Authorization Check Failed for HR P_ORGIN on VDSK1

Hi Experts,
We have an issue where an HR secretary is making an address change to an employee via pa30.  She is successfully able to save the change with no warning on the screen.  However, when we run /nsu53 immediately after, we see that there was an authorization check failed.  The check failed is in class HR, object P_ORGIN.  The field is VDSK1.  We have values defined there, whereas SAP is requesting a *.  We do not want to use the *, but the value in VDSK1 is correct and should not be failing.
Anyone ever see this issue before?
Thanks
Shane

Hi Shane,
Since the secretary was able to save the record I assume there is no issue with the role. SU53 always shows last failed authorisation check. Even if transaction has been succesful you normally find failed authorisation checks from SU53. In your case I assume that PA30 checks first that if user happens to have P_ORGIN with * value in VDSK1. If not then it checks employees infotype 0001 and organisational key and tries to match that to the value in the role. If you pass this check SU53 will still show failed check where VDSK1=*.
So this is normal behaviour for SU53 and nothing to be worried about. Annoying is when SU53 gives something sill as last check after error. Annoying are SU53 reports from users to add S_DEVELOP with Debug object because programmer has decided to leave break-point to program.
cheers, s

Similar Messages

  • Authorization check failed

    hello experts!
    i created a program via smartforms but when my user try to generate a printed form an error message appear than FORM
    cannot be displayed. when i check Tcode: SU53 Authorization check failed.
    Object Class HR Human Resources
    Authorization Obj. P_ABAP  HR Reporting\
    Authorization Field COARS Degree of simplification for authorizaton check       1
    Authorization field REPID ABAP program name     ZHRPY00018C
    Please help on this one...
    How to fixed this
    Thank you

    hello...
    actually this report has 2 display a List display and via smartforms...
    we laready add this program  in her authorization profile... the only problem
    is when she try to generate the report via smartform she cannot produced the
    the output print docu. because an error appears that my FORM cannot be display.
    But when i check it in the development i can produced a test document.
    please help...

  • "ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed" on standalone WLS10.3.2

    Hi,
    After migrating from 11.1.1.1.0 to 11.1.1.2.0 we run into the following authorization problem:
    ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed: 'pages/UIShell.jspx' 'VIEW'. (as popup, logging at debug level doesn't give more info)
    This error occurs after the user has logged in with correct username/password, and continues from Home.jspx to UIShell.jspx.
    - When testing with JDeveloper on embedded WLS, everything works fine. But as soon as we deploy to standalone WLS 10.3.2, this problem starts.
    - We checked jazn-data.xml on the standalone WLS, but it no missing parts there compared to the 11.1.1.1.0 deployment version.
    - A difference between embedded WLS and standalone WLS is that for the standalone we use LDAP for user authentication. We had this setup working on 11.1.1.1.0, so what has changed?
    A similar situation is described here:
    ADF 11g security: deploy to WebLogic 10.3.1
    Any clues or directions?
    Thanks alot,
    Gerben

    I found a workaround for my problem. Because we're using custom authorization (JHeadstart) in our applications, we don't need adf authorization. So I've just simply set authorizationEnforce to "false" in adf-config.xml, which works in our case.
    Following blogposts helped alot:
    http://hardnoxjava.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-we-handled-adf-security.html
    http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2009/01/practical-adf-security-deployment-on.html
    -- Gerben

  • HCM Transfer process - Authorization Check Failed

    Hi All
        We are trying to run the Standard Transfer  process of HCM . We are trying to run the tcode u201C HRASR_TEST_PROCESSu201D  Can anybody Tell us what authorization objects does a user  require to run this process if the user does not have SAP_All Authorization.
    We have already added u201CP_ASRCONTu201DAuthorization object  as suggested by sap .
    We are failing in some HR authorization check but we have already added the same in useru2019s profile and it has already been genereated . 
    Note : We have already ran this process with SAP_All Authorization and it ran succesfully . Employee was Succesfully transferred to the new position .
    Please check the shreen  shots (click the links) below to get an idea of the problem .
    Authorization Check Failed :
    Link : [http://www.mediafire.com/?edtznzkmdm0]
    Process flow :
    Link : [http://www.mediafire.com/?ytxz3wlmjiz]
    Please click on " Click here to start download.. "  to check the screenshots.

