Authorization in CJ88 by Processing type

Hello,
Our customer requires to split authorization roles for settlement processing by Processing type in CJ88. So, one group of users should be able to use only periodical settlement (automatic and by period), and another one only final (partly and final capitalization).
Does anybody know how to do it?
Thanks in advance!
DD

HI
One option is you can havetwo test user ids and test those requirements. Let you basis team starts the trace and find what are all objects it passes throgh during performing settlement run.
Hope that will work and discuss with your basis team.
Regards,
PSR

Similar Messages

CJ88 Settlement Processing Type

Hi,
I would like to know the correct "Processing Type" to specify in Actual Settlement run (CJ88) for settling to Asset Under Construction (AUC) and Final Asset. Please confirm if it is correct to use "By Period" for settling to AUC and use "Full Settlement" to settle to Final Assets.
Thanks!
Vivian

we enter processing type in the intial screen of project settlement which controlls the settlement process.
With processing type By period : only distribution rules with settlement types to PER ( Periodic Settlement ), PRE( preliminary settlement ) & AUC ( Asset under settlement ) are taken in to account.
How ever settlement to AUC will happens at last. So, if with this sequence if you have maintained any settlement type PRE( Preliminary ) , it will consider it first & therefoe settle cost portions that are not to be capitalised.
If I say in the context of your question,
With the first settlement of WBs sys automaticallty generates a distribution rules for the settlement type AUC. If you don't want to settle all the cost of WBS to AUC, you must enter additional distribution rule for the debit to other receivers that are not to be capitalised. Use settlement type PRE ( Preliminary ) to ensure that these distribution rules are taken into account before the settlement to AUC.
Once the Assset under construction Phase is completed, create a completed asset. We does the same in Cj20n. next, define the distribution rules in the WBS element with settlement type FUL for the cost portion to be capitalised and enter the completed asset as receiver.
Not that distribution rule with settlement type FUL is only taken in to account in the project settlement if you ahve used Partial Capitalisation / automatic as the processing type
So, in short
when you want to settle to AUC use the distribution rules with settlement type AUC (generated by sys) & processing type periodic
when you want to settle to FXA you should use the settlement type Full & processing type partail capitalisation / automatic.
However the processing type Full settlement is used for the settlement rules with distribution rules of settlement type PER ( Periodic ) only, in to check weather the balance still exists in the object after the settlement due to debits to previous periods.
So, don't get confued with settlement type FUL (full settlement ) & processing type Full settlement. ( processing type full settlement has nothing to do with AUC )
Regards
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Patoliya on Dec 12, 2008 9:43 AM

Variables with Authorization as Processing type ...

Hi Gurus, I also wanted to see if we have any good example for this kind of variable?
I also have a question. If we have Authorizations on 0ORGUNIT and 0EMPLOYEE. The users will be able to see only what they are supposed to see. Now what is the use of a variable that is built on this chareacteristics with processing type "Authorization"? Since they already are restricted to see the data?

Consider this example:
Every cost center manager should only be allowed to evaluate data for his/her cost center. Within the SAP authorization standard, a role or a profile with the authorization for the InfoObject 0COSTCENTER equal to XXXX (XXXX stands for the particular cost center) would have to be made for every cost center manager X. This has to be entered in the user master data for the cost center manager. In organizations where cost centers change on a regular basis, this involves significant administrative effort.
Using a variable reduces the authorization maintenance workload with the InfoObject 0COSTCENTER equal to $VARCOST, as well as with the role or the profile, which is maintained for all cost center managers. The value of the variable VARCOST is then set for runtime during the authorization check by the CUSTOMER-EXIT RSR00001.
Maintaining the authorizations restricts the entries for the values to the length of the existing InfoObject. It is possible, however, to use both limits of the interval. In the example 0COSTCENTER with 4 spaces, the variable VARCOST is, therefore, entered as $VAR COST.
refer:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/91/a62c42fb6fdd2ce10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm for more details

BEX Variable processing type Authorization

Hello ,
Currently we have Company code as Authorization relevant and we have BEX Variable of processing type "Authorization". currently when user executes the BEX query, he is able to see list of company codes which he as authorization to and all of them were selected in the prompts. Now the requirement is, User want to see list of company codes which he as authorization to in F4 but nothing should have been pre-selected in the prompt, he will select manually the company codes what he wants.
please guide me how to achieve this.
Thanks,
Ashok Kumar

Actually, the default values(in Bex) are bound to appear as per RSECADMIN definition. That's how it behaves. To try in a different way for your Authorizations, you may try with a BADI with all Authorized values in the code. Please search below document in SCN.
Restricting F4 (Input Help) Values While Running a SAP BW Query

Use of RSSM and authorisation processing type

I create a authorisation object for customer using RSSM. At the report level, I want to create a variable on the "customer".
If I create a User Entry/default value processing type for the characteristic variable on "Customer", how will the system handle data restriction checks for different roles for "Customer".
Or to make my question better,
Are authorisation objects created in RSSM useful for only Variables with "Authorisation" processing type.
Thanks
Simmi

hi Simmi,
no, it's useful in infocube level, in rssm we mark which infocube(s), all queries to the infocube will have authorization check. processing type authorization will display report with restriction to all values given to the user.
to restrict user by e.g customer, you need to maintain in role (transaction PFCG), choose created authorization object (RSSM), and assign value, and assign the role to your user.
e.g role ZCUST, user A given cust1, user B given cust2 and so on.
hope this helps.

