Async timer stall behavior

In service to my unending quest to understand async timers ...
I have an app with two async timers, each with its own callback, and I understand both run on the same thread.
So if one of the callbacks stalls, will the other ever get scheduled?  If they're truly on the same, single thread, then if you lock up one of the two callbacks (e.g. put it into an endless loop), then the other callback should never get called.
Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks for the info!
Yes, I had seen behavior over long runs (application runs for weeks at a time, constantly using two async callbacks) that caused me to believe there was some unobvious semantic to the async timer scheduling, which you've just explained.  If this is NI implmentation detail, it's never been explained anywhere that I can find.
I do need to prevent the 30 second callback from taking longer than the timer period - it normally doesn't, and in that case everything works as expected.
I create the 15 second timer first, and that's the one that continues to get callbacks after the 30 sec timer stops getting its.
What I still don't have a grip on, is that if it's the 15 second timer that gets priority, and it has enqueued a bunch of callbacks missed because the 30 second timer was stuck in it's callback, why doesn't the 15 second timer flush out all of it's enqueued callbacks once it's able to?  Otherwise, queueing them up doesn't make sense.  I would have thought that the 15 sec timer would flush it's enqueud callbacks out as fast as they were serviced, and then both timers would resume getting their callbacks per their schedules.
Here's my code:
#define POLL_INTERVAL 15
#define CONTROL_INTERVAL 30
// Create polling and control async timers, start callbacks
   iPollTimer    = NewAsyncTimer (POLL_INTERVAL, -1, 1, MeasurementPoll, 0);
   iControlTimer = NewAsyncTimer (CONTROL_INTERVAL, -1, 1, Control, 0);
Another thought I have is that this is a fast, 8 core PC.  I wonder if there's some weirdness getting in due to the true parallel execution that can take place, though the async timers are on the same thread so shouldn't be a race there.
When the 30 sec timer stops getting callbacks, the 15 sec timer callback interval gets stretched out to about 25 seconds - up until then, I see the expected, regular 15 and 30 sec callbacks.
Thanks again.

Similar Messages

  • Async-sync bridge behavior

    Hello all,
    we have several scenarios where asynchronous JMS communication must be converted to synchronous RFC call. We use modules in sender JMS adapter to achieve this:
    JMS message (async) -> JMS sender channel's async-sync module -> XI (sync) -> sRFC -> XI (sync) -> JMS sender channel's sync-async module -> JMS receiver channel -> JMS message (async)
    This works perfectly when everything is OK and even when some problems occur (JMS rollback is performed). But in case of any problem in receiver JMS channel the behavior is arguable: Message is already processed in target system, response is lost forever and request is rolled back to sender queue to be processed again!
    The result is that message may be processed many times in the target system and the caller system does even never learn about it!
    We have transactional behavior set in our sender JMS channel with QoS Exactly Once. This QoS is not kept in case of receiver channel problem.
    SAP states that this is normal behavior of async-sync bridge implemented with modules (no-BPM way). But I think there should be normal asynchronous processing (some queue) used when the message is converted back to asynchronous form. Such message must never be lost in XI.
    Has anybody similar experience with async-sync bridging behavior in XI?
    Thanks
    Tomas

    This "How To" Wiki should help you with the parameters you will need in the JMS Adapter.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/HowTo...ContentconversionmodulewithJ2EEJMS+adapter
    You can go to/from files with no problem, and you don't need the Business Process Engine.

  • Log for Change of Real-Time Load Behavior

    Hi experts,
    is there a log for the change of the real-time load behavior?
    I checked SLG1, but I did not find any object / subobject that seemed to be helpful.
    Angie

    Firstly,
    How are you changing the real-time load behavior, are you using any process chain variant,in that case you can look at the process chain log..

