Automatic creation of new tax classification

Hi
Help needed in understanding......
Automatic creation of tax classification in taxes in billing tab of customer master , after creation of a sales depot in a different country
thanks
Anil

Unless you use jurisdiction codes, and no external tax system, for
example with tax procedure TAXUSJ, there is no validity dates for the
condition records.  You can see this differnce by comparing the tables
A003 without jurisdiction codes and A053 with jurisdiction codes.  A053
contains the extra fields DATBI (key field) and DATAB.  This is the
standard functionality.
Please have a look at the following part of note 418582:
" Changing past percentage rates has to be inhibited in order to avoid
database inconsistencies. For this reason, the functions which allow you
to transport time-dependent tax codes with percentage rates from the
past are not supported."

Similar Messages

  • New tax classification

    Hi Friends
    I have created new tax classification for material as CST 3%. while creating an order with a material whose tax classification is 1% tax, I have changed this 1% tax to newly created CST 3% in line item billing document tab manually. Then automatically in condition tab page CST 3% is getting triggered instead of 1% tax. Now my question is can I change in the same way to already created sale orders or not? While changing its not getting affected with CST 3%. So is there any alternative for getting triggered of this CST 3% for already created sale orders or no chance of changing?
    regards
    Ramesh

    hi,
    You can change it but please ensure the condition record validity period for the UTXJ condition record. You may have created the UTXJ condiiton record with newly created tax classification but it must be valid from recent days, if you change the validity then I guess it should work.
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Automate Creation of new items in EBS

    Hey everyone -
    Just a question ,
    we want to automate creation of new items in our system.
    Our view is something like -
    1. user GUI to request a new item, according to predefined templates.
    2. Users fill a few fields of information.
    3. Item manager gets notified and approves item is needed.
    4. Automation to run batch and create everything relevant. (org assignment, item KFF, category assignments, BOMs etc). As much automation as possible, we can map template behaviour, variety is small.
    I was wondering if there is any product supporting such behaviour.
    I looked into Oracle's APC, and it seems like it doesnt do enough. Besides as far as I noticed it relies mostly on Item Catalog attributes which we don't. Also Im not sure if this product is "alive" coz oracle bought AGILE for PLM.
    Does anyone know of a product that supports creation of new items and is flexible to fit our needs?
    We want to make sure we're not missing something before we develop custom code for that.
    Thanks,
    Aaron

    Hi,
    This is prom PIM to Oracle
    I have done an interface which creates an item in master and child .Which assighns category set on iots level controls .It inserts item into all active subinventories.
    It notifies the end user with email any item already exits and error .
    Regarding templates.
    it assigs compatible templates at master and org leve.These are predefined and are not validated in program
    Edited by: Sankuratri on Apr 5, 2009 10:02 PM

  • Creation of new tax codes

    Hi,
    I  have a requirement for creation of new tax codes. I have created new tax codes in FTXP and assigned G/L accounts in OB40. This part is clear for me.
    Now my questions are as under.
    1.     Where do i restrict the validity date for old tax codes and validity date for new tax codes.
    2     What needs to be updated in terms of condition records
    3     Is there anything needs tobe  update in info records for MM.
    Regards
    Krishna

    Unless you use jurisdiction codes, and no external tax system, for
    example with tax procedure TAXUSJ, there is no validity dates for the
    condition records.  You can see this differnce by comparing the tables
    A003 without jurisdiction codes and A053 with jurisdiction codes.  A053
    contains the extra fields DATBI (key field) and DATAB.  This is the
    standard functionality.
    Please have a look at the following part of note 418582:
    " Changing past percentage rates has to be inhibited in order to avoid
    database inconsistencies. For this reason, the functions which allow you
    to transport time-dependent tax codes with percentage rates from the
    past are not supported."