Authorization object for manual condition type in sale order

Hi experts
I want ask them, If exist an authorization object for manual Condition type (KOMV-KSCHL) in the sales order (VA01/VA02), that the user don' t can create neither modify the sale orden with a specific manual condition type (payment term) by stardard way.
Best regards
John Angulo

HI John,
I would be surprised to know that someone uses the Payment terms as a condition in the Pricing procedure for sales orders. The payment terms define when the customer agrees to pay, (15, 20, 45 ,....days or 5 years or 10 years....whatever it be)
this detail for what i know is in the sales order header,and ideally has nothing to do with the Item level material price conditions.
its ok, If you mean something else by payment terms.....in principle you can have a conditon type restrcited such that manual entries on the condition are not possible. this cane be done in SPRO customizing, i am sure your functional consultants would know what to do (SPRO->Sales and Distribution->Basic Function->Condition Types), in the tab "Changes that can be made" have a value that says manual Processing is not allwowed
The ABAP route mentioned above is for a different scenarion and i dont think it is necessary for your requirement

Variables & Processing Types

Hi,
I am looking for variables & Processing types.Could any one guide me on Variables & Processing types in BI 7.0.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Vijji

Hi Vijji,
We have five types of variables in BI 7.0
1) Characteristic value variables
2) Text Variables
3) Hierarchy variables
4) Hierarchy node variables
5) Formula variables
we can pass the values to this variables using 5 processing types
1) Manual Entry/ Default value
2) Replacement path
3) Authorizations
4) Customer exits
5) SAP Exit
In the below link you can check which process type is varilable for which variable.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/579b3c494d8e15e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards,
Venkatesh

User has no authorization to send IDOCS of type

Hi Gurus,
I am sending an IDOC of type OILDEB02 from XI to R/3. I have done the configuration (we20, we21 etc). The message is processing successfully and not reaching the R/3.
When I checked in IDX5, after cclicking the 'transaction id', i see this message.
Caller: XIAFUSER
No authorization to send IDOCS of type OILDEB02.
Do we need to create the XI service users in the R/3 system?
I wanted to know what is missed in this configuration?
Thanks
Kalyan

Bhavesh,
I am using File to IDOC interface.
I have checked all the items you mentioned. Everything is working as expected.
<i>1. The rfc destination and port in the IDOC adapter are the valid ones you have created for the R3 system in Sm59 and IDX1 respectively
***THESE ARE VALID
2. Go to IDX2 and try to manually import the Idoc metadata. See if this is successful.
MANUAL IMPORT IS SUCCESSFUL
3. In the RC destination in Sm59, try a test connection and remote log on.
TEST CONNECTION AND REMOTE LOG ON WERE SUCCESSFUL.
4. Finally check if the user id has the roles mentioned in my porevious reply and if yes, things should work.
I didn't check this on. But there was no error regarding my user id.
</i>
After I run the interface, XI is showing the processing successful and the IDOC is not received at R/3.
When I checked in IDX5 in XI, after clicking the transaction id, the message is saying that -
Caller XIAFUSER
Function module: IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS
Target system: R/3 SYSTEM RFC destination I have created in XI
Status text: No authorization to send IDocs with message type OILDEB
Any thoughts??
Thanks
Kalyan

Custom Process Types not working in SAP BPC 10.0

Hi Experts,
We have migrated from SAP BPC 7.5 NW to SAP BPC 10.0 NW.
We have three Custom Process Types created in BPC 7.5NW using the super class CL_UJD_SIMPLE_ACTOR as super class.
It has been made Obsolete and Final class in BPC 10.0NW and the Custom Process types are not running as expected.
Can you please suggest if there is any alternative for using the existing custom process types? Or do we have any alternative for creating custom process types?
*Note: We have tried replacing the superclass with CL_UJD_ACTOR instead of CL_UJD_SIMPLE_ACTOR but of no use.
Regards,
Balraj.

Hi Inl,
The statement looks fine, just confirm:
Your CATEGORY dimension is named CATEGORY? Is it really has property COMPARISOIN?
Can you show the screenshot of UJKT run of script?
What is your core BPC SP?
Vadim

BI custom process type (ABAP OO Class): how to create a variant screen?

I created a custom process type in Netweaver 2004s (business intelligence) which in essence is nothing but an Abap class that implements certain interfaces. What I am now struggling with is how to write the code for the "new variant" input screen.
My understanding is that the logic has to be implemented in the method IF_RSPC_MAINTAIN~MAINTAIN, but I am lacking detailed information.
Can someone give me an example with a variant screen that displays two radio buttons?
Thank you,
D.

