Authority Object? Authorization Check for Period

We consolidated from R3 to SEM tax reporting. So we now are using a different authority-check object. However, all of the parameters that were in the 'Authorization Check for Period' in R3 are not in SEM. Can you manually add parameters for to the authority-check. I am not even sure how to change or activate. Is this a Basis thing?
To be honest I do not know what this object checks when processing. It cannot be debugged?
I do not think my authorization level will be fully defined with the new object.
Any suggestions?
          Thanks.
*In old ERP we used*
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'E_CS_PERMO'
   ID 'PERMO' FIELD '1'   "Open period
   ID 'DIMEN' FIELD g_dimen
   ID 'RVERS' FIELD g_rvers
   ID 'BUNIT' DUMMY
   ID 'CONGR' FIELD g_congr.
In new SEM system we now need to use:
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'R_UC_PERIO'
           ID 'ACTVT'     FIELD 'PA'          "open period
           ID 'CONS_AREA' FIELD g_congr.
          ID 'TASK_FLD1' FIELD '__________'
          ID 'TASK_FLD2' FIELD '__________'
          ID 'TASK_FLD3' FIELD '__________'
          ID 'TASK_FLD4' FIELD '__________'
          ID 'TASK_FLD5' FIELD '__________'
          ID 'TASK_FLD6' FIELD '__________'
          ID 'TASK_FLD7' FIELD '__________'
          ID 'TASK_FLD8' FIELD '__________'.

Resolved issue.

Similar Messages

How to turn off the authorization checks for a object in infoproviders?

Hi - how can I turn off the authorization check for an object (ex: 0orgunit) in infoproviders?
I have 0orgunit as an authorization-relevant object and is used in one of the cubes. When reports are run for this cube, this is causing authorization issues. The object is present in other cubes also but I have to remove or turn off the authorization check of this cube alone. How to do this? Please help.
Thanks,
Raj.

Hi Raj,
Srinivas, is right , however in BI7 the correct transaction is RSECADMIN and not RSADMIN.
In BW3.5, use RSSM transaction to do thins.
OR
Go to transaction RSECAUTH ---> Choose the authorization object that has been created for org unit(and has been assigned to the user). Go to change mode. Remove the cube from the dimension 0TCAIPROV
If you are using old authorization concept in 3.5 or in 7.0
Go to RSSM. In the checks for infoprovider, enter your infoprovider name. Choose change.Here you will see a checkbox to switch off the authorization.
Hope this helps you,
Best regards,
Sunmit.

Create authorization check for a report

Hi,
I need to create an authorization check for a report. It means that I need to restrict the usage of the report to couple of users ( 'USER1' and 'USER2' ). How can I do that? I did read through a lot of threads regarding this piece got a bit confused and stuck while creating the authorization object.
Say the report name is ZHR_TIMEABC.
Can anyone explain how to create an authorization object and how are they tied to the object and call them in the abap code?
Thanks in advance,
VG

Hi,
Thanks. Here is my understanding, S_C_FUNCT calls a system generated function module to make an authority check. So, if different users say USER1 and USER2 have different authroization levels, defined in their user profile, just adding this piece code will take care of authroization check for the program OR do I need to take care of something else?
If so, when do we need to create the authorization objects using SU20 and assign the group and follo this process? When do we use this approach ( lot of threads on authority check have mentioned this procedure)?
Your inputs will be helpful to understand this concept.
Thanks,
VG

Authorization check For T code

Hi everyone,
Can anybody guide to set a authorization check for a particular Tcode.
I have ztable where users are assigned particular numbers.
I want the users who are assigned some numbers should be able to use this particular t code
Thanks in advance