  • Creation of New Tax Structure

    Hi
    I want to create a new Tax Structure of  Tax Code  for  -   Vat 14% on 75% Inventorised + S.T.  10.3% on 100% Inventorised.
    Can you help me out the configuration steps.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Kshipra G

    Hi,
    Create Calculation Procedure  :
    Path :Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Tax on Sales/Purchases>Basic Settings>Check Calculation Procedure T.code:OBYZ
    Assign Country to Calculation Procedure :
    Path :Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Tax on Sales/Purchases>Basic Settings>Assign Country to Calculation Procedure T.code: OBBG
    Define Tax Codes for Sales and Purchases :
    Path :Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Tax onSales/Purchases-->Calculation->Define Tax Codes for Sales and Purchases T.code : FTXP
    Define Tax Accounts  :
    Path:Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>TaxonSales/Purchases>Posting>Define Tax Accounts  T.code : OB40
    Create Tax Conditions and Tax percentage : T.code FV11
    Thanks,
    Raviteja

  • Problem Creation of New Tax code

    Hello gurus,
    the client has new requirement 3 % cst the S.D. people have configured the condition type for CST 3%. and it is reflected in pricing procedure. how i should configure the same in taxinj procedure with tax code.
    pls urgently help.
    points assured.
    anand

    Go to FTXP, Create a Tax code, Put Percentage in the condition.
    Assign GL code in OB40.
    Test it & this will work.
    Regards

  • Automatic creation of new dimension members

    Hello all,
    Bit of a long post so please bear with me.
    I am about to embark on only my third BPC project after having spent several years implementing solutions using BusinessObjects Planning (formerly SRC software), and am still struggling to come up with an elegant solution to the fact that I cannot save data to dimension elements unless they are already explicitly defined in the dimension member list (presumably due to cube architecture).
    Those of you who have used BOP/SRC will remember this as unvalidated dimensions.
    I find having to first go to admin and pre create members before being able to use an input schedule to save data against them is very restrictive.
    I'm hoping one of you guys can help me improve on the workaround I currently use.
    For example I have a 'bid submission' input schedule that is used by the user to submit bids for increased budget, capital or revenue, capturing basic costs and commentary. The user selects a bid number from a combo box which is populated by using an EVLST formula to read in pre created dimension members. I have to save a flag to the db which I then use to exclude already used numbers when feeding the combo box on future submissions.
    Which works ok but if I have a hierarchy on bid number based on say, cost centre, how do I get around the fact that number ranges have to be pre-assigned to cost centre, Cost Centre A = 1 to 1000, Cost Centre B = 1001 to 2000 etc. What happens if I go over the 1000 on Cost centre A? I then get non contiguous ranges per cost centre.
    Is it possible for the bid number to be dictated by the user when they start to fill in the bid submission? Or give the impression that they are?
    Or if the client has a bid number format that cannot be pre created? Eg incorporating things like year or person etc. This information could be save separately but not within the bid number. Is it possible to save data to dimension property columns from an input schedule?
    Hope you guys can help
    Many thanks
    Phil

    Philip,
    few questions.
    Which versio of BPC.
    What is your data Source
    there are few post on the below link you may find helpful
    Please list your Question in short with the tings you want.
    Re: AdminTask_MakeDim.dts
    Thanks

  • New Tax code Creation for CST(Condition type

    Hi Friends,
    I am facing an issue during creation of new Tax-code for CST; condition type JIN1. After defining the tax percentage; system is picking an automatic G/L account, which is a grey field and can't be editable. We need to change G/L account and need to assign a new one.
    Can you please tell us how can we remove the default assigned and non-editable G/L account.
    Your support is appreciable.
    Rgds, Krishan Raheja.

    Hi Krishnan,
    Use transaction OB40, here double click on the Account Key (you can check this account key assigned to condition type in OBQ3 and also in FTXP screen) that is mapped to condition type JIN1 and enter your chart of accounts. Now change the G/L account you want.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi.

