native converter does a better job (in sharpness, e.g.) than the Adobe converter. If this is right, then launching the external editor from Lightroom would defeat the purpose, right? If so, what a shame. I know it's possible to use the native editor first, then have Lightroom import, but that will be unnecessary for many images and I would rather work within Lightroom for all images including those few that need an external editor's conversion. Any ideas are welcome.

    Thanks to both Jao and Don. I'm about to buy a Fuji S5 and most of the photos I take with it will go either in web portfolios or prints below 8 x 10" in size. From what I understand, Lightroom will handle the S5 pictures as well as Fuji's hyperutility software for this purpose as, from what I've read, the real advantage of the Fuji native software is in sharpness, not an issue on the web or in small prints. Occasionally, I will want to print up to 13 x 19 from the S5, and for these pictures, I'd care enough about sharpness to use the Fuji software as a converter. Assuming that my guess about my work process is right, I'll use Jao's suggestion, leaving the cumbersome Fuji software aside unless absolutely necessary. If it turns out, though, that I'm getting better results on all or most images in the Fuji software, then I'll use Don's method. Thanks again.

  • I want to partition an external device for OSX and Windows.  Opened Disk utility but Partition is not an option

    I want to partition an external drive for OSX and PC.  Went to Disk Utility but Partition is not an available option.

    Why not? does the partition tab not exist?

  • How do I set up Premiere Elements 13 as the custom external editor for Lightroom 5?

    Situation
    I own Lightroom 5.6 and I'm experienced. I've just bought Premiere Elements 13 and I'm a video-editing virgin (be gentle with me). I've spent a day experimenting, reading, watching videos and I'm still stuck (I've tried reasonably hard to solve my own problem).
    Problem
    I've tried to set up the custom external editor in Lightroom 5 to send photos to Premiere Elements, so that I can incorporate images into movies. Having set it up, when I use it by selecting Photo/Edit In/Premiere Elements 13/, there is an exciting lull as a copy of the image is created and appears in LR, then Premiere Elements launches, then what??? There is no clue as to what has happened to the image regarding its import into Premiere Elements 13. It doesn't appear on the screen, it doesn't appear in the Organizer, it's no-where to be seen, other than in LR!
    Resolution sought:
    Can anyone tell me
    1. Is it possible to use Premiere Elements as an external editor in LR5 ?
    2. What are the precise settings should be for each field?
    3. If I configure it correctly, what does good look like: what should I expect to see happen in Premiere Elements?
    I don't know if this is relevant: MacBook Pro 16GB 2.8Ghz i7, 750GB SSD (i.e. plenty of space, plenty of horsepower), OS X 10.9.5
    I also don't know if I this is the right place for my question (Adobe directed me here) so please don't shout at me if I've come to the wrong place (I expect if I get no joy here, when I post it to an LR forum, they'll shout at me too :-)
    Thanks
    Phil

    Phil
    You wrote
    1. Is it possible to use Premiere Elements as an external editor in LR5 ?
    I do not have Lightroom 5 or other version of it. I did do some work on an earlier version tryout of it.
    And, I believe now as then, that the answer to your question is No. Bottom line, if there is integration
    to be found between Lightroom, it is between Photoshop Elements and the Elements Organizer, not the Premiere Elements Editor.
    The following is the extent of my travels through Lightroom with focus the Slideshow Module.
    Lightroom 4.1 Slideshow Module Visited - Elements Village
    Good suggestion to get the Lightroom view point at the Adobe Lightroom Forum.
    Best wishes
    ATR

  • How to install an external editor in version 2.1.1.64 for viewing XMLType

    I have a question about viewing XMLType in version 2.1.1.64
    If you want to view the content of an XMLType column in a data-tab, you can double click on the particular XMLType field and the edit button appears at the end. Push this edit button and an "Edit Dialog" popup appears with the data presented as one line.
    Push the External Editor button and you get a dialog that informs you about the not supported mime type of the selected object. You can find the complete list of supported mime types in Tools->Preferences->External Editor panel. I like to use an external XML editor for viewing an xmltype column, can anyone put me on the right track? Change the Editor Location for the .xml file extension didn`t work.
    Kind regards,
    Erwin Snippert

