(B1DE) column ordering problem

Hello
Just as title suggets I'm using B1DE to create my addon. Somewhere in the middle I added some additional columns
to db file created by B1DE wizard.
I also updated xml file adding column elements. But the order in which they are place in xml file is not reflected on my matrix.
Actually only one added column is in proper place. Others are in some random posiitons away from where I want them to be.
How to enforce correct ordering if not in xml file?
Thanks
Kamil

Hi Jacques,
Could it be that the AddOnRegDataGen executable isn't the 2005, but the 2004 version?
Guessing wildly,
OC.

Similar Messages

Report Does Not Follow Select Column Order

Hi all,
Apex 2.2 on 10gXE
I always encounter this problem, the display column on report does not follow the select column sequence order in the "region source".
It is very tedious clicking the up/down arrow one-by-one in the "report attributes" especially if the display columns are plenty like 40 columns.
Is there a fix/patch or alternative tips for this bug?
Thanks a lot,
Edited by: 843228 on May 24, 2011 10:32 PM

Apex 2.2 on 10gXEStart by upgrading from this old unsupported version.
>
I always encounter this problem, the display column on report does not follow the select column sequence order in the "region source".
It is very tedious clicking the up/down arrow one-by-one in the "report attributes" especially if the display columns are plenty like 40 columns.
Is there a fix/patch or alternative tips for this bug?
>
This is not a bug. APEX maintains the original column order of the report. This avoids problems downstream in areas like the processing of <tt>g_fnn</tt> arrays in declarative tabular forms, where the assigned arrays are column-order dependent.
APEX 4.x fixes column ordering bugs that could lead to report corruption, and includes drag-and-drop column ordering in the new tree view in addition to the up/down arrow re-ordering.
If you really want column order to follow that in the source query, the workaround is to create a new report using the modified query.

Is that important column order in a query with row_number function

Hi folks,
I am using Oracle 11g R2 on HP-UX machine.
I have 2 types of query with row_number and I think they are same but output of each of them are different. I changed only column order in query2.
Query 1 :
(SELECT
"LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."CONTRACT_SK" "CONTRACT_SK",
"LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."SIMCARD_SK" "SIMCARD_SK"
FROM (
SELECT row_number ()
OVER (
PARTITION BY "R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK".
"CONTRACT_SK"
ORDER BY
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."START_DATE" DESC,
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."SEQ_NUM" DESC NULLS LAST) /* EXPRESSION_3.OUTGRP1.SIRA */
"SIRA",
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."CONTRACT_SK" "CONTRACT_SK",
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."SIMCARD_SK" "SIMCARD_SK"
FROM "SRC_OZRDS"."R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK" "R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK")
"LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"
WHERE ("LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."SIRA" = 1))
Output of this like that :
CONTRACT_SK SIMCARD_SK
1     1
1     3
1     4
1     5
1     6
1     11
1     12
1     14
1     15
1     16
Query 2 :
(SELECT
"LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."CONTRACT_SK" "CONTRACT_SK",
"LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."SIMCARD_SK" "SIMCARD_SK"
FROM (
SELECT
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."CONTRACT_SK" "CONTRACT_SK",
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."SIMCARD_SK" "SIMCARD_SK",
row_number ()
OVER (
PARTITION BY "R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK".
"CONTRACT_SK"
ORDER BY
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."START_DATE" DESC,
"R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK"."SEQ_NUM" DESC NULLS LAST) /* EXPRESSION_3.OUTGRP1.SIRA */
"SIRA"
FROM "SRC_OZRDS"."R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK" "R_CON_SUBS_SIMCARD_LK")
"LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"
WHERE ("LOOKUP_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."SIRA" = 1))
Output of this like that:
2     874812
7     70097256
8     18734091
9     158024
10     815397739
13     22657919
19     83177779
20     82579529
22     5829949
23     35348926
25     3865978
I expected the second output, because there are lots of contract sk but there is one contract_sk in first query result. i did not get the point. What is the problem ?

user8649469 wrote:
I changed only column order in query2.So what else do you expect? If you order, for example, by last name, fist name don't you think rows will be returned in a different order (and therefore same row will have different row number) than ordering by first name, last name?
SY.