    Hi, Mr. Joe Bo.
    Thanx for your reply. We are using ECC6 (HP Unix with Oracle)
    Basis Patch - 15, Kernel 159
    I have seen the the note but it's showing ccms method defination settings, but for my case we are yet to go live we have not made any settings from sap they are planning to run a session for the go live. When i am running sdcc i am getting a error in the system log "Failed to activate authorization check for user SAPSYS"
    Thanks & Regards
    Venkatesan J

  • ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed

    I am running JDeveloper 11.1.2.4
    ADF Security is enabled for the application.
    Security model is ADF Authentication and Authorization.
    I have created roles for employee, manager and admin.
    The roles are used to hide/display menu items and to allow/disallow access to task flows.
    I have dozens of task flows and this approach has worked well for some time.
    I added a new task flow that is accessible only to the admin role. The menu item is rendered only if the user is in the admin role. View access to the task flow is only granted to the admin role.
    As with new task flows in the past, I created and deployed an .ear file on my stand alone WLS. I then tested the functionality. This works as expected.
    I then gave the .ear file to our system admin to deploy on the sun server WLS. The deployment went fine but when I log in as an admin user and try to access the new menu item and task flow, the menu item is rendered but it says that the user is not authorized for the task flow.
    ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed: '/WEBINF/PlnDollarsSpentLineGraphTF.xml#PlnDollarsSpentLineGraphTF' 'VIEW'.
    Since the menu item is rendered I know that the user is assigned to the admin group. Access to all other menu items and task flows in the application is correct. Only having a problem with the new task flow.
    It would appear that the problem is with the .ear file rather than WLS. However, it works fine on my stand alone WLS and I looked at the jazn-data.xml file in the .ear file. It looks normal. The entry for the task flow looks like all the other task flow entries.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks for your help, Steve

    I examimed the system-jazn-date.xml file and found that the entry for the new task flow did not make it from the jazn-data.xml file into the system-jazn-data.xml file. I had the server system administrator do the deploy a second time. This time the system-jazn-date.xml file was updated properly and the new functionality is working.
    If anyone has an idea why system-jazn-date.xmp did not get updated in the first deployment I would be very interested.
    Thanks, Steve

  • ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed implementing popup through taskflow

    Hi All,
    I receive the error ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed: '/WEB-INF/main-task-flow-template.xml#main-task-flow-template' 'VIEW'. when accessing the taskflow that will show as a popup as described in this blog: http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2013/03/reusable-adf-region-with-dialog.html. I created a sample application and I have it working as expected.  The sample app has no security configured.  When I put the functionality into our main app the error occurs.  I have checked the jazn-data.xml and have granted a role to both the task flow and the web page.
    Our app is setup where I have a task flow template that most taskflows inherit from.  The calling page is inherited from the template which uses page fragments.  The taskflow for the popup is not inherited from the template and does not use page fragments.
    I am using 11.1.1.6.  The error happens when deploying to the Integrated server as well as a local WLS.  I read a few forum posts on this subject and some folks removed the anonymous role.  I have this role defined but is is only used for my login page so I don't want to remove it from there.
    Appreciate the help as this is blocking me from working on the functionality within the popup.
    Thank you - Rudy

    Resolved.  Our Application is setup as described by Jobinesh in the book "Oracle ADF Real World Developer's Guide".  In this case we have a separate application called "Common", within that we have projects for the ADFFrameWorkExtension, CommonModel, CommonUtilities and CommonUI.  The CommonUI project contains the main-task-flow-template and errorPage.jsff as well as the MainTemplate.jspx.  Each of these projects are deployed as a jar and imported into the main project.
    In the jazn-data.xml under Resource Grants, Resource Type = Task Flow, check the option to "Show task flows imported from ADF libraries".  This showed the main-task-flow-template which I granted the anonymous-role view action.
    When I run it now shows the popup.