hi
chk this out
AUTHORITY-CHECK
Basic form
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT object
    ID name1 FIELD f1
    ID name2 FIELD f2
    ID name10 FIELD f10.
Effect
Explanation of IDs:
object
Field which contains the name of the object for which the authorization is to be checked.
name1 ...
Fields which contain the names of the
name10
authorization fields defined in the object.
f1 ...
Fields which contain the values for which the
f10
authorization is to be checked.
AUTHORITY-CHECK checks for one object whether the user has an authorization that contains all values of f (see SAP authorization concept).
You must specify all authorizations for an object and a also a value for each ID (or DUMMY).
The system checks the values for the IDs by AND-ing them together, i.e. all values must be part of an authorization assigned to the user.
If a user has several authorizations for an object, the values are OR-ed together. This means that if the CHECK finds all the specified values in one authorization, the user can proceed. Only if none of the authorizations for a user contains all the required values is the user rejected.
If the return code value in SY-SUBRC is 0, the user has the required authorization and may continue.
The return code value changes according to the different error scenarios. The return code values have the following meaning:
4
User has no authorization in the SAP System for such an action. If necessary, change the user master record.
8
Too many parameters (fields, values). Maximum allowed is 10.
12
Specified object not maintained in the user master record.
16
No profile entered in the user master record.
24
The field names of the check call do not match those of an authorization. Either the authorization or the call is incorrect.
28
Incorrect structure for user master record.
32
Incorrect structure for user master record.
36
Incorrect structure for user master record.
If the return code value is 8 or 24, inform the person responsible for the program. If the return code value is 4, 12, 16 or 24, consult your system administrator if you think you should have the relevant authorization. In the case of errors 28 to 36, contact SAP because authorizations have probably been destroyed.
Individual authorizations are assigned to users in their respective user profiles, i.e. they are grouped together in profiles which are stored in the user master record.
Note
Instead of ID name FIELD f, you can also write ID name DUMMY. This means that no check is performed for the field concerned.
The check can only be performed on CHAR fields. All other field types result in 'unauthorized'.
Example
Check whether the user is authorized for a particular plant. In this case, the following authorization object applies:
Table OBJ: Definition of authorization object
M_EINF_WRK
   ACTVT
   WERKS
Here, M_EINF_WRK is the object name, whilst ACTVT and WERKS are authorization fields. For example, a user with the authorizations
M_EINF_WRK_BERECH1
   ACTVT 01-03
   WERKS 0001-0003 .
can display and change plants within the Purchasing and Materials Management areas.
Such a user would thus pass the checks
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' FIELD '0002'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' DUMMY
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '01':
but would fail the check
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' FIELD '0005'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '04'.
To suppress unnecessary authorization checks or to carry out checks before the user has entered all the values, use DUMMY - as in this example. You can confirm the authorization later with another AUTHORITY-CHECK

Authorization Check for Special Stock Indicator in IE02

Dear Gurus,
Would like to check with you if there is an authorization check for change in Special Stock Indicator in IE02-SerData Tab?
For example, the User will only be allowed to change the Special Stock Indicator only to "E" - Sales Order.
Would appreciate your help.
Thanks.

Hi,
This cannot be done by using standard auth object. Standard SAP doesnt support control via this field.
Take help of your ABAP team and create an customized authorization object "Z_OBJECT" with field SOBKZ and which check these field value in table EQBS. Assign this auth object to role and profile you want.
Use the user exit IEQM0003 Additional checks before equipment update. Give a logic to check auth object when while using equipment change tcode.

Authorization checks for bank account number in vendor master

I am trying to find a way to set up authorization checks for specific fields in the vendor master: LFBK-BANKL, LFBK-BANKN, LFBK-EBPP_ACCNAME and LFBK-EBPP_ACCNAME. I am tring to set ip up so that if you have access to transactions FK03 or XK03, you can view vendor master data except for the above fields.
Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this? Your help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
-Peru

HI Peru,
To supress a field in FK03 u will have to check
Financial Accounting (New)>Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable>Vendor Accounts>Master Data>Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data-->Define Screen Layout per Activity (Vendors)
in that Display Vendor (Accounting) for FK03 and Display vendor (centrally) for Xk03
But there bank account no is not there.
Moreover there r no authorization objects for all the fields that u gave.
So try creating screen variant/ transaction variant in SHD0.
Regards,
Kiran