BUG: SQL Developer 1.5.3 CSV export column order broken

There's a bug in the 1.5.3 release of SQL Developer regarding data export. This bug re-orders the column order in the data export to be alphabetically sorted. This produces mangled CSV files if used on a table or a view.
This is a critical bug to me since I need to produce lots of ad-hoc data CSV export files. I'm staying with SQL Developer 1.5.0.53 (53.38) for now as it doesn't have this problem.
This is the same bug as present in Jdeveloper 11.1 as described in my post here: BUG: Jdev 11.1.1.0.0 -- DB table data export column order is not preserved
Quoted from that post:
When I connect to Oracle database, get the table list, right click on the table and select 'Export Data'->csv. The dialog box opens with three tabs: Format, Columns, Where. The column order displayed in both tabs Columns and Where is alphabetic. Because alphabetic ordering re-arranges columns from their initial ordering in the table, this screws up CSV export because columns are not in their intended order. This same problem occurs when I try to export data from views to generate a CSV file with a particular column order.
Please open/check bug report if it's already open.
Thanks!

This happens with all of the export options for tables or views if you right click from the connections tab table list. If I pull it up in the main window and go to the data tab, I can then right click and it will keep the column id order for some of the views and tables. But not all.
I am running 1.5.3 Build Main 5783 on a Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 platform

Can't change column order from document content type

Hi,
I noticed a strange error in our SharePoint 2010 environment:
We are using a SharePoint 2010 Enterprise Edition which was migrated from a MOSS 2007 Enterprise Edition with one central document library.
In this library are several content types plus the given document content type which was already there.
When I try to edit the column order in the document content type settings the following error occurs:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and
where it originated in the code.
Exception Details:
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location
of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.]
Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.ChangeFieldOrderPage.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +376
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +65
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +2427
This error only occurs with the document content type. Furthermore I am not able to reproduce this error on other libraries except when
I am using a template from this library.
I tried to delete this content type but every time an error occurs which is saying that the content type is still in use. I checked the entire library and all informations from the SharePoint Manager 2010 Tool but the content type is definitely no longer in
use.
I appreciate every little bit of help regarding this problem.
PS:
There is also another error concerning every content type in this library: I can’t create a new or use the standard Microsoft document information panel template because every time I try to there also occurs an error which
states out a NullReferenceException regarding the metadata of this library. But that is another story which is next on my to-do list. First I would like to solve the first error concerning the column order.
Thanks and regards,
Thomas K.

Hi TKellner,
Thanks for your post.
1.
Please try to use the code below to check whether the Content Type is in used.
http://www.learningsharepoint.com/forum/sharepoint-2007-programming/check-where-the-content-type-is-used-in-sharepoint-site/
2.
Can you open the Document Library in SharePoint Designer 2010? Also, can you open the template file correctly?
Share the result.

Formula column order

Hi All....
Hope all had a good weekend......any way
how can i order my results in a report using the formula column
the problem is that i have a query which give me one column(group by) and from the column i'm linking some othe formula column ....and i want to order my report using the formula columns....
Looking forward to hear from you guys.....
Se ya

hai,
i think u r using formula column in your report.then you can give
break order for this column in the property palete.
bye

Column order in ALV using in portal environment does not work

Hello,
I set the columns order of an ALV table ( in WD ABAP ). For one portal user these settings are not applied. ( columns seems to be in random order ) For the other users it works fine. I tried to see the differences between the portal users, but did not find anything.
I guess it is some portal user personalization setting problem.
Anyone knows how to fix this?
Thanks,
Tamas

Tamas,
I think user has done some personalisation or if you are Netweaver 701 you can rearrange the columns in a table
Thanks
Bala Duvvuri