  • Web Composer Admin Customization:'Authorization check failed' error

    Hi,
    The purpose of Web Composer Admin Customization is to enable the administration link in the UI pages so that the administrator will be able to customize the pages.
    The steps to be followed to enable admin customization in the required pages are given in the following link under the subheading 'Web Composer Admin Customization':
    https://stbeehive.oracle.com/teamcollab/wiki/Fusion+Applications+Technical+Architecture:Enabling+Customizations
    I ensured that:
    The jazn-data.xml file has a privilege role "FND_VIEW_ADMIN_LINK_PRIV", and a grant to access the admin menu.
    A duty role "FND_ADMINISTRATION_LINK_VIEW_DUTY" had been defined, and was a member of FND_VIEW_ADMIN_LINK_PRIV.
    The FND_ADMINISTRATION_LINK_VIEW_DUTY is inherited by the administrator enterprise role.
    A new privilege role (Customize <Family> UI) had been created.
    I then granted the 'customize' and 'personalize' actions on the pages and the corresponding task flows (for which customization had to be enabled) to the new privilege role.
    Also, ensured that:
    A new app role (Customize <Family> UI) was created and was a member of the new privilege role. The app role was inherited by the administrator enterprise role.
    The testing administrator role has both the administrator enterprise role and the enterprise role that has view access to the page.
    Now, when i tried to run one of the pages (for which customize and personalize actions were granted to the new privilege role) from JDeveloper, i got the following error:
    oracle.adf.controller.security.AuthorizationException: ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed: 'oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUFormDef@d94f3e' 'VIEW'.
    at oracle.adf.controller.internal.security.AuthorizationEnforcer.handleFailure(AuthorizationEnforcer.java:180)
    at oracle.adf.controller.internal.security.AuthorizationEnforcer.internalCheckPermission(AuthorizationEnforcer.java:160)
    at oracle.adf.controller.internal.security.AuthorizationEnforcer.checkPermission(AuthorizationEnforcer.java:114)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.state.ControllerState.checkPermission(ControllerState.java:632)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.state.ControllerState.initializeUrl(ControllerState.java:669)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.state.ControllerState.synchronizeStatePart2(ControllerState.java:447)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.application.SyncNavigationStateListener.afterPhase(SyncNavigationStateListener.java:46)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.lifecycle.ADFLifecycleImpl$PagePhaseListenerWrapper.afterPhase(ADFLifecycleImpl.java:531)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.internalDispatchAfterEvent(LifecycleImpl.java:120)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.dispatchAfterPagePhaseEvent(LifecycleImpl.java:168)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.faces.lifecycle.ADFPhaseListener$PhaseInvokerImpl.dispatchAfterPagePhaseEvent(ADFPhaseListener.java:124)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.faces.lifecycle.ADFPhaseListener.afterPhase(ADFPhaseListener.java:70)
    at oracle.adfinternal.controller.faces.lifecycle.ADFLifecyclePhaseListener.afterPhase(ADFLifecyclePhaseListener.java:53)
    at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:398)
    at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:185)
    When i granted the view action on the page ( in addition to the customize and personalize actions) to the new privilege role and ran the page from JDeveloper, the page came up fine but the administration link that is supposed to appear was not seen.
    Can any of you please provide suggestions regarding the cause of the above error and how i should go about debugging it.
    Thanks,
    Rohan

    Posted it in the forum suggested by Frank.

  • ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed: 'oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUFormDef

    JDev version : 11.1.1.4
    WLS : 10.3.4
    Hi All,
    Recently we have migrated JDev from 11.1.1.3 to 11.1.1.4 and WLS from 10.3.3 to 10.3.4. We had security enabled in our application and use to work without any issues in our previous version (before migration). We are getting below error after migration and not able to access our application.
    Error 500--Internal Server Error
    oracle.adf.controller.security.AuthorizationException: ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed: 'oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUFormDef@d856cd' 'VIEW'.
    We get this exception as soon as log in is successful. We have tried with different users including administrator who has complete permissions but got same exception. Note that same application is working in previous version.
    Please help us in resolving this issue. Below I have mentioned complete stack trace.
    More details:
    Policy store : jaxz-data.xml
    Identity store : integrated WLS LDAP
    WLS : standalone WLS
    Error 500--Internal Server Error
    oracle.adf.controller.security.AuthorizationException: ADFC-0619: Authorization check failed: 'oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUFormDef@d856cd' 'VIEW'.
         at oracle.adf.controller.internal.security.AuthorizationEnforcer.handleFailure(AuthorizationEnforcer.java:180)
         at oracle.adf.controller.internal.security.AuthorizationEnforcer.internalCheckPermission(AuthorizationEnforcer.java:160)
         at oracle.adf.controller.internal.security.AuthorizationEnforcer.checkPermission(AuthorizationEnforcer.java:114)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.state.ControllerState.checkPermission(ControllerState.java:632)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.state.ControllerState.initializeUrl(ControllerState.java:669)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.state.ControllerState.synchronizeStatePart2(ControllerState.java:447)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.application.SyncNavigationStateListener.afterPhase(SyncNavigationStateListener.java:46)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.lifecycle.ADFLifecycleImpl$PagePhaseListenerWrapper.afterPhase(ADFLifecycleImpl.java:531)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.internalDispatchAfterEvent(LifecycleImpl.java:120)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.dispatchAfterPagePhaseEvent(LifecycleImpl.java:168)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.faces.lifecycle.ADFPhaseListener$PhaseInvokerImpl.dispatchAfterPagePhaseEvent(ADFPhaseListener.java:124)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.faces.lifecycle.ADFPhaseListener.afterPhase(ADFPhaseListener.java:70)
         at oracle.adfinternal.controller.faces.lifecycle.ADFLifecyclePhaseListener.afterPhase(ADFLifecyclePhaseListener.java:53)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:398)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:185)
         at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:265)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
         at oracle.adf.model.servlet.ADFBindingFilter.doFilter(ADFBindingFilter.java:205)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.rich.RegistrationFilter.doFilter(RegistrationFilter.java:106)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$FilterListChain.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:446)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.activedata.AdsFilter.doFilter(AdsFilter.java:60)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$FilterListChain.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:446)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._doFilterImpl(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:271)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:177)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter.doFilter(TrinidadFilter.java:92)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
         at oracle.adf.library.webapp.LibraryFilter.doFilter(LibraryFilter.java:175)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
         at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter$1.run(JpsAbsFilter.java:111)
         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         at oracle.security.jps.util.JpsSubject.doAsPrivileged(JpsSubject.java:313)
         at oracle.security.jps.ee.util.JpsPlatformUtil.runJaasMode(JpsPlatformUtil.java:413)
         at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.runJaasMode(JpsAbsFilter.java:94)
         at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.doFilter(JpsAbsFilter.java:161)
         at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsFilter.doFilter(JpsFilter.java:71)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
         at oracle.dms.servlet.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:136)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestEventsFilter.doFilter(RequestEventsFilter.java:27)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3715)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3681)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2277)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2183)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1454)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:207)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:176)