No ICF authorization CHECK for executing /sap/bc/bsp/sap/hap_document

In EP we are trying to access bsp
and we are getting error ,User T000209 (client 350) has no ICF authorization CHECK for executing /sap/bc/bsp/sap/hap_document
How to give authorization please help
venkateswararao

First Check is the ICF service is active using the SICF transaction.
Then Check for the authorization objects SAP_HR_HAP_EMPLOYEE
and SAP_HR_HAP_MANAGER.
Add the above roles to your user , it should work

How add Authorization check for user with assigened role for t.code-MIR4

Hi All,
Regarding authorization how to check authorizations check for user whith assigned roles for the t.code MIR4 using ABAP.
In Detail:2) All users are allowed to go to MIR4(invoice number), But ONLY for users with role: MM_RELEASE_INVOICE can proceed to do the posting.
suggest me...
Thanks,
srii..

Hi Sri ,
first u need to find out in which user rules u are using this object , after that if u want to restrict users then remove create/change values from that object values .
make use of Tcode SUIM to find out all roles which are using this Object.
or
ask ur basis guy to remove authorizations to create/change....
regards
Prabhu

Set Up Authorization Check for G/L Accounts into PO creation

Dear friends !
How could I activate check to the access to certain accounts into PO creation ?
I know that is possible to activate this into Purchasing customizing under path
SPRO > Materials management > Purchasing > Purchase order > Set Up Authorization Check for G/L Accounts
But could I use it to give access only to certain GL Accounts by user ? Is this the purpose of this customizing ?
If yes what´s the object should I use to link with user account !?
best regards,
Ale

Hi ,
After you setup the configuration in transaction OMRP, please setup up
the authorisation group in the account code (FS02, the field is on the
"Control", technical name is BEGRU).
When a account assigned purchase order is created, the system checks for
object F_BKPF_BES with values from the BEGRU and activity 01.

Authorization Check for Storage Location

Hi Experts,
I have the following requirement :-
I have Plant : P081 created under Company Code : P110.
I have got various Storage Locations under this Plant for example
KT01 - Main Stores
KT24 - Remote Store.
The KT24 store is basically a remote location store. I have activated the Authorization for the Storage Location KT24 in the SPRO Settings
Material Management --> Inventory Management and Physical Inventory --> Authorization Management --> Authorization check for storage location.
I have maintain the following authorizations for the Object M_MSEG_LGO as follows :-
1. OBJECT : M_MSEG_LGO.
>> 2. USER ID : 081Store
>> 3. PLANT : P081
>> 4. STORAGE LOCATION : Kt24
>> 5. ACTIVITY : 01-03
>> 6. MOVEMENT : 101, 102, 201, 221, 261
and authorization for T_code MIGO_GR and MIGO_GI . I want to restrict the user for transaction only for this storage location but the system is allowing the user to post GR document for KT01 stores also.
Can any one suggest a solution or settings that need to be done for the user to be restricted to prepared GR for Storage Location KT24 only.
Thanks in advance.
AJ

Hi,
You set the authorizations to users with tcode PFCG. To know the reason of deny some access run tcode SU53 after SAP denies the access to some documents / objects.
Regards,
Eduardo

Authorization check for production order settlement

Hi All,
Production order settlement currently can be done by any user of any company code. there is a high risk involved in the same since unauthorized postings may happen. Hence we need to add authorization check for production order settlement. Can we maintain the same at the plant or the company code level?
Waiting for your replies. Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Aman Goel

hi
What venki has told abt the exit, its absolutely correct.Even i have used the same exit
     From table CAUFV pick Material(PLNBEZ),Basic Start Date(GLTRP),Plant(WERKS) .
     Pass parameter Material(PLNBEZ) and Plant(Werks) in table MBEW in respective fields i.e. Material(MATNR) and Plant(WERKS).
     Pick the latest record for the current period(LFMON) and year(LFGJA).
     Pick Product Cost Estimate number(KALN1) from the record and pass it to table KEKO.
     Check if Production Order Basic Start Date(GLTRP)<= BIDAT, if NO post Error Message.
This is the FS for EXit PPco0007
Reward if useful
Amit