  • Gui timer v/s Async timer priority

    Hi NI,
    I am trying to build an application where in i am communicating with an automotive ECU over RS-232 periodically. I am using an aysnc timer to do the communications part and a GUI timer to do the graphical object update. I have three questions for your team.
    1. What RTOS and PC configuration do you recommend for using a RT Async Timer with Prority ? (preferably whats available in the market today in terms of "cheap" hardware)
    2. What is the priority of the GUI timer when compared to the Async timer? Is is possible for the GUI timer to inetrrupt the Async timer fucntion call ? If yes...is there an exclusion mechanism that would stop this from happening ?
    3. I am using a two linked list concept...the first list populates while the other's data is being drawn on the strip chart...and then i flip over to populating the second linked list while the first lists data is being plotted. The communications(population of data in a structure in a linked list) is being done in the Async thread while the plotting is being done in the GUI thread. The issue i am facing is that i do not have a clean linked list population, plotting and freeing of data sequence...i feel this is due to some un-predictability in the timer function calls.(hence Q2 above). Do you recommend only using thread safe queues or do you think this is do-able with linked lists.
    Looking forward to your reponse.
    -Ashish

    I don't know what degree of certainity you need but a "fixed calling and execution sequence" is just a dream in a Windows environment.
    Windows will operate your threads together with many more of its own, all with varying priorities.
    So, you should think of priority as a vague way of making one thread to be operated more/less than another lower/higher degree thread.
    No thread priority class guarantees a certain frequency of thread execution.
    GUI timer callbacks are executed in the main program thread while async timers are executed in a seperate thread.
    So, yes their execution times may coincide. Hence the need to protect your global data.
    Data accessed by multiple threads should be protected so that, no thread would be interrupted in the middle of a write/read operation on that data.
    TSQs do that for you. Otherwise you cannot be sure about the integrity of the data you are plotting.
    If you need do some more reading about this. But TSQs stand out as a more elegant way to solve your problem.
    S. Eren BALCI
    www.aselsan.com.tr

  • How to change ADF default session time out behavior to count down

    the ADF default session time out will show a message before some time set in the web.xml , after this time anther alert will show the time out message.
    But our recruitment what use one message dialog first show the session will be out then count down the time at last show the session time out message.
    Dose ADF provide interface to change this ?

    Hi Sudipto:
    If using pure JS and Html I can write thousand way to implement session time out function , but we use ADF :
    ADF limit user to do a lot of thing but only use itself way , it is very hard to change its component's behavior and also hard to get doc introducing how to change its behavior though it can be change.
    So what I want to know if there any interface ADF left to change itself session time out behavior , I think your answer is no.
    Edited by: Yu Yang on Oct 24, 2012 12:23 AM

  • Thread vs async timer in labwindows

    i have a program in which i have to aquire / send data from serial port which is time critical ie 10 ms , my quension is that what are my options, can i use threads or use asynctimer (that can have 16 independent threads). i understand how to use asyncronus timer but my question is that are there anyother ways of creating threads in labwindows and are they as effective as asyncronous timer, please guide me in detail.
    thanks in advance
    regards ahsan

    Well, async timers are an implementation of multithreading that rely on Windows multimedia timers for scheduling events; you may consider it as an application of multithreading. It's intended to give users an easy instrument to begin programming in multithreading without much effort: you can develop and debug your app using a UI timer and then switch it to async timer to execute it in a multithreaded environment without even changing the callback definition!
    At the same time, this paradigm includes some constraints that may be not optimal in search for an optimized application.
    Having said this, you must consider that maintaining a 10 ms regular pace with no-missing-codes requirement over a long time is *really* a difficult task, if not impossible on Windows: there are so many underlying tasks in this OS that you are never guaranteed that none of them will interrupt you at some moment. Trying to achieve this goal will imply a lot of work aimed to:
    - make your app highly efficient
    - tailor the OS to close or reduce time consuming activities that may interfere with your app (antivirus; automatic updates; scheduled tasks; unnecessary services; including some from NI...)
    Frankly speaking, the 10ms constraint would claim for a real time environment, not for a Windows program!
    Proud to use LW/CVI from 3.1 on.
    My contributions to the Developer Zone Community
    If I have helped you, why not giving me a kudos?

  • Odd Time Capsule behavior

    My time capsule was working fine since I set it up in late June. I then returned from a month in Europe (sorry for whining after a month in Europe). I don't know when the strange behavior began precisely. I do know that I saw the desktop icon many times and even saw backups made of August and I think even September.
    Now, however, I cannot get my time capsule to work. It shows the last backup as July 7, which is not accurate--I know of August and possibly September backups. And it simply tries to connect "preparing" on the blue activity bar.
    The only thing I can think of is a password issue. I don't recall ever setting a password for time capsule but perhaps I'm loosing it. Should I just reset the time capsule (hard reset) and see if it asks me to set up a new password? I occasionally get a message asking for a password and every password I put in that I think could possibly be mine gets kicked back. (BTW, since the first or second time time capsule worked, I have used it only wirelessly. If I hard reset I would probably connect it with hard wire connection.
    Context: I'm new to Mac. I was a 20-plus year wintel user until June, 2008.