  • New tax code creation and pricing procedure for Sri Lanka

    Hi,
    I have one company code in India..Now I have requirement to create new plant under different company code in Sri Lanka.
    Can anybody tell which tax pricing procedure is to be defined for Sri Lanka and what are different steps involved in the creation of new tax code for Sri Lanka.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sunil Singh

    Hi Mr. Biju,
    Thanks for reply...
    Enterprise structure has already been decided. Everything we have copied from India for Sri Lanka and working fine except below error.
    As I have already mentioned that I have copied tax pricing procedure for Sri Lanka from Taxinn then assigned to country code LK (Sri Lanka). I have created new tax code for LK (Sri Lanka) in FTXP then I have assigned the tax code with company code in SPRO Logestic General--- Basic settings.
    After completeing this config, system is showing error" tax code is not defined to company code" in MIRO.
    Please suggest...
    Thanks & Regards
    Sunil Singh

  • Tax classification clarity needed

    Dear Experts
    In customer master data  in billing  tab we will give ex    1 full excise with  12.5% and   2   full excise  3% cst  now if i create ne tax  classification , then what all the setting i need to make , how  it flows can any body help me in this regard
    Thanks
    Basavaraj

    Hi,
    First of all, which is the tax procedure you are using?
    If its TAXINJ, then you create the new tax classification using OVK3 for UTXJ condition.
    Maintain the tax classification in customer master for UTXJ & create a new condition record (tax code assignment) for the country/plant region/cust.tax classification/Material tax classification using VK11/VK13.
    If you are using TAXINN, Maintain the tax classification in OVK3 & assign the same in the customer master to the tax condition mentioned in OVK1.
    Maintain the condition record for the above condition for the new tax classification combination in Vk11 & Check.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Tax classification

    hi!
    how to create tax classification settnigs in billing of sales area data section of Customer Master.
    thankyou

    Hi,
    To create new tax classification for customer master go to>>SPRO>>Sales & Distribution>>Basic functions>>Taxes>>Define tax relevancy of master records.
    Select customer taxes.
    In this screen enter new tax category. Tax category is nothing but the condition used in sales pricing to determine all the taxes relevant for that country.
    Enter tax classification of the customer eg: 0 for tax exempt, 1 for liable for taxes.
    Save the configuration.
    Now in Customer master data>>Sales area data>>Billing Document screen you will get the tax category data. Enter relevant tax classification against that tax category.
    System considers this classification as one of the criterias to calculate the taxes in sales pricing.
    Regards,
    Savita Swami

  • New tax displayed when plant created in new country (Customer / Material)

    Hi Gurus,
    We create a plant in a new country.
    Impacts are:
    - New tax classification MWST to fullfil in Material master data (Sales org.1 view)
    - New tax classification MWST to fullfil in Customer master data (Sales org. view)
    So, this new tax MWST displays because a new departure country is available in SAP Organizational structure.
    Tax data is a mandatory field on Material Master Data and Customer Master Data. Try to go in MM02 and you need to complete it to save Material or Customer.
    I would like to update in mass tax for Material and Customer.
    I try to use MASS or XD99 or MM17 but it is not working. Tables impacted (MLAN for Material and KNVI for Customer) don't include the new country. I suppose this is a SAP control when we use MM02 or XD02.
    In my mind, it will be very complex to use LSMW (plenty of Customers and Materials, need to manage right Sales area so retreatment before...). Are there tips to fix it? Have you already reach this problem?
    Many thanks.
    Stéphane

    Hi Stéphane,
       I faced same problem:
          Using MM17 to insert new records it's not what i wanted to do.
    so i follow these steps.
    1-   I used SHDB to save a new recording with MM01.
    2-  Download the recording and edited with Word.
    3-  merge data file with this word and save it as a text file.
    4- upload text file recording to SHDB.
    5- processed it.
    It worked fine and you get a log of operations to control that works fine.
    Best regards
    Juan.

  • New field for tax classification (Pricing)

    Hi
    The scenario is - we need to map a taxes from R/3 to CRM. for this we cant use MWST , as this tax condition is already being used in the current process.
    If we use another condition type then the tax classification for Material doesnt get picked in CRM. So according to the SAP note -336235, we have done the development.
    +The developments includes + - new field created for material tax classification purpose and this field assigned to Pricing structure KOMP and KOMG. we have also maintained condition record by using this field , but the data is not being read by this field during the calculation of taxes in sales order (R/3).The data is exist in material master -Sales org1 tab -Tax classification (1 or 0).
    Could anyone let me know, that how the tax classification data can be read from material master for this new customized field.
    Thanks in advance.