Authorization Check For Pricing Reference Materail In VA01 & VA02

Hi Expert,
User has requested to do authorization check for pricing reference material in line item in VA01/VA02. currently SAP does not has any authorization check for pricing reference material field at line item in VA01/VA02. Is there any standard authorization object for this purpose or needs to use user exit to do this checking ie if the pricing reference material entered does not belong to the sales org as entered in sales header data then system will issue warning/error message. What will be the standard user exit routine if there is no standard authorization object for this purpose ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Tay
Edited by: Hung How Tay on May 13, 2010 2:48 AM

Hi,
Try below in MV45AFZB
USEREXIT_SOURCE_DETERMINATION
Best regards,
Anupa

Authorization check for Removing of Delivery block in Sales Order

Hi,
I want to have an authorization check for the person removing the delivery block in the Sales Order.
By Default all Sales Orders will have a delivery block. I want to ensure that the user does not have the authorization to Remove the Delivery block.He should be able to choose any reason in the Delivery block if required.
Only the user which has the authorization to remove the delivery block should be able to do so.
I have checked that the Delivery block field does not have an Auth Object.
I want to enable delivery block removal for some users and restrict the same for others.
Please Advise

Hi,
In object V_VBAK_AAT you can find the activity 43 that is meant for authorisation, that should be removed for the users who are not supposed to release the sales order for any blocks.
Try that it will work.
Regards,
Mann.

Authorization check for action

HI Experts,
I am facing a Scenario, where PPF actions need to be restricted for users. For example, if there are 5 actions, I would like to have User A to execute the first 2 and User B to execute the other 3 alone.
Is there any authorization Object that i could make use of or is there any other way where i can achieve this.
Regards,
Kumar

Hello there,
for ChaRM I found 1002541, which provides extended authorization checks for tasks in the SCMA task list.
The code may be already in your system, but in the note you will find the names and descriptions of all the authorization objects.
Note 517491 might help as well.
Best regards,
Miguel Ariñ

Error :Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role whil

Hi Experts,
i m working as a portal resource .
after the deployment of standered Sap e-rec package .
i m getting some error. i have assigned the recruiter role to one test user.
Now i m getting two issue:
1)All the services are appearing in Detailed Navigation Pannel but not in Portal content area..
2) I m able to see few iview for the test user but those are also in detailed navigation view.
And few ivews are giving following error :
i)Internal error
ii)error 2011-12-19 07:59:57:315 ACCESS.ERROR: Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role [sap.com/com.sap.lcr*sld : LcrInstanceWriterNR] referencing J2EE security role [SAP-J2EE-Engine : administrators].
/System/Security/Audit/J2EE com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.audit n/a EP-DEV-KRT Server 0 0_97989
Full Message Text
ACCESS.ERROR: Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role [sap.com/com.sap.lcr*sld : LcrInstanceWriterNR] referencing J2EE security role [SAP-J2EE-Engine : administrators].
please suggest what can be done or what is pending from my side.

Prajakta2602 wrote:
Hi Experts,
>
> the previous issue got solved..
> it was due to servies pack miss match and applying notes
> the Basis guy checked the SLD logs and accordingly found that the base components J2EECORE and JTECHS required paching as per
> notes 1445294 and 1175239 were applied.
> now the issue is:
>
>
> After implemetation and i assigning the standerd sap roles
> 1)Recruiter Administrator
> 2)Recruiter
> to the test user .
> but for few iview it is showing error as in
> 1) you are not a authorized user
> 2) internal error
>
> please help experts.
>
> i m working on portal side have i to assign any role to that test user..
>
>
> Thnaks & Regards,
> Prajakta
You can run a quick check using the below steps:
1. Check in backend whether there is any authorisation errors... you may use transactions SU53 or ST22 for any ABAP errors
2. Also check in NWA -> log viewer -> last 24 hours log for the particular user to see any java related issues.
Regards,
Mahesh

Authority Object? Authorization Check for Period

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for