    Usually, the security policy of the application is bundled in the EAR file. When you deploy the application the security policy is automatically migrated (e.g. added) to domain's security policy repository (e.g. <tt>system-jazn-data.xml</tt> file, if neither LDAP or DB repository is used). Also when you undeploy an application its security policy is removed from domain's security policy repository.
    My practical experience says that both of these happen only if the application has been targetted to WLS domain's admin server (i.e. if the application is targetted only to managed servers but not to the admin server, then the security policy is neither migrated nor removed).
    The trick I apply is to do the following:
    (1) Target and deploy the application to the admin server (so the security policy is migrated into <tt>system-jazn-data.xml</tt>);
    (2) Copy the migrated application's policy section from <tt>system-jazn-data.xml</tt> to the clipboard;
    (3) Undeploy the application from the admin server (the security policy is removed from <tt>system-jazn-data.xml</tt> in result);
    (4) Paste the security section back into <tt>system-jazn-data.xml</tt> file and save it;
    (5) Deploy the application to managed servers;
    (6) Restart the servers.
    (It is not necessary to undeploy the application at step 3, it is enough to remove the admin server from application's targets).
    I am not sure that this is the right approach, but it works and I have not found anything in the documentation about this topic.
    One more thing - the automatic migration of the security policy that is included in the EAR is controlled by the following parameter in <tt>weblogic-application.xml</tt> file:
    <application-param>
        <param-name>jps.policystore.migration</param-name>
        <param-value>OVERWRITE</param-value>
    </application-param>The policy is not migrated if this parameter is not set.
    If you deploy the application from JDeveloper, it will not be necessary to set this parameter in <tt>weblogic-application.xml</tt> manually because JDeveloper will do it for you. Just open the Application Properties dialog in JDev, go to page "Deployment" and check the checkbox "Application Policies". Then JDeveloper will automatically add this parameter into <tt>weblogic-application.xml</tt> file within the EAR files generated from this time onwards (do not be confused that it will not be added to the file in the IDE).
    Dimitar

  • Post install checks failed for DBC file - Oracle App11.5.10.2 Linux  5.3

    Hi everybody,
    I tried Installing Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3
    The Post install checks failed for DBC file, HTTP, JSP and PHP. Apparently the DBC hadn’t been created. I had verified the log file, while executing adgendbc.sh, it throwing below error.
    Generating /jith/d01/oracle/appl/visappl/fnd/11.5.0/secure/prithvi.bangalore.bedford.local_vis.dbc
    DBC generation failed with exit code 127
    Generating /jith/d01/oracle/appl/visappl/fnd/11.5.0/secure/prithvi_vis.dbc
    DBC generation failed with exit code 127
    Updating Server Security Authentication
    Updating Server Security Authentication failed with exit code 127
    adgendbc.sh exiting with status 127
    ERRORCODE = 127 ERRORCODE_END
    .end std out.
    touch: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    sqlplus: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    mkdir: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    sed: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    /jith/d01/oracle/appl/viscomn/util/java/1.4/j2sdk1.4.2_04/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libpthread.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    cp: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    /jith/d01/oracle/appl/viscomn/util/java/1.4/j2sdk1.4.2_04/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libpthread.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    cp: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    /jith/d01/oracle/appl/viscomn/util/java/1.4/j2sdk1.4.2_04/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libpthread.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    cp: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    /jith/d01/oracle/appl/viscomn/util/java/1.4/j2sdk1.4.2_04/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libpthread.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    /jith/d01/oracle/appl/viscomn/util/java/1.4/j2sdk1.4.2_04/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libpthread.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    .end err out.
    Thanks in advance.
    sreejith

    Welcome to the forums !
    Pl post EBS related question in the EBS forums at http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=3
    HTH
    Srini

  • RME 4.3.1 device update failing 'WARNING : Cat3560(7.3):Consistency check failed for base package SharedNetshowIOS'

