ATP Check at Delivery Level instead of Sales Order

In Standard SAP, whenever a sales order is created the ATP check is done and a Goods movement 601 is done for it and gets blocked.
I want that no movement to be carried out at Sales Order Level and should get blocked only at the Delivery level, instead of Sales order.
Can i do this by not defining any movement type in the schedule line category attached to the Item category of the sales order.

hi amit,
  u cannot remove MT assignment to SLCAT ,but what you can do is for your checking group and checking rule remove the ATP check relevancy in requirement class defination in spro customising >sd>availibility and TOR.
  so that in VOV4 transaction for your SLCAT atp will be deactivated.
only while posting material doc at the time of PGI system would check for availibility and block the goods movement.
reward if helps !!!!!

Similar Messages

  • ATP Check against customer stock for return Sale order

    Hi Friends,
    Pl.help in this.
    1. Is it possible to configure ATP check against Customer stock in a Sale order/Return order/any other way? ( Actuallly, client wants to take back empty cylinders through return sale order by ATP check against the customer stock)
    Regards,
    Mani

    Hi Mani ,
    Are you  taking cylinder as returable packing item or not?
    ex- For soft  drinks or beverages industry  it pretty common , they  use thel returnable package material type and more over why you want  use return sales order for this?
    Note- Just plz explain  scenario to MM and PP People also as availability check with all combination
    Hope it is helpful to you,
    Regards
    Venkat

  • How to ATP check when sold to party in sales order is changed?..

    Dear SD Gurus,
       I have one issue with ATP check in my current project where I need to change the the Sold to party of the sales order for a valid business case. We are using production allocation method for ATP check which reduces the Open PA qty once the sales order is saved.
    In the above scenario, once the Sold to party in sales order is changed, it redetermines everything and also goes through a ATP check which is cusing as an issue as it would again reduce the open PA qty for the same items in sales order for which are already taken into account. It would either reduce the open qty or propose the next date if it is no more available on that day.
    This is a big issue for us. Also it deleted the texts that are maintained.
    Does anyone know how to stop the ATP check in this (main issue) and also if possilble stop the deleteion of texts?
    Thank you very much for your help in advance..
    BR/
    Ashutosh

    Hello SAJU,
      The ATP check is done automatically when sold to party is changed..the issue is how to stop it? beacause of production allocation , it would be incorrect to reduce the open PA qty once more for the sales order when sold to party is changed. So I would like to stop it. Is there any exit or paramater by which we can stop ATP check?
    Thanks for your reply..
    BR/
    Ashutosh

  • Custom ATP Check using Variant Configuration Data in sales order

    I have a requirement to modify the standard SAP ATP check by including the variant configuration data entered on a item.  Standard SAP does not use/include the characteristics data when doing the ATP. None of the available user exits would allow me to do this.
    The scenario is the client has a configurable product that exist in inventory as one item, base unit as IN2.  The batches that exist in inventory have the characteristics of width and length.  The order data specifies a width and a length, they need the ATP to identify the availability based on the characteristics of the batch.
    The solution was to present the user with a list of batches based on the characteristics that meet the criteria.  The user would then have the option of choosing one of the batches which would mean that the line item would include the batch #.  If the user does not want any of the batches, they could choose to select a Make to Order option, which would change the item category of the item, so that it creates a production order upon saving the order.
    The problem I am having implementing this solution is I have not been able to identify the internal table(s) that contains the characteristics data in SAPMV45A after the configuration screen is called.  If anyone knows where that information is during the sales order processing, it would be greatly appreciated.

    Hello Jean,
    Have you managed to find a solution as yet? I know you have not received any replies but am hoping you were able to resolve the problem as we are facing the exact issue on our project.
    Please let me know,
    Thanks,
    Tanya

  • Authority check at field level in the sales order

    Dear all, our business requirement is the following:
    only some users should be able to see the prices (including netwr, netpr,...) in the sales order depending on the authority check performed on the sales group field.
    This means that for an order of sales group 'A':
    a user of sales group 'A' can see the prices and change the order, a user of sales group 'B' cannnot see the prices but can change the order, a user of sales group 'C' can display the order but cannnot see the prices.
    I ask you if such a scenario can be realized in SAP.
    We currently run SAP ECC 5.0.
    thx all !
    bye Roberto