    This is the case:
    SQL Developer version 2.1.1.64
    Oracle client 11gR2
    Oracle Database 9.2.0.6.
    Under the table tree, on the left side of the screen, a table is selected with 3 columns. One of them is a XMLType column.
    Click on the data tab on the right side of the screen and a part of the xml-data is visible of that XMLType column.
    Perhaps my expectations are too high, i want to see the all XML data in a structured and readable way.
    I have tried to accomplish this by double clicking on the particular data in the XMLType column. This results in an pencil icon on the right side of the data.
    Click on this icon and a popup window appears with the 'Edit Value' titel. This windows shows the xml data as one string, not very readable.
    I have the oppurtunity to click on an 'External Editor' button. It seems to me that i can use this button to see/edit the data with an external editor.
    If you click on this button, a dialog appears with the following message : 'The Mime Type of selected object is currently not supported. Please see the complete list of supported Mime Type and extension in Tools>Preferences>External Editor panel.'
    I have 2 questions, perhaps you can put me in the right direction :
    - Why can't SQL developer standard display XML in a structured/readable way?
    - How must SQL Developer be configured to use an external editor for displaying XML data from XMLType columns?
    Kind Regards, Erwin

  • PSE 10 as external editor for Aperture 3 - 8-bit TIFF and what color space?

    Hi all,
    I'm taking the plunge and trying PSE 10 as my external editor for Aperture 3.  I understand that I need to export as 8-bit TIFF files (not 16) because PSE can't do certain things with 16-bit files.  Is that right?  Should I specify a color space in Aperture or leave it as "no profile selected"?  (I don't know much about color spaces; I'm not a pro.)  I print on an Epson RX580 Stylus Photo printer, if that matters.
    I'll be grateful for any help and advice.  Thanks.

    Can I suggest you buy Philip Andrews book, Advanced Photoshop Elements 10.  he explains colour spaces and much much more very clearly and exactly what can be done with 16 bit files and what you then have to change to 8 bit to accomplish.  He's written basic and advanced guides for Elements since day one.  Usually available from Amazon for under £20.

  • Problem using Aperture as external editor for Photoshop CS5...

    I am having trouble using Aperture as my external editor for Photoshop - if, for example, I select twenty photos and choose "edit in photoshop CS5," for some reason or another, only ten or twelve photos will show up. Some photos are always missing, and there seems to be no rhyme or reason to it. Has anyone else noticed this? It is really frustrating and slowing my workflow down immensely. Any words of advice would be greatly appreciated!

    Hi Casey.
    First lets make sure we have the flow going the correct way.  You are using Aperture, and use PSCS5 as your external editor (external to Aperture).  Right?
    Second, what size are your Masters?  When you use PS directly (not calling it from Aperture) do you regularly open twenty files at a time?
    My Masters are about 25 MPix each.  PS sizes them in the 140 MB range.  Opening twenty of them at once -- for me that's about 3 GB of data -- will probably bog things down.  Does the problem occur if you open just, say, five at a time?  What's your hardware?  How do you have PS set-up?
    And -- my top suggestion for improving your work rate: do in Aperture as much of the work as you can, and send out to PS as little as possible.  You don't say what kind of work you are doing, but Aperture, for many, suffices for almost all of there photograph processing needs.
    Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger -- some minor changes.