    Hi Guys,
    I'm having some issues updating the device packages for my RME 4.3.1 install.
    I've downloaded and tried to update the 'Cat3560.zip' package via the GUI, but the job fails with the above error.
    I pulled up the PSU.log and found the following:
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURCMVER=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMF Package Map Available.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMVERSION=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : VERSION=4.3
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : PATCHVER=1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURCMVER=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMF Package Map Available.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMVERSION=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for CM already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for CVW already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURDFMVER=3.2.0
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMF Package Map Available.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : DFMVERSION=3.2.0
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : VERSION=4.3
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : PATCHVER=1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for RME already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for CVW already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : VERSION=4.3
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : PATCHVER=1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for RME already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages]  : Locking package repository..
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageInstaller : installStep_resolve]  : Checking Dependencies...
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : SharedSwim2900XL has 17 dependent packages
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ImageParserAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[SharedDcmaIOS] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package SharedDcmaIOS
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[DistributionAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[LibSwim] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package LibSwim
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SwimJobOptionsAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ImageAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SoftwareAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ConfigAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[LibCommon] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package LibCommon
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SystemAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ImageListAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ContainmentAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[FlashAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[MemoryAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[RemoteStageAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SwimCCOAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[SharedSwimIOS] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package SharedSwimIOS
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [PsuPkgResolver : pickLatest]  : No packages to pick ..Empty package set passed .
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : populateResolverResult]  : All selected packages failed consistency check..
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [SimpleProgress : progressInfo]  : Progress: WARNING: SharedSwim2900XL(2.2.3): Consistency check failed for base package SharedDcmaIOS
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageInstaller : installStep_resolve]  : Packages selected for install (satisfies consistency check) : []
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [SimpleProgress : progressInfo]  : Progress: No packages to be installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages]  : Creating maps in D:\CSCOpx\www\classpath\com\cisco\nm\xms\psu\pkgs\rme
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.7.5.19 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6010 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6020 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6030 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7101 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.8110 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6040 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7102 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7201 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6050 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7103 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7301 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6060 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7203 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7401 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7501 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7303 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7213 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6070 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7502 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7223 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7503 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7504 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : * not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:31 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.99999999 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6010 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6020 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6030 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7101 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.8110 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6040 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7102 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7201 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6050 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7103 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7301 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6060 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7203 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7401 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7501 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7303 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7213 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6070 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7502 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7223 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7503 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7504 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages]  : Releasing lock...
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DeviceSupportHistory : init]  : Loading history db fromD:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\xms\psu\conf\historyDB
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DeviceSupportHistory : init]  : Number of Events Loaded in init()6
    Before i started to bug TAC, I figured I'd post this here.
    Let me know your thoughts

    Looks like your package repository has been corrupted.  TAC can provide a procedure  to recover from this corruption.  The following DOC indicates  why this can happen and has suggestions on how to avoid these problems  from re-occuring.

  • Result: User equivalence check failed for user "oracle".

    While installing on Solaris-10, ssh, rlogin, scp works fine.
    Running runcluvfy.sh stage -post hwos -n rac-1,rac-2 -verbose returns the above error.
    Result: User equivalence check failed for user "oracle".
    ERROR:
    User equivalence unavailable on all the nodes.
    Verification cannot proceed.
    /bin/ssh & /bin/scp is in use.

    Hello,
    I am facing User equivalence check failed for user "oracle" error on my newly to be built RAC cluster.
    The Oracle users have been created identically and ssh have been setup as per RAC installation manual.
    Still I am facing the below problem. Please help me out
    Node1 > uname -a
    Linux purple-rac-node2 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Mon Mar 29 22:10:29 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    Node2 > uname -a
    Linux purple-rac-node1 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Mon Mar 29 22:10:29 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    clusterware/cluvfy/runcluvfy.sh stage -post hwos -n purple-rac-node1,purple-rac-node2 -verbose
    Performing post-checks for hardware and operating system setup
    Checking node reachability...
    Check: Node reachability from node "purple-rac-node1"
      Destination Node                      Reachable?
      purple-rac-node2                         yes
      purple-rac-node1                         yes
    Result: Node reachability check passed from node "purple-rac-node1".
    Checking user equivalence...
    Check: User equivalence for user "oracle"
      Node Name                             Comment
      purple-rac-node2                         failed
      purple-rac-node1                         failed
    Result: User equivalence check failed for user "oracle".
    ERROR:
    User equivalence unavailable on all the nodes.
    Verification cannot proceed.
    [oracle@purple-rac-node1 ~]$ id oracle
    uid=501(oracle) gid=501(dba) groups=501(dba),502(oper),503(oinstall)
    [oracle@purple-rac-node2 ~]$ id oracle
    uid=501(oracle) gid=501(dba) groups=501(dba),502(oper),503(oinstall)