    To use a custom field in pricing, you need to do two things:
    1.  Add the field to KOMP and KOMG and
    2.  Move the appropriate value in a user-exit.
    Your post says that you have done 1. above.  Have you coded the user-exit for 2. above?  The user-exits are in MV45AFZZ.

  • Us Payoll : Tax Model Changes : Creation Of A New Tax Class : Impact

    Hi Experts,
    Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specification of PC 71 for a wagetype so that it is taxed only for a particular tax authority , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries ( with the new specification ) for other tax authorities as well so that the existing tax calculations happen as it is.
    The issue is explained IN DETAIL below :
    We have one requirement to include certain wage types X Y Z for  the calculation of Transit  District Excise Tax /435 in the tax authority ABC
    When we checked our system, for these wage types X Y Z the corresponding tax classification is set as 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) which is linked to tax type 1 and not linked to 35 tax type , so we need to assign it to a specification which is having both 1 and 35 tax types. We can assign this to 935 which is linked to both 1 and 35 however this will impact all the wage types that are linked to 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) specification in PC 71.
    Our business does not want these other wagetypes to be impacted i.e the requirement is that ONLY X Y Z wagetypes should be included in the calculation of Transit District Exercise Tax /435 for the tax authority ABC.So the option is that  we have is to create a new 71 tax class specificaiton say * and assign it to these wagetypes and then create a new entry assining this * in the table  T5UTM to 935 for this tax authority so that it is taxed for Transit  District Excise Tax /435.
    However since we are assigning a new tax class specffication to these wagetypes, there will be a impact on ALL THE OTHER tax authorities where these wagetypes X Y Z  are having an old specification of  0 ( Regular taxable wages ). So we have to create newe entries with this new specification * in the table T5UTM so that the current tax calcutions are not impacted.
    We have about 500 tax authoties or  500 tax models where we will have to create new entries with the new tax class specirication '" * " , so that these wagetypes are taxed as they are being taxed today, for all of the other tax authorities.
    Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specirication of PC 71 , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries for other tax authorities., which is next to being impossible as we cannot create 500 entries.
    Alternatively we are looking at using the TAX MODIFIER for this requirement , please advise if anyone has used TAX MODIFIER  for this kind of a requirement mentioned above. Any suggestions are most welcome.
    Regards,
    Vineeth
    Please Dont use Caps letters
    Edited by: Moderator

    Yes we are also referring to the same and this is the actual issue we have , each tax authority has its own tax model. We have to customize (add) this new tax type in the tax models or it won't be considered ( as you have mentioned ).
    But we have over 500 different tax models and we cannot be adding this new specification in each tax model , Please advise how this could be handled other than writing a rule. We are just thinking loud if there is anything that we are missing.
    These wagetypes are quiet common in all tax authorities , so have to be added in all the tax models i.e. for all tax authorities.

  • Requirement of creation of new condition types and Account keys tax codes

    Hi,
                   In what all possible scenarios will the requirement to create new Condition types and accont keys arise for the creation of new depreciation keys.
    Thanks
    Raja.
    Edited by: Raja Gopal 345 on Aug 29, 2010 1:06 PM

    Unless you use jurisdiction codes, and no external tax system, for
    example with tax procedure TAXUSJ, there is no validity dates for the
    condition records.  You can see this differnce by comparing the tables
    A003 without jurisdiction codes and A053 with jurisdiction codes.  A053
    contains the extra fields DATBI (key field) and DATAB.  This is the
    standard functionality.
    Please have a look at the following part of note 418582:
    " Changing past percentage rates has to be inhibited in order to avoid
    database inconsistencies. For this reason, the functions which allow you
    to transport time-dependent tax codes with percentage rates from the
    past are not supported."

Maybe you are looking for