    First, let's find out why it's stuck "Preparing...". So consider the causes I noted in the previous post.
    The only thing I can think of is a password issue. I don't recall ever setting a password for time >capsule but perhaps I'm loosing it. Should I just reset the time capsule (hard reset) and see if it asks me to set up a new password?
    Again, if the TCs light shows green, then you shouldn't need to reset it.
    I occasionally get a message asking for a password and every password I put in that I think could possibly be mine gets kicked back.
    It will be important to know what is going on, or what you are doing when it asks for the password. Is it asking for a password only when Time Machine attempts a backup? Consider this:
    Launch Airport Utility --> Manual Setup --> Time Capsule tab.
    For "Time Capsule password" are there black dots where you would type a password? If so do you remember what you put there? If you don't then enter a new password.
    Next, is there a check mark beside "Remember this password in my Keychain"? If not, you will always be asked for a password any time the Time capsule is accessed. Put a check mark there.
    Also, click on "Disks" in the tool bar above.
    Click "File Sharing" tab.
    What is selected beside "Secure Shared Disks"? If it says "With Accounts" or "With a Disk Password" then the system will ask you for a password every time it mounts the TC hard disk. If you switch it to "With Time Capsule Password" then use the password you designated a moment ago in the Time Capsule" tab. It should only ask you once and then never again - because you had checked "Remember in keychain".
    If you have made any changes then click "Update".
    BTW, since the first or second time time capsule worked, I have used it only wirelessly. If I hard reset I would probably connect it with hard wire connection.
    Doing a hard reset, will not erase the hard drive, so you data will still be there. You won't need to connect it directly to your Mac unless you want to start over and do another full backup.
    Let us know if any of this helps
    Glenn

  • Very strange Time Machine behavior

    Lo,
    Here is my situation. I have this brand new MacMini Server with two 500Gb internal drives. I have configured the second drive to be the Time Machine volume of the first drive. First drive contains Lion Server.
    The initial backup went smoothly.
    Oct  5 09:07:05 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Starting standard backup
    Oct  5 09:07:05 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Backing up to: /Volumes/Macintosh HD2/Backups.backupdb
    Oct  5 09:07:34 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Backup content size: 274.1 GB excluded items size: 74.3 GB for volume Server HD
    Oct  5 09:07:34 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: 239.73 GB required (including padding), 410.13 GB available
    Oct  5 09:07:34 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Waiting for index to be ready (101)
    Oct  5 10:07:23 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Copied 134.9 GB of 199.8 GB, 635075 of 755583 items
    Oct  5 10:29:50 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Copied 749494 files (197.9 GB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 10:33:40 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: 1.30 GB required (including padding), 210.02 GB available
    Oct  5 10:40:15 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Copied 353532 files (73.0 MB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 10:46:39 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Starting post-backup thinning
    Oct  5 10:46:39 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: No post-back up thinning needed: no expired backups exist
    Oct  5 10:46:39 macmini com.apple.backupd[30151]: Backup completed successfully.
    That looks okay (200Gb in 1.5 hours) but above log already contains a sign of a problem. This gets more obvious with the subsequent incrementals:
    Oct  5 10:53:59 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: Starting standard backup
    Oct  5 10:53:59 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: Backing up to: /Volumes/Macintosh HD2/Backups.backupdb
    Oct  5 10:58:26 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: 1.27 GB required (including padding), 209.82 GB available
    Oct  5 11:05:07 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: Copied 353545 files (71.6 MB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 11:09:14 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: 1.28 GB required (including padding), 209.54 GB available
    Oct  5 11:15:40 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: Copied 353545 files (76.1 MB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 11:22:16 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: Starting post-backup thinning
    Oct  5 11:22:16 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: No post-back up thinning needed: no expired backups exist
    Oct  5 11:22:17 macmini com.apple.backupd[31344]: Backup completed successfully.
    Euh? So it thinks it still needs to copy >350000 files (being 1.27 Gb) and in the end it only copied 76.1 Mb.
    This now continues every hour:
    Oct  5 12:20:08 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: Starting standard backup
    Oct  5 12:20:08 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: Backing up to: /Volumes/Macintosh HD2/Backups.backupdb
    Oct  5 12:24:39 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: 1.20 GB required (including padding), 209.25 GB available
    Oct  5 12:31:22 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: Copied 353553 files (1.1 MB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 12:35:46 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: 1.20 GB required (including padding), 209.20 GB available
    Oct  5 12:42:32 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: Copied 353557 files (629 KB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 12:48:56 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: Starting post-backup thinning
    Oct  5 12:48:56 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: No post-back up thinning needed: no expired backups exist
    Oct  5 12:48:57 macmini com.apple.backupd[32497]: Backup completed successfully.
    Also note that it took 28 minutes to copy about 2 Mb.
    I used TimeTracker to see what actually got copied and in fact it did copy about 2 Mb. Not 1.20 GB.
    What could cause this behavior?
    Marc.