    Hi
    In general different users will be given different authorizations based on their role in the orgn.
    We create ROLES and assign the Authorization and TCODES for that role, so only that user can have access to those T Codes.
    USe SUIM and SU21 T codes for this.
    Much of the data in an R/3 system has to be protected so that unauthorized users cannot access it. Therefore the appropriate authorization is required before a user can carry out certain actions in the system. When you log on to the R/3 system, the system checks in the user master record to see which transactions you are authorized to use. An authorization check is implemented for every sensitive transaction.
    If you wish to protect a transaction that you have programmed yourself, then you must implement an authorization check.
    This means you have to allocate an authorization object in the definition of the transaction.
    For example:
    program an AUTHORITY-CHECK.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT <authorization object>
    ID <authority field 1> FIELD <field value 1>.
    ID <authority field 2> FIELD <field value 2>.
    ID <authority-field n> FIELD <field value n>.
    The OBJECT parameter specifies the authorization object.
    The ID parameter specifies an authorization field (in the authorization object).
    The FIELD parameter specifies a value for the authorization field.
    The authorization object and its fields have to be suitable for the transaction. In most cases you will be able to use the existing authorization objects to protect your data. But new developments may require that you define new authorization objects and fields.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/67167f439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
    To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
    Authorization : An authorization enables you to perform a particular activity in the SAP System, based on a set of authorization object field values.
    You program the authorization check using the ABAP statement AUTHORITY-CHECK.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TRVL_BKS'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'
    ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD 'B'.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    MESSAGE E...
    ENDIF.
    'S_TRVL_BKS' is a auth. object
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02' in place 2 you can put 1,2, 3 for change create or display.
    The AUTHORITY-CHECK checks whether a user has the appropriate authorization to execute a particular activity.
    This Authorization concept is somewhat linked with BASIS people.
    As a developer you may not have access to access to SU21 Transaction where you have to define, authorizations, Objects and for nthat object you assign fields and values. Another Tcode is PFCG where you can assign these authrization objects and TCodes for a  profile and that profile in turn attached to a particular user.
    Take the help of the basis Guy and create and use.
    <b><REMOVED BY MODERATOR></b>
    regards
    Anji
    Message was edited by:
            Alvaro Tejada Galindo

  • How to validate Expiry Stock at Outbound Delivery level instead of checking at Goods Issue?

    Hello Everyone,
    The client wants us to validate Expiry Stock at Outbound Delivery level instead of checking at Goods Issue?
    What is the solution for this?
    Regards,
    Anwar

    Hi Moazzam Sir,
    I'm sorry for not explaining in detail. Actually, I posted the issue in a hurry. I apologize.
    Actually, the client has materials which has expiry date. They use Batch Management. They maintain expiry data (90 Days) in Shelf Life Expiration Date. Their requirement is: User is creating sales order in VA01. Then, he creates Outbound Delivery (OBD), then PGI. They want system not to create OBD, if the material has expired. They want some error message to be thrown whenever user is trying to create OBD for expired stock.
    Regards,
    Anwar

  • ATP check for delivery in ECC & Sales order ATP check in APO

    Hi All,
    Can we do an ATP check for delivery in ECC , but for the same set of Materials- Plant combination , the ATP check when a SO is created should happen in APO .
    We do not want to remove the Business event 'B'  which is meant for delivery in  APO . For some materials we need APO ATP check to happen for delivery   & for some it should be in ECC  & for SO  the ATP check should happen in APO .
    Even if we do not have check instructions pertaining to Business event 'B' & a particular check mode (for the materials where the ATP check for delivery should happen in ECC & SO check to happen in APO)  , when we are doing an ATP check for delivery , it is still pointing to APO ATP check rather than ECC check .
    Any pointers for this is highly appreciated.
    Regards
    Surendra

    Hi Surendra,
    For SO, business event is A and for delivery it's B. When integrated with ECC, the check rule in ECC points as biz event in APO.
    You can control ATP check by customized settings for check rule in ECC.
    Also, by setting requirement class and requirement type in ECC, you control check mode in APO. So, even if you dont define for check mode in APO, the system might refer from ECC for the ATP check settings. Look into your ECC customization for how requirement class is derived and settings for requirement type. (based on MRP type, strategy grp and Item cat).
    I'm not sure how you can control ATP to happen for some sales orders/deleveries in ECC and for some in APO, since check mode is mentioned in material master.
    However, there are ATP BADIs (business add-ins) available in both ECC and APO, whch can serve your purpose.
    Regards,
    Bipin

  • To Turn OFF ATP check in APO-GATP Instead do locally in ECC.

    Dear SAP Friends,
    Currently for Sales orders & Deliveries, we have ATP Check (Allocation Check + Product Check) happening in APO-GATP. We would like to turn-off ATP check in APO-GATP, instead want to do only Inventory Check in ECC locally.
    We want to do above for few particular model/plant combinations and not for all model/plant combinations. Meaning APO-GATP will still be used for many other APO relevant Model/Plant combinations.
    What are the changes required to CIF Integration models u2013 Salesorder+ATP Check, or any other IM. Any changes specific to material master in ECC - like MRP Controller, ATP Group, Strategy Group or any config changes on APO side.
    Please guide me with stepwise instructions.
    Appreciate your help.
    Thank
    Satish
    Edited by: SatishW on Jun 18, 2010 9:33 PM