  • RUNCLUVFY  Result: PRVF-4007 : User equivalence check failed for user "orac

    hello
    try to run runcluvfy.sh I receive the following screen rac2 is passed but rac 1 is failed can sombody help me?
    thanks
    [oracle@rac1 grid]$ ./runcluvfy.sh stage -pre crsinst -n rac1,rac2 -verbose
    Performing pre-checks for cluster services setup
    Checking node reachability...
    Check: Node reachability from node "rac1"
    Destination Node Reachable?
    rac2 yes
    rac1 yes
    Result: Node reachability check passed from node "rac1"
    Checking user equivalence...
    Check: User equivalence for user "oracle"
    Node Name Comment
    rac2 passed
    rac1 failed
    Result: PRVF-4007 : User equivalence check failed for user "oracle"
    WARNING:
    User equivalence is not set for nodes:
    rac1
    Verification will proceed with nodes:
    rac2
    Checking node connectivity...

    Check this older thread which has a lot of information on this:
    User equivalence check failed (RAC setup)

  • CLUVFY failing with 'User Equivalence check failed for...'

    New 2 node RAC configuration. Oracle 10gR2, Linux RHEL 5 x64. I'm at the post hardware config, pre install clusterware stage.
    Running the cluster verification utility command:
    cluvfy comp sys -n node-01,node-02 -p crs -verboseReturns the following error:
    Verifying system requirement
    ERROR:
    User equivalence unavailable on all the nodes.
    Verification cannot proceed.
    Verification of system requirement was unsuccessful on all the nodes.I've verified the following:
    1) RSA keys correctly configured on both nodes and I can ssh between without a password
    2) ping ip and private work correctly to and from both nodes.
    3) user, group ids are identical on both systems.
    I also ran cluvfy stage -post hwos -n node-01,node-02 -verbose and received the following output. This output is from node-01. node-02's is identical, except with equivalence to itself failing.
    Checking node reachability...
    Check: Node reachability from node "node-01"
      Destination Node                      Reachable?
      node-02                       yes
      node-01                       yes
    Result: Node reachability check passed from node "node-01".
    Checking user equivalence...
    Check: User equivalence for user "oracle"
      Node Name                             Comment
      node-02                       passed
      node-01                       failed
    Result: User equivalence check failed for user "oracle".
    WARNING:
    User equivalence is not set for nodes:
            node-01
    Verification will proceed with nodes:
            node-02
    Checking node connectivity...I get the same behavior on both nodes. Not quite sure what else to check. Any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks.

    No, no banners. And I followed note 300548.1 to the letter. Several times :-)
    However, I believe my issue has to do with a CVUHOME/cv/admin/cvu_config.
    According to the documentation:
    CV_XCHK_FOR_SSH_ENABLED—If set to TRUE, it enables the X-Windows check for verifying user equivalence with ssh. By default, this entry is commented out and X-Windows check is disabledIt was not, unfortunately, disabled by default - once I set it to false, everything succeeded. I still need to figure out why XCHK itself is failing, but I think I can troll through the log to figure that out.