Table Column Ordering Matters when using Forms6i

Just an FYI on something strange that we encountered...
We have a Forms application that calls a function within a Package stored in the database. The only parameter to the function is a PL/SQL record that is based on the columns of a table. Our users need to run the application against 2 different database instances. We receve an "ORA-04062: Signature of Package has changed" error message when running the Form against the database that we DID NOT compile the form against. The reason is because the column ordering of the table that the record is based upon is different between the 2 databases.
Here are the details:
Setup:
     2 different databases. ( devDB and prdDB )
     1 table:
          On devDB:
               create table test_file (file_id NUMBER,
description VARCHAR2(256)
          Same table on prdDB but with different column ordering:
               create table test_file (description VARCHAR2(256),
file_id NUMBER
     1 database package in both databases:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE PS_TEST AS
     SUBTYPE tr_file IS TEST_FILE%ROWTYPE;
     FUNCTION Create_File( r_file     tr_file ) RETURN NUMBER;
END PS_TEST;
     1 Oracle Form that fills the tr_file record with data and calls PS_TEST.Create_File passing in the tr_file record.
Results:
     If the above Form is compiled on the database devDB, trying to run the Forms Executable against prdDB will generate an error message stating: ORA-04062: Signature of Package has changed. If the above Forms executable is run against devDB, everything works fine. The problem is that when the Oracle form is compiled it apparently captures the tr_file signature from the package, which would be something like ( file_id, description ) on devDB since it is specified as %ROWTYPE. When this compiled form is ran against the prdDB database, the package signature is different because the tr_file signature would be something like ( description, file_id ) on prdDB because of the column ordering. The error doesn't occur if you recreate the "devDB" table with the columns in the same order as "prdDB". This would only be a problem with using the %ROWTYPE with PL/SQL records.
So it appears that column ordering does matter in some situations.
Thanks.

would create a cell renderer only once -- the same
JTextPane is used to render any cell in the table that
shares the same renderer.Thanks for the reply. It's something I'm going to look into, but I do create only one renderer, and use that one renderer to create new JTextPane subclasses when getCellRendererComponent() is called - hence, there is one renderer, but there are multiple instances of the actual rendered component.
In the meantime, I'm just marking up the text with HTML to create the presentation I want, and it works okay. It'd be nice if I can get it working with Styles, though.
Thanks again,
- Chris

Schema Comparisons - Ignore column order

I'm using SSDT for the first time and I want to be able to ignore column ordering when doing schema comparisons.
There was a setting in GDR that I cannot find called - "Force table column order to be identical" - does this still exist?
Also in the old sqldeployment file there was an IgnoreColumnOrder setting. Cannot find either of these.

It's unfortunate that the general attitude of Microsoft seems to be geared towards coming up with excuses and explanations instead of solutions. I was excited to use schema/data compare in VS2013 but found that it's basically useless to us because of the
lack of this feature. I'm just glad there are other reasonable programs on the market to do comparisons (RedGate, for example).
It's evident that each year Microsoft becomes even more detached from reality. People complained about IE, Microsoft didn't solve the problems, and now hardly anyone uses IE. No one is going to use this shoddy comparison tool for the same reasons. You're
just wasting people's time with incomplete products like this, and that's frustrating and builds resentment in the people who are paying to use your products and services. I'll have no problem jumping ship for any given Microsoft product the second a competitor
releases something better.

BUG: Jdev 11.1.1.0.0 -- DB table data export column order is not preserved

Hello,
I've ran into a problem with Jdeveloper 11g, public release, Build JDEVADF_MAIN.BOXER_GENERIC_081002.2127.5156. Oracle IDE version is 11.1.1.0.31.51.56
When I connect to Oracle database, get the table list, right click on the table and select 'Export Data'->csv. The dialog box opens with three tabs: Format, Columns, Where. The column order displayed in both tabs Columns and Where is alphabetic. Because alphabetic ordering re-arranges columns from their initial ordering in the table, this screws up the export because columns are not in their intended order. This same problem occurs when I try to export data from views to generate a CSV file with a particular column order for our vendor. Since Jdev scrambles the column order I have to rely on SQLdeveloper to generate CSV exports, since SQLdeveloper has the same functionality but it preserves the column order.
It would be nice if Jdeveloper preserved the column order on export.
Thanks!