  • Using (Parallels) PS as an external editor for Aperture

    I am new to the Mac so perhaps this has already been addressed. If so, I apologize.
    I am using Aperture for my photo editing and have been using PhotoShop CS5, through Parallels, as an external editor. Much to my surprise this works reasonably well most of the time although sometimes I run into a very puzzling situation.
    Typically I use CS5 to take care of lens distortion since Aperture does not have that functionality built-in. I adjust an image and, if it needs perspective adjustment, I call CS5, through Parallels, convert the object into a Smart Object, Transform the object using the Distort functionality, flatten the image and save it to return to Aperture. Most of the time this works just fine. However sometimes I end up with an image that Aperture tells me it cannot open and, when I try to open it with PS again, it also fails. Sometimes the newly adjusted image just never shows up in Aperture and it is as though it dispappered into the ether.
    I have tried Save and I have tried Save As using the same location specified by PS. Save normally works but sometimes fails as described above and Save As always seems to fail. Can anyone tell me what is going on here?
    One more note. When the attempt to adjust the photo in CS5 fails I have tried again and again and it always seems to fail for those images. I have no idea why this should be but repeated attempts fail. I have success about 60% of the time and the rest of the time either I get an image that cannot be opened or an image that just disappers. I am using CS5 under Parallels because Adobe will not give me a license for the Mac version unless I upgrade and I would rather not pay the $200 and I don't want to end up in CC.
    There are really two issues here. First, why is CS5 occasionally failing and, second, is there a good replacement for CS5 that will work with Aperture to do Perspective Adjustments. I have the trial of PTLens but CS5 is much more flexible in how it allows me to distort an image since not all my image distortions from UWA lenses are symetrical and PTLens only handles symetrical distortion.
    Thanks for any help anyone can provide.

    Agreeing with 99jon, and adding that in my opinion, the only logical use of the two programs is to use the Lightroom Library Module (not the PSE Organizer) as the tool for organizing your photos, and the Lightroom Develop module as your primary editor, and the PHotoshop Elements Editor as the supplemental editor for the situation where you need more power editing than Lightroom provides.
    Why? Because Lightroom is designed  so that it can relatively seemlessly send photos to PSE for extra editing and receive the edited photo back from PSE.
    There is no relatively seemless way to have the PSE Organizer send photos to Lightroom and receive the edited photo in return. You will do a lot of extra work to make this work. I am also very skeptical about this statement, I don't think it opens your photos in the Lightroom Develop Module, but I admit I haven't tried it: "I figured out how to configure Elements to call Lightroom to edit a picture directly.  (Edit-> Preferences->Editing)  WIth that setting, I can now use lightroom on my photos."

  • Support for multiple external editors?

    I, like many people, use more than one tool, sometimes on a single picture and sometimes "right tool for the right job." Aperture seems to only allow one tool to be set, when a drop-down with all of the established external editors would obviously be better. Have I missed something or is there no provision for this? It's a pain to have to choose a new e/e each time, defeats the purpose of having a hot button for it.

    You can either:
    Modify the 'Aperture Hot Folder' Automator application so that instead of importing any images dropped into the folder into Aperture, it opens them with PS. Then do
    an 'Export Masters' to that folder.
    Do a 'Reveal in Finder' against the master and then right-click the master and select 'Open with Photoshop'(or DXO, DPP, etc) which you should be able to achieve with a folder action (similar to above).
    I use the first technique (to open RAWs in DPP to check Focus Points) but haven't implemented the second. I think it should work, but can't guarantee it.
    Steve

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to open pdf in adobe

    when I open the pdf it opens it in adobe reader rather than in adobe download assistant.  I want to type some names onto a pdf certificate.  Please help!

  • Question regarding recording vocals?

    Hi, I'm considering in purchasing an IMAC real soon. Will Garage Band allow me to record vocals while playing an mp3, wave, cd, etc, from an internal player within the mac? For instance, I currently have a WINDOWS PC which I use winamp to play the au

  • Error while  synchronizing oracle text.

    Hi, I am getting below error when synchronize oracle text index. I checked in database mentoined index is present in user schema. My database version is oracle 9.2.0.7. BEGIN ctx_ddl.sync_index ( 'IDX_DEPDOCUMENTOBJECT') END; ERROR at line 1: ORA-200

  • Hide/show data

    can anyone help with how i go about setting a collection of data up to show only titles at first, then on click it displays the description underneath it. Finally when clicking on the same thing again it hides the description ?? Below is what i have

  • Logging into ULOG failed

    Hi, We are using a eLink1.2 product on Windows 2000 OS. A DLL with following extract has been compiled and registered. ELATRACE(gmsgLevel, 9, ("ESeLinkSynch DLL: Test for <%d> trace level", nTraceLevel)); When the DLL is invoked, the text contents ar