    Even if I exclude ~ (= /Users/<myname>) totally, it continues and even gets worse:
    Oct  5 14:03:45 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: Starting standard backup
    Oct  5 14:03:45 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: Backing up to: /Volumes/Macintosh HD2/Backups.backupdb
    Oct  5 14:05:09 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: Waiting for index to be ready (101)
    Oct  5 14:09:41 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: 560.9 MB required (including padding), 209.38 GB available
    Oct  5 14:15:07 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: Copied 134864 files (481 KB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 14:17:50 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: 593.4 MB required (including padding), 209.31 GB available
    Oct  5 14:21:46 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: Copied 134864 files (209 KB) from volume Server HD.
    Oct  5 14:32:34 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: Starting post-backup thinning
    Oct  5 14:32:34 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: No post-back up thinning needed: no expired backups exist
    Oct  5 14:32:34 macmini com.apple.backupd[33635]: Backup completed successfully.
    30 minutes for 700 KB...   134864 files ?????

  • Async timer slows operation down

    Having previously used asynchronous timers to resolve another problem that I had, I'm now looking at an issue that has got me stumped
    Here is a code snippet which has had an asynchronous timer applied
    int CVICALLBACK ParentEvent (int reserved, int control, int event, void *callbackData, int eventData1, int eventData2)
    static int iInfoFlag = 1;
    //If Com Timer event has occurred then:
    if (event == EVENT_TIMER_TICK)
    SetAsyncTimerAttribute(control,ASYNC_ATTR_ENABLED, 0);
    //First, has sonde configuration changed?
    if (iSondeConfigure_HasChanged() == YES)
    //Re-initialise displays etc, if true
    InitialiseSondeSystems(iFloatingPanels);
    //Get Sonde data
    if (ProgStatus.bComTimerEvent == TRUE)
    CompactDataControl (hParentPanel, iInfoFlag, &ProgStatus, NULL);
    //If Com events are disabled then set Sonde Info flag for next data
    //acquisition sequence
    if (ProgStatus.iComEnable != ENABLED)
    iInfoFlag = 1;
    SetAsyncTimerAttribute(ParentTimer,ASYNC_ATTR_ENABLED, 1);
    return(0);
    This routine was previously handled by a conventional timer but as these sit at the bottom of the pile when it comes to scheduling, as soon as the interface was manipluated it shut up. The timer in each case is set at 0.1 second, and if the bComTimerEvent flag is set to true, which is controlled by another (currently traditional timer) it goes away and grabs data from an external source. Using traditional timers, I can clock this 'grab the data' timer quite happily at 0.25 seconds. However with the code shown, it wont grab data any faster than about 1.5 seconds. I have timed how long it takes to call and return from CompactDataControl. With traditional timers its about 0.2 seconds, with the code as shown, its about 1.45 seconds.
    Any thoughts as to what I've missed or messed up.
    Regards
    Gavin
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    All I'm doing is calling Timer() before and after a particular function, and working out how long it takes... I've done this with both normal, and async callbacks and got significant differences. I think due to the nature of what has been done already, this code will need the same treatment as the last project I worked on that required async timers, which was a complete rewrite from the ground up. What is interesting is that that project does make changes to the GUI based on the async timers, without any obvious performance issues, despite of the fact that elements of the GUI are created in the main thread. However this project is doing an awful lot more, which might in someway explain this.
    I'd be interested to know if there is any way you can use traditional timers without the problems of timers stopping, when moving or resizing the GUI - the thing I am try to prevent by using async timers
    However I think what youre saying about your use of Async timers for number crunching, and standard timers for GUI update is a good idea, and I'm pretty sure would work for me.