Update:
This bug is now also present in the SQL Developer 1.5.3.
I've posted a bug report on the appropriate forum: BUG: SQL Developer 1.5.3 CSV export column order broken

ITunes 7.2 Problem: Song Order Problem

Equipment Specs:
IPOD -- First Generation, 1 G size, Firmware ver # 1.1.5
ITunes -- Ver # 7.2.0.34
Problem
I recently updated to the above version of ITunes. I also recently reset/erased all my songs (no podcasts or nothing else)from my IPOD.
I then reloaded just songs to my pod using the drag and drop method from the music file. I then re-arranged the songs in my desired order.
I then disonnected the pod and exited ITunes.
When I later restarted ITunes with the pod connected, my song order had changed. With the pod still open in ITunes, I am no longer able to change the play order position. As say, move song #45 to position #2 and etc.
Has something changed as I was always able to do this prior to updating ITunes and the pod ?
Was this caused by updating ITunes to the newest version?
Is there a solution to be able to manage the order of your songs as before ?
Can I use a 6.0 version of Itunes inorder to regain this song order problem. I was always able to use this function in a previous version.
Wished I never would have updated to 7.2 from whatever I had. I really should have know better.
Thx
Arc

Solved my problem by reloading ITunes Version 7.1.1.5. Now I can accomplish what I want to do.
Here's an associated thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=981696&tstart=0

How to set the column order of a sealed column in a custom Content Type for the new item form NewDocSet.aspx?

Dear SharePoint Developers,
Please help.
I need to know How to set the column order of a sealed column in a custom Content Type for the new item form NewDocSet.aspx?
I think this is a "sealed column", whatever that is, which is shown in SPD 2013 as a column of content type "document, folder, MyCustomContentType".
I know when I set the column order in my custom Content Type settings page, it is correct.
But, when I load the NewDocSet.aspx page, the column order that I set in the settings page is NOT used for this "sealed column" which is bad.
Can you help?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Mark Kamoski
-- Mark Kamoski

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you want to set the column order of a sealed column in a custom Content Type for the new item form NewDocSet.aspx.
Per my knowledge, if you have Content Type management enabled for the list or library (if you see a list of content type with the option to add more), the display order of columns is set for each content type.
Drill down into one of them and you'll see the option under the list of columns for that content type.
To apply the column order in the NewDocSet.aspx page, you need to:
Select Site Settings, under Site Collection Administration, click Content type publishing. In the Refresh All Published
Content Types section, choose Refresh all published content types on next
update.
Run two timer jobs(Content Type Hub, Content Type Subscriber) in central admin(Central Administration--> Monitoring--> Review timer jobs).
More information:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/95028/content-types-not-refreshing-on-sp-online
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Column order in a select * query

Suppose I have 256 columns in a table and if I query select * from tablename ,what will the column order in the result.Will this be always same as order as in created statement?

If the columns were all in the original CREATE TABLE statement, then, yes, the ordering of columns in SELECT * FROM will match the order from the CREATE TABLE statement.
If columns were added after the initial create, then the original columns will come first (in their order) and then the added columns (in their order), etc.
In the real world, it is a very bad practice to use SELECT * and have expectations about the ordering of the columns. Consider this scenario:
Table T was created and implemented in production a year ago with columns A, B, C
A project started up three months ago and added column D but the project is stalled in development. So in development T had columns A, B, C, D
Later, another project started up and added columns E and F. Unlike the other project, it has progressed to Test. and Production. So in Development the table has columns A, B, C, D, E, F. In test and production the table has columns A, B, C, E, F.
Now that stuck project has progressed to Test and Production. Now T has columns A, B, C, E, F, D in test and production but still A, B, C, D, E, F in development.
Until someone notices and decides to fix it (where and how?)
Be very, very careful about using SELECT *.

Column order in SQL Query (PL/SQL function returning a query)

Hi,
when I define a PL/SQL function returning a query inside a region, I often find that the column order is arbitrarily changed.
How do I enforce the column order ?
Bye,
Flavio