    Hi Satish ,
    I am not an expert on GATP but logically what I can suggest following steps :
    1.As you want ATP check to happen in APO for few codes, you will have to Select/Tick 'Material Independant Object' - ATP Customization in CIF IM , so that ATP customizing settings are transferred to APO from ECC.
    2. But at the same time you need this ATP check to happen in ECC locally and not in APO for certain products, then in other CIF IM you have to select 'Material dependant objects '- ATP Check where you can set the filter/exclusion on those codes so that the ATP check does not take place in APO.
    3. Also like as R/3's backorder processing, in order itself you can set as the ATP check to occur in R/3 and not in APO.
    Hope this helps...
    Regards,
    Digambar

  • Partial delivery per item in sales order and ATP - schedule lines

    Hi,
    I've problem regarding ATP- schedule lines and partial delivery flag.
    In sales order there is flag Partial delivery per item B / 1 . That means create only one delivery even with quant 0. That comes from customer master or customer info-record and it is OK.
    Please look at next example.
    Customer requires:
    10 PCS of materail A on date X. Only 5 PCS are available on date X.
    10 PCS of material B on date X 0 PCS are available on date X, 10 PCS are available on date Y.
    So if we create outbound delivery on date X it will contain only 5 PCS of material  A. No successive deliveries will be created for material A because of the flag B/1. That item is closed.
    Problem is with material B.
    The sales order will be open because of material B and on date Y we can easily create another delivery with 10 PCS of mat B.
    That is wrong. Agreement with customer is only one delivery for ALL items in sales order. If we create delivery on date X it should contain only materials which are available on date X and sales order should close.
    Do you know how to fix this problem?

    Hi,
    I've think you didn't understand my requirement. I allways get schedule lines but they are confirmed on different dates.
    Example in same sales order we have:
    Schedule line for item A:
    DATE X confirmed quantity 10
    Schedule line for an item B.
    DATE X confirmed quanitity 0 (zeroe)
    DATE Y confirmed quantity 10.
    I would like to create outbond delivery on date X with:
    item A quantity 10
    item B quantity 0.
    And if that hapens than B/0 rule will work or reference customzing that you suggested before. So order will be closed because all items are processed or referenced once.
    Do you know how to do that?
    Regards

  • Partial delivery at item level base-on sales order

    Dear experts
    In the customer code,the fileld 'Partial delivery per item' controls if Partial delivery allowed.
    In my scenario,i want to control the Partial delivery base-on every sales order not customer code.
    Because some sales order of this customer code will Partial delivery allowed,some not.
    If there are configuration to implement it?
    TKS!
    Edited by: stephen chow on Oct 20, 2008 5:15 PM

    Stephen,
    If you want to restrict the Partial delivery you can do this at 3 levels:
    Customer master
    Customer material info record
    Sales order.
    If you want the specific sale order to have the partial delivery control...you can set it at the sales order-item level-shipping
    If the restriction is on Material, then maintain CMIR
    Regards,
    Prakash

  • Complete delivery indicator in the sales order header level

    my order quantity is 10 and having the complete delivery indicator in the header level
    Complete delivery indicator in the sales order header level
    when i am doing the partial delivery i got below error
    Delivery quantity is less than quantity of 10 PC assigned to batches
    this is warehouse linked.
    Please let us know how to do the partial delivery.
    when i click on the bacth icon to reduce the quantity it is greayed out.
    is there any posiblity to reduce the quantity in the transfer order
    Please do the needfull
    thanks
    Raju.

    Hi
    Usually this Complete delivery indicator flow from Customer master data. you need to change this data in Customer Master
    Sales Area Tab under Shipping view Remove the Complete delivery indicator, also in Partial delivery per item keep the field Blank ( Partial deliveries allowed )
    I hope this will solve your issue
    Award if useful to you

  • ATP check before delivery creation

    Gurus,
    Is there any way of confirming stock in sales order or scheduling agreement by some user exit before we create the delivery.
    For example i have one sales order with quantity of 10. I have 10 pieces in stock but not confirmed in sales order yet so before batch job runs and creates delivey what should be done to confirm that stock in sales order.
    Any help would be appriciated.
    Thanks
    Aman

    Hi Amandeep,
    You need to go for Rescheduling of sales order which is the standard functionality and you dont have to use user exit for the same.
    Lets say your orders are created with 0 confirmed quantity and now you have stock in the system.
    Execute the transaction v_v2 and check out the below mentioned step and result for the same.
    During the rescheduling the open sales order items release their confirmed quantities. The items are sorted according to delivery priority, creation date, document numberand item number and are then transfered to the availability check. Both sales orders are checked in the order of their creation date, because they have the same delivery priority.
    If the Unconfirmed documents required parameter is selected, at least one document of the material must be unconfirmed to assure that all documents of the material are transfered to the availability check.
    The delivery date of the sales order can be set as sorting criterion for the availability check, via the sorting criterion delivery date parameter (which you didn't choose). In this case every sales order is sorted according to the delivery date within the priority.
    Sales order items with the marks date and fixed quantity aren't rescheduled.
    # Choose .
    The system displays a list of the rescheduling results.
    In the rescheduling log you can see, that sales order  has got a new confirmed quantity (column confirmed new).
    # In the dialog box, choose Yes.
    # Choose until the overview tree appears.
    Hope this will resolve your query.
    REgards,
    Krishna O

  • ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales document

    Hi,
    System 4.70
    Is it possible to carry out an ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales documents.
    I have written a bespoke program and the program requires an ATP check to be performed for each material and sales document, I am currently using BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY which is bringing back the necessary information but it's a bit slow.
    Does any one have any ideas please.
    Regards
    J-J

    The ATP Check using the BAPI is done per material and plant. If you're looping through sales documents and then materials you're probably doing the ATP check for the same material over and over again.
    Just get the list of materials you need and the corresponding plants and call the BAPI for each of them.
    Also do a run-time analysis (tcode SE30) to check exactly what slows down your program.
    regards.

  • Sceduling as per the delivery confirmation date in sales order

    Hi,
    I am working with planning strategy 50 and using availabilty check as per ATP.
    When I create the sales order and check the availabilty, system confirms the delivery after TRLT(current date+TRLT).But when I run MRP,system creates a planned order on the req delivery date date.
    (Req date - GR Processing Time - In-House Production time) so that Planned Order is available on the req delivery date.
    As the system confirms the delivery after TRLT,I want my planned order's availabilty on the same date.
    to summarise,I don't want system to consider the Reqmt date as reqd delivery date of the sales order but the conformed delivery date of the sales order.
    I appreciate your help in letting me know if there is any way we can do this.
    Regards,
    Sastry
    Edited by: Sastry Krishna on Dec 13, 2008 4:45 PM

    Hi,
    Can you check what is the Variant (dates filed) specified by going to SM37 transaction.do as below,
    Goto SM37 transaction and give job name and then execute then select check box against date you scheduled job and then CtrlShiftF9,now place cursor on program/command and from the menu Goto-->Variant,here you check if any date range there.
    Regards,
    Chandra

  • Pricing in outbound delivery without ref to sales order

    Hello,
    I am creating a delivery without ref to sales order. I need to do pricing in the delivery for the material sold.
    1 ) I have never done the above. can someone tell  what are the config steps for  the same and what is the t code to create condition records (is it same as VK11 ).
    2 ) secondly I need to carry the pricing in the delivery to the proform invoice created with ref to delivery. How to do the same.
    regards
    Pamela

    Hi
    1 ) I have never done the above. can someone tell what are the config steps for the same and what is the t code to create
    condition records (is it same as VK11 ).
    Yes You need to maintain Condition Records Through VK11 only
    2 ) secondly I need to carry the pricing in the delivery to the proform invoice created with ref to delivery. How to do the same.
    But i am not why you required pricing procedure in delivery , but most the cases Delivery level we required Freight Charges
    At the time of Pro-forma Invoice system will pick the pricing procedure and you can check
    if you still want pricing procedure in Delivery level , assign Pricing procedure to Delivery Type
    Menu Path: SPRO> Logistics Execution>Shipping>Basic Shipping Functions>Pricing--->Define Pricing Procedures for Delivery
    Regards,
    Prasanna

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I lock clips on the timeline?

    Hi, I am compiling music videos, taking the best grabs from 6 to 10 takes of a song which the band played along with the studio recording of the song. The sound track is therefore the synch mechanism. I am lining all the takes up above each other in

  • Transfer Custom OM Infotype data through ALE for HRMD_ABA Message type

    Hello Folks, I have created a Custom OM Infotype.When i run the PFAL transaction. All the standard infotype data is getting filled, but i dont see custom infotype data getting filled. Example: HRP9001 is the custom infotype. Please let me know the st

  • Imac as a monitor for a MacBook Pro

    I would like to use my 6 year old Imac as a monitor for my 1 yr old MacBook Pro.  Any suggestions as to how to hook this up?

  • WRITE ( f ) TO g .

    In the WRITE TO statement, WRITE (<f>) TO <g>. code-> <b>DATA: name(10)   TYPE c VALUE 'SOURCE_s',       source_s(10) TYPE c VALUE 'XYZ ',       target(10) TYPE c. WRITE (name) TO target. WRITE / target. <i>Output->XYZ ( value of source_s)</i></b> wi

  • Using DTW to change a sales order shipping address

    I found a template RDR12 and according to the di help file this seems to correspond to the addressextension object. I want to use this template to change the address information for an order. Either an existing order or a new order as it is imported.