  • Strange time stamp behavior in kernel log

    While I was trying to find out a little hang time during boot process on my laptop I found a strange behavior of the logging time stamp. From the logging beginning it keeps the time for lots of messages. So it´s not possible to benchmark or compare some little tweaks
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation Linux version 2.6.13-ARCH (root@Wohnung) (gcc-Version 4.0.3 20051006 (prerelease)) #1 SMP Sun Oct 23 10:51:42 CEST 2005
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation ts: Compaq touchscreen protocol output
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation agpgart: Detected an Intel i875 Chipset.
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xf8000000
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation shpchp: shpc_init : shpc_cap_offset == 0
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation shpchp: shpc_init : shpc_cap_offset == 0
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation shpchp: shpc_init : shpc_cap_offset == 0
    Nov 8 13:52:51 workstation shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
    Nov 8 13:52:52 workstation ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1d.7[D] -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 21
    Nov 8 13:52:52 workstation PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1d.7 to 64
    I use ntpd but this seems not to be related to the use of ntpd. Should be a little bug or missconfiguration. And I have this on several computers and archuser "ise" has it too. Also with different kernel versions. Any idea?

    Andy said it already, my log looks the same. It's even more messages with the same timestamp on my computer. I use the 2.6.14archck kernel from aur  on my laptop and the 2.6.13 from current on my desktop.
    My computers don't hang on startup, only the timestamp is confusing.

  • Menubar "Time Connected" behavior changed after recent updates

    Hi folks I have been using my AXBS (11n with USB) with an DSL connection.
    You can choose to display the time connected from the drop-down list from the Airport icon on the Menu bar.
    Before this upgrade (Utility 5.5.1 and firmware 7.5.2), the "time connected" shows the time of your current DSL connection, meaning i choose "Disconnect" from that Airport drop-down menu then the AXBS will terminate the current DSL connection and dial up a new connection -- and from this point, the "Time connected" count will be reset to zero. Therefore this is a time count for a single DSL connection duration. It has nothing to do with how long the router itself has been up and running.
    But after the current upgrade (Utility 5.5.2 /w fw 7.5.2), drop the DSL connection and redial will not reset the "Time connected". But if you unplug the router's power and re-plug it, it will be reset. That means the "Time connected" is now counting the time the router has been on and running.
    Since I have another Macbook pro in the same which is still running the old Airport Utility -- i did my experiment with the old Utility -- results are same with the new Utility. Then I suppose it is a firware thing.
    Guys is there anyway to make the "Time connected" to work the way it used to - just showing the duration of one DSL connection. This is important to me. Because my connection speed drops after keeping a connection alive 2 - 3 days - i need to disconnect and re-connect to revive the internet connection. Thanks a lot.

    Dylan Neild wrote:
    Seeing this as well.
    "Time connected" used to show PPPoE session uptime. It now shows device uptime.
    Definitely a bug. I filed a bug with the bug tracker so hopefully they fix it in the next release.
    Yes I filed a bug too. But it seems Apple doesnt care much about their Airports and i guess it will be a good freaking wait until the next FW update.

  • Strange Timer class behavior

    I got following problem: when i create new Timer object with default "repeatCount" = 0 argument and fire my timer it doesn't work ! if i test it with any other value it works. Added some traces to see what's going on but everything seems to work ok so i'm confused. Here is my simple class
    public final TestService
         public function TestService():void
              _timer = new Timer(5000);
              _timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER_COMPLETE,refreshTest,false,0,true);
              trace(_timer.currentCount); // says 0
              trace(_timer.hasEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER_COMPLETE)); // says true
              _timer.start();
              trace(_timer.running); // says true
         private var _timer:Timer;
         private function refreshTest(event:TimerEvent):void
              trace("timer works");
    As i said when with default repeatCount=0 refreshTest function is never reached, when i change it to 1 or sth it suddenly works ! Am i missing something ?
    I know i can get around it easily but it drives me NUTS that it doesn't work like it should ! Any ideas ? i'm on flex SDK 4.1 btw but i should point when i change it to other it doesn't work either

    According to the documentation, Timer dispatches the following events -
    Event
    Summary
    timer
    Dispatched whenever a Timer object reaches an interval specified according to the Timer.delay property.
    timerComplete
    Dispatched whenever it has completed the number of requests set by Timer.repeatCount.
    It seems like you need the timer event rathar then the timerComplete event...