I removed the 11th column called service_name from this dynamic query: and now the report says: report error:
ORA-01403: no data found. I messed around with the Headiuns Type. It was set to Custom. I changed it to Column Names. There is no difference.
I am not sure how to fix?
declare topqry varchar2(32000);
whereqry varchar2(32000);
finalqry varchar2(32000);
var_status varchar2(100);
division_status varchar2(50);
office_status varchar2(1000);
user_status varchar2(1000);
overdue_status varchar2(1000);
begin
if :P10_FALLBACK = 'All' then
var_status:= ' and vp.status in (''FA'',''FBA'',''FBI'',''25%'',''50%'',''90%'',''Closed'') ';
elsif :P10_FALLBACK = 'Active' then
var_status:= ' and vp.status in (''FA'',''25%'',''50%'',''90%'',''FBA'') ';
elsif :P10_FALLBACK = 'FB' then
var_status:= ' and vp.status in (''FBA'',''FBI'') ';
elsif :P10_FALLBACK = 'Closed' then
var_status:= ' and vp.status in (''Closed'') ';
elsif :P10_FALLBACK = 'Inactive' then
var_status:= ' and vp.status in (''FBI'') ';
end if;
if :P10_DIVISION = 'All' then
division_status:= ' and vp.vms_division in (''News'',''Ad Services'') ';
elsif :P10_DIVISION = 'News' then
division_status:= ' and vp.vms_division in (''News'') ';
elsif :P10_DIVISION = 'Ad' then
division_status:= ' and vp.vms_division in (''Ad Services'') ';
end if;
if :P10_OFFICE = '%' then
office_status:= ' and OFFICE_ID in (select office
from VMS_OFFICE_ACCESS
where user_id = lower(:P0_user) ) ';
else
office_status:= ' and OFFICE_ID in :P10_OFFICE ';
end if;
if :P10_LIMIT_USER = '%' then
user_status := ' and SALESPERSON in (select first_name || '' '' || last_name
from VMS_PROSPECT_users u
join vms_office_access o
on u.office_id = OFFICE
where o.user_id = lower(:P0_USER) ) ';
else
user_status:= ' and SALESPERSON in (:P10_LIMIT_USER ) ';
end if;
if :P10_SHOW_OVERDUE = 'Show' then
overdue_status:= ' and target_close_date <= sysdate ';
var_status:= ' and vp.status in (''25%'',''50%'',''90%'',''FBA'') ';
else
overdue_status:= ' and FIRST_APPOINTMENT between
nvl(to_date(:P10_FIRST_APPT_START, ''mm/dd/yyyy''),FIRST_APPOINTMENT) and
nvl(to_date(:P10_FIRST_APPT_END,''mm/dd/yyyy''),FIRST_APPOINTMENT) ';
end if;
topqry := 'SELECT OFFICE_ID ,vp.PROSPECT_ID ,ENTRY_DATE ,ACCOUNT , NEXT_CONTACT_DATE ,ACTION_STEP ,
TARGET_CLOSE_DATE ,vp.STATUS ,SALESPERSON ,vp.SALES_TYPE ,service_name , FIRST_APPOINTMENT ,MODIFY_DATE ,EST_ANNUAL_REVENUE ,EST_INCREMENTAL_REVENUE ,
pi.NOTES , pi.SALES_TYPE ,pi.STATUS ,Contact ,Origin_Source FROM VMS_PROSPECTING_ITEMS pi right outer join VMS_PROSPECTS vp on vp.PROSPECT_ID = pi.PROSPECT_ID left outer join VMS_SERVICES vs on vs.service_ID = pi.service_ID where 1 = 1 ';
whereqry := ' and (not exists (select *
from VMS_PROSPECTING_ITEMS i3
where vp.prospect_id = i3.prospect_id)
or exists (select *
from VMS_PROSPECTING_ITEMS i2
where i2.order_id = pi.order_id
and active = ''Y'' )) and instr(upper(ACCOUNT),upper(nvl(:P10_ACCOUNT,ACCOUNT))) > 0 ';
whereqry := whereqry || var_status || division_status || office_status || user_status || overdue_status;
finalqry := topqry || whereqry;
return finalqry ;
end;

How to change the column order in the DB?

Hi all,
For example,
     there is an employee database with the field names empno(1),empname(2), empphone(3), empaddress(4), empsal(5). the values in the brackets are the column order i.e., the order in which the column names are placed.
     I have the details of the employee records in a .txt file and i have to upload the file with the same column order with some delimiter. I done it but in future if any one have the details of the employee details with some other column order i.e., empaddress(1), empsal(5), empno(3), empname(4), empphone(5)
     how i can change the column order of the database ...
Thanx in advance...
Bye,

how i can change the column order of the databaseYou don't. You specify the column order in you're insert.
PreparedStatement pstmt = conn.prepareStatement ("insert into EMP (EMPNO, ENAME) values (?, ?)");
pstmt.setInt (1, 1500);
pstmt.setString (2, "A Name");
pstmt.execute ();
Steve.

(B1DE) column ordering problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for