  • Result: PRVF-4007 : User equivalence check failed for user "oracle"

    Hi
    I get below error everytime I run ./cluvfy stage -pre crsinst -n node01,node02 -fixup -verbose > a.log
    Checking user equivalence...
    Check: User equivalence for user "oracle"
    Node Name Comment
    node02 passed
    node01 failed
    Result: PRVF-4007 : User equivalence check failed for user "oracle"
    WARNING:
    User equivalence is not set for nodes:
    node01
    Verification will proceed with nodes:
    node02
    node01 is the local node, if I run from node02 It comes back saying the same thing about node2!
    I have checked oracle uid and groups all set correctly and ssh working fine ...
    I have ran the same command for grid user and getting the same error !!

    i know what it was, i should have done ssh localnode date for once at least!!
    I only did ssh remotenode date :)

  • PRVF-4007 : User equivalence check failed for user "grid"

    Oracle Version 11.2.0.3.0 patched to 11.2.0.3.1
    I had installed GIU and RAC db on 2 node cluster
    but since yesterdy has this issue when running the commands
    [grid@vmorarac2 ~]$ cluvfy comp ocr -n all -verbose
    Verifying OCR integrity
    ERROR:
    PRVF-4008 : User equivalence unavailable on all the specified nodes
    Verification cannot proceed
    vmorarac1 and vmorarac2 r the two nodes
    as a grid user, from vmorarac1 i ran ssh vmorarac2 and it failed with above error and vice versa
    so i did the following
    from vmorarac1
    ssh vmorarac2
    yes and enter key
    exec /usr/bin/ssh-agent $SHELL
    /usr/bin/ssh-add
    i did the same on other node
    but the problem still exists.
    Edited by: 912919 on 23-May-2012 06:58

    Hi,
    The subject of thread "*PRVF-4007 : User equivalence check failed for user "grid*"
    Now..
    {code}
    PRVF-4657 : Name resolution setup check for "vmorarac-scan.pbi.global.pvt" (IP address: 152.144.199.201) failed
    PRVF-4664 : Found inconsistent name resolution entries for SCAN name "vmorarac-scan.pbi.global.pvt"
    PRVF-4664 : Found inconsistent name resolution entries for SCAN name "vmorarac-scan.pbi.global.pvt"
    {code}
    If you can see are different issue.
    If you are using DSN to resolve hostname "vmorarac-scan.pbi.global.pvt" check with "nslookup" if the name is resolved correctly.
    If you are using Hosts File to resolve hostname "vmorarac-scan.pbi.global.pvt" you must configure only one ip (152.144.199.201) to resolve "vmorarac-scan.pbi.global.pvt" this entrie must be on host file of all nodes of cluster.
    Levi Pereira

Maybe you are looking for

  • HT3696 I have a Core Duo 32bit system. Is there anyway to upgrade to a 64bit?

    It seems I jumped on the new Intel based Minis too soon. I have upgraded all that I can...that I know at least. I have 10.6.8. An Intel, but its only Core Duo. I wanted to buy some apps, but it seems they all require 64bit!!!...at least the ones I ha

  • How can we access the file/directory system in the server

    Hi friends, I have made a text editor attached with an audio player for my project. Both text editor and audio player are implemented in applet and put in to a jsp page using jsp:plugin. Text editor and player are separate applets running in the same

  • Screen defaults resets to low resolution

    I was working on my computer tonight, and my background picture changed, and the screen went to what appears to be a 256 color display, although it still appears to be 1440 x 900. The images and text are awful. I've checked the settings in the system

  • Can't reset display after online game

    I just tried an online demo of Runescape (web-based online adventure game). It seems to have changed my display settings -- my display is now a little blurry, maybe slightly stretched, and sort of unstable (when I move the mouse, the display wavers a

  • Temperature Rises with audio

    Hi! When you ear some music in your machine the temperature rises from 87F to 136F. Some people refer this to iTunes but i tested with other audio software and is the same thing. ex: Cog, VLC, etc... Is this normal????? I know this processor can take