  • New hard drive - odd Time Machine behavior

    Hi,
    I just had my failing HD replaced in my Macbook Pro 17" - The tech. that did it restored from the last good Time Machinr backup to the new HD, and everyrhing seems to work fine. So I then tried to do a full backup of the new HD to a brand new external HD. The first time it stopped about half way through, and yet when I enter Time Machine on the Mac, all the files seem to be there.  Then I added a few new photo files, and am now doing another Time Machine backup. But it says it's now backing up 102.95 Gigs (total on HD is 292.07 Gigs). The Time Machine preference pane doesn't seem to recognize the earlier backup (see screenshot) and yet when I enter Time Machine, it's apparently all there. How can I tell if it's working correctly?
    Thanks,
    Richard

    Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ If you’re running Mac OS X 10.7 or later, open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the page that opens.
    Select "system.log" from the file list. Enter "backupd" (without the quotes) in the String Matching text field. Post the messages from the last backup, beginning with "Starting standard backup."
    Post the log text, please, not a screenshot. If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Do not post many repetitions of the same message.
    Some personal information, such as the names of your files, may be included — edit that out, too, but don’t remove the context.

  • Bizzare system time vs. time stamp behavior after world travel ---HELP!

    This is totally annoying.
    I travel. When I am in other countries on business I change the time zone on my PowerBook in the System Preferences utility. When I got home from Singapore this last trip, I changed the clock back to the Los Angeles time zone. The clock in the upper right hand portion of my desktop reads the correct Los Angeles time, as does the time zone in System Preferences.
    Now, when I create or modify a file on my computer, the time stamp APPEARS in the OS X GUI to be in Singapore time. However, I discovered tonight that when I create a file in the Unix terminal that the time stamp in the terminal is the correct Los Angeles time.
    You can see for yourself:
    http://math.ucr.edu/~legolas/clock.jpg
    What the heck gives? This is exceedingly annoying.
    Please Advise,
    Bryce
    PowerBook 12"   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    Hi Bryce,
    maybe this is just another example of the Finder being a bit "slow". Your terminal output shows the right time stamp and that I would trust. Maybe restarting the Finder will force it to refresh. If that does not work try to restart the machine.
    -Petra

  • Strange time/clock behavior

    I set my time under Settings:Time & Date. I am in Seoul so I set the time zone to Seoul and the time to 10:20pm.
    Then I went under Extras:Clocks and created a clock with the same time zone (Seoul) but it shows a time that is one hour different!
    I have checked everything I could multiple times (deleting all clocks, trying different time zones, etc.) Why is this? Is there any way to get my clocks right?
    The main reason for this is I am using the iPod as my alarm clock and I am having a hard time guessing when it will go off.
    Thanks!

    This is just a guess, but it is possible that if your computer (the one you normally connect your iPod to) is set for Eastern Daylight Time (your profile shows you are from Atlanta), your problem may lie there. Even though you changed the time zone on the iPod, it still may be operating under the "assumption" that its main clock is set for daylight savings time. Since Korea has no daylight savings time, this may be causing your one hour discrepancy.
    As to your alarm, I would guess it will go off based on the "main" clock, not the time set to any of the extra clocks.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Stream photos in the same itunes library used to syinc.

    It's possible or not ? Have sync photos in apple tv and want to see some stream photos in the same library

  • Account balances T-code /CEECV/ROFI16

    Hello, In transaction "/CEECV/ROFI16 - Trial Balance at profit center level" I need to display it in group currency (currency typ 30). The only currency fiel that exists in the transaction is "Transaction currency" which is equivalent with the field

  • Struts Action Downloads MS word Document

    Hi All I�m trying download a MS word Document by action using the following java code: ByteArrayOutputStream writerBytes = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); response.setContentType("application/word"); response.setHeader("Content-disposition", "inline; fi

  • Epson printer issue: "rastertoescpll" error.

    I suddenly cannot print to my Epson NX230. The print queue displays an Error: /Library/Printers/EPSON/InkjetPrinter2/Filter/rastertoescpII.app/Contents/MacOS /rastertoescpII failed I have tried deleting & re-adding the printer as well as resetting th

  • HTC Incredible stuck, Wont boot

    I just got my phone literally 5 hours ago, I just got everything set up, contacts added, Etc, I go to plug it into my computer to put some music onto the phone and the phone just shuts off, I go to turn it on and it stays at the "HTC Incredible" scre