It is a custom class that implements the following interfaces:
IF_RSPC_GET_VARIANT
IF_RSPC_MAINTAIN
IF_RSPC_EXECUTE
The interface I am struggling with is the first one (get variant). Any more insight on how this should be used would be highly appreciated.
Thanks!

How to capture the process type for a particular application

In my application CRMD_BUS2000120 there are 3 process types namely incidents, zcomplaints and zrepair order. But all the 3 display the same description as New: Incidents . Since this is attached with the application name. How can i change the description according to the process type i select. If I select incidents the description should be Incident , if i select zcomplaints it should be zcomplaints. Can anyone guide me how to do this.
Thanks in Advance,
Anu

Hi Fred,
If you open any activities or opportunities, you can see the description if you select new button and click on the process type. It will be display Activities and below that New: Activity. Instead of always displaying the same description I want to override the description according to the process type. For me the application is not activity but Incident. Hope I am clear with the question.
Thanks,
Anu

Charateristic variable with Processing type "replacement path"

Hi all
I am using BI 7.0;
I have a characteristic ZPL_CNT in one dimensions of a Cube;
now i want to use the value of the ZPL_CNT as column in Query.
So i created a formula and a formula variable with replacement path of processing type:
setting:
i created a new formula "Calculated MBZ"
the formula variables is "ZMBZ" and inserted the variables into "Calculated MBZ"
Reference characteristic: ZPL_CNT
Processing type : Replacement path
Replace variable with: Attribute value
Attribute: characteristic Reference (constant 1)
But i find the value in Query incorrect
Can anyone help me solve this problem?
Thanks!

Hi Dragon,
Can you not drag and drop this characteristic directly in the columns...have I misunderstood something?
I think when you use replacement path in the formula variable , the fromula variable tries to find the reference characteristic value at each record level in the report and then replaces it with attribute value as defined and may be in your case as the characteristice is not defined in the row , it has problems to identify which value of the characteristic it has to replace.
Regards,
Sunmit.

Email Alert for Process Chain for ABAP Process Type

Hi BW Experts,
                         I created a process chain based on ABAP Process Type ( for Broadcasting rsrd_broadcast_starter). I want to add alert message for each ABAP process if it is failed. But I cant see any option showing Successfull or Error or Always when I select create message option on the process type. How ever I can see for other process chain which is loading data (Process Type is Info Package ) from SAP into BW.
                         Please some one tell me why it is not showing alert message for ABAP Process Type.
Thanks
Ganesh Reddy.
Edited by: Ganesh Reddy on Jul 13, 2009 10:16 PM

I dont have the exact answer for your question, But as a work around i can suggest you that.
If these ABAP programs are included in a chain and this local chain is a part of meta chain then you can create a message on the local chain.By right clicking on the local chain >Create Message>Success
                                                                                --->Failure
>Always
Hope this resolves the problem tempervorly.I will get back to you once i have
Or the permanent solution is
Its big and also easy method to perform, by this you will be able to get all the options for a ABAP Program also.If you have any questions please let me know.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/business-intelligence/a-c/creating%20an%20abap%20process%20type%20for%20process%20chains%20in%20bi.pdf

What is the difference between Process Type TRIGGER AND CHAIN

What is the difference between these two process types. When I am looking process types, I want to provide information only about process chains and not individual steps of process chain. Looks like one can do using either.
Along the same line, I am looking at data from RSPCPROCESSLOG, no where this table has a column process chain id. So How od I find information about a process chain.
Thanks a lot,

A "Chain Process" can be a a step in a Process Chain as well. For Example: So you could have the following Process Chain:
Process Chain Example
Step 1. TRIGGER (Execute Daily at 4am)
Step 2. DTP_LOAD Execute DSO Load
Step 3. DTP_LOAD Execute InfoCube Load
Step 4. CHAIN Execute Master Data Process Chain
I believe the "Master Chain" is called a "MetaChain" since it controls the start of another Process Chain.
Hope that helps...

Table for Process type with BP Number of sold to party

Hi Friends,
Please share me Table name where i'll get the Process Type (Transaction Type) and Sold to Party Number or BP Guid of the transaction.
I want to create Target group for BP's who are involve in Particular Transaction.
For infoset creation i have already tried Table CRMD_ORDERADM_H and CRMD_ORDER_INDEX but not able to join exact conditions.
Regards,
DD's

HI frieds,
Thanks for u r support i have created Infosets using table CRMD_ORDERADM_H, CRMD_LINK & CRMD_PARTNER and, made joining link between them (Actually both Guids in CRMD_LINK and CRMD_PARTNER are not maching)
Next step is i have created Datasource using my infoest and created Attribute list for same.
After all this excercise i tried to Create target group for BP's who are involved in particular transaction(Process type) but in target group count come to ZERO !!!!!!!!! why this happening ???
Please understand my final expected output which is in bold
Regards,
DD's

Authorization in CJ88 